Academic literature on the topic 'Principio di affidamento'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Principio di affidamento.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Principio di affidamento"
Castellani, Cesare. "Essere madri nella separazione." MINORIGIUSTIZIA, no. 3 (January 2021): 93–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/mg2020-003010.
Full textForslund, Tommie. "L'attaccamento va in tribunale: protezione e affidamento dei minori." QUADERNI DI PSICOTERAPIA COGNITIVA, no. 50 (August 2022): 25–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/qpc50-2022oa14082.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Principio di affidamento"
Azzariti, Antonella <1978>. "I principi generali in materia di affidamento dei contratti pubblici." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2007. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/120/1/TESI_Dottorato_Azzariti_Antonella.pdf.
Full textAzzariti, Antonella <1978>. "I principi generali in materia di affidamento dei contratti pubblici." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2007. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/120/.
Full textSILVESTRI, MAURO. "POTERE PUBBLICO E AUTOTUTELA AMMINISTRATIVA." Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/61787.
Full textThe thesis focuses on the Italian system of so called autoprotection or selfprotection. This expression refers to the powers of public administration to revoke its own acts when deemed necessary to repair a vice of legitimacy or a vice of opportunity, without being bind to resort to the courts. Given the aim of this powers – the same of first grade powers plus a semi-judicial one – they are usually meant by judges and scholars as “widely discretionary”. Furthermore, it has always been believed that the choice to activate the correspondent proceeding is totally free for public administration; consequently, a demand of interested parties does not make binding the start of the procedure, opposite to what happens with administrative appeal proceedings. In recent years ECJ, ECHR and national case law has emboldened the limits to selfredress, making clear that legitimate expectations and the public interest to legal certainty must be taken into consideration and given sufficient protection. Lately, also the Legislator followed, making the annulment and the revocation harder to be put in effect when the first act is favorable to the addressed subject. In such cases, the revocation cannot be ordered for a mere reconsideration of already known circumstances (ius poenitendi) but only if new ones show up. At the same time, ex officio annulment is precluded after 18 months from the issuing of the first act, instead of the previous general limit of a “reasonable time”. On the other hand, the case law has apparently pointed out some hypothesis of mandatory annulment, such as for “anticomunitarian acts” and cost-producing acts. Based on these two orientation, some scholars suggested a global rethinking of the self-protection, its bases and its rules. The study analyzes the case law and the latest legislative reforms, proving that no mandatory annulment exists in the Italian legal system. Therefore, nor the ECJ principle of equivalence nor other principles require that selfredress become generally obliged. The thesis also aims to prove that selfprotection remains a discretionary power, in order to ensure that the contrasting needs (the rule of law on the one hand, and the legal certainty and legitimate expectation on the other hand) can be properly balanced in every decision, according to the Constitutional provision of article 97, which requires that both impartiality and good administration are pursued.
MARIOTTI, MARCO. ""Responsabilità colposa 'per fatto altrui"." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/630694.
Full textThis thesis provides a critical analysis of the circumstances in which an agent, who performs a negligent act, is held criminally liable for damage which was however not directly caused by his or her negligent act, but rather was caused by the act of another (with the view of causing damage either to another or to itself). This form of criminal liability “in relation to the conduct of another”, far from being exceptional, is common in many cases of failure to control or failure to prevent the commission of criminal offences by others, particularly in the context of team-working, and even more so within complex organisations having large corporate structures. The thesis examines the structural problems with this form of criminal liability. It identifies “relational elements”, the elements which enable the creation of a link between the responsibility of the agent whose conduct was the furthest to the damage, and the conduct of those having directly caused the damage. These relational elements impact both the basis on which liability attaches to the negligent agent, and the extent to which this liability exists. This analysis will cover both elements of a criminal offence, that is both the actus reus and the mens rea, with the aim of evaluating whether the legal framework at its current state effectively deals with “relational elements” as grounds for attaching liability, or whether too many uncertainties subsist when making this link– in both theoretical and practical terms– which prevent the clear and effective allocation of criminal liability among the different agents involved. First of all, with regards to the actus reus, this paper addresses the issue of concurring and intervening causes which may break the chain of causality between the agent’s action and the consequence of the actus reus, reaffirming the “sine qua non” paradigm. Furthermore, the research assesses the relevance in this context of the influence which one agent’s behaviour can have on the decisions subsequently taken by others, (known as a “psychological cause” of an action). The paper also critically analyses different theories regarding the basis of guarantees, whereby the guarantor’s liability only exists in relation to the act of another. On this point, a comparative analysis has highlighted how German case law has developed in such a way as to allow guarantees to arise from a factual basis, as opposed to solely through contract or other legally binding instruments, thus running the risk of violating the rule of law. Secondly, with regard to the mens rea element of an offence, the research examines three different examples of “relational elements”, by which another’s conduct needs to be taken into consideration, therefore entering into the mens rea element: (i) precautionary rules which can require the agent to observe another subject’s behaviour and to act accordingly; (ii) the expectation that other subjects involved will act lawfully, which needs to be accurately evaluated in order not to leave any gaps in the prevention of crime; (iii) the complex issue of foreseeability and avoidability of the consequences of one’s conduct, becomes even more intricate with the interposition of another’s conduct. Lastly, the paper will focus on joint enterprise in negligence cases. Having first of all stressed the structural uncertainties and the limited prosecutorial use of the concept of joint enterprise in the context of negligence offences, the thesis argues that through the different “relational elements” present in an offence, each agent’s liability can be independently determined by taking into account the interactions with others. It is worth noting that in the case where the mens rea element of an offence requires intentional participation to another’s negligent behaviour, these uncertainties appear to be even greater. In conclusion, the paper will point out that the liability of guarantors is independent from their participation in the joint criminal enterprise, as this type of liability arises from the guarantee itself.
CICCARE, MICHELE. "Il provvedimento abnorme nel processo civile." Doctoral thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11573/940094.
Full textBooks on the topic "Principio di affidamento"
Mantovani, Marco. Il principio di affidamento nella teoria del reato colposo. Milano: A. Giuffrè, 1997.
Find full textSpedale, Domenico L. L' affidamento bancario: Tecniche e principi di valutazione. 3rd ed. Milano, Italy: F. Angeli, 1986.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Principio di affidamento"
Massaro, Antonella. "Principio di affidamento e cooperazione colposa nell’attività medico-chirurgica." In Diritto penale e autoresponsabilità, 215–34. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748924074-215.
Full text