Relevant bibliographies by topics / Phased array coils / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Phased array coils'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Phased array coils.
Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 28 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Phased array coils.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Ying, Leslie, and Zhi-Pei Liang. "Parallel MRI Using Phased Array Coils." IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 27, no. 4 (July 2010): 90–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/msp.2010.936731.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gareis, Daniel, Tobias Wichmann, Titus Lanz, Gerd Melkus, Michael Horn, and Peter M. Jakob. "Mouse MRI using phased-array coils." NMR in Biomedicine 20, no. 3 (2007): 326–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1156.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Monroe, James W., Petra Schmalbrock, and Dimitrios G. Spigos. "Phased Array Coils for Upper Extremity MRA." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 33, no. 2 (February 1995): 224–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910330212.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

De Marchi, Daniele, Alessandra Flori, Nicola Martini, and Giulio Giovannetti. "Artifacts by Misalignment of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phased-array Coil Elements: From Simulation to In vivo Test." Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews 15, no. 3 (February 25, 2019): 301–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405613666171024150250.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance evaluations generally require a radiofrequency coil setup comprising a transmit whole-body coil and a receive coil. In particular, radiofrequency phased-array coils are employed to pick up the signals emitted by the nuclei with high signal-tonoise ratio and a large region of sensitivity. Methods: Literature discussed different technical issues on how to minimize interactions between array elements and how to combine data from such elements to yield optimum Signal-to-Noise Ratio images. However, image quality strongly depends upon the correct coil position over the heart and of one array coil portion with respect to the other. Results: In particular, simple errors in coil positioning could cause artifacts carrying to an inaccurate interpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance images. Conclusion: This paper describes the effect of array elements misalignment, starting from coil simulation to cardiac magnetic resonance acquisitions with a 1.5 T scanner. </P><P> Phased-array coil simulation was performed using the magnetostatic approach; moreover, phantom and in vivo experiments with a commercial 8-elements cardiac phased-array receiver coil permitted to estimate signal-to-noise ratio and B1 mapping for aligned and shifted coil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hricak, H., S. White, D. Vigneron, J. Kurhanewicz, A. Kosco, D. Levin, J. Weiss, P. Narayan, and P. R. Carroll. "Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal--pelvic phased-array coils." Radiology 193, no. 3 (December 1994): 703–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972810.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hatabu, Hiroto, Warren B. Gefter, John Listerud, Eric A. Hoffman, Leon Axel, Joseph C. McGowan, Harold I. Palevsky, Cecil E. Hayes, Junji Konishi, and Herbert Y. Kressel. "Pulmonary MR Angiography Utilizing Phased-Array Surface Coils." Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 16, no. 3 (May 1992): 410–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199205000-00012.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Damen, Frederick C., and Kejia Cai. "B1− non-uniformity correction of phased-array coils without measuring coil sensitivity." Magnetic Resonance Imaging 51 (September 2018): 20–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2018.04.009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Sun, Qi, Min-jun Dong, Xiao-feng Tao, Meng-da Jiang, and Chi Yang. "Selection and application of coils in temporomandibular joint MRI." Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 49, no. 3 (March 2020): 20190002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190002.

Full text
Abstract:
Objective: To compare and evaluate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values between a 15-channel phased array head coil and 6-channel dS Flex M surface coil in the MRI of temporomandibular joint. Methods: 300 patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 150 patients were examined by using a 15-channel phased array head coil and the other 150 patients were scanned by using a 6-channel dS Flex M surface coil. All of the data were set in the same 6 regions of interest including the temporal lobe, condyle neck, lateral pterygoid muscle, parotid gland, the adipose area and an area of the background noise）. SNR and CNR values were measured respectively. Results: The numerical variation law of SNR and CNR values measured in regionsof interest of each group was similar, although different coils were used. There were statistically significant differences of SNR values in all of the oblique sagittal (OSag) proton density-weighted imaging, the part of OSag T 2 weighted image (T 2WI) except for SNR4 and SNR5. and oblique coronal (OCor) T 2WI sequence except for SNR2. On the contrary, SNR4 and SNR5 values in the OCor T 2WI and SNR5 values in OSag T 2WI sequences by using the surface coil were higher than those by using the head coil. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences of CNR values in OSag proton density-weighted imaging sequence except CNR1 and in OSag T 2WI sequence except CNR5. But, statistically significant differences of all the values in the OCor T 2WI sequence except for CNR1 were observed. Conclusion: Both the phased array head coil and dS Flex M surface coil can be used for temporomandibular joint MRI.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Fütterer, Jurgen J., Marc R. Engelbrecht, Gerrit J. Jager, Robert P. Hartman, Bernard F. King, Christina A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, J. Alfred Witjes, and Jelle O. Barentsz. "Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal–pelvic phased-array coils." European Radiology 17, no. 4 (October 6, 2006): 1055–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0418-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Beck, Michael J., Dennis L. Parker, and J. Rock Hadley. "Capacitive versus Overlap Decoupling of Adjacent Radio Frequency Phased Array Coil Elements: An Imaging Robustness Comparison When Sample Load Varies for 3 Tesla MRI." Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B, Magnetic Resonance Engineering 2020 (December 15, 2020): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8828047.

Full text
Abstract:
Phased array (PA) receive coils are built such that coil elements approximate independent antenna behavior. One method of achieving this goal is to use an available decoupling method to decouple adjacent coil elements. The purpose of this work was to compare the relative performance of two decoupling methods as a function of variation in sample load. Two PA receive coils with 5 channels (5-ch) each, equal outer dimensions, and formed on 12 cm diameter cylindrical phantoms of conductivities 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 S/m were evaluated for relative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and parallel imaging performance. They were only tuned and matched to the 0.6 S/m phantom. Simulated and measured axial, sagittal, and coronal 5-ch PA coil SNR ratios were compared by dividing the overlap by the capacitive decoupled coil SNR results. Issues related to the selection of capacitor values for the two decoupling methods were evaluated by taking the ratio of the match and tune capacitors for large and small 2 channel (2-ch) PA coils. The SNR ratios showed that the SNR of the two decoupling methods were very similar. The inverse geometry-factor maps showed similar but better overall parallel imaging performance for the capacitive decoupled method. The quotients for the 2-ch PA coils’ maximum and minimum capacitor value ratios are 3.28 and 1.38 for the large and 3.28 and 2.22 for the small PA. The results of this paper demonstrate that as the sample load varies, the capacitive and overlap decoupling methods are very similar in relative SNR and this similarity continues for parallel imaging performance. Although, for the 5-ch coils studied, the capacitive decoupling method has a slight SNR and parallel imaging advantage and it was noted that the capacitive decoupled coil is more likely to encounter unbuildable PA coil configurations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Nagarajan, Rajakumar, Daniel JA Margolis, Steven S. Raman, David Ouellette, Manoj K. Sarma, Robert E. Reiter, and M. Albert Thomas. "Mr Spectroscopic Imaging of Peripheral Zone in Prostate Cancer Using a 3t Mri Scanner: Endorectal versus External Phased Array Coils." Magnetic Resonance Insights 6 (January 2013): MRI.S10861. http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/mri.s10861.

Full text
Abstract:
Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) detects alterations in major prostate metabolites, such as citrate (Cit), creatine (Cr), and choline (Ch). We evaluated the sensitivity and accuracy of three-dimensional MRSI of prostate using an endorectal compared to an external phased array “receive” coil on a 3T MRI scanner. Eighteen patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent endorectal MR imaging and proton (1H) MRSI were included in this study. Immediately after the endorectal MRSI scan, the PCa patients were scanned with the external phased array coil. The endorectal coil-detected metabolite ratio [(Ch+Cr)/Cit] was significantly higher in cancer locations (1.667 ± 0.663) compared to non-cancer locations (0.978 ± 0.420) ( P < 0.001). Similarly, for the external phased array, the ratio was significantly higher in cancer locations (1.070 ± 0.525) compared to non-cancer locations (0.521 ± 0.310) ( P < 0.001). The sensitivity and accuracy of cancer detection were 81% and 78% using the endorectal ‘receive’ coil, and 69% and 75%, respectively using the external phased array ‘receive’ coil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Goo, Eun-Hoe, Hyong-Hu Park, In-Chul Im, and Jae-Seung Lee. "Development of animal-dedicated phased-array coils for rat images." Journal of the Korean Physical Society 61, no. 5 (September 2012): 815–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.815.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Rodríguez, Alfredo O., and Lucía Medina. "Improved SNR of phased-array PERES coils via simulation study." Physics in Medicine and Biology 50, no. 18 (August 31, 2005): N215—N225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/18/n01.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Hartwig, V., G. Vivoli, S. Tassano, A. Carrozzi, and G. Giovannetti. "Decoupling and shielding numerical optimization of MRI phased-array coils." Measurement 82 (March 2016): 450–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.01.021.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Noeske, Ralph, Frank Seifert, Karl-Heinz Rhein, and Herbert Rinneberg. "Human cardiac imaging at 3 T using phased array coils." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44, no. 6 (2000): 978–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<978::aid-mrm22>3.0.co;2-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

King, Scott B., Steve M. Varosi, and G. Randy Duensing. "Eigenmode analysis for understanding phased array coils and their limits." Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering 29B, no. 1 (2006): 42–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.20054.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Mareyam, Azma, Erik Shank, Lawrence L. Wald, Michael K. Qin, and Giorgio Bonmassar. "A New Phased-Array Magnetic Resonance Imaging Receive-Only Coil for HBO2 Studies." Sensors 22, no. 16 (August 14, 2022): 6076. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22166076.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper describes a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phased-array receive-only (Rx) coil for studying decompression sickness and disorders of hyperbaricity, including nitrogen narcosis. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is noninvasive, is considered safe, and may allow studying the brain under hyperbaric conditions. All of the risks associated with simultaneous MRI and HBO2 therapy are described in detail, along with all of the mitigation strategies and regulatory testing. One of the most significant risks for this type of study is a fire in the hyperbaric chamber caused by the sparking of the MRI coils as a result of high-voltage RF arcs. RF pulses at 128 MHz elicit signals from human tissues, and RF sparking occurs commonly and is considered safe in normobaric conditions. We describe how we built a coil for HBO2-MRI studies by modifying an eight-channel phased-array MRI coil with all of the mitigation strategies discussed. The coil was fabricated and tested with a unique testing platform that simulated the worst-case RF field of a three-Tesla MRI in a Hyperlite hyperbaric chamber at 3 atm pressure. The coil was also tested in normobaric conditions for image quality in a 3 T scanner in volunteers and SNR measurement in phantoms. Further studies are necessary to characterize the coil safety in HBO2/MRI.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Blomqvist, L., A. von Rosen, and T. Hindmarsh. "MR Imaging of Adult Colo-Rectal Intussusception." Acta Radiologica 36, no. 4-6 (July 1995): 656–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/028418519503600469.

Full text
Abstract:
MR imaging of an intussuscepted sigmoid cancer misinterpreted as a rectal carcinoma is described. High-resolution technique with pelvic-phased array coils and fast spin-echo was used. The diagnosis is discussed in relation to the MR findings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Foo, T. K., J. R. MacFall, C. E. Hayes, H. D. Sostman, and B. E. Slayman. "Pulmonary vasculature: single breath-hold MR imaging with phased-array coils." Radiology 183, no. 2 (May 1992): 473–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.183.2.1561352.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Fujita, H. "Moment method analysis of mutual interaction in MRI phased array coils." Magnetic Resonance Materials in Biology, Physics, and Medicine 10, no. 2 (June 2000): 84–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-8661(00)00072-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Xu, Wen-Long, Ju-Cheng Zhang, Xia Li, Bing-Qiao Xu, and Gui-Sheng Tao. "Designing shielded radio-frequency phased-array coils for magnetic resonance imaging." Chinese Physics B 22, no. 1 (January 2013): 010203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/22/1/010203.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Fujita, Hiroyuki, John W. Missal, and Michael A. Morich. "Moment method analysis of mutual interaction in MRI phased array coils." Magma: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology, and Medicine 10, no. 2 (June 2000): 84–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02601843.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Kocharian, Armen, Joel P. Felmlee, Kiaran P. McGee, Stephen J. Riederer, and Richard L. Ehman. "Simultaneous image acquisition utilizing hybrid body and phased array receiver coils." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44, no. 4 (2000): 660–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4<660::aid-mrm23>3.0.co;2-s.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Guclu, Ceylan Celil, Ed Boskamp, Tsinghua Zheng, Ricardo Becerra, and LeRoy Blawat. "A method for preamplifier-decoupling improvement in quadrature phased-array coils." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 19, no. 2 (2004): 255–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10449.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Yung, Andrew C., Ali Y. Oner, Jean-Michel Serfaty, Mark Feneley, Xiaoming Yang, and Ergin Atalar. "Phased-array MRI of canine prostate using endorectal and endourethral coils." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 49, no. 4 (March 18, 2003): 710–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10432.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Giovannetti, Giulio, Francesca Frijia, Alessandra Flori, Angelo Galante, Carlo Rizza, and Marcello Alecci. "A Practical Guide to Estimating Coil Inductance for Magnetic Resonance Applications." Electronics 11, no. 13 (June 24, 2022): 1974. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131974.

Full text
Abstract:
Radiofrequency (RF) coils are employed to transmit and/or receive signals in Magnetic Resonance (MR) systems. The design of home-made, organ-specific RF coils with optimized homogeneity and/or Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) can be a plus in many research projects. The first step requires accurate inductance calculation, this depending on the conductor’s geometry, to later define the tuning capacitor necessary to obtain the desired resonance frequency. To fulfil such a need it is very useful to perform a priori inductance estimation rather than relying on the time-consuming trial-and-error approach. This paper describes and compares two different procedures for coil inductance estimation to allow for a fast coil-prototyping process. The first method, based on calculations in the quasi-static approximation, permits an investigation on how the cross-sectional geometry of the RF coil conductors affects the total inductance and can be easily computed for a wide variety of coil geometries. The second approach uses a numerical full-wave method based on the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) algorithm, and permits the simulation of RF coils with any complex geometry, including the case of multi-element phased array. Comparison with workbench measurements validates both the analytical and numerical results for RF coils operating within a wide field range (0.18–7 T).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Lee, Grace, Aytekin Oto, and Mihai Giurcanu. "Prostate MRI: Is Endorectal Coil Necessary?—A Review." Life 12, no. 4 (April 11, 2022): 569. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12040569.

Full text
Abstract:
To assess the necessity of endorectal coil use in 3 Tesla (T) prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a literature review comparing the image quality and diagnostic performance with an endorectal coil (ERC) and a without endorectal coil (NERC), with a phased array coil or a wearable perineal coil (WPC), was performed. A PubMed search of 3T prostate MRI using an endorectal coil for studies published until 31 July 2021 was performed. A total of 14 studies comparing 3T prostate MRI with and without endorectal coil use were identified. The quality scores and diagnostic performances were recorded for each study. In total, five studies compared image quality; five studies compared quality and performance; and four studies compared performance of detection, size of detected lesions, accuracy of cancer localization, and aggressiveness/staging. The use of an endorectal coil improved image quality with a higher overall signal to noise ratio, posterior and peripheral zone signal to noise ratio, high b-value attenuation diffusion coefficient (ADC) signal to noise ratio, and contrast to noise ratio. Endorectal coil use improved subjective image quality for anatomic detail on T2 weighted images (T2WI) and diffusion weighted images (DWI). Endorectal coil use had less motion artifact on DWI than non-endorectal coil use, but produced a higher occurrence of other artifacts on DWI. Endorectal coils had higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) in the detection of overall and index lesions, as well as smaller and less aggressive lesions, missing fewer and smaller lesions than non-endorectal coils. Endorectal coils had higher sensitivity than non-endorectal coils in localizing and staging lesions. Endorectal coils improved quantitative and qualitative image quality and diagnostic performance in the detection of smaller and less aggressive cancers in 3T prostate MRI.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Giovannetti, Giulio, Francesca Frijia, and Alessandra Flori. "Radiofrequency Coils for Low-Field (0.18–0.55 T) Magnetic Resonance Scanners: Experience from a Research Lab–Manufacturing Companies Cooperation." Electronics 11, no. 24 (December 19, 2022): 4233. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics11244233.

Full text
Abstract:
Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly popular due to cost reduction, artifact minimization, use for interventional radiology, and a better safety profile. The different applications of low-field systems are particularly wide (muscle–skeletal, cardiac, neuro, small animals, food science, as a hybrid scanner for hyperthermia, in interventional radiology and in radiotherapy). The low-field scanners produce lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) images with respect to medium- and high-field scanners. Thus, particular attention must be paid in the minimization of the radiofrequency (RF) coil losses compared to the sample noise. Following a short description of the coil design and simulation methods (magnetostatic and full-wave), in this paper we will describe how the choice of electrical parameters (such as conductor geometry and capacitor quality) affects the coil’s overall performance in terms of the quality factor Q, ratio between unloaded and loaded Q, and coil sensitivity. Subsequently, we will summarize the work carried out at our electromagnetic laboratory in collaboration with MR-manufacturing companies in the field of RF coil design, building, and testing for 0.18–0.55 T magnetic resonance (MR) clinical scanners by classifying them between surface-, volume-, and phased-array coils.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Hayes, C. E., J. S. Tsuruda, C. M. Mathis, K. R. Maravilla, M. Kliot, and A. G. Filler. "Brachial plexus: MR imaging with a dedicated phased array of surface coils." Radiology 203, no. 1 (April 1997): 286–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122409.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Schwartz, L. H., D. M. Panicek, E. Thomson, S. K. Herman, G. V. Shah, R. T. Heelan, Y. Fong, and L. H. Blumgart. "Comparison of phased-array and body coils for MR imaging of liver." Clinical Radiology 52, no. 10 (October 1997): 745–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80152-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Xu, Duan, Albert P. Chen, Charles Cunningham, Joseph A. Osorio, Sarah J. Nelson, and Daniel B. Vigneron. "Spectroscopic imaging of the brain with phased-array coils at 3.0 T." Magnetic Resonance Imaging 24, no. 1 (January 2006): 69–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2005.10.019.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Brown, Mark A. "Time-domain combination of MR spectroscopy data acquired using phased-array coils." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52, no. 5 (November 2004): 1207–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20244.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Natt, Oliver, Vitaliy Bezkorovaynyy, Thomas Michaelis, and Jens Frahm. "Use of phased array coils for a determination of absolute metabolite concentrations." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 53, no. 1 (2004): 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20337.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Wang, Jinghua, Maolin Qiu, and R. Todd Constable. "In vivo method for correcting transmit/receive nonuniformities with phased array coils." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 53, no. 3 (2005): 666–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20377.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Giovannetti, Giulio, Vittorio Viti, Vincenzo Positano, Maria Filomena Santarelli, Luigi Landini, and Antonio Benassi. "Magnetostatic simulation for accurate design of low field MRI phased-array coils." Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering 31B, no. 3 (2007): 140–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.20089.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Schlamann, Marc, Götz Lehnerdt, Stefan Maderwald, and Susanne Ladd. "Dynamic MRI of the vocal cords using phased-array coils: A feasibility study." Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 19, no. 2 (2009): 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.50830.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

While, Peter T., Larry K. Forbes, and Stuart Crozier. "An inverse method for designing RF phased array coils in MRI—theoretical considerations." Measurement Science and Technology 18, no. 1 (December 12, 2006): 245–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/18/1/031.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Coniglio, A., G. Vilches Freixas, A. Santarelli, M. Ciocca, and L. Begnozzi. "Quality assurance of phased array coils: Analysis of the noise amplification factor distribution." Physica Medica 32 (February 2016): 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.438.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Wang, Li-Jen, Yon-Cheong Wong, Chi-Jen Chen, Kuan-Gen Huang, and Swei Hsueh. "Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with integrated endorectal/phased-array coils: a pilot study." European Radiology 11, no. 9 (February 23, 2001): 1822–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300000794.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Maril, Nimrod, and Robert E. Lenkinski. "An automated algorithm for combining multivoxel MRS data acquired with phased-array coils." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 21, no. 3 (2005): 317–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20261.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Fang, Liang, Minjie Wu, Hengyu Ke, Anand Kumar, and Shaolin Yang. "Adaptively optimized combination (AOC) of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data from phased array coils." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 75, no. 6 (July 20, 2015): 2235–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25786.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Stocker, Daniel, Andrei Manoliu, Anton S. Becker, Borna K. Barth, Daniel Nanz, Markus Klarhöfer, and Olivio F. Donati. "Impact of different phased-array coils on the quality of prostate magnetic resonance images." European Journal of Radiology Open 8 (2021): 100327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100327.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Moritani, Toshio, Jack C. Kademian, Yoshimitsu Ohgiya, Takehiko Gokan, Hirotsugu Munechika, Hideki Yoshida, and Shuichi Ohta. "Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate carcinoma using phased-array coils: therapeutic effect and recurrence." Clinical Imaging 29, no. 6 (November 2005): 412–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.03.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Yun, SungDae, Walid E. Kyriakos, Jun-Young Chung, Yeji Han, Seung-Schik Yoo, and HyunWook Park. "Projection-based estimation and nonuniformity correction of sensitivity profiles in phased-array surface coils." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 25, no. 3 (2007): 588–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20826.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Beck, Michael J., Dennis L. Parker, Bradley D. Bolster, Seong-Eun Kim, J. Scott McNally, Gerald S. Treiman, and J. Rock Hadley. "Interchangeable neck shape-specific coils for a clinically realizable anterior neck phased array system." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 78, no. 6 (February 10, 2017): 2460–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26632.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Avdievich, Nikolai I., and Hoby P. Hetherington. "High-field head radiofrequency volume coils using transverse electromagnetic (TEM) and phased array technologies." NMR in Biomedicine 22, no. 9 (November 2009): 960–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1262.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Hayes, Cecil E., Mark J. Dietz, Bernard F. King, and Richard L. Ehman. "Pelvic imaging with phased-array coils: Quantitative assessment of signal-to-noise ratio improvement." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2, no. 3 (May 1992): 321–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880020312.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Wijtenburg, S. Andrea, and Jack Knight-Scott. "Reconstructing very short TE phase rotation spectral data collected with multichannel phased-array coils at 3 T." Magnetic Resonance Imaging 29, no. 7 (September 2011): 937–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2011.03.005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Schmalbrock, Petra, Jan Pruski, Ling Sun, Anita Rao, and James W. Monroe. "Phased Array RF Coils for High-Resolution MRI of the Inner Ear and Brain Stem." Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 19, no. 1 (January 1995): 8–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199501000-00002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Dandan Liang, Hon Tat Hui, Tat Soon Yeo, and Bing Keong Li. "Stacked Phased Array Coils for Increasing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Magnetic Resonance Imaging." IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 7, no. 1 (February 2013): 24–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tbcas.2012.2194144.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Phased array coils' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography