To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Prey-predator relationships.

Books on the topic 'Prey-predator relationships'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 15 books for your research on the topic 'Prey-predator relationships.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Taylor, Iain R. Barn owls: Predator-prey relationships and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Barn owls: Predator-prey relationships and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Taylor, Iain. Barn Owls: Predator-Prey Relationships and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Helms, Doris R. Predator-Prey Relationships: Separate from Biology in the Laboratory 3e. W. H. Freeman, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

E, Feder Martin, and Lauder George V, eds. Predator-prey relationships: Perspectives and approaches from the study of lower vertebrates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

(Editor), George V. Lauder, ed. Predator-Prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches from the Study of Lower Vertebrates. Univ of Chicago Pr (Tx), 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Uhlig, Leslie J. Comparison of predator-prey relationships between stoneflies and mayflies in various habitats of Padden Creek. 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Komiya, Teruyuki. Hantā: Kari o suru seibutsutachi. 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kasperbauer, T. J. Evolved Attitudes to Animals. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190695811.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter looks at how our attitudes to animals have been shaped by different roles animals played in our evolutionary history. It reviews research on attitudes toward animals across cultures and among very young children. The main argument of the chapter is that we primarily inherited antagonistic attitudes toward animals from our evolutionary forebears. Antagonistic and aversive reactions to animals are discussed within the context of predator–prey relationships and disease avoidance. Positive attitudes to animals are also accounted for by looking at the evolution of pet-keeping and caring for animals. Attitudes toward animals among groups of indigenous people are considered in order to test the validity of the evolutionary account presented in the chapter.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

King, Carolyn M., Grant Norbury, and Andrew J. Veale. Small mustelids in New Zealand: invasion ecology in a different world. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198759805.003.0010.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter reviews the ecology of the three species of small mustelids introduced into New Zealand: the ferret (Mustela furo), the stoat (M. erminea) and the weasel (M. nivalis), for biological control of rabbits. New Zealand offers a mosaic of environments totally different from those in which the three species evolved, including a diminishing array of endemic fauna especially vulnerable to mammalian predators. Mustelids in New Zealand display significant adaptive flexibility in diet, habitat selection, co-existence, dispersal, body size, population biology and predatory impact, with results contrasting with those observable in their northern-hemisphere ancestors. These evolutionary and ecological responses by mustelids to new opportunities are of considerable interest to evolutionary ecologists, especially those interested in competition and predator-prey relationships. Likewise, the need to protect New Zealand’s native fauna has stimulated extensive research on alternative options for mitigating the effects of invasive predators, applicable to pest management problems in other countries.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Cahir, Fred, Ian Clark, and Philip Clarke. Aboriginal Biocultural Knowledge in South-eastern Australia. CSIRO Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/9781486306121.

Full text
Abstract:
Indigenous Australians have long understood sustainable hunting and harvesting, seasonal changes in flora and fauna, predator–prey relationships and imbalances, and seasonal fire management. Yet the extent of their knowledge and expertise has been largely unknown and underappreciated by non-Aboriginal colonists, especially in the south-east of Australia where Aboriginal culture was severely fractured. Aboriginal Biocultural Knowledge in South-eastern Australia is the first book to examine historical records from early colonists who interacted with south-eastern Australian Aboriginal communities and documented their understanding of the environment, natural resources such as water and plant and animal foods, medicine and other aspects of their material world. This book provides a compelling case for the importance of understanding Indigenous knowledge, to inform discussions around climate change, biodiversity, resource management, health and education. It will be a valuable reference for natural resource management agencies, academics in Indigenous studies and anyone interested in Aboriginal culture and knowledge.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Ruxton, Graeme D., William L. Allen, Thomas N. Sherratt, and Michael P. Speed. The evolution and maintenance of Müllerian mimicry. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199688678.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
Müllerian mimicry arises when unpalatable or otherwise unprofitable species evolve a similar appearance. While Batesian mimicry is widely considered to have evolved in palatable prey as a consequence of selection to deceive predators into believing that they are unpalatable, Müllerian mimicry is believed to have arisen as a consequence of selection to spread the burden of predator education through the adoption of a shared warning signal. Müllerian mimics are therefore considered mutualists, collectively reinforcing the protective value of their shared warning signals. We begin by discussing some examples of Müllerian mimicry that cannot be explained simply on the basis of shared ancestry. We then discuss Müller’s explanation in more depth, before presenting evidence that the shared resemblance has arisen for the reason that Müller hypothesized. Finally, we consider some of the predicted and observed properties of Müllerian mimicry systems in detail, including ecological and co-evolutionary phenomena, and consider some common questions that have only been partly resolved. We end by considering the connection between Batesian and Müllerian mimicry, arguing that like many natural systems, the nature of relationships can readily fluctuate from being parasitic to mutualistic and vice versa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Krebs, J. R. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Science Inc, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

R, Krebs J., and Davies N. B. 1952-, eds. Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. 3rd ed. Oxford [England]: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Ruxton, Graeme D., William L. Allen, Thomas N. Sherratt, and Michael P. Speed. Disruptive camouflage. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199688678.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
Disruptive camouflage involves using coloration to hinder detection or recognition of an object’s outline, or other conspicuous features of its body. This involves using coloration to create ‘false’ edges that make the ‘true’ interior and exterior edges used by visual predators to find and recognize prey less apparent. Disruptive camouflage can therefore be thought of as a manipulation of the signal-to-noise ratio that depends on features of the perceptual processing of receivers. This chapter discusses the multiple mechanisms via which disruptive camouflage is thought to influence visual processing, from edge detection, through perceptual grouping, and then on to object recognition processing. This receiver-centred approach—rather than a prey-phenotype-centred approach—aims to integrate disruption within the sensory ecology of predator–prey interactions. We then discuss the taxonomic, ecological, and behavioural correlates of disruptive camouflage strategies, work on the relationship between disruption and other forms of protective coloration, and review the development of approaches to quantifying disruption in animals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography