Academic literature on the topic 'Procedure arbitrali'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Procedure arbitrali.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Procedure arbitrali"
Vilayat Garashova, Sabina. "DƏNİZ HÜQUQUNDA MÜBAHİSƏLƏRİN HƏLLİ PROSEDURU KİMİ ARBITRAJ." SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH 08, no. 4 (April 27, 2022): 147–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.36719/2789-6919/08/147-150.
Full textPerez, Vicente, Andres Garcia, and Jesus Gomez. "Facilitation of equivalence – equivalence responding: generalization of relational responses." International Journal of Psychological Research 4, no. 2 (December 30, 2011): 20–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.21500/20112084.774.
Full textMoser, Robin. "Effects of Procedural Misconduct on the Allocation of Costs in International Arbitration." ASA Bulletin 40, Issue 4 (December 1, 2022): 822–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/asab2022072.
Full textShore, Laurence, Vittoria De Benedetti, and Mario de Nitto Personè. "A Pathology (Yet) to Be Cured?" Journal of International Arbitration 39, Issue 3 (June 1, 2022): 365–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2022016.
Full textAlam, Md Habib. "Application of CISG in Arbitration: A Combined Procedure or Parallel Procedure?" International Journal of Community Service & Engagement 2, no. 1 (March 2, 2021): 50–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.47747/ijcse.v2i1.192.
Full textBilousov, Yurii, and Volodymyr Nahnybida. "Applicable Procedural Law in International Commercial Arbitration." Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 31, no. 2 (June 22, 2022): 51–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.2.51-69.
Full textPryles, Michael. "Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure." Journal of International Arbitration 24, Issue 3 (June 1, 2007): 327–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2007023.
Full textCarmona, Carlos Alberto. "Flexibilização do Procedimento Arbitral." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 6, Issue 24 (December 1, 2009): 7–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2009063.
Full textŠrndić, Faruk, and Jasmin Fejzić. "Stacking: Determining the result system of an arbitrary force system with defined attack points." Tehnika 75, no. 6 (2020): 603–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/tehnika2005603s.
Full textOral, Nilüfer, and Massimo Lando. "International Procedure between Past and Future – Procedural Developments in Law of the Sea Dispute Settlement in 2021." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 21, no. 1 (March 15, 2022): 198–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341470.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Procedure arbitrali"
CONSOLO, GIOVANNI. "THE SETTLEMENT OF CROSS-BORDER TAX DISPUTES WITHIN THE EU: WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10281/259330.
Full textOn 10 October 2017, the Council adopted the “Directive on Tax Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the EU” n. 2017/1852/UE. The adoption of this Directive stems from the recent trend, raised within the international tax community following the BEPS actions, to improve the international tax dispute resolution framework and, more in general, from the increasing concerns of the EU institutions with international double taxation. It is, indeed, established that the OECD BEPS actions have stipulated wide-ranging modifications to domestic tax laws and to tax treaties, that could increase legal uncertainty for relevant stakeholders and the risk of double taxation or of taxation not in accordance with Double Taxation Conventions, thus leading to a higher number of disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities. After the approval of the Directive n. 2017/1852, many posed the (enthusiastic) conclusion with regard to this "new" legal measure to be far better than the procedures provided for by the existing DTCs and the EU Arbitration Convention and, thus, to meet its purpose of strengthening the taxpayers legal safeguard within international tax disputes. Throughout this research far more sceptical conclusions will be reached. Precisely, by taking as a landmark the EU Arbitration Directive and by comparing this “brand new” legal instrument with the other existing dispute resolution tools, this research will “test” the efficiency of the overall dispute resolution mechanisms framework and demonstrate that, although the arbitration Directive provides for some clear improvements, many (relevant) bottlenecks of the existing dispute resolution mechanisms have not been completely superseded. The research is structured in four chapters. The first chapter provides for some introductory notions on the existing mechanisms to settle international tax disputes. More specifically, the first chapter will: (i) describe the general functioning and – most importantly – the weaknesses of the mechanisms to settle international disputes that exist alongside the EU Arbitration Directive; (ii) examine how these mechanisms, together with the Directive, can effectively apply for the settlement of transfer pricing disputes; (iii) explore how (and if) these mechanisms can be twisted in order to prevent the rise tax disputes in the first place. Chapters II and III will examine whether (and in which terms) the Directive has strengthened the legal protection of taxpayers through an in-depth comparison of the procedural rules envisioned therein with the procedural rules envisioned under the other existing mechanism. More specifically, given that the Directive, as the other coexisting mechanisms, institutes a two-tier procedure, chapter II and chapter III will address the procedural rules envisioned under the existing dispute resolution tools that govern the functioning, respectively, of the first tier (the so called “mutual agreement procedure”) and of the second tier (the so called “arbitration procedure”). Finally, by taking as a landmark the Italian administrative and judicial tax legal system, chapter IV will address the many and complex issues arising from the interactions of the existing legal instruments to settle international tax disputes with domestic (administrative and judicial) remedies.
Dreyfuss, Lionel. "Le risque arbitral : arbitrage et justice de l'Etat." Thesis, Strasbourg, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015STRAA012.
Full textParties choosing arbitration are facing various risks. They are very different from the difficulties occurring within state justice. Identifying and assessing the level of those risks can be made possible by comparing those two forms of justice. Regarding the procedural guarantees, it appears that the parties are facing risks of a very weak importance. Arbitration is generally providing the same guarantees than state justice. Sometimes, they are even stronger : duty of disclosure, and reasonable time, for instance. However, the threats over the procedural efficiency are raising bigger problems : the arbitrator benefits from a liability regime far less favorable than the state judge. Moreover, arbitral tribunals' decisions do not constitute a case law. At last, arbitrators do not have any imperium merum powers. For instance, they cannot issue orders for the enforcement of their decision
Petrochilos, Georgios C. "Procedural detachment in international commercial arbitration : the law applicable to arbitral procedure." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2000. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:41c82c4d-d708-4cfe-b853-d50e41ea0773.
Full textSoltau, Salazar Sebastián. "Procedural effects of bad faith declared in an optional arbitration." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2014. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/108801.
Full textEl arbitraje potestativo en materia laboral permite que cualquiera de las partes de la relación de trabajo pueda forzar a la otra parte a someter sus diferencias a un Tribunal Arbitral. Uno de los supuestos de procedencia del arbitraje potestativo en materia laboral es que se advierta la mala fe de una de las partes durante la negociación del pliego, lo cual deberá ser probado.Ahora bien, ¿qué ocurre con aquella decisión del Tribunal Arbitral que admite a trámite la demanda y se declara competente para conocer el caso? En el presente artículo, el autor analiza los efectos procesales de esta decisión, a la luz de la doctrina y la jurisprudencia.
Higa, García Alfonso. "The Arbitration Clauses and the New Labor Procedure Law." Derecho & Sociedad, 2017. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/119111.
Full textEl presente artículo nos brinda una visión acerca del uso del arbitraje como método de resolución de conflictos alterno en el ámbito de los conflictos laborales, así, se desarrolla una mirada crítica sobre la posibilidad del uso del arbitraje que se encontraba regulada en la Ley Procesal del Trabajo y que, nuevamente, ha sido regulada en la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo. Para ello, el autor analiza las posiciones existentes tanto en la doctrina como en la jurisprudencia sobre la situación del arbitraje laboral en la Ley General de Arbitraje, luego de lo cual se analizará la regulación contenida en la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo.
de, la Jara José María, and Julio Olórtegui. "No pain, no gain: nine proposals to improve the future of international arbitration." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2018. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123872.
Full textLa figura del arbitraje internacional, es definida brevemente como un método de resolución de conflictos en el ámbito internacional alternativo a la Administración de Justicia destacando su neutralidad, rapidez y confidencialidad.Este artículo pone de manifiesto los nuevos retos que afrontan los árbitros, en cuanto a la elección, duración del proceso y eficiencia en la toma de decisiones.Además, propone nueve soluciones para mejorar el desempeño arbitral y acortar la emisión de decisiones.
Chappe, Nathalie. "Analyse economique d'une procedure de resolution des conflits : l'arbitrage." Besançon, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000BESA0003.
Full textYik, Chung Pang. "Critical assessment of arbitral procedures reform in China." access abstract and table of contents access full-text, 2008. http://libweb.cityu.edu.hk/cgi-bin/ezdb/dissert.pl?ma-slw-b2345426Xa.pdf.
