Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Personality (five factor model) / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Personality (five factor model)'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Personality (five factor model).

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 20 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Personality (five factor model).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Jones, Celeste. "Five Factor Model: Insights into a College Population." Current Research in Psychology and Behavioral Science (CRPBS) 3, no. 6 (September 1, 2022): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.54026/crpbs/1062.

Full text

Abstract:

College is a time noted for identity development, personal challenges and growth all within a social context where students interact with people across the personality continuum. The five-factor model of personality is a theoretically and psychometrically robust personality model that can provide insight into the 1st year college population. We explored the personality profile and norms for this college population, including the relationship between personality factors and classic character virtues that were a part of their first-year college curriculum experience and the relationship between personality factors and selection of college major. Results showed the first-year students had higher scores on agreeableness and conscientiousness than the other personality factors. The analysis of character virtues and personality factors showed relationships between agreeableness with the virtues of empathy, justice and humility. The personality factor of openness correlated with creativity and curiosity, Neuroticism with temperance, and conscientiousness with curiosity. Exploration of the relationship between personality and college majors showed that students majoring in theology and business were lower in agreeableness than students in kinesiology, nursing, psychology, education or social work. Students in the school of design and psychology had relatively lower scores in neuroticism than did students in the natural sciences, engineering, business or nursing. These results suggest that the five factor personality assessment may provide helpful insights to students and faculty as they navigate their first year of college.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Costa, Paul T., and Robert R. McCrae. "Personality Disorders and The Five-Factor Model of Personality." Journal of Personality Disorders 4, no. 4 (December 1990): 362–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1990.4.4.362.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Widiger, Thomas A., and Jennifer Ruth Lowe. "Five-Factor Model Assessment of Personality Disorder." Journal of Personality Assessment 89, no. 1 (September 2007): 16–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223890701356953.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Miller, Joshua D., Paul A. Pilkonis, and Jennifer Q. Morse. "Five-Factor Model Prototypes for Personality Disorders." Assessment 11, no. 2 (June 2004): 127–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191104264962.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Boudreaux, Michael J. "Personality-related problems and the five-factor model of personality." Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 7, no. 4 (October 2016): 372–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/per0000185.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Zuroff, David C. "Depressive Personality Styles and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Journal of Personality Assessment 63, no. 3 (December 1994): 453–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Montag, Itzhak, and Joseph Levin. "The five‐factor personality model in applied settings." European Journal of Personality 8, no. 1 (March 1994): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080102.

Full text

Abstract:

Two studies of the Revised NEO‐Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) conducted on two different applicant samples (one consisting of 539 female subjects and the other consisting of 396 male subjects) are reported. Factor analysis of the female sample yielded a five‐factor solution, highly congruent with the factors presented by Costa, McCrae and Dye (1991). Results of the male data were less clear‐cut, yielding four to five factors which were moderately congruent with the American data. The combined male and female sample showed again high congruence coefficients. Various minor deviations in the location of the facet variables are discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Ramanaiah, Nerella V., Fred R. J. Detwiler, and Anupama Byravan. "Life Satisfaction and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Psychological Reports 80, no. 3_suppl (June 1997): 1208–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.80.3c.1208.

Full text

Abstract:

The hypothesis that happy and unhappy people have different personality profiles based on five personality factors (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness) was tested using 245 undergraduates (111 men and 134 women) who completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the NEO Personality Inventory. Analysis indicated that High and Low Satisfaction groups had significantly different personality profiles, supporting the hypothesis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Sharpe, J. Patrick, and Nerella V. Ramanaiah. "Materialism and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Psychological Reports 85, no. 1 (August 1999): 327–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.85.1.327.

Full text

Abstract:

The hypothesis that High and Low Materialism groups have different personality profiles was tested with 280 introductory psychology students (135 men and 145 women) who completed the Belk Materialism Scale and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory for partial course credit. Results of discriminant function analysis supported the hypothesis, indicating that groups High and Low in Materialism had significantly different personality profiles and that the standard discriminant function coefficients were substantial (>.30): for Neuroticism −.59, Agreeableness .53, and Openness .32.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Pareke, Fahrudin JS, and Rina Suthia Hayu. "Empirical Investigation of Five-Factor Model of Personality." AFEBI Management and Business Review 1, no. 1 (June 14, 2016): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.47312/ambr.v1i1.28.

Full text

Abstract:

<p>The concept of Five-Factor Model (FFM) of Personality describes the basic dimension of human behavior, thinking, and emotions that related to the job. The FFM currently getting popular and reach more attention to from the scholars and practitioners as well, particularly in the area of human resource management. Therefore, the main goal of current research is to compile and to test the dimensions of FFM and its measure empirically. Eighty-four self report measures distributed to the 238 employees who work both for public and private organizations at the Northern Sumatera Island, Indonesia. The respondents are currently completing their graduate programs at the University of Bengkulu. Two-hundred-and-eighteen questionnaires completed and returned by respondents, and analyzed using Factor Analysis with Varimax Approach to extract them in to the several components. Based on the analyses, research confirmed the 5 dimensions for FFM, which is conscientiousness (18 items), extraversion-introversion (18 items), agreeableness (12 items), openness to experience (14 items), and emotional stability (12 items). The result strictly recommended that the use of FFP as a means of Human Resource Practices such as selection, promotion, training, and the like.</p><p><br />Keywords: Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Openness to Experiences, Personality</p>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

SASAKI, JUN, TAKAHIRO HOSHINO, and YOSHIHIKO TANNO. "Psychopathologies and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 50, no. 1 (2002): 65–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.50.1_65.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Judge, Timothy A., Joseph J. Martocchio, and Carl J. Thoresen. "Five-factor model of personality and employee absence." Journal of Applied Psychology 82, no. 5 (1997): 745–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.745.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Judge, Timothy A., and Joyce E. Bono. "Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership." Journal of Applied Psychology 85, no. 5 (2000): 751–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Terracciano, Antonio, and Paul T. Costa. "Smoking and the Five-Factor Model of personality." Addiction 99, no. 4 (April 2004): 472–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00687.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Digman, J. M. "Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model." Annual Review of Psychology 41, no. 1 (January 1990): 417–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Carvalho, Joana, and Pedro J. Nobre. "Five-Factor Model of Personality and Sexual Aggression." International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 63, no. 5 (March 22, 2013): 797–814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624x13481941.

Full text

Abstract:

Despite several studies have used the five-factor model (FFM) of personality as theoretical background, few studies have been conducted on the topic of the FFM and sexual aggression. This study explored how the big five dimensions and features of emotional adjustment characterize different forms of sexual violence. Twenty-six male students reporting sexual aggression against women (nonconvicted offenders), 32 convicted rapists, and 33 convicted child sexual molesters were evaluated. Participants completed the Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), the Brief Symptom Inventory (assessing state emotional adjustment), the Sexual Experiences Survey (perpetration form), and the Socially Desirable Response Set Measure. Results showed that individuals convicted for rape and child sexual abuse presented significantly more neuroticism than nonconvicted sexual offenders; child sex molesters presented significantly less openness than rapists and nonconvicted sexual offenders; and nonconvicted sexual offenders presented significantly less conscientiousness than convicted offenders. Regarding emotional adjustment, convicted rapists revealed marked psychopathological features in relation to child molesters. In addition, convicted rapists and nonconvicted sexual offenders presented significantly more hostility than child sexual molesters. Findings suggested that some of the big five traits as well as state features characterizing emotional adjustment may characterize different types of sexual offenders.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

De Fruyt, Filip, and Johan Denollet. "Type D Personality: A Five-Factor Model Perspective." Psychology & Health 17, no. 5 (January 2002): 671–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870440290025858.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Rice, Kenneth G., Jeffrey S. Ashby, and Robert B. Slaney. "Perfectionism and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Assessment 14, no. 4 (December 2007): 385–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191107303217.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Gurrera, Ronald J., Chandlee C. Dickey, Margaret A. Niznikiewicz, Martina M. Voglmaier, Martha E. Shenton, and Robert W. McCarley. "The five-factor model in schizotypal personality disorder." Schizophrenia Research 80, no. 2-3 (December 2005): 243–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.08.002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Cramer, Kenneth M., and Eiko Imaike. "Personality, blood type, and the five-factor model." Personality and Individual Differences 32, no. 4 (March 2002): 621–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00064-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Jafari, Reyhaneh, Rahim Shahbodaghi, Hasan Ashayeri, Mohammadreza Keyhani, and Mehdi Baziyar. "The Five Factor Model of Personality and Stuttering." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 127 (April 2014): 307–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.261.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Wise, Thomas N., Lee S. Mann, and Laurel Shay. "Alexithymia and the five-factor model of personality." Comprehensive Psychiatry 33, no. 3 (May 1992): 147–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-440x(92)90023-j.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Gurrera, R. J., N. Akhtar, S. Akdag, B. O'Donnell, P. Nestor, and R. W. McCarley. "280. The five-factor personality model in schizophrenia." Biological Psychiatry 43, no. 8 (April 1998): S84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(98)90728-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Pareke, Fahrudin JS, and Rina Suthia Hayu. "Empirical Investigation of Five-Factor Model of Personality." AFEBI Management and Business Review 1, no. 01 (March 14, 2017): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.47312/ambr.v1i01.28.

Full text

Abstract:

<p>The concept of Five-Factor Model (FFM) of Personality describes the basic dimension of human behavior, thinking, and emotions that related to the job. The FFM currently getting popular and reach more attention to from the scholars and practitioners as well, particularly in the area of human resource management. Therefore, the main goal of current research is to compile and to test the dimensions of FFM and its measure empirically. Eighty-four self report measures distributed to the 238 employees who work both for public and private organizations at the Northern Sumatera Island, Indonesia. The respondents are currently completing their graduate programs at the University of Bengkulu. Two-hundred-and-eighteen questionnaires completed and returned by respondents, and analyzed using Factor Analysis with Varimax Approach to extract them in to the several components. Based on the analyses, research confirmed the 5 dimensions for FFM, which is conscientiousness (18 items), extraversion-introversion (18 items), agreeableness (12 items), openness to experience (14 items), and emotional stability (12 items). The result strictly recommended that the use of FFP as a means of Human Resource Practices such as selection, promotion, training, and the like.</p><p><br />Keywords: Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Openness to Experiences, Personality</p>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

TANI, Iori. "Construct validity of five factor model of personality." Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 77 (September 19, 2013): 2AM—021–2AM—021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.77.0_2am-021.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

SHARPE, J. PATRICK. "MATERIALISM AND THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY." Psychological Reports 85, no. 5 (1999): 327. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.85.5.327-330.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Laverdière, Olivier, Dominick Gamache, Louis Diguer, Étienne Hébert, Sébastien Larochelle, and Jean Descôteaux. "Personality Organization, Five-Factor Model, and Mental Health." Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 195, no. 10 (October 2007): 819–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0b013e318156815d.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Reed, Mary Beth, Monroe A. Bruch, and Richard F. Haase. "Five-Factor Model of Personality and Career Exploration." Journal of Career Assessment 12, no. 3 (August 2004): 223–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069072703261524.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Widiger, Thomas A., and Timothy J. Trull. "Assessment of the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Journal of Personality Assessment 68, no. 2 (April 1997): 228–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Briggs, Stephen R. "Assessing the Five-Factor Model of Personality Description." Journal of Personality 60, no. 2 (June 1992): 253–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00974.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Borkenau, Peter. "Implicit Personality Theory and the Five-Factor Model." Journal of Personality 60, no. 2 (June 1992): 295–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00975.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Jackson, Douglas N., Sampo V. Paunonen, Maryann Fraboni, and Richard D. Goffin. "A five-factor versus six-factor model of personality structure." Personality and Individual Differences 20, no. 1 (January 1996): 33–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00143-t.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas, Matthias Backenstrass, Karen Kocherscheidt, Aoife Hunt, Jörg Unger, Peter Fiedler, and Christoph Mundt. "Typus melancholicus Personality Type and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Psychopathology 35, no. 6 (2002): 327–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000068596.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Pesic, Danilo, Tara Adzic, Olivera Vukovic, Marko Kalanj, and Dusica Lecic-Tosevski. "Analysis of personality disorder profiles obtained by five-factor personality model." Vojnosanitetski pregled 77, no. 9 (2020): 950–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/vsp180424175p.

Full text

Abstract:

Background/Aim. In spite of the growing body of evidence in the field of personality disorders, these disorders still retain the lowest diagnostic reliability of any major category of mental disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of personality profiles in patients diagnosed with personality disorder in comparison with the group of healthy control subjects, as well as to establish to what extent the five-factor personality model domains determine the specific clusters of personality disorders. Methods. The study group comprised 97 patients diagnosed as personality disorders (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ? DSM-IV criteria), aged between 18 and 65 years [mean = 35.78 years, standard deviation (SD) = 13.72 years], 67% were female. Control group included 58 healthy subjects (student population) aged between 20 to 35 years (mean = 22.48 years, SD = 2.56 years), 56% were female. The assessment was carried out by the new version of the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PIR), form S, and the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID II) for DSM-IV disorders. Results. The three clusters were found by the use of regression analysis: cluster A ? eccentrics (low scores in agreeableness), cluster B ? dramatics (high score in extroversion, low score in agreeableness, and cluster C ? anxious (low score in extroversion). The findings showed that the high level of neuroticism was a non-specific predictor of all three clusters, while dimension openness to experience had no predictive power for any of the three clusters. Conclusion. Our findings support the meta-analysis which suggests consistently high level of neuroticism and low level of agreeableness in most personality disorders. The study showed that it is possible to conceptualize personality disorders by using five-factor personality model of normal personality. Integrating the psychiatric classification with the dimensional model of general personality structure could enable the uncovering of essential parameters for setting the diagnosis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Goldberg, Lewis R. "Review of Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality." Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 31, no. 4 (1994): 748–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092325.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Paunonen, Sampo V., and Douglas N. Jackson. "The Jackson Personality Inventory and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Journal of Research in Personality 30, no. 1 (March 1996): 42–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Fruyt, Filip De, Robert R. McCrae, Zsófia Szirmák, and János Nagy. "The Five-Factor Personality Inventory as a Measure of the Five-Factor Model." Assessment 11, no. 3 (September 2004): 207–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191104265800.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Byravan, Anupama, and Nerella V. Ramanaiah. "Structure of the 16 PF Fifth Edition from the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model." Psychological Reports 76, no. 2 (April 1995): 555–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.555.

Full text

Abstract:

Factor structure of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (Fifth Edition) was investigated from the perspective of the five-factor model, using Goldberg's 1992 scales for five factors of personality and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales as markers for the five major personality factors. The three inventories were completed by 96 male and 92 female undergraduates. Results provided strong support for the generality and comprehensiveness of the five-factor model.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Zweig-Frank, Hallie, and Joel Paris. "The Five-Factor Model of Personality in Borderline and Nonborderline Personality Disorders." Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 40, no. 9 (November 1995): 523–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/070674379504000904.

Full text

Abstract:

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent the phenomena associated with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) can be described by the five-factor model of personality. Method The sample consisted of female patients with BPD (n=29) and a control group with a mixture of nonborderline personality disorders (n=30). All subjects were given the NEO-PI-R. Results Borderline patients differed from community norms on all five factors, and were particularly high on Neuroticism, and particularly low on Agreeableness. The scores on the five factors did not differ significantly between the 2 clinical groups. Two facets of the conscientiousness scale (competence and deliberation) were significantly lower in the BPD group. Conclusions Dimensional profiles only partially account for the clinical symptomatology seen in formally diagnosed cases of BPD.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Ramanaiah, Nerella V., Anupama Byravan, and Nguyen ThuHien. "Weinberger Adjustment Typology and the Five Factor Model of Personality." Psychological Reports 78, no. 2 (April 1996): 432–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.78.2.432.

Full text

Abstract:

Construct validity of Weinberger's Six-group Typology of Adjustment was investigated by testing the hypothesis that the six personality types have different personality profiles. The Weinberger Adjustment Inventory and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory were completed by 170 psychology undergraduates (84 men and 86 women). Results strongly supported the tested hypothesis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Deniston, William M., and Nerella V. Ramanaiah. "California Psychological Inventory and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Psychological Reports 73, no. 2 (October 1993): 491–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.491.

Full text

Abstract:

The generality and comprehensiveness of the five-factor model was tested using the California Psychological Inventory, with the Interpersonal Adjective Scales Revised—B5 and the NEO-Personality Inventory scales as markers for the five major personality factors. The three inventories were completed by 88 male and 99 female undergraduates. Results provided strong empirical evidence for the generality of four factors (Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness, and Conscientiousness) but not for the comprehensiveness of the five-factor model.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Zhang, Li‐fang, and Jiafen Huang. "Thinking styles and the five‐factor model of personality." European Journal of Personality 15, no. 6 (November 2001): 465–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.429.

Full text

Abstract:

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between thinking styles and the big five personality dimensions. Four hundred and eight (149 males, 259 females) university students from Shanghai, mainland China, responded to the Thinking Styles Inventory and the NEO Five‐Factor Inventory. It was found that thinking styles and personality dimensions overlap to a degree. As predicted, the more creativity‐generating and more complex thinking styles were related to the extraversion and openness personality dimensions, and the more norm‐favouring and simplistic thinking styles were related to neuroticism. No specific pattern was identified in the relationships of thinking styles to the agreeableness and conscientiousness dimensions. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Ramanaiah, Nerella V., John P. Sharpe, and Anupama Byravan. "Type a Behavior and the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Psychological Reports 81, no. 2 (October 1997): 368–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.81.2.368.

Full text

Abstract:

The hypothesis that people classified as Type A and Type B have different personality profiles based on five major personality factors (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness) was tested using the Student Jenkins Activity Survey and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Results based on discriminant function analysis of data from 243 psychology undergraduates (105 males and 138 females) strongly supported the hypothesis indicating that Type A and Type B groups have significantly different Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles and that the standardized discriminant function coefficients were large for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness and moderately large for Extraversion.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

ÖZSOY, Emrah, Emre EROL, Abdulmenaf KORKUTATA, and Mustafa ŞEKER. "COMPARISON OF PERSONALITY MODELS DIMENSIONS: TYPE A AND TYPE B PERSONALITY AND FIVE FACTOR PERSONALITY MODEL." INTERNATIONAL REFEREED JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND ACADEMIC SCIENCES 3, no. 9 (September 30, 2014): 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.17368/uhbab.201498884.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Aluja, Anton, Miguel Angel Sorrel, Luis F. García, Oscar García, and Fernando Gutierrez. "Factor Convergence and Predictive Analysis of the Five Factor and Alternative Five Factor Personality Models with the Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (FFICD)." Journal of Personality Disorders 36, no. 3 (June 2022): 296–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2021_35_542.

Full text

Abstract:

The authors analyze and compare the factor convergence and predictive power of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ/SF) with respect to the Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (FFiCD). A total of 803 White Spanish subjects were analyzed. All the personality domains had significant predictive power with regard to the FFiCD except NEO Openness. The explained variance of the personality domains with respect to FFiCD Negative Affectivity (71% and 77%) and Detachment (56% and 56%) were similar for NEO-PI-R and ZKA-PQ/SF, respectively, but the NEO-PI-R accounted for greater variance for FFiCD Anankastia, Dissociality, and Disinhibition. The FFiCD facets of Rashness, Thrill- Seeking (Disinhibition), and Unassertiveness (Detachment) were located in factors other than those theoretically expected. The authors conclude that normal personality measured by the NEO-PI-R and the ZKA-PQ/SF contribute, in a differential but complementary way, to knowledge of the maladaptive personality measured by the FFiCD.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Dunkley, David M., Kirk R. Blankstein, and Jody–Lynn Berg. "Perfectionism Dimensions and the Five–factor Model of Personality." European Journal of Personality 26, no. 3 (May 2012): 233–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.829.

Full text

Abstract:

This study of university students ( n = 357) and community adults ( n = 223) examined personal standards (PS) and evaluative concerns (EC) higher–order dimensions of perfectionism that underlie several measures from three different theoretical frameworks. In both students and community adults, confirmatory factor analyses supported PS perfectionism and EC perfectionism higher–order latent factors. In relation to the revised NEO Personality Inventory, PS perfectionism was primarily related to conscientiousness and achievement striving. In contrast, EC perfectionism was primarily related to neuroticism, and lower positive emotions, trust and competence. EC perfectionism accounted for unique variance in current depressive and anxious symptoms over and above the five–factor domain scores. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Jokela, Markus, Alexandra Alvergne, Thomas V. Pollet, and Virpi Lummaa. "Reproductive Behavior and Personality Traits of the Five Factor Model." European Journal of Personality 25, no. 6 (November 2011): 487–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.822.

Full text

Abstract:

We examined associations between Five Factor Model personality traits and various outcomes of reproductive behavior in a sample of 15 729 women and men from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) and Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) survey. Personality and reproductive history was self–reported in adulthood (mean age: 53 years). High extraversion, high openness to experience, and low neuroticism were associated with larger number of children in both sexes, while high agreeableness and low conscientiousness correlated with larger offspring number in women only. These associations were independent of marital status. There were also more specific associations between personality and timing of childbearing. The findings demonstrate that personality traits of the Five Factor Model are systematically associated with multiple reproductive outcomes. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Costa, Paul T., and Robert R. McCrae. "The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Its Relevance to Personality Disorders." Journal of Personality Disorders 6, no. 4 (December 1992): 343–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Bouchard, Genevieve, Yvan Lussier, and Stephane Sabourin. "Personality and Marital Adjustment: Utility of the Five-Factor Model of Personality." Journal of Marriage and the Family 61, no. 3 (August 1999): 651. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353567.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Allik, Jüri, Anu Realo, René Mõttus, Peter Borkenau, Peter Kuppens, and Martina Hřebíčková. "Person-Fit to the Five Factor Model of Personality." Swiss Journal of Psychology 71, no. 1 (January 2012): 35–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000066.

Full text

Abstract:

The Five Factor Model (FFM), a valid model of interindividual differences in the personality of a group of people, reportedly does not always provide a good fit for the individuals of that group. In addition to intraindividual variation across a considerable period of time, meaningful intraindividual variation can be observed within a single test administration. Two person-fit indices showed that the FFM is an adequate model for 95% of the 1,765 target-judge pairs in four different countries (Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia, and Germany): the double-entry intraclass correlation (ICCDE), which indicated that the 30 NEO PI-R scores on scales measuring the same personality trait are more similar and certainly less different than scores measuring different traits, and the individual contribution to the extracted eigenvalues (Zeig). The individual response pattern to the personality questionnaire characterized by the ICCDE and Zeig strongly determined the percentage of explained variance for the group-level factor structure of interindividual differences and the mean self-observer profile agreement. We demonstrate that, if the percentage of variance explained by the first five principal components is high enough, the FFM also provides an adequate fit at the individual level for most people.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!