To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Policy evaluation.

Journal articles on the topic 'Policy evaluation'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Policy evaluation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Varone, Frédéric, Steve Jacob, and Lieven De Winter. "Polity, Politics and Policy Evaluation in Belgium." Evaluation 11, no. 3 (July 2005): 253–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389005058475.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Trochim, William M. K. "Evaluation policy and evaluation practice." New Directions for Evaluation 2009, no. 123 (June 2009): 13–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ev.303.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kocherlakota, Narayana R. "Practical policy evaluation." Journal of Monetary Economics 102 (April 2019): 29–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.01.009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bohm, Peter, and Hans Lind. "Policy evaluation quality." Regional Science and Urban Economics 23, no. 1 (March 1993): 51–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)90028-d.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lafond, Colette, Traci L. Toomey, Catherine Rothstein, Willard Manning, and Alexander C. Wagenaar. "Policy Evaluation Research." Evaluation Review 24, no. 1 (February 2000): 92–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841x0002400104.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Stewart, John. "Urban policy evaluation." Cities 13, no. 5 (October 1996): 367–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(96)84797-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Schmidt, Christoph M. "Policy evaluation and economic policy advice." AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis 91, no. 4 (October 12, 2007): 379–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10182-007-0040-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Česnakas, Giedrius, and Gerda Jakštaitė. "Lithuania’s foreign policy in the public policy cycle: efficient evaluation is still missing." Public Policy And Administration 18, no. 1 (April 9, 2019): 22–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.18.1.23125.

Full text
Abstract:
The Activity Report of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania for 2017 declares that Lithuania’s foreign policy is effective and claims that public opinion is the most important criteria for measuring its effectiveness. The article analyses Lithuania’s foreign public policy cycle, with the focus on its formation and evaluation peculiarities. It argues that the cycle of Lithuanian foreign public policy is stagnating since its evaluation stage lacks efficiency and misses critical evaluations. The lack of strategic documents does not allow defining core foreign policy goals and in this matter to evaluate their achievement. The ambiguous goals in lower level documents prevent critical evaluation because of political interests. Lithuanian foreign policy is the outcome of close cooperation between President’s Office and Ministry of Foreign Affairs which limits criticism between institutions. The Seimas provides greater criticism only when initiative is showed by the opposition. Foreign policy remains the sphere of responsibility of the political elite which has broad consensus and has differences in their views on a tactical level. Media and experts, for the most part, avoid critical evaluations of foreign policy as they want to remain in the dominating discourse and keep close contacts with state institutions. The current evaluation environment and tools are not sufficient to make changes at the agenda-setting stage of foreign policy. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.18.1.23125
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Andersen, Lars Højsgaard. "The future of Nordic criminal policy evaluation." Kriminologia 2, no. 1 (November 29, 2022): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.54332/krim.124936.

Full text
Abstract:
Nordic criminal policy evaluation has unique features, such as ones related to policy context, policy content, and the availability of excellent register data. This paper briefly lays out these features and argues that the future of Nordic criminal policy evaluation could well lie in exploiting these features even more. It is argued that we should aim to tie criminal policy evaluation to social policy evaluation more broadly. And that we should aim to use policy evaluations to study margins of behavior rather than “just” measure average effects of reforms or policies. These aims will be hard to reach unless we think of and search for even better data than we already have.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Pattyn, Valérie, Bart De Peuter, and Marleen Brans. "Why do Ministers Ask for Policy Evaluation Studies? The Case of the Flemish Government." Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60, no. 4 (December 2019): 701–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00211-8.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractPolicy evaluations can be set up for multiple purposes including accountability, policy learning and policy planning. The question is, however, how these purposes square with politics itself. To date, there is little knowledge on how government ministers present the rationale of evaluations. This article is the first to provide a diachronic study of discourse about evaluation purposes and encompass a wide range of policy fields. We present an analysis of evaluation announcements in so-called ministerial policy notes issued between 1999 and 2019 by the Flemish government in Belgium. The research fine-tunes available evidence on catalysts for conducting evaluations. The Flemish public sector turns out to be a strong case where New Public Management brought policy evaluation onto the agenda, but this has not resulted in a prominent focus on accountability-oriented evaluations. We further show that policy fields display different evaluation cultures, albeit more in terms of the volume of evaluation demand than in terms of preferences for particular evaluation purposes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Porter, Jamila M., Laura K. Brennan, Mighty Fine, and Ina I. Robinson. "Elements to Enhance the Successful Start and Completion of Program and Policy Evaluations: The Injury & Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute." Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation 16, no. 37 (November 19, 2020): 58–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i37.659.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Public health practitioners, including injury and violence prevention (IVP) professionals, are responsible for implementing evaluations, but often lack formal evaluation training. Impacts of many practitioner-focused evaluation trainings—particularly their ability to help participants successfully start and complete evaluations—are unknown. Objectives: We assessed the impact of the Injury and Violence Prevention (IVP) Program & Policy Evaluation Institute (“Evaluation Institute”), a team-based, multidisciplinary, and practitioner-focused evaluation training designed to teach state IVP practitioners and their cross-sector partners how to evaluate program and policy interventions. Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of 13 evaluation teams across eight states at least one year after training participation (24 participants in total). Document reviews were conducted to triangulate, supplement, and contextualize reported improvements to policies, programs, and practices. Intervention: Teams of practitioners applied for and participated in the Evaluation Institute, a five-month evaluation training initiative that included a set of online training modules, an in-person workshop, and technical support from evaluation consultants. Main Outcome Measure(s): The successful start and/or completion of a program or policy evaluation focused on an IVP intervention. Results: Of the 13 teams studied, a total of 12 teams (92%) reported starting or completing an evaluation. Four teams (31%) reported fully completing their evaluations; eight teams (61%) reported partially completing their evaluations. Teams identified common facilitators and barriers that impacted their ability to start and complete their evaluations. Nearly half of the 13 teams (46%) – whether or not they completed their evaluation – reported at least one common improvement made to a program or policy as a result of engaging in an evaluative process. Conclusion: Practitioner-focused evaluation trainings are essential to build critical evaluation skills among public health professionals and their multidisciplinary partners. The process of evaluating an intervention—even if the evaluation is not completed—has substantial value and can drive improvements to public health interventions. The Evaluation Institute can serve as a model for training public health practitioners and their partners to successfully plan, start, complete, and utilize evaluations to improve programs and policies. Keywords: Evaluation; injury; multidisciplinary partnerships; practitioner-focused evaluation training; professional development; program and policy evaluation; public health; technical assistance; violence
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

박미경, Jung Ju Ho, 조민효, and 김민길. "Shut-down policy evaluation." Journal of Governance Studies 11, no. 3 (December 2016): 171–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.16973/jgs.2016.11.3.007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Palfrey, Colin, and Paul Thomas. "Politics and policy evaluation." Public Policy and Administration 14, no. 4 (October 1999): 58–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095207679901400405.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

KNOX, COLIN, and DENISE McALISTER. "POLICY EVALUATION: INCORPORATING USERS'VIEWS." Public Administration 73, no. 3 (September 1995): 413–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00836.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Johansen, Elaine. "EVALUATION AS SOCIAL POLICY." Review of Policy Research 6, no. 1 (August 1986): 26–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00644.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Sandberg, Nina, Bjørn Stensaker, and Per Olaf Aamodt. "Evaluation in policy implementation." International Journal of Public Sector Management 15, no. 1 (February 2002): 44–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513550210414587.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

MacDonald, B., and I. Stronach. "The independent policy evaluation." Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 5, no. 1 (March 1989): 51–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1989.tb00197.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Cole, Harold L. "Discussion: Practical policy evaluation." Journal of Monetary Economics 102 (April 2019): 46–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.01.011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Van der Knaap, Peter. "Policy Evaluation and Learning." Evaluation 1, no. 2 (July 1995): 189–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638909500100205.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Nagel, Stuart. "EVALUATING PUBLIC POLICY EVALUATION." Policy Studies Journal 16, no. 2 (December 1987): 219–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1987.tb00776.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Brock, William A., and Steven N. Durlauf. "On Sturdy Policy Evaluation." Journal of Legal Studies 44, S2 (June 2015): S447—S473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/684307.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Cabatoff, Kenneth A. "Getting On and Off the Policy Agenda: A Dualistic Theory of Program Evaluation Utilization." Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 11, no. 2 (September 1996): 35–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.11.002.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract: This article deals with the impact of program evaluation on policy making and, more specifically, on policy making with regard to home care and services for the elderly in Québec. Three important evaluations have influenced policy making in this area since 1983. The article proposes a “policy communities” framework to explain why and how these evaluations either influenced or failed to influence policy. It suggests that program evaluation strategies should reflect the political context in which evaluation takes place, and that the utilization of program evaluation results depends to some extent on program evaluators’ ability to participate effectively in the policy processes in question.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Sheate, William Robert, Clare Twigger-Ross, Liza Papadopoulou, Rolands Sadauskis, Owen White, Paula Orr, and Richard Eales. "Learning Lessons for Evaluating Complexity Across the Nexus: A Meta-Evaluation of Environmental Projects." Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation 16, no. 37 (October 27, 2020): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i37.641.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: A major gap in environmental policy making is learning lessons from past interventions and in integrating the lessons from evaluations that have been undertaken. Institutional memory of such evaluations often resides externally to government, in evaluation practitioner contractors who undertake commissioned evaluations on behalf of government departments. Purpose: The aims were to learn the lessons from past policy evaluations, understand the barriers and enablers to successful evaluations, to explore the value of different types of approaches and methods used for evaluating complexity, and how evaluations were used in practice. Setting: A meta-evaluation of 23 environmental evaluations undertaken by Collingwood Environmental Planning Ltd (CEP), London, UK was undertaken by CEP staff under the auspices of CECAN (the Centre for Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus – a UK Research Councils funded centre, coordinated by the University of Surrey, UK). The research covered water, environment and climate change nexus issues, including evaluations of flood risk, biodiversity, landscape, land use, climate change, catchment management, community resilience, bioenergy, and European Union (EU) Directives. Intervention: Not applicable. Research design: A multiple embedded case study design was adopted, selecting 23 CEP evaluation cases from across a 10-year period (2006-2016). Four overarching research questions were posed by the meta-evaluation and formed the basis for more specific evaluation questions, answered on the basis of documented project final reports and supplemented by interviews with CEP project managers. Thematic analysis was used to draw out common themes from across the case categories. Findings: Policy context invariably framed the complex evaluations; as environmental policy has been spread beyond the responsibility of government to encompass multiple stakeholders, so policy around nexus issues was often found to be in a state of constant flux. Furthermore, an explicit theory of change was only often first elaborated as part of the evaluation process, long after the policy intervention had already been initiated. A better understanding of the policy context, its state of flux or stability as well as clarity of policy intervention’s objectives (and theory of change) could help significantly in designing policy evaluations that can deliver real value for policy makers. Evaluations have other valuable uses aside from immediate instrumental use in revising policy and can be tailored to maximise those values where such potential impact is recognised. We suggest a series of questions that practitioners and commissioners could usefully ask themselves when starting out on a new complex policy evaluation. Keywords: evaluation; complexity; policy use; natural environment
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Ligero Lasa, Juan A. "Evaluation and Limitations of Social Interventions: The Case of Spain." Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation 6, no. 14 (June 8, 2010): 68–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i14.270.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Although the number and practice of evaluation varies enormously among policy areas, there are very few studies about the unequal evaluation development in the different policy sectors. Purpose: This article aims to (1) acknowledge the different evaluation development among different policy sectors in Spain (2) identify the factors and causes that provoke this disproportion, and (3) explore potential consequences of this unequal distribution of evaluation studies among policy areas. Setting: Spain. Intervention: Public polices in Spain. Research Design: A sample of evaluations is classified by policy sector and the number of evaluations in each sector is analyzed and compared. Then, other significant variables are identified for explaining differences among sectors. Data Collection and Analysis: The cases (evaluation studies) are drawn from two samples: (1) a data base of evaluation studies and (2) a survey to Spanish evaluators held in 2009. The comparison was done with difference in proportions, adjusted standardised residuals and crosstabs. Findings: Analysis of Spanish evaluations shows that program evaluations are much more frequent in the social policies’ area than in the areas of security, defense or justice. A variable with a high ability to predict whether or not evaluations will be carried out is identified: the selective versus universal nature of the policies being evaluated. Selective interventions are more frequently evaluated than universal policies. This lack of balance makes selective interventions more prone to severe critical analysis. This evaluation bias, in turn, produces a series of perverse effects such as a greater probability of cutting down programs based on selective application strategies. Keywords: Evaluation, social policies, pubic policy, Spain, policy limitation
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Widmer, Thomas. "Wechselwirkungen von Politik und Evaluation: Befunde aus der Schweiz." der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 13, no. 1-2020 (June 25, 2020): 44–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3224/dms.v13i1.07.

Full text
Abstract:
Der Beitrag stellt ein Forschungsprogramm vor, das sich mit den Wechselwirkungen zwischen der Evaluation und der Politik in der Schweiz befasst. Zuerst weist der Artikel auf ausgewählte Merkmale des schweizerischen politischen Systems hin, die für die weitere Diskussion besonders relevant sind. Danach geht der Beitrag in knapper Form auf die Entwicklung der Evaluation in der Schweiz ein. Im Anschluss wird die übergreifende Fragestellung und der analytische Rahmen des Sinergia-Forschungsprogramms «Policy Evaluation in the Swiss Political System – Roots and Fruits (SynEval)» des Schweizerischen Nationalfonds vorgestellt. Die vier, in diesem Rahmen realisierten Forschungsprojekte zu Evaluations- und Verwaltungskulturen, zu Evaluationsklauseln, zur Bedeutung von Evaluationsbefunden in direktdemokratischen Kampagnen sowie zur Rolle der Evaluation in den schweizerischen Parlamenten werden in knapper Form mit ausgewählten Befunden zum Verhältnis von Evaluation und Politik präsentiert. Der Beitrag schliesst mit einigen weiterführenden Überlegungen zur Forschung über Evaluation und zur Entwicklung der Evaluation in der Schweiz.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Sanderson, Ian. "Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence‐Based Policy Making." Public Administration 80, no. 1 (January 2002): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00292.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Udagawa, Takuma, Haruka Kiyohara, Yusuke Narita, Yuta Saito, and Kei Tateno. "Policy-Adaptive Estimator Selection for Off-Policy Evaluation." Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 37, no. 8 (June 26, 2023): 10025–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i8.26195.

Full text
Abstract:
Off-policy evaluation (OPE) aims to accurately evaluate the performance of counterfactual policies using only offline logged data. Although many estimators have been developed, there is no single estimator that dominates the others, because the estimators' accuracy can vary greatly depending on a given OPE task such as the evaluation policy, number of actions, and noise level. Thus, the data-driven estimator selection problem is becoming increasingly important and can have a significant impact on the accuracy of OPE. However, identifying the most accurate estimator using only the logged data is quite challenging because the ground-truth estimation accuracy of estimators is generally unavailable. This paper thus studies this challenging problem of estimator selection for OPE for the first time. In particular, we enable an estimator selection that is adaptive to a given OPE task, by appropriately subsampling available logged data and constructing pseudo policies useful for the underlying estimator selection task. Comprehensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world company data demonstrate that the proposed procedure substantially improves the estimator selection compared to a non-adaptive heuristic. Note that complete version with technical appendix is available on arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13904.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Larsen, Marianne A. "A Critical Analysis of Teacher Evaluation Policy Trends." Australian Journal of Education 49, no. 3 (November 2005): 292–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000494410504900306.

Full text
Abstract:
Modernising the teaching profession has become one of the main goals of contemporary educational system reform. The evaluation of teachers has been integral to the new teacher quality policies and programs. This article provides a comparative and critical analysis of the evaluations that teachers now confront during their professional careers. Examples of teacher evaluation practices and processes from Australia, Canada, the United States, and England are described and analysed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

I-chun, Liu, and Chen Chii-ching. "A Comparative Analysis of Elitist and Public Opinion Evaluation of National Health Insurance Policy Performance." JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH 10, no. 4 (November 30, 2016): 2206–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v10i4.4705.

Full text
Abstract:
This study discusses evaluation of National Health Insurance policy, using the policy Delphi method to obtain elite opinion on evaluation indicators of the policy and a telephone survey to collect general public opinion. Results indicated that the elite and the general public share a consensus on policy performance. The findings suggest that evaluations of NHI policy that incorporate elite and general public assessments may be preferable to evaluations based on assessments from just one sector of the population. Moreover, performance assessment should integrate the opinions of different representative sections of the population, as well as professional and democratic principles of decision-making. The study also provides evidence that public opinion and elite evaluation are correlated and shows considerable consistency in the evaluation of NHI policy regardless of the policy knowledge of the evaluators.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Giacomini, M., and J. Hurley. "Understanding Economic Evaluation: A Policy Perspective for Clinicians." Canadian Respiratory Journal 4, no. 4 (1997): 190–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/858263.

Full text
Abstract:
The rhetoric of ‘efficiency’ frames much current debate about how limited health care resources should be used. Clinicians increasingly turn to economic evaluation literature to discern evidence-based claims of ‘efficiency’ or ‘cost effectiveness’ from empty ones. Economic evaluation research is designed to compare health services on the basis of their efficiency (eg, how well they produce health benefits relative to resource costs). Although economic studies appear throughout the respirology literature, relatively few are complete economic evaluations. Economic evaluation studies serve various purposes, including critical evaluation and persuasive marketing, which produce studies that vary in research agendas and scientific rigour. This paper is intended to serve clinicians and consumers of economic evaluation studies by: introducing economic evaluation research information as a policy making tool; describing the three basic elements and three basic types of economic evaluation (cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility analyses); and reviewing some limitations of economic evaluation information for policy decision making. The usefulness of economic evaluation research for policy making depends not only on the scientific merit of the analysis but also crucially on whose specific concerns the research questions address.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Levanon, Liat. "The Law of Police Entrapment: Critical Evaluation and Policy Analysis." Criminal Law Forum 27, no. 1 (January 29, 2016): 35–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10609-015-9271-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Tuilan, Jeane, and Basikin. "Factors Influencing the Evaluation Process of Teacher Professional Allowance Policy." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24, no. 02 (February 12, 2020): 2312–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i2/pr200526.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Greene, Francis J. "Assessing the Impact of Policy Interventions: The Influence of Evaluation Methodology." Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27, no. 2 (April 2009): 216–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c07103b.

Full text
Abstract:
Using the case of the Prince's Trust, the preeminent UK youth enterprise programme, I investigate how different evaluation methodologies generate radically different evidence of the impact of the programme. The key result is that simpler forms of evaluation tend to provide positive support for this programme, whereas more sophisticated evaluations are not so positive. I discuss the implications of this for the way stakeholders should view evaluations. I urge caution about the claims made for programmes that receive only lighter forms of evaluation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Vial, Daniel, and Vijay Subramanian. "Empirical Policy Evaluation With Supergraphs." IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory 2, no. 2 (June 2021): 641–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/jsait.2021.3073257.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

NAKAGAWA, Masayuki. "Evaluation of Regional Revitalization Policy." Japanese Journal of Real Estate Sciences 29, no. 2 (2015): 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5736/jares.29.2_27.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Oudiz, Gilles. "European Policy Coordination: An Evaluation." Recherches économiques de Louvain 51, no. 3-4 (December 1985): 301–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0770451800082658.

Full text
Abstract:
According to the European Community Commission the present level of unemployment in Europe should not only last but worsen in the foreseeable future (see CCE 1984). By 1988 the overall unemployment rate in Europe should reach 11,4% if the « optimistic » assumptions retained for the labor supply are to be realized.These are of course average figures but on the whole they correctly reflect the extraordinary convergence of European deflationary policies. Given structural differences, which remain very limited when one compares them to the other Western economies, the European governments seem to have settled for the same macroeconomic strategies. Of course, they have chosen different timings. France, for example, has grown more than its partners in 1981-1982 but is now experiencing a prolonged recession. Whereas West Germany is doing better as far as GNP is concerned but grew very little in the early 80 s. On the whole however a back of the envelope calculation of « sacrifice ratios » for the leading European economies would yield quite similar results. All over Europe disinflation has been achieved at a high output cost and it is not clear that any country has really done better than its partners.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Greene, Jennifer C., and Evert Vedung. "Public Policy and Program Evaluation." Administrative Science Quarterly 44, no. 2 (June 1999): 433. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Carlsson, Lars. "Non-Hierarchical Evaluation of Policy." Evaluation 6, no. 2 (April 2000): 201–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13563890022209217.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Sanderson, Ian. "Evaluation in Complex Policy Systems." Evaluation 6, no. 4 (October 2000): 433–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13563890022209415.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Blomberg, Thomas G., and Gordon P. Waldo. "Evaluation Research, Policy, and Politics." Evaluation Review 26, no. 3 (June 2002): 340–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01941x026003007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Nioche, Jean-Pierre, and Robert Poinsard. "Public Policy Evaluation in France." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5, no. 1 (1985): 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3323413.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

OTA, Naoko. "A History of Evaluation Policy." Journal of Educational Sociology 72 (2003): 21–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.11151/eds1951.72.21.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Saks, Michael J. "Legal policy analysis and evaluation." American Psychologist 44, no. 8 (1989): 1110–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.8.1110.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Kabat, P. "Systems Science for Policy Evaluation." Science 336, no. 6087 (June 14, 2012): 1398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1224642.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Mirzanti, Isti Raafaldini, Togar M. Simatupang, and Dwi Larso. "Evaluation of emerging entrepreneurship policy." International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies 11, no. 1/2 (2018): 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijepee.2018.091034.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Larso, Dwi, Isti Raafaldini Mirzanti, and Togar M. Simatupang. "Evaluation of emerging entrepreneurship policy." International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies 11, no. 1/2 (2018): 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijepee.2018.10012090.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Nagel, Stuart S. "Evaluation Research and Policy Studies." Evaluation News 6, no. 2 (May 1985): 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821408500600213.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Brennan, Timothy J. "Behavioral economics and policy evaluation." Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 5, no. 1 (January 2014): 89–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2013-0022.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract:Behavioral economics posits a number of cognitive biases and limitations, which raises questions as to whether revealed willingness to pay equals true willingness to pay. If so, benefit-cost analysis, with a number of methodological advantages, would need to be replaced. Prior analyses of the issue by Sunstein, Sugden, and Bernheim and Rangel fail to offer guidance that would avoid substituting centralized judgments for decentralized information on benefits and costs. Alternatives including using post-implementation valuations, libertarian paternalism, and direct democracy on policy issues also have conceptual or practical limitations. A tentative suggestion is democratic delegation, somewhat appealing because it is already applied to cope with bounded rationality and non-efficiency values. Viewing benefit-cost analysis as a market analogue, and restricting the domain of behavioral economics to uninformed consumers, may be useful guides. The most important guidance may be to require very strong evidence of substantial choice failure before abandoning benefit-cost analysis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

OHKUSA, Yasushi, Tamie SUGAWARA, Masahiro MINO, Yasuhiro SHIMAUCHI, Takashi OZAKI, Yoshihiro KAGAWA, and Nobuhiko OKABE. "Varricela Vaccination Policy Subsidy Evaluation." Kansenshogaku Zasshi 84, no. 2 (2010): 159–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.84.159.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Kenkel, Donald S., and Willard Manning. "Economic evaluation of nutrition policy." Food Policy 24, no. 2-3 (May 1999): 145–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0306-9192(99)00019-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography