Relevant bibliographies by topics / Principle of Right / Books

Books on the topic 'Principle of Right'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Principle of Right.
Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Principle of Right.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

The ethics of cosmology: Natural right and the rediscovery of design. New Brunswick, N.J: Transaction Publishers, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Akkermans, Bram. The principle of numerus clausus in European property law. Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Akkermans, Bram. The principle of numerus clausus in European property law. Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Maastrichts Europees Instituut voor Transnationaal Rechtswetenschappelijk Onderzoek., ed. The principle of numerus clausus in European property law. Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ann, Turrisi Patricia, ed. Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking: The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

The ETTO principle: Efficiency-thoroughness trade-off : why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Chan, Joseph Man. Education and principle-based opinion: A study of the right of abode controversy in Hong Kong. Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Borden, Merritt William. Coping with life the principle way: A plain-English common sense approach to solving the problems of everyday living. Eugene, Or: Diogenes' Pub. Co., 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Canada. Dept. of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. and Tungavik Federation of Nunavut, eds. Agreement-in-principle between the Inuit of the Nunavut settlement area and Her Majesty in Right of Canada. Ottawa: Indian Affairs and Northern Development, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

The God hypothesis: Discovering design in our "just right" Goldilocks universe. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

McLoughlin, William J. Issues of principle in educational provision for children with disabilities with particular reference to children with Down Syndrome. Dublin: University College Dublin, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Wu quan xing wei wu yin xing li lun yan jiu: Study on principle of abstraction of juristic act of real right. Beijing Shi: Zhongguo zheng fa da xue chu ban she, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Dermot, Groome. Part II The Right to Know, A General Principles, Principle 2 The Inalienable Right to the Truth. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 2 is concerned with the inalienable right to truth, a right that arises from the right to know and obliges governments to establish mechanisms to facilitate the revelation of the truth about serious violations of human rights. The right to truth has been explicitly incorporated into several international instruments and, in 2010, became expressly guaranteed in the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICPPED). In practice, the right to truth is realized through laws enabling requests for state-held information; archives; truth commissions; national and international courts; and human rights commissions. After providing a contextual and historical overview of Principle 2, this chapter describes its normative (legal/ethical) foundation, focusing on how its interpretation is influenced by international law and how it relates to notions of transitional justice. It also analyzes the applications of the Principle in practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Dermot, Groome. Part II The Right to Know, A General Principles, Principle 4 The Victims’ Right to Know. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 4 deals with the victims’ right to know, which is most often exercised in conjunction with Principle 2, the right to truth. This principle not only guarantees families to know the ultimate fate of relatives but also requires a full and fair exposition of what happened, including the existence of human rights violations. The right to know was first articulated in Article 32 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions and has evolved as a principle of customary international humanitarian law. Principle 4 recognizes the basic human need for families to know the fate of missing loved ones and is best understood as a right extending humanitarian protection to families of the missing. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 4 before discussing its theoretical framework and the ways in which the right to know is exercised in practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Lucas S, Grosman. Part IV The Right to Reparation/Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, A The Right to Reparation, Principle 34 Scope of the Right to Reparation. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0038.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 34 deals with the scope of the right to reparation, which includes restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, and satisfaction. In order to determine what each measure entails, the Impunity Principles should be read in conjunction with the Reparation Principles, adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 60/147 of 16 December 2005. Principle 34 also outlines the content of certain rights owed to families of victims of forced disappearance, namely: the right to be informed of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared and the right to obtain the body of the victim, once it has been identified. These rights have a substantial and a remedial dimension, and thus contribute to the reparation of the harm. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 34 before discussing its theoretical framework and practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Getting Energy Prices Right: From Principle To Practice. International Monetary Fund, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Heine, Dirk, Eliza Lis, Shanjun Li, and Ian Parry. Getting Energy Prices Right: From Principle to Practice. International Monetary Fund, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Parry, Ian Wh. Getting Energy Prices Right: From Principle to Practice. International Monetary Fund, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

DeVinck, Robert. Pono Principle: Doing the Right Thing in All Things. Balboa Press, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Write It Right (Principle Works of Ambrose Gwinett Bierce). Reprint Services Corporation, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Lisa J, Laplante. Part IV The Right to Reparation/Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, A The Right to Reparation, Principle 33 Publicizing Reparation Procedures. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0037.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 33 focuses on the obligation of the State to publicize ‘ad hoc procedures’ for the distribution of reparations. The ‘publicity principle’ assures the right to compensation, restitution, non-material, symbolic reparations and other remedies and places the onus on policymakers to implement outreach campaigns that inform victims of these right and how to access them. Principle 33 emanates from the idea that ‘a reparation mechanism has little practical value if potentially eligible victims are not aware of the opportunity to make claims or are not given timely information on how to do so in a language they can understand’. After providing a contextual and historical background on Principle 33, this chapter discusses its legal framework and practice, with emphasis on United Nations guidelines and principles; international mass claims processes; international courts, commissions and committees; and country specific practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Thomas, Unger. Part II The Right to Know, A General Principles, Principle 5 Guarantees to Give Effect to the Right to Know. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 5 outlines guarantees that States must take to give effect to the right to know, including judicial and non-judicial mechanisms. This principle focuses on courts, truth commissions and archives, and gives a privileged position to criminal justice. It follows a clear human rights understanding on how guarantees should look like in the fight against impunity. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 5 before discussing its theoretical framework and some practical trends regarding the guarantees designed to give effect to the right to know. It highlights a number of limitations of Principle 5 and proposes a revised version, calling for a more dynamic functional approach that creatively looks at what kind of existing and new interventions could take on the function of guarantees to give effect to the right to know.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Pierre, d’Argent, and de Ghellinck Isabelle. Part IV The Right to Reparation/Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, A The Right to Reparation, Principle 32 Reparation Procedures. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0036.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 32 deals with the procedural aspect of the right to reparation, that is, the right for victims of human right violations to access remedial procedures. It addresses three issues: the right to access remedial procedures, procedural requirements of national reparation programmes, and regional and international procedures. While the obligation of states to provide effective remedies is enshrined in most of, if not all, the key international human rights treaties, Principle 32 provides for a right to all victims to access remedies. ‘Reparation’ and ‘remedies’ are both envisioned as victims’ rights, but the distinction between them is vague. After providing a contextual and historical background on Principle 32, this chapter discusses its theoretical framework and how the reparation procedure, judicial or administrative, dealing with gross violations of human rights at national or international level has been implemented.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

DeVinck, Robert. The Pono Principle: Doing the Right Thing in All Things. Balboa Press, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Tilford, Tilli A. The 12 Characteristics of God's Mr. Right (Using the "Boaz" Principle). Poole & Smith Publishing, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Julia, Viebach. Part II The Right to Know, A General Principles, Principle 3 The Duty to Preserve Memory. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 3 is concerned with the duty to preserve memory, which falls under the rubric of ‘the right to know’. This principle recognizes the role of collective memory in transitional processes, attests to a people’s right to know ‘the history of its oppression’ as part of its heritage, and calls upon the state’s duty to preserve archives and other evidence. This chapter first provides a historical background and an overview of the contemporary context in which Principle 3 is applied before outlining its normative framework, focusing on case law and truth commissions. It also analyzes the applications of the Principle in practice and argues that the duty to preserve memory has only implicitly been addressed under either symbolic reparations in truth-seeking processes or under satisfaction in jurisprudence. It contends that this approach over-simplifies the collective and societal level and neglects the dangers and complexity of memorialization in transitional contexts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Catherine, Harwood, and Stahn Carsten. Part II The Right to Know, B Commissions of Inquiry, Principle 13 Publicizing the Commission’s Reports. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0017.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 13 deals with the publication of the commission’s reports. The principle of publicity is a key component of the United Nations’ Updated Impunity Principles. Through full publication and wide dissemination of a report, the right to the truth is realized. An authoritative account of violations might also promote accountability and reconciliation. A final report should be widely accessible, taking into consideration cultural and technological contexts. However, commissions may receive information confidentially and exclude some information from reports for security reasons and to avoid interference with witnesses and commissioners. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 13 before discussing its theoretical framework and how commissions have adopted confidentiality measures to protect witnesses and victims.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Separation of Church and State: Founding Principle of Religious Liberty. Mercer University Press, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Frank, Haldemann. Part IV The Right to Reparation/Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, A The Right to Reparation, Principle 31 Rights and Duties Arising Out of the Obligation to Make Reparation. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0035.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 31 deals with rights and duties arising out of the obligation to make reparation. It reflects a significant trend in recent international affairs: the call for ‘reparations’ as a means of ‘correcting’ legacies of serious and widespread human rights abuses. The idea of a general individual right as codified in Principle 31 is consistent with existing international law, but arguably has no strong legal basis. The Principle opens with a strong normative claim: ‘Any human rights violation gives rise to a right to reparation’. This claim is far from self-explanatory and raises a variety of questions about its meaning and foundations, such as the question of what it is to have a right to reparation. After providing a contextual and historical background on Principle 31, this chapter discusses its theoretical framework and highlights some of the legal, and predominantly international practices relevant to the Principle.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Giulia, Pinzauti. Part III The Right to Justice, C Restrictions on Rules of Law Justified By Action to Combat Impunity, Principle 22 Nature of Restrictive Measures. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0026.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 22 is an overarching guideline to states on the nature of the safeguards and restrictions that they may need to adopt and enforce in order to counter impunity more effectively. It is an umbrella provision listing certain rules or principles in national legal systems which might impede the criminal prosecution or other scrutiny of human rights violations by domestic courts. These rules and principles include those regulating amnesty, prescription (statutory limitations), extradition, the right to asylum, due obedience, repentance, the jurisdiction of military courts and the irremovability of judges. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 22 before discussing its theoretical framework and how the safeguards or restrictive measures outlined in Principle 22 have been applied in practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Lee, Daniel. The Right of Sovereignty. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755531.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Sovereignty is the vital organizing principle of modern international law. The Right of Sovereignty examines the origins of that principle in the legal and political thought of its most influential theorist, Jean Bodin (1529/30–1596). As Daniel Lee argues in this study, Bodin’s most lasting theoretical contribution was his thesis that sovereignty must be conceptualized as an indivisible bundle of legal rights constitutive of statehood. While these uniform ‘rights of sovereignty’ licensed all states to exercise numerous exclusive powers, including the ‘absolute power’ to ‘absolve’ and release its citizens from legal duties, they were ultimately derived from, and therefore limited by, the law of nations. The book explores Bodin’s creative synthesis of classical sources in philosophy, history, and the medieval legal science of Roman and canon law in crafting the rules governing state-centric politics. The Right of Sovereignty is the first book in English on Bodin’s legal and political theory to be published in nearly a half-century and surveys themes overlooked in modern Bodin scholarship: empire, war, conquest, slavery, citizenship, commerce, territory, refugees, and treaty obligations. It will interest specialists in political theory and the history of modern political thought, as well as legal history, the philosophy of law, and international law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Howard, Varney. Part II The Right to Know, B Commissions of Inquiry, Principle 11 Adequate Resources for Commissions. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0015.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 11 guarantees adequate resources in support of a commission of inquiry so that it can comply with its legal mandate without compromising its independence and autonomy. A commission with autonomy means that it has control over its own finances and may make its own decisions in respect of the allocation of its resources. The issue of autonomy is inextricably linked to the independence of a commission. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 11 before discussing its theoretical framework, focusing on international law instruments governing the investigation of human rights violations that oblige state parties to adequately resource the responsible investigative agency. In particular, it considers the role of competent authorities, explicit duty, funding principles, and political will. It also examines how commissions of inquiry have been supported in practice and cautions against proceeding with commissions where adequate support is not guaranteed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

-J, Proudhon P., and Amedee Jerome Langlois. What Is Property?: An Inquiry Into the Principle of Right and of Government. Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

-J, Proudhon P., and Amédée Jérôme Langlois. What Is Property?: An Inquiry Into the Principle of Right and of Government. Franklin Classics, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

-J, Proudhon P. What Is Property?: An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government. HardPress, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Proudhon, P. J. What Is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government. Loki's Publishing, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

-J, Proudhon P., and Amedee Jerome Langlois. What Is Property?: An Inquiry Into the Principle of Right and of Government. Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

The Kim Kardashian principle: Why shameless sells (and how to do it right). St. Martin's Press, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Kyritsis, Dimitrios. Are Courts the Forum of Constitutional Principle? Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672257.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines a number of positions that defend the legitimacy of constitutional review on grounds of a special connection between courts and fundamental rights. It starts by insisting that the issue cannot be settled by appeal to any constitutional logic but must make reference to political morality. It then critically assesses the view that sees in courts a forum for the realization of a general procedural right to lodge complaints against political decisions setting back our interests. Such a procedural right, though, is dubious and does not straightforwardly apply to constitutional design. The chapter then turns to Ronald Dworkin’s thesis that courts ought to decide questions of principle and not policy and are better suited for this purpose than legislatures. However, this thesis cannot account for the dependence of the judicial role on legislative decisions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Alexander, Mayer-Rieckh, and Duthie Roger. Part IV The Right to Reparation/Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, B Guarantees of Non-Recurrence of Violations, Principle 35 General Principles. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0039.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 35 deals with guarantees of non-recurrence of human rights violations, along with some general principles and objectives. It outlines ‘institutional reforms and other measures’ as the means of achieving prevention through their contribution to the rule of law, respect for human rights, and public trust in government institutions. It also highlights the importance of adequate representation of women and minority groups as well as broad public consultation in the process. Four ‘objectives’ are listed in Principle 35: the first repeats the notion of the rule of law and the next three refer to specific measures that are among those included in Principles 36–38. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 35 before discussing its theoretical framework and practice. It concludes with a critical assessment of the notion of guarantees of non-recurrence itself.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Gilbert, Margaret. Problems with Moral Principle Accounts. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813767.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
In offering accounts of the obligation accrued by a promisor on the basis of his promise some theorists invoke a social convention or practice of promising and some do not. Promise theorists of both types generally assume that the primary obligation of a promisor is a moral requirement derived from a moral principle. Taking Thomas Scanlon’s prominent practice-independent account as its focus, this chapter argues that moral principle approaches cannot account for the inevitability of a promisor’s obligation. Nor can they account for its directedness. They cannot therefore account for a promisee’s demand-right which is equivalent to the directed obligation of his promisor. The demand-right problem for promises, therefore, remains unsolved.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Hollnagel, Erik. ETTO Principle : Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Hollnagel, Erik. ETTO Principle : Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Hollnagel, Erik. ETTO Principle : Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Hollnagel, Erik. ETTO Principle : Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Alison, Bisset. Part II The Right to Know, B Commissions of Inquiry, Principle 8 Definition of a Commission’s Terms of Reference. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0012.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 8 provides for the creation of strong commissions with clear terms of reference that ensure delineation between their role and that of courts. However, it offers no guidance on how to coordinate the proceedings of commissions. Indeed, the Principle’s stipulations that commissions should possess quasi-judicial powers and the abilities to investigate all violations increases the likelihood of overlap in investigations and, therefore, the potential for operational tension. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 8 before discussing its theoretical framework and how the requirements of Principle 8 are reflected in modern practice. It highlights the practical difficulties associated with endowing commissions with wide mandates and truth-seeking powers, where there are also efforts to pursue criminal justice, by citing the experiences of South Africa, East Timor and Sierra Leone.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Cosmic Jackpot: Why Our Universe Is Just Right for Life. Houghton Mifflin, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

What is What is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government. What Is Property? an Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government: Luxurious Edition. Independently Published, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

What is What is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government. What Is Property? an Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government: Royal Edition. Independently Published, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

What is What is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government. What Is Property? an Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government: Luxurious Edition. Independently Published, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Principle of Right' for other source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography