Relevant bibliographies by topics / Patent / Journal articles
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Patent.

Journal articles on the topic 'Patent'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 28 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Patent.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Klee, Maurice. "A Presidential Patent [Patents." IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 29, no. 1 (January 2010): 98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/memb.2009.935467.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hall, B. H. "Patents and patent policy." Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23, no. 4 (December 1, 2007): 568–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm037.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ardani, Alif Muhammad. "Penghapusan Paten Terdaftar di Indonesia: Perkembangan dan Penyebabnya." Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (October 28, 2019): 147–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.1.147-168.

Full text
Abstract:
This article discusses the cancellation or revocation of patents registered in Indonesia and their causes. Revocation or cancellation of a patent is a form of law enforcement of patents that have been registered, because the invention given a patent is not eligible for a patent or the patent owner does not carry out his obligations. With a revocation, the exclusive right of the inventor or patent holder to use his invention will be lost. The results showed, first, the revocation of patents so far was dominated by patents and not simple patents, and most of them were from abroad. However, this fact does not mean that domestic patents are far more applicable or more compliant with statutory provisions, but it must also be related that the number of patents registered in Indonesia so far is mostly from abroad. Second, the revocation of patents was dominated by patent holders who do not carry out patent maintenance fees. This is because patents that have been registered are considered unproductive so it is difficult to apply in the industry; research development that requires a large enough cost so that it results in accumulation of patent maintenance payments; and the transition of provisions regarding the cost and maintenance period of patents from the old Patent Law (2001) to the new Law (2016) which is relatively unknown. Abstrak Artikel ini membahas perkembangan pembatalan atau penghapusan paten terdaftar di Indonesia beserta faktor yang menyebabkannya. Penghapusan atau pembatalan paten merupakan suatu bentuk penegakan hukum terhadap paten yang sudah terdaftar, disebabkan invensi yang diberi paten tidak layak mendapatkan paten atau pemilik paten tidak melaksanakan kewajibannya. Dengan pembatalan atau penghapusan, maka hak eksklusif inventor atau pemegang paten untuk menggunakan invensinya akan menjadi hilang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama, pembatalan atau penghapusan paten terdaftar sejauh ini didominasi pada paten dan bukan paten sederhana, dan sebagian besar berasal dari luar negeri. Namun demikian fakta ini tidak berarti bahwa paten dalam negeri jauh lebih aplikatif atau lebih mematuhi ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan, melainkan juga harus dikaitkan bahwa jumlah paten terdaftar di Indonesia sejauh ini memang sebagian besar berasal dari luar negeri. Kedua, penghapusan paten terdaftar didominasi oleh pemegang paten yang tidak melakukan biaya pemeliharaan paten. Hal ini bisa jadi disebabkan oleh paten yang telah terdaftar dinilai tidak produktif sehingga sulit diterapkan dalam industri; pengembangan riset yang memerlukan biaya yang cukup besar sehingga mengakibatkan akumulasi pembayaran pemeliharaan paten; dan peralihan ketentuan mengenai biaya dan masa pemeliharaan paten dari UU Paten lama (Tahun 2001) ke UU baru (Tahun 2016) yang relatif belum dipahami.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Novianti, Novianti. "PELINDUNGAN PATEN MELALUI PATENT COOPERATION TREATYDAN REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PATENT PROTECTION THROUGH PATENT COOPERATION TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY)." Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 8, no. 2 (November 1, 2017): 289–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v8i2.1071.

Full text
Abstract:
The development of science and technology, especially the emergence of new inventions, has reduced the limits of space and time. In terms of IPR, it challenges us to protect our IPR under IPR law, both at the national level and international level. However, given the fact that the patent issue was raised locally in each country, it’s difficult to uniformize the management and protection of IPR among countries. The problem being raised is that the patent issue is a local issue which is closely intertwined with national sovereignty. Fortunately, there have been efforts to make a technologically-based system in order to integrate the management and protection of IPR at the international level. The system has been successfully made along with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Regulations Under the PCT (RUP). All countries need to ratify them to protect the IPR of their citizens at the international level. This research concerns with the arrangement and implementation of patent protection through PCT and RUP. This research concludes that the international conventions have been made to accommodate and guarantee the legal aspect of the Treaty, such as Trips, PCT and WIPO. As a country which has ratified the Treaty, Indonesia has issued Presidential Decree No. 16 of 1997 which is finalized into Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents (Article 33), stating that applications may be filed under a Patent Cooperation Treaty. This research also points out that although it’s believed that all countries will benefit from PCT and RUP, PCT has not attracted significant numbers of applicants. That means, there is still much work to be done. AbstrakPerkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi, dengan munculnya invensi-invensi baru, menyebabkan batasan ruang dan waktu semakin menipis. Dalam kaitannya dengan IPR, perkembangan tersebut menjadi tantangan untuk mewujudkan perlindungan HKI khususnya paten, baik dalam konteks nasional maupun internasional. Akan tetapi, persoalannya selama ini, sangat sulit melakukan penyeragaman pengaturan perlindungan paten antara satu negara dan negara-negara lainnya. Tiap-tiap negara menerapkan aturan pengelolaan dan pelindungan patennya sendiri dengan alasan bahwa paten merupakan suatu hak eksklusif yang diberikan oleh suatu negara dan karenanya segala hal yang terkait dengan pengelolaannya tidak bisa tidak menyentuh masalah kedaulatan suatu negara. Perkembangan global, terutama perkembangan iptek, memudahkan penyeragaman pengaturan paten secara internasional sekaligus memberikan pelindungan hukum terhadapnya. Hal itu tampak pada tersedianya suatu sistem yang terintegrasi, yang dapat diberlakukan secara seragam di semua negara yang meratifikasinya, yaitu Patent Cooperation Treaty(PCT) and Regulations Under the PCT. Masalah yang menjadi fokus tulisan ini adalah bagaimana pengaturan pelindungan paten melalui PCT dan bagaimana penerapan pelindungan paten melalui PCT. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah pengaturan pelindungan paten melalui PCT terdapat dalam beberapa konvensi internasional, antara lain pengaturan Trip’s, PCT, dan WIPO. Dalam hukum nasional, PCT telah diratifikasi dengan Keppres No. 16 Tahun 1997 dan diatur dalam Pasal 33 UU No. 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten, yang menyatakan bahwa permohonan dapat diajukan berdasarkan Traktat Kerja Sama Paten. Dalam penerapannya, permohonan dan pelindungan paten melalui PCT belum menunjukkan perkembangan yang cukup signifikan dan masih banyak ditemukan kendala.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Thompson, Sandra P. "Patent review: Recent patents & patent applications related to biofuels development." Industrial Biotechnology 5, no. 2 (June 2009): 90–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ind.2009.5.090.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

MacCord, Art. "IEEE-USA Opposes Patent Office Review of Issued Patents [Patent Reviews]." IEEE Power Electronics Magazine 4, no. 4 (December 2017): 65–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mpel.2017.2759941.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

MacCord, Art. "Exhaustion of Patents [Patent Reviews]." IEEE Power Electronics Magazine 3, no. 2 (June 2016): 16–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mpel.2016.2551806.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Sancho, Carmen, and Ismael Arinas Pellón. "How patent can patents be?" Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9, no. 1 (July 6, 2011): 179–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.09san.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper examines the import of figurative language (specifically of conceptual and grammatical metaphors) in the discourse of engineering patents, a genre hardly researched for stylistic and pedagogical purposes and traditionally regarded as highly impersonal. To that end, a corpus of over 300 US electro-mechanical patents has been analysed with the aid of a concordancing tool and applying a threefold convergent framework that gathers the metafunctions of Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday, 1978, 1985), the Applied Linguistic Approach to Metaphor (Low, 2008) and the Metadiscursive Approach (Hyland, 2000, 2005). Findings reveal a complex network of metaphorical schemata, most non-deliberate, which constitute a tripartite choice dependent on the legal culture, the discipline and, to a lesser extent, on the authorial voice. It also binds patent writers into a community of practice (Wenger, 1998) sharing a phraseological repertoire basically acquired by imitation and whose creative and confident use requires explicit instruction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lichtman, Doug. "Patient Patents: Can Certain Types of Patent Litigation Be Beneficially Delayed?" Journal of Legal Studies 46, no. 2 (June 2017): 427–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/695407.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Storz, Ulrich. "Of patents and patent disputes: The TNFα patent files. Part 1: Humira." Human Antibodies 25, no. 1-2 (February 20, 2017): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/hab-160300.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Horstmann, Ignatius, Glenn M. MacDonald, and Alan Slivinski. "Patents as Information Transfer Mechanisms: To Patent or (Maybe) Not to Patent." Journal of Political Economy 93, no. 5 (October 1985): 837–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261338.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Hwang, Jung-Tae, Byung-Keun Kim, and Eui-Seob Jeong. "Patent Value and Survival of Patents." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7, no. 2 (April 26, 2021): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020119.

Full text
Abstract:
This study investigated the effect of patent value on the renewal (survival) of patents. The private value of patents can be one of the main pillars sustaining a firm’s value, and the estimation of the value may contribute to the strategic management of firms. The current study aimed to confirm the recent research findings with survival analysis, focusing on the more homogeneous patent data samples. In this study, a dataset is constructed from a cohort of 6646 patents from the 1996 and 1997 application years, using patent data from the European Patent Office (EPO). We found that the family size and non-patent backward citations exhibited profound impacts on patent survival. This result is in line with numerous studies, indicating the positive impact of science linkages in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical fields. It was also found that the effect of the ex-post indicator is not as strong as the ex-ante indicators, like traditional family size and backward citations. In short, the family size matters most for the survival of patents, according to the current research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Dandy Hediyanto, Fahnizar, Kholis Raisah, and Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja. "Kendala Regulasi Kewajiban Pemegang Paten oleh Investor Asing di Indonesia." Notarius 14, no. 1 (May 7, 2021): 616–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i1.39137.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe Obligations of patent holders based on Article 20 as regulated in Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning patents are still relatively problematic. The factors that hinder the process of patent implementation in Indonesia, both from patent holders and/or from the Indonesian government, are a separate problem for patent holders who are foreign citizens. This study uses a normative juridical method, using secondary data. The results of the study conclude that the Patent Law Number 13 of 2016 creates problems, especially for inventors from abroad. So that the Indonesian Government issued Permenkumham Number 30 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Granting Compulsory Patent Licenses as a solution to this problem through the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, where patent holders can submit applications for postponement of patent implementation to the Minister along with the background for the delay, in the case of patent holders has not been able to apply his patent in Indonesia after the patent application has been approved. Keywords: Obligations of Patent Holder; Patent Regulations; Foreign Investor ABSTRAKKewajiban pemegang paten berdasarkan Pasal 20 sebagaimana diatur pada Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten masih relatif mengundang permasalahan. Faktor yang menghalangi untuk proses implementasi paten di Indonesia baik yang berasal dari pemegang paten dan/atau dari pemerintah Indonesia, menjadi permasalahan tersendiri bagi pemegang paten yang merupakan Warga Negara Asing. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Undang-Undang Paten Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 menimbulkan permasalahan terutama untuk investor dari luar negeri. Sehingga Pemerintah Indonesia mengeluarkan Permenkumham Nomor 30 Tahun 2019 tentang Tata Cara Pemberian Lisensi-Wajib Paten sebagai solusi atas permasalahan tersebut melalui Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, dimana Pemegang paten dapat menyampaikan permohonan penundaan pelaksanaan paten kepada Menteri beserta latar belakang atas penundaan tersebut, dalam hal pemegang paten belum mampu untuk menerapkan patennya di Indonesia setelah permohonan paten tersebut disetujui. Kata Kunci: Kewajiban Pemegang Paten; Regulasi Paten; Investor Asing
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Riley, Fran, and Alexander Arroyo. "Diagnosing patent urachus in pediatric patient." Visual Journal of Emergency Medicine 26 (January 2022): 101174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visj.2021.101174.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Grüne, S., and E. Treher. "A blue patient with patent blue." Endoscopy 42, S 02 (January 2010): E11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1215412.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

YAMASHITA, Yoshiyuki. "Text mining technology for patent analysis and patent search : Patent search and patent analysis service Patent Integration." Journal of Information Processing and Management 52, no. 10 (2010): 581–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.52.581.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Bambang Ribowo, Mochammad, and Kholis Raisah. "PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PATEN SEDERHANA DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PATEN DI INDONESIA (STUDI KOMPARASI DENGAN SISTEM HUKUM PATEN DI NEGARA CHINA)." NOTARIUS 12, no. 1 (June 11, 2019): 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i1.23761.

Full text
Abstract:
This study discusses the comparison of legal protection against simple patents in the patent law system in Indonesia. The normative juridical research method with a descriptive approach is supported by a theoretical approach, namely by reviewing and reviewing the provisions of Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents with legal theory to compare legal protection against simple patents in the patent law system in Indonesia. The results of the study show that the comparison of patent regulations in Indonesia and in China has several differences in the mechanisms and principles of legal protection that are seen in differences in giving and there are similarities in the standards of regulation that still adhere to the principles in the WTO / TRIPs Agreement. In resolving simple patent rights disputes, important indicators of violations are related to (1) Identification of inventions in claims supported by simple patent descriptions, (2) identification of comparative inventions that exist before the date of receipt; and (3) anticipation of previous inventions against suspected inventions that have not been made recently for each unit of Claim from the Patent to be canceled, so that if there is a patent case in the future it can at least be a picture of its completion Keywords: Simple Patent, Comparison of Legal Protection, Dispute Resolution. Abstrak Penelitian ini membahas tentang perbandingan perlindungan hukum terhadap paten sederhana dalam sistem hukum paten di indonesia. metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang bersifat deskriptif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan yang didukung dengan pendekatan teori, yaitu dengan menelaah dan mengkaji ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten dengan teori hukum untuk mengetahui perbandingan perlindungan hukum terhadap paten sederhana dalam sistem hukum paten di indonesia. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbandingan perngaturan paten di Indonesia dan di negara china terdapat beberapa perbedaan mekanisme dan prinsip perlindungan hukum yang terlihat pada perbedaan pemberian serta terdapat persamaan dalam standar pengaturan yang tetap menganut prinsip dalam WTO/TRIPs Agreement. Dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak paten sederhana indikator pelanggaran yang penting diketahui adalah berkaitan dengan (1) Identifikasi invensi dalam klaim yang didukung deskripsi paten sederhana, (2) identifikasi invensi pembanding yang ada sebelum tanggal penerimaan; dan (3) antisipasi invensi terdahulu terhadap invensi yang disangka tidak baru yang dilakukan atas setiap satuan Klaim dari Paten yang hendak dibatalkan, sehingga apabila terdapat perkara paten dikemudian hari setidaknya dapat menjadi gambaran dalam penyelesaiannya.. Kata kunci: Paten Sederhana, Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum, Penyelesaian Sengketa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Widyanti, Kartika Ira, and Budi Santoso. "Urgensi Pengimplementasian Paten Intenasional Terhadap Pendaftaran Paten Sederhana di Indonesia." Notarius 16, no. 1 (June 28, 2021): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i1.38438.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis study discusses about the extent to which legal protection of the validity of PT Karta Indonesia Global's simple patent certificate based on the Supreme Court decision Number 802 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2019. Juridical normative research methods with qualitative data analysis methods in order to review cases based on the regulations relating to Patents. The results showed that the implementation of patent protection for signs and advertising boxes on motorbikes has not been effective and the Supreme Court Decision No. 802 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2019 which contains the rejection of the plaintiff's petition is correct, because in the application of the law, the Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 61/Pdt.Sus-Paten/2018/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The implementation of patents in Indonesia for simple patents should begin to apply Worldwide Global Patents so that the implementation of simple patent protection is more effective and there are no more similar disputes.Keywords: intelectual property rights; patent; legal protection; dispute resolutionAbstrakPenelitian ini membahas tentang sejauh mana perlindungan hukum terhadap keabsahan sertifikat paten sederhana milik PT Karta Indonesia Global berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 802 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2019. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan metode analisis data kualitatif dalam rangka meninjau kasus berdasarkan peraturan-peraturan yang berkaitan dengan Paten. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan perlindungan paten terhadap Papan dan Kotak Iklan pada Sepeda Motor belum berjalan secara efektif dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 802 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2019 yang berisi penolakan terhadap permohonan penggugat sudah tepat, karena dalam penerapan hukumnya telah mempertimbangkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat No. 61/Pdt.Sus-Paten/2018/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Implementasi paten di Indonesia untuk paten sederhana sebaiknya mulai menerapkan Worldwide Global Patent agar pelaksanaan perlindungan paten sederhana lebih efektif dan tidak terjadi lagi sengketa yang serupa.Kata kunci: HaKI; paten; perlindungan hukum; penyelesaian sengketa
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Marco, Alan C., Joshua D. Sarnoff, and Charles A. W. deGrazia. "Patent claims and patent scope." Research Policy 48, no. 9 (November 2019): 103790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.014.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Androshchuk, H. O., and L. I. Rabotiahova. "Eu patent system: unitary patent and patent court (part 1)." Science, technologies, innovation, no. 2(30) (2024): 3–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2024-2-01.

Full text
Abstract:
The article examines the organizational, economic and legal aspects of the creation of a unified patent system of the EU, its role and place in the regional patent system, the stimulation of innovation, open to all European states. The article aimed at the issuance of a classic European patent, the procedures for obtaining a unified patent, organizational and economic advantages are analyzed (cost savings, compensation scheme) and possible disadvantages of a unified patent system for national offices. The unified patent system of the EU has become operational, a single patent is issued with a single effect on the territory of the EU member states that participate in the creation of a unified patent protection.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Song, Chie Hoon. "Creating commercial value from patents: the interplay between patent protection and patent information management." Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst 5, no. 6 (November 2016): 361–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4155/ppa-2016-0030.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

ARIGA, Yasuhiro, and Hiroki ARAI. "Trend analysis by patent information. Patents of US Class 705 through the "Patent Map"." Journal of Information Processing and Management 43, no. 11 (2001): 965–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.43.965.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Teska, Kirk. "Patent Trolls." Mechanical Engineering 133, no. 08 (August 1, 2011): 35–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2011-aug-2.

Full text
Abstract:
This article elaborates the practice of patent trolls. The maligned patent trolls have never been clearly defined and thus can be difficult to handle. The earliest trolls were first called “submariners.” The typical profile was someone who had numerous patent filings for futuristic ideas (futuristic at the time, anyway), who did not actually manufacture or sell anything, and who purposefully delayed letting the patents issue (often for twenty years or more) until the marketplace had fully embraced the technology mentioned in the patent filings. Then these submariners surfaced, allowed their patents to issue, and sued or threatened to sue many of the businesses in an entire industry often seeking a small percentage of a large company’s entire yearly revenue. A change in the patent laws put an end to these submariners: patents, beginning in 1995, now have a life of 20 years from the date of the application (instead of 17 years from issuance of the patent), meaning the submarining tactic of keeping a patent application pending eats up the life of any resulting patent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Kasyanov, R. A., and I. M. Yazberdiev. "To the 50th Anniversary of the European Patent Convention (1973–2023)." Moscow Journal of International Law, no. 1 (May 15, 2024): 44–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2024-1-44-56.

Full text
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION. This paper reflects historical overview of long-standing emergence of mechanisms of judicial protections of patent rights conferred by European patens which begun even in 1950-s and ended with start of operations of the Unified Patent Court in 2023. The paper demonstrates that the establishment of the similar mechanism within the Eurasian Patent Organization or Eurasian Economic Union may require different approaches because of possible centralization of industrial property protection under Eurasian Patent Organization.METHODS AND MATERIALS. The research materials for this paper are scientific works of foreign and Russian scientists and officials of the European Patent Office and the Eurasian Patent Office, legal acts of international and regional levels and drafts thereof. Methodological basis of this research are general and special scientific methods.RESEARCH RESULTS. This paper suggests periodization in emergence and evolution of dispute resolution mechanisms for European patents, reveals rationales for establishment of the unified patent judiciary in Europe and outlines directions for further research of prospects of creation of the similar mechanism in the Eurasian region. Some findings made in this article may facilitate the growth of such researches.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. European Union (EU) accumulated broad experience in establishment of the dispute resolution mechanisms for European patents. Due to uniqueness the Unified Patent Court is of great interest when researching prospect of improvements of the patent judiciary and quasi-judicial mechanisms under the Eurasian Patent Convention. However, trends of developments of the Eurasian Patent Organization and possible centralization of the regional protection of industrial property may testify that a Eurasian analogue of the Unified Patent Court would have a different institutional form.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Mogee, Mary Ellen, and Richard G. Kolar. "Patent citation analysis of Allergan pharmaceutical patents." Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 8, no. 10 (October 1998): 1323–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/13543776.8.10.1323.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

De Luca, Carmela, and Anastassia Trifonova. "Patent disclosure requirements for therapeutic antibody patents." Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 27, no. 8 (March 9, 2017): 867–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2017.1296950.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Kenrick, M. "Terrell on Patents--a patent attorney's perspective." Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 1, no. 8 (May 22, 2006): 553–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpl081.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Cook-Deegan, Robert. "CRISPR Patents: Aspiring to Coherent Patent Policy." American Journal of Bioethics 18, no. 12 (December 2, 2018): 51–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1533739.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Rai, Arti K. "Locating Gene Patents within the Patent System." American Journal of Bioethics 2, no. 3 (September 1, 2002): 18–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/152651602760250011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

LANGINIER, CORINNE. "PATENT POOL FORMATION AND SCOPE OF PATENTS." Economic Inquiry 49, no. 4 (December 7, 2009): 1070–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00252.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Tietz, Jonathan. "The Unified Patent Court and Patent Trolls in Europe." Michigan Technology Law Review, no. 25.2 (2019): 303. http://dx.doi.org/10.36645/mtlr.25.2.unified.

Full text
Abstract:
Healthy organisms inevitably produce cancer cells, and vibrant patent systems inevitably let bad patents slip through. These patents are harnessed by entities that leverage the uncertainty and expense of litigation to extract licenses from technological practitioners. Postissuance patent review (PIPR) has emerged as an invaluable errorcorrecting mechanism to prevent the socially harmful assertion of improperly issued patents. The United States, with the America Invents Act, established a new system for PIPR, expanding administrative routes to curtail bad patents. Europe is going a step further with the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA). The UPCA enables a lowcost patent revocation action on a broad range of grounds and with a relaxed standing requirement. But this is an opt-in system with a loser-pays fee-shifting arrangement. Thus, although the structure of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) appears to be set up to facilitate efficient PIPR, the disincentives for opting in suggest that the UPC will be a less effective troll-fighting vehicle than expected. Indeed, patent trolls may simply opt for national patent systems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Arai, Koki. "Patent Quality and Pro-patent Policy." Journal of technology management & innovation 5, no. 4 (December 2010): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242010000400001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Beukel, Karin. "How patent experts create patent breadth." International Journal of Intellectual Property Management 9, no. 2 (2019): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijipm.2019.100202.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Beukel, Karin. "How patent experts create patent breadth." International Journal of Intellectual Property Management 9, no. 2 (2019): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijipm.2019.10021958.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

IINO, Shigeru, Akira ITO, Akihiro KOBAYASHI, and Yasushi YAMADA. "Patent Management and Patent Information(12)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 12 (1986): 1078–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.1078.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

KOBAYASHI, Akihiro, Shigeru IINO, Yoshiyuki KUSAKA, Mitsuaki KOBIKI, and Hideaki TAKENOUCHI. "Patent Management and Patent Information (2)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 2 (1985): 150–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.150.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

KIHARA, Yoshitake, Yasushi YAMADA, Toshihiko OGATA, Norihiko MAEDA, and Shinji MATSUURA. "Patent Management and Patent Information(3)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 3 (1985): 247–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.247.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

TOYOHARA, Kunio, Akihiro KOBAYASHI, Nobuo FUJIMOTO, Norihiko MAETA, and Ichiro HORIKAWA. "Patent Management and Patent Information(4)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 4 (1985): 339–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.339.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

ITOH, Akira, Kyouichi SAITOH, Shinji MATSUURA, Yukio HOKURA, and Hideaki TAKENOUCHI. "Patent Management and Patent Information(5)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 5 (1985): 411–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.411.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

IINO, Shigeru, Yasushi YAMADA, Yukio HOKURA, and Toshihiko OGATA. "Patent Management and Patent Information(6)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 6 (1985): 520–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.520.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

ITO, Akira, Hiroo OBARA, Nobuo FUJIMOTO, and Yoshifumi ISHIKAWA. "Patent Management and Patent Information (1)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 1 (1985): 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.59.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

OBARA, Hiroo, Kunio TOYOHARA, and Yoshifumi ISHIKAWA. "Patent Management and Patent Information(7)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 7 (1985): 623–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.623.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

López-Haldón, José, Francisco López-Pardo, María J. Rodríguez-Puras, and Ángel Martínez-Martínez. "Patent Foramen Ovale Not So Patent." Echocardiography 26, no. 4 (April 2009): 465–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00800.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Beukel, Karin. "How patent experts create patent breadth." Academy of Management Proceedings 2014, no. 1 (January 2014): 13575. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.13575abstract.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

MacCord, Art. "A successful software patent [Patent Reviews]." IEEE Power Electronics Magazine 3, no. 3 (September 2016): 12–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mpel.2016.2585471.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

MacCord, Art. "An Unsuccessful Software Patent [Patent Reviews]." IEEE Power Electronics Magazine 3, no. 4 (December 2016): 14–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mpel.2016.2614907.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

YAMADA, Yasushi, Mitsuaki KOBIKI, and Nobuo FUJIMOTO. "Patent Management and Patent Information(8)." Journal of Information Processing and Management 28, no. 8 (1985): 715–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.28.715.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

"Patente / Patent Index." Tenside Surfactants Detergents 23, no. 6 (December 1, 1986): 364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tsd-1986-230631.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Kamil, Abir Rafa. "IMPLEMENTATION OF PATENT AND TRANSFER OF PATENT RIGHTS ACCORDING TO INDONESIAN PATENT LAW." JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) 6, no. 1 (January 8, 2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i1.2801.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIndonesia as a member of the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) is obliged to comply with the provisions stipulated in the Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (“TRIPs Agreement”) especially regarding Patents; therefore, the Government of Indonesia regulates the provisions regarding Patents by Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patent which has been amended through Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation (“Indonesia Patent Law”). Article 20 of Indonesian Patent Law regulates that “the implementation of Patents must be implemented in Indonesia which can be done by making, importing, and licensing.”. Related to the protection of patent rights granted, the state also hopes to transfer technology from Patent Holders; thus, their inventions can be produced and used without paying royalties to Patent Holders. However, the provisions regulated by the Government of Indonesia stipulate that the implementation of Patent can be carried out by importing, which will result in no transfer of technology from the Patent Holders to the state; thus, it will be detrimental to Indonesia. Therefore this paper will examine and explain the impact of applying Article 20 of the Indonesian Patent Law, especially regarding the implementation of Patent and transfer of Patent Rights.AbstrakIndonesia sebagai anggota World Trade Organization (“WTO”) wajib memenuhi ketentuan yang ditetapkan dalam Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rigths Agreement (“TRIPs Agreement”) terutama mengenai Paten, oleh karena itu, Pemerintah Indonesia mengatur ketentuan mengenai Patent melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten yang telah diubah melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja (“UU Paten Indonesia”). Pasal 20 UU Paten Indonesia mengatur bahwa “implementasi Paten harus dilaksanakan di Indonesia yang dapat dilakukan dengan membuat, mengimpor, dan lisensi.”. Pada dasarnya terkait dengan perlindungan Hak Paten yang diberikan, negara juga berharap untuk terjadinya peralihan teknologi dari Pemegang Paten sehingga invensi mereka dapat diproduksi dan digunakan tanpa harus membayar royalty kepada Pemegang Paten. Namun, ketentuan yang diatur oleh Pemerintah Indonesia menetapkan bahwa implementasi Paten dapat dilakukan dengan importasi yang mana hal tersebut tidak akan menghasilkan peralihan teknologi dari Pemegang Paten kepada negara sehingga akan merugikan Indonesia. Oleh karena itu paper ini akan mengkaji dan menjelaskan dampak penerapan Pasal 20 UU Paten Indonesia khususnya mengenai implementasi Paten dan transfer Hak Patent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Kamil, Abir Rafa. "IMPLEMENTATION OF PATENT AND TRANSFER OF PATENT RIGHTS ACCORDING TO INDONESIAN PATENT LAW." JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) 6, no. 1 (January 8, 2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i1.2801.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIndonesia as a member of the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) is obliged to comply with the provisions stipulated in the Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (“TRIPs Agreement”) especially regarding Patents; therefore, the Government of Indonesia regulates the provisions regarding Patents by Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patent which has been amended through Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation (“Indonesia Patent Law”). Article 20 of Indonesian Patent Law regulates that “the implementation of Patents must be implemented in Indonesia which can be done by making, importing, and licensing.”. Related to the protection of patent rights granted, the state also hopes to transfer technology from Patent Holders; thus, their inventions can be produced and used without paying royalties to Patent Holders. However, the provisions regulated by the Government of Indonesia stipulate that the implementation of Patent can be carried out by importing, which will result in no transfer of technology from the Patent Holders to the state; thus, it will be detrimental to Indonesia. Therefore this paper will examine and explain the impact of applying Article 20 of the Indonesian Patent Law, especially regarding the implementation of Patent and transfer of Patent Rights.AbstrakIndonesia sebagai anggota World Trade Organization (“WTO”) wajib memenuhi ketentuan yang ditetapkan dalam Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rigths Agreement (“TRIPs Agreement”) terutama mengenai Paten, oleh karena itu, Pemerintah Indonesia mengatur ketentuan mengenai Patent melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten yang telah diubah melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja (“UU Paten Indonesia”). Pasal 20 UU Paten Indonesia mengatur bahwa “implementasi Paten harus dilaksanakan di Indonesia yang dapat dilakukan dengan membuat, mengimpor, dan lisensi.”. Pada dasarnya terkait dengan perlindungan Hak Paten yang diberikan, negara juga berharap untuk terjadinya peralihan teknologi dari Pemegang Paten sehingga invensi mereka dapat diproduksi dan digunakan tanpa harus membayar royalty kepada Pemegang Paten. Namun, ketentuan yang diatur oleh Pemerintah Indonesia menetapkan bahwa implementasi Paten dapat dilakukan dengan importasi yang mana hal tersebut tidak akan menghasilkan peralihan teknologi dari Pemegang Paten kepada negara sehingga akan merugikan Indonesia. Oleh karena itu paper ini akan mengkaji dan menjelaskan dampak penerapan Pasal 20 UU Paten Indonesia khususnya mengenai implementasi Paten dan transfer Hak Patent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Patent' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography