Academic literature on the topic 'Primary care (Medicine) Australian Capital Territory'

IntroductionThere are little published data on the long-term psychological outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors and their family members in Australian ICUs. In addition, there is scant literature evaluating the effects of psychological morbidity in intensive care survivors on their family members. The aims of this study are to describe and compare the long-term psychological outcomes of intubated and non-intubated ICU survivors and their family members in an Australian ICU setting.Methods and analysisThis will be a prospective observational cohort study across four ICUs in Australia. The study aims to recruit 150 (75 intubated and 75 non-intubated) adult ICU survivors and 150 family members of the survivors from 2015 to 2018. Long-term psychological outcomes and effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be evaluated at 3 and 12 months follow-up using validated and published screening tools. The primary objective is to compare the prevalence of affective symptoms in intubated and non-intubated survivors of intensive care and their families and its effects on HRQoL. The secondary objective is to explore dyadic relations of psychological outcomes in patients and their family members.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the relevant human research ethics committees (HREC) of Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Health (ETH.11.14.315), New South Wales (HREC/16/HNE/64), South Australia (HREC/15/RAH/346). The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal and presented to the local intensive care community and other stakeholders.Trial registration numberACTRN12615000880549; Pre-results.

ObjectiveTo provide deeper insight into why patients are admitted to hospital with gout and discover potential targets for better disease control.DesignData from semi-structured interviews were analysed using a thematic analysis approach.Participants and settingEleven inpatients from a tertiary institution in the Australian Capital Territory of Australia and their respective general practitioners (GPs) were invited to participate in the semi-structured interviews.ResultsDespite significant pain and disability that accompanied acute flares, patients continue to experience shame in seeking treatment and regarded gout as being not particularly important. Other barriers included patients’ poor continuity of care with and lack of confidence in GPs, suboptimal management in outpatient and inpatient settings, poor understanding of disease and treatment, and misconceptions held by both patients and physicians leading to uncontrolled disease activity.ConclusionsBarriers to optimal gout management including patient and health practitioner factors have produced a complex effect which has led to a cycle of treatment avoidance behaviours and recurrent hospitalisations for severe acute gout flares. These barriers could be addressed using a multipronged approach guided by the chronic care model which has been applied in a variety of other chronic diseases with improved patient and professional-level outcomes. Managing gout according to best practice for chronic disease is more likely to prevent recurrent hospitalisations and improve health outcomes in patients with gout.

IntroductionCardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and reducing the risk of repeat cardiac events. Physical activity is a core component of CR; however, studies show that participants remain largely sedentary. Sedentary behaviour is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality. Strategies to encourage sedentary behaviour change are needed. This study will explore the effectiveness and costs of a smartphone application (Vire) and an individualised online behaviour change program (ToDo-CR) in reducing sedentary behaviour, all-cause hospital admissions and emergency department visits over 12 months after commencing CR.Methods and analysisA multicentre, assessor-blind parallel randomised controlled trial will be conducted with 144 participants (18+ years). Participants will be recruited from three phase-II CR centres. They will be assessed on admission to CR and randomly assigned (1:1) to one of two groups: CR plus the ToDo-CR 6-month programme or usual care CR. Both groups will be re-assessed at 6 months and 12 months for the primary outcome of all-cause hospital admissions and presentations to the emergency department. Accelerometer-measured changes in sedentary behaviour and physical activity will also be assessed. Logistic regression models will be used for the primary outcome of hospital admissions and emergency department visits. Methods for repeated measures analysis will be used for all other outcomes. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted to evaluate the effects of the intervention on the rates of hospital admissions and emergency department visits within the 12 months post commencing CR.Ethics and disseminationThis study received ethical approval from the Australian Capital Territory Health (2019.ETH.00162), Calvary Public Hospital Bruce (20–2019) and the University of Canberra (HREC-2325) Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed academic journals. Results will be made available to participants on request.Trial registration numberACTRN12619001223123.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with unplanned 30-day readmissions following a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including association with post-hospital syndrome, patient enablement and transition from hospital to home.Design, setting and participantsA cross-sectional written survey of public and private patients attending a 6-week follow-up appointment after TKA at one of four clinical services in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) between 1 February 2018 and 31 January 2019. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to measure associations between patient, hospital and transitional care factors with unplanned 30-day readmissions, while controlling for known confounders.ResultsOf the 380 participants who completed the survey (n=380, 54% of TKAs undertaken over the study period), 3.4% (n=13; 95% CI: 1.8 to 5.8) were subsequently readmitted within 30 days of discharge after a primary hospitalisation. Public patients were significantly more likely to be readmitted within 30 days compared with private patients (adjusted OR=6.31, 95% CI: 1.59 to 25.14, p=0.009), and patients who attended rehabilitation were significantly less likely to be readmitted within 30 days of discharge than those who did not (adjusted OR=0.16, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.57, p=0.005). There were no associations between post-hospital syndrome or patient enablement and 30-day readmissions in this study.ConclusionReasons underlying the difference in unplanned readmission rates for public versus private patients need to be explored, including differences in surgical waiting times and the consequences for impairment and disease complexity. Strategies to foster increased participation post-surgical rehabilitation programmes need to be developed as an avenue to mitigate the burden of unplanned 30-day readmissions on individuals and health systems.

Context.— Since 2008, the Northern Territory Point-of-Care Testing Program has improved patient access to pathology testing for acute and chronic disease management for remote health services. Objective.— To evaluate the analytical quality, service delivery, and clinical utility of an expanding remote point-of-care testing network. Design.— Four years (2016–2019) of data on analytical quality, test numbers, and training statistics and 6 months of clinical point-of-care testing data from Abbott i-STATs at remote health services throughout the Northern Territory were analyzed to assess analytical performance, program growth, and clinical utility. Results.— From 2016 to 2019, point-of-care test numbers increased, with chemistry and blood gas testing more than doubling to 8500 and 6000 tests, respectively, troponin I testing almost doubling (to 6000), and international normalized ratio testing plateauing at 8000 tests. Participation in quality control and proficiency testing was high, with quality comparable to laboratory-based analytical goals. A shift toward flexible training and communication modes was noted. An audit of point-of-care test results demonstrated elevated creatinine, associated with chronic kidney disease management, as the most common clinically actionable patient result. Conclusions.— The Northern Territory Point-of-Care Testing Program provides high quality point-of-care testing within remote primary health services for acute and chronic patient management and care. Clinical need, sound analytical performance, flexibility in training provision, and effective support services have facilitated the sustainability of this expanding point-of-care testing model in the remote Northern Territory during the past 11 years.

The aim of this study is to describe average out-of-pocket costs across different regions of Australia, as defined by Primary Health Network (PHN) boundaries, and assess the association between population characteristics and out-of-pocket costs for selected primary care services. A combination of descriptive and regression analysis was undertaken using administrative data from the Australian Department of Human Services reporting on the health services used across PHNs in Australia. Those in regional areas paid significantly more for Allied Health services than those in capital cities (A$5.68, P=0.006). The proportion of an area’s population aged 65 years and over was inversely related to out-of-pocket charges for Allied Mental Health (–A$79.12, P=0.029). Some areas had both high charges and disadvantaged populations: Country South Australia, Northern Queensland, Country Western Australia, Tasmania and Northern Territory, or populations with poor health: Northern Territory and Tasmania. Although there was a large amount of variation in out-of-pocket charges for primary care services between PHNs in Australia, there was little evidence of inequality based on health, age and socioeconomic characteristics of a population or the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Objective: For at least two decades, concerns have been raised about inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in Australian residential aged care facilities, due to their modest therapeutic benefit and increased risk of falls and mortality. To date, the majority of prevalence data has been collected in Sydney exclusively and it is not known if recent initiatives to promote appropriate psychotropic prescribing have impacted utilisation. Thus, we aimed to comprehensively analyse psychotropic use in a large national sample of residential aged care facility residents. Method: A cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study of residents from 150 residential aged care facilities distributed nationally during April 2014–October 2015. Antipsychotic, anxiolytic/hypnotic and antidepressant utilisation was assessed, along with anticonvulsant and anti-dementia drug use. Negative binomial regression analysis was used to examine variation in psychotropic use. Results: Full psychotropic prescribing data was available from 11,368 residents. Nearly two-thirds (61%) were taking psychotropic agents regularly, with over 41% prescribed antidepressants, 22% antipsychotics and 22% of residents taking benzodiazepines. Over 30% and 11% were charted for ‘prn’ (as required) benzodiazepines and antipsychotics, respectively. More than 16% of the residents were taking sedating antidepressants, predominantly mirtazapine. South Australian residents were more likely to be taking benzodiazepines ( p < 0.05) and residents from New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory less likely to be taking them ( p < 0.01), after adjustment for rurality and size of residential aged care facility. Residents located in New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory were also significantly less likely to take antidepressants ( p < 0.01), as were residents from outer regional residential aged care facilities ( p < 0.01). Antipsychotic use was not associated with State, rurality or residential aged care facility size. Conclusion: Regular antipsychotic use appears to have decreased in residential aged care facilities but benzodiazepine prevalence is higher, particularly in South Australian residential aged care facilities. Sedating antidepressant and ‘prn’ psychotropic prescribing is widespread. Effective interventions to reduce the continued reliance on psychotropic management, in conjunction with active promotion of non-pharmacological strategies, are urgently required.

The increased demand for Out of School Hours Care (OSHC) has been linked to changes that have occurred in the family structure and work habits. OSHC programs operating on school sites under the management of a committee of parents and school representatives provide parents with one option to meet the needs for care of primary age children. This study examined the issue of OSHC from the perspectives of workers involved in the provision of services in government school sites in the ACT. Data were gathered by way of semi-structured interviews with nineteen coordinators from sixteen After School Care (ASC) centres. The data were analysed to find similarities in the experiences of workers interviewed. Extracts from the interviews are presented in the findings to illustrate the perceptions care givers have about their work and areas where changes can be made to improve the quality of ASC services. The study provides information on the factors affecting the provision of quality services and suggests possible directions for future planning and research in this area. The findings indicate that the care givers interviewed perceived their role as a positive influence in the lives of children and families. Care givers sought to provide relaxed environments for children after the school day. Many centres operated with the strong support of parents, schools and management committees. The findings suggest that ASC centres can and do operate successfully on school sites in the ACT and that care givers were generally happy with the level of service provided. However, variability in the facilities and support provided to centres was noted. The study concludes that real improvement to the quality of programs and support of workers is dependent on the introduction of nationally recognised standards in the provision of ASC.

BACKGROUND: In response to demographic changes, increasing rates of chronic disease and demand for primary health care services, since the early 2000’s Australia has increased the number and roles of general practice nurses (GPNs). There is a scarcity of evidence establishing whether the increased availability and use of nursing care in general practice has resulted in improved patient outcomes. Two key quality outcomes – patient satisfaction and enablement – have been examined extensively as outcomes of general practitioner care; however an evidence gap exists regarding these outcomes in relation to GPN care. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between general practice and GPN consultation characteristics, and patient satisfaction and enablement. METHODS: A concurrent mixed methods study was conducted. The quantitative component consisted of a cross-sectional study of 678 patients (response rate = 41%) receiving GPN care in 21 general practices in the Australian Capital Territory. Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Surveys were distributed to these patients between September 2013 and March 2014. Multilevel mixed effect models were used to analyse these data. The qualitative component took a grounded theory approach to in-depth interviews with GPNs (n=16), patients (n=23) and practice managers (n=9) from these same general practices. Data generation and analysis were conducted concurrently using constant comparative analysis and theoretical sampling. After the separate quantitative and qualitative analyses, findings were integrated. This involved quantification of selected qualitative variables for inclusion in multilevel analyses and a secondary integration of findings. FINDINGS: The results of this study provided evidence of: ● a significant association between patient satisfaction and Nursing scope of practice and autonomy, Continuity of GPN care, Patients making appointments to see a particular GPN, Consultation type and Duration of consultation; ● a significant association between patient enablement and Nursing scope of practice and autonomy, Consultation type and Duration of consultation;● behaviours that characterise ‘the just right nurse’; ● an interconnection between patient satisfaction and enablement. This evidence is presented in the form of a theoretical model called, developing a positive patient experience with nurses in general practice: an integrated model of patient satisfaction and enablement. This process-based model includes general practice and GPN consultation characteristics underpinning actions and interactions that support the triggering of health care partnerships between patients and GPNs, and tailoring care to meet each patient’s unique needs. The effectiveness of this model is contingent on the general practice context in which it operates. Examination of characteristics that support broad scopes of nursing practice coupled with high levels of autonomy facilitated an understanding of ‘enabling’ and ‘less-enabling’ general practices. CONCLUSION: This integrated model of patient satisfaction and enablement is a practical tool to inform education and training for GPNs and other clinicians, particularly in relation to the management of patients with chronic and long-term conditions. This evidence provides impetus to deepen our insight into general practice models of care that facilitate enhanced nursing scope of practice and autonomy, continuity of care and adequate time for nursing consultations. Integral to patient-centred care, these interprofessional models are the key to optimising GPN roles and the associated quality patient outcomes.