Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Private ownership / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Private ownership'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Private ownership.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 19 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Private ownership.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Dorfman, Avihay. "PRIVATE OWNERSHIP." Legal Theory 16, no. 1 (March 2010): 1–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1352325210000042.

Full text

Abstract:

The most powerful response to growing skepticism about the intelligibility of the idea of private ownership has been cast in terms of an owner's rights to the exclusive use of an object. In these pages, I argue that this response suffers from three basic deficiencies—rather than merely explanatory gaps—that render it unable to overcome the specter of skepticism. These deficiencies reflect a shared want of attention to the normative relationship that ownership engenders between owners and nonowners. In place of the right to exclusive use, I set out to develop an account of private ownership that seeks to defeat skepticism concerning this idea. The proposed account insists that the idea of private ownership picks out a special authority relation between an owner and a nonowner involving the normative standing of the latter in relation to an object owned by the former. I further demonstrate the important place of this idea in shaping the contours of normative disagreements about the point of ownership rights and responsibilities.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Lemos, Ramon M. "Private Ownership." Teaching Philosophy 12, no. 1 (1989): 66–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/teachphil198912119.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Niskanen, Esko. "Private ownership of commons." Regional Science and Urban Economics 20, no. 2 (September 1990): 263–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(90)90008-q.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Shleifer, Andrei. "State versus Private Ownership." Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 4 (November 1, 1998): 133–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.133.

Full text

Abstract:

Private ownership should generally be preferred to public ownership when the incentives to innovate and to contain costs must be strong. In essence, this is the case for capitalism over socialism, explaining the 'dynamic vitality' of free enterprise. The great economists of the 1930s and 1940s failed to see the dangers of socialism in part because they focused on the role of prices under socialism and capitalism and ignored the enormous importance of ownership as the source of capitalist incentives to innovate. Moreover, the concern that private firms fail to address 'social goals' can be addressed through government contracting and regulation, without resorting to government ownership. The case for private provision only becomes stronger when competition between suppliers, reputational mechanisms, the possibility of provision by private not-for-profit firms, as well as political patronage and corruption, are brought into play.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Margaretha, Farah. "EFFECT OF OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE TO DIVIDEND POLICY IN COMPANIES IN INDONESIA." Business and Entrepreneurial Review 13, no. 2 (May 11, 2017): 199. http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/ber.v13i2.1849.

Full text

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of ownership structure on dividend payout policy in companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. In this study, there are 4 kinds of ownership structures that will be discussed, namely private ownership structure, government ownership structure, foreign ownerships structure and family ownership structure. Dividend payout policy uses DividndPayout Ratio (DPR) indicator Population of this study is all the companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 009-2011. Total samples in this study are 85 companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange determined by purposive sampling. Based on the study results, from the four ownership structures, only the private ownership structure influence Parliament. The implication for investors in doing this research, the investor can choose the private ownership structure of companies. for financial managers, this study provides information specifically on private companies that one way the companies reduce the agency problem could use dividend payout policy

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Breugem, Matthijs, and Raffaele Corvino. "Dynamic ownership and private benefits." Journal of Corporate Finance 67 (April 2021): 101881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101881.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Pichhadze, Aviv. "Private Equity, Ownership, and Regulation." Journal of Private Equity 14, no. 1 (November 30, 2010): 17–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2010.14.1.017.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Tully, James H. "Private Ownership. James O. Grunebaum." Ethics 98, no. 4 (July 1988): 852–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/293018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

NAWA, Kotaro. "Private ownership in public property." Journal of Information Processing and Management 49, no. 1 (2006): 46–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.49.46.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Rinaldi, Andrea. "Private ownership of public heritage." EMBO reports 7, no. 6 (June 2006): 571–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400720.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Sandler, Ronald. "Private Ownership and Common Goods." Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12, no. 2 (2005): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/pcw200512218.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Hwang, Joon Ho, and Bill Hu. "PRIVATE BENEFITS: OWNERSHIP VERSUS CONTROL." Journal of Financial Research 32, no. 4 (December 2009): 365–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2009.01254.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Clough, B. J. "Public access and private ownership." Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer 157, no. 2 (June 2004): 117–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/muen.2004.157.2.117.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

SHAH, SALMAN, and ANJAN V. THAKOR. "Private versus Public Ownership: Investment, Ownership Distribution, and Optimality." Journal of Finance 43, no. 1 (March 1988): 41–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02587.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Agustin, Hamdi, Sri Indrastuti, Amris Rusli Tanjung, and Muhammad Said. "Ownership structure and bank performance." Banks and Bank Systems 13, no. 1 (March 16, 2018): 80–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(1).2018.08.

Full text

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of banks in Indonesia. Specifically, this study has examined the static effect of ownership structure on bank performance in Indonesia over the period 1995–2006. The sample consists of 74 banks, namely 56 private banks, 15 community development banks (BPD), and three federal banks from 1995 to 2006. The data was analyzed using least-squares regression method, the general least squares method, and the method of random effects. The findings of this study show that the BPD performed better compared to private banks. This indicates that BPDs have better performance rather than private banks which is due to the fact that customers can be able to pay loans, they have special knowledge on that area and the performance of BPD is supervised by local government. In addition, the amount of equity, economic growth, financial crisis, and the financial ratios affect the performance of the bank. However, bank status has no effect on bank performance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Erturk, Ismail, Julie Froud, Sukhdev Johal, Adam Leaver, and Karel Williams. "Ownership matters: private equity and the political division of ownership." Organization 17, no. 5 (September 2010): 543–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508410372929.

Full text

Abstract:

This article returns to the issue of how ownership matters. It does so by developing a critique of the ‘advantage-value-return’ framework of assumptions about value creation from the product market, which are recurrent in resource based strategy and many other discourses that highlight what managers can do and the variable governance of management by owners. It then uses a case analysis of private equity and presents empirics which show how the financier general partners capture value so that general partners are enriched regardless of the performance of their investment funds. While private equity publicly claims to represent ownership with control for strategic decision making and operating efficiency, the undisclosed generic business model is the control of ownership through constructing a hierarchy of ownership claims for debt and equity suppliers in the capital market. Before or after the financial crisis that began in 2007, what matters is the position of the general partner as first among owners, not the motives, identity and actions of managers or the different suppliers of debt and equity.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Owens, Geoffrey Ross. "From Collective Villages to Private Ownership." Journal of Anthropological Research 70, no. 2 (June 2014): 207–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/jar.0521004.0070.203.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Grzybowski, Marian. "Ownership Right – Private vs. Public Aspect." Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego 34, no. 6 (December 31, 2016): 223–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2016.06.11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Xiaoqiang, Wang. "Transcending the Logic of Private Ownership." Chinese Economic Studies 23, no. 1 (October 1989): 43–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/ces1097-1475230143.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Vančatová, Marina, and Václav Vančata. "The biological roots of private ownership?" Anthropologia integra 9, no. 1 (June 30, 2018): 7–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/ai2018-1-7.

Full text

Abstract:

Formy vlastnictví některých objektů a jejich význam mohou být velmi variabilní, a to jak v různých lidských společnostech, tak i u ostatních primátů, zejména u velkých lidoopů. Sociální organizace lidoopů se liší v mnoha ohledech od většiny lidských společností. Naše studie lidoopů v zajetí by nám mohla pomoci vyřešit, zda mají lidoopi tendenci vlastnit libovolný objekt, nebo ne. Pozorování byla provedena ve dvou zoologických zahradách v České republice - Zoo Dvůr Králové a v Zoo Praha. Všechna popsaná pozorování prokázala skutečnost, že tendence k vlastnění objektů nesouvisejících s potravou existuje nezávisle na sobě u šimpanzů, goril a orangutanů. Velmi podobné údaje pro lidoopy chované v zajetí i pro divoce žijící lidoopy potvrzují, že tento typ chování není náhodný. To bylo opakovaně prokázáno u všech tří pozorovaných druhů lidoopů. Naše studie prokázaly, že existuje možnost interpretovat dlouhodobé individuální vlastnictví objektů během nepotravních aktivit u lidoopů i jako způsob osobního vlastnění těchto objektů.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Li, Jieping, Joan L. Walker, Sumeeta Srinivasan, and William P. Anderson. "Modeling Private Car Ownership in China." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2193, no. 1 (January 2010): 76–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2193-10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Campbell, Consuelo. "Private and State Ownership in Telecommunications." Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands) 64, no. 4 (August 2002): 371–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/174804850206400404.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Rus, Veljko. "Private and public ownership in Yugoslavia." Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies 2, no. 3-4 (May 1986): 187–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0281-7527(86)90015-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

FLEURBAEY, MARC. "An Egalitarian Democratic Private Ownership Economy." Politics & Society 21, no. 2 (June 1993): 215–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032329293021002005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Liu, Bo, Yang Liu, and Jinqiang Yang. "Optimal ownership structure in private equity." European Financial Management 24, no. 1 (April 25, 2017): 113–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12130.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Kerr, Gavin. "Private Economic Liberty and the Idea of Quasi-Private Ownership." Raisons politiques N�73, no. 1 (2019): 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rai.073.0103.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Moulin, Hervé, and John Roemer. "Public Ownership of the External World and Private Ownership of Self." Journal of Political Economy 97, no. 2 (April 1989): 347–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261606.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Clements, S. E., and M. S. Jamnick. "Some Considerations in Modelling Private Woodlot Timber Supply." Forestry Chronicle 66, no. 1 (February 1, 1990): 41–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5558/tfc66041-1.

Full text

Abstract:

Private woodlot owners have diverse backgrounds, ownerships, and forest management objectives. Among these management objectives timber production may be of secondary importance. The diversity of forest landowners and ownerships results in considerable uncertainty in availability of timber from these lands. In this paper we use a literature review to identify the variables and techniques that are important to determining timber supply from private woodlots. We also discuss how models designed for timber supply analyses under a single owner objective are invalid for modelling private woodlot timber supply, and suggest ways to modify existing timber supply models to incorporate ownership variability.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Cleaves, David A., and Max Bennett. "Timber Harvesting by Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners in Western Oregon." Western Journal of Applied Forestry 10, no. 2 (April 1, 1995): 66–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/10.2.66.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract A survey of nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) landowners in Western Oregon was analyzed to gain insights about their harvesting activity. Past participation in harvesting, harvest type, and future intentions for harvest were related to ownership size, tenure, residence, form of organization, method of acquisition, occupation, age, and income. Thirty percent of the respondents reported harvesting at least once during the 1979-1989 period. Higher rates of harvest participation were found for larger ownership sizes, longer tenure, corporate organization, farm ownership, and higher personal income. At least some of the influence of size on reported participation came from the natural tendency of larger ownerships to have a greater variety of acres eligible for harvest. Ownership size combined with a variety of demographic factors--tenure, residence, form of organization, acquisition method, occupation, and income--influenced whether the harvest was a clearcut or a commercial thinning. Commercial thinning and thinning/clearcutting combination harvests were more common than clearcutting. Landowners were generally willing to harvest in the future; more than two-thirds of the NIPF acreage is controlled by owners with definite harvest plans. Owners who reported no intentions to harvest had little past harvesting activity. The predominance of thinning and other forms of partial cutting by smaller NIPF owners may indicate opportunities to improve the condition of NIPFs through assistance in selective cutting. West. J. Appl. For. 10(2):66-71.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Indawati, Yana. "COMPLETE SYSTEM LAW REGISTRATION LAWS (PTSL) AS AN EFFECTIVENESS AND PRIVATE PROTECTION PRIVATE LAW PRIVATE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL OF PRASUNG SIDOARJO VILLAGE." VETERAN SOCIETY JOURNAL 1, no. 1 (May 7, 2020): 11–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.33005/vsj.v1i1.2.

Full text

Abstract:

Legal certainty in land ownership is proof of physical and non-physical ownership of land rights. The ownership of the certificate does not merely fulfill administrative requirements, and only formal evidence. The certificate as a proof of rights that acts as a strong proof of physical data and juridical data contained in it, as long as the physical data and juridical data are in accordance with the data in the relevant land certificate and land book. In general, the amount of land owned by the people of Prasung Village, Buduran District, Sidoarjo Regency, both for agriculture and for settlements is still not certified. Legal counseling on land registration is very important because the natural potential and the development of such a large industry will be even more optimal if the community land is certified. This legal education is very necessary to be made so that people become aware of the importance of ownership of land certificates especially the use of land in the village of Prasung is partly used for tourist areas, plantation land, agriculture, settlements and public facilities. The response of the people of Prasung Village, Buduran Subdistrict was very positive and enthusiastic. The community hopes that things which become obstacles in registering land can be overcome.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Hall, Curtis M., Benjamin W. Hoffman, and Zenghui Liu. "Ownership structure and auditor selection." Managerial Auditing Journal 35, no. 8 (August 31, 2020): 1121–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/maj-07-2019-2360.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effect that ownership structure (public vs private) has on the demand for high-quality auditors, specifically in the US banking industry. Design/methodology/approach The authors predict that public banks are more likely to hire a high-quality auditor than private banks and pay a higher audit fee premium for that high-quality auditor (due to higher agency costs, more demand for financial information and higher litigation risk). The authors analyze 2008–2014 banking data from the Federal Reserve using probit and OLS regression analysis to examine if there is a higher probability that public banks choose higher quality auditors and pay higher audit fees when they do so. Findings The results show that private banks are less likely to hire Big 4 auditors and industry-expert auditors than public banks. The authors also find that both private and public banks pay higher audit fees for Big 4 and industry-expert auditors, and that public banks pay a higher premium for Big 4 auditors and industry experts than private banks. Research limitations/implications The findings may not be fully generalizable to other types of firms, as banking is a heavily regulated and complex industry. However, inferences from this study may be generalizable to other similar industries such as insurance or health care. Practical implications The results of this paper imply that public and private banks have differing priorities when hiring their financial statement auditor. This may be of interest to investors and auditing regulators. Social implications The findings of this paper underscore the value of hiring an industry-expert auditor in an industry that is highly complex and regulated. This may be of interest to managers and policymakers. Originality/value Due to data restrictions, the emphasis of prior literature on the banking industry has been on public banks. This study is the first to analyze the differences between public and private banks’ demand for audit services.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Voss, Paul, and Marius Kulms. "Separating Ownership and Information." American Economic Review 112, no. 9 (September 1, 2022): 3039–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20211069.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper identifies an upside of the separation of ownership and control, typically the source of inefficiencies in the theory of the firm. Because insiders obtain private information by exercising control, the separation of ownership and control leads to a separation of ownership and information. We show that this separation is necessary for efficient trade in the market for corporate control. The analysis reveals how strategic communication between inside and outside shareholders facilitates takeovers by eliciting external bidders’ private information. Our results call into question mandatory disclosure requirements during takeovers. (JEL D21, D82, G32, G34)

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Abdul Manap, Nazura, Mohamad Rizal Abd Rahman, and Siti Nur Farah Atiqah Salleh. "HEALTH DATA OWNERSHIP IN MALAYSIA PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HEALTHCARE: A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF HEALTH DATA PRIVACY IN THE AGE OF BIG DATA." International Journal of Law, Government and Communication 7, no. 30 (December 31, 2022): 33–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.730004.

Full text

Abstract:

Health data ownership in big data is a new legal issue. The problem stands between the public and private healthcare as the main proprietor of health data. In Malaysia, health data ownership is under government hospitals and private healthcare jurisdictions. Who owns the data will be responsible for safeguarding it, including its privacy. Various technical methods are applied to protect health data, such as aggregation and anonymization. The thing is, do these technical methods are still reliable to safeguard privacy in big data? In terms of legal protection, private healthcare is governed under Personal Data Protection Act 2010, while the same Act does not bind the government. With the advancement of big data, public and private healthcare are trying to extract values from health data by processing big data and its analytical outcomes. Considering that health data is sensitive due to its nature which contains personal information of individuals or patients, had raised an issue as to whether the proprietor could provide adequate legal protection of health data. Personal Data Protection Act 2010 is still applicable in giving protection for health data for private healthcare, but what are the laws governing health data privacy in public healthcare? This article aims to answer the questions by analyzing legal sources relevant to health data privacy in big data. We propose a regulatory guideline that follows the GDPR as a legal reference model to harmonize the public and private healthcare ownership of health data better to protect the privacy of individuals in big data.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Nagubadi, Rao V., and Daowei Zhang. "Urbanization Effects on Timberland by Ownership Class: A Modified Multinomial Logit Analysis." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 34, no. 3 (August 1, 2010): 101–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/34.3.101.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract In this study, a modified multinomial logit approach is used to examine the determinants of timberland by ownership class using county level data in Georgia from 1972 to 2000. We model timberland use by private industry ownership and nonindustrial private forestland ownership, in addition to agriculture, urban uses, and other land uses. Urbanization and other socioeconomic variables have different levels of influence on timberland ownership classes, private forest industry, and nonindustrial private forestland owners. The findings may have implications for land use modeling and projections.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

O’Callaghan, Steve, John Ashton, and Lynn Hodgkinson. "Earnings management and managerial ownership in private firms." Journal of Applied Accounting Research 19, no. 4 (November 12, 2018): 648–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jaar-11-2017-0124.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate two related questions. First, is earnings management behaviour in private firms related to managerial ownership and if so, what form does the relationship take. Second, is there evidence of opportunistic earnings management behaviour in private firms. Design/methodology/approach This study uses univariate and multivariate (regression) methodologies to examine the association between managerial ownership and earnings management in private firms. The study employs a data set of 1,223 large private UK firms. Findings Evidence is presented indicating opportunistic earnings management behaviour in private firms. Specifically, firms with low managerial ownership appear to engage in more earnings management when faced with poor performance. Further, when firms report income-increasing discretionary accruals, the magnitude of abnormal accruals varies non-linearly with managerial ownership. Research limitations/implications This study is limited by availability of data on sample firm ownership. This study uses cross-sectional data due to these limitations. Further research could investigate the relationships between earnings management and classes of shareholders other than managers in private firms. Practical implications Policy implications of this work suggest that non-managing shareholders in private firms face considerable agency costs, in particular where managerial ownership is very low or very high. Originality/value Pervasiveness of earnings management in private firms compared to public firms is well documented in the literature. There is limited extant research on the relationship between ownership structure and earnings management in private firms. The novel aspect of this study is to present findings on the association between this behaviour, managerial ownership and firm performance in private firms.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Mijovic, Milan. "Private ownership in outer space: Still waiting?" Pravni zapisi 6, no. 2 (2015): 312–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-9641.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Rymma, Tsyliuryk. "PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF LAND FOR ORGANIC FARMING." Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law 9 (2019): 95–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2019.9.16.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Kay, John, James Foreman-Peck, and Robert Millward. "Public and Private Ownership of British Industry." Economic History Review 48, no. 2 (May 1995): 412. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2598426.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Dobrovolskii, A. A., and V. S. Pavlov. "Private forest ownership in the Russian Federation." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 876, no. 1 (October 1, 2021): 012024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/876/1/012024.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Hendrickson, Chris, and Tung Au. "Private versus Public Ownership of Constructed Facilities." Journal of Management in Engineering 1, no. 3 (July 1985): 119–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)9742-597x(1985)1:3(119).

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Besley, T., and M. Ghatak. "Government Versus Private Ownership of Public Goods." Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 4 (November 1, 2001): 1343–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265598.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Morley, J. B., R. G. Taylor, and L. J. Opit. "PATTERNS OF PRIVATE HOSPITAL OWNERSHIP IN VICTORIA." Community Health Studies 6, no. 1 (February 12, 2010): 25–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1982.tb00347.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Li, Shaomin, Ilan Vertinsky, and Dongsheng Zhou. "The emergence of private ownership in China." Journal of Business Research 57, no. 10 (October 2004): 1145–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00055-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Cumming, Douglas, Rejo Peter, Aurélie Sannajust, and Monika Tarsalewska. "Pre-Going Private Ownership Around the World." British Journal of Management 30, no. 3 (February 15, 2018): 692–711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12281.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Horwitz, Jill. "Nonprofit Ownership, Private Property, And Public Accountability." Health Affairs 25, Suppl1 (January 2006): W308—W311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.w308.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Mroz, Bogdan. "Poland's economy in transition to private ownership." Soviet Studies 43, no. 4 (January 1991): 677–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668139108411955.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Pradhan, Rohit. "Private Equity Ownership and Nursing Home Performance." Academy of Management Proceedings 2012, no. 1 (July 2012): 18188. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2012.18188abstract.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Dorfman, Avihay. "The Normativity of the Private Ownership Form." Modern Law Review 75, no. 6 (November 2012): 981–1009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00934.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Fraser, J., D. Oakley, and J. Bazuin. "Public ownership and private profit in housing." Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 5, no. 3 (December 13, 2011): 397–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsr036.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Ericsson, Magnus. "Statistics and Developments: Private versus State Ownership." Minerals & Energy - Raw Materials Report 21, no. 2 (June 2006): 4–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14041040601116989.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!