Academic literature on the topic 'Predictive Personality Measure'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Predictive Personality Measure.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Predictive Personality Measure"
Borghans, Lex, Bart H. H. Golsteyn, James J. Heckman, and John Eric Humphries. "What grades and achievement tests measure." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 47 (November 8, 2016): 13354–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601135113.
Full textPoorthuis, Astrid M. G., Sander Thomaes, Jaap J. A. Denissen, Marcel A. G. van Aken, and Bram Orobio de Castro. "Personality in Action." European Journal of Psychological Assessment 30, no. 3 (January 1, 2014): 169–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000186.
Full textFleischhauer, Monika, Anja Strobel, Sören Enge, and Alexander Strobel. "Assessing Implicit Cognitive Motivation: Developing and Testing An Implicit Association Test to Measure Need for Cognition." European Journal of Personality 27, no. 1 (January 2013): 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1841.
Full textMervielde, Ivan. "Cognitive processes and computerized personality assessment." European Journal of Personality 2, no. 2 (June 1988): 97–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020205.
Full textSchmalbach, Bjarne, Markus Zenger, Ana Nanette Tibubos, Ada Borkenhagen, Bernhard Strauss, and Elmar Brähler. "The Narcissistic Personality Inventory 8: Validation of a Brief Measure of Narcissistic Personality." International Journal of Psychological Research 13, no. 2 (August 19, 2020): 68–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4855.
Full textMcGrath, Robert E., Ashley Hall-Simmonds, and Lewis R. Goldberg. "Are Measures of Character and Personality Distinct? Evidence From Observed-Score and True-Score Analyses." Assessment 27, no. 1 (October 26, 2017): 117–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191117738047.
Full textMcbride, Carolina, David C. Zuroff, Jason Bacchiochi, and R. Michael Bagby. "DEPRESSIVE EXPERIENCES QUESTIONNAIRE: DOES IT MEASURE MALADAPTIVE AND ADAPTIVE FORMS OF DEPENDENCY?" Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 34, no. 1 (January 1, 2006): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.1.1.
Full textSpielmann, Nathalie, Barry J. Babin, and Caroline Verghote. "A personality-based measure of the wine consumption experience for millennial consumers." International Journal of Wine Business Research 28, no. 3 (August 15, 2016): 228–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-09-2015-0035.
Full textHelou, Leah B., J. Richard Jennings, Clark A. Rosen, Wei Wang, and Katherine Verdolini Abbott. "Intrinsic Laryngeal Muscle Response to a Public Speech Preparation Stressor: Personality and Autonomic Predictors." Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63, no. 9 (September 15, 2020): 2940–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00402.
Full textDolan, Mairead. "Psychopathic personality in young people." Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 10, no. 6 (November 2004): 466–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/apt.10.6.466.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Predictive Personality Measure"
Bryant, P. C. II. "Predictive validity and test-retest reliability of a measure of resilience." Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/28883.
Full textGatt, Justine Megan. "The Personality-Disease Link: An Evaluation of a Predictive Personality Measure, the Mediating Mechanisms of the Personality-Disease Link and a Preventative Intervention." University of Sydney, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/915.
Full textGrossarth-Maticek and Eysenck (1988) demonstrated that personality type as measured by the 70-item Grossarth-Maticek Personality Stress Inventory (GMPSI), predicts mortality and its cause with remarkable accuracy. Further, various forms of autonomy training, such as bibliotherapy and short individual treatment that were designed to reduce the toxic personality features (such as emotional dependence) effectively improved long-term health outcomes. However, several aspects of their theory and research were either insufficiently explicated or require further investigation. For example, the researchers did not thoroughly investigate the psychometric properties of the inventory, and they did not sufficiently examine the mechanisms that may mediate the personality-health relationship. Further, the autonomy training was inadequately described, and perhaps could have been briefer and had the same impact. Three studies were run to investigate these issues further. Study 1 (Chapter 2) investigated the internal consistency, test-retest reliability and convergent, discriminant and concurrent validity of the GMPSI in 312 first-year students, using a variety of statistical techniques (e.g., structural equation modeling, confirmatory factor analysis, and simple correlations). In addition, the psychometric properties of this scale were compared to those of three revised versions of the scale, which were theorised to be psychometric improvements of the original version from basic principles. The revised versions contained reverse-worded items (of different types) to monitor and disrupt acquiescence response sets, and/or an extended response scale to improve internal consistency and stability. Psychometric effects of reverse-wording and the extended response scale on scale reliability were examined via the analysis of construct reliability estimates, personality subscale model fit of congeneric measurement models (a form of structural equation modeling), and test-retest reliability estimates. The original version of the scale appeared to be the most reliable and valid scale of the four versions. This improved reliability of the original version was not an artifact of an acquiescence response set, because this form of responding was not prevalent in the reverse-worded versions. In contrast, it appeared that the incorporation of reverse-wording degraded the internal consistency of the scale as participants appeared to respond to the positive and negative-worded items as if they were measurements of independent constructs, rather than measurements of constructs on opposite ends of a particular dimension. Predicted correlations between the GMPSI and concurrent validity measures offered support for Grossarth-Maticek's theory, and suggest that the GMPSI is an effective and reliable tool for the measurement of these personality types. However, experimental evidence supporting the link between personality, mediating mechanisms and disease is required to further substantiate these findings. The second and third studies (Chapters 3 and 4, respectively) were investigations of the utility of an information pamphlet discussing stress, assertiveness and relaxation, in improving GMPSI personality type stress responses in a student and a community sample (Studies 2 and 3 respectively), and provided an opportunity to investigate the mechanisms mediating the personality-health relationship via experimental manipulation. Specifically, Study 2 investigated the effectiveness of the pamphlet in improving personality scores, mood, coping strategies, health behaviours, and salivary cortisol levels (measured at pre-treatment, 1-month post-treatment and 5-months post-treatment) in 200 first-year university students. Further, two modes of administration of the pamphlet were compared: pure selfadministration versus instruction accompanied by self-administration. Group differences in mood and cortisol reactivity to a visualisation stress task were also assessed. Very few significant differences were found between the two pamphlet administration forms. Both pamphlet forms were effective in improving mood states, some lifestyle habits (e.g., exercise), and salivary cortisol responses to the acute stress task compared to the control group. The strength of these effects ranged from small to medium, and all significant differences were between pre-treatment and the 1-month post-treatment session. The failure to observe differences at the 5-months post-treatment session may have been due to inadequacies of the treatment, or low statistical power for detecting effects from the final session due to the large attrition rate that had occurred by this session. Overall, while large treatment effect sizes were not found, the results could be construed as "clinically" significant when taking into account the low costs of implementing an information pamphlet in the larger community, and the potential benefits on individuals' stress responses and health behaviours. Study 3 aimed to investigate the treatment effects of the same self-administered pamphlet in 77 participants from the general community, who varied largely in age (19 - 77 years). Treatment and control groups were compared in terms of treatment compliance, cortisol levels, health behaviours, personality scores, perceived stress, mood, and coping styles (measured at pre-treatment, 2 weeks posttreatment, 3 months post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment). In addition, group differences in cortisol reactivity to an acute cognitive stress task were examined. Home visits were arranged for each session to reduce sample attrition. Further, an intervention