Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Paul Feyerabend / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Paul Feyerabend.

Journal articles on the topic 'Paul Feyerabend'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 28 July 2024

Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Paul Feyerabend.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Anetoh, Bonaventure Chike. "An Analysis of Paul Feyerabend’s Incommensurability Theory." JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL POLICY 8, no. 2 (August 25, 2023): 25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.56201/jhsp.v8.no2.2022.pg25.39.

Full text

Abstract:

This article focuses on an analysis of Paul Feyerabend’s incommensurability theory. Paul Feyerabend and Thomas Kuhn are the proponents of incommensurability theory in contemporary philosophy of science, though their views on incommensurability thesis are not exactly the same. Incommensurability theory is one of the major contributions of Paul Feyerabend in philosophy of science. The fundamental questions are: What actually does Feyerabend mean by incommensurability of fundamental scientific theories? Do the meanings of scientific concepts change when scientific theories change? Do scientific theories affect the meanings of scientific concepts? How does Feyerabend’s incommensurability theory differ from that of Thomas Kuhn? Has Feyerabend’s incommensurability theory any implication for scientific development? What are the strengths and weaknesses of Feyerabend’s incommensurability theory? These and other related issues are the central focus of this article. Employing basically analytical method, this article examines Feyerabend’s incommensurability theory. This study discovers that Feyerabend’s incommensurability theory has both relationship of similarity and dissimilarity with that of Kuhn, and at the same time has implications for scientific development. It also argues that Feyerabend’s idea leads to relativism and subjectivism. The researcher concludes that though Feyerabend’s incommensurability theory has some shortcomings, Feyerabend is a force to reckon with in contemporary philosophy of science as a result of his innovations and revolutionary ideas in the discipline.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Widarda, Dodo. "Demokrasi Sosial dalam Pemikiran Paul Feyerabend." TEMALI : Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 2, no. 2 (July 3, 2019): 184–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/jt.v2i2.4444.

Full text

Abstract:

This article reevaluates Feyerabend’s thought in formatting social order based on his concept of Anything Goes. The discussion is a new challenge for social studies in the new circumstances and time. By taking Feyerabend’s books this study describes and analyzes the format of Feyerabend’s thought, what are being rejected by him, and what is being proposed by him in order to develop democracy in the community. By his effort, it is clear that Feyerabend places democracy as his fundamental reference for his idea of intellectual movement. Finally, this article contextualizes Feyerabend’s thought with what being happened in our time.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Hacking, Ian. "Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. Paul K. Feyerabend." Isis 87, no. 2 (June 1996): 334–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/357492.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Brown, Matthew J., and Ian James Kidd. "Introduction: Reappraising Paul Feyerabend." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57 (June 2016): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

VARGAS, MILTON. "PAUL FEYERABEND, O ANARQUISTA." Revista USP, no. 34 (August 30, 1997): 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i34p166-174.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

DÖRING, EBERHARD. "Paul K. Feyerabend, Zeitverschwendung." Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie (AZP) 20, no. 3 (1995): 273–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0340-7969-1995-3-273.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Wahyudi, M. Agus, Syamsul Rijal, Silahuddin, and M. Ikhwan. "IMPLIKASI EPISTEMOLOGIS PEMIKIRAN FILSAFAT PAUL KARL FEYERABEND: KEBEBASAN AKADEMIK DALAM PENGEMBANGAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ISLAM." Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy 4, no. 1 (September 3, 2023): 135–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.22515/ajipp.v4i1.6676.

Full text

Abstract:

Paul Karl Feyerabend has an idea called Epistemological Anarchism, which is a method used to criticize the establishment of knowledge with the aim of developing science itself. Academic freedom is one of the attitudes to develop knowledge while prioritizing objectivity. This research will discuss the implications of Feyerabend's thinking on developing knowledge and science in Islam. This research uses a library research approach with the method of collecting library data related to the research topic. The study results show that Feyerabend's concept of epistemological anarchism holds that there are no methodological rules in the development of knowledge and science. Feyerabend, finding a truth does not have to be through unnecessary falsification, but a truth can be found through new theories that have practical benefits. Epistemological anarchism has relevance to the epistemology of science development in Islam, namely as a way or steps to obtain educational knowledge based on Islamic fundamentals.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Pridar, Ahmad Ashshiddiqie, and Sabarudin Sabarudin. "Anarchism Paul Karl Feyerabend: His Concept and Dedication to Development of Contemporary Islamic Education." Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan 7, no. 2 (October 1, 2023): 3521–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.6951.

Full text

Abstract:

Education is a basic and very important activity for every individual. Through education, humans can gain knowledge about everything. Apart from that, education also influences human awareness in knowing God more deeply and understanding themselves. Therefore, quality education will provide the expected results, namely the use of an individual's intellectual abilities in all aspects of his life. Paul Karl Feyerabend is known as a controversial philosopher who put forward anarchist views in epistemology and scientific methodology. In the context of Islamic education, Feyerabend believes that freedom of thought, criticism and dialogue are important principles that must be emphasized in the learning process. The purpose of this research is to investigate the concept and dedication of Paul Karl Feyerabend in the context of contemporary Islamic education with an anarchist perspective. This research is library research with a qualitative approach that focuses on descriptive analysis based on data information obtained, including sources. primary or secondary. The results of the analysis show that in Feyerabend's view, the concept of anarchism is not about disorder or chaos, but rather about diversity, plurality, and criticism of authority and norms that inhibit freedom of thought and expression. Feyerabend's dedication to contemporary Islamic education can be seen in his efforts to promote freedom of thought, independent research and as a source of inspiration for developing alternative approaches to religious learning. The anything goes principle provides the basis for creating an educational environment that is inclusive, critical, and based on freedom of thought.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Munchin, David. "‘Is theology a science?’ Paul Feyerabend's anarchic epistemology as challenge test to T. F. Torrance's scientific theology." Scottish Journal of Theology 64, no. 4 (September 26, 2011): 439–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003693061100024x.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractTo answer in the affirmative Barth's question ‘Is theology a science? is to acknowledge both that such a question has a history and that the predicate ‘scientific’ is a contested one. T. F. Torrance inTheological Scienceand subsequent publications, seeks to proceed with a minimalist conception of science, as a study whose methods are directed by ‘faithfulness to object’. Paul Feyerabend, inAgainst Methodand subsequent publications, contends that such a minimalism amounts to an admission that there is no such thing as ‘the scientific method’, and that therefore the predicate ‘scientific’ lacks coherence and substance. According to Feyerabend, philosophers like Michael Polanyi (an important influence upon Torrance) are simply not bold enough to see their work through to the radical conclusions which it demands and he provides. For Feyerabend, science's reference to qualities such as ‘objectivity’ and ‘rationality’ are simply a smoke-screen for decisively influential vested interests of power and wealth – it is these which ultimately determine what we mean by science, and these which therefore must be unmasked in the cause of humanism. However, in the course of this dialogue we reveal that Feyerabend is too careless a thinker, given to rushing prematurely and too willingly to unwarranted and simplistic dichotomies. Thus Torrance's notion of the ‘scientific’ emerges intact, but not without Feyerabend's stimulating challenge raising important questions, not least to theology as a science. For here, above all, ‘human’ factors are likely unduly to influence scientific knowledge. Thus Feyerabend also points to areas where Torrance's project needs further development and closer scrutiny.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Gargiulo, Teresa. "El relativismo de Paul Karl Feyerabend." Ideas y Valores 65, no. 160 (March 31, 2016): 95–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v65n160.42248.

Full text

Abstract:

<p>Los críticos que han interpretado el pensamiento de Feyerabend como un relativismo radical no hacen justicia a su intencionalidad, y se muestran incapaces de comprender la unidad de su obra, en particular, su abandono posterior de los ideales relativis-tas. Se busca distinguir las diversas posiciones de Feyerabend frente al relativismo y exponer su reducción al absurdo de las nociones de la ciencia propias del positivis-mo lógico y del racionalismo crítico. Así mismo, se plantea cómo Feyerabend, ante la ausencia de un criterio para discernir la tarea científica, postula un relativismo, pero, al final de su vida, busca elaborar una metafísica de la abundancia que supere las coordenadas de aquel.</p>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Snelting, Gregor. "Paul Feyerabend und die Softwaretechnologie." Informatik-Spektrum 21, no. 5 (October 20, 1998): 273–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002870050105.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Snelting, Gregor. "Paul Feyerabend and software technology." International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT) 2, no. 1 (November 1, 1998): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100090050013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Dombrowski, Paul M. "Challenger through the Eyes of Feyerabend." Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 24, no. 1 (January 1994): 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/wxny-rq8c-j9l8-0qeq.

Full text

Abstract:

Paul Feyerabend elucidated the role of prior adherence to scientific theory in shaping subsequent perceptions of data. Thus one's theory choice shapes data, rather than data shaping theory, as is traditionally held. Feyerabend's philosophy also downplays the role of raw data, emphasizing instead debate among competing theories. This iconoclastic philosophy yields important new insights into the Challenger disaster, insights consonant with yet distinct from those of social constructionism. We learn from it the salience of meaning rather than raw data; the powerful role of prior conceptualizations in shaping the data of experience; and the surprising need for debate and pluralism for the wholesome pursuit of science and technology.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Abrahão, Luiz. "Contribuições de Paul Feyerabend para a Filosofia da Tecnologia: democratização e governança da ciência e tecnologia." Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences 40, no. 1 (July 30, 2018): 39334. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascihumansoc.v40i1.39334.

Full text

Abstract:

O texto reflete sobre as contribuições de Paul Feyerabend para a filosofia da tecnologia, com ênfase na discussão sobre democratização e governança da ciência e tecnologia. Inicialmente, apresentamos aspectos centrais da filosofia política de Feyerabend, especialmente a crítica do autor à hegemonia dos especialistas. Em seguida, recuperamos debates contemporâneos sobre a autoridade científica que dialogam com a filosofia de Feyerabend. Concluímos que o valor da filosofia pluralista de Feyerabend para a filosofia da tecnologia não se restringe à crítica da superioridade teórica da ciência.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Susih, Euis. "Tinjauan Deskriptif Kasus Papua Merdeka dengan Pendekatan Damai Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Feyerabend." Konstruksi Sosial : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial 1, no. 2 (April 24, 2024): 48–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.56393/konstruksisosial.v1i2.446.

Full text

Abstract:

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan kronologi kasus dari Konflik Papua Merdeka dari sudut pandang Paul Feyerabend Penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Studi kasus yaitu tentang konflik Papua Merdeka yang dianalisis dengan pembacaan pada kronologi kejadian dan deskripsi dari kasus. Penelitian ini berdasarkan kajian literatur terdahulu serta berupaya mengkaji mengenai analisis pemikiran. Ada keterkaitan antara studi kasus mengenai Konflik Papua Merdeka dengan pemikiran seorang Paul Feyerabend, yaitu dimana pemerintah Indonesia di ibaratkan sebagai metode dan ilmu pengetahuan yang kaku dan baku, sedangkan yang masyarakat Papua khususnya kelompok separatis diibaratkan sebagai Paul Feyerabend yang menantang dan mengkritik dengan pemikiran anarkisme epistemologi dan anything goes terhadap ke kakuan dan kebakuan ilmu pengetahuan dan metodenya yang diibaratkan sebagai pemerintah Indonesia. Saran penelitian bahwa bila masih berlanjutnya konflik Papua Merdeka di Indonesia, diharapkan agar bisa cepat terselesaikan dengan adanya kebijakan pemerintah terutama pendekatan damai.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Mindari, Endah Sri. "Analisis Studi Kasus Konflik Papua Merdeka Menggunakan Sudut Pandang Paul Feyerabend." Rhizome : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Humaniora 2, no. 2 (July 28, 2022): 63–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.56393/rhizome.v1i5.432.

Full text

Abstract:

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mencari hubungan dan melihat dari sudut pandang Paul Feyereband mengenai konflik Papua Merdeka. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Studi kasus secara sederhana diartikan sebagai proses penyelidikan atau pemeriksaan secara mendalam, terperinci, dan detail pada suatu peristiwa tertentu atau khusus yang terjadi. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan fenomena konflik Papua Merdeka menggunakan sudut pandang atau perspektif dari Paul Feyerabend merupakan dinamika sosial yang melawan sebuah sistem seperti againts method oleh Feyerabend. Kedua, masyarakat Papua merasa tidak menerima cukup hak sebagai bagian dari bangsa Indonesia melakukan perlawanan dan upaya pemisahan diri dari kungkungan Indonesia. Ini sama seperti demokrasi sosial oleh Feyerabend yang tujuannya adalah menciptakan suatu kondisi kebebasan dari kurungan suatu tirani dominasi yang telah terlembagakan. Itulah sebenarnya yang diinginkan oleh masyarakat Papua. Hak mereka untuk menentukan nasib sendiri sama seperti prinsip anything goes Feyerabend. Cara mengatasi konflik adalah dengan membawa perdamaian, keadilan dan kesetaraan di Papua.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Parascandalo, R., and V. Hosle. "Three Interviews with Paul K. Feyerabend." Telos 1995, no. 102 (January 1, 1995): 115–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.3817/1295102115.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Harman, Oren. "Philosophy of Nature by Paul Feyerabend." Common Knowledge 25, no. 1-3 (April 1, 2019): 458–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-7312681.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Preston, John. "Frictionless philosophy: Paul Feyerabend and relativism." History of European Ideas 20, no. 4-6 (February 1995): 963–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(95)95836-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Araújo, Priscila. "A conciliação entre realismo e relativismo segundo Paul Feyerabend." Em Construção, no. 1 (May 9, 2017): 123–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/emconstrucao.2017.28736.

Full text

Abstract:

DOI:10.12957/emconstrucao.2017.28128Pretendo discutir a ideia de que Paul Feyerabend, ao contrário da leitura que comumente é feita de suas obras, concilia realismo e relativismo. Conhecido pelo tom, às vezes irônico, com que tratava algumas questões conceituais, preferiu escolher uma palavra para definir suas teses que servisse mais para a compreensão por parte de seus críticos do que para os seus leitores mais atentos: o pluralismo. É fato que ele, em certa fase de sua produção também adotou o termo “relativismo” para denominar suas teses. Isso permitiu que muitos de seus leitores interpretassem suas ideias como se fosse uma defesa de um relativismo radical, o que não é correto. Feyerabend mantém, em seus textos, uma postura que não corresponde àquele relativismo que comumente lhe é atribuído. Procurarei explicitar as teses que Feyerabend assumia e explicar como sua postura se aproxima muito mais de uma possível conciliação entre realismo e relativismo do que de uma postura realista ou relativista. Mas seria Feyerabend um realista ou um relativista? Para Feyerabend, tais concepções não precisam ser encaradas como excludentes, dependendo de como se concebe a realidade e as nossas possibilidades de acesso cognitivo a ela. Em seu último trabalho, o livro publicado após a sua morte chamado Conquista da Abundância, Feyerabend retoma algumas de suas teses e trabalha de forma mais incisiva a sua posição com relação aos problemas do realismo, do relativismo e do pluralismo. Nessa obra, em especial, fica mais clara a sua concepção de realidade e em que sentido ele é um realista. Com isso, argumento que ele não é um relativista radical e que tem uma concepção de realidade. É neste sentido que ele defende uma conciliação entre realismo e relativismo, pois, mesmo atestando a existência da realidade e a possibilidade de acesso cognitivo a ela, ele não dá privilegio a uma ou outra forma de conhecimento. Ao final, explicarei como o pluralismo pode ser interpretado como um corolário desta conciliação.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Damasio, Felipe, and Luiz O. Q. Peduzzi. "Considerações sobre a alcunha atribuída a Paul Feyerabend de “pior inimigo da ciência” e suas implicações para o ensino de ciências." Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia 10, no. 1 (May 30, 2017): 329. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1982-5153.2017v10n1p329.

Full text

Abstract:

http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1982-5153.2017v10n1p329Não são poucos os críticos da epistemologia de Paul Feyerabend. Muitas dessas críticas foram recebidas com surpresa pelo próprio autor, por serem frutos de más interpretações de sua epistemologia feitas por profissionais, o que ele chamou de incompetência profissionalizada. Dentre os críticos de Feyerabend, alguns recorrem a um exemplar da prestigiada revista Nature de 1987 para dar lastro a suas críticas. Em tal exemplar, Feyerabend foi chamado de “pior inimigo da ciência”. Neste trabalho se procurará analisar quais foram os argumentos usados para atribuir tal alcunha a Feyerabend, algumas repercussões e se os argumentos usados pelos autores do artigo da revista Nature correspondem à epistemologia de Feyerabend ou se configuram no que ele chamou de incompetência profissionalizada. Algumas implicações desta discussão para o ensino de ciências também são vislumbradas.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Machado, Cristina De Amorim. "Tradução da introdução do livro Wissenschaft als Kunst de Paul Feyerabend." Em Construção, no. 1 (May 9, 2017): 152–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/emconstrucao.2017.28737.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Muhyiddin, Dandy Sobron, Nanat Fatah Natsir, and Erni Haryanti. "Memahami Gagasan Anything Goes Paul Karl Feyerabend dan Implikasinya terhadap Pendidikan Islam." JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 5, no. 1 (January 14, 2022): 290–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i1.412.

Full text

Abstract:

Penelitian ini menjelaskan tentang memahami gagasan anything goes Paul Karl Feyerabend dan implikasinya terhadap pendidikan islam. Metode yang digunakan dalam kajian ini menggunakan metode atau pendekatan kepustakaan (library research), bahwa studi pustaka atau kepustakaan dapat diartikan sebagai serangkaian kegiatan yang berkenaan dengan metode pengumpulan data pustaka, membaca dan mencatat serta mengolah bahan penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa gagasan Feyerabend yang disebut anarkisme epistemologis, yaitu suatu teori epistemologi yang memiliki pandangan tidak ada aturan metodologis untuk pengembangan sains. Sains harus dikembangkan melalui regulasi universal tanpa merusak atau membatasi sains itu sendiri. Menurut Feyerabend, tidak perlu falsifikasi suatu teori untuk menemukan kebenaran, melainkan dengan mencoba menemukan teori-teori baru yang dibangun, dikembangkan, dan dipertahakan (theoretical pluralism). Pluralisme teori penting untuk menghindari keseragaman yang membatasi berpikir kritis. Gagasan anything goes dikemukakan bahwa hipotesis apa pun dapat digunakan, termasuk yang tidak wajar dapat diterima atau menyimpang dari teori umum dan muncul dari proses eksperimental. Feyerabend menekankan bahwa kemajuan ilmiah tidak hanya ditentukan oleh proses induktif seperti sains biasa, tetapi juga secara kontrainduktif. Gagasan Feyerabend tentang anarkisme epistemologis bisa berpengaruh pada pengembangan pendidikan Islam. Dengan prinsip anything goes dalam pemikirannya, seseorang dapat menghilangkan atau setidaknya mengurangi terjadinya monopoli dari satu metode ke metode lainnya.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Sagita, Devy Eka Yanthi. "Konflik Dan Solusi Papua Merdeka Dalam Pemikiran Paul Feyerabend." Konstruksi Sosial : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial 3, no. 2 (April 24, 2024): 47–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.56393/konstruksisosial.v1i6.440.

Full text

Abstract:

Artikel ini memiliki tujuan yaitu: pertama, mengidentifikasi hal-hal apa saja yang menyebabkan terjadi konflik di tanah Papua dan bentuk dan dampak yang terjadi akibat konflik Papua. Kedua, mengindentifikasi upaya dan solusi pemerintah Indonesia untuk Papua dan menggambarkan suatu sudut pandang Paul Feyerabend pada konflik Papua. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan studi kepustakaan. Studi kepustakaan dimaksudkan untuk memahami beragam literatur yang terkait dengan program dan penerapan merdeka belajar di sekolah. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa Gagasan yang ditulis Feyerabend mengenai Anarkisme Epistemologi tentunya tidak hanya didedikasikan bagi kepentingan dalam dunia sains atau ilmiah saja, tetapi juga dalam pergulatan sosial dan budaya agar lebih praktis, menurut Feyerabend gagasan tersebut tidak hanya penting dalam pengembangan metodologi saja, melainkan sebuah pandangan kemanusiaan. Seperti yang kita ketahui bahwa dalam kehidupan sosial dalam masyarakat Papua banyak sekali terjadi konflik hingga gerakan separatism. Pada saat itu kekerasan dipercayai sebagai instrument untuk mencapai titik kekuasaan. Kekerasan menjadi alat untuk mencapai sebuah rasa kepuasaan.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Ortiz, Rodrigo. "Ciencia y pluralismo metodológico. Implicancias para la investigación social y educativa." Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria 1, no. 1 (December 1, 2019): 214–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.54802/r.v1.n1.2019.8.

Full text

Abstract:

El presente artículo tiene como objetivo realizar un recorrido por las principales concepciones contemporáneas de ciencia, desde los trabajos realizados por Karl Popper, Tohmas Kuhn, Imre Lakatos y Paul Feyerabend. Se trata de trabajo de revisión de literatura, que profundiza en la perspectiva del pluralismo metodológico propuesto por Feyerabend, para relacionarlo con el campo de las ciencias sociales y su repercusión en la investigación educativa.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

SMIRNOV, SERGEY A. "PAUL FEYERABAND: THE RESTLESS ANARCHIST." Chelovek.RU, no. 2021-16 (November 22, 2021): 150–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.32691/2410-0935-2021-16-150-180.

Full text

Abstract:

The article provides a reflexive analysis of the autobiographical experience presented in the autobiography of Paul Feyerabend "Killing Time". The specificity of the genre and method of the author's work on his own biography is highlighted. It is shown that this experience is strikingly different both from that to which European continental thinkers or domestic philosophers are accustomed, and from that which is presented in the Western intellectual tradition. Feyerabend deliberately built his story as "light reading", comparable to comics, musical script and stand-up comedy genre. At the same time, it is shown that as the story progresses, the position of the narrator himself changes and his very intonation changes towards more personal and spiritual tones and topics related to personality changes. The author was least of all interested in his own intellectual pursuits, and most of all he was interested in emotional attachments and love for one's neighbor. For the sake of this love, he wrote, in essence, his autobiography, strangely similar to the genre of repentance of the restless atheist anarchist.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Journet, Nicolas. "Paul Feyerabend, Bruno Latour : La raison disloquée." Les Grands Dossiers des Sciences Humaines N° 29, no. 12 (December 1, 2012): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/gdsh.029.0018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

de Carvalho e Silva, Porfirio Simões. "A Filosofia da Ciência de Paul Feyerabend." Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 5, no. 10 (1997): 178–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philosophica199751029.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Kidd, Ian James. "Philosophy of Nature, written by Paul Feyerabend." Journal of the Philosophy of History 13, no. 2 (June 21, 2019): 281–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341385.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Munchin, David. "Paul Feyerabend: The Worst Friend of Theology?" Theology and Science 17, no. 4 (October 2, 2019): 469–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2019.1670962.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. "Obituary of Paul K. Feyerabend (1924?1994)." Erkenntnis 40, no. 3 (May 1994): 289–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01128899.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Nurnazmi, Nurnazmi, Hala Saied Sayed Ahmed Mahmoud, and Mohamad Anas. "ANARKISME EPISTEMOLOGIS PAUL KARL FEYERABEND DALAM KAJIAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN." EDU SOCIATA ( JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SOSIOLOGI) 6, no. 1 (June 8, 2023): 41–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.33627/es.v6i1.1110.

Full text

Abstract:

Teori sebelumnya menyatakan bahwa syarat untuk mengatakan makna benar di dalam sebuah pernyataan ilmiah adalah verifikasi. Popper dengan falsifikasinya mensyaratkan uji kesalahan dalam menentukan dasar-dasar atau hukum-hukum ilmu pengetahuan, sedangkan Feyerabend menolak pendapat-pendapat tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yakni library research dengan desain library research. Paradigma penelitian yang sesuai dengan masalah dan tujuan penelitian yakni paradigma pragmatis. Desain library research deskriptif. Anarkisme epistemologi Feyerabend, antara lain: (1) Anti Metode, Prinsip apa saja boleh memperolehkan semua metode dan teori untuk digunakan dengan harapan akan memuncukan suatu perdebatan yang dinamis dan akan mewujudkan pengembangbiakan pengetahuan. (2) Anti Sains, Feyerabend mengkritik sains yang terlalu mengabaikan realitas keragaman pengalaman lapangan. (3) Kontra Induksi (counterinduction), induksi sebagai sebuah metode selalu mengabaikan fakta-fakta yang tidak mendukung teorinya. Maka untuk mengatasi kekurangan prinsip verifikasi dan falsafikasi ini prosedur kontra induksi diajukan. (4) Prinsip Pengembangan (proliferation), sebuah hipotesa atau teori baru tidak harus memenuhi seluruh elemen dari teori lama karena hal tersebut hanya akan menyebabkan teori lama dipertahankan dari pada mencari teori yang benar. dan (5) Incommensurability, mengacu pada hubungan dari dua atau lebih teori yang saling berkompetisi dan saling menjatuhkan satu dengan yang lain.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Bastos, Francisco Inácio. ""Anything goes"?: o diálogo implícito de Paul Feyerabend com dois pesquisadores brasileiros, Maurício da Rocha e Silva e Newton Freire-Maia." História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 17, no. 1 (March 2010): 141–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702010000100009.

Full text

Abstract:

O filósofo Paul Feyerabend e os cientistas brasileiros Maurício da Rocha e Silva e Newton Freire-Maia foram contemporâneos e viram-se às voltas com dilemas fundamentais da ciência. A proposta anarquista de Feyerabend, então embrionária, foi formulada em paralelo por Rocha e Silva, em sua crítica ao método científico. Transcorridas duas décadas, as ideias de Feyerabend parecem motivar implicitamente Newton Freire-Maia nas reflexões sobre a ciência. A teia de inter-relações das ideias desses três homens - que jamais interagiram - toca questões centrais da ciência brasileira de 1960 a 1980, período em que ela se consolida, em diálogo com a nascente reflexão sobre a ciência e o método científico no país.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Oliveveira, Diego Alexandre D. de, and Ana Luiza Ruschel Nunes. "CONTRA O STATUS QUO: O ANARQUISMO EPISTEMOLÓGICO DE PAUL FEYERABEND / AGAINST THE STATUS QUO: ANARCHISM EPISTEMOLOGICAL OF PAUL FEYERABEND." Brazilian Journal of Development 7, no. 1 (2021): 11311–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.34117/bjdv7n1-773.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Pinto, André Luiz, and Nestor Cortez Saavedra Filho. "Diálogos possíveis entre o pluralismo epistemológico de Paul Feyerabend e a educação científica." Filosofia e Educação 14, no. 3 (January 9, 2024): 91–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/rfe.v14i3.8673735.

Full text

Abstract:

A questão dos letramentos e da inovação demonstram-se fundamentais em períodos históricos como o atual, onde as práticas de ensino-aprendizagem tornam-se cada vez mais complexas, que requerem novas abordagens teóricas para compreendermos possibilidades alternativas de ensino. Tendo estas questões em mente, este artigo visa indicar relações possíveis entre o antifundacionismo, o pensamento de Paul Feyerabend e os letramentos científicos. Em um primeiro momento indicaremos questões relativas ao antifundacionismo, e em seguida verificaremos como tal questão se efetiva no pensamento de Feyerabend. Finalizaremos avaliando como esta abordagem pode fundamentar novas práticas educacionais.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Garcia, Silas Alberto, Paulo Evaldo Fensterseifer, and Gabriel Carvalho Bungenstab. "FILOSOFIA DA CIÊNCIA E LITERATURA." Saberes: Revista interdisciplinar de Filosofia e Educação 24, no. 1 (June 23, 2024): EN02. http://dx.doi.org/10.21680/1984-3879.2024v24n1id35217.

Full text

Abstract:

O objetivo deste ensaio é oferecer um encontro reflexivo entre a literatura e a filosofia da ciência a partir de um diálogo entre a obra literária de Machado de Assis e os escritos de Paul Feyerabend sobre a ciência. Para tal, realizou-se uma apresentação do conto “O Alienista” no intuito de discutir os pontos de convergência desse conto - e de seu autor - com a concepção de ciência de Feyerabend. A disposição dialógica estabelecida a partir das obras de Machado de Assis e Feyerabend auxilia nas reflexões críticas sobre: 1) a ciência como verdade absoluta e; 2) a questão da educação científica. Por fim, fica nítido que tanto as concepções de Machado de Assis quanto as de Feyerabend sobre a ciência possibilitam manter o diálogo aberto e a esperança de que a ciência – e seus pesquisadores – possam exercer suas atividades de forma prudente e crítica para que, junto à população, possam constituir uma vida decente e emancipada.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Damasio, Felipe, and Luiz O. Q. Peduzzi. "A COERÊNCIA E COMPLEMENTARIDADE ENTRE A TEORIA DA APRENDIZAGEM SIGNIFICATIVA CRÍTICA E A EPISTEMOLOGIA DE PAUL FEYERABEND." Investigações em Ensino de Ciências 20, no. 3 (December 31, 2015): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2016v20n3p61.

Full text

Abstract:

Pesquisadores em ensino de Ciências têm defendido o ensino concomitante de e sobre ciência. Para a abordagem da natureza e história da ciência na Educação Básica é necessário, no entanto, que se tenha um enfoque epistemológico, que pode ir do racionalismo de Bunge ao relativismo de Feyerabend. No presente trabalho, se defende que a postura epistemológica de Feyerabend é a que mais pode contribuir para promover a aprendizagem significativa crítica, de tal modo a formar pessoas inquisitivas, flexíveis, criativas, inovadoras, tolerantes e liberais. Além disto, as sugestões da epistemologia de Feyerabend também complementam a Teoria da Aprendizagem Significativa Crítica ao propor um currículo e um contexto para que os princípios da teoria estejam nas salas de aula de ciências.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Dutra, Crysman. "CIÊNCIA, UM MONSTRO: LIÇÕES TRENTINAS." Sapere Aude 9, no. 17 (July 13, 2018): 328–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5752/p.2177-6342.2018v9n17p328-335.

Full text

Abstract:

Publicado em língua portuguesa no ano de 2016, Ciência, um monstro: Lições trentinas contém uma série de palestras proferidas pelo físico e filósofo austríaco Paul Karl Feyerabend (1924-1994), que foi – juntamente com Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn e Imre Lakatos – um dos filósofos da ciência mais respeitados do século XX. As conferências ocorreram entre os dias 4 e 8 de maio de 1992, na cidade de Trento, Itália. Além das quatro conferências que já estavam definidas, Feyerabend permitiu mais um encontro com o público, no qual foi feito um debate em que a plateia apresentava suas dúvidas e objeções quanto às palestras e às ideias anarquistas de Feyerabend. A edição brasileira foi traduzida por Rogério Bettoni e conta com um excelente artigo de abertura elaborado por Luiz Henrique de Lacerda Abrahão.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Goll, Caroline Krüger Coral, Jakson Klint Meller, Diego Teixeira Witt, Kariston Pereira, Avanilde Kemczinski, and Tatiana Comiotto. "Anarquismo Metodológico de Paul Feyerabend: abordagens na Ciência." Revista Thema 15, no. 2 (May 20, 2018): 539–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.15536/thema.15.2018.539-552.827.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Benvenuto, S. "Paul K. Feyerabend (1924-1994) -- Search for Abundance." Telos 1995, no. 102 (January 1, 1995): 107–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3817/1295102107.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Kermode, Frank. "A Reply to Paul Feyerabend and Richard Rorty." Common Knowledge 25, no. 1-3 (April 1, 2019): 346–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-7299450.

Full text

Abstract:

This retitled excerpt from Frank Kermode’s introduction to the symposium “Beyond Post-: A Revaluation of the Revaluation of All Values” (Common Knowledge 1:3 [Winter 1992]: 10–12) is republished here in a special issue of representative pieces from the journal’s first twenty-five years. Kermode had called for papers in the journal’s inaugural issue (1:1 [Spring 1992]: 5–6) on “the question of value” and was to a degree disappointed with the results. He had wanted the ensuing symposium to treat and even focus on axiology in the arts, but the papers answering his call mainly dealt with political and ethical matters. In this introduction he replies chiefly to pieces by the philosophers Richard Rorty and Paul Feyerabend dealing with poverty, famine, sickness, and environmental concerns, but Kermode also addresses and mostly agrees with arguments made in Common Knowledge 1:1 by the philosopher Bernard Williams. (Williams’s article, “Left-Wing Wittgenstein,” is likewise reprinted in the 2019 anniversary issue.) Kermode’s piece concludes by restating the hope of his call for papers that “the matter of literary value” will be treated “in the broad context” that Common Knowledge provides “for discussion of the philosophy of value. Precedence must obviously be given to a planet at risk, but to lose what has been valued in literature is a sure way of increasing the unpleasantness of the future.”

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Munévar, Gonzalo. "Historical antecedents to the philosophy of Paul Feyerabend." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57 (June 2016): 9–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Gargiulo de Vázquez, María Teresa. "La noción positiva de ciencia de Paul Karl Feyerabend." Crítica (México D. F. En línea) 47, no. 141 (November 23, 2015): 61–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2015.416.

Full text

Abstract:

El pensamiento de Feyerabend ha sido objeto de múltiples y divergentes interpretaciones, entre las que parece ser unánime la inscripción de su obra dentro de las coordenadas de un escepticismo radical. Estas lecturas encuentran parcialmente sustento en su anarquismo epistemológico, el cual constituye en sí mismo una reducción al absurdo de los intentos del positivismo lógico y del racionalismo crítico de definir axiomática o metodológicamente la ciencia. En este sentido, su obra puede ser entendida, en parte, como una argumentación negativa y escéptica con respecto a aquellas nociones de ciencia. No obstante, esta hermenéutica no deja de ofrecer una visión fragmentaria y parcial de su pensamiento. El propósito de este artículo es reconstruir el itinerario intelectual a partir del cual Feyerabend va madurando su comprensión positiva de la ciencia para trascender las hermenéuticas de su obra en la clave del escepticismo.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Fadal, Kurdi. "Epistemologi Anarkisme Paul Feyerabend dalam Studi Ilmu Tafsir al-Quran." RELIGIA 18, no. 1 (March 5, 2015): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.28918/religia.v18i1.619.

Full text

Abstract:

Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang epistemologi anarkisme Paul Feyerabend dalam studi tafsir al-Qur'an. Selama ini studi tafsir al-Qur'an telah berkembang sangat pesat sejak periode formatif, afirmatif hingga transformatif. Berbagai metode dan pendekatan telah lahir mengiringi. Perkembangan itu menunjukkan bahwa studi tafsir berjalan secara dinamis. Namun, sebagian menilai tafsir al-Qur'an telah selesai pasca generasi ketiga dalam Islam. Melalui prinsip Anything Goes yang digagas Feyerabend, metode dan pendekatan apapun yang ditawarkan untuk menafsirkan al-Qur'an dapat berjalan dan "berkontestasi" secara terbuka. Satu sisi, hal ini sangat positif bagi perkembangan ilmu tafsir dalam konteks kemajuan zaman. Namun di sisi lain, anarkisme dalam bidang ini dapat menimbulkan tafsir liar yang melahirkan problem bagi kemajuan peradaban, seperti lahirnya terorisme dalam Islam yang sering disandarkan pada ayat-ayat al-Qur'an sebagai sumber justifikasinya.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Wibawa, Nazar Husain Hadi Pranata. "Epistemologi “Anything Goes” Paul Fayerabend Relevansinya dalam Pengembangan Pengetahuan." Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 21, no. 2 (December 30, 2017): 247. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/madania.v21i2.10125.

Full text

Abstract:

This article seeks to demonstrate the applicability of Paul Feyerabend's "anything goes" epistemology to the development of knowledge. This study is a literature review. Data were collected through data inventory, then analyzed and interpreted. The results of the study show that "all methodologies have limitations, and the only 'rule' that can survive is 'anything goes'". The main idea of anything goes is, first, the recommendation proposed by Feyerabend related to the discourse of anything goes, only remains as a negative freeing recommendation because it requires a certain scientific situation that is considered to restrict scientists; and is often understood simply as advocating the absence of laws, methodologies, and rules in science. Second, it actually limits the movement of scientists because it requires participation only in practices that are undefined and cannot be defined. Third, it is only a consequence of the first and second premises. In other words, anything goes, both externally and internally, contains two dimensions of freedom at once. The differences in position must be clarified to avoid confusion about the status of freedom contained in anything goes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Gargiulo, Teresa. "La doctrina de la inconmensurabilidad en Paul Feyerabend: una objeción contra una particular concepción de racionalidad científica." Areté 28, no. 1 (August 1, 2016): 61–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/arete.201601.003.

Full text

Abstract:

La inconmensurabilidad ha ocasionado innumerables controversias y debates. En estos parece ser unánime la interpretación de tal doctrina como una objeción contra la objetividad, el realismo y el progreso científico. Ahora bien, este marco hermenéutico es estrecho para poder comprender la intención de Paul Feyerabend al formular su doctrina de la inconmensurabilidad. Pues este no pretendió cuestionar nunca dichas nociones en cuanto tales sino únicamente mostrar cuán vano resulta ser el intento del neo-positivismo y del racionalismo popperiano por definirlas. En un sentido positivo sostenemos que la inconmensurabilidad en Paul Feyerabend impide o evita retomar, a la hora de definir aquellas nociones, las dialécticas propias del positivismo lógico o del racionalismo crítico. Nuestra intención en este trabajo es exponer su tesis de la inconmensurabilidad como un cuestionamiento a un modo particular de concebir la racionalidad científica y sus consecuentes nociones de objetividad, progreso y realismo científico

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Gargiulo, Teresa. "La doctrina de la inconmensurabilidad en Paul Feyerabend: una objeción contra una particular concepción de racionalidad científica." Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica 73, no. 276 (August 29, 2017): 335. http://dx.doi.org/10.14422/pen.v73.i276.y2017.006.

Full text

Abstract:

La inconmensurabilidad ha ocasionado innumerables controversias y debates. En estos parece ser unánime la interpretación de tal doctrina como una objeción contra la objetividad, el realismo y el progreso científico. Ahora bien, este marco hermenéutico es estrecho para poder comprender la intencionalidad de Paul Feyerabend al formular su doctrina de la inconmensurabilidad. Pues éste no pretendió cuestionar nunca a dichas nociones en cuanto tales sino únicamente mostrar cuán vano resulta ser el intento del neo-positivismo y del racionalismo popperiano por definirlas. En un sentido positivo sostenemos que la inconmensurabilidad en Paul Feyerabend impide o evita retomar, a la hora de definir aquellas nociones, las dialécticas propias del positivismo lógico o del racionalismo crítico. Nuestra intención en este trabajo es exponer su tesis de la inconmensurabilidad como un cuestionamiento a un modo particular de concebir la racionalidad científica y a sus consecuentes nociones de objetividad, progreso y realismo científico.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Salwia, Salwia. "Keinginan Papua untuk Memisahkan Diri dari Indonesia Kaitannya dengan Kemanusiaan." Rhizome : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Humaniora 1, no. 2 (April 25, 2024): 45–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.56393/rhizome.v1i2.458.

Full text

Abstract:

Tujuan penelitian yaitu untuk mengkaji alasan Papua ingin memisahkan diri dari Indonesia. yang dibahas dengan pemikiran Paul Feyerabend. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Studi kasus secara sederhana diartikan sebagai proses penyelidikan atau pemeriksaan secara mendalam, terperinci, dan detail pada suatu peristiwa tertentu atau khusus yang terjadi. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu bahwa sejak Papua menjadi bagian dari NKRI, sebagian penduduk Papua merasa kurang puas karena secara fakta mereka masih marginal dan miskin. Ketidakpuasan secara ekonomis itu menjadi faktor kemunculannya semangat Papua untuk memerdekan diri. Pemerintah Pusat dinilai gagal dalam membangun kesejahteraan di Papua, dan diadakannya Operasi Militer oleh Pemerintah Pusat yang bertujuan untuk mengatasi pemberontakan separatisme. Sudut pandang Paul Feyerabend menentang otoritas dan organisasi hierarkis dalam melakukan hubungan dalam menjaga taraf kemanusiaan. Banyak faktor yang membuat Papua tidak bebas untuk melakukan sesuatu dan serta ada tekanan karena perlakuan diskriminasi yang ditimbulkan dari masyarakat Indonesia itu sendiri.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Coelho, Daniel Menezes. "Contribuição ao debate entre psicanálise e ciência: Feyerabend." Ágora: Estudos em Teoria Psicanalítica 13, no. 2 (December 2010): 175–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1516-14982010000200003.

Full text

Abstract:

Trata-se de apresentar a contribuição de Paul Feyerabend ao debate entre psicanálise e ciência. A obra deste autor parece fornecer um novo horizonte de discussão, pois esvazia a pretensão de idealizar a ciência e a apresenta como atividade humana, impura, sem qualquer regra racional de funcionamento. Primeiro, faremos uma 'varredura' pelo campo atual de discussão, destacando alguns artigos que contribuem para esse debate. Seguiremos com uma crítica ao esforço de regramento epistemológico; e, por fim, apresentaremos a obra de Feyerabend, concentrando nossa atenção na leitura do célebre volume Contra o método, e no que esta obra acrescenta ao debate.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Gargiulo, Teresa. "El caso Galileo o las Paradojas de una Racionalidad Científica Positivista según Paul Karl Feyerabend." Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía, no. 47 (December 7, 2014): 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i47.662.

Full text

Abstract:

El caso Galileo significó para Feyerabend la oportunidad de mostrar metodológica e históricamente las paradojas y limitaciones de una noción positivista de ciencia. A través de este hecho paradigmático de la ciencia moderna el vienés demuestra las contradicciones que suponen los distintos intentos del neo-positivismo lógico por establecer un criterio de demarcación que defina qué es la ciencia. Da cuenta de cómo aquellos elementos frente a los cuales el positivismo lógico procura delimitar una definición negativa de ciencia, constituyen paradojalmente el seno del quehacer científico del físico. Ahora bien, esto no implica –tal como han señalado un número considerable de críticos– que Feyerabend sostenga una visión anárquica, irracionalista o relativista respecto a la ciencia. Por el contrario, en un sentido positivo se puede decir que el caso emblemático de Galileo no sólo le ofreció a Feyerabend la oportunidad de formular una argumentación negativa y escéptica respecto a aquella noción de ciencia sino que, al mismo tiempo, representó para él una ocasión para repensar la ciencia desde una perspectiva o una racionalidad científica más amplia.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!