Relevant bibliographies by topics / Platonic dialogues

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Platonic dialogues'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 13 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Platonic dialogues.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Platonic dialogues"

1

O’Brien, Carl S. "Platonic Dialogues and Platonic Principles." International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 15, no. 1 (May 3, 2021): 90–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18725473-12341490.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Wolfsdorf, D. "The historical reader of Plato's Protagoras." Classical Quarterly 48, no. 1 (May 1998): 126–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cq/48.1.126.

Full text
Abstract:
The popular question why Plato wrote dramatic dialogues, which is motivated by a just fascination and perplexity for contemporary scholars about the unique form of the Platonic texts, is confused and anachronistic; for it judges the Platonic texts qua philosophical texts in terms of post–Platonic texts not written in dramatic dialogic form. In comparison with these, the form of Platos early aporetic dialogues is highly unusual. Yet, in its contemporary milieu, the form of Platonic literature is relatively normal. Dramatic dialogue was the most popular form of Attic literature in the late fifth and fourth centuries. This explains why Plato wrote dramatic dialogues.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kenyon, Erik. "Platonic Pedagogy in Augustine’s Dialogues." Ancient Philosophy 34, no. 1 (2014): 151–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20143419.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Michelini, Ann N. "THE STRUCTURE OF PLATONIC DIALOGUES." Classical Review 52, no. 2 (September 2002): 251–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cr/52.2.251.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Griswold, Charles L. "Irony in the Platonic Dialogues." Philosophy and Literature 26, no. 1 (2002): 84–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/phl.2002.0012.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Osborne, Catherine. "Socrates in the Platonic Dialogues." Philosophical Investigations 29, no. 1 (January 2006): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00272.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

McCoy, Marina. "Perspectivism and the philosophical rhetoric of the dialogue form." PLATO JOURNAL 16 (July 5, 2017): 49–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_16_5.

Full text
Abstract:
In this paper, I support the perspectivist reading of the Platonic dialogues. The dialogues assert an objective truth toward which we are meant to strive, and yet acknowledge that we as seekers of this truth are always partial in what we grasp of its nature. They are written in a way to encourage the development of philosophical practice in their readers, where “philosophical” means not only having an epistemic state in between the total possession of truth and its absence, but also growing in selfknowledge as being that kind of a being. I take up three particular qualities of the dialogue: they are multilayered, multivocal, and mimetic. Devices such as Platonic irony, multiple characters’ voices, and a reformulated notion of mimesis that encourages the development of rationality and autonomy are central to Platonic rhetoric and philosophy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Press, Gerald A. "The Play of the Platonic Dialogues." Ancient Philosophy 18, no. 2 (1998): 477–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil199818243.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lönborg, Sven. "The Chronology of the Platonic Dialogues." Theoria 5, no. 2 (February 11, 2008): 141–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1939.tb00451.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Goncharko, Oksana, and Dmitry Goncharko. "The Dialogue On Aristotle Categories by Porphyry as a Platonic Dialogue." ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition 13, no. 1 (2019): 83–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-83-93.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper focuses on interactive dialogue-form strategies in the framework of the late antique Greek and early Byzantine logical traditions. The dialogue by Porphyry On Aristotle Categories is a perfect example of the Neoplatonic approach to build logic in a Plato style. The main protagonistresses of the dialogue are The Question and The Answer, who act as collocutors do in traditional Platonic dialogues. It is proposed to consider the dialogue in the context of three perspectives: in accordance with the tradition of the Platonic dialogue; in the light of Aristotle’s education system; in its relation to the late antique and medieval Greek logical dialogue experiments.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Platonic dialogues"

1

Tausch-Pebody, Gudrun. "Form and content in eight platonic dialogues." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.243068.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dypedokk, Johnsen Hege. "Erôs and Education : Socratic Seduction in Three Platonic Dialogues." Doctoral thesis, Stockholms universitet, Filosofiska institutionen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-133025.

Full text
Abstract:
Plato’s Socrates is famous for claiming that “I know one thing: That I know nothing” (see e.g. Ap. 21d and Meno 81d). There is one subject that Socrates repeatedly claims to have expertise in, however: ta erôtika (see e.g. Symp. 198d1). Socrates also refers to this expertise as his erôtikê technê (Phdr. 257a7–8), which may be translated as “erotic expertise”. In this dissertation, I investigate Socrates’ erotic expertise: what kind of expertise is it, what is it constituted by, where is it put into practice, and how is it practiced? I argue that the purposes this expertise serve are, to a significant extent, educational in nature. After first having clarified the dissertation’s topic and aim, as well as my methodological approach, I present an initial account of erôs and Socrates’ erotic expertise. While discussing what constitutes Socrates’ erotic expertise, I account for two erotic educational methods: midwifery and matchmaking. I further argue that these methods tend to be accompanied by two psychological techniques, namely charming and shaming. I argue that these methods and techniques are systematically applied by Socrates when he puts his erotic expertise into practice. In the dissertation, three dialogues where Socrates practices his erotic expertise are scrutinized: Lysis, Charmides, and Alcibiades I. I focus on Socrates’ encounters with the eponymous youths of the dialogues, and each dialogue is devoted a chapter of its own. I show how these dialogues are erotically charged, and also how Socrates in these dialogues demonstrates his erotic expertise. I argue that Socrates’ expertise on erôs plays an essential role in his attempts to engage the three youths in the processes of self-cultivation, learning, and the very practice of philosophy. In the final chapter of the dissertation I turn to some questions that arise in light of my readings, and summarize the results of my investigation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Coventry, Lucinda Jane. "Understanding and literary form in Plato : with special reference to the early and middle dialogues." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.303503.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ricciardone, Chiara Teresa. "Disease and Difference in Three Platonic Dialogues| Gorgias, Phaedo, and Timaeus." Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2018. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10615142.

Full text
Abstract:

This study traces a persistent connection between the image of disease and the concept of difference in Plato’s Gorgias, Phaedo, and Timaeus. Whether the disease occurs in the body, soul, city, or cosmos, it always signals an unassimilated difference that is critical to the argument. I argue that Plato represents—and induces—diseases of difference in order to produce philosophers, skilled in the art of differentiation. Because his dialogues intensify rather than cure difference, his philosophy is better characterized as a “higher pathology” than a form of therapy.

An introductory section on Sophist lays out the main features of the concept of difference-in-itself and concisely presents its connection to disease. The main chapters examine the relationship in different realms. In the first chapter, the problem is moral and political: in the Gorgias, rhetoric is a corrupting force, while philosophy purifies the city and soul by drawing distinctions. In the second chapter on Phaedo, the problem is epistemological: if we correctly interpret the illness of misology, as the despair caused by the inability to consistently distinguish truth and falsity, we can resolve the mystery of Socrates’ cryptic last words (“We owe a cock to Asclepius; pay the debt and do not neglect it”). In the third chapter on Timaeus, Plato treats diseases of the soul, the body, and the cosmos itself. There, the correlation between disease and difference actually helps humans situate themselves in the vast universe—for in both cases, proper differentiation is the key to a healthy, well-constructed life.

My emphasis on Plato’s theory of difference counters the traditional focus on his theory of Forms. Elucidating the link between the concept of difference and the experience of disease has broader impact for the ageless question of how we should live our lives. In Plato’s system, neither disease nor difference is a wholly negative element to be eradicated. Instead, difference and disease, in their proper proportions, are responsible for the fullness of the world and the emergence of the philosophical subject.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Woolf, Raphael Graham. "Socrates and the self : the mapping of internal relations in some early Platonic dialogues." Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 1992. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.267307.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Evanson, Doris Muriel. "Imitation and inspiration : aspects of literary theory in early and middle-period platonic dialogues." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1989. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/28219.

Full text
Abstract:
Two theories of literature may be found in the dialogues of Plato: 1) the theory that the poet is inspired and his poetry the product of inspiration, and 2) the theory that the poet is an imitator and his poetry imitation. The two theories are distinct: inspiration is a theory of composition; imitation is a theory about the relation of language to its subject matter. Yet both theories are present in the Platonic corpus and in some cases in the same general context. This thesis will explore various aspects of these theories and will consider the problem of whether the two are in any way compatible. Our study will deal, in chronological order, with three of Plato's early and middle-period dialogues, the Ion, the Symposium, and the Republic. The Ion treats explicitly the topic of poetic inspiration and contains implicitly the concept of poetic imitation. The theory of inspiration presented in this dialogue differs from the traditional view in two significant ways: 1) in its exaggerated portrayal of the possessed poet, and 2) in its exaggerated emphasis on the element of inspiration in the poetic process. Plato here presents an exaggerated theory of inspiration in order to emphasize the dangers inherent in poetry and to discredit the poets' claims to wisdom and knowledge. The theory of imitation implicit in this dialogue is similarly exaggerated and pejorative. The Symposium repeats, with significant variations, the themes of the Ion. The inadequacy of the poet as regards wisdom is demonstrated in a literary agon between poet and philosopher. A new theory of inspiration is introduced, a theory of philosophic inspiration that transmutes and transcends the theory of poetic inspiration. The Republic deals explicitly with the topic of imitation and implicitly with the subject of inspiration. The theory of poetic imitation presented in Book X is an exaggeration of an earlier concept: the imitative poet of Book X is an "imitator" in the lowest and most pejorative sense of the word. Plato here, as in the Ion, presents an exaggerated theory of literature in order to refute the exaggerated claims made by and for the poets. Elsewhere in the Republic there are suggestions of a higher and truer concept of literary creativity. Various passages indicate that Plato conceived of both a theory of philosophic imitation and a theory of philosophic inspiration. In the Ion and in Book X of the Republic. Plato presents two diverse and incompatible theories in order to prove identical points. In both cases he exaggerates the deficiencies in order to emphasize the dangers of the poet and his poetry. Neither the theory of poetic inspiration in the Ion nor the theory of poetic imitation in Book X of the Republic is presented by Plato as a valid theory of literature. In the Symposium and in various passages throughout the Republic. Plato presents a theory of inspiration, and a theory of imitation that are valid and compatible. Here, both inspiration and imitation are taken up into the realm of philosophy. Philosophic imitation is imitation of the Forms; philosophic inspiration is inspiration by the Forms. At this highest level the two theories of literature coalesce .and become one: the ideal Form is, for the philosopher-poet, both his object of imitation and his source of inspiration.
Arts, Faculty of
Classical, Near Eastern and Religious Studies, Department of
Graduate
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Seferoglu, Tonguc. "The Importance Of The Meno On The Transition From The Early To The Middle Platonic Dialogues." Master's thesis, METU, 2012. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12614326/index.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of the present study is to signify the explanatory value of the Meno on the coherence as well as the disparateness of the Plato&rsquo
s early and middle dialogues. Indeed, the Meno exposes the transition on the content and form of these dialogues. The first part of the dialogue resembles the Socrates&rsquo
way of investigation, the so-called Elenchus, whereas Plato presents his own philosophical project in the second part of the dialogue. Three fundamental elements of Plato&rsquo
s middle dialogues explicitly arise for the very first time in the Meno, namely
the recollection, the hypothetical method and reasoning out the explanation. Therefore, the connexion of the early and middle dialogues can be understood better if the structure of the Meno is analyzed properly. In other words, the Meno is the keystone dialogue which enables the readers of Plato to sense the development in Socratic-Platonic philosophy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kritikakos, Evangelos 1970. "Apocryphal Plato : the problematic of the subject in Plato's mimetology : a study of four Platonic dialogues." Monash University, School of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, 2003. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/5561.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

BRANDAO, RENATO MATOSO RIBEIRO GOMES. "THE ONTOLOGY OF SOCRATES IN THE PLATONIC DIALOGUES: FROM THE SEARCH FOR DEFINITIONS TO THE CRITICISM OF THE PARMENIDES." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2014. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=24544@1.

Full text
Abstract:
PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO
A tese pretende investigar a ontologia defendida pelo personagem Sócrates nos diálogos platônicos. Em oposição à interpretação majoritariamente aceita, que atribui ao personagem Sócrates a adesão a duas ontologias distintas, defendo a hipótese de que o Sócrates dos diálogos platônicos argumenta consistentemente a partir de uma única proposta ontológica. Esta proposta consiste na postulação de entidades inteligíveis realmente existentes que atuam como causa das propriedades dos objetos sensíveis. A tese divide-se em duas partes. Na primeira parte, começo por analisar as particularidades da composição platônica, assim como a formação do paradigma atual de leitura das obras de Platão. Em um segundo momento, tomo como foco os diálogos iniciais e defendo que a ontologia subjacente à argumentação de Sócrates nestas obras é a mesma que encontramos nos diálogos médios. No último capítulo da primeira parte, apresento a argumentação socrática dos diálogos médios e demonstro como, nestas obras, a ontologia dos diálogos iniciais é apresentada de maneira explícita e mais informativa. A segunda parte da tese consiste em uma análise das críticas à Teoria das Ideias que encontramos no diálogo Parmênides. No primeiro momento desta segunda parte, argumento que o Sócrates do Parmênides está, novamente, defendendo a mesma proposta ontológica dos diálogos médios e iniciais. Posteriormente, demonstro como as críticas formuladas pelo personagem Parmênides são válidas e realmente apresentam problemas relevantes para teoria socrática.
This dissertation aims to investigate the ontology proposed by the character Socrates in the Platonic dialogues. In opposition tothe mostly accepted interpretation which attributes to the character Socrates the adoption of two distinct ontologies, I defend the hypothesis that the Socrates of the Platonic dialogues consistently argues from within a single ontological theory. This theory consists in the postulation of real and existing intelligible entities that act as the cause of the properties of sensible objects. The dissertation is divided in two parts. In the first part, I analyze the particularities of the Platonic composition as well as the construction of the actual reading paradigm of the Platonic works. In a second moment, I start investigating the first dialogues and claim that the ontological theory that underlies Socrates arguments in these works is the same as the one we can find in the middle dialogues. In the last chapter of the first part, I expose the Socratic arguments from the middle dialogues and I show how, in these woks, the underlying ontology of the first dialogues is more explicitly and informatively presented. The second part of the dissertation consists in an analysis of the critiques of the Theory of Forms that we find in the Parmenides dialogue. In the first moment of this second part, I argue that the Socrates from the Parmenides is again defending the same ontological theory from the middle and first dialogues. Afterwards, I show how the critiques constructed by the character Parmenides are valid and do present significant problems to the ontological theory of Socrates.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Di, Stefano Martina. "Les interlocuteurs de Socrate dans les Dialogues de Platon." Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes (ComUE), 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018GREAP002.

Full text
Abstract:
Durant les dernières décennies, l’attention à la « forme dialogue » a ouvert la voie à un renouvellement radical des études platoniciennes et à un intérêt, quoique limité, aux personnages des Dialogues. Cet intérêt s’est toutefois focalisé presque exclusivement sur Socrate et sur la définition des traits de son personnage. En revanche, on n’a guère orienté les recherches sur les interlocuteurs ; cette thèse vise donc à montrer leur rôle fondamental dans la communauté discursive de six dialogues : Alcibiade Majeur, Charmide, Théétète, Gorgias, République (livres I, II et V), Philèbe. Tout d’abord, certains personnages incarnent les antagonistes de Socrate et « représentent les dimensions culturelles et les nœuds théoriques actifs et présents au sein de la société à laquelle Platon renvoie dans son réexamen critique » (Vegetti). À cet égard, leur présence s’avère importante pour observer comment les Dialogues sont moins l’exposition d’une doctrine que la mise en scène d’un autre rapport au savoir, permettant ainsi de définir a contrario la philosophia. À partir de la liste que Socrate lui-même dresse dans l’Apologie, nous avons dès lors établi une typologie qui oppose les rivaux de Socrate et les jeunes. Au sein de ces deux catégories majeures, nous avons pu apprécier des différences concernant l'âge et l'attitude à l'égard du savoir. Avant d’entamer l’analyse des personnages il a été toutefois nécessaire de définir ce que l’on entend par « interlocuteur ». Les textes montrent en effet de nombreuses nuances dans leur interaction ou leur présence et la définition des traits qui caractérisent les interlocuteurs a été fondamentale pour l'analyse des textes. Les termes ont été groupés en deux catégories : ceux qui identifient les interlocuteurs sur la base de la destination de la conversation (public, auditeurs, spectateurs, présents/absents) et d'autres qui décrivent la relation des interlocuteurs avec Socrate et avec le discours. L'analyse du corpus a été ensuite orientée à partir de la définition du dialogue de Diogène Laërce (Diog. Laer. 3.48.7-11.), qui nous a permis de déceler deux éléments fondamentaux des échanges dialogiques : la pratique discursive, à savoir l’enchaînement des questions et réponses, et la caractérisation des interlocuteurs. Nous avons ainsi pu relever que les traits de caractère et les caractéristiques sociales des interlocuteurs déterminent leur capacité de dialoguer. Cet examen a donc confirmé que la typologie de l’Apologie et le lexique définissant l'interlocuteurs ne restent pas lettre morte dans les Dialogues, mais sont avant tout mis en scène grâce aux interlocuteurs. Enfin, nous avons examiné trois phénomènes discursifs qui entravent le dialogue ou qui ne remplissent pas toutes les conditions de l'échange dialectique : le silence, l'ironie et le recours aux images. Si Platon veut sans doute montrer, à travers ces obstacles, l’impossibilité de « tisser un discours commun en l’absence d’un monde partagé de valeurs » (Fussi), c’est aussi parce qu’il reconnaît que la persuasion philosophique ne saurait s’exercer qu'au-delà de la fiction dialogique
Over the last decades the attention to the dialogue form has paved the way for a radical renewal of the Platonic studies and for an interest, although limited, in the Dialogues’ characters. The interest has yet been focused almost exclusively on Socrates and the definition of the traits of his character. Instead, too little attention has been paid to his interlocutors; therefore, this thesis aims to show their crucial role in the discursive community of six dialogues: First Alcibiades, Charmides, Theaetetus, Gorgias, Republic (books I, II and V), Philaebus. Firstly, some characters embody Socrates' antagonists and 'represent the cultural dimensions and the theoretical issues alive in the society to which Plato refers in his critical re-examination' (Vegetti). In this respect, their presence is important to observe how the Dialogues are less the exposition of a doctrine than the staging of another kind of relationship to knowledge, thus defining a contrario what philosophia means to him. Starting from the list that Socrates himself sketches in the Apology, I have established a typology that opposes Socrates' rivals and the young people. Within these two major categories, we could appreciate differences in their age and attitude towards knowledge. Before starting to analyze the characters, it was however necessary to define what being an 'interlocutor' means. Indeed, the platonic texts show many nuances in the interaction or presence of the interlocutors and the definition of their features was fundamental for the subsequent analysis of the texts. The terms have been grouped into two categories: one who identify the interlocutors on the basis of the destination of the conversation (audience, listeners, spectators, presents / absents) and another who describe the relationship of the interlocutors with Socrates and to the discourse. The analysis of the corpus was then guided by the definition of the dialogue of Diogenes Laerce (Diog.Lerer 3.48.7-11.), which allows us to detect two fundamental elements of dialogical exchanges: the discursive practice, that is the sequence of questions and answers, and the characterization of interlocutors (ethopoiia). We could observe that the psychological and social ethos of the interlocutors as well as their knowledge of the dialectical rules determine their ability to dialogue. This review has confirmed that the typology of the Apology and the normative definition of the interlocutor proposed by the Dialogues are really staged thanks to the interlocutors. Finally, we have analyzed three discursive phenomena that hinder dialogue or do not fulfill all the conditions of dialectical exchanges: silence, irony and the use of images. Through them Plato probably wants to show the impossibility of 'weaving a common discourse in the absence of a shared world of values' (Fussi), mainly because he recognizes that philosophical persuasion must be addressed beyond the dialogic fiction
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Platonic dialogues"

1

Iris, Murdoch. Acastos: Two platonic dialogues. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Iris, Murdoch. Acastos: Two Platonic dialogues. London: Chatto & Windus, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Iris, Murdoch. Acastos: Two Platonic dialogues. New York, NY: Viking, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Iris, Murdoch. Acastos: Two Platonic dialogues. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

The play of the Platonic dialogues. New York: Peter Lang Pub., 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tofighian, Omid. Myth and Philosophy in Platonic Dialogues. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Sallis, John. Being and logos: Reading the Platonic dialogues. 3rd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Finitude and transcendence in the Platonic dialogues. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sallis, John. Being and logos: The way of Platonic dialogue. 2nd ed. Atlantic Highlands, N.J: Humanities Press International, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Rutherford, R. B. The art of Plato: Ten essays in Platonic interpretation. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Platonic dialogues"

1

Angier, Tom. "TechnĒ in the Platonic Dialogues." In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Skill And Expertise, 65–75. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2021. | Series: Routledge handbooks in philosophy: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315180809-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dusenbury, David Lloyd. "The Platonic Dialogues and Legal Critique." In SpringerBriefs in Philosophy, 9–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59843-7_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Páez, Ciro. "Desire and Madness: Platonic Dialogues on Education." In Desire and Human Flourishing, 153–66. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47001-2_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hyland, Drew A. "Philosophy and Tragedy in the Platonic Dialogues." In Tragedy and Philosophy, 123–38. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22759-4_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tofighian, Omid. "Myth and Philosophy on Stage: Connections, Divisions, and Interdependence." In Myth and Philosophy in Platonic Dialogues, 1–32. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tofighian, Omid. "Mutual Scaffolding: Unifying Myth and Philosophy." In Myth and Philosophy in Platonic Dialogues, 33–52. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Tofighian, Omid. "Myth and Instruction: Meno." In Myth and Philosophy in Platonic Dialogues, 55–81. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Tofighian, Omid. "Myth and Partnership: Protagoras." In Myth and Philosophy in Platonic Dialogues, 83–109. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Tofighian, Omid. "Myth and Regulation: Phaedo." In Myth and Philosophy in Platonic Dialogues, 111–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Tofighian, Omid. "Myth and Transition: Phaedrus." In Myth and Philosophy in Platonic Dialogues, 143–72. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Platonic dialogues"

1

Dendrinos, Markos. "Organization of the concepts of the Platonic dialogue Parmenides into a software ontology." In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTEGRATED INFORMATION (IC-ININFO 2014): Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Integrated Information. AIP Publishing LLC, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4907832.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Platonic dialogues' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography