Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Pigliucci / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Pigliucci'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Pigliucci.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 24 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Pigliucci.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Pigliucci, Massimo. "Reply from M. Pigliucci." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, no. 9 (September 1996): 384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)81142-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Pigliucci, Massimo, and Jonathan Kaplan. "Reply from M. Pigliucci and J. Kaplan." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, no. 6 (June 2000): 249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01866-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Lowery, Alyssa. "The Promises and Problems of Two Stoic Big Tents." Symposion 9, no. 1 (2022): 143–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/symposion2022919.

Full text

Abstract:

Stoicism’s tremendous recent popularity provides an opportunity to update the tradition for a contemporary audience. In this paper, I review one such update: Stoicism’s conception as a ‘big tent,’ first as depicted by two prominent figures in contemporary Stoicism – Ryan Holiday and Massimo Pigliucci – then how it fares in light of two challenges, Stoic Resignation and Stoic Reductionism. I conclude by arguing for a self-determination that emphasizes Stoic ethical commitments and attends to its social features, even at the cost of such a big tent.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Stone, J. R. "Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Carl D. Schlichting , Massimo Pigliucci." Quarterly Review of Biology 75, no. 1 (March 2000): 55–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/393292.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Good, Ron. "Massimo Pigliucci: Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk." Science & Education 21, no. 3 (May 6, 2011): 435–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9359-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Radder, Hans. "Maarten Boudry and Massimo Pigliucci (eds.): Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism." Journal for General Philosophy of Science 50, no. 4 (May 2, 2019): 593–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09456-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Pigliucci, Massimo. "Science Wars, Scientism, and Think Tanks." Journal of Cognitive Historiography 5, no. 1-2 (November 6, 2020): 189–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jch.39456.

Full text

Abstract:

The present contribution offers a précis of the second edition of Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk (Pigliucci 2018). The aim of the book is to explore the complex landscape populated by science, pseudoscience, and everything in between, what in philosophy is known as the “demarcation problem.” However, the author maintains that little progress can be done in public understanding and appreciation of science unless we also explore the historical, sociological and psychological motivations that lead people to believe in “nonsense on stilts.” Further, it is incumbent on scientists and science educators to act “virtuously” whenever dealing with pseudoscientific claims, an effort that may be greatly helped by the adoption of a virtue epistemological approach, analogous to virtue ethics in moral philosophy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Pavlov, Alexey. "The “Analytic” Line of the Modern Stoicism: L. Backer, W. Irvine, M. Pigliucci." Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics V, no. 1 (March 31, 2021): 33–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2021-1-33-52.

Full text

Abstract:

This article is dedicated to the “analytic” line in the philosophy of modern stoicism. Modern stoicism is developed as the philosophy of life but in this relation, it is understood as not the collection of speculations around such concepts as “life”, “human” and so on but rather as the philosophy about well living. It indicates that the goal of modern stoicism is integrating the eudemonic stance in the analytic normative ethics in which this movement was raised. Modern stoics explains the applicability of stoic ethics for 21st-century people in the way that their view on the world as they think is similar to such of Hellenistic people in many respects. On the theoretical level, modern stoicism is the attempt of application of ethics of late Stoa to the contemporary naturalistic worldview constituting around the data of natural science. This task is realized by representing the ethics of Rome stoicism as a collection of certain psychological practices. By means of it, it turns out possible to represent stoic ethics as some kind of the “framework” of behavior that is potentially compatible with various worldviews. But in this advantage of modern stoicism there is its main trouble also. Cleared out from metaphysics and based on certain obvious practical premises, this framework of sensible staid behavior tells us nothing about the world and hence couldn't be used as the full-blown worldview. However, the very raising of this movement indicates the need to explicitly formulating the problem of worldview within the analytic philosophy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Tatarczak, Michał. "Philosophy of Pseudoscience. Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, red. Massimo Pigliucci i Maarten Boudry." Roczniki Filozoficzne 63, no. 4 (2015): 231–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rf.2015.63.4-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Love, Alan C. "Review: Massimo Pigliucci and Jonathan Kaplan: Making Sense of Evolution: The Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Biology." Mind 117, no. 465 (January 1, 2008): 201–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzn016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Irvine, William B. "How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life, by Massimo Pigliucci." Teaching Philosophy 42, no. 1 (2019): 71–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/teachphil20194215.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Szokolszky, Ágnes, and Zsolt Palatinus. "Changing views of evolution and their consequences for psychology. From the Modern Synthesis to the Extended Synthesis, and beyond." Transylvanian Journal of Psychology 20, no. 2 (December 20, 2019): 3–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tjp.xx.2.1.

Full text

Abstract:

Reductionist viewpoints have been increasingly replaced by complex systems viewpoints in biological theory and methodology since the turn of the millennium. This tendency has also been reflected in thinking about evolution. Just as the defining evolutionary synthesis of the 20th century - the Modern Synthesis - was born out of the integration of the most up-to-date knowledge of the times, so does a recently emerging new synthesis build on most recent genetic-epigenetic, genomic, eco-devo-evolutionary findings. The "Extended Synthesis" (Pigliucci & Müller, 2010) builds on current understanding of genes, heredity, and multiple evolutionary processes. In this framework, an extended interpretation is offered based on the integration of evolutionary and ecosystem-level processes into the explanation of evolution. In this paper, we aim to review the paths leading to the Extended Synthesis. We aim to present a historically embedded, concise overview of the major issues and developments related to the changing perspectives. The final point of the discussion eventually raises the question: How does psychology relate to the extended view of evolution?

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Marcos, Alfredo. "Massimo Pigliucci: Answers for Aristotle. How Science and Philosophy Can Lead Us to a More Meaningful Life." Science & Education 22, no. 8 (March 14, 2013): 2047–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9584-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Craig, Lindsay R. "Gerd B. Müller and Massimo Pigliucci—Extended Synthesis: Theory Expansion or Alternative? (Biological Theory 5: 275–276, 2010)." Biological Theory 5, no. 4 (December 2010): 395–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/biot_a_00059.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Karnaukh, Vladimir. "Philosophy of Stoicism. Review of the book of M. Pigliucci «How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life»." Administrative consulting, no. 8 (2018): 148–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-8-148-151.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Houran, James, and Henry Bauer. "'Fringe Science'—A Tautology, Not Pariah." Journal of Scientific Exploration 36, no. 2 (August 20, 2022): 207–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.31275/20222527.

Full text

Abstract:

This joint Editorial is uncustomary but motivated by the authors’ shared concern about the problem of scientism, i.e., the excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge or techniques (Bauer, 2014; Gasparatou, 2017; Pigliucci, 2018) or what some authors have described as the arrogance of scientific authority (Butler, 2015). On this issue, Frank (2021) noted that The most important reason [scientism] is a mistake is because it is confused about what it’s defending. Without doubt, science is unique, powerful, and wonderful. It should be celebrated, and it needs to be protected. Scientism, on the other hand, is just metaphysics, and there are lots and lots of metaphysical beliefs. (para. 7) We further anticipate that scientism involves rigidity about what research topics are branded ‘acceptable’ vs. ‘heretical.’ The implication here being that some issues are offensive to orthodox sensibilities because they presumably (a) have no value in generating new scientific knowledge, or (b) undermine confidence in the evidence for current scientific thought. To clarify, orthodoxy is simply the majority view of present-day professional experts or what scientific institutions assert; it is not guaranteed to be faithful to Nature’s reality. In criticizing anything contrary to mainstream thinking, the belief is implicitly conveyed that the currently held majority view in science is always to be trusted and used as the basis for important actions. Explicitly, of course, even the most fervent science groupies will admit that scientific process is not infallible. But as everything unorthodox is denigrated and faulted, it is subliminally asserted that the reigning scientific views can always be trusted; thus, a conviction of certainty is expressed even when actual certainty is lacking (Bauer, 2014) and with apparently an overt deniability that this is being done deliberately.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Lamm, Ehud. "Review of: Julian Huxley, Evolution: The Modern Synthesis—The Definitive Edition, with a New Forward by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller. MIT Press, 2010." Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 45, no. 1 (December 14, 2010): 154–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9150-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Alters, Brian. "Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature of Science. By Massimo Pigliucci. Sunderland (Massachusetts): Sinauer Associates. $24.95 (paper). x + 338 p; ill.; name and subject indexes. ISBN: 0–87893–659–9. 2002." Quarterly Review of Biology 78, no. 2 (June 2003): 226–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/377962.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Futuyma, Douglas J. "Expand Or Revise? The Evolutionary Synthesis TodayEvolution: The Extended Synthesis. Edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press. $35.00. viii + 495 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-0-262-51367-8. 2010." Quarterly Review of Biology 86, no. 3 (September 2011): 203–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/661172.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Rollo, C. David. "Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes. Edited by Massimo Pigliucci and , Katherine Preston. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. $59.50. xv + 443 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–19–516043–6. 2004." Quarterly Review of Biology 80, no. 1 (March 2005): 112–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/431060.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Kirby, Jeremy. "Answers for Aristotle: How Science and Philosophy Can Lead Us to a More Meaningful Life. By Massimo Pigliucci. New York: Basic Books. $27.99. vi + 312 p.; index. ISBN: 978-0-465-02138-3 (hc); 978-0-465-03280-8 (eb). 2012." Quarterly Review of Biology 89, no. 3 (September 2014): 255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/677574.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Richards, Richard A. "Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. By Massimo Pigliucci. Chicago (Illinois): University of Chicago Press. $70.00 (hardcover); $20.00 (paper). v + 332 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-0-226-66785-0 (hc); 978-0-226-66786-7 (pb). 2010." Quarterly Review of Biology 86, no. 1 (March 2011): 36–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/658411.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Cleary, Skye C. "Massimo Pigliucci’s How to Be a Stoic." Philosophers' Magazine, no. 79 (2017): 114–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/tpm201779121.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Turner, Derek D. "Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry. Chicago (Illinois): University of Chicago Press. $35.00 (paper). viii + 469 p.; index. ISBN: 978-0-226-05179-6 (hc); 978-0-226-05196-3 (pb); 978-0-226-05182-6 (eb). 2013." Quarterly Review of Biology 89, no. 2 (June 2014): 161–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/676054.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!