Journal articles on the topic 'Political discourse'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Political discourse.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Political discourse.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
ALMOHADAWI, MOHAMMED AKIF, and HISHAM ALI HUSSAIN ALI. "POLITICAL DISCOURSE." Al-Adab Journal 3, no. 142 (September 15, 2022): 59–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.31973/aj.v3i142.3822.
Full textAbstract:
The problem of political discourse appeared as a reaction to the need for generalization, or as an attempt to find common points in the vast variety of political research. This task was set by Foucault when he wrote "The Archaeology of Knowledge", for disciplines "whose boundaries are very blurred, and the content is extremely vague - in the history of ideas, science, thought or knowledge".
Political discourse, apart from the obvious at first glance, the positive results for the study of political phenomena - the possibility of mutual use of different methodological approaches to maximize research of related Sciences (psychology, sociology, linguistics), providing the possibility of determining the object of study, it also raised a lot of issues to be addressed: in particular, the problem of deducing from-under charges of excessive bias in linguistic research, issues, media, politic, problems of structure and form.
2
McQuade, Joseph. "POLITICAL DISCOURSE, POLITICAL VIOLENCE." Sikh Formations 10, no. 1 (January 2, 2014): 43–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17448727.2014.890799.
Full text
3
Kuriata, Yuliia, and Olena Kasatkina-Kubyshkina. "STYLISTIC DEVICES IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE." Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ» 1, no. 13(81) (May 26, 2022): 27–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2022-13(81)-27-30.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers stylistic means in political discourse on the examples of modern and past Ukrainian and foreign politicians’ speeches. The topicality of the research is defined by social significance of political discourse in the life of the community. The term “political discourse” is determined as coherent oral or written text, expressed through both verbal and nonverbal means, which directly depends on the situation of political communication in combination with pragmatic, socio-cultural, psychological and other factors. A “figure of speech” (also called “stylistic device” or “rhetorical device”) is commented on as a modification of the usual or expected sequence of words, grammatical structure of the text, the use of any of a variety of techniques to produce an auxiliary meaning, idea, or feeling. The definitions and examples of “metaphors” (especially those related to war, sports, family, and nature), “personification”, “repetition”, “simile”, “allusion”, “synechdoche”, “hyperbole”, “emotive language”, “balance”, “inverted phrases”, “rhetorical figures” (rhetorical appeals, questions, assumptions, exclamations, statements), “gradation”, “ invective” and “poetic devices” (irony as one of the ways of comic perception of reality, which contains a hidden mockery of facts or people; satire as sharp, sensitive ridicule of vices, errors, negative phenomena of reality, a sharp, scathing mockery; sarcasm as malicious, scathing mockery, caustic irony; humour as benevolent laughter, aimed at exposing certain defects of human character or inconsistencies in people’s lives, in their behaviour; word game as a means of artistic expression that functions in language as a joke, created on the basis of polysemy, homonymy and similar sounding words) are given in the context of political discourse. “Sustained (prolonged) metaphor” is enlarged on with relation to the problem researched. Factors influencing the choice of political discourse strategies and tactics are commented on, namely – a personality of a politician and their function in the political system and the addressee of communication.
4
Bull, Peter. "The Microanalysis of Political Discourse." Philologia Hispalensis 1, no. 16 (2012): 79–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/ph.2012.v26.i01.04.
Full text
5
Tribunskaya, N. A., and V. D. Shevchenko. "Discursive structures in political communication." Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology 27, no. 3 (November 26, 2021): 118–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-3-118-127.
Full textAbstract:
This article is devoted to the study of discursive structures in political sphere, represented in the English-language source Twitter of the President of the United States. The purpose of the study is to analyze the discursive structures that arise as a result of the interaction of political discourse with other types of discourses. To achieve it, the authors set the following tasks: identifying specific markers in the political discourse that characterize the presence of other discourses, analyzing the features of the communicative situation of message transmission, identifying the features of interdiscursiveness and polydiscursivity. The material for the analysis was the statements of Donald Trump on Twitter from November 1, 2019 to November 1, 2020. The authors of the article use various methods: descriptive, contextual analysis, comparative, methods of observation, content analysis and discourse analysis. The study uses the linguistic concept of the American scientist D. Himes S-P-E-A-K-I-N-G, which includes an analysis of the components of the situation: Participants, Ends, Act Sequence etc. Using the situation model in the messages, participants, their actions and other characteristics were highlighted. President is the author of the messages, while the addressee is a collective one. The same participants, depending on the context of the message, become participants of other types of discourses. The article examines such types of discourses as economic, educational, medical, which are part of political discourse. Their choice is due to the socio-economic significance of the issues of economics, education and health care in the life of society. In addition, the media function of political communication is reflected. The texts are posted on the Internet platform, due to which the political discourse is drawn into the space of the Internet discourse. The analysis made it possible to identify the features of large-scale interdiscursiveness and to highlight the levels of discursive heterogeneity.
6
Karachun, Yuliia G., and Nataliia V. Davydenko. "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE: THEORY OF IDEOLOGICAL ASPECT." Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2, no. 26/2 (December 26, 2023): 139–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.32342/2523-4463-2023-2-26/2-9.
Full textAbstract:
The article aims to highlight the ideological aspect of functioning politically correct vocabulary in today’s political discourse. Realization of the set goal requires solving the following objectives: 1) to expand scholarly ideas about the interpretation of the linguistic phenomenon of political correctness as sociocultural and linguistic-behavioral ideology in political discourse; 2) based on the introduction of the concept “ideologeme”, to consider the classification of politically correct lexical units, used in political discourse. The study employs general scientific methods (analysis, generalization, systematization of scholarly literature on the issue under consideration), and special linguistic methods (method of distributional analysis, used to highlight the main semantic groups of politically correct vocabulary; elements of the component analysis, necessary to identify components of the meaning of politically correct vocabulary; method of linguostylistic analysis, used to study the functional features of politically correct vocabulary based on ideology). The study emphesizes that the phenomenon of political correctness can be considered as a set of linguistic and discursive components of the organization of the ideological life of modern society. It is able to ensure the creation of a system of values, the worldview, and in general, it involves the construction of reality. It also contributes to the dissemination and imposition of an opinion on one or another issue in society, mostly within the framework of political discourse. Political correctness deals with a situation in society where implicit rules of decency direct the ways of behavior in interactions between people of different races, genders, religions, and other potentially charged groups. It seems that political correctness in political discourse concerns all those areas where the interests of different groups of society collide on the issue of what is considered true or false, and who is considered “friend” or “stranger”. Political correctness as an ideology offers a polar view on social life, highlighting in it “good” (“right”) and “evil” (“bad”). Consequently, at the most abstract level, there are concepts that define the basic values of political correctness, as well as their “antipodes,” i.e., undesirable, unacceptable phenomena and attitudes that must be eradicated from social life (e.g., tolerant / intolerant, inclusive / exclusive). In general, it can be presented as a “good – evil” model of social life, which works and effectively serves the ideology of political correctness. Admittedly, the structure of the language of political correctness is not as homogeneous as it is commonly believed. Two broad layers of politically correct lexis that perform qualitatively different roles are considered: politically correct vocabulary, which includes the “acceptable” names of sociocultural phenomena, and politically correct ideologemes that are used to directly form a politically correct worldview. Ideologemes, as a result of the interaction of language and ideology, represent the optimal means for establishing the dominant worldview in the country, influence the transformation of the addressee’s already existing political worldview, explicitly or implicitly represent the basic ideological and value attitudes of a society. If politically correct vocabulary itself is an example of the “acceptable” language concerning different matters of life, then the ideologemes of political correctness set standards for assessing heterogeneous sociocultural phenomena. In turn, the attitudes and principles embedded in the ideologemes are implemented in the creation of politically correct vocabulary. Thus, ideologemes form the core of the linguistic representation of the ideology of political correctness. Their most common word-formation models involve exploiting the suffix -ism, the -free and -phobia components, the words “bias” and “sensitivity”. It can be argued that the ideologeme is a characteristic element of the global political context, since it is a kind of reference to a particular era, its meaning is detached from the direct meanings of the lexical units that make it up. An adequate understanding of the ideologeme is possible only in the context of the corresponding ideology and the context of a certain period of history.
7
PRYMA, Viktoriia. "STRATEGIZING DISCOURSE: BUSINESS ENGLISH IN POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTS." Проблеми гуманітарних наук Серія Філологія, no. 56 (December 21, 2023): 59–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.24919/2522-4565.2023.56.7.
Full textAbstract:
Summary. In the third millennium, English-speaking linguistics is a key science, because it allows you to prolong life and improve its quality. The choice of the research topic is relevant, since modern linguistics is actively developing discursive research, and the problem of English-language political discourse is one of the most important in the world. The purpose of the research presented in this article is to analyze the genre differentiation of English-language political discourse. In modern linguistics, there is a wide range of approaches to understanding the term "discourse". English political discourse is one of the varieties of institutional discourses, which are characterized by certain normative frameworks and specific communicative goals. From a linguistic and sociocultural perspective, political and media discourses are in close interaction. This phenomenon is the subject of more and moreresearch, but is still considered mainly as an interaction of two separate discourses, each of which has its own characteristics. The object of this research is the study of political narrative as linguistic and cultural phenomenon It is a complex discourse that combines political discourse and media discourse. In the future, we will use the term “English-speaking” for marking both the British and American versions of this narrative. We come to the conclusion that the English language is political discourse is a complex system of communication that performs three main functions: informative, evaluative and imperative. Variety of political genres discourse allows politicians to fully inform the public about their activities, shape public opinion and influence decision-making. English-language political discourse is the subject of many academic studies discipline, as it is an important tool of political power and influence on society.
8
Theodoropoulou, Irene. "Social class struggle as a Greek political discourse." Discourse & Society 30, no. 1 (September 28, 2018): 85–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801080.
Full textAbstract:
This article delves into the construction of social class division in Greek political discourse. More specifically, the focus is on ‘ταξική πάλη’ (class struggle) as a discourse that has started being carved in Greek media since the current leftist government party, Syriza, won the election in 2015 for the first time in the country’s political history. Contrary to Syriza, which always frames its arguments on the basis of a divisive class fight discourse between the elitists and laypeople, New Democracy, the liberal and main oppositional party, tries to play down this discourse by advocating a more unifying and social class inclusive discourse. The analysis suggests that social class struggle is a theme framed within a wider shifting (anti)populist discourse constantly being negotiated linguistically in ironic ways among political elites. Both the government and opposition parties engage in tactical maneuvering of competing political discourses that, in different ways, articulate attachments to the ‘people’. The theoretical contribution of this study is the discursive theorization of social class struggle as a digitally constructed and politically relevant discourse in the context of Greek populism and its discontents.
9
Moheddin, Kurdistan Rafiq, and Dr Kawa Abdulkareem Sherwani. "Hedges used in Kurdish Political Discourse." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 23, no. 3 (September 20, 2019): 648–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v23i3/pr190354.
Full text
10
J. Nayef, Karim. "Political Discourse in Iraq after 2003." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24, no. 03 (February 18, 2020): 1192–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i3/pr200870.
Full text
11
Çanakpınar, Betül, Murat Kalelioğlu, and Veli Doğan Günay. "Political discourse and semiotics." Chinese Semiotic Studies 20, no. 2 (May 1, 2024): 255–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2024-2014.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In recent years, semiotics has put “life” at the center of the subject of study. There is the desire to be successful in the lifestyle and the desire to convey the right knowledge to the recipient or the correct use of practices in life. A semiotic theory developed by Jacques Fontanille recently showed that strategy can also be used in semiotic analysis. So, the way of life that Fontanille talks about is not just strategy. The process we call “lifestyle” has an order from small to large: There are basic signs, texts, objects, actants, practices, action phases, strategies, and finally lifestyle. In this study, we question the function of strategy, but generally of productive pursuit, in the analysis of political discourses. In our study, we reveal the approach of semiotics to political discourses that concern the whole world and discuss whether they are valid in every society. We emphasize political semiotics, which is used to understand the general structure of political discourses, and show the general functioning of political discourses with Greimas’ Actantial Model. We conclude that politicians can influence target audiences by using various methods and discourse strategies.
12
Moshe, Mira. "Dissonant political discourse." Journal of Language and Politics 9, no. 2 (July 15, 2010): 175–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.2.01mos.
Full textAbstract:
This study develops and illustrates the notion of dissonant political discourse. The discourse of dissonance is to be found wherever there is public debate on controversial topics or on topics requiring a decision, notably in the political arena. Discourse of this kind is characterized by arguments demonstrating both how hard and how necessary it is to face up to any decision that will put the decision maker in an inconsistent position. Findings confirm that voices heard in the arena of political discourse make use of dissonant argument when experiencing difficulties in justifying decisions. Ironically, it is precisely the evidence of difficulties encountered by the speakers that shows how continuation of the joint debate is ensured
13
Alvarez-Cáccamo, Celso, and Gabriela Prego-Vázquez. "Political cross-discourse." Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 13, no. 1 (March 1, 2003): 145–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.1.07alv.
Full textAbstract:
Through the analysis of political rallies and parliamentary speech in Galiza, it is shown how conversationalized forms of political discourse enter into ideological manipulation and hegemony-building by professional politicians. The overall resulting phenomenon, cross-discourse, draws from habitual, daily and traditional forms of speech. Political cross-discourse consists of the tactical texturing of traditional political oratory templates through select informal conversational forms and themes. Three main forms of cross-discourse found in the data are exemplified. Cross-discourse indexes and constructs social spaces and networks at several levels of generality: From those of daily interactions to an imaginary supranetwork of common citizens. This form of cross-discursive circulation (from daily speech to politics) gives the illusion of fluidity between social fields in formal democracies, while it hides the very unequal nature of the distribution of discursive resources.
14
Al-Daghistani, Sami. "Governing Political Islam." Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 21 (October 26, 2021): 95–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/jais.9160.
Full textAbstract:
This paper analyzes what I define as an anti-Islamist discourse (or an “Islamistphobia”) both as a social reality and as conceptual innovation in contemporary Egypt. The paper focuses on four interrelated actors—the current Egyptian regime and its discourse on political Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood and its historical entanglements with the Egyptian state, the Salafi al-Nūr and Rāya Parties, and al-Azhar’s relation with both the regime and the Islamists. I advance an idea that anti-Islamist sentiments channel primarily through official (state) and media discourses in Egypt, rooted in both a colonialist locale and in a contemporary religious framework and its anticolonial rhetoric. It is, however, directed primarily against the Muslim Brotherhood, rather than against all Islamist groups across the board.
Keywords: Anti-Islamist discourse, Islamistphobia, Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt, political Islam
15
Orungbeja, Babatunde, and Kolade Ajilore. "National Speeches on Notable Political Figures." European Scientific Journal, ESJ 19, no. 17 (June 30, 2023): 128. http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n17p128.
Full textAbstract:
This study highlighted the value and appropriateness of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in the examination of national speeches of political leaders for policy pronouncements. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interplay among power, ideology, and language and the mechanisms deployed in the national discourses of some notable political leaders to capture reality, manipulate, persuade and shape the audience (citizenry) to action. This study underscored the capability of Critical discourse analysis (CDA) to investigate the manner by which social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political contexts. The study revealed attempts at ideology legitimization and power dominance through the use of cognitive discourses. We are taken through the empowerment ability of discourse in diverse socio-political contexts and how power relies on discourse for multidisciplinary actions that convince the citizenry to acknowledge, sustain and advocate their leaders’ ideologies. The study adopted a conceptual framework and relied on secondary and tertiary sources. The study also made recommendations to scholars on how to adopt discourse-related methodologies to enhance knowledge creation in political addresses. Lastly, the study acknowledged the limitations of the CDA approach.
16
Tsutsieva, Mariia G. "COMMUNICATIVE-SPEECH REALIZATION OF THE CATEGORY OF POLITENESS IN MODERN GERMAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE." German Philology at the St Petersburg State University 13 (2023): 346–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2023.119.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of the communicative-speech implementation of the category of politeness in modern German political discourse, associated with the manifestation of such professional and personal qualities of its main subjects — politician, as political correctness, persuasiveness, etc. The analysis is carried out on the material of the texts of modern German political discourse. The methodological basis of the analysis is scientific works on the theory of discourse and text, political linguistics, pragmalinguistics, sociolinguistics, cultural linguistics. The understanding of the category of politeness as an interdisciplinary dynamic phenomenon is accepted. The complex bipolar system of the category of politeness, which is based on a dynamic scale of communicative strategies and linguistic means of expressing both formally polite and emotionally expressive address, is updated in various types of discourses. When analyzing the features of the expression of the category of politeness in modern German political discourse, the syncretism of its functions, primarily ethical and persuasive, is taken into account. The interaction and mutual influence of the main functions of the category of politeness are shown on the example of the implementation of the communicative strategy of dialogization by the linguistic personality of a German politician in various situations of political discourse. The article substantiates the thesis that by creating a quasi-reality of dialogue, using speech politeness formulas, a politician has an impact on the audience to achieve political goals.
17
Kopik, Monika. "Comparative analysis of American and Russian political discourse: A discourse analysis study." Linguistics Beyond and Within (LingBaW) 9 (December 30, 2023): 49–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.31743/lingbaw.17015.
Full textAbstract:
This article provides an exhaustive analysis of American and Russian political discourse through the examination of the linguistic techniques employed by President Joe Biden and President Putin in their speeches. The aim of this research is to examine the linguistic approaches employed in referencing social and political traditions in the United States and Russia, investigate disparities in linguistic strategies within both political discourses, and assess variations in semantic outcomes. The analysis has been conducted to answer the following research questions: (1) What are the linguistic methods of referring to social and political traditions in America and Russia? (2) Do the linguistic strategies differ depending on the political discourse? (3) Is the semantic output different depending on the political discourse? The findings reveal marked differences between the two discourses, reflecting the social and political discrepancies between the political systems of the United States and Russia.
18
Vestergaard, Torben. "Political discourse and the discourse of politicians." International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10, no. 1 (June 2000): 3–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2000.tb00136.x.
Full text
19
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman. "Political discourse as mediated and public discourse." Journal of Pragmatics 38, no. 2 (February 2006): 143–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.014.
Full text
20
Sirkiia, N. Р. "POLITICAL DISCOURSE vs POLITICAL INTERNET DISCOURSE: SIMILARITIES AND DISTINCTIONS (COGNITIVE ASPECT)." Historical and social-educational ideas 10, no. 2/2 (June 9, 2018): 164–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2018-10-2/2-164-170.
Full text
21
Guan, Shaoyang. "POLITICAL CARTOON OR MULTIMODAL POLITICAL DISCOURSE." Политическая лингвистика, no. 6 (2018): 140–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.26170/pl18-06-20.
Full text
22
Furkó, Péter, and Ágnes Abuczki. "English discourse markers in mediatised political interviews." Brno Studies in English 40, no. 1 (2014): 45–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/bse2014-1-3.
Full text
23
Mykhaylenko, Valery. "DELTA OF PERSONAL PRONOUNS IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE." Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ» 1, no. 6(74) (June 27, 2019): 82–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2019-6(74)-82-85.
Full text
24
Kuswandoro, Wawan. "PENETRASI TANPA LABEL: PENDEKATAN BARU INTERNALISASI IDEOLOGI PANCASILA PADA GENERASI MILENIAL." WASKITA Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter 7, no. 1 (April 30, 2023): 17–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.waskita.2023.007.01.2.
Full textAbstract:
This article describes millennial Pancasila discourse. Discourse on Pancasila is often combined with discourse on The New Order, ideology politicization, partisan ideology, practical political objectives, and other political discourses. The Pancasila animates citizenship discourse on life, ideology, and state. The discourse on Pancasila has a discursive dynamic that suggests discussion, from power parties using it for political propaganda to its alienation in social life, especially among the millennial age. The article uses Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method to analyze big data from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram hashtags for #Pancasila and #Millennial, scientific discourse in journals, and informants. MediaToolKit was used to mine besides informants from Java, Kalimantan, Sumatra, Bali, Nusa Tenggara, and Papua provided discourses and narratives. This research explores the Pancasila discourse among the millennial age and a novel technique of ideological penetration called "penetration without a label (Pental)" to internalize Pancasila philosophy.
25
Ali, Rayyan Hussien, and Jinan Mohammed Watheq. "The Role of Certain Figures of Emphasis in the Televised Debate between Macron and Le Pen on may 3, 2017». Le rôle de certaines figures d’insistance utilisées dans le débat télévisé entre Macron et Le Pen le 3 mai 2017." Journal of the College of languages, no. 45 (January 2, 2022): 161–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2022.0.45.0161.
Full textAbstract:
Political Discourse Analysis is an important linguistic study approach used by politicians to gain people support. The present paper sheds light on the figures of speech of emphasis in the televised debate between the two presidential elections candidates, Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen and the distinctive effect they add to the political discourse to win general public support as well as the presidential elections. The present paper provides a rudimentary definition and an analysis of the terms “discourse” and “political discourse” and traces the significant role played by politically directed televised Media and internet to support political parties through broadcasting political events. Through conducting an analytical study, the paper considers the discourse analysis concept that aims at deconstructing the speech modules to attain the required speech purpose. Part of the present study theoretical approach, the paper terms and clarifies all types of Figures of speech used by politicians to create a publically stronger luminous witty and emotional impact. As for the paper practical approach, it sheds light on the stressing effect of four types figure of emphasis in French and the impact created on the political discourse. Thus, it can be remarked that both candidates particularly Macron has made use of the figures of speech in his political discourse, specifically after winning the presidential elections. Pun or paronomasia, repetition and accumulation in comparison with redundancy are impressively used in Macron’s political discourse to win public support. Résumé L’analyse du discours politique a un écho large dans les études linguistiques. Les politiciens essayaient d’utiliser le langage pour attirer l’attention de leur public à leurs décisions. Dans cette recherche, nous parlons du rôle des figures d’insistance entre les deux candidats aux élections présidentielles, Emmanuel Macron et Marine Le Pen. Notre mission est de découvrir l’impact de ces figures dont les candidats ont profité afin de gagner les élections. Ces figures donnent au texte une expression particulière dans le but de convaincre les gens. De plus, nous définissons en générale le terme «discours» en expliquant l’analyse du discours politique, puis nous montrons l’effet des médias sur la politique en transmettant les événements selon l’intérêt du politicien qui les soutient. Ensuite, nous abordons le concept d'analyse du discours et son objectif de déconstruire les éléments essentiels du discours en menant une étude analytique. Sa tâche principale est de séparer les facteurs qui forment la parole afin d'atteindre le but du discours. En ce qui concerne le cadre théorique, nous étudions quatre types de figures d’insistance et leur effet de renforcer le texte qui se base en premier lieu sur le style et la capacité d’utiliser les méthodes rhétoriques. Enfin, nous trouvons que les deux candidats profitent des figures d’insistance et surtout Macron après avoir remporté les élections. Nous constatons que l’anaphore, la répétition et l’accumulation sont plus utilisés que la redondance.
26
Arakelyan, Anna. "Metaphor in Political Discourse." Armenian Folia Anglistika 5, no. 1-2 (6) (October 15, 2009): 72–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.46991/afa/2009.5.1-2.072.
Full textAbstract:
The article highlights the importance of metaphor in political discourse as a means of expression that makes the language more impressive. Making the political discourse more expressive, target-oriented and powerful, metaphor gives the audience a chance to perceive the delicate and hidden meanings of the political thought. It has not only an emotional and impressive impact, but logical and realistic nuances, as well.
27
Stankevych, O. I. "Bilingualism in Political Discourse." Англістика та американістика, Вип. 13 (2016): 59–63.
Find full text
28
Van Dijk, Teun A. "Political discourse and ideology." Doxa Comunicación. Revista interdisciplinar de estudios de comunicación y ciencias sociales, no. 1 (December 2003): 207–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n1a12.
Full textAbstract:
This paper analyses the influence of ideologies on political discourse, in terms not only of content but also of form and interaction, defining ideology in the broadest sense of basic beliefs shared by members of a group and understanding political discourse to be a class of genres defined by a social domain, namely that of politics. The ways in which ideologically based beliefs are exhibited in discourse and discursive evidence in the interplay of several ideologies are analysed in the form of a debate on asylum seekers in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary debates are particularly revealing for these purposes because their text and content exhibit the social cognitions of political parties and their members. An analysis of this particular debate shows how political discourse in general, and parliamentary debates in particular, are replete with ideological expressions and rhetorical tropes at all levels.
29
Grange, Joseph, and Fred Dallmayr. "Margins of Political Discourse." Philosophy East and West 41, no. 4 (October 1991): 590. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1399658.
Full text
30
Tucker, Kenneth H., and Fred Dallmayr. "Margins of Political Discourse." Contemporary Sociology 19, no. 5 (September 1990): 760. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2072397.
Full text
31
Zhukova, Yu V., and A. R. Motinova. "ARGUMENTATION IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE." Main problems of modern linguistics 12, no. 12 (2020): 140–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.21672/2075-535x-2020.02.29-140-142.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes the process of argumentation in political discourse, details the functions of argument, and gives examples in political speech. Particular importance is attached to explaining the kinds of reasoning in political discourse.
32
Volkova, Y. A., and N. N. Panchenko. "Destructiveness in Political Discourse." Russian Journal of Linguistics 20, no. 4 (2016): 160–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2016-20-4-160-178.
Full text
33
Bánhegyi, Mátyás. "Translation and Political Discourse." Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 6, no. 2 (March 1, 2015): 139–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2015-0011.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe paper describes the text linguistic research of political texts in the field of Translation Studies and presents an overview of critical discourse analysis-based studies. First, the relationship between text, power and ideology and its implications on the role of translation are explored. This is followed by a review of a number of studies on the translation of political texts and on the power relations involved. The paper classifies such studies into the following six categories representing distinct research fields: translators' professional roles and politics; translators acting as mediators in situations of political conflict; translators' professional responsibilities and the strategies they apply; the inference of translators' own historical, social and cultural backgrounds; manipulation in the translation of literary texts and other text types; and critical discourse awareness in Translation Studies. The most recent studies in the above research fields and their results are also presented. It is concluded that these approaches exhibit quite varied research methods and their results are almost impossible to compare. With a view to the future development of this research field, it seems expedient to introduce a unified research theory, method and tool.
34
Romagnuolo, Anna. "Political discourse in translation." Discourse Analysis and Translation Studies 4, no. 1 (June 5, 2009): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tis.4.1.01rom.
Full textAbstract:
Political discourse has been the subject of increasing interest in recent decades with the development of ideological and rhetorical criticism focusing on US presidential speeches, especially after the events of 9/11. Indeed, extensive research literature already exists in the field of American presidential rhetoric. The same cannot be said for studies of political texts available in translation. Currently, translation studies seems to be more concerned with the politics and the politicization of translation than with the translation of political texts, which have been examined more from a synchronic perspective than a diachronic one. Using a diachronic parallel corpora of Italian translations (published in books and newspapers) of a specific genre of US presidential speech, the inaugural address, this study highlights recurring translation strategies as well as problems, related to culture-bound and value-laden political terms, style, and phraseology. This research also seeks to contribute to the definition of political language as a language for specific purposes.
35
Filardo-Llamas, Laura. "RE-CONTEXTUALIZING POLITICAL DISCOURSE." Critical Discourse Studies 12, no. 3 (March 23, 2015): 279–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013478.
Full text
36
Jones, Ben. "Authenticity in Political Discourse." Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19, no. 2 (October 15, 2015): 489–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9649-6.
Full text
37
De, Eduard. "Reflection and Political Discourse." Journal of Foreign Studies ll, no. 24 (June 2013): 199–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.15755/jfs.2013..24.199.
Full text
38
Dikovic, Jovana. "Metaphors in political discourse." Glasnik Etnografskog instituta 58, no. 1 (2010): 141–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/gei1001141d.
Full text
39
Cavazza, Nicoletta, and Margherita Guidetti. "Swearing in Political Discourse." Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33, no. 5 (May 2014): 537–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927x14533198.
Full text
40
WEIWEI, ZHANG. "China's New Political Discourse." New Perspectives Quarterly 29, no. 4 (October 2012): 19–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2012.01340.x.
Full text
41
Pasternak, T. A. "METAPHORICITY IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE." Тrаnscarpathian Philological Studies 1, no. 28 (2023): 140–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2023.28.1.26.
Full text
42
Anber, Maha Majeed. "Metaphor in Political Discourse." Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 30, no. 12, 2 (December 30, 2023): 336–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.30.12.2.2023.28.
Full textAbstract:
This study aims to reveal the role of metaphors in political discourse, and the impact of metaphors on political discourse. To achieve the aims of the study, the following topics have been reviewed and analyzed: the notion of understanding how metaphors shape political discourse, analyzing the impact of metaphors on political decision-making, examining the cultural and historical context of political metaphors, identifying potential biases in political discourse, types of metaphors in discourse, politicians use of metaphors in political discourse, and reviewing previous studies conducted on metaphors in political discourse. The findings revealed that in political and presidential discourse, metaphors play a significant role in shaping public perception and opinion. Metaphors have the power to frame issues and shape narratives, influencing how people interpret and respond to political messages. Political leaders often use metaphors to communicate complex ideas and evoke emotional responses from their audiences. In addition, there are three important purposes for using metaphors in political contexts: (1) To simplify complex ideas. (2) To create emotional impact. (3) To enhance persuasive power.
43
Tang, Xuefei. "Political discourse in the knowledge economy: edutainment as a genre." European Conference on Social Media 9, no. 1 (April 28, 2022): 247–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/ecsm.9.1.106.
Full textAbstract:
In the socio-political context of a strategic transformation of public diplomacy in China, non-governmental discourses such as intellectual discourses have been showing increasing visibility both online and offline, at home and abroad. Through a digital ethnographic approach, this study investigates the meaning-making of the political discourse that uses edutainment as a genre by foregrounding the media activities of a commercial media company branded by Guan Media and the media discourse of an involved intellectual. Social media are changing the normality of knowledge production and distribution and the traditional media communication logic. Whether it is market-based filter bubble and echo chamber, politically controlled censorship, or spontaneous grassroots engagement, what is important is why and how mainstream discourses are constructed because of these factors through social media as a new form of political communication. To show the complexity of media communication of political messages in China, micro-level close observation on highly visible forms of news production and distribution by non-government actors is necessary. There are two levels of analysis in this study: self-branding of researchers in the knowledge economy, and edutainment as a genre of political discourse. Multimodal discourse analysis is adopted to discover the specific discursive and media strategies through the theoretical lenses of knowledge-power structure and semiotics. The cooperation of commercial media companies and intellectuals from higher education is found to be promoting a new form of political communication, in which edutainment works as a genre for better media presentation. In the context of the knowledge economy, edutainment content adjusts to the ideological dynamics of the socio-political reality in China in the tide of globalization and digitalization. This study contributes to understanding the participation of non-governmental actors in political communication and public sentiment on politics when political communication has become more dynamic and better organized by adjusting to the new media age.
44
Pavlichenko, Larysa V. "POLARIZATION IN MEDIA POLITICAL DISCOURSE ON THE WAR IN UKRAINE: CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS." Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2, no. 24 (December 20, 2022): 214–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.32342/2523-4463-2022-2-24-18.
Full textAbstract:
The war unleashed by Russia in 2022 is widely presented in online versions of English-language newspapers; Ukraine is constantly in the epicentre of the world news. This study highlights political and ideological contexts of the war in Ukraine, the sociopolitical and cognitive aspects of news according to an interdisciplinary approach considering the language as a social practice. The article highlights the polarization in the presentation of the events and the main actors entitled in the discursive strategies, representing the dichotomy In- versus Out-group. The study is aimed at the investigation of the ideological structures and their manifesting linguistic devices in political discourse based on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of discursive strategies for constructing the images of Ukraine and Russia in the British and American press. The integrated Critical Discourse Analysis was applied to the research of the news to study the media discourse and the language, where CDA focuses on social practice, social power and ideology. Political Discourse Analysis (PDA) is used to research the ideology of war images presented in the language of news reports. The relevance of this study determined by the aim is to show the main discursive strategies of polaeization in political media discourse. The research methods of the article combine three vectors of the analysis by Fairclough with explanatory tools (by van Dijk), and the elements of stylistic analysis and Critical Metaphor Analysis. The illustrative material was collected by information search and continuous sample from the open access newspapers and magazines issued in the US and Great Britain (The Daily Mail, The Financial Times, The Guardian, The Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and others). Conclusion. This research argues that polarisation is being demonstrated in the media discourse on the war in Ukraine in 2022. The taxonomy of the identified discursive strategies of polarization deployed in the media political discourse includes labelling, evidentiality, number game, hyperbolism, victimization, personalization and analogy, that can either be used singly or intervened. The discursive strategy of evidentiality is applied to authorities, officials, witnesses that are accepted as trustworthy sources of data; the number game strategy combined with victimization are verbalized by metaphoric simile, metonymy, enumerating and magnifying the numbers with the modifying adverbs; the strategy of hyperbole conveys the positive impression of the in-group and negative acts magnification of the out-group verbalized by metaphor, metonymy, metaphtonymy; the personalization strategy is deployed with the purpose of foregrounding the positive actions of the in-group that implies negative out-group actions; the strategy of analogy is applied in the comparison of the war in Ukraine and the struggle of the Ukrainians for their independence with other historical events. Linguistic means used to realize the discursive strategies of polarization include the conceptual metaphor, metonymy, simile, idioms, metaphtonymy, intertextual allusion and personification.
45
Kondratenko, Nataliia. "Humor in Ukrainian political discourse." Culture of the Word, no. 91 (2019): 112–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.37919/0201-419x-2019.91.10.
Full textAbstract:
The research focuses on the problem of humor in Ukrainian political discourse, which is interpreted as a manifestation of human activity. The peculiarities of the combination of political and game discourses in Ukrainian political communication were clarified, which resulted in the active use of humorous components in the speeches of politicians. Linguistic means of expression of humor in posts on social networks and speeches of Ukrainian politicians are analyzed. The purpose of our study is to investigate linguistic means of humor representation as the main manifestation of comic relief in Ukrainian political discourse. The purpose was to solve the following tasks: to outline the concept of political discourse in terms of the game concept of communicative activity; to analyze political genres in the speech of Ukrainian politicians; identify the linguistic features of political trolling; to find out the specifics of humor in the Ukrainian political discourse. The material of the research was the statements, speeches and posts in the social networks of famous Ukrainian politicians (L. Kravchuk, P. Poroshenko, V. Zelensky, Yu. Tymoshenko, U. Suprun etc.). Political humor is a communicative strategy in communicating politicians with one another and with ordinary citizens, and is a form of protection and distance from political problems. The appearance of a comic effect in communicative interaction depends on the intensity of the speaker and the extralinguistic factors. The main expressions of political humor are jokes, jokes and trolling. Trolling is featured in social media posts and aimed at ridiculing political opponents. The specificity of the Ukrainian political humor in the linguopragmatic aspect is provocative, irony and personal addressing of speech.
46
Matkevičienė, Renata. "Politinio žiniasklaidos diskurso apibrėžtys: žiniasklaidos, kaip politinės komunikacijos dėmens, tyrimas Renata Matkevičienė." Informacijos mokslai 44 (January 1, 2008): 107–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/im.2008.0.3402.
Full textAbstract:
Žiniasklaidos dalyvavimas šiandieniame politiniame gyvenime akivaizdus ir nekvestionuojamas. Pastaraisiais metais ji tapo bene aktyviausia politinės komunikacijos veikėja, taip pat aktyviai politikos srities dalyvių panaudojama terpe siekiant tikslų. Šio straipsnio tikslas – apibrėžti ir nusakyti politinio žiniasklaidos diskurso teorinio tyrimo dėmenis. Išsikėlus tikslą, siekiama nustatyti politinio žiniasklaidos diskurso apibrėžties ir tyrimo apibrėžtumą, ištirti žiniasklaidos, kaip politinio proceso veikėjos, vaidmenis ir tyrimo galimybes. Šiame straipsnyje teigiama, kad politiniame žiniasklaidos diskurse atsiskleidžia dvejopas žiniasklaidos, kaip politinės komunikacijos elemento, vaidmuo: pirmiausia politinio žiniasklaidos diskurso analizė nurodo žiniasklaidą kaip vietą (erdvę), kurioje vyksta sąveika tarp politikos veikėjų, visuomenės ir žiniasklaidos institucijų; antra, žiniasklaida gali būti tiriama kaip institucija, formuojanti politinį diskursą, arba priemonė, taikoma jam formuoti.Determination of political mass media discourse: investigation of mass media as an element for political communicationRenata Matkevičienė SummaryParticipation of the mass media in nowadays political life is very actually and not questioned process. In recent years mass media became one of the most active participants in political communication, and as well it became an instrument for other participants of political sphere to influence electorate, and other audiences. The aim of the article is to define and to determine elements of theoretical investigation of political mass media discourse. The idea of the article is to find out frames from determination and theoretical investigation of mass mediated political discourse, to research mass media as the active participant of political processes, to clear up its roles and possibilities for research.In this article there is made a supposition that in political mass mediated discourse there could be seen double role of the mass media as the element of political communication. From one side political mass mediated discourse analysis presents mass media as the sphere (place) where the interaction between poli tical actors, society and mass media institutions take place. On the other hand mass media could be used as an institution that sets political discourse or as an instrument that could be used to form it. Hedonistic and consumer society puts its impact on political mass mediated discourse. Contemporary mass mediated political discourse presents not discussions on political items and ideologies, but outputs of packaged politics (for example, political actors are presented not as participants of political sphere, but as show stars, with highlighted their human characteristics. As a conclusion there could be stated that investigation of political mass mediated discourse is possible in only one way – when there are investigated all discourses that influence political mass mediated discourse, such as: political discourse, mass media discourse, public discourse. Interrelations between those discourses could not be affected by one discourse and that could be seen especially during political election campaign.
47
Fridlund, Patrik. "Post-truth Politics, Performatives and the Force." Jus Cogens 2, no. 3 (November 2020): 215–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00029-8.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This paper on post-truth politics argues that to the extent that one wants to understand political discourses generally (post-truth political discourses in particular), it is crucial to see them as circulating talk that performs rather than reports. This implies a shift in focus. Many react strongly to ‘post-truth’ assertions by appealing to evidence, objectivity, facts and truth. In this paper, it is suggested that, when analysing political discourses, there is no point asking, ‘Is it true?’ One should rather ask, ‘What happens as a result?’ Understanding political discourses as performative demands that the resulting doing, transforming and changing may transcend established parameters and known patterns. That also means problematising the types of argument allowed, or discourse considered appropriate, in a given situation. What, then, is the force within the performative discourse driving transformation? What role does intention play? And who—if anybody—can be designated as the master of the discourse? One way of answering these questions is to broaden the perspective of what happens in verbal exchanges. The hearer-speaker relation is fundamental, one in which meaning is shaped and the performative force is formed. A political discourse in general, and a post-truth political discourse in particular, cannot do and perform—cannot function—in a vacuum. This evokes serious questions about accountability and responsibility and also about human action and freedom.
48
JATMIKO, MOCHAMAD IQBAL. "POST-TRUTH, MEDIA SOSIAL, DAN MISINFORMASI: PERGOLAKAN WACANA POLITIK PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN INDONESIA TAHUN 2019." Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh 20, no. 1 (July 1, 2019): 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v20i1.9529.
Full textAbstract:
Today, positivistic in the political sphere has been invaded by the notion of relativism. The post-truth regime bursts into political discourse and public awareness. Community opinion is driven in distrust of objective data. Reality manipulation is increasingly being carried out for political purposes. In this condition, the community is more secure with pseudo-facts that match personal beliefs. The discourse of political lies is then packaged into alternative discourses to match objective facts. The development of massive information technology, through online media, helps the distribution of discourse in the community. Public awareness through opinion is built and new facts are created. This is how Indonesian political contestation in 2019 is full of strange discourses without data. Political recitals are chaotic because of the disparity among factions that spread lies, hatred, and nonsense. Community elements are exploited for the sake of discourse battle victory. Like passive objects that are annihilated, people are made slaves to win the political elite.
49
Al-Momani, Hassan Ali. "Political Discourse of Jordan: A Critical Discourse Analysis." International Journal of English Linguistics 7, no. 2 (January 20, 2017): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n2p90.
Full textAbstract:
Based on the critical discourse analysis theory, the main purpose of this study is to highlight the social and psychological dimensions of the political discourse of Jordan through analyzing king Abdullah’s address to the American Congress in 2007 from socio-cognitive, socio-ideological, and socio-stylistic perspectives. Additionally, the paper uses the critical discourse analysis theory to examine selected quotations from the king’s address in order to see how the Jordanian political discourse is influenced by the status, ideologies, and attitudes of the congressmen to whom it is directed.
50
Hissen, Nina, Declan Conway, and Marisa C. Goulden. "Evolving Discourses on Water Resource Management and Climate Change in the Equatorial Nile Basin." Journal of Environment & Development 26, no. 2 (March 12, 2017): 186–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496517696149.
Full textAbstract:
Transboundary water resources management in the Equatorial Nile Basin (EQNB) is a politically contested issue. There is a growing body of literature examining water-related discourses which identifies the ability of powerful actors and institutions to influence policy. Concern about the effects of future climate change has featured strongly in research on the Nile River for several decades. It is therefore timely to consider whether and how these concerns are reflected in regional policy documents and policy discourse. This study analyzes discourse framings of water resources management and climate change in policy documents (27, published between 2001 and 2013) and as elicited in interviews (38) with water managers in the EQNB. Three main discursive framings are identified which are present in the discourses on both subjects: a problem-oriented environmental risk frame and two solution-oriented frames, on governance and infrastructure development. Climate change discourse only emerges as a common topic around 2007. The framings found in the water resources management discourse and the climate change discourse are almost identical, suggesting that discursive framings were adopted from the former for use in the latter. We infer that the climate change discourse may have offered a less politically sensitive route to circumvent political sensitivities around water allocation and distribution between riparian countries in the EQNB. However, the climate change discourse does not offer a lasting solution to the more fundamental political dispute over water allocation. Moreover, in cases where the climate change discourse is subsumed within a water resources management discourse, there are dangers that it will not fully address the needs of effective adaptation.