Full text"Master of Arts in arbitration and dispute resolution (MAArbDR), LW6409 dissertation." Title from PDF t.p. (viewed on June 1, 2009) Includes bibliographical references.
Montoro, Marcos André Franco. "Flexibilidade do procedimento arbitral." Universidade de São Paulo, 2010. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2137/tde-16082011-161411/.
Full textThe object of the thesis is the flexibility of the arbitration proceeding, which is analysed based on the Brazilian arbitration legislation (Law 9.307/96). This thesis has been divided into four parts. The first part refers to some previous concepts. Arbitration, jurisdiction, (material) law, process and proceeding interrelation aspects are analyzed. The flexibility of judicial proceedings is reviewed, showing that the Brazilian proceedings are not as strict as it hás been stated, since there are rules that bend aspects of the system. General arbitration aspects are approached, such as its three phases, autonomy of will, full and empty arbitration clause and institutional and ad hoc arbitration. The second part deals with the two sides of the flexibility in arbitration proceeding, which is greater than that of judicial proceedings. There is, on one side, the possibility of creation of procedural rules in each arbitration, by the parties, by the arbitrator, by the arbitration organization, and by the judge. On the other side, there is the possibility of adaptation (modification) of the procedural rules of each arbitration, by the same people. The third part analyzes the limitations to creation and adaptation of procedural rules in arbitration. There are four groups of limits (minimal guarantees, references) to the creation and adaptation of procedural rules in arbitration. These four groups are: (i) good moral conduct and public policy (article 2, first paragraph, of Law 9.307/96); (ii) reasonable opportunity to present its case, equality, impartiality and judicial discretion principles (article 21, second paragraph, of Law 9.307/96); (iii) mandatory provisions of Law 9.307/96; and (iv) constitutional procedural principles. The fourth and last part encompasses the several possibilities of creation and adaptation of specific procedural rules. The procedural flexibility to create or adapt specific rules is analyzed, especially in association with: provocation to implement arbitration; articles 10 and 11 of Law 9.307/96; presentation of the allegations of the parties; claim stabilization; evidenciary phase; concession of urgent measures; and partial arbitration award.
Galanti, Lucilla <1987>. "Arbitrato e procedure concorsuali alla luce delle recenti riforme." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2017. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/8227/1/Galanti%20Lucilla%20tesi.pdf.
Full textThe dissertation focuses on the relationships between arbitration and insolvency proceedings (particularly, bankruptcy and arrangements with creditors) in the light of the recent legislation on the matter, in a procedural and comparative perspective.
Books on the topic "Procedure arbitrali"
Coțofană, Gheorghe. Procedura arbitrală: Istoric, doctrină, jurisprudență. București: Editura Oscar Print, 1999.
Find full textLa intervención judicial en el arbitraje: Recursos jurisdiccionales y ejecución judicial del laudo arbitral. [Madrid]: Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Madrid, 1988.
Find full textClaude, Lucas de Leyssac, ed. L' arbitrage. Paris: Dalloz, 1993.
Find full textPino-Ichazo, Raúl. Arbitraje iter procesalis. La Paz: [publisher not identified], 2013.
Find full textCremades, Bernardo María. Parallel state and arbitral procedures in international arbitration. Paris: ICC Publishing, 2005.
Find full textCentro de Consiliación y Arbitraje Comercial CAINCO, ed. Manual. conciliación y arbitraje. Santa Cruz: Cámara de Industria, Comercio y Servicios de Santa Cruz, 2004.
Find full textArbitraje: Arbitramento en derecho, en equidad, técnico, legal, institucional e independiente o ad hoc : el pacto arbitral, procedimiento, minutas y modelos. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia: Ediciones Doctrina y Ley Ltda., 2012.
Find full textPajardi, Piero. L' impugnazione del lodo arbitrale nella giurisprudenza. Milano: A. Giuffrè, 1992.
Find full textMaksimovich, A. I͡A. Arbitrazh v sisteme ministerstva, vedomstva. Moskva: "Nauka", 1987.
Find full textGorsky, M. R. Evidence and procedure in Canadian labour arbitration. Scarborough, Ont: Carswell, 1991.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Procedure arbitrali"
Lin, Yifei. "Arbitral Procedures." In China Arbitration Yearbook (2021), 115–31. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1284-9_6.
Full textOellers-Frahm, Karin, and Andreas Zimmermann. "ILC Model Rules on Arbitral Procedure of June 27,1958." In Dispute Settlement in Public International Law, 105–16. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56626-4_4.
Full textBao, Chiann. "Arbitral Procedure: Case Management and Selecting the Place of Arbitration." In Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy, 1–23. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5744-2_65-1.
Full textBao, Chiann. "Arbitral Procedure: Case Management and Selecting the Place of Arbitration." In Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy, 919–41. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3615-7_65.
Full textAdão, Telmo, Luís Magalhães, and Emanuel Peres. "Ontologies and Procedural Modelling." In Ontology-based Procedural Modelling of Traversable Buildings Composed by Arbitrary Shapes, 11–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42372-2_2.
Full textAdão, Telmo, Luís Magalhães, and Emanuel Peres. "Procedural Modelling Methodology Overview." In Ontology-based Procedural Modelling of Traversable Buildings Composed by Arbitrary Shapes, 37–47. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42372-2_3.
Full textAdão, Telmo, Luís Magalhães, and Emanuel Peres. "Procedural Modelling Methodology Evaluation." In Ontology-based Procedural Modelling of Traversable Buildings Composed by Arbitrary Shapes, 101–14. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42372-2_7.
Full textBurkart, Olaf, Didier Caucal, and Bernhard Steffen. "An elementary bisimulation decision procedure for arbitrary context-free processes." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 423–33. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60246-1_148.
Full textSynková, Sandra. "The Application of § 1032(1) of the German Code of Civil Procedure (Germany)." In Courts' Inquiry into Arbitral Jurisdiction at the Pre-Award Stage, 189–231. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00134-0_7.
Full textYunari, S. B. "The procedure of execution on foreign arbitral awards in Indonesia and issues." In Empowering Civil Society in the Industrial Revolution 4.0, 17–22. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003180128-4.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Procedure arbitrali"
Anderson, A. P., and G. G. Cook. "Incremental Propagation Procedure for Calculating Scattered Fields from Arbitrary Conductors." In 15th European Microwave Conference, 1985. IEEE, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/euma.1985.333482.
Full textScanlon, Thomas J., Jason M. Reese, and Lynne O’Hare. "A Procedure for Calculating Wall Distance in Arbitrary Microchannel Geometries." In ASME 4th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels. ASMEDC, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icnmm2006-96037.
Full textOrzechowski, Grzegorz, Aki M. Mikkola, and José L. Escalona. "Co-Simulation Procedure for Multibody Reeving Systems." In ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2018-86422.
Full textSalmeron-Ruiz, T., T. Diez-Ricondo, and M. Sierra-Castaner. "An optimization procedure for Radial Line Slot Antennas with arbitrary pattern." In 2014 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/eucap.2014.6902142.
Full textBerwaldt, Natan Luiz Paetzhold, Rafael Vales Bettker, and Cesar Tadeu Pozzer. "Procedural Generation of Favela Layouts on Arbitrary Terrains." In 2020 19th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGames). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sbgames51465.2020.00027.
Full textBrandsen, Sarah, Mengke Lian, Kevin D. Stubbs, Narayanan Rengaswamy, and Henry D. Pfister. "Adaptive Procedures for Discriminating Between Arbitrary Tensor-Product Quantum States." In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isit44484.2020.9174234.
Full textHernandez, Karla. "Cyclic stochastic optimization via arbitrary selection procedures for updating parameters." In 2016 Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ciss.2016.7460527.
Full textKubiak, A., B. Luniewicz, and F. del Angel. "Flow Analysis Procedure for Steam Turbines." In ASME 1991 International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/cie1991-0080.
Full textBellendir, K., and Hans A. Eschenauer. "Optimal Design of Composite Lightweight Rollers." In ASME 1993 Design Technical Conferences. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc1993-0386.
Full textKawasaki, Nobuchika. "Proposal of Determination Procedure About Fatigue Safety Factors for Arbitrary Best Fit Curves." In ASME 2003 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. ASMEDC, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2003-2193.
Full textReports on the topic "Procedure arbitrali"
Horrocks, Ian, and Stephan Tobies. Optimisation of Terminological Reasoning. Aachen University of Technology, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.25368/2022.99.
Full text