evaluation form was administered at each post-treatment session to verify and maintain treatment involvement. Several significant treatment effects were observed, including changes in personality scores and non-productive coping strategies, and the strength of these effects ranged from medium to very large. Most participants reported that they found the information pamphlet very appealing and helpful. In addition to the examination of intervention effects in the second and third studies, a path model that aimed to identify direct and mediating relationships between personality and concurrently measured disease was examined for the two samples (Chapter 5). This path model was based on a new integrative theory of personality-disease, which was developed. Eysenck's (1991) proposed personality-disease model formed the foundation of this new theory, and elements of several other generic personality-disease models were also incorporated. This theory was empirically tested using path analysis on the student and community data separately. Common pathways in the two models were then tested for invariance. Overall, most paths proposed by the integrative model were identified in one or both samples; thus, the model was generally supported. All common direct paths were statistically invariant (i.e., equivalent) in the two samples. While personality did not appear to directly predict illness, several significant indirect pathways were identified by which personality appears to affect disease incidence, such as via perceived stress, mood, coping styles, and physical risk factors. These findings appear to support Grossarth-Maticek's theory that personality affects disease incidence via stress responses, as well as other generic approaches (i.e., the personality-induced hyperreactivity model and the stress moderator model) that emphasise the stress-moderating effects of personality on health. However, support for the dangerous behaviours model was not found, which posits that certain personality dispositions seek risky behaviours (e.g., poor health behaviours such as smoking and alcohol consumption) that fit their personality. The final Chapter 6 directly compares the results of these three studies, and discusses their practical and theoretical significance in terms of Grossarth-Maticek's theory and research, views of critics, and other personality-health perspectives and research. In summary, the current studies appear to suggest that the GMPSI is a reliable and valid scale for the measurement of particular personality traits. Further, there appears to be evidence to suggest that personality traits can be changed by an intervention pamphlet. This information pamphlet also appears to be effective in significantly improving responses to stress, and these effects are more prominent in high-risk groups (i.e., subjects with extreme personality trait scores). Moreover, there is some evidence to suggest that personality may have direct effects on several mechanisms involved in the development of disease. Overall, this thesis demonstrates the importance of recognising the role of personality and stress in disease prevention and prediction by providing independent evidence for the benefits of treatment and mechanisms by which benefits may occur.
SHAW, TYLER HARRISON. "Predicting Vigilance Performance, Stress, and Coping with Individual Difference Measures." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1212003114.
Full textWiita, Nathan Ellis. "Voluntary turnover prediction comparing the utility of implicit and explicit personality measures /." Thesis, Atlanta, Ga. : Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/31786.
Full textCommittee Chair: Lawrence R. James; Committee Member: Jack Feldman; Committee Member: Richard Catrambone. Part of the SMARTech Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Collection.
Sood, Deepti. "Predicting Shoulder Fatigue for Long Durations Using Psychophysical Measures Obtained from Short Trials." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33219.
Full textWhile researchers have studied specific task conditions in controlled environments, the specific relationship between various risk factors and underlying injury mechanisms is largely unknown. Two main problems faced by researchers are limited resources and the large scope of potential ergonomic analyses. This study attempted to circumvent some of these limitations by examining the time-course of fatigue and the predictive potential of subjective measures. The feasibility of using shorter experimental durations to make deductions for a 2-hour work period was explored. Reductions in experimental duration means decreased experimental time, expenses and resources. Thus, in turn, the researcher can utilize available resources to study more factors and a more general scenario. Specifically, subjective measures of shoulder fatigue were used to determine the possibility of reducing experimental duration for an intermittent overhead task.
A laboratory-simulated intermittent overhead task was designed based on observations made at an automotive assembly unit. For this study, two treatment conditions were tested consisting of different combinations of two tool masses and two duty cycles. The choice of the treatment conditions was made to simulate different task difficulty levels of occupational tasks and their effects on shoulder fatigue. Each experiment was conducted for 2 hours (a common duration in industries with job rotation) for these selected treatment conditions. Subjective measures of fatigue were collected to assess shoulder fatigue and relative acceptability of the overhead work.
Any observed trends in the subjective fatigue measure were determined and tested using statistical and mathematical models to determine how best to represent their salient characteristics. Derived qualitative and quantitative measures were also used to estimate the maximal acceptable task durations using certain formalized assessment techniques. Results of this research suggest possible reductions in the experimental duration. Short (8 to 26 minute) trials were found to be sufficient to predict performance measures for 2 hours. Results also indicated a strong influence of task difficulty level on the predictive performance of subjective measures though personality type did not show very consistent trends. Various unique analysis techniques used to look at the psychophysical data may prove useful for further investigation into predictive verification. A generalized mathematical model, a type of approach, was also developed to represent changes in the psychophysical measures over time. This research can find both industrial and research applications where resources are constrained and using psychophysical measures is feasible. In the following report, details on this work are presented, including a description of the factors that inspired this study, an outline of the relevant literature, methodology, results and their implications.
Master of Science
Black, Melissa S. "The efficacy of personality and interest measures as a supplement to cognitive measures in the prediction of military training performance." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ40348.pdf.
Full textO'Keefe, Damian F. W. "The usefulness of personality measures in predicting performance across and within Canadian Forces job families." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/tape15/PQDD_0005/MQ33850.pdf.
Full textFoster, Thomas F. Pashneh-Tala Kamyar. "The utility of personality measures in the admissions process at the United States Naval Academy /." Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2002. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion-image/02Jun%5FFoster%5FPashneh-Tala.pdf.
Full textLaPaglia, Jonathon G. "Testing Multiple Sociometer Theory: Predicting Physical and Psychological Abuse in Dating Couples from Domain-Specific Self-Esteem Measures." W&M ScholarWorks, 2008. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539626574.
Full textWimsatt, Michael Charles. "Faking and Response Distortion by Applicants: A Comparison of Corrective Techniques and the Validity of Personality Measures." VCU Scholars Compass, 2004. http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd_retro/81.
Full textBooks on the topic "Predictive Personality Measure"
Campbell, Mary Ann. Assessing the utility of risk assessment tools and personality measures in the prediction of violent recidivism for adult offenders. [Ottawa]: Public Safety Canada, 2007.
Find full textGardner, Paula J. Predictive and concurrent validity of personality dimensions derived from object relations theory as measured by the Rorschach. 1993.
Find full textGardner, Paula J. Predictive and concurrent validity of personality dimensions derived from object relations theory as measured by the Rorschach. 1993.
Find full textJackson, Joshua J., and Brent W. Roberts. Conscientiousness. Edited by Thomas A. Widiger. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.18.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Predictive Personality Measure"
Dentale, Francesco, Michele Vecchione, and Claudio Barbaranelli. "Applying the IAT to Assess Big Five Personality Traits." In Advances in Psychology, Mental Health, and Behavioral Studies, 1–15. IGI Global, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6599-6.ch001.
Full textRastogi, Rohit, Devendra Kumar Chaturvedi, and Mayank Gupta. "Computational Approach for Personality Detection on Attributes." In Handbook of Research on Advancements of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Engineering, 287–317. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2120-5.ch016.
Full textJoyce-Beaulieu, Diana, and Carmelo M. Callueng. "Children and Adolescents." In The ITC International Handbook of Testing and Assessment, 276–89. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199356942.003.0019.
Full textContreras-Masse, Roberto, Juan Carlos Bonilla, Jose M. Mejia, and Alberto Ochoa. "A Comparison of Personality Prediction Classifiers for Personnel Selection in Organizations Based on Industry 4.0." In Handbook of Research on Natural Language Processing and Smart Service Systems, 266–88. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4730-4.ch012.
Full textDhavale, Sunita Vikrant. "Motivational Quotes-Based Intelligent Insider Threat Prediction Model." In Advances in Digital Crime, Forensics, and Cyber Terrorism, 164–76. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4900-1.ch010.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Predictive Personality Measure"
Urbane, Biruta, Irina Plotka, Nina Blumenau, and Dmitry Igonin. "Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Bases of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Towards Domestic and Foreign Food Brands." In 14th International Scientific Conference "Rural Environment. Education. Personality. (REEP)". Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Faculty of Engineering. Institute of Education and Home Economics, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/reep.2021.14.024.
Full text