Relevant bibliographies by topics / Private forest landowner

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Private forest landowner'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 28 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Private forest landowner.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Private forest landowner"

1

Lutter, Seth H., Ashley A. Dayer, Amanda D. Rodewald, Darin J. McNeil, and Jeffery L. Larkin. "Early Successional Forest Management on Private Lands as a Coupled Human and Natural System." Forests 10, no. 6 (June 11, 2019): 499. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f10060499.

Full text
Abstract:
Facilitating voluntary conservation on private lands is a crucial element of policies that seek to mitigate forest habitat loss and fragmentation around the world. Previous research emphasizes the role of social factors (e.g., landowner characteristics, economics) in forest management, but environmental outcomes of past management can also affect landowner decisions. Our objective was to evaluate how positive outcomes for wildlife and habitat might reinforce or amplify landowner efforts to manage forest habitats. We applied the lens of coupled human and natural systems to investigate private lands management for early successional forests, which are declining along with associated wildlife in rural areas of the eastern U.S. Efforts to restore early successional forest in this region involve active forest management to create patches of successional forest in native, mature mixed hardwood stands. By integrating field-based monitoring of wildlife with surveys of landowner perceptions, we examined how landowners observed, interpreted, and responded to property-scale ecological outcomes of forest management. We recorded presence of Golden-winged Warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) and American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) and estimated bird species richness in spring 2015 and/or 2016 on private properties located in the Appalachians (Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania) and Upper Great Lakes (Minnesota, Wisconsin). These properties were enrolled in early successional forest management programs administered through the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Bird surveys were paired with landowner responses to a telephone survey conducted from January to May 2017 (n = 102). Most (71.6–81.6%) landowners’ perceptions of avian presence on their properties matched monitoring results. These perceptions were informed by personal observations and by outreach from agency partners and field technicians. Landowners who already completed their conservation program contracts (n = 85) continued managing early successional forests. Continued management for early successional habitat was positively associated with perceived benefits to birds, forest health, and scenery. Our findings give insight into how private landowners respond to environmental effects of forest management. We conclude that positive environmental outcomes of these conservation programs are related to continued early successional forest conservation by private landowners.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Potter-Witter, Karen. "A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Michigan Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners." Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 22, no. 2 (June 1, 2005): 132–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/njaf/22.2.132.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Incentive and assistance programs for nonindustrial private landowners in Michigan were evaluated for their effectiveness in encouraging forest management activities. This article reports on selected results of a comparative analysis of program enrollment, landowner characteristics, and management accomplishments. The analysis was based on data from a survey of 2,230 nonindustrial private forestland (NIPF) owners who were members of the Michigan Forest Association (MFA) or were enrolled in the Commercial Forest Program (CF), the Forest Stewardship Program (FSP), or the Two-Hearted River Watershed (TRW) landowner program in 2000. With a 55% overall response rate, landowners reported on present and past management activities and program enrollment. To address the question of the effectiveness of incentive programs, this comparative analysis tested the hypotheses that forest management activity reported by Michigan NIPF landowners who were enrolled in several types of incentive programs did not differ significantly by program and that management activity was not significantly explained by landowner demographics and parcel characteristics. Landowner program enrollment was compared with respect to tree-planting, timber harvesting, timber stand improvement, wildlife habitat improvement, and soil and water protection. To examine the differences, if any, between landowners who practice forest management and those who do not, explanatory demographic and parcel characteristic variables also were tested for their effect on management activity levels.North. J. Appl. For. 22(2):132–138.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hyberg, Bengt T., and Duncan M. Holthausen. "The behavior of nonindustrial private forest landowners." Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19, no. 8 (August 1, 1989): 1014–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x89-155.

Full text
Abstract:
Recent models of nonindustrial private forest landowner behavior have suggested that landowners seek nonmonetary as well as monetary returns from their forest investments. In this paper, landowners are modeled as maximizing utility, which is a function of income and nonpecuniary benefits. We explore the implications of this model for both harvesting and reforestation decisions, present empirical evidence that supports the model, and discuss some policy implications of the model.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Roberts, Scott D., and George R. Parker. "Ecosystem Management: Opportunities for Private Landowners in the Central Hardwood Region." Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 15, no. 1 (March 1, 1998): 43–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/njaf/15.1.43.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Ecosystem-based forest management approaches are being considered by forest managers and landowners throughout the United States. Being dominated by nonindustrial private forestland, the Central Hardwood Region poses some unique challenges to implementation of ecosystem management approaches. Patterns of ownership and land use make it difficult to incorporate many of the landscape-scale features of ecosystem management. In addition, the lack of institutional leadership among private landowners may hamper adoption of ecosystem-based management over any substantial portion of the region. Despite these challenges, there are factors favoring the use of ecosystem management in the region. Foremost among them is that private landowner objectives are often compatible with the goals of ecosystem management. The forests of the region are naturally quite diverse and possess the ability to recover from past management to provide many of the benefits of undisturbed forests. As more technical information becomes available concerning how to make ecosystem management approaches work, the prospect for adoption by some portion of private landowner community is encouraging. North. J. Appl. For. 15(1):43-48.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Rom, Ellen A., James C. Finley, and James R. Grace. "Using Direct Mail in Extension Programming for Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners." Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 7, no. 4 (December 1, 1990): 171–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/njaf/7.4.171.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Four pilot direct mail programs for nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) landowners were conducted in northwestern Pennsylvania. The programs varied in method of contact (targeting versus self-selection) and in type of information (economic versus multiple-use). The programs established contact with many landowners who had not been reached by past extension efforts. Type of information was not related to audience size, audience makeup, or program impact. Targeting reached more landowners than did the self-selection method, but self-selection maintained a greater percentage of these contacts. More of the landowners who selected themselves into the program than those who did not, and more of those who did not "drop out" of the targeted program than those who did, had past educational opportunities in woodland management. Direct mail was effective in increasing landowner knowledge of woodland management but less effective in developing landowner intent to manage woodland. North. J. Appl. For. 7:171-174, December 1990.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Metcalf, Alexander L., James C. Finley, A. E. Luloff, Richard C. Stedman, and Durland Shumway. "Progress in Private Forest Landowner Estimation." Journal of Forestry 112, no. 3 (May 1, 2014): 312–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-037.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Creighton, Janean H., and David M. Baumgartner. "Washington State's Forest Regulations: Family Forest Owners' Understanding and Opinions." Western Journal of Applied Forestry 20, no. 3 (July 1, 2005): 192–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/20.3.192.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Washington State has one of the most restrictive sets of Forest Practice Rules (FPR) in the United States. In 1974, the Washington State legislature passed the Forest Practice Act, with the intent of improving environmental conditions by regulating forest practices such as road building, harvesting methods, and the use of chemicals. We found that a knowledge gap exists within the private forest landowner community in Washington State with regards to some state and federal environmental regulations. The larger-acreage landowners with longer ownership tenures were more familiar with forest regulations than were the newer smaller-acreage landowners, based on a survey conducted in 2002. Regardless of regulation familiarity, a substantial number of respondents expressed concern over the limits placed on their ability to manage their lands as they see fit. This sentiment does not seem to arise purely from the potential for economic loss, because timber does not appear to be an important component of respondent incomes. Rather, the loss of management control and government restrictions placed on private property rights may be more significant. Agencies responsible for enforcing these regulations need to recognize that changes are taking place in the greater forest landowner community, and that the approaches of the past may no longer be appropriate for the future. West. J. Appl. For. 20(3):192–198.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Melfi, Frances M., Thomas J. Straka, Allan P. Marsinko, and Jeffrey L. Baumann. "Landowner Attitudes Toward South Carolina's Forest Stewardship Program." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 21, no. 4 (November 1, 1997): 158–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/21.4.158.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This study reports on a survey of 78 South Carolina nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) landowners who participated in the Forest Stewardship Program and an additional analysis of all South Carolina participants (n = 1,018) in 1994-1995. Timber production was the most common primary management objective; wildlife management ranked second. Participants were satisfied with the multiple-use emphasis of the program. Once a landowner evaluated the written management plan, timber production tended to increase in importance. The type of natural resource professional that developed the management plan appeared to affect the stated objectives of the NIPF landowner. Consultants and industry foresters tended to work with landowners who had larger acreages, timber management objectives, and previous forest management plans. Ninety-three percent of landowners said their management plan was useful. Another 87% support the concept of multiple-use. South. J. Appl. For. 21(4):158-163.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Nodine, Stephen K. "Reforestation delay tolerance under the Forestry Incentives Program." Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23, no. 3 (March 1, 1993): 414–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x93-059.

Full text
Abstract:
The USDA Forest Service Forestry Incentives Program provides private forest landowners with cost-share assistance to encourage reforestation. With an excess of applications over available program funds, many participating landowners have to delay reforestation until funds are available. During delays, costs accrue to landowners and future harvest revenues are postponed. Sixty-three percent of the applicants sampled in South Carolina encountered delays, although the average delay was only 1 year and less than 9% waited more than 2 years. Delays became more common and longer as site preparation costs increased. To assess a landowner's tolerance of these delays, an investment model was developed. This model compared a base situation, in which a landowner chose not to wait for assistance, with decisions to delay reforestation in order to receive assistance. Delay tolerance ranged from 1 year to more than 10 years, depending on site quality, reforestation cost, and discount rate. None of the sampled applicants were found to have incurred a net loss due to delays, based on actual site conditions and delays. Similar results can be expected in other regions and with other forms of landowner assistance that reduce the initial costs of stand establishment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Holley, A. Gordon, Eric L. Taylor, and William G. Ross. "Native American Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners in Southeastern Oklahoma." Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 32, no. 4 (November 1, 2008): 149–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/32.4.149.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This study attempts to characterize the Native American forest landowners in a three-county area of southeastern Oklahoma through a mail-out landowner survey. The total forestland owned by the survey respondents totaled to 12,211 ac with a mean of 140 ac. However, 56% of the respondents own less than 80 ac. More than one-half of the Native American respondents live on or adjacent to their forestland and only 17% are absentee landowners. Almost 60% of the landowners indicated personal reasons as their primary reason for owning their forestland followed by 19% for economic uses and 17% for recreational uses. Over one-half of these landowners indicated they have harvested their forest sometime in the past. Of the 45% that have not harvested their forest in the past, 31% indicated that either stumpage prices were too low or that their trees were not mature yet. Although most Native American forest landowners are involved in managing their forestland, lack of knowledge on forest management and harvesting strategies is an impediment to more effective, active management.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Private forest landowner"

1

Dedrick, Jason Paul. "Private Forest Landowners in Virginia and Ecosystem Management: An Analysis of Attitudes and Opportunities." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/31378.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to analyze landowner perceptions of an ecosystem management program proposed by The Nature Conservancy. This creation of this program, The Forest Bank, is an attempt to protect the unique ecological and biological resources of the Clinch River Valley of Southwest Virginia. This study analyzed the attitudes and characteristics of landowners that contribute to their decision to enroll in such a program. Data were collected by a 8-page mail questionnaire sent to 2000 landowners in a five-county area of Southwest Virginia. The final sample size resulting from this effort was 816 landowner surveys, representing an overall response rate of 45%. Two separate analyses were undertaken with respect to this data, each representing a unique and informative approach to landowners and The Forest Bank. The first analysis summarizes how landowners perceived the individual components of the program, their level of interest in enrollment, and what types of landowners would be most likely to express interest in such a program. Twenty-three percent of landowners expressed interest in enrolling in The Forest Bank at some time. In general, those interested in enrollment perceived the individual components of the program differently than those who were not interested in enrolling. Landowners who expressed enrollment interest were more likely to be younger, more affluent, more educated than those who did not express interest in enrollment. The second analysis employed a structural equation model in order to determine what attitudes and motivations influence attitudes toward an ecosystem management program such as The Forest Bank. Variables such as attitudes toward property rights, environmental attitudes, trust in sources of information, and level of community attachment were included in this model. Results indicate that while attitudes toward property rights and the environment were not as important as previous literature suggested, landowner reasons for owning land were key indicators in determining attitudes toward The Forest Bank. Results from this study provide valuable information to managers and researchers concerning landowner attitudes toward ecosystem management and their level of interest in enrolling in an ecosystem management program. This information will help managers better understand how landowners perceive individual components of these types of programs, as well as determining the types of landowners who would be interested in enrolling. These findings can then be used to tailor programs that are more consistent with landowner objectives, and to better understand the complex attitudes and characteristics of private forest
Master of Science
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Conway, M. Christine. "Targeting Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowner Groups for Timber Market Entry." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/28991.

Full text
Abstract:
This study models the timber market entry decisions of nonindustrial private landowners. It involves examining reservation prices both for harvesting timber from existing forest land and for afforestation of marginal agricultural and abandoned land. An important conclusion drawn from these models is that financial returns are not the only drivers of these decisions. Preferences for amenities derived from forests and farmland are also important. An empirical model follows which characterizes willingness to accept for various landowner groups in Virginia and Mississippi. We identify preferences and characteristics of landowners and features of forest sites that are important to the unobserved price specific to each landowner. Estimation results are also used to assess the size of payments needed to encourage harvesting or conversion from agricultural to forest uses with 50% probability. The determination of reservation prices for landowners in different regions aids in forecasting potential timber supplies from NIPF lands that are either actively managed for timber production or are not, as well as from marginal land not yet in forests, under different policy and pricing scenarios. Furthermore, it gives insight into evolving land use patterns.
Ph. D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Leitch, Zachary John. "PRIVATE LANDOWNER INTENT TO SUPPLY FOREST BIOMASS FOR ENERGY IN KENTUCKY." UKnowledge, 2012. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/forestry_etds/3.

Full text
Abstract:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky is taking steps to expand bioenergy production in response to federal policy initiatives as well as environmental and energy security concerns. The success of this industry will be impacted by the supply of feedstock available from private individuals who own a majority (78%) of forest resources in the state. Despite a developing body of bioenergy research, little is known concerning the social availability of forest biomass for energy production. This study measures intent to harvest energy wood among family forest owners using a mail-­‐based survey and tests the effect of educational materials provided to participants. The theory of planned behavior is used to model factors that affect landowner intentions. Two-­‐thirds of respondents reported that they intend to include energy wood in future harvests, but the educational material treatment did not affect intentions. Respondents’ attitudes, perceived subjective norms, and perceived control each had a significant effect on intent to harvest. Respondents also identified barriers that may prevent them from harvesting, providing forestry professionals with a list of challenges to overcome if supply is to be maximized. The results of this study are valuable for all stakeholders involved in the development of a sustainable biomass and bioenergy industry.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Sun, Xing. "Nonindustrial private forest landowner participation in incentive programs and regeneration behavior." Master's thesis, Mississippi State : Mississippi State University, 2007. http://library.msstate.edu/etd/show.asp?etd=etd-09242007-094521.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Crowther, Kevin Dion. "Economic factors influencing industrial landowner assistance programs on private forest land in the south /." This resource online, 1990. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05022009-040657/.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lutter, Seth Hendrik. "Human Dimensions of Young Forest Conservation Programs: Effects of Outreach, Post-Program Management, and a Coupled Systems Perspective." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/84544.

Full text
Abstract:
Achieving long-term conservation gains through the framework of conservation incentive programs requires an understanding of both the ecological and social components of these programs. Landowner program experiences and management decisions after program participation are important for long-term conservation, but these aspects of conservation programs are not well understood. To address this research gap related to conservation program participation, this thesis investigates Natural Resources Conservation Service programs that provide private landowners with financial and technical assistance to manage for young forest habitat in the eastern United States. We conducted a telephone survey to investigate private landowner experiences during and after participation in these NRCS conservation programs. Coordinating with biologists monitoring managed properties for birds, we assessed how in-person outreach and mailed monitoring results influenced landowners. Next, we evaluated how landowner motivations, resources, and cognitions were related to post-program young forest management intentions. Finally, we applied a coupled human and natural systems lens to investigate the linkage between wildlife outcomes, landowner perceptions, and continued young forest management. Our results demonstrate how in-person outreach can shape positive conservation experiences and increasing landowner trust in resource agencies. We also demonstrate the importance of both social and environmental factors for influencing landowner decision-making after conservation program participation. We detail the applications of this research for conservation agencies and professionals who work with private landowners.
Master of Science
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Crowther, Kevin D. "Economic factors influencing industrial landowner assistance programs on private forest land in the south." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 1990. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42416.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Starr, Sarah Elizabeth. "Factors Associated with Ohio Tree Farmers'; Forest Management and Outreach Needs." The Ohio State University, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1366145812.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Joshi, Sudiksha. "Nonindustrial private landowner's characteristics and their forest management decisions." Morgantown, W. Va. : [West Virginia University Libraries], 2007. https://eidr.wvu.edu/etd/documentdata.eTD?documentid=5365.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (M.S.)--West Virginia University, 2007.
Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains x, 102 p. : ill. Vita. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 84-90).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Smith, Nathan Ryan. "Federal Timber Income Taxes and Private Forest Landowners in the U.S." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/35159.

Full text
Abstract:
Recent concern has risen among forestry professionals that forest landowners are unaware of federal income tax provisions available to them that make forest management more cost effective. This concern specifically focuses on nine provisions. These nine provisions are: the treatment of timber income as capital gain, the deduction of annual management costs, depreciation of tangible property, the section 179 deduction, recovery of investment through depletion, the reforestation tax credit, amortization of reforestation costs over eight years, the exclusion of cost-share payments from gross income and deductions for casualty losses. The publication is divided into three major parts. In Part I the specifics of the nine provisions are covered in detail according to the current Internal Revenue Code. Current income tax rates are examined. The Passive Activity Loss Rules (PALS) are reviewed in terms of how they affect landowner eligibility to use the nine provisions for current loss deductions. PALS limitations incurred by holding forestland as a passive trade or business, or active trade or business are examined. Advantages and disadvantages to holding forestland as an investment are also examined. In Part II, the effects of timber income taxes on forestland investments are explored. Examples of taxes incurred (including the alternative minimum tax) when timber is sold are given. Tax calculations are based on a typical southern landowner involved with the management of a loblolly pine plantation. In Chapter 6, effects of using the nine income tax provisions on the land expectation value (LEV) of a typical forestland tract are examined for a high-income forest landowner and a low-income forest landowner engaged in both intensive and non-intensive loblolly pine management in the South. Cumulative effects of using or not using the nine income tax provisions in each regime are shown to dramatically influence LEV, and the importance of tax provision awareness is emphasized. In Chapter 7, the complexity of complying with timber tax law is examined. This chapter' s purpose is to provide an example of the detail involved in taking advantage of the tax laws. A demonstration of tax complexity is made with income tax calculations for the medium-income landowner in Chapter 6. The landowner first thins his 120-acre plantation in tax year 2003, and forms required by the IRS to use the tax provisions are identified and discussed. Although use of the provisions is essential for maximum economic returns, their complexity can discourage landowners from electing to use them. Part III presents the results and discussion of a mail survey sent to members of the American Tree Farm System (ATFS). In the survey questionnaire, landowners were asked if they were aware of the nine tax provisions, and if they used them where applicable. They were also asked why they failed to use certain provisions when they know about them. Various hypotheses are tested in Chapter 13. The demographics of ATFS members are compared with the demographics of the general U.S. forest landowner population as described by Birch (1996). The ATFS population was more timber production as well as more land investment oriented. ATFS members have significantly more harvesting experience than the general landowner. Tree Farmers typically own larger parcel sizes than the average landowner. ATFS members belong to a forestry organization, and ATFS members are more motivated in terms of forest management than the typical landowner. The results show that ATFS awareness and use of the tax provisions are low. Thus, increased efforts by natural resource professionals to inform landowners of their tax options are indicated. Caution should be used when interpreting survey results, because over 70% of ATFS members use tax professionals to file their income taxes. Consequently, actual use of tax provisions could be higher than predicted if the tax professionals are well versed in dealing with timber income.
Master of Science
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Private forest landowner"

1

Carpenter, Eugene M. The private forest landowners of Michigan. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Carpenter, Eugene M. The private forest landowners of Michigan. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Carpenter, Eugene M. The private forest landowners of Michigan. St. Paul, Minn. (1992 Folwell Ave., St. Paul 55108): U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Leatherberry, Earl C. Wisconsin private timberland owners, 1997. St. Paul, Minn: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Leatherberry, Earl C. Wisconsin private timberland owners, 1997. [St. Paul, Minn.]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rosson, James F. Profiles of midsouth nonindustrial private forests and owners. New Orleans, La: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Leatherberry, Earl C. Private timberland owners of Michigan, 1994. St. Paul, Minn. (1992 Folwell Ave., St. Paul 55108): U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Moore, James A. Fertilizing Eastern Washington coniferous forests: A guide for nonindustrial private forest landowners. [Pullman, Wash.]: Cooperative Extension, Washington State University, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Carpenter, Eugene M. Ownership change and timber supply on nonindustrial private forest land. St. Paul, Minn: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Dennis, Donald F. Factors influencing recreational use of private woodland. [Radnor, Pa.] (100 Matsonford Rd., Suite 200, P.O. Box 6775, Radnor 19087): U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Private forest landowner"

1

Hayes, Deborah C., Becky K. Kerns, Toral Patel-Weynand, and Deborah M. Finch. "Introduction." In Invasive Species in Forests and Rangelands of the United States, 1–3. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45367-1_1.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractInvasive species are a historical, long-term, and continually growing threat to the ecology, economy, and infrastructure of the United States. Widely recognized as one of the most serious threats to the health, sustainability, and productivity of native ecosystems, invasive species issues have commonly been viewed as problems specific to Federal, State, and private landowners. However, it is increasingly apparent that the impacts from these species are all encompassing, affecting ecosystem processes in addition to the economics of land management, public and private infrastructure, the energy sector, international trade, cultural practices, and many other sectors in the United States.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"D—Conservation Agreement between Soil Conservation District and Landowner." In The Small Private Forest in the United States (Routledge Revivals), 181. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315718897-20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"7. Perspective: Forest Conservation and Private Landowners." In Proactive Strategies for Protecting Species, 61–70. University of California Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/9780520960497-010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

"Non-Industrial Private Landowners Appendix 9A: Myths and Fallacies in the Tradition." In The Global Economics of Forestry, 336–67. Routledge, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203122693-16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"Impact of Voluntary Carbon and Bioenergy Markets on Non-Industrial Private Forest Landowners' Profitability." In The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization, edited by Puneet Dwivedi, Janaki Alavalapati, Douglas Carter, and Sherry Larkin, 170–82. BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/978160805233211101010170.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"From Catastrophe to Recovery: Stories of Fishery Management Success." In From Catastrophe to Recovery: Stories of Fishery Management Success, edited by Robert M. Hughes, Brian L. Bangs, Stanley V. Gregory, Paul D. Scheerer, Randall C. Wildman, and Jeffrey S. Ziller. American Fisheries Society, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.47886/9781934874554.ch7.

Full text
Abstract:
<i>Abstract.</i>—Fish assemblages in the Willamette River basin (Oregon) were once substantially degraded by water pollution, channelization, dams, nonnative fish, and conversion of natural forest and savanna to agriculture and urbanization. Restoration actions have included basinwide waste treatment, physical habitat rehabilitation, recovery of the Oregon Chub <i>Oregonichthys crameri</i> to stable status, and stocking reductions of nonnative fish to protect native fish. State and federal sewage treatment regulations and funding, federal endangered species regulations and funding, and reduced funding and support for stocking nonnative trout led to those rehabilitated fish assemblages. Periodic fish and habitat monitoring has documented the following improvements in fish assemblages: (1) decreased occurrences of pollution-tolerant species and increased occurrences of pollution-sensitive species and native main-stem species, (2) increased number of abundant Oregon Chub populations, and (3) persistence of resident native Rainbow Trout <i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>. Notably, no known extinctions of native fish species have occurred in the Willamette River, water quality index scores in the lower river have improved from poor to fair, and water quality in the upper river remains good to excellent. In conclusion, enactment of laws and regulations for environmental protection and the collective actions of state and federal agencies, tribes, municipal governments, universities, land trusts and conservation groups, watershed councils, and private landowners have led to a substantially rehabilitated river. However, population and economic growth, climate change, nonnative fish, winter steelhead (anadromous Rainbow Trout) and spring Chinook Salmon <i>O. tshawytscha</i> listings, a superfund site, channel alterations, toxic substances, poor fish passage at dams, and altered flow regimes remain challenges. Four lessons learned are that (1) pollution control and improved water quality and flows are essential to the recovery and persistence of native fish populations, (2) recovery of endangered species is achievable but requires knowledge of their life history needs, (3) the greater ecological fitness of native stocks facilitates their persistence, and (4) research and monitoring, combined with public communication and collaboration, are essential for habitat and native fish assemblage rehabilitation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Private forest landowner"

1

"Woodcock is Not a Dirty Word! Using Interest in Wildlife to Engage Private Forest Landowners." In Eleventh American Woodcock Symposium. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/aws.0112.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Private forest landowner"

1

Carpenter, Eugene M., and Mark H. Hansen. The private forest landowners of Michigan. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/nc-rb-93.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Carpenter, Eugene M., Mark H. Hansen, and Dennis M. St. John. The private forest landowners of Minnesota--1982. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/nc-rb-95.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Private forest landowner' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography