Relevant bibliographies by topics / Participatory Health Research / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Participatory Health Research'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Participatory Health Research.
Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 19 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Participatory Health Research.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Khanlou, Nazilla. "Participatory health research." Nursing Inquiry 17, no. 4 (November 9, 2010): 281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00515.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jordan, John F. "Participatory research." British Journal of Learning Disabilities 29, no. 1 (March 2001): 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00068.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wright, Michael T., Jon Salsberg, and Susanne Hartung. "Impact in Participatory Health Research." BioMed Research International 2018 (October 21, 2018): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3907127.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Laurell, Asa Cristina, Mariano Noriega, Susana Martǐnez, and Jorge Villegas. "Participatory research on workers' health." Social Science & Medicine 34, no. 6 (March 1992): 603–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90188-v.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Baum, F. "Participatory action research." Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 60, no. 10 (October 1, 2006): 854–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rempfer, Melisa, and Jill Knott. "Participatory Action Research." Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 17, no. 3-4 (September 14, 2002): 151–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j004v17n03_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Page-Reeves, Janet. "Community-Based Participatory Research for Health." Health Promotion Practice 20, no. 1 (October 18, 2018): 15–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1524839918809007.

Full text
Abstract:
The new edition of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health by Nina Wallerstein and colleagues is an extremely valuable resource for a wide variety of stakeholders interested in collaborative work to promote health equity. This updated collection succinctly delineates the theory, history, principles, and practices of community-based participatory research (CBPR) to help the reader understand CBPR as an approach, a philosophy, and an ethic. This updated edition will serve as a helpful resource for those interested in incorporating CBPR principles and approaches into their work. The chapters are authored by leaders and innovators in CBPR who provide insights, share experiences, and describe case studies that expand our ability to understand and envision the transformative power of CBPR in practice. The book is divided thematically into seven parts plus 13 appendices. Updates to this edition align with critical dialogues about positionality, privilege, and power in a way that encourages healthy self-reflection.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Northway, Ruth. "Ending Participatory Research?" Journal of Learning Disabilities 4, no. 1 (March 2000): 27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146900470000400102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Coghlan, David. "Participatory Action Research in Health Care." Journal of Advanced Nursing 60, no. 1 (October 2007): 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04413.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

George, M. Anne, Mark Daniel, and Lawrence W. Green. "Appraising and Funding Participatory Research in Health Promotion." International Quarterly of Community Health Education 18, no. 2 (July 1998): 181–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/c1b5-7ppe-7tyl-7yn8.

Full text
Abstract:
Participatory action research combines research, education and social action. Each of these elements reflects health education research and practice. Indeed, health education, health promotion and participatory research have converged in these respects. Participatory research is well suited to the philosophies and theories underpinning community-based health education and health promotion. The nature of participatory research is such that funding agencies, especially those awarding research funds, tend to be challenged in their attempts to assess proposals. This is true at least for those agencies operating under traditional criteria for reviewing standards, which may not be appropriate for participatory research. As well, it may reflect a broader lack of common understanding about the processes and expectations, the apparent untidiness of projects (comparing with traditional research) which by their nature offer no standard methods, deadlines, procedures or predetermined outcome measures. The Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion [1], commissioned by the Royal Society of Canada, attempted to clarify the topic by providing a working definition and a set of guidelines for use by funding agencies when appraising projects purporting to be participatory research. The guidelines emphasize how the normal ways of conducting health research in populations need to adapt to meet the educational and policy expectations of participatory research. The study also examined current practical examples of participatory research in the field of health promotion in Canada. This summary of the results of the project provides detailed guidelines flowing from a review of experience in the field and consultation with groups engaged in participatory research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Martin, M. "Critical Education for Participatory Research." Sociological Research Online 2, no. 2 (June 1997): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.45.

Full text
Abstract:
This article takes the form of a case study of a master's course for health and development professionals working in the field of primary health care. It argues the need for health professionals to critically examine research paradigms and the assumptions that inform them, considering their appropriateness to primary health care, a health strategy based on a recognition of the relationship between inequalities and health status. Conventional training of health professionals does not encourage health workers to reflect critically on their research practice. This can be facilitated through an educational strategy that emphasises issues of inequality as central to health and addresses issues of power and purpose in research activity.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Springett, Jane. "Impact in participatory health research: what can we learn from research on participatory evaluation?" Educational Action Research 25, no. 4 (June 28, 2017): 560–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1342554.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Starrin, Bengt, and Per-Gunnar Svensson. "Participatory Research A Complementary Research Approach in Public Health." European Journal of Public Health 1, no. 1 (1991): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/1.1.29.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Rains, Joanne W., and Dixie Wiles Ray. "Participatory Action Research for Community Health Promotion." Public Health Nursing 12, no. 4 (August 1995): 256–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.1995.tb00145.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Westphal, Marcia Faria, Nilza Nunes Da Silva, and Maria Goretti Salles Maciel Md. "Participatory Research as Social Mobilization for Health." Promotion & Education 3, no. 4 (December 1996): 21–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/102538239600300409.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Townsend, Elizabeth, Diane E. Birch, Jack Langley, and Lynn Langille. "Participatory Research in a Mental Health Clubhouse." Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 20, no. 1 (January 2000): 18–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/153944920002000102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Kovacs, Pamela. "Participatory Action Research and Hospice:." Hospice Journal, The 15, no. 3 (June 29, 2000): 55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j011v15n03_04.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Oetzel, John G., Nina Wallerstein, Bonnie Duran, Shannon Sanchez-Youngman, Tung Nguyen, Kent Woo, Jun Wang, et al. "Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model." BioMed Research International 2018 (2018): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7281405.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives. A key challenge in evaluating the impact of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is identifying what mechanisms and pathways are critical for health equity outcomes. Our purpose is to provide an empirical test of the CBPR conceptual model to address this challenge. Methods. A three-stage quantitative survey was completed: (1) 294 US CBPR projects with US federal funding were identified; (2) 200 principal investigators completed a questionnaire about project-level details; and (3) 450 community or academic partners and principal investigators completed a questionnaire about perceived contextual, process, and outcome variables. Seven in-depth qualitative case studies were conducted to explore elements of the model not captured in the survey; one is presented due to space limitations. Results. We demonstrated support for multiple mechanisms illustrated by the conceptual model using a latent structural equation model. Significant pathways were identified, showing the positive association of context with partnership structures and dynamics. Partnership structures and dynamics showed similar associations with partnership synergy and community involvement in research; both of these had positive associations with intermediate community changes and distal health outcomes. The case study complemented and extended understandings of the mechanisms of how partnerships can improve community conditions. Conclusions. The CBPR conceptual model is well suited to explain key relational and structural pathways for impact on health equity outcomes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Haijes, Hanneke A., and Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel. "Participatory methods in pediatric participatory research: a systematic review." Pediatric Research 79, no. 5 (December 31, 2015): 676–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pr.2015.279.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Schneider, Barbara. "Participatory Action Research, Mental Health Service User Research, and the Hearing (our) Voices Projects." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11, no. 2 (April 2012): 152–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100203.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article I discuss participatory action research as a framework for enabling people diagnosed with mental health problems to carry out research and in doing so to promote health equity, citizenship, and social justice for people with a mental health diagnosis. The participatory approach to research aims to involve ordinary community members in generating practical knowledge about issues and problems of concern to them and through this promoting personal and social change. The article traces the development of participatory action research and describes its application in the mental health service user research movement. The Hearing (our) Voices projects, participatory research projects carried out in Calgary, Alberta by a group of people diagnosed with schizophrenia, are described to illustrate this approach to mental health research. Participation in research to promote health equity is about inclusion and about how marginalized people can claim full and equal citizenship as participants in and contributors to society.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Hill, Malcolm. "Participatory research with children." Child & Family Social Work 2, no. 3 (August 1997): 171–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.1997.00056.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Cook, Tina, Jonathan Boote, Nicola Buckley, Sofia Vougioukalou, and Michael Wright. "Accessing participatory research impact and legacy: developing the evidence base for participatory approaches in health research." Educational Action Research 25, no. 4 (July 31, 2017): 473–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1326964.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Anshori, Mohamad Alif Irfan, Astri Puji Lestari, and Kiki Amelia Devi. "Participatory Action Research: Maternal and Child Health System." Proceedings of the International Conference on Green Technology 10 (December 31, 2019): 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/icgt.v10i0.1137.

Full text
Abstract:
The birth of a child is basically very much awaited in every family. In order for the mother to be safe and the child to be born healthy, she must perform antenatal care routinely to the obstetrician or to the midwife. The longer the gestational age, the fetus will also grow and develop, so if not carried out proper supervision can cause problems both during pregnancy, at the time of delivery, even childbirth, and the worst can result in death of mother and baby. Pregnancy screening is also an effort to reduce maternal mortality. The frequency of antenatal care is used to assess the use of antenatal services in quantity. The higher the coverage of antenatal care, the more likely the process of pregnancy and childbirth can be carried out properly. So that theexamination of the womb during pregnancy is something that should not be missed and underestimated. In the obstetric examination the doctor or midwife will tell about the health of the fetus, fetal development, nutrition or any good food consumed during pregnancy, how to set a healthy diet for pregnant women, various exercise tips and healthy life that supports fetal growth and counting estimated date of birth of the baby. The estimateddate of birth of a baby is not always the same as the birth. Not a few who turned out to give birth before the estimated date and not a few also gave birth after the estimated date. From the problems, the solution to overcome this is that an Android-based application can be made that can connect between midwives and expectant mothers and can search for the nearest midwife. With this application, it is expected to help make it easier for mothers and midwives to find out the growth record of the fetus while in thewomb and facilitate the mother in the process of giving birth, especially during emergencies so that the mother will be immediately addressed by the nearest midwife and is expected to minimize the maternal mortality rate and baby during childbirth. Based on acceptance tests conducted on several users, it can be concluded that 84.3% of users agree that the application of"Sehati" is useful to support the health of pregnant women and children with an easy-to-understand appearance. Other statements include 9.1% neutral, and 6.6% disagree.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Mairhofer, Sigrid. "Community-Based Participatory Health Research: Promoting Health Equity in Communities." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 (July 2015): 382–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.153.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Mantoura, Pascale, Sylvie Gendron, and Louise Potvin. "Participatory research in public health: Creating innovative alliances for health." Health & Place 13, no. 2 (June 2007): 440–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.05.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Rose, Diana. "Participatory research: real or imagined." Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 53, no. 8 (June 21, 2018): 765–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

George, M. Anne, Mark Daniel, and Lawrence W. Green. "Appraising and Funding Participatory Research in Health Promotion." International Quarterly of Community Health Education 26, no. 2 (July 2006): 171–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/r031-n661-h762-7015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Corrigan, Patrick W. "Community-based participatory research (CBPR), stigma, and health." Stigma and Health 5, no. 2 (May 2020): 123–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/sah0000175.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Smikowski, Jane, Sarah Dewane, Mark E. Johnson, Christiane Brems, Catherine Bruss, and Laura Weiss Roberts. "Community-Based Participatory Research for Improved Mental Health." Ethics & Behavior 19, no. 6 (November 6, 2009): 461–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508420903274971.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Meyer, Mechthild C., Sara Torres, Nubia Cermeño, Lynne MacLean, and Rosa Monzón. "Immigrant Women Implementing Participatory Research in Health Promotion." Western Journal of Nursing Research 25, no. 7 (November 2003): 815–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193945903256707.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Fava, Nicole M., Michelle L. Munro-Kramer, Irene L. Felicetti, Cynthia S. Darling-Fisher, Michelle Pardee, Abigail Helman, Elisa M. Trucco, and Kristy K. Martyn. "Patient-Centered Participatory Research in Three Health Clinics." Western Journal of Nursing Research 38, no. 11 (July 9, 2016): 1509–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193945916654665.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Michael T. Wright, Bob Gardner, Brenda Roche, Hella von Unger, and Carly Ainlay. "Building an International Collaboration on Participatory Health Research." Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 4, no. 1 (2010): 31–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cpr.0.0102.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

SCHAFER, TIM. "Hearing (Our) Voices: Participatory Research in Mental Health." Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 18, no. 8 (September 6, 2011): e21-e22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01649.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Loewenson, Rene H., A. Cristina Laurell, L. Christer Hogstedt, and H. David Wegman. "Participatory Approaches and Epidemiology in Occupational Health Research." International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 1, no. 2 (April 1995): 121–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/oeh.1995.1.2.121.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Burdine, James N., Kenneth McLeroy, Craig Blakely, Monica L. Wendel, and Michael R. J. Felix. "Community-Based Participatory Research and Community Health Development." Journal of Primary Prevention 31, no. 1-2 (February 9, 2010): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10935-010-0205-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Kidd, Sean A., and Michael J. Kral. "Practicing participatory action research." Journal of Counseling Psychology 52, no. 2 (April 2005): 187–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.187.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Clemensen, Jane, Mette J. Rothmann, Anthony C. Smith, Liam J. Caffery, and Dorthe B. Danbjorg. "Participatory design methods in telemedicine research." Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 23, no. 9 (December 27, 2016): 780–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357633x16686747.

Full text
Abstract:
Healthcare systems require a paradigm shift in the way healthcare services are delivered to counteract demographic changes in patient populations, expanding technological developments and the increasing complexity of healthcare. Participatory design (PD) is a methodology that promotes the participation of users in the design process of potential telehealth applications. A PD project can be divided into four phases including: the identification and analysis of participant needs; the generation of ideas and development of prototypes; testing and further development of prototypes; and evaluation. PD is an iterative process where each phase is planned by reflecting on the results from the previous phase with respect to the participants’ contribution. Key activities of a PD project include: fieldwork; literature reviewing; and development and testing. All activities must be applied with a participatory mindset that will ensure genuine participation throughout the project. Challenges associated with the use of PD include: the time required to properly engage with participants; language and culture barriers amongst participants; the selection of participants to ensure good representation of the user group; and empowerment. PD is an important process, which is complemented by other evaluation strategies that assess organisational requirements, clinical safety, and clinical and cost effectiveness. PD is a methodology which encourages genuine involvement, where participants have an opportunity to identify practical problems and to design and test technology. The process engages participants in storytelling, future planning and design. PD is a multifaceted assessment tool that helps explore more accurately clinical requirements and patient perspectives in telehealth.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Baumann, Sara E., Pema Lhaki, and Jessica G. Burke. "Collaborative Filmmaking: A Participatory, Visual Research Method." Qualitative Health Research 30, no. 14 (July 31, 2020): 2248–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732320941826.

Full text
Abstract:
Filmmaking is a visual method that provides a unique opportunity for generating knowledge, but few studies have applied filmmaking in public health research. In this article, we introduce Collaborative Filmmaking as a public health research method, including a description of the six steps for implementation and an illustrative example from Nepal. Collaborative Filmmaking is an embodied, participatory, and visual research method in which participants are trained to create, analyze, and screen films to answer a research question. The method is useful for exploring sensitive health topics and providing nuanced insight into practices, relationships, and spaces that are difficult to capture using existing methods; however, its use requires close attention to ethical considerations. Building upon the trajectory of other visual and community-based research methods, Collaborative Filmmaking is valuable for gathering granular details and sensory data, co-analyzing data in partnership with participants, and producing participant-generated films that serve as powerful and authentic advocacy tools.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Wright, Michael T., Susanne Hartung, Mario Bach, Sven Brandes, Birte Gebhardt, Susanne Jordan, Ina Schaefer, and Petra Wihofszky. "Impact and Lessons Learned from a National Consortium for Participatory Health Research: PartKommPlus—German Research Consortium for Healthy Communities (2015–2018)." BioMed Research International 2018 (September 17, 2018): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5184316.

Full text
Abstract:
Integrated strategies of health promotion at the municipal level are receiving particular attention in public health policy and practice in Germany. These strategies are intended to provide a coordinated approach to health promotion during the entire lifespan, with a particular focus on vulnerable communities. They are also intended to be participatory in both their design and implementation, involving all sectors of the social welfare, educational and healthcare systems, civil society, and the general public. PartKommPlus—German Research Consortium for Healthy Communities is examining such strategies using participatory forms of research. The goal is to determine how participation can best be planned and implemented and what effects this participation has. In this article the work of PartKommPlus from the first funding phase (2015–2018) will be described with particular attention to the lessons learned and the forms of impact which are being considered as part of the participatory research process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Pollock, Linda. "Participatory Action Research in Health Care Tina Koch Participatory Action Research in Health Care Debbie Kralik Blackwell 186 £24.99 1405124164 1405124164." Nurse Researcher 14, no. 2 (January 2007): 93–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr.14.2.93.s3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Ferrari, Theresa M. "YA4-H! Youth Advocates for Health: Youth Participatory Action Research." Journal of Youth Development 13, no. 3 (September 18, 2018): 264–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2018.653.

Full text
Abstract:
Youth participatory action research is a process that is particularly relevant for health-related topics. YA4‑H! Youth Advocates for Health: Youth Participatory Action Research is a resource that youth development professionals can use to guide a group through such a project. The 124-page curriculum is based on key principles of youth development and youth participatory action research. It has 7 sections, each with activities built on the same template that includes the time needed, materials, and facilitator tips, which contributes to ease of use. Youth development professionals can feel confident knowing that the curriculum is research based and addresses adolescents’ developmental needs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Tucker, Melanie T., Dwight W. Lewis, Pamela Payne Foster, Felecia Lucky, Lea G. Yerby, Lisle Hites, and John C. Higginbotham. "Community-Based Participatory Research–Speed Dating." Health Promotion Practice 17, no. 6 (October 13, 2016): 775–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1524839916673612.

Full text
Abstract:
Developing meaningful community-based participatory relationships between researchers and the community can be challenging. The overall success of a community-based participatory relationship should be predicated on commitment and respect from empowered stakeholders. Prior to developing the technique discussed in this article, we hypothesized that the process of fostering relationships between researchers and the community was much like a social relationship: It has to develop organically and cannot be forced. To address this challenge, we developed a community-based participatory research–speed dating technique to foster relationships based on common interests, which we call CBPR-SD. This article describes the logistics of implementing CBPR-SD to foster scholarly collaborations. As part of a federally funded community-based research project, the speed dating technique was implemented for 10 researchers and 11 community leaders with a goal of developing scholarly collaborative groups who will submit applications for community-based research grants. In the end, four collaborative groups developed through CBPR-SD, three (75%) successfully submitted grant applications to fund pilot studies addressing obesity-related disparities in rural communities. Our preliminary findings suggest that CBPR-SD is a successful tool for promoting productive scholarly relationships between researchers and community leaders.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Xia, Ruiping, John R. Stone, Julie E. Hoffman, and Susan G. Klappa. "Promoting Community Health and Eliminating Health Disparities Through Community-Based Participatory Research." Physical Therapy 96, no. 3 (March 1, 2016): 410–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140529.

Full text
Abstract:
In physical therapy, there is increasing focus on the need at the community level to promote health, eliminate disparities in health status, and ameliorate risk factors among underserved minorities. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is the most promising paradigm for pursuing these goals. Community-based participatory research stresses equitable partnering of the community and investigators in light of local social, structural, and cultural elements. Throughout the research process, the CBPR model emphasizes coalition and team building that joins partners with diverse skills/expertise, knowledge, and sensitivities. This article presents core concepts and principles of CBPR and the rationale for its application in the management of health issues at the community level. Community-based participatory research is now commonly used to address public health issues. A literature review identified limited reports of its use in physical therapy research and services. A published study is used to illustrate features of CBPR for physical therapy. The purpose of this article is to promote an understanding of how physical therapists could use CBPR as a promising way to advance the profession's goals of community health and elimination of health care disparities, and social responsibility. Funding opportunities for the support of CBPR are noted.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

LITT, I. "Research with, not on, adolescents: community-based participatory research." Journal of Adolescent Health 33, no. 5 (November 2003): 315–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00322-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Litt, I. "Research with, not on, adolescents: community-based participatory research." Journal of Adolescent Health 33, no. 5 (November 2003): 315–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.08.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Nichols, Michelle, Gayenell Magwood, Michelle Woodbury, Kimberly Brown, Carolyn Jenkins, and Mayowa Owolabi. "Crafting Community-Based Participatory Research Stroke Interventions." Stroke 53, no. 3 (March 2022): 680–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.121.035306.

Full text
Abstract:
Stroke exerts a tremendous burden on individuals, families, communities, and health systems globally. Even more troublesome are the striking disparities faced across diverse populations. These disparities are further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite efforts to advance stroke research, substantial gaps remain in understanding factors that contribute to stroke disparities, including the Social Determinants of Health. Strategically designed studies and tailored interventions are needed to bridge the inequities high-risk populations face and to meet their specific needs. Community-based participatory research offers an approach to equitably partner with community members to understand and work collaboratively to address community-specific health priorities. In this focused update, we highlight the main processes of community-based participatory research studies and share exemplars from our team’s work in stroke research and from the literature. As we continue to face an increasing prevalence of stroke, compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing implications of the Social Determinants of Health, partnering with communities to address community-driven health priorities can inform interventions targeted to overcome the disparities faced by certain populations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Sitter, Kathleen C. "Participatory video analysis in disability research." Disability & Society 30, no. 6 (July 3, 2015): 910–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1057319.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Cook, Tina. "Community-based participatory research for health: advancing social and health equity." Educational Action Research 27, no. 1 (September 12, 2018): 144–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1520135.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Powers, Jane L., and Jennifer S. Tiffany. "Engaging Youth in Participatory Research and Evaluation." Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 12 (November 2006): S79—S87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200611001-00015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Di Ruggiero, Erica, and Nancy Edwards. "The Interplay between Participatory Health Research and Implementation Research: Canadian Research Funding Perspectives." BioMed Research International 2018 (2018): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1519402.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives. The objective of this paper is to investigate what participatory health research (PHR) can offer implementation research (IR) and vice versa and discuss what health research funders can do to foster the intersection of both fields.Methods. We contrast points of divergence and convergence between IR and PHR. We reflect on whether community engagement is necessary and on the unintended consequences of participation in IR. We describe how a research funder can incentivize PHR in IR.Results. Participation is encouraged in IR but the nuances of who is involved merit greater attention in IR. PHR and IR differ in emphasis placed on the scale-up of the intervention. However, they share a common interest in generating real-world contextually relevant evidence.Conclusions. We need to assess whether and how funding practices influence researchers in how they undertake PHR. Researchers need to better account for participatory approaches to ensure that any potentially harmful consequences are described (and better understood so they can be mitigated in the future) and elucidate the ways in which these processes do or do not enable implementation and scale-up of interventions in IR.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Participatory Health Research' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography