Academic literature on the topic 'Private use exceptions'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Private use exceptions.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Private use exceptions"
Boyd, Haleigh, Lewis Evans, and Neil Quigley. "Efficiency of Contractual Arrangements in Private Agricultural Product Markets." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 31, no. 4 (November 1, 2000): 813. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v31i4.5937.
Full textBishop, D. V. M., and S. J. Bishop. ""Twin Language"." Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41, no. 1 (February 1998): 150–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4101.150.
Full textKernt, Harold. "An Overview of the United States Administrative Procedure Act." Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, no. 2(46)/2020 (June 22, 2020): 69–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2020.2.05.
Full textTakenaka, Toshiko. "Patents for Sharing." Michigan Technology Law Review, no. 26.1 (2019): 93. http://dx.doi.org/10.36645/mtlr.26.1.patents.
Full textSlynn, Sir Gordon. "Le contrôle juridictionnel de l'action administrative devant les juridictions anglaises." Les Cahiers de droit 26, no. 4 (April 12, 2005): 863–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/042693ar.
Full textStephan, Paul B. "The Political Economy of Extraterritoriality." Politics and Governance 1, no. 1 (June 4, 2013): 92–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v1i1.89.
Full textWorthington, David. "The Settlements of the Beauly-Wick Coast and the Historiography of the Moray Firth." Scottish Historical Review 95, no. 2 (October 2016): 139–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/shr.2016.0293.
Full textWilson, C., R. Clarke, B. J. D'Arcy, K. V. Heal, and P. W. Wright. "Persistent pollutants urban rivers sediment survey: implications for pollution control." Water Science and Technology 51, no. 3-4 (February 1, 2005): 217–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0594.
Full textKaramian, Brian A., Gregory D. Schroeder, Martin Holas, Andrei F. Joaquim, Jose A. Canseco, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Lorin M. Benneker, et al. "Variation in global treatment for subaxial cervical spine isolated unilateral facet fractures." European Spine Journal 30, no. 6 (April 2, 2021): 1635–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06818-z.
Full textJütte, Bernd Justin. "Coexisting digital exploitation for creative content and the private use exception." International Journal of Law and Information Technology 24, no. 1 (December 31, 2015): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eav020.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Private use exceptions"
Lamlert, Wariya, and n/a. "International Uncertainty in the Exceptions for Individual Use in Copyright Law: A Comparative Study of Australia and Thailand." University of Canberra. School of Law, 2007. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20080912.140432.
Full textFriberg, Kristin. "The Swedish Implementation of the InfoSoc Directive : Emphasis on the Exception for Private Use." Thesis, Jönköping University, JIBS, Commercial Law, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-376.
Full textUpphovsrätten har alltid varit föremål för två motstående intressen, dels upphovsrättsinnehavarens intresse, dels det allmännas intresse. Det är upp till lagstiftaren att bibehålla denna balans och samtidigt förse båda parter med tillfredställande lösningar. De enheter som interagerar i denna balansakt för den här uppsatsen är: upphovsrätten i sig, undantag till och inskränkningar i upphovsrätten, Trestegsregeln vilken skall reglera undantagen och inskränkningarna samt skyddet av tekniska åtgärder. Den sistnämnda enheten är en indirekt reaktion på informationssamhällets ankomst där upphovsrättsskyddade verk kan kopieras digitalt samt spridas med minimal ansträngning. Det som utmärker informationssamhället är ett ökat antal av digitala intrång, särskilt över Internet, samt det faktum att kopian av verket helt motsvarar originalets kvalité. För att motarbeta piratkopiering i informationssamhället samt harmonisera medlemsstaternas olikheter gällande undantag till och begränsningar i upphovsrätten, har ett upphovsrättsdirektiv framarbetats. Sverige implementerade direktivet 1 juli, 2005 och syftet med den här uppsatsen är att undersöka huruvida implementeringen har upprätthållit eller förvrängt denna känsliga balansakt. Informationssamhällets ankomst har särskilt påverkat undantaget för privat bruk, dels p.g.a. att intrång från aktörer i denna sektor är svårkontrollerade, samt dels p.g.a. den olägenhet som ett intrång i användarnas privata sfär skulle utgöra. Utifrån det som behandlas i denna uppsats visar det sig att balansen har upprätthållits rent generellt, men att det även har uppstått särskilda effekter som kan orsaka, eller kan komma att orsaka en förvriden balans. Exempelvis har den svenska lagstiftaren intagit en mycket restriktiv ställning, inte bara gentemot digitalt privat bruk, utan även gentemot analog användning. Det framgår också att Trestegstestet och dess ställning i nationell lag kan vara beroende av lagstiftningstraditioner. Vidare riskerar verk som är föremål för förmånstagare av ett lagstiftat undantag till upphovsrätten, att låsas in p.g.a. skyddet av tekniska åtgärder. Problemet är relaterat till den svenska lagstiftarens val att inte implementera en bestämmelse för ett ikraftträdande av undantag för privat bruk. Generellt sett är detta problem mycket komplext vilket förhindrar en lösning på ett sådant här tidigt stadium.
Copyright has always been the subject of two conflicting interests, that of the copyright owner and that of the public. It is up to the legislator to maintain this balance in order to provide a solution somewhat satisfying for both parties. The constituent elements in the balancing act for this thesis are the copyright, the exceptions and limitations to the copyright, the Three-Step Test limiting the exceptions and limitations and the protection of technological measures. This last element is a reaction to the Information Society, where copyrighted work can be copied digitally and disseminated with minimal effort. An increasing amount of infringements, especially on the Internet, and the fact that the copy becomes identical in quality to the original have become typical for the Information Society. To combat piracy in the Information Society and to harmonise the discrepancies in the exceptions and limitations of the Member States’ national laws, the InfoSoc Directive has been issued. Sweden implemented the Directive on July 1, 2005 and the purpose of this thesis is to examine whether the implementation has maintained or distorted the delicate balancing act. The Information Society has affected the exception for private use in particular, partly because digital infringements in this sector are hard to control since the users are anonymous and partly because of the inconvenience of encroaching on the private sphere of the users. As concluded in this thesis, the balance has been generally maintained, however there are specific effects that may have caused or are capable of causing a distorted balance. For instance, the Swedish legislator has restricted not only digital private use, but also analogue private use. Moreover, the Three-Step Test and its impact in national law may be dependent on national legal traditions. Furthermore, works subjected to beneficiaries of the exception for private use, risk a lock-up because of the protection of technological measures. This problem is related to the Swedish legislator’s choice of not implementing an enforcement provision related to the exception for private use. As for this problem in general, its complexity prevents a solution at this stage.
Karapapa, Stavroula. "Private copying in the digital environment." Thesis, Brunel University, 2009. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12604.
Full textBihannic, Kévin. "Repenser l'ordre public de proximité : d'une conception hiérarchique à une conception proportionnelle." Thesis, Paris 1, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA01D087/document.
Full textAlthough case law has not entirely ruled out the theory of the “ordre public de proximité”, it’s scope has constantly been decreased to the point that it is now impossible to question it’s fall from grace. Hence pushing for a study of it’s future existence in the general theory of privateinternational law. In spite of recurrent criticism from Doctrine sources, the “ordre public de proximité” has not become useless. A renewed interpretation of its overall functioning is needed to overcome the fear of taking over the role of the public policy exception and therefore encouraging cultural relativism.However, considering the rehabilitation of the “ordre public de proximité” should not misguide us into thinking it is flawless. When confronted to the evolution of private interational law and a possible mutation of the public policy exception, the inadaptability of this principle becomesobvious. More specifically when transiting toward a logical ranking of values as necessairy for it’s effective functioning, one may fear a lack of consideration for the foreign norm. As a consequence, the “ordre public de proximité” seems to build itself outside of the public policytheory highlighting the need to consider it’s overcoming. Redefining the theory of the so-called “effet atténué” (limited effect) could represente an effective solution on condition that this system is founded on the balance of interest. In conclusion, if the “ordre public de proximité” cannot exist as an independent mechanism, the proximity condition must remain and support the development of proportionality as the reasoning method for the application of the so-called “effet atténué”
Fleutiaux, Johann. "Pour une réforme du statut de la copie privée en droit d’auteur." Thesis, Paris 2, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA020045.
Full textThe private copying’s faculty, admitted for a long time and contained in article L. 122-5 of the Code of Intellectual Property, is presented by the majority doctrine as an exception to copyright. It allows a person to duplicate a work for his personal use without having to seek the prior consent of the author and it is illustrated in two cases : the copy for his personal use made by the owner of a copy, which is easy to admit ; and the one made by a third party, including a borrower of the copy, which is also required. It is observed that private copying, because it does not make a communication to the public, must be considered as being outside the field of copyright, which finds here one of its limits. Recently, the legislature considered that, due to the evolution of the techniques, the private copy entailed a prejudice for the author. He has provided compensation to compensate him. Then, it was confined to the only copies of lawful source, while were reprimanded the copies of illicit source. But this penalty is poorly lived and little applied. And the lack of remuneration is unfair for the author. It would be good to remove the distinction between lawful and unlawful private copying. Compensation would then be extended to all private copies and the repression’s burden of unlawful private copying would be dispensed with. In the same time, it should be admitted that the author limits the number of private copies by contractual means, especially by using digital rights management, but without being able to totally prohibit this private copying’s faculty for the user
Books on the topic "Private use exceptions"
Chapdelaine, Pascale. Copyright User Rights. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198754794.001.0001.
Full textChoi, Mihwa. Burial. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190459765.003.0006.
Full textFerri, Giovanni, and Angelo Leogrande. Entrepreneurial Pluralism. Edited by Jonathan Michie, Joseph R. Blasi, and Carlo Borzaga. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199684977.013.2.
Full textSinclair, Thomas. The Power of Public Positions. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813972.003.0002.
Full textGillingham, Paul. Unrevolutionary Mexico. Yale University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300253122.001.0001.
Full textBaker, Jean H. Building America. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696450.001.0001.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Private use exceptions"
Maister, Bernard H. "8. Putting the ‘private’ into the ‘private and non-commercial use’ exception in patent law: what does it really mean?" In European Institute for Food Law series, 129–41. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-885-8_8.
Full textKarapapa, Stavroula. "Remunerated Exceptions." In Defences to Copyright Infringement, 259–300. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795636.003.0008.
Full textBently, L., B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, and P. Johnson. "9. Defences." In Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198769958.003.0009.
Full textAplin, Tanya, and Jennifer Davis. "13. Patents III." In Intellectual Property Law:. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198743545.003.0013.
Full textRosati, Eleonora. "Article 16—Claims to Fair Compensation." In Copyright in the Digital Single Market, 295–300. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858591.003.0017.
Full textFournet, Jean-Luc. "An Egyptian Exception?" In The Rise of Coptic, 1–39. Princeton University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691198347.003.0001.
Full textD’Andrea, Alessia, Fernando Ferri, and Patrizia Grifoni. "RFID Technologies in the Health Sector." In E-Health Technologies and Improving Patient Safety: Exploring Organizational Factors, 140–47. IGI Global, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2657-7.ch009.
Full textHamilton, Shane. "The Farms Race Begins." In Supermarket USA, 43–69. Yale University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300232691.003.0003.
Full textFriedman, David. "Private Prosecution and Enforcement in Roman Law." In Roman Law and Economics, 327–46. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787211.003.0021.
Full textWorster, Donald. "Private, Public, Personal: Americans and the Land." In Wealth of Nature. Oxford University Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092646.003.0011.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Private use exceptions"
Karaan, Anna Katrina. "Negotiating spaces of exception." In 55th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Beyond Metropolis, Jakarta-Bogor, Indonesia. ISOCARP, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.47472/aund2912.
Full textSperry, Benjamin R., and Curtis A. Morgan. "Review of State-Level Loan and Grant Funding Programs for Local Freight Rail Infrastructure." In 2013 Joint Rail Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/jrc2013-2479.
Full textRiis, Dan. "Developing Non-Gasoline Burning Outboard Motors for the UK MoD." In ASME 2005 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference. ASMEDC, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icef2005-1223.
Full textReports on the topic "Private use exceptions"
Pritchett, Lant, and Martina Viarengo. Learning Outcomes in Developing Countries: Four Hard Lessons from PISA-D. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE), April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-wp_2021/069.
Full text