Academic literature on the topic 'Permeable reactive barrier'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Permeable reactive barrier.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Permeable reactive barrier"

1

Thiruvenkatachari, R., S. Vigneswaran, and R. Naidu. "Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation." Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 14, no. 2 (March 2008): 145–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2007.10.001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Schwarz, Alex O., and Bruce E. Rittmann. "The diffusion-active permeable reactive barrier." Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 112, no. 1-4 (March 2010): 155–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.12.004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Oliveira, M., Ana Vera Machado, and Regina Nogueira. "Development of Permeable Reactive Barrier for Phosphorus Removal." Materials Science Forum 636-637 (January 2010): 1365–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.636-637.1365.

Full text
Abstract:
Permeable reactive barriers were developed for phosphorus removal. The barrier consists in an organic-inorganic hybrid material, which allows water and others species to flow through it, while selectively removes the contaminants. Polyethylene oxide (POE) and aluminium oxide (Al2O3) were used as the organic and the inorganic parts, respectively. The hybrid material was obtained by sol-gel reaction, using aluminium isopropoxide as inorganic percursor in order to attain Al2O3. The hybrid material produced was characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy and thermogravimetry. The previous tests for phosphorus removal have shown the effectiveness capacity of the developed material to remove it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Banasiak, Laura Joan, Buddhima Indraratna, Glenys Lugg, Udeshini Pathirage, Geoff McIntosh, and Neil Rendell. "Permeable reactive barrier rejuvenation by alkaline wastewater." Environmental Geotechnics 2, no. 1 (February 2015): 45–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.13.00122.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Molfetta, Antonio Di, and Rajandrea Sethi. "Clamshell excavation of a permeable reactive barrier." Environmental Geology 50, no. 3 (March 8, 2006): 361–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0215-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

He, Qianfeng, Shihui Si, Jun Yang, and Xiaoyu Tu. "Application of permeable reactive barrier in groundwater remediation." E3S Web of Conferences 136 (2019): 06021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913606021.

Full text
Abstract:
As a new in-situ remediation of groundwater, compared with the traditional “pump and treat” technology, the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) has the advantages of low cost, no external power, the small disturbance to groundwater, small secondary pollution and long-term operation, this paper introduces the basic concept of PRB, technical principle, structure type, the principle of active materials selection and mechanisms of remediation, design and installation factors, it provides ideas for further research and application of PRB technology in groundwater remediation projects in China.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Morgan, Lynn A., Don Ficklen, and Mary Knowles. "Site characterization to support permeable reactive barrier design." Remediation Journal 15, no. 4 (2005): 63–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rem.20060.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lee, Jejung, Andrew J. Graettinger, John Moylan, and Howard W. Reeves. "Directed site exploration for permeable reactive barrier design." Journal of Hazardous Materials 162, no. 1 (February 2009): 222–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.026.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Tigue, April Anne, Roy Alvin Malenab, and Michael Angelo Promentilla. "A systematic mapping study on the development of permeable reactive barrier for acid mine drainage treatment." MATEC Web of Conferences 268 (2019): 06019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926806019.

Full text
Abstract:
Acid mine drainage is a result of exposure of sulfide ore and minerals to water and oxygen. This environmental pollutant has been considered the second biggest environmental problem after global warming. On the other hand, permeable reactive barrier is an emerging remediation technology which can be used to treat acid mine drainage. However, the effectiveness of this proposed remediation technology greatly depends on the reactive media. Also, treatment of acid mine drainage using permeable reactive barrier is still in the infancy stage, and long-term performance is still unknown. Hence, this study was conducted to identify what have been studied, addressed and what are currently the biggest challenges and limitations on the use of permeable reactive barrier for acid mine drainage treatment. Through systematic mapping approach, the results have shown that the reactive media used in permeable reactive barrier can be categorized into five namely iron-based, organic-based, inorganic minerals-based, industrial waste-based, and combined media. The data revealed that majority of the papers which is about 40% use combined media as the reactive substrate. The future direction is toward the use of combined media as a reactive material for AMD treatment, for instance, use of geopolymer with mine tailings and silts as reactive media in combination with organic-based media
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Richards, Peter. "Seven‐year performance evaluation of a permeable reactive barrier." Remediation Journal 18, no. 3 (March 2008): 63–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rem.20172.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Permeable reactive barrier"

1

Abunada, Ziyad. "Innovative soil mix technology constructed permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2015. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.709154.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Painter, Brett Duncan Murray. "Optimisation of permeable reactive barrier systems for the remediation of contaminated groundwater." Phd thesis, Lincoln University. Environment, Society and Design Division, 2005. http://theses.lincoln.ac.nz/public/adt-NZLIU20061220.151030/.

Full text
Abstract:
Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) are one of the leading technologies being developed in the search for alternatives to the pump-and-treat method for the remediation of contaminated groundwater. A new optimising design methodology is proposed to aid decision-makers in finding minimum cost PRB designs for remediation problems in the presence of input uncertainty. The unique aspects of the proposed methodology are considered to be: design enhancements to improve the hydraulic performance of PRB systems; elimination of a time-consuming simulation model by determination of approximating functions relating design variables and performance measures for fully penetrating PRB systems; a versatile, spreadsheet-based optimisation model that locates minimum cost PRB designs using Excel's standard non-linear solver; and the incorporation of realistic input variability and uncertainty into the optimisation process via sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis and factorial analysis. The design methodology is developed in the context of the remediation of nitrate contamination due to current concerns with nitrate in New Zealand. Three-dimensional computer modelling identified significant variation in capture and residence time, caused by up-gradient funnels and/or a gate hydraulic conductivity that is significantly different from the surrounding aquifer. The unique design enhancements to control this variation are considered to be the customised down-gradient gate face and emplacement of funnels and side walls deeper than the gate. The use of velocity equalisation walls and manipulation of a PRB's hydraulic conductivity within certain bounds were also found to provide some control over variation in capture and residence time. Accurate functional relationships between PRB design variables and PRB performance measures were shown to be achievable for fully penetrating systems. The chosen design variables were gate length, gate width, funnel width and the reactive material proportion. The chosen performance measures were edge residence, centreline residence and capture width. A method for laboratory characterisation of reactive and non-reactive material combinations was shown to produce data points that could realistically be part of smooth polynomial interpolation functions. The use of smooth approximating functions to characterise PRB inputs and determine PRB performance enabled the creation of an efficient spreadsheet model that ran more quickly and accurately with Excel's standard non-linear solver than with the LGO global solver or Evolver genetic-algorithm based solver. The PRB optimisation model will run on a standard computer and only takes a couple of minutes per optimisation run. Significant variation is expected in inputs to PRB design, particularly in aquifer and plume characteristics. Not all of this variation is quantifiable without significant expenditure. Stochastic models that include parameter variability have historically been difficult to apply to realistic remediation design due to their size and complexity. Scenario and factorial analysis are proposed as an efficient alternative for quantifying the effects of input variability on optimal PRB design. Scenario analysis is especially recommended when high quality input information is available and variation is not expected in many input parameters. Factorial analysis is recommended for most other situations as it separates out the effects of multiple input parameters at multiple levels without an excessive number of experimental runs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Painter, Brett D. M. "Optimisation of permeable reactive barrier systems for the remediation of contaminated groundwater." Diss., Lincoln University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10182/12.

Full text
Abstract:
Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) are one of the leading technologies being developed in the search for alternatives to the pump-and-treat method for the remediation of contaminated groundwater. A new optimising design methodology is proposed to aid decision-makers in finding minimum cost PRB designs for remediation problems in the presence of input uncertainty. The unique aspects of the proposed methodology are considered to be: design enhancements to improve the hydraulic performance of PRB systems; elimination of a time-consuming simulation model by determination of approximating functions relating design variables and performance measures for fully penetrating PRB systems; a versatile, spreadsheet-based optimisation model that locates minimum cost PRB designs using Excel's standard non-linear solver; and the incorporation of realistic input variability and uncertainty into the optimisation process via sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis and factorial analysis. The design methodology is developed in the context of the remediation of nitrate contamination due to current concerns with nitrate in New Zealand. Three-dimensional computer modelling identified significant variation in capture and residence time, caused by up-gradient funnels and/or a gate hydraulic conductivity that is significantly different from the surrounding aquifer. The unique design enhancements to control this variation are considered to be the customised down-gradient gate face and emplacement of funnels and side walls deeper than the gate. The use of velocity equalisation walls and manipulation of a PRB's hydraulic conductivity within certain bounds were also found to provide some control over variation in capture and residence time. Accurate functional relationships between PRB design variables and PRB performance measures were shown to be achievable for fully penetrating systems. The chosen design variables were gate length, gate width, funnel width and the reactive material proportion. The chosen performance measures were edge residence, centreline residence and capture width. A method for laboratory characterisation of reactive and non-reactive material combinations was shown to produce data points that could realistically be part of smooth polynomial interpolation functions. The use of smooth approximating functions to characterise PRB inputs and determine PRB performance enabled the creation of an efficient spreadsheet model that ran more quickly and accurately with Excel's standard non-linear solver than with the LGO global solver or Evolver genetic-algorithm based solver. The PRB optimisation model will run on a standard computer and only takes a couple of minutes per optimisation run. Significant variation is expected in inputs to PRB design, particularly in aquifer and plume characteristics. Not all of this variation is quantifiable without significant expenditure. Stochastic models that include parameter variability have historically been difficult to apply to realistic remediation design due to their size and complexity. Scenario and factorial analysis are proposed as an efficient alternative for quantifying the effects of input variability on optimal PRB design. Scenario analysis is especially recommended when high quality input information is available and variation is not expected in many input parameters. Factorial analysis is recommended for most other situations as it separates out the effects of multiple input parameters at multiple levels without an excessive number of experimental runs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bulley, Jonathan A. "Improving performance of a permeable reactive barrier in the degradation of trichloroethylene using ultrasound." FIU Digital Commons, 2004. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1820.

Full text
Abstract:
The impact of ultrasound on improving the performance of a granular iron Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) in the degradation of Trichloroethylene (TCE) was evaluated. Two treatment columns made of clear Plexiglas with a height of 1ft and a diameter of 2 inches and filled with granular iron were used. One was fitted with 25Khz ultrasound probes. A solution of TCE was run through at constant flow rate. Samples obtained from the column at different residence times before and after sonication were analyzed for concentrations of TCE and used to generate concentration profiles to obtain rate constants, which were compared. An improvement of 23.4% in the reaction rate of TCE degradation was observed after sonication of the iron media suggesting that ultrasound may contribute to improving the performance of PRBs in the degradation of TCE in contaminated groundwater.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ulsamer, Signe Martha. "A Model to Characterize the Kinetics of Dechlorination of Tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene By a Zero Valent Iron Permeable Reactive Barrier." Digital WPI, 2011. https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/etd-theses/979.

Full text
Abstract:
"A one dimensional, multiple reaction pathway model of the dechlorination reactions of trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) as these species pass through a zero valent iron permeable reactive barrier (PRB) was produced. Three different types of rate equations were tested; first order, surface controlled with interspecies competition, and surface controlled with inter and intra species competition. The first order rate equations predicted the most accurate results when compared to actual data from permeable reactive barriers. Sensitivity analysis shows that the most important variable in determining TCE concentration in the barrier is the first order rate constant for the degradation of TCE. The velocity of the water through the barrier is the second most important variable determining TCE concentration. For PCE the concentration in the barrier is most sensitive to the velocity of the water and to the first order degradation rate constant for the PCE to dichloroacetylene reaction. Overall, zero valent iron barriers are more effective for the treatment of TCE than PCE. "
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Luo, Ping. "Quantification of morphological changes in zero valent iron (ZVI) : effect on permeable reactive barrier (PRB) longevity." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2009. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.503921.

Full text
Abstract:
Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) have been used world-wide to remediate chlorinated solvents, metals and radionuclides from contaminated groundwater by precipitation, sorption, ion exchange and biodegradation in the last two ;ades. There is still however limited information regarding the formation of byproducts and subsequent pore clogging with respect to attaining the predicted, significant life spans (>50 years), even on the most popular PRE materials such as ZVI. This project aimed to visually examine and quantify morphological :hanges on ZVI barriers and subsequently to quantify the PRE longevity due to the occlusions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Doherty, R. D. "Modelling of a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) in a manufactured gas plant site, Portadown, Northern Ireland." Thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.269086.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

McGeough, K. L. "Kinetics of contaminant removal : a comparative study of site specific treatability studies for permeable reactive barrier design." Thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2005. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.426659.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lai, Chun Kit. "Laboratory and full-scale studies of a permeable reactive barrier on the dechlorination of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons /." View abstract or full-text, 2004. http://library.ust.hk/cgi/db/thesis.pl?CIVL%202004%20LAI.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2004.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 203-227). Also available in electronic version. Access restricted to campus users.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Uyusur, Burcu. "Laboratory Investigation Of The Treatment Of Chromium Contaminated Groundwater With Iron-based Permeable Reactive Barriers." Master's thesis, METU, 2006. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12607550/index.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
Chromium is a common groundwater pollutant originating from industrial processes such as metal plating, leather tanning and pigment manufacturing. Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) have proven to be viable and cost-effective systems for remediation of chromium contaminated groundwater at many sites. The purpose of this research presented in this thesis is to focus on two parameters that affect the performance of PRB on chromium removal, namely the concentration of reactive media and groundwater flux by analyzing the data obtained from laboratory column studies. Laboratory scale columns packed with different amounts of iron powder and quartz sand mixtures were fed with 20 mg/l chromium influent solution under different fluxes. When chromium treatment efficiencies of the columns were compared with respect to iron powder/quartz sand ratio, the amount of iron powder was found to be an important parameter for treatment efficiency of PRBs. The formation of H2 gas and the reddish-brown precipitates throughout the column matrix were observed, suggesting the reductive precipitation reactions. SEM-EDX analysis of the iron surface after the breakthrough illustrated chromium precipitation. In addition to chromium
calcium and significant amount of iron-oxides or -hydroxides was also detected on the iron surfaces. When the same experiments were conducted at higher fluxes, an increase was observed in the treatment efficiency in the column containing 50% iron. This suggested that the precipitates may not be accumulating at higher fluxes which, in turn, create available surface area for reduction. Extraction experiments were also performed to determine the fraction of chromium that adsorbed to ironhydroxides. The analysis showed that chromium was not removed by adsorption to oxyhydroxides and that reduction is the only removal mechanism in the laboratory experiments. The observed rate of Cr(VI) removal was calculated for each reactive mixture which ranged from 48.86 hour-1 to 3804.13 hour-1. These rate constants and complete removal efficiency values were thought to be important design parameters in the field scale permeable reactive barrier applications.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Permeable reactive barrier"

1

Wilkin, Richard T. Field application of a permeable reactive barrier for treatment of arsenic in ground water. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Wilkin, Richard T. Field application of a permeable reactive barrier for treatment of arsenic in ground water. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Johnson, B. D. The potential of permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technology as a remediation tool for contaminated mine groundwater: Literature review, preliminary laboratory analysis & assessment. Gezina, South Africa: Water Research Commission, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Powell, Robert M. Economic analysis of the implementation of permeable reactive barriers for remediation of contaminated ground water. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Liu, Fei, Guoxin Huang, Howard Fallowfield, Huade Guan, Lingling Zhu, and Hongyan Hu. Study on Heterotrophic-Autotrophic Denitrification Permeable Reactive Barriers (HAD PRBs) for In Situ Groundwater Remediation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38154-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wilkin, Richard T. Capstone report on the application, monitoring, and performance of permeable reactive barriers for ground-water remediation. Cincinnati, OH: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Naidu, Ravi. Permeable Reactive Barrier: Sustainable groundwater remediation. Taylor & Francis, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Permeable Reactive Barrier: Sustainable Groundwater Remediation. Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Naidu, Ravi. Permeable Reactive Barrier: Sustainable Groundwater Remediation. Taylor & Francis, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

M, Powell Robert, United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Technology Innovation Office., and National Risk Management Research Laboratory (U.S.), eds. Permeable reactive barrier technologies for contaminant remediation. Washington, DC: Technical Information Office, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Permeable reactive barrier"

1

Niven, Robert K. "In Situ Fluidization for Permeable Reactive Barrier Installation and Maintenance." In ACS Symposium Series, 217–35. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-2002-0837.ch015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Thakur, Alok Kumar, and Manish Kumar. "Reappraisal of Permeable Reactive Barrier as a Sustainable Groundwater Remediation Technology." In Contaminants in Drinking and Wastewater Sources, 179–207. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4599-3_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hoppe, Jutta, David Lee, Sung-Wook Jeen, and David Blowes. "Longevity Estimates for a Permeable Reactive Barrier System Remediating a 90Sr Plume." In Uranium - Past and Future Challenges, 537–44. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11059-2_61.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lo, Irene M. C., Keith C. K. Lai, and Rao Surampalli. "Design Methodology for the Application of a Permeable Reactive Barrier for Groundwater Remediation." In Zero-Valent Iron Reactive Materials for Hazardous Waste and Inorganics Removal, 243–66. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784408810.ch14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Puls, Robert W., Robert M. Powell, Cynthia J. Paul, and David Blowes. "Groundwater Remediation of Chromium Using Zero-Valent Iron in a Permeable Reactive Barrier." In ACS Symposium Series, 182–94. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-1999-0725.ch013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Sorel, Dominique, Scott D. Warner, Bettina L. Longino, Jim H. Honniball, and Lisa A. Hamilton. "Performance Monitoring and Dissolved Hydrogen Measurements at a Permeable Zero Valent Iron Reactive Barrier." In ACS Symposium Series, 278–85. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-2002-0837.ch018.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Singh, Rahul, Sumedha Chakma, and Volker Birke. "Long-Term Performance Evaluation of Permeable Reactive Barrier for Groundwater Remediation Using Visual MODFLOW." In Environmental Processes and Management, 311–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38152-3_16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Sivavec, Timothy, Thomas Krug, Karen Berry-Spark, and Robert Focht. "Performance Monitoring of a Permeable Reactive Barrier at the Somersworth, New Hampshire Landfill Superfund Site." In ACS Symposium Series, 259–77. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-2002-0837.ch017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Yu, Binbin, Wei Xu, Xu Yang, Huimin Zhang, Zheng Fan, and Zucheng Wu. "Self-powered Redox Fuel Cell as Feasible Permeable Reactive Barrier for the Removal of Phenol." In Environmental Science and Engineering, 812–18. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2221-1_92.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Csővári, M., G. Földing, J. Csicsák, and É. Frucht. "Experience gained from the experimental permeable reactive barrier installed on the former uranium mining site." In Uranium, Mining and Hydrogeology, 133–40. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87746-2_20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Permeable reactive barrier"

1

Slater, Lee, Joe Baker, Andrew Binley, Danney Glaser, and Isaiah Utne. "Electrical Imaging Of Permeable Reactive Barrier (Prb) Integrity." In 15th EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.191.13esc3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Slater, Lee, Joe Baker, Andrew Binley, Danney Glaser, and Isaiah Utne. "Electrical Imaging of Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) Integrity." In Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2002. Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4133/1.2927095.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

MATHURA, SHASHI, and PRATIKSHA PANDEYB. "OPTIMAL DESIGN OF IN-SITU PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER." In WATER AND SOCIETY 2017. Southampton UK: WIT Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/ws170241.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Pathirage, Udeshini, and Buddhima Indraratna. "A Permeable Reactive Barrier Installed in Acid Sulfate Soil Terrain." In Geo-Chicago 2016. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784480144.031.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mallants, Dirk, Hugo Moors, Lian Wang, Norbert Maes, Hildegarde Vandenhove, Ludo Diels, Leen Bastiaens, and Johan Vos. "Testing Permeable Reactive Barrier Media for Remediation of Uranium Plumes in Groundwater." In ASME 2001 8th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2001-1263.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract In-situ treatment of contaminated groundwater by means of permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) is becoming a cost-effective remediation technique. Various reactive materials that might be used in PRBs were tested in their ability to remove uranium from groundwater. Materials tested include ferric oxyhydroxides, coarse- and fine-grained zero-valent iron, aluminium-iron oxides, and zeolites. Batch tests were used to evaluate the removal efficiency of these materials. To analyse the effect of groundwater composition on the interaction between dissolved uranium and reactive materials, two types of groundwater were used, mainly differing in carbonate content and pH. Considering an equilibration time of 48 hours and initial uranium concentrations between 2.4 and 24 mg/1, finegrained zero-valent iron proved to be most effective with a uranium removal efficiency of more than 96% for carbon-rich groundwater and 99% for carbon-poor groundwater. Intermediate efficiency was observed for coarsegrained zero-valent iron and aluminium-iron oxides. Less than 10% of the dissolved uranium was adsorbed on the iron oxyhydroxides. Zeolites did not remove any uranium from solution. Results further indicated a positive correlation between dissolved inorganic carbon content and dissolved uranium at equilibrium. Because it can be easily obtained at a fairly low price, zero-valent iron is a promising material for use in PRBs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Varner, Thomas, Harshad Vijay Kulkarni, M. Bayani Cardenas, Peter S. K. Knappett, Mesbah U. Bhuiyan, Kazi M. Ahmed, Abu Saeed Arman, Syed Humayun Akhter, and Saugata Datta. "SEDIMENTOLOGICAL CONTROLS ON ARSENIC MOBILIZATION IN A PERMEABLE NATURAL REACTIVE BARRIER (PNRB)." In GSA 2020 Connects Online. Geological Society of America, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/abs/2020am-358079.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Metz, Stacy E., and Craig H. Benson. "Iron Foundry Slags as Permeable Reactive Barrier Materials for Removing Arsenic from Groundwater." In Geo-Denver 2007. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40907(226)8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Shang, Hong, Sadra Javadi, and Qian Zhao. "Organic Surfactant Modified Zeolite as a Permeable Reactive Barrier Component—A Laboratory Study." In Geotechnical Frontiers 2017. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784480434.048.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kornilovych, B., L. Spasonova, I. Kovalchuk, and Y. Koshyk. "DEVELOPMENT A PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ECOLOGY STATUS OF ZHOVTY VODY CITY." In Monitoring 2019. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201903174.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ying, Zhang, and Zhang Chao-yu. "In-situ remediation of petroleum contaminated groundwater: Application and prospect of permeable reactive barrier." In 2011 International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cecnet.2011.5769387.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Permeable reactive barrier"

1

Strevett, Keith A., and M. S. Shaheed. Microbial Characteristics of a Reactive Permeable Barrier. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada388008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

LaBrecque, D. J., and P. L. Adkins. Automated Impedance Tomography for Monitoring Permeable Reactive Barrier Health. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/958215.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Phifer, M. A. Dexou low pH plume baseline permeable reactive barrier options. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/757359.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ramirez, A., and W. Daily. Electrical Resistivity Modeling of a Permeable Reactive Barrier for Vista Engineering Technologies: Summary. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/15009750.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gavaskar, A., W. S. Yoon, J. Sminchak, B. Sass, N. Gupta, J. Hicks, and V. Lal. Long Term Performance Assessment of a Permeable Reactive Barrier at Former Naval AITR Station Moffett Field. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada446918.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

DWYER, BRIAN P. Evaluation of a permeable reactive barrier technology for use at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/750882.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gavaskar, Arun, Neeraj Gupta, Bruce Sass, Woong-Sang Yoon, and Robert Janosy. Design, Construction, and Monitoring of the Permeable Reactive Barrier in Area 5 at Dover Air Force Base. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada380005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Slater, Lee, and Jaeyoung Choi. Investigating the potential for long-term permeable reactive barrier (PRB) monitoring from the electrical signatures associated with the reduction in reactive iron performance. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/838629.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Slater, Lee. Investigating the Potential for Long-Term Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) Monitoring from the Electrical Signatures Associated with the Reduction in Reactive Iron Performance. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/838635.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Slater, Lee. Investigating the potential for long-term permeable reactive barrier (PRB) monitoring from the electrical signatures associated with the reduction in reactive iron performance. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/839280.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography