Relevant bibliographies by topics / Participatory and deliberative processes

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Participatory and deliberative processes'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 7 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Participatory and deliberative processes.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Participatory and deliberative processes"

1

Ganuza, Ernesto, and Francisco Francés. "The deliberative turn in participation: the problem of inclusion and deliberative opportunities in participatory budgeting." European Political Science Review 4, no. 2 (November 14, 2011): 283–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1755773911000270.

Full text
Abstract:
Participation has undergone a communicative shift, which has favoured the organization of new participatory processes based on classic principles of deliberation theory. These experiments go beyond traditional protest: they include a communicative element with the aim of defining a public politics, which places them alongside models of deliberative governance. The present work sets out the characteristics of these new instruments (participatory budgeting, PB) in order to find out which problems deliberative governance initiatives are faced with. The conclusions tell us that the inequalities in participation are significant. Nevertheless, PB enables most participants to make effective use of their opportunities for deliberation. From this standpoint, the challenge for deliberative governance does not seem to be the deliberative capabilities of individuals, but rather the design of participatory procedures and the participation of individuals. We may question whether the administration can guarantee impartial political spaces that are as inclusive as possible.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Enaifoghe, Andrew Osehi. "Deliberative Politics through Citizens’ Participatory Democracy: A model for Africa Political Processes." Journal of Social and Development Sciences 10, no. 1(S) (April 23, 2019): 11–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v10i1(s).2807.

Full text
Abstract:
This article explores the present crisis of democratic governance or administration in Africa and examines the elective capability of deliberative majority rules system of democracy, in which the desire of the general public is educated by mindful, engaged citizen’s commitment and conversation. There are various questions needing answers; are the various and spellbound citizenry even equipped for consultation? How likely is amass thought of deliberation to achieve a very much contemplated choice? Wouldn’t it gather consultation reproduce a similar power lopsided characteristics blocking different sorts of talk? Deliberative models are displayed in principle and practical discourse, with contextual investigations including the furious populism of the Brexit vote, the ascent of deliberative components. What the contributing creators do share is the acknowledgement that the authenticity of appointive portrayal or representatives endures when individuals in the majority rule system of governments end up frustrated, disillusioned, and repelled. This study gives challenging and convincing thoughts regarding how to re-establish confidence in popular democratic governments by making them stronger and responsive. This study adopted a qualitative method of analysis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Martinez Palacios, Jone. "Equality and diversity in democracy: how can we democratize inclusively?" Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 35, no. 5/6 (June 20, 2016): 350–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/edi-04-2016-0030.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework for democratize inclusively through participatory and deliberative apparatus. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on literature from inclusion in deliberation, gender in participation and intersectionality to critically analyze the democratic deepening. By bringing into dialogue with one another “the norm of parity of participation” (Fraser, 2006), “communicative democracy” (Young, 1993) and the “matrix of domination” (Collins, 1990) a response to one of the questions that has been put to European and North American thought in democracy since the 1960s is proposed: how is it possible to democratize inclusively? Findings The reproduction of domination through apparatuses for the extension of democracy is both possible and probable. So, to democratize inclusively, it is necessary to bring the theories on vertical and horizontal inclusion into dialogue with each other. With the aim of establishing a dialogue between the two, it is necessary to export complex thought regarding oppression and inequality into the design of deliberative and participatory apparatuses. For that, consider that designing democratization processes based on the fact that the intersectional experience of oppression is not an exception but rather an everyday occurrence allows participatory procedures to be made more inclusive. Practical implications This paper proposes a tool designed with a focus on dialogue among the norm of parity of participation, communicative democracy and the matrix of oppression, based on 11 direct questions for the inclusive design of deliberative or participatory procedures. Facilitators, experts and social agents involved in deliberative or participatory processes will be able to use this question-based instrument in their work. Originality/value This paper has applied value because it offers a conceptual key to the design of and thought about participatory inclusive processes. The originality of this approach lies in its shift away from partial analyses of horizontal and vertical inclusion. It is of use both to facilitators of participatory processes and educators and researchers concerned with democratization. It offers an instrument for working on reflexivity with regard to inclusion in democratic extension, based on a series of key questions that can be used as a checklist. In comparison with other forms of considering inclusion in democracy, the proposal considered includes complex thought on oppression based on the critique of simple identity, as well as on an intersectional perspective.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Wojcieszak, M. E., Y. M. Baek, and M. X. D. Carpini. "Deliberative and Participatory Democracy? Ideological Strength and the Processes Leading from Deliberation to Political Engagement." International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22, no. 2 (May 5, 2010): 154–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp050.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kapoor, Kawaljeet Kaur, Amizan Omar, and Uthayasankar Sivarajah. "Enabling Multichannel Participation Through ICT Adaptation." International Journal of Electronic Government Research 13, no. 2 (April 2017): 66–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijegr.2017040104.

Full text
Abstract:
Online deliberation invests significant sums in priorities co-decided by inhabitants, and is mostly relegated to small and non-influential experiments. There is a gap between ICT solutions and participatory initiatives. E-participation is a broad, undefined space of opportunities that needs to be operationalized to prove if the many theoretical exercises emphasizing on the potential of ICT in increasing deliberative quality of participatory processes and security, are realistic or not. The EMPATIA platform seeks to radically enhance inclusiveness and impact of participatory budgeting processes in increasing multichannel citizen participation by designing, evaluating and making publicly available an advanced ICT platform for participatory budgeting. EMPATIA takes advantage of the fact that it surrounds an established and widespread social practice with clear and adaptable principles recognized worldwide, alongside a community of practitioners and researchers, and ICT tools, which only need to be adapted, refined and integrated into an adequate PB platform.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Shin, Bokyong, and Mikko Rask. "Assessment of Online Deliberative Quality: New Indicators Using Network Analysis and Time-Series Analysis." Sustainability 13, no. 3 (January 23, 2021): 1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13031187.

Full text
Abstract:
Online deliberation research has recently developed automated indicators to assess the deliberative quality of much user-generated online data. While most previous studies have developed indicators based on content analysis and network analysis, time-series data and associated methods have been studied less thoroughly. This article contributes to the literature by proposing indicators based on a combination of network analysis and time-series analysis, arguing that it will help monitor how online deliberation evolves. Based on Habermasian deliberative criteria, we develop six throughput indicators and demonstrate their applications in the OmaStadi participatory budgeting project in Helsinki, Finland. The study results show that these indicators consist of intuitive figures and visualizations that will facilitate collective intelligence on ongoing processes and ways to solve problems promptly.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Godwin, Marcia L. "Studying Participatory Budgeting." State and Local Government Review 50, no. 2 (June 2018): 132–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0160323x18784333.

Full text
Abstract:
Participatory budgeting (PB) is increasingly being used by local governments. The first American PB process was in Chicago in 2009 and built upon processes developed in Brazil. The adoption of PB programs in the United States has been closely tied to deliberative democracy and public engagement scholarship. As a result, PB research has benefited from detailed evaluations conducted as the first PB programs were implemented. This review essay also identifies research findings and topics for additional research. Public administration scholars and practitioners can especially contribute to this emerging literature by examining budget outcomes and the perspectives of public sector employees.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Barinaga-Rementeria, Itziar, Artitzar Erauskin-Tolosa, Pedro José Lozano, and Itxaro Latasa. "Individual and Social Preferences in Participatory Multi-Criteria Evaluation." Sustainability 11, no. 20 (October 17, 2019): 5746. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11205746.

Full text
Abstract:
Decisions on environmental issues are complex and multidimensional as they represent multiple interests and values. Nevertheless, the ability of participatory multi-criteria methodologies to deal with this kind of problem is widely acknowledged. Traditionally, multi-criteria methods have focused more on technical issues than on the representation of participants’ preferences. In participatory processes there are questions such as who establishes the mechanisms of participation, in what terms these processes are developed and who is going to participate, which are determining factors that have not been sufficiently studied in multi-criteria analysis. This paper, in order to shed light on this gap, aims to compare the creation of social preferences under two different participatory approaches. For this purpose, two different participatory approaches are compared. On the one hand, applying the social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) method, a deliberative process is developed following the principles of deliberative democracy. On the other hand, an aggregation process of individual preferences has been developed based on information collected through surveys. Both approaches have advantages as well as constraints. Our main finding is that the information obtained through the different participatory methods is different and complementary. Therefore, we can state that both participatory methods can be enriching assessment processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lafont, Cristina. "Can Democracy be Deliberative & Participatory? The Democratic Case for Political Uses of Mini-Publics." Daedalus 146, no. 3 (July 2017): 85–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00449.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay focuses on recent proposals to confer decisional status upon deliberative mini-publics such as citizens' juries, Deliberative Polls, and citizens' assemblies. Against such proposals, I argue that inserting deliberative mini-publics into political decision-making processes would diminish the democratic legitimacy of the political system as a whole. This negative conclusion invites a question: which political uses of mini-publics would yield genuinely democratic improvements? Drawing from a participatory conception of deliberative democracy, I propose several uses of mini-publics that could enhance the democratic legitimacy of political decision-making in current societies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Brear, Michelle. "Silence and voice in participatory processes – causes, meanings and implications for empowerment." Community Development Journal 55, no. 2 (September 5, 2018): 349–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsy041.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The empowerment-related outcomes of participation in development rely on community members contributing intellectually to deliberative processes. However, people are entitled to remain silent. Silence is conceptualized both as a form of resistance and a type of structured self-censorship. In participatory development, these divergent conceptualizations manifest as the incongruent recommendations to ‘give voice’ and ‘tolerate silence’. My aim is to advance understandings of the causes and meanings of silence in participatory development and discuss the implications for deliberative processes. I do this through an interpretive analysis of ethnographic data detailing a process of co-designing participatory action research (PAR) about health, which I facilitated. The analysis is informed by Bourdieu’s theory of social power relations and Nussbaum’s capabilities approach. The co-researcher participants often remained silent when provided an opportunity to contribute their voices because they were afraid, for example, of getting the wrong answer. The silences frustrated the co-researchers because they valued having a voice. They frustrated me because I expected and needed the co-researchers to contribute their voice to make the research design process participatory. I used a variety of strategies to disrupt silences, which when successful generated lived experiences through which the co-researchers could imagine themselves as important people, with entitlement and competence to speak. The study demonstrates the importance of considering the structural barriers to marginalized people contributing their voices, and incorporating strategies for disrupting marginalized silences into PAR and other participatory development processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Participatory and deliberative processes"

1

au, K. Buselich@murdoch edu, and Kathryn Buselich. "Creating transactional space for sustainability: a case study of the Western Australian Collaboration." Murdoch University, 2007. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20071220.132317.

Full text
Abstract:
Progressing sustainability requires a more networked approach to governance—an approach that connects otherwise segmented policy areas and fosters greater communication among governments, stakeholders and citizens. Of particular importance is the development of discursive spaces in which diverse actors are able to explore the differing knowledge, perspectives and values raised by the challenge of sustainability. This thesis develops the notion of transactional space to bring into focus the processes of reflection, dialogue and mutual learning that effective sustainability discourse involves. In the first part of the thesis I review literature on the theory and practice of participation, deliberation and collaboration, giving particular attention to the ways in which these processes have potential to create space for a depth of exchange and enable participants to engage with the tensions inherent in complex policy issues. While many authors point to the importance of negotiating difference in these processes, the literature reveals that, in practice, this type of exchange tends to be overlooked or underdeveloped. I therefore argue in this thesis that critical, reflective dialogue plays a key role in generating greater understanding among participants, more comprehensive understanding of policy issues, and more integrative and shared approaches, and for these reasons must be actively developed. The case study in the second part of the thesis explores this concern for developing reflective exchange in practice. The formation of the Western Australian Collaboration in 2002—a partnership of non-government organizations from a range of social and environmental perspectives committed to ‘a just and sustainable Western Australia’—represented an opportunity to examine the development of participatory and collaborative processes for sustainability. The thesis presents a case study of the WA Collaboration’s development over 2002-2006 to illustrate the potential such networks and open forums offer for transformative exchange around sustainability. It describes the intensive process conducted with the Steering Committee to cultivate a culture of reflection and learning in the organization, and the practical initiatives the process helped to generate. The thesis concludes with a discussion of the lessons learnt and key principles and practical considerations relevant to fostering transactional space. The WA Collaboration experience and the review of literature reveal a tendency in practice to privilege action and outcomes over reflection and learning. Furthermore, despite the necessity for a depth of engagement with complex policy issues, funding systems and policy environments often fail to allow the time and resources needed to support genuine dialogue and collaborative work. The thesis provides the concept and principles of transactional space as a means of helping to address this imbalance. They are designed to encourage practitioners to create opportunities for critical, reflective dialogue in a range of deliberative settings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Korts-Laur, Anni. "Deliberative dimensions in participatory democracy : the case of the participatory budgeting process in Tartu, Estonia." Master's thesis, FEUC, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/33225.

Full text
Abstract:
Dissertação de mestrado em Roads to Democracy(ies) - Democracia e Governação, apresentada à Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, sob a orientação de Sílvia Ferreira.
Desde o final dos anos 80, quando o orçamento participativo foi inventado em Porto Alegre, o número de governos locais que adotaram o procedimento continua em crescimento. Paralelamente tem-se verificado uma afirmação progressiva da democracia deliberativa, a qual possui tensões conceptuais e normativas com o modelo da democracia participativa, da qual o orçamento participativo é um instrumento de sucesso. É importante adaptar a qualidade deliberativa dos processos participativos com vista a revitalizar potencial democrático do orçamento participativo. Nesta perspetiva, o objetivo desta dissertação de mestrado é identificar que elementos da democracia deliberativa estão presentes no modelo de orçamento participativo em Tartu, na Estónia. Esta dissertação começará por descrever os conceitos de democracia participativa e deliberativa, prosseguindo com uma descrição sobre o surgimento do orçamento participativo e fornecendo uma visão geral das tipologias existentes na Europa. Avança-se, depois, para a abordagem analítica e metodológica deste estudo e, finalmente, antes de analisar os dados empíricos, é apresentado o contexto da democracia na Estónia e o caso do orçamento participativo em Tartu. O estudo de caso centrou-se no processo de orçamento participativo na Cidade de Tartu, Estónia, no ano de 2015. A recolha de dados empíricos no terreno verificou-se em julho de 2016. O estudo incluiu análise documental e entrevistas a eleitores, autores ou proponentes de uma ideia para o orçamento participativo e ao gestor de projeto esta iniciativa da autarquia da Cidade de Tartu. Este estudo mostra que o orçamento participativo é um instrumento da democracia participativa e que, além disso, que detém elementos de democracia deliberativa, tais como: o debate, dado que o processo de orçamento participativo instou alguns dos eleitores a debater as propostas tanto em espaços formais como informais; o poder educativo foi evidenciado não só através da participação, mas também dos próprios debates; a existência de procedimentos para o debate formal através da facilitação de um moderador; o sentimento de empoderamento resultante da perceção de que as pessoas podem ter uma palavra a dizer, usarem o seu poder, e mesmo a ideia de que a participação inspira as pessoas a serem mais ativas como cidadãs. Os resultados apoiam, até certo ponto, a tese de que o modelo de orçamento participativo em Tartu reforça a capacitação da comunidade e dos cidadãos. Tal acontece quer em virtude da prática dos autores de ideias de divulgação dos seus projetos, quer em virtude da familiarização dos eleitores com os projetos, os quais podem instruí-los relativamente às questões no seu bairro e na cidade em geral.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Holdo, Markus. "Field Notes on Deliberative Democracy : Power and Recognition in Participatory Budgeting." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-232462.

Full text
Abstract:
The theory of deliberative democracy suggests that public discourse should be guided by reasonable arguments. In real life, power relations not only obstruct free exchanges of reasons but also shape our understandings and expectations of what it means to provide reasons and to speak with authority. Struggles over power and recognition are necessary parts of deliberation. This thesis asks how groups that are marginalized in public discourse can act to demand recognition in public sphere deliberation. The thesis draws on work by Pierre Bourdieu to make the argument that actors can use various kinds of capital to advance their interests in public deliberation. Based on research on participatory budgeting in the city of Rosario, Argentina, the thesis demonstrates that state-sponsored arenas of deliberation can work as strategic social fields that ground struggles for recognition in new forms of capital. On the basis of “deliberative capital” participants can demand recognition from fellow citizens and political decision-makers. The case study of Rosario’s participatory budget demonstrates that participating citizens expected public recognition for their commitment to deliberative values. The study shows, moreover, that local politicians had reasons to respect participants’ independence from the government. Participatory budgeting could serve the political purpose of legitimizing the government on the condition that participants were recognized as independent actors who work in the interest of their neighborhoods. These arguments are presented in three essays, each making distinct contributions to debates on deliberation and inclusion. The first essay makes a theoretical argument for utilizing Bourdieu’s concepts of field, investment and capital in theorizing on public deliberation. The second essay provides an empirically grounded argument for thinking of empowerment in terms of deliberative capital. The third essay demonstrates a mechanism of non-cooptation that should be of wider relevance to debates about the merits of deliberative governance projects in urban politics. Taken together, the essays demonstrate that citizens can capitalize on an interest in legitimizing power through deliberation by conditioning their participation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Schechter, Chen. "Deliberative processes of high school principals with a military background /." The Ohio State University, 2000. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu148820267877438.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kelshaw, Todd Spencer. "Public meetings and public officials : officeholders' accounts of participatory and deliberative democratic encounters with citizens /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/6169.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Brown, Julia Catherine. "Participatory Processes and Outcomes of South Africa's Water Reforms." Thesis, University of Manchester, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.509050.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cretney, Alison, Steven Cretney, and Tracy Meisterheim. "Integrating Participatory Processes in Planning for Strategic Sustainable Development." Thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Sektionen för ingenjörsvetenskap, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-4223.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis examines how dialogue-based methodologies can be integrated into a participatory planning process for strategic sustainable development. Evidence of the complex nature of the sustainability challenge is cited as necessitating tools and methodologies suited for dealing with complexity. The methodologies in this study were designed to use dialogue to address complex problems in which outcomes are unpredictable. Within the sustainability practitioner community, we identified a need for research on systematic guidance for pairing engagement processes with use of the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development (FSSD). This research focuses on how a specific set of dialogue-based methodologies within the Art of Hosting network can be integrated with the FSSD to strengthen the linkage between content and process. As the culmination of our research, we have developed The Weave: Participatory Process Design Guide for Strategic Sustainable Development (www.theweave.info). It includes a Template for process design, suggestions and examples for use, and guiding principles. It is the first prototype of participatory process design guidance to be offered for pilot testing in the field of strategic sustainable development.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hartmann, Angela. "Talking water : assessing deliberative participation in water abstraction decision processes in the Norfolk Broads." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.268545.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Pollastri, Serena. "Visual conversations on urban futures : understanding participatory processes and artefacts." Thesis, Lancaster University, 2017. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/88214/.

Full text
Abstract:
Visualisations of future cities contribute to our social imaginary. They can, and have been used as speculative objects for imagining new possible ways of living as communities (Dunn et al., 2014). However, future cities are usually represented through coherent scenarios that only tell one story (or one version of it), and rarely express the complexity of urban life. How can the diversity that characterises the city be represented in visions of the future that give voice to different, diverging ways of living and experiencing it? How do these visualisations contribute to inclusive design and research actions aimed at envisioning, prototyping, and reflecting on possible scenarios for liveable cities? My research focuses on ways of visualising possibilities for life in future cities that include and valorise plurality and agonism (DiSalvo, 2010), rather than present (as usually happens) only one story. For a lack of existing terminology, I am calling this approach “Visual Conversations on Urban Futures” (VCUF).Although there are no definitions or structured descriptions of VCUF, some prototypes can be found in design, art, and architecture. These examples show the great variety of methods and media that can be adopted in participatory processes of imagining futures cities. As a designer, I have chosen to adopt an action-research methodology (Kock, 2012; Rust, Mottram, & Till, 2007) to conduct, document, and reflect on a series of design experiments (Eriksen & Bang, 2013) that enhance my understanding of what it means to make pluralism explicit when producing visions of urban futures. The four main design experiments that I have undertaken are:-Living in the city. A first experiment in visualising future urban scenarios from a collaboratively written text.-Envisioning Urban Futures. Speculative Co-design practices: designing spaces for imaginary explorations and mapping them in an Atlas that makes visions readable and explorable-Sharing Cities. Conducting situated conversations on the relationship between social practices and urban futures: co-creating scenarios of sharing cities.-Birmingham Parks Summit. Visions designed to be unpacked, reworked, and developed into actions. The main contribution of my research is the proposal of a set of design principles, including a definition of the design space of VCUF. The design space outlined in the dissertation is a framework that can be used both as an analytical lens (to understand existing processes and artefacts of VCUF) as well as a design tool. Visual Conversations on Urban Futures could offer a significant contribution to the early stages of scenario building processes for possible futures. Manzini and Coad (2015) describe scenarios as “communicative artifacts produced to further the social conversation about what to do”. This way of imagining futures is ultimately about building alternatives to the dominant order by “making possible what appear(s) to be impossible” (Lefebvre, 1970, cited in Buckley & Violeau, 2011).While in times of urgent change seeking clarity and agreement might seem a much preferable route, I argue that articulating divergence is a necessary step to explore truly radical solutions. Stepping back from a solution-oriented approach allows us to visualise and better understand underlying tensions, and to critically question assumptions about what futures are or should be desirable.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Saati, Abrak. "The Participation Myth : outcomes of participatory constitution building processes on democracy." Doctoral thesis, Umeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-102719.

Full text
Abstract:
Since the early 1990s a growing number of constitution building processes in countries transitioning from authoritarian rule or recovering from war or severe institutional crisis have involved public participation. This increase stems from an assumption made by many peacebuilding scholars and practitioners that public participation in constitution building will lead to higher levels of democracy. This assumption has not, however, been the subject of systematic or comprehensive analysis. Therefore, the overarching purpose of this thesis is to scrutinize the participation-hypothesis - as it is referred to in this study. The study is a two-step investigation. The first part begins with an analysis of twenty cases of participatory constitution building that have occurred in post-conflict states, transitioning states and countries that have experienced a severe institutional crisis. In order to differentiate the cases in terms of how much influence participants were granted, an analytical framework is developed and the cases are categorized as either false, symbolic, limited, consultative or substantial participation. The participation-hypothesis is then empirically investigated by comparing democracy levels prior to and after the process for each of the 20 cases. In order to further test the hypothesis, cases of constitution making in which there was no public participation are then added to the investigation. These cases are included as a point of reference – the democratic outcome in this group is compared with the democratic outcome in the twenty participatory processes. The empirical results reveal that there is no relationship between public participation in constitution building processes and higher levels of democracy. On the contrary, some cases that involved considerable influence for participants have not experienced improved levels of democracy, while cases with low levels of influence for participants have shown democratic improvement. Moreover, a majority of cases of constitution making without public participation have also experienced increases in their democracy scores. Therefore, the conclusion of the first part of the study is that the participation-hypothesis does not stand up to empirical scrutiny. Particularly challenging for the participation-hypothesis is the fact that the analysis in part one shows that similar participatory processes have been followed by democratic improvement in some countries and democratic decline in others. Two such cases are Kenya and Zimbabwe. While democracy levels have increased in Kenya since the conclusion of the process, they have steadily declined in Zimbabwe. In the second part of the study, these two countries are therefore the object of intense, systematic and comparative scrutiny in order to explore factors beyond participation in constitution building that might explain the different trajectories of democracy. The comparison shows that the actions of political elites – in particular their ability to cooperate with each other – is the major explanation as to why the two wind up on different paths. The importance of elite cooperation is well-established in the democratization literature. One major conclusion of this study is therefore that the participation-hypothesis needs to be informed by insights drawn from this literature.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Participatory and deliberative processes"

1

1978-, Röcke Anja, and Herzberg Carsten, eds. Participatory budgeting in Europe: Democracy and public governance. Farnham, Surry, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Holdo, Markus. Field notes on deliberative democracy: Power and recognition in participatory budgeting. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Guèye, Bara. Participatory evaluation and budgetary processes. London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

García, Xavier Moya. Winning spaces: Participatory methodologies in rural processes in Mexico. Brighton, Sussex, England: Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Barros, Tania Jordán. Key elements of effective participatory processes: Three case studies in the UK. Wolverhampton: University of Wolverhampton, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Bourget, Lisa. Converging waters: Integrating collaborative modeling with participatory processes to make water resources decisions. Alexandria, VA: IWR Press, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

service), SpringerLink (Online, ed. Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions: The Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-making. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Entwicklungspolitik, Deutsches Institut für, and International Food Policy Research Institute, eds. Agricultural policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: Understanding CAADP and APRM policy processes ; Research Project "Agricultural Policies in Sub-Saharan Africa : Understanding and Improving Participatory Policy Processes in APRM and CAADP". Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

The World Bank's disclosure policy review and the role of democratic participatory processes in achieving successful development outcomes: Hearing before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, September 10, 2009. Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Participatory and deliberative processes"

1

Balint, Peter J., Ronald E. Stewart, Anand Desai, and Lawrence C. Walters. "Participatory Processes." In Wicked Environmental Problems, 103–27. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-047-7_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

He, Baogang. "Participatory and Deliberative Institutions in China." In The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China, 175–96. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780312376154_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Smith, Cobi, and Gene Rowe. "Deliberative Processes in Practice." In The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, 59–70. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32240-7_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Röder, Stefanie, and Winfried Tautges. "Designing Participatory Processes." In Knowledge Management in Electronic Government, 249–56. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24683-1_25.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Melrose, Susan. "Expert-intuitive and deliberative processes." In Contemporary Choreography, 25–40. Second edition. | Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315563596-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lavín, José M., and David Ríos Insua. "Participatory Processes and Instruments." In e-Democracy, 31–45. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9045-4_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kersting, Norbert, Jana Gasparikova, Angel Iglesias, and Jelizaveta Krenjova. "Local Democratic Renewal by Deliberative Participatory Instruments: Participatory Budgeting in Comparative Study." In Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis, 317–31. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_18.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Devos, Tim, Seppe De Blust, and Maarten Desmet. "Valuating narrative accounts in participatory planning processes." In Participatory Design Theory, 15–27. New York : Routledge, 2019. | Series: Routledge research in planning and urban design: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315110332-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Urbanic, R. Jill, and Waguih Elmaraghy. "Modelling of Participatory Manufacturing Processes." In Methods and Tools for Co-operative and Integrated Design, 327–38. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2256-8_28.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Falanga, Roberto. "Administrative Discretion in Participatory Processes." In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3547-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Participatory and deliberative processes"

1

Xiao, Lu, Weiyu Zhang, Anna Przybylska, Anna De Liddo, Gregorio Convertino, Todd Davies, and Mark Klein. "Design for Online Deliberative Processes and Technologies." In CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2727687.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dreessen, Katrien, Niels Hendriks, Selina Schepers, and Andrea Wilkinson. "Towards reciprocity in Participatory Design processes." In PDC '20: Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation Otherwise. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385129.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Pita, Juliano Veraldo da Costa, and Marcelo Cláudio Tramontano. "Building Information Modeling for Participatory Decisionmaking Processes." In 37 Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe and XXIII Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, Joint Conference (N. 1). São Paulo: Editora Blucher, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5151/proceedings-ecaadesigradi2019_312.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Klammer, Julia, Fred van den Anker, and Monique Janneck. "Embedding participatory design processes into everyday work activities." In the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900485.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Sorgalla, Jonas, Peter Schabsky, Sabine Sachweh, Miriam Grates, and Elisabeth Heite. "Improving Representativeness in Participatory Design Processes with Elderly." In CHI '17: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053076.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Heimdal, Elisabeth, and Tanja Rosenqvist. "Textiles as tangible working materials in participatory design processes." In the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900483.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Schepers, Selina, Katrien Dreessen, and Bieke Zaman. "Exploring user gains in participatory design processes with vulnerable children." In PDC '18: Participatory Design Conference 2018. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3210604.3210617.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Del Gaudio, Chiara, Alfredo Jefferson de Oliveira, and Carlo Franzato. "The influence of local powers on participatory design processes in marginalized conflict areas." In the 13th Participatory Design Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661440.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lyckvi, Sus, Virpi Roto, Elizabeth Buie, and Yiying Wu. "The role of design fiction in participatory design processes." In NordiCHI'18: Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240258.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kulozu, Neslihan. "Effects of Interpersonal Relationship Dimension on Locally Specific Participatory Processes." In International Conference on Political Science, International Relations and Sociology. Cognitive-crcs, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.05.03.5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Participatory and deliberative processes"

1

Burns, Danny, Marina Apgar, and Anna Raw. Designing a Participatory Programme at Scale: Phases 1 and 2 of the CLARISSA Programme on Worst Forms of Child Labour. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/clarissa.2021.004.

Full text
Abstract:
CLARISSA (Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia) is a large-scale Participatory Action Research programme which aims to identify, evidence, and promote effective multi-stakeholder action to tackle the drivers of the worst forms of child labour in selected supply chains in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Myanmar. CLARISSA places a particular focus on participants’ own ‘agency’. In other words, participants’ ability to understand the situation they face, and to develop and take actions in response to them. Most of CLARISSA’s participants are children. This document shares the design and overarching methodology of the CLARISSA programme, which was co-developed with all consortium partners during and since the co-generation phase of the programme (September 2018–June 2020). The immediate audience is the CLARISSA programme implementation teams, plus the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO). This design document is also a useful reference point for other programmes trying to build large-scale participatory processes. It provides a clear overview of the CLARISSA programmatic approach, the design, and how it is being operationalised in context.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Khan, Ayesha. Supporting Women’s Empowerment in Pakistan: Lessons for Donors. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), January 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ids.2021.001.

Full text
Abstract:
In a context where democratic culture and civil society space are under threat, rights-based organisations face increased restrictions on their activities, and donors are finding it harder to engage with them. However, findings show that donor support is crucial for successful women’s empowerment initiatives. Our research on women’s activism in Pakistan suggests donors should strategically support women’s social and political action for empowerment and accountability by continuing to support advocacy organisations, which develop women’s skills to engage with participatory political processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Khan, Ayesha. Supporting Women’s Empowerment in Pakistan: Lessons for Donors. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), January 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ids.2021.001.

Full text
Abstract:
In a context where democratic culture and civil society space are under threat, rights-based organisations face increased restrictions on their activities, and donors are finding it harder to engage with them. However, findings show that donor support is crucial for successful women’s empowerment initiatives. Our research on women’s activism in Pakistan suggests donors should strategically support women’s social and political action for empowerment and accountability by continuing to support advocacy organisations, which develop women’s skills to engage with participatory political processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cedergren, Elin, Diana Huynh, Andrea Morf, and John Moodie. Strengthening regional resilience through adaptive collaboration: A case study on the fisheries co-management Northern Bohuslän. Nordregio, September 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/pb2020:5.2001-3876.

Full text
Abstract:
This policy brief examines how co-management arrangements within small-scale fisheries can play a key role in enhancing sectoral and regional resilience. Despite major challenges, “multi-stakeholder collaborations” - such as co-management - demonstrate the potential for innovative knowledge transfer and strategic adaptation processes within the fisheries sector. The focus here is on Co-management Northern Bohuslän (Samförvaltning Norra Bohuslän), which promotes sustainable local fisheries and blue growth on Sweden’s west coast. The case illustrates how, under appropriate conditions, participatory local efforts can significantlycontribute to sustainability and resilience. The policy brief presents findings on related challenges and opportunities, including recommendations on future directions for the co-management initiative itself, and more general suggestions for co-management as a means to promote sectoral and regional resilience in the Nordic region.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Powerful Learning with Computational Thinking: Our Why, What, and How of Computational Thinking. Digital Promise, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/115.

Full text
Abstract:
The Powerful Learning with Computational Thinking report explains how the Digital Promise team works with districts, schools, and teachers to make computational thinking ideas more concrete to practitioners for teaching, design, and assessment. We describe three powerful ways of using computers that integrate well with academic subject matter and align to our goals for students: (1) collecting, analyzing, and communicating data; (2) automating procedures and processes; and (3) using models to understand systems. We also explore our four main commitments to computational thinking at Digital Promise: PreK-8 Integration; Commitment from District Leadership; Inclusive Participation of Students Historically Marginalized From Computing; and Participatory and Iterative Design.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Participatory and deliberative processes' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography