Academic literature on the topic 'Phenomenology; Husserl; research'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Phenomenology; Husserl; research.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Phenomenology; Husserl; research"
1
Kozin, Sergey, and Oksana Medvedeva. "Criticism of E. Husserl's Naturalism and the Problem of the Lifeworld." Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences 2019, no. 3 (December 13, 2019): 264–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-264-270.
Full textAbstract:
The paper features the term "lifeworld" coined in 1910 by E. Husserl. The research objective was to describe the ideological content of Husserl's phenomenology, which determined the content and categorical design (type) of phenomenological sociology. E. Husserl introduced a systematic concept of the "lifeworld" and used it as a basis for a branch of social science now referred to as "understanding sociology". In addition, Husserl’s socio-philosophical and epistemological research helped to resolve the "crisis" of science, which he himself discovered, and to recreate the trampled dignity of human subjectivity. The research generalizes and clarifies various scientific views on the criticism of E. Husserl's naturalism and the problem of "lifeworld". Its results can be used in courses of sociology, philosophy, and history.
2
Sturzenegger, Karen Freme Duarte, Vera Fátima Dullius, and Clélia Peretti. "A contribuição da fenomenologia de Husserl para pesquisa em ciências humanas." Revista Eclesiástica Brasileira 79, no. 313 (September 20, 2019): 426. http://dx.doi.org/10.29386/reb.v79i313.1881.
Full textAbstract:
O artigo em questão trata da relevância da fenomenologia no século XIX e início do século XX no âmbito das ciências humanas. Apresenta o conceito fenomenológico em Husserl, aspectos da trajetória histórica da construção do método fenomenológico e sua contribuição para a pesquisa. O artigo discorre sobre o contexto da crise europeia no século XIX no que tange ao conceito de ciências e a contribuição da fenomenologia diante das visões positivista, racionalista e da psicologia. Apresenta, também aspectos teóricos da fenomenologia de Martin Heidegger, Edith Stein, Max Scheler e Merleau Ponty. O artigo faz menção a crítica de Husserl à ciência e introduz a questão da intencionalidade da consciência.Abstract: The article in question deals with the relevance of phenomenology in research in the humanities. It highlights the phenomenological concept in Husserl, aspects of the historical trajectory of concept construction, as well as its contribution to the research. To this end, the article discusses the context of the European crisis in the nineteenth century with regard to the concept of science, questions the positivist, rationalist and psychology views that have just emerged. Some aspects of important theorists that deal with the concept of phenomenology from the initial assumptions of phenomenology developed by Husserl are presented, such as: Martin Heidegger, Edith Stein, Max Scheler and Merleau Ponty. The article also announces Husserl’s critique of science; introduces the question of the intentionality of consciousness.Keywords: Phenomenology; Method; Humanities.
3
Berdaus, Svetlana. "THE CONCEPT OF KUNSTLEHRE IN THE HUSSERL’S PHENOMENOLOGY." Respublica literaria, RL. 2021. Vol. 2. No. 4 (November 29, 2021): 16–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.47850/rl.2021.2.4.16-26.
Full textAbstract:
The article proposes a reconstruction of the Kunstlehre concept, which occupies an important place in the structural and disciplinary section of Husserl's phenomenology. The key point of the presented reconstruction is its separation from the traditional interpretation of Kunstlehre criticized by Husserl and the advancement of a new project that coordinates three levels – theoretical, normative and practical. The theoretical level (pure logic), being complementary to the normative level (pure norms of reason), forms the basis of the disciplines represented by the program of science of knowledge (Wissenschaftslehre). The scientific study program falls on the period of the so- called logicism of Husserl, regarding which there is an opinion in the research literature that it was interrupted by the founder of phenomenology immediately after the writing of the first volume of “Logical Investigations”. However, on the basis of textual arguments, we show that this program was extended by Husserl up to his last works. The nature of this expansion is related to the practical level of Kunstlehre (transcendental phenomenology). The main task of this level was to provide science and scientists with noetic conditions, i.e. skills of transcendental criticism of consciousness. It is suggested that the presented reconstruction of Kunstlehre shows the permanent development of the program of logicism by Husserl, and also demonstrates the connection of this program with transcendental phenomenology.
4
Molotokienė, Ernesta. "AR HETEROFENOMENOLOGIJA ĮVEIKIA AUTOFENOMENOLOGIJĄ?" Problemos 77 (January 1, 2010): 70–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/problemos.2010.0.1900.
Full textAbstract:
Straipsnyje aptariamas Danielio C. Dennetto pasiūlytas heterofenomenologijos metodas, pretenduojantis sąmonės patirtis tirti iš trečiojo asmens perspektyvos, ir analizuojamas argumentų už šio metodo pranašumą autofenonomenologijos, arba Edmundo Husserlio fenomenologijoje taikomo introspekcijos metodo iš pirmojo asmens perspektyvos atžvilgiu, korektiškumas. Dennettas, įvesdamas trečio asmens perspektyvą, heterofenomenologijos metodui siekia suteikti gamtos mokslų metodams būdingo objektyvumo, kurio nepavyko pasiekti Husserlio autofenomenologijos projektui dėl neišvengiamo subjektyvumo veiksnio. Todėl Dennettas subjektų pranešimams apie sąmonės patirtis suteikia įsitikinimų statusą, kurį legitimuoja jau ne pats subjektas, o stebėtojas (heterofenomenologas), šitaip atlikdamas mokslinį subjektų įsitikinimų apie sąmonės patirtis tyrimą. Bet ar subjektų pranešti įsitikinimai gali būti neutralūs, be subjektyvios interpretacijos apvalkalo, kaip to tikisi Dennettas? Straipsnyje tvirtinama, kad ambicingas Dennetto heterofenomenologijos metodas neišvengia Husserlio fenomenologijai būdingo subjektyvumo, nes Dennettas nekorektiškai interpretuoja Husserlį, iškreipdamas, bet neišvengdamas autofenomenologijai priskiriamų trūkumų.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: heterofenomenologija, autofenomenologija, sąmonė, metodas, intencionalumas, patyrimas.Does Heterophenomenology Surmount Autophenomenology?Ernesta Molotokienė SummaryDaniel C. Dennett’s heterophenomenological method for analyzing the experiences of one’s consciousness using the third person approach, as well as an analysis of the argument correctness of its superiority over the autophenomenology or introspective method of the first person approach applied in Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology are presented. By introducing the third person perpective, Dennett seeks to bestow the impartiality which is typical of the nature sciences, to heterophenomenological method. The Husserl autophenomenology project had failed in this field because of its inevitable subjectivity. Therefore, Dennett provides the subject’s messages about experiences of consciousness with the conviction status, which is legitimated not by the subject but by the observer (the heterophenomenologist), and in this way he carries out the scientific research of the subject’s convictions about the experiences of consciousness. But can the subject’s convictions be neutral, without a shell of subjective interpretation, as Dennett expects them to be? The article argues that the ambitious heterophenomenologic method of Dennett is unable to avoid the subjectivity typical of Husserl’s phenomenology, because Dennett interprets Husserl incorrectly by twisting his ideas, but is unable to elude the drawbacks of autophenomenology.Keywords: heterophenomenology, autophenomenology, consciousness, method, intentionality, experience.
5
Mendicino, Kristina. "Fictions of Phenomenology: Husserl and Musil." Scientia Poetica 23, no. 1 (October 21, 2019): 302–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/scipo-2019-025.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Despite the express intentions of his phenomenological investigations, the radical significance of Edmund Husserl’s discussions of signs and meaning may reside in their exposure of the ways in which language remains structurally alien to the field of subjectivity and cognition. If this would mean that a phenomenological theory of cognition could not guide the study of literary language, however, fiction may nonetheless turn out to be one of the most important sources for phenomenological »Erkenntnis«, albeit in a different way than Husserl could have meant in his famous affirmation of fiction in phenomenological research: as the exposure of its limits, and as the further explication of a field where, as Jacques Derrida would write, »every present subject can be absent.« This possibility is explored in the present contribution through an analysis of Robert Musil’s Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften.
6
Himanka, Juha. "Husserl's two truths: Adequate and apodictic evidence." Phänomenologische Forschungen 2005, no. 1 (2005): 93–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.28937/1000107913.
Full textAbstract:
Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations was the breakthrough of phenomenology. What made it a breakthrough was the new way of explicating truth or evidence as self-givenness or adequacy. Husserl did however also have another interpretation of truth: evidence as indubitability or certainty of apodicticity. Originally Husserl thought that apodicticity increases the evidence of something already adequately given. Yet, in the first Cartesian Meditation Husserl differentiates the two modes of evidence. In this article the way to this split up of evidence is elaborated with the help of some recent publications in Husserliana. It is also suggested that the fact that Husserl has two separate views on truth is one reason for the dispersed state of Husserl- research. This article argues that Husserl’s early view on evidence adequacy is more original and interesting. The real philosophical challenge, however, is to be able to join the two modes of evidence under one strenge Wissenschaft.
7
Varga, Peter Andras. "Die Einflüsse der Brentano’schen Intentionalitätskonzeptionen auf den frühen Husserl." Phänomenologische Forschungen 2014, no. 1 (2014): 83–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.28937/1000107778.
Full textAbstract:
Both the current research literature and a tradition stemming from Husserl himself agree that it was Brentano’s notion of intentionality which „gave rise“ to Husserl’s phenomenology. I rely on extensive primary materials, including unpublished sources from four archives, to revisit this thesis. Already a survey of the historical circumstances of Brentano’s second decade in Vienna, when Husserl studied under him, hints at possible discrepancies in the reception of Brentano’s thought, which are further deepened by the editing policy employed by his orthodox students. I analyze an unpublished lecture manuscript of Brentano to find three different notions of intentionality, including a strikingly a-phenomenological one, which I then relate to the discussion by modern scholarship and try to identify those notions of intentionality which were encountered by Husserl as a student of Brentano. Given this heterogeneous matrix of influences, it is far from surprising that a closer look at Husserl’s philosophical juvenilia shows that he misunderstood Brentano’s notion of intentionality and attempted to employ it in a different theoretical context (maybe motivated by an idiosyncratic notion of inner perception). Finally, the notion of intentionality Husserl later attributed to Brentano was probably mitigated to him by indirect sources, including lecture manuscripts copied by the extravagant and less-know student of Brentano, Hans Schmidkunz, and a debate between a contemporary logician Christoph Sigwart and Brentano’s orthodox disciples. The analysis of these transmission mechanisms could reveal a distinct transformation which proved to be instrumental in the development of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology. The allegedly decisive influence of Brentano’s notion of intentionality at Husserl thus seems to consist in a productive misunderstanding (which apparently corresponds to Brentano’s surprisingly dismissive evaluation of Husserl after Husserl’s departure from Vienna).
8
KRAMER, CHRIS A. "As If: Connecting Phenomenology, Mirror Neurons, Empathy, and Laughter." PhaenEx 7, no. 1 (May 26, 2012): 275–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/p.v7i1.3301.
Full textAbstract:
The discovery of mirror neurons in both primates and humans has led to an enormous amount of research and speculation as to how conscious beings are able to interact so effortlessly among one another. Mirror neurons might provide an embodied basis for passive synthesis and the eventual process of further communalization through empathy, as envisioned by Edmund Husserl. I consider the possibility of a phenomenological and scientific investigation of laughter as a point of connection that might in the future bridge the gap Husserl feared had grown too expansive between the worlds of science and philosophy. Part I will describe some implications of the discovery of mirror neurons. Part II will address Husserl’s concept of embodiment as it relates to neuroscience and empathy. Part III will be a primer to investigating laughter phenomenologically. Part IV will be a continuation of the study of laughter and empathy as possible elements helpful in broadening the scope of what Husserl calls the Life-World.
9
Timoshchuk, E. A. "PETER BERGER AND HIS SOCIOCULTURAL-PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH." Intelligence. Innovations. Investment, no. 5 (2020): 146–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2020-5-146.
Full textAbstract:
The phenomenological paradigm in sociocultural research is the relay race of Husserl — Schütz — Luckmann and Berger. Despite the first difference between sociology and phenomenology, the emphasis on design, biography, historical context, subjectivity and experience only complement quantitative research with the necessary quality of humanism. Today, when technocratic line is becoming a leading trend, when people talk about neuro-turnaround in science and social practices, phenomenology must be given credit for its courage in sociocultural subjectivity and the actualization of the philosophy of consciousness. Scientometric absorption of the subject is a dangerous way of deflation of philosophy, its reduction to the functional support of the brain-machine interface. The sociocultural phenomenologist Peter Berger (1929–2017) died a year after the demise of his and co-author Thomas Luckmann. Last year there was also jubilee of the founder of phenomenology, Edmund Husserl, who turned 160 years old. The scientometric absorption of the subject is a dangerous way of deflation of philosophy, its reduction to the functional support of the brain-machine interface. The study of the heritage of P. Berger in this regard allows us to proceed to the efficient processing of Husserl’s ideas in the field of describing the valuesemantic world of society and culture. The author proceeds with the study of the model of the socio-cultural and anthropological world, constructed by Peter Ludwig Berger. The subject of the research is the theoretical framework of the phenomenology of society and culture. The main provisions of Berger’s sociocultural phenomenology are: 1) secularization has a heterogeneous porous structure, 2) under capitalism, transcendence is possible as a personal spiritual practice; 3) pluralism of social orders and globalization are the basis for restrained forecasts regarding the society of the future; 4) the clash of bureaucracy and the private is removed by the daily routine of meaning generation. Pursuing issues of the privatization of religion, the theory of modernization, the sociology of knowledge, Berger’s sociocultural phenomenology turns everyday life into a fascinating scientific quest. He easily moves from concrete to abstract and vice versa, but does not throw the reader into the abyss of lifeless ideas. At the same time, the sociologist makes it clear that he is ready to change his mind, he does not close us in a rigid configuration of ideas, yet places the reader in the bootstrap reality. Berger remained in phenomenological position, describing social structures in terms of construction, typification, collective understanding, legitimization of social memory, horizons of reality, habitualization of meanings, reification of meanings, objectification of the lifeworld of utopias. Main conclusions. The sociocultural phenomenology of P. Berger allows you to value-correlate the sacrifices made by capitalism and communism to build a social order. His phenomenology is the method of contextual correlation of different social worlds — science and religion, secular and transcendental, personal and collective. Bergerian sociocultural subjectivism opposes the reduction of philosophy to the information support of a technogenic society and the maintenance of science.
10
Ortega Rodríguez, Iván. "La crítica de Patocka a Husserl: subjetividad trascendental frente al mundo como trascendental." Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, no. 5 (February 12, 2021): 255. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/rif.5.2015.29820.
Full textAbstract:
Jan Patočka (1907-1977) desarrolló un original trabajo fenomenológico pese a circunstancias adversas. En él, pasó de defender unas tesis muy cercanas a Ideas I a sostener unos planteamientos notablemente alejados. Para el filósofo checo, Husserl habría localizado la esfera trascendental pero habría errado al tomarla por un ente o preente subjetivo. Por el contrario, una aplicación consecuente hasta el final de la epojé nos permite ir hasta la auténtica esfera trascendental, que es el mundo como proto-estructura universal de aparición. En consecuencia, Patočka diverge muy notablemente de Husserl al tiempo que mantiene la propuesta de una fenomenología trascendental (aunque “a-subjetiva”). Asimismo, esta noción de la esfera trascendental permite profundizar la crítica a Husserl, pues su subjetivismo vendría dado por haber confundido la realización concreta del aparecer en cada sujeto concreto con la esfera pura del aparecer. Husserl no habría sido, a ojos de Patočka, lo suficientemente trascendental.Jan Patočka developed an original phenomenological research in spite of adverse circumstances. He underwent a profound evolution. If at first his theses were very close to Husserl’s Ideas, at the end of his life his position was notably different of his master’s. For the Czech philosopher, Husserl was right to speak about a transcendental sphere but was wrong to take it as an entity or pre-entity of subjective nature. On the contrary, a consequent use of epokhe enables us to get to the true transcendental sphere. This sphere is the “world” as the universal structure of appearing as such. Consequently, Patočka diverges from Husserl but he keeps the idea of a transcendental phenomenology (though “a-subjective”). Furthermore, Patočka thinks that Husserl mistook the realisation of appearing in each particular subject with the pure sphere of appearance. According to Patočka, then, Husserl’s Phenomenology would not have been transcendental enough.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Phenomenology; Husserl; research"
1
Tufanaru, Catalin. "The quality of Husserlian phenomenological research in the health sciences: a methodological review." Thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2440/84692.
Full textAbstract:
The objective of this Thesis was to provide a narrative synthesis of the literature on the quality of existing Husserlian phenomenological research studies in the health sciences. A methodological systematic review was performed. Only studies that focus on adult patients’ experiences of preventive, screening, diagnosis, treatment or rehabilitation interventions/procedures were considered to serve as a paradigm ‘case’ of the use of the Husserlian phenomenological approach within the broad field of health. The review question was: What is the quality of existing Husserlian phenomenological research studies in the health sciences? For this review, quality refers to the extent to which there is congruence between the Husserlian phenomenological approach and the content of Husserlian phenomenological research studies. This review considered studies that included adults (aged 18 years old or older), regardless of gender or ethnicity, cognitive abilities or impairments/dysfunctions, principal diagnosis and co-morbidities, severity or stage of the disease or co-morbidities, who had received preventive, screening, diagnostic, treatment or rehabilitation interventions regardless of healthcare setting and type and specifics of interventions/procedures. Only studies with the experiences from the patient’s perspective were considered for inclusion in the review. Qualitative research studies grounded in the work of Husserl, including studies that utilise the Giorgi’s or Colaizzi’s approach (or any similar phenomenological descriptive approach) were considered for inclusion in the review. The search was limited to English language publications from January 1960 to September 2012. A three-step search strategy was utilised in this review, an initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL, followed by a second search using all identified keywords and index terms undertaken across databases, and a third search of reference list of all identified articles. Papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using a standardised critical appraisal instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were extracted from papers included in the review using a standardised data extraction tool from Joanna Briggs Institute. Methodological critique of the included studies was performed during the data synthesis stage of the review. The purpose of the methodological critique of included studies was the examination of their congruence with the central tenets of Husserlian phenomenological approach. Given the objective of the systematic review no studies were excluded after critical appraisal. Thirty studies were included.
The review of the included papers identified clear inconsistencies between the tenets of Husserlian philosophical phenomenology and the research approaches used in included studies but the creative adaptation and transformation of phenomenological ideas and approaches for the specific purposes of qualitative scientific research are justified and the results of the research are useful if the circumstances and consequences of these adaptations and transformations are understood. Deficiencies found in included studies were examined with the intention to clarify the conditions for better application of the phenomenological method. Recommendations are provided for future health research motivated by this specific philosophical perspective.Thesis (M.Clin.Sc.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Translational Health Science, 2013
2
蔣玉華. "Tracing the Source of "Qualitative Research": The changes of Husserl''s Phenomenology in the Application of the Social Sciences." Thesis, 1998. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/37126582556491285062.
Full text
3
Chang, Yu-Hen, and 張郁涵. "Research of Zhuangzi's "The equality of Things" and Edumund Husserl's "Phenomenology"." Thesis, 2010. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/70590670517264392945.
Full text
4
Chiu, Chien-Yi, and 邱健一. "Intuition、Image consciousness and the image appearance - the Research of the Relationship between Husserl's Phenomenology and Chinese Painting Creation." Thesis, 2010. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/j4989n.
Full textAbstract:
碩士國立臺中教育大學
美術學系碩士班
99
The research follows the thought of Husserl's phenomenology to conduct the ink painting creation for the purpose of accomplishing the pure vision of a kind of “return to pure vision” for intuition is just such the way to observe objects. By intuition directly grasp the object the moment show as it is the presence, such experience is “of directly grasping in the original” speciality and makes creation become thing itself been given experience (erlebnis). And evidence also provides consciousness’ unimpeachable descriptive features and is given at the same time with experience (erlebnis) itself. Such observation way does not care about the authenticity of the external things but it should be sure there ought to appear some similar features with the feeling content. In the creation process, field painting is the most appropriate creation mode. Dry lotuses being creative theme for sketching skills do not deviate from principles of phenomenology’ “itself is given” and “directly presentation” but only apply ink painting’s basic medium to maximally play. The works’ content initially describe faithfully sensing materials that map from thing itself, but the sensing object turns from things objects to experience object, which along with the way been given turns from projection (chattung) to reflextion. The series of creation pictures show the initial portrayal to later enjoyable whim, which is the writer applies learning phenomenology to ink painting creating experiment and also is a historic record ranges from external visual to intrinsic understanding.
Books on the topic "Phenomenology; Husserl; research"
1
Ploder, Andrea. Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft?: Zur Rezeption der Phänomenologie Husserls in der Methodenliteratur. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, 2014.
Find full text
2
Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. Phenomenology World-Wide: Foundations - Expanding Dynamics - Life-Engagements - A Guide for Research and Study. Springer, 2011.
Find full text
3
Anna-Teresa, Tymieniecka, ed. Phenomenology world-wide: Foundations, expanding dynamisms, life-engagements : a guide for research and study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
Find full text
4
Kontos, Pavlos. Aristotle in Phenomenology. Edited by Dan Zahavi. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755340.013.2.
Full textAbstract:
It is not an overstatement to say that no other figure in the history of philosophy has exercised a stronger influence on phenomenology than Aristotle. It suffices to recall Franz Brentano’s decisive role in the genesis of phenomenology or to enumerate the Aristotelian concepts and patterns of thought that phenomenological research—from Husserl to its contemporary practitioners—has appropriated or assimilated. But the most critical element of that influence is the fact that Aristotle has served as the privileged pivot for phenomenology’s own development. The present chapter presents a brief overview of phenomenological approaches to Aristotle and focuses on two episodes in that long story, namely, on Heidegger’s and Gadamer’s interpretations of Aristotle’s practical philosophy and how they contributed to the elaboration of their conceptions of phenomenology.
5
Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twentieth Century Analecta Husserliana The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research. Springer, 2009.
Find full text
6
Brinkmann, Svend. German Philosophies of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190247249.003.0004.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter presents the phenomenological and hermeneutic philosophies that have been immensely relevant for qualitative research. Phenomenology began with Husserl and was continued by Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, and it was developed into tools for qualitative inquiry by scholars such as Giorgi. Hermeneutics dates back to Scheiermacher and Dilthey, and it was in a sense merged with phenomenology by Heidegger and brought up to date by Gadamer in particular. Many qualitative methodologies employ strategies from phenomenology and hermeneutics, which can be condensed to the essential idea of making the obvious obvious. The difference between phenomenology and hermeneutics in their purer forms concerns the extent to which they view interpretation (rather than description) as a necessary component in making that which is implicit in an “obvious” way explicit.
7
Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. Turning Points of the New Phenomenological Era: Husserl Research -- Drawing upon the Full Extent of His Development Book 1 Phenomenology in the World Fifty Years after the Death of Edmund Husserl. Springer London, Limited, 2012.
Find full text
8
Jansen, Julia. Imagination De-Naturalized. Edited by Dan Zahavi. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755340.013.33.
Full textAbstract:
Many of the common assumptions regarding the role imagination plays in phenomenology reflect misunderstandings regarding the nature of phenomenological research. This chapter starts by clarifying some of these misunderstandings. It then presents Husserl’s groundbreaking investigations and considers the most important contribution he made to phenomenological research on the imagination: his “de-naturalization” of the imagination. The chapter then details some of the ways in which Sartre and Merleau-Ponty depart from Husserl’s approach. It gives an account of how both build upon Husserl’s earlier work and also reject some of its tenets. Able here to present only a few facets of the rich history of phenomenological treatments of the imagination, the chapter singles out Sartre and Merleau-Ponty as the two most well-known contributors after Husserl. Both significantly advanced phenomenological research on the imagination and widened its role. Their new impulses changed the trajectory of that history and aided its diversification.
9
Janik, Piotr, and Carla Canullo, eds. Intentionnalité Comme Idée: Phenomenon, Between Efficacy and Analogy. Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12797/9788381385978.
Full textAbstract:
The texts collected in this volume are the result of research in the field of the pressing issues of phenomenology as a “formal,” i.e., genetic-constitutional, investigation of the sense in the scientific and philosophical dialogue to which it aspires from the beginning with Edmund Husserl. The hope of the editors is to offer the reader a textbook of quality and relevance, and perhaps a particular input to challenge and find what is given by revealing itself and/or oneself. The range of topics is very wide [...]. The choice of topics itself is extremely interesting; it makes phenomenology, broadly conceived, and its tradition, as well as its present day, a lively and passionate subject. Piotr Mróz
10
Powell, Thomas C. William James (1842–1910). Edited by Jenny Helin, Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth, and Robin Holt. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0011.
Full textAbstract:
William James (1842–1910) contributed groundbreaking ideas to empirical philosophy, metaphysics, and psychology, and influenced some of the greatest minds of the twentieth century, including Edmund Husserl, Alfred North Whitehead, and Ludwig Wittgenstein. This chapter explores James’s contributions to management studies. Focusing on James’s first major work, Principles of Psychology (1890), the chapter traces his influence on three major streams of social research––process philosophy, phenomenology, and functionalism––and follows these streams as they flowed into research on organizations and management. James believed that experience could not be forced into static systems or grand unified theories, but was ‘a snowflake caught in the warm hand’. For social scientists, his work shows the virtues of embracing human experience in all its pluralism, and reawakening the mind to forgotten potentialities.
Book chapters on the topic "Phenomenology; Husserl; research"
1
Ferri, Michela Beatrice. "The History of the Husserl Archives Established in Memory of Alfred Schutz at the New School for Social Research." In Contributions To Phenomenology, 227–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99185-6_13.
Full text
2
Nenon, Thomas. "Intersubjectivity, Interculturality, and Realities in Husserl’s Research Manuscripts on the Life-World (Hua XXXIX)." In Contributions to Phenomenology, 143–63. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01616-0_8.
Full text
3
Hayes, Catherine, and Yitka N. H. Graham. "Phenomenology." In Conceptual Analyses of Curriculum Inquiry Methodologies, 28–50. IGI Global, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8848-2.ch002.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter provides an insight into the origins and traditions of phenomenology as both philosophy and methodology. Emphasis is placed in the earlier parts of the chapter on the delineation between Husserl and Heidegger, the forefathers of the discipline, whose work into epistemology and ontology have fundamentally shaped contemporary qualitative research. Understanding the key concepts of epoché and the implications of the ‘self' within phenomenological research are explicated so that the reader can consider the practicalities of whether it is possible to suspend presupposition and epistemic bias, or whether the ‘self' is something that has simply to be acknowledged as having a fundamental relevance to what and how interpretation is undertaken and how this has a consequent and tangible impact on research findings. The latter part of the chapter gives an insight into interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) as one contemporary approach to the integration of phenomenological research methods.
4
Uemura, Genki. "Phenomenology in Japan." In The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenologies and Organization Studies, 555–72. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192865755.013.30.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This chapter outlines the development of Japanese phenomenology from its beginning to early in the 21st century. Section 28.2 focuses on the initial phase of its reception in Japan in the 1910s. A remarkable feature common in discussions of this period is that Japanese philosophers interpreted Husserl with reference to Neo-Kantianism. This perspective would persist in the reception of phenomenology in Japan into the 1920s, on which Section 28.3 focuses. This period is striking because, for one thing, Heidegger’s hermeneutical phenomenology had an impact even before the publication of his Being and Time in 1927. Even more importantly, it was in this same period that researchers from applied areas began to show an interest in phenomenology. Section 28.4 deals with how phenomenology in prewar Japan came into full maturity between the latter half of the 1920s and the middle 1930s. This section will argue that phenomenological research in applied areas also reached a high point in this phase of its maturation. Section 28.5 touches on selected episodes of phenomenology in postwar Japan, emphasizing discussions over its application.
5
Nguyen, Chau H. P., and Howard J. Curzer. "Husserlian-Oriented Descriptive Phenomenological Research Methodology." In Methodological Innovations in Research and Academic Writing, 63–81. IGI Global, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8283-1.ch004.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter aims to extend the current body of knowledge about phenomenological research methodologies. By focusing exclusively on the Husserlian-oriented descriptive phenomenological methodology, (1) the authors will first provide a brief introduction to Husserl's phenomenology. (2) They will then give a thorough delineation of Giorgi's descriptive phenomenological psychological methodology, which is underpinned by Husserl's phenomenological philosophy. They will subsequently describe in detail methods of data gathering and the method of data analysis of this phenomenological methodology. (3) Finally, they will borrow raw data from published empirical research to demonstrate the application of this data analysis method.
6
"Present-day phenomenology in Husserl’s self-interpretation." In Introduction to Phenomenological Research, 32–78. Indiana University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt1sgpb.6.
Full text
7
Clinton, Esther, and Jeremy Wallach. "Facing the Musical Other." In The Oxford Handbook of the Phenomenology of Music Cultures, C5.P1—C5.N23. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190693879.013.5.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The philosopher Alfred Schutz labored to unite Max Weber’s sociology with Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology, while Emmanuel Levinas theorized the ethics of encounter with another consciousness. Similar in background and age—both were European Jews whose work in the mid-twentieth century was fundamentally shaped by World War II—these thinkers are rarely considered together because they represent different traditions within phenomenology. In this chapter, we argue that their writings on ethical social relations, if drawn upon purposefully and strategically, can illuminate the ethnographic investigation of musical experience. Taking Indonesian dangdut music as our case study, we demonstrate the utility of a Levinasian-Schutzian approach for understanding the social dimensions of musicking and addressing the ethical ramifications of ethnographic research.
8
"Descartes’ inquiry into res cogitans’ being-certain and the lack of specification of the character of being of consciousness as the thematic field of Husserl’s phenomenology." In Introduction to Phenomenological Research, 196–207. Indiana University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt1sgpb.14.
Full text
9
"Husserl’s more primordial neglect of the question of being, opposite the thematic field of phenomenology, and the task of seeing and explicating existence in its being." In Introduction to Phenomenological Research, 208–22. Indiana University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt1sgpb.15.
Full text