Relevant bibliographies by topics / Paternalism / Books
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Paternalism.

Books on the topic 'Paternalism'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Paternalism.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Coons, Christian, and Michael Weber, eds. Paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139179003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer. Epistemic Paternalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137313171.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Barnett, Michael N., ed. Paternalism beyond Borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316799956.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lawes, Kim. Paternalism and Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403919618.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

1949-, Smith John David, ed. Racist southern paternalism. New York: Garland Pub., 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Glaeser, Edward L. Paternalism and psychology. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lawes, Kim. Paternalism and politics: The revival of paternalism in early nineteenth-century Britain. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Cserne, Péter. Freedom of Contract and Paternalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137000323.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Clark, Chris L. Paternalism and citizenship in communitycare. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Dept. of Social Work, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

VanDeVeer, Donald. Paternalisticintervention: The moral bounds on benevolence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Chaloemtiarana, Thak. Thailand: The politics of despotic paternalism. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Müller, Holger M. Family fims, paternalism, and labor relations. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Cadigan, Sean Thomas. Paternalism in upper Canada, 1800-1841. Ottawa, Ontario: National LIbrary of Canada, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Chaloemtiarana, Thak. Thailand, the politics of despotic paternalism. Ithaca, N.Y: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Jesurun-Clements, Nancy. Paternalism and the alleviation of poverty. Washington, DC (1818 H St., N.W., Washington 20433): Country Dept. II, Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office, World Bank, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Bonin, Hubert, and Paul Thomes, eds. Old Paternalism, New Paternalism, Post-Paternalism. Peter Lang B, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6349-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Hanna, Jason. Soft Paternalism I. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190877132.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter begins a critical examination of the distinction between hard and soft paternalism. As the hard/soft distinction is typically drawn, hard paternalism involves intervention in voluntary self-regarding choices, while soft paternalism involves intervention in nonvoluntary self-regarding choices. This chapter focuses on the ignorance exception, according to which it is easier to justify intervention in ill-informed choices than in otherwise comparable but informed choices. The central argument is that the ignorance exception faces serious difficulties when applied to decision-makers who are responsible for their own ignorance. It is also argued that this problem may have its source in anti-paternalists’ failure to distinguish the claim that one has voluntarily assumed a risk from the claim that one has voluntarily brought about a certain outcome. If the ignorance exception cannot be adequately defended, the chapter concludes, most anti-paternalist views will have unsettling implications.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Cullity, Garrett. Paternalism. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807841.003.0010.

Full text
Abstract:
Someone who treats you paternalistically restricts your self-expression in order to promote your welfare. The simplest kind of pluralist theory treats this as a case in which competing reasons of respect and concern must be balanced. This chapter presents a more nuanced view. We have a right to self-determination, but this right is not basic: its derivational sources include reasons of concern and respect; and it is by reference to those more fundamental reasons that we can explain what that right does and does not protect. Moreover, the right to self-determination has a context-undermining function. Although there can be reasons for infringing it, the welfare of the right-bearer is not a reason for doing so.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Midtgaard, Søren Flinch. Paternalism. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.201.

Full text
Abstract:
In the standard view, A acts paternalistically toward B if and only if: (i) A restricts B’s liberty, (ii) A acts against B’s will, (iii) A acts for B’s own good. For example, the state may tax or prohibit smoking in the interest of citizens’ health in circumstances in which such measures are resisted by them or some of them. Telling counterexamples have been produced to each of these conditions. In the revised view, A acts paternalistically toward B if and only if: (i) A acts so as to influence B by the use of means other than rational persuasion; (ii) A does not regard B’s will as structurally decisive (i.e., A takes the prevention of voluntary self-regarding harm to constitute a reason for influencing B); (iii) A does so for B’s good or to affect matters within B’s legitimate sphere of control; (iv) A’s act cannot be justified without counting its beneficial effects on B in its favor. The wrongness of paternalism lies in the way in which a paternalistic act by A toward B infringes B’s autonomy: A does not consider B’s will authoritative in determining how A should treat B in B’s self-regarding matters―A subjects B’s will to his in this sense. Hard paternalism as thus understood should be distinguished from soft paternalism or anti-paternalism. According to the latter, the prevention of voluntary self-regarding harm is never a good reason for interference. The latter is justifiable only to prevent involuntary self-regarding harm―harm pertaining to acts that are not his or do not represent his values or preferences. Hard paternalism may, pace what soft paternalism or anti-paternalism claims, sometimes be justifiable. This is particularly so when the voluntary self-regarding harm involved is significant and the infringement of liberty required to prevent it limited or acceptable given the harm at stake. The question of when a good or an advantage is profound and when an infringement of liberty is limited is, however, difficult and worthy of further investigation. Paternalistic justifications should be distinguished from other liberty-limiting principles. That is, they should, first, be distinguished from moral paternalism focusing on improving the person’s moral character and hence his moral well-being or on making the person better (as opposed to the improvement of the person’s physical and psychological condition focused on by ordinary or welfare paternalism). Second, it should be distinguished from legal moralism concerned with barring conduct that is intrinsically morally bad (that is, bad for reasons independent of how it affects people’s character or their physical or psychological condition).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Paternalism. Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, Peter, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Old Paternalism, New Paternalism, Post-Paternalism : (19th - 21st Centuries). Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, Peter, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Old Paternalism, New Paternalism, Post Paternalism: 19th-21st Centuries. Belgium: P.I.E. Peter lang, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Bonin, Hubert, and Paul Thomes. Old Paternalism, New Paternalism, Post-Paternalism : (19th-21st Centuries). Lang AG International Academic Publishers, Peter, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Old Paternalism, New Paternalism, Post-Paternalism: (19th - 21st Centuries). Lang Publishing, Incorporated, Peter, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Hanna, Jason. Pro-Paternalism. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190877132.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The central aim of this chapter is to set out the pro-paternalist view defended in the remainder of the book. According to pro-paternalism, it is always a valid reason in favor of intervening in someone’s affairs that doing so would advance some of her interests, and such intervention is justified when, all things considered, it would serve the target’s best interest without wronging anyone else. This view is contrasted with its anti-paternalist competitors. The contrast between these views suggests that the debate over paternalism is most fundamentally a debate about the weight and availability of a certain sort of rationale for intervention. Having clarified the terms of the debate over paternalism, the chapter concludes by distinguishing among several different types of intervention and briefly outlining the chapters to follow.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Hanna, Jason. Soft Paternalism II. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190877132.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter continues the examination of the hard paternalism/soft paternalism distinction begun in chapter 6. It focuses on the impairment exception. According to the impairment exception, it is easier to justify intervention in imprudent and impaired choices, such as those affected by temporary emotional distress, than it is to justify intervention in comparably imprudent but unimpaired self-regarding choices. In order to defend this view, one must offer an account of impairment that yields intuitively plausible implications about cases, and one must also show that this account of impairment is morally relevant. It is argued that soft paternalists have failed to complete either of these tasks. The chapter focuses on Joel Feinberg’s notion of voluntariness and on attempts to defend the hard/soft distinction by appeal to some notion of instrumental rationality. It concludes that the hard/soft distinction, and the many anti-paternalist views that rely on it, ought to be rejected.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Husak, Douglas N. Legal Paternalism. Edited by Hugh LaFollette. Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199284238.003.0016.

Full text
Abstract:
This article's central interest is to examine the special philosophical difficulties that arise in attempts to think about paternalism in legal contexts. Most moral philosophers have focused on personal relationships in their efforts to understand both the nature and the justification of paternalism. That is, they have endeavoured to identify the conditions under which what they define as paternalism might be justified in situations in which one person (for example, a parent, a doctor, or a friend) interacts with another person (for example, a child, a patient, or a friend). The article is largely concerned with the problems that inhere in efforts to apply to the domain of law any theories about paternalism that might be derived from these personal contexts. It proposes tentative solutions to several of these problems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

New, Bill, Julian Le Grand, and Grand Le. Government Paternalism. Princeton University Press, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Epistemic Paternalism. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Kronke, Christoph. Governmental Paternalism. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Bullock, Emma. Moral Paternalism and Neurointerventions. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198758617.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
A natural approach to justifying the coercive administration of morally enhancing neurointerventions is to appeal to a principle of moral paternalism. This chapter outlines the factors that need to be taken into account in order for a principle of moral paternalism to morally justify coercively administering neurointerventions. First, the author argues that the moral paternalist must take special care to ensure that the interventions will improve moral character. Second, she outlines the potential costs that the moral paternalist needs to address before a moral paternalistic interference is justified. The author argues that whilst the moral paternalistic administration of a neurointervention may have more kinds of cost to consider than other forms of moral paternalistic interference, this does not mean that such interventions cannot be justified under the principle.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Straube, Christian. After Corporate Paternalism. Berghahn Books, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781800731349.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Barnett, Michael N. Paternalism Beyond Borders. Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Claeys, Gregory. Mill and Paternalism. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Mill and Paternalism. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Menace of Paternalism. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Claeys, Gregory. Mill and Paternalism. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Claeys, Gregory. Mill and Paternalism. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Barnett, Michael N. Paternalism Beyond Borders. Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Barnett, Michael N. Paternalism Beyond Borders. Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Kahn, Otto H. Menace of Paternalism. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Paternalism Beyond Borders. Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Hanna, Jason. Paternalism and Moderate Deontology. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190877132.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter attempts to situate pro-paternalism within a moderate deontological moral theory. According to moderate deontologists such as Judith Jarvis Thomson, moral rights have thresholds beyond which they can be permissibly infringed. According to one plausible way of developing this view, a right has a threshold of zero when its infringement would benefit the right-bearer. If so, then beneficial paternalistic intervention may be permissible even if it infringes rights. After developing this argument, the chapter considers several possible anti-paternalist replies, including the suggestion that rights thresholds are sensitive to the value of autonomy. It is argued that each reply either has implausible implications or is unlikely to support common anti-paternalist judgments about cases.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Michael, Weber, and Christian Coons. Paternalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Otteson, James R. Adam Smith’s Libertarian Paternalism. Edited by David Schmidtz and Carmen E. Pavel. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199989423.013.5.

Full text
Abstract:
Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein argue for “libertarian paternalism,” defined as the strategy to devise policy that will “maintain or increase freedom of choice” and at the same time “influence people’s behavior in order to make their lives longer, healthier, and better”. These two goals are often in conflict, and striking the right balance between them has proved difficult in both theory and practice. Where does Adam Smith fall in this debate? This chapter argues that Smith developed his own version of “libertarian paternalism.” It differs in important ways from that of Thaler and Sunstein, but it shares with them an attempt to balance respect for individual autonomy with a desire to help people lead better lives. Smith’s position accommodates the importance of both liberty and paternalism in enabling individuals to construct lives worth living, while avoiding some of the problems that have beset more recent versions of libertarian paternalism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Flanigan, Jessica. Paternalism and Public Health. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190684549.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Since medical paternalism is wrong in the clinical context, it should be rejected in public policy as well. But even if paternalistic public health policies were permissible, it is not clear that prohibitive pharmaceutical regulations are necessary to promote public health. Prohibitions could undermine health in some cases, for example, if prescription requirements make patients more deferential to physicians and tolerant of medical risks. Premarket testing requirements cause people to suffer and die waiting for new drugs to get approved, and they discourage new drug development. This is not to say that regulation serves no purpose. Pharmaceutical regulators provide a valuable pubic good by overseeing testing for new drugs and by certifying drugs that they deem generally safe and effective. But the benefits of regulation do not require that the regulations be prohibitive, and prohibitive regulations not only violate patients’ rights, they may also cost lives.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Hayry, Heta. Limits of Medical Paternalism. Taylor & Francis Group, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Hyry, Heta. Limits of Medical Paternalism. Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

H¨ayry, Heta. Limits of Medical Paternalism. Routledge, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Häyry, Heta. Limits of Medical Paternalism. Taylor & Francis Group, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Paternalism' for other source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography