Relevant bibliographies by topics / Organon (Aristotles)

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Organon (Aristotles)'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 29 July 2024
Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Organon (Aristotles).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Organon (Aristotles)"

1

Díaz López, Lucas. "El Uso Aristotélico de Variables en Lógica y sus Supuestos Ontológicos." Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 19, no. 38 (2011): 33–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philosophica2011193810.

Full text
Abstract:
A logical reading on Aristotle’s Organon discovers some inconsistencies in the text which have to be solved by reducing them to metaphysical decisions of the author, if they are not just identified as deficiencies in the exposition that should be corrected. The present article tries to display a line of reading paying attention to those so-called inconsistencies, in an attempt to understand them as specific steps in Aristotle’s research. In order to this goal it focuses on the exposition procedure of the Aristotelian figures: the use of variables, whose introduction by Aristotle has been celebrated all over logical tradition. An analysis of the distinctive and internal features in this procedure will allow us to link Aristotle’s logos research and the “being qua being” investigation, and to determine also - though in a negative way - the connection between this reading and the logical-traditional one on Aristotle’s Organon.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Llovet Abascal, José María. "¿Se puede considerar formal la lógica de Aristóteles?" Daímon, no. 82 (January 1, 2021): 99–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.344561.

Full text
Abstract:
En este trabajo planteo la pregunta de si la lógica de Aristóteles es o no una lógica formal. Respondo que, aunque las doctrinas contenidas en el Organon inauguren, efectivamente, la lógica formal, hay también buenas razones para pensar que Aristóteles no creía que la lógica fuese una disciplina que pudiera prescindir por completo del contenido. In this paper I discuss the question of whether Aristotle’s logic is a formal logic or not. I answer that, although the doctrines contained in the Organon inaugurate indeed formal logic, there are also good reasons to think that Aristotle did not believe that logic was a discipline that ought to prescind completely from content.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Deitz, Luc. "Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic Francesco Patrizi da Cherso's Criticism of Aristotle's Logic." Vivarium 45, no. 1 (2007): 113–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853407x202539.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractFrancesco Patrizi da Cherso's Discussiones peripateticae (1581) are one of the most comprehensive analyses of the whole of Aristotelian philosophy to be published before Werner Jaeger's Aristoteles. The main thrust of the argument in the Discussiones is that whatever Aristotle had said that was true was not new, and that whatever he had said that was new was not true. The article shows how Patrizi proves this with respect to the Organon, and deals with the implications for the history af ancient philosophy in general implied by his stance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Sitko, Yu L. "SYSTEM OF SIGNS BY CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE AS HIS REFLECTION OF STUDY ABOUT CATEGORIES AND PREDICABILIA: IDEAS OF THE MIDDLE AGES AND THE MODERN PERIOD." Memoirs of NovSU, no. 6 (2023): 744–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.34680/2411-7951.2023.6(51).744-759.

Full text
Abstract:
The article attempts to investigate scientific background underlying the system of signs proposed by Ch.S. Peirce. The study is based on the hypothesis that Ch.S.Peirce borrowed the principle of systematisation from the Latin translation of “Organon” by Aristotle published by Julius Pacius in 1584. Having analysed this issue of “Organon” the author demonstrates that the system of categories and predicabilia by Aristotle was transformed into a diagram presenting the interconnections between categories as judgements. Along with that it is shown that Pacius calculated the systems consisting of more than five notions as elements. Moreover, it is specified that Pacius borrowed the idea of representing categories in the form of diagrams from Johann Eck. It is possible to conclude from the investigation conducted that Ch.S.Peirce’s system of signs is isomorphic to Aristotle’s system of signs in the interpretation of Pacius. The article also introduces the idea about “the direction of predication” from accidence towards gender (from right to left) and from gender towards accidence (from left to right), which opens the perspective for future comparative analysis with semasiological and onomasiological methods of studying the language.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dmitriev, Igor S. "The Gay Science of Francis Bacon." Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 57, no. 1 (2020): 181–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/eps202057114.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is the study of some aspects of the methodology of scientific knowledge that F. Bacon addressed in his treatise “New Organon” (1620) and in other works in one way or another related to his work on the project of the Instauratio Magna Scientiarum. The article focuses on the following three questions: Bacon’s attitude to Aristotle’s legacy, the context of Bacon’s doctrine of idols and the reasons for the English philosopher to choose a fragmented (aphoristic) form of presentation of his ideas in the “New Organon” and in some other works. Based on an analysis of Bacon’s works related to the above project, it was shown that his statements about Aristotle and his philosophy were differentiated depending on whether the corresponding text was intended for printing or served as a working draft. In the latter case, the estimates of Aristotle by Bacon were more stringent. Baconian criticism of Aristotelianism was formed in the context of the development by the English philosopher of the doctrine of the idols of knowledge. The article shows that developing this doctrine, Bacon proceeded from the idea of mass insanity of the human race (insania publica), which has ancient roots and was shared by a number of contemporaries of F. Bacon. At the same time, the latter considered Aristotle as the creator of “a kind of art of insanity (artemque quondam insaniae componere)”. As a cure for “insania universalis”, Bacon proposed a new method (the “new organon”) of cognition, and the presentation of his ideas in the form of separate, but conceptually related aphorisms, as a way of activating the reader’s thought process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Anders, John. "Problēmata Mēchanika, the Analytics, and Projectile Motion." Apeiron 46, no. 2 (April 2013): 106–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2012-0027.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The project of this paper is to look at problēmata in the Organon, how the Mēchanika employs problēmata, what these texts can teach us about each other, and the significance of all these things for the difficulties that Aristotelian natural philosophy encounters in explaining projectile motion. My treatment of the last item will highlight a pun used in the Mēchanika and argue that it makes a serious point. The paper proceeds as follows: first I will briefly present a reading of how problēmata are understood by Aristotle in the Organon. Next I will examine how problēmata are treated in the Mēchanika. Then I will put these two views of problēmata in dialogue with each other. Lastly I will utilize this discussion to address some of the well-known difficulties associated with Aristotle’s account of projectiles, and what this might mean for Aristotelian natural philosophy as a whole.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Grau Torras, Sergi. "Aristotle in the Medical Works of Arnau de Vilanova (c. 1240–1311)." Early Science in Medicine 19, no. 3 (July 29, 2014): 236–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15733823-00193p02.

Full text
Abstract:
Arnau de Vilanova, one of the most important physicians of the Latin Middle Ages, was familiar with the vast majority of Aristotle’s works that had been translated into Latin. He used a wide range of them, such as the Organon – the introductory books on logic – and the natural philosophical books, which cover a different branches of knowledge. He used Aristotle as an authority, trying to reconcile him with the field of medicine as practiced in his time. In so going, he defined a new theoretical model of medicine by the standards of natural philosophy, while continuing to emphasize the boundaries between medicine and natural philosophy. This paper represents to a first attempt to investigate the Aristotelian quotations in the medical writings of Arnau de Vilanova.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Geudens, Christophe. "Embracing the Lusitanian Legacy." Vivarium 55, no. 4 (November 22, 2017): 307–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341343.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This article puts forward an analysis of the theory of signs contained in the Prodidagmata ad logicam Aristotelis (1627), a compendium on logic written by the Flemish philosopher and Louvain professor Laurentius Ghiffene (1594-1637). Focusing on Ghiffene’s definition and division of a sign and his account of the problem of self-reference, the author argues that Ghiffene positioned himself in the tradition of the Conimbricenses and relied extensively on their influential commentary on Aristotle’s Organon, published in 1606. The aim of the present contribution is to shed new light on the teaching of logic at Louvain during the years immediately preceding the rise of modern philosophy, an episode in the university’s history which remains almost entirely unstudied.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Omoloeva, А. S., and А. E. Simbirtseva. "W. Whewell: Induction and Deduction in Novum Organon Renovatum." Siberian Journal of Philosophy 20, no. 4 (September 13, 2023): 113–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-4-113-126.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper aims to expose the induction – deduction relation within W. Whewell’s treatise «Novum Organon Renovatum». Since Aristotle’s time. induction and deduction have been interpreted as independent and even «opposite» inferences (ways of connecting premises and conclusions), but this intuition is violated in W. Whewell’s works. Based on contemporary practice of some specific natural sciences W. Whewell quite reasonably concludes that “Aristotle overlooks a step which is of far more importance to our knowledge, namely, the invention of the second extreme term” and that “induction moves upward, and deduction downwards the same stair”. Ultimately, assessing the contribution of W. Whewell to the development and consolidation of the classical image of science, it can be noted that his thesis that “deduction justifies induction” is much more in line with the instrumentalism of E. Mach and A. Poincaré than J. Mill’s inductivism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Meyer, Martin F. "Die Natur des Organischen." Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 13 (December 31, 2008): 32–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.13.03mey.

Full text
Abstract:
The nature of the organic. On the scientific significance of Aristotelian biology. The core thesis of the paper is that the constitution of biological science begins with a conceptual innovation with far-reaching consequences with effect up to the present: by conceiving the parts of living beings as organs (that is, as tools), Aristotle laid the foundation stone for a functional explanation of animate nature. Comparative anatomy is thus transformed from a merely descriptive to an explanatory theory. The point of the discussion is above all that a functional explanation must not be confused with the sort of teleology according to which the function of an organ is understood as the cause of its existence. The first section outlines the theoretical motives that Aristotle adduces in arguing for biology (against contemporary contempt for biological research). The second step addresses the significance of the parts of animals in Aristotle’s larger collection of zoological material, the Historia animalium. The third section demonstrates how in the major explanatory work De partibus animalium the term organon takes on the status of a key methodological concept. Finally, the fourth section discusses the significance of the Aristotelian determination of the organic with respect to current discourses in natural science.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Organon (Aristotles)"

1

Ferreira, Mateus Ricardo Fernandes. "A Lógica de Aristóteles : problemas interpretativos e abordagens contemporâneas dos primeiros analíticos." [s.n.], 2012. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/280011.

Full text
Abstract:
Orientador: Lucas Angioni
Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-20T11:18:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ferreira_MateusRicardoFernandes_D.pdf: 823119 bytes, checksum: 7ba656176385de662b9d8593f14aa89d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012
Resumo: Nesta tese discuto aspectos da logica de Aristóteles que sao ressaltados por abordagens contemporâneas dos Primeiros Analíticos e que mostram uma teoria mais rica e sutil do que tradicionalmente se entende como sendo a lógica aristotelica. Em especial, abordo teses sobre como devem ser compreendidas as proposições categóricas, o que sao precisamente silogismos, o que sao silogismos perfeitos e quais problemas enfrenta a parte da lógica de Aristoteles que lida com proposicoes modais. Nessa direcao, abordo evidencias textuais para duas concepcoes de proposicao categorica e as dificuldades para coaduna-las com as proposicoes singulares. Alem disso, argumento que silogismos devem ser compreendidos como cadeias de predicacoes e que Aristoteles concebe um sistema logico quando procura justificar quais arranjos entre termos formam de fato tais cadeias. Argumento, tambem, que os silogismos perfeitos sao evidentes nesse sistema nao porque considerados indemonstraveis, mas porque podem ser deduzidos a partir de definicoes das proposicoes categoricas e de certas regras gerais, isto e, de regras aplicaveis nao apenas a um tipo de proposicao categorica. Por fim, apresento as caracteristicas gerais e as dificuldades de uma parte da logica de Aristoteles muito pouco associada a logica aristotelica como tradicionalmente entendida: a silogistica modal
Abstract: The present dissertation discusses aspects of Aristotle's Logic which are enhanced by contemporary approaches to Prior Analytics and display a logical theory richer and subtler than what traditionally is comprehended as being the Aristotelian Logic. My main claims concern how categorical propositions must be understood, what is the exact nature of syllogisms, what is a perfect syllogism, as well as some questions in the part of Aristotelian Logic which deals with modal propositions. From an examination of texts that support two different conceptions of categorical proposition, I discuss the difficulties in adjusting each of them to singular propositions. I also argue that syllogisms must be comprehended as chains of predications and that Aristotle conceives a logical system when he proceeds to justify which terms arrangement does produce chains of the required kind. I also argue that in this system perfect syllogisms must be understood as evident not because they are unproved, but because they are deduced from definitions for categorical propositions and from general rules, i.e. rules not applied just to some categorical propositions. Finally, I discuss general features and problems concerning a part of Aristotle's Logic rarely attached to the Aristotelian Logic as traditionally comprehended: the modal syllogistic
Doutorado
Filosofia
Doutor em Filosofia
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Carvalho, Rodrigo Romão de. "O papel do Hilemorfismo nos príncipios do exame da constituição do ser vivo em Aristóteles." Universidade de São Paulo, 2011. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8133/tde-18122012-124855/.

Full text
Abstract:
A presente pesquisa tem o objetivo de estudar os princípios de investigação dos seres vivos tendo como parâmetro a concepção hilemórfica dos entes naturais em Aristóteles. Para tanto, em primeiro lugar, analisaremos o hilemorfismo tal como exposto no Livro II da Física, a fim de investigarmos a doutrina da matéria e forma, no contexto em que ela desempenha um papel fundamental para a elaboração de uma concepção que é capaz de mostrar os modos pelos quais os entes se constituem na natureza. Em segundo lugar, examinaremos os princípios de investigação dos seres vivos no Livro I das Partes dos Animais, de modo a identificar os fundamentos conceituais nos quais ele se sustenta. Assim, veremos em que medida a doutrina da matéria e forma desempenha uma função determinante na análise relativa aos organismos vivos.
The present research aims to study the principles of investigation of living beings, from hylemorphic conception as a parameter of explanation of natural beings in Aristotle. To do so, first, well analyze the hylemorphism as set out in Book II of Physics in order to investigate the doctrine of matter and form, in which it plays a key role in the development of a conception that is able to show the ways in which beings are formed in nature. Second, well examine the principles of living beings in Book I of the Part of Animals, in order to identify the conceptual foundations on which it holds. So we\'ll see how far the doctrine of matter and form plays a decisive role in the analysis relating to living organisms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Caminada, Niccolo'. "Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā), Book of the Cure, Categories (al-Maqūlāt), Part I: Introduction and Translation." Doctoral thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11384/86159.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Carvalho, Rodrigo Romão de. "A Constituição Orgânica em Aristóteles: a substância natural no seu mais elevado grau." Universidade de São Paulo, 2017. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8133/tde-22052017-120532/.

Full text
Abstract:
A presente pesquisa tem como objetivo desenvolver um estudo acerca da noção aristotélica de constituição orgânica, no qual procurarei propor um exame da filosofia da natureza de Aristóteles referente ao aspecto, atribuído ao organismo, de ser substância natural no seu mais elevado grau, estabelecendo uma análise comparativa entre os compostos elementares, os compostos homogêneos inanimados e os compostos orgânicos. Para tanto, pretendo, primeiramente, promover uma análise a respeito do caráter substancial dos organismos vivos. Em seguida, delimitar uma investigação em torno dos tipos de composições naturais, levando em conta a maneira pela qual a necessidade natural estaria envolvida no processo constitutivo de tais composições. E, por fim, oferecer uma interpretação relativa ao capítulo 12 do livro IV dos Meteorológicos, a qual tem por base discernir a natureza formal associada, por um lado, às propriedades características dos corpos homogêneos em geral, considerados em si e por si mesmos, e, por outro, às propriedades características da constituição orgânica, de modo a precisar as diferenças entre elas. Penso que, com este estudo, também será possível compreender de um modo claro o motivo pelo qual, nesta concepção de natureza, toma-se o organismo vivo como o paradigma de substâncias (ousiai) naturais.
This research aims to develop a study on the aristotelian notion of organic constitution, which seek to propose an examination of the natural philosophy of Aristotle concerning the aspect, assigned to the body, to be natural substance in its highest degree, establishing an analysis comparative between elementary compounds, inanimate homoeomerous compounds and organic compounds. Therefore, I intend, first, to promote an analysis regarding the substantial nature of living organisms. Then delimit an investigation around the kinds of natural compositions, taking into account the way in which natural necessity would be involved in the constitutive process of such compositions. And finally, offer an interpretation relating to Chapter 12 of De Caelo IV, which relies on discerning the formal nature associated, on the one hand, the characteristic properties of homoeomerous bodies generally considered in themselves and for themselves, and, on the other hand, the characteristic properties of the organic constitution in order to clarify the differences between then. I think that, with this study, also will be possible understand in a clearly way the reason, in this conception of nature, it takes the living organism as the paradigm of natural substances (ousiai).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"The paradigm of organic unity: On Aristotle's ""De Partibus Animalium""." Tulane University, 2002.

Find full text
Abstract:
In the last fifty years or so there has been a tremendous renewal of interest in Aristotle's biological writings. As I understand it, this interest was motivated by at least two different sorts of researchers who had different assumptions and motivations. On the one hand there are the biologists, and chief among them, D'Arcy Thompson. On the other hand there are those who, in their study of Aristotle's philosophic work, have been forced to recognize that a significant portion of the corpus---more than one quarter of the total by most accounts---is devoted to these biological subjects and wish to make sense of how these musings are to be understood in light of the canonical works, e.g. the Metaphysics, Physics, De Anima, Nichomachean Ethics . Many point to David Balme as one of the principle sources of this interest in putting the biological works within a philosophical framework. The point is to understand better why Aristotle repeatedly turns to biological examples to clarify questions encountered in the study of physics or metaphysics; for 'plants and animals are substances (ousiai) most of all' (Meta. Z.8). One must understand Aristotle's philosophical biology at the same time as trying to understand his biological philosophy The sign of this renewed interest is the recent appearance of numerous books and articles devoted to the study of Aristotle's biological writings. The study I am undertaking of Aristotle's Parts of Animals (PA) aims to contribute to this growing body of scholarship. Perhaps the easiest, yet the most significant, way to distinguish the contribution I think I can make is this. Most scholars believe that the PA is not really a book, that it does not form a whole that is coherent; hence, among the numbers of books and articles, there is not a treatment of the argument of the PA as a whole, as its arguments unfold. To understand the general sentiment regarding the status of the PA we do not have to look far; David Balme and others hold that PA I is a 'string of papers' and that PA II--IV is largely independent from the argument of PA I. (see also Pellegrin 1986, pp 146 ff.). In contrast to this position, I suggest that the argument of the PA can be seen as a whole, that the topics first touched upon in PA I are picked up, expanded, modified, and examined in greater detail in the course of the argument of the PA as a whole
acase@tulane.edu
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Organon (Aristotles)"

1

Mesquita, António Pedro, and Ricardo Santos. New Essays on Aristotle’s Organon. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120704.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tejera, V. Aristotle's Organon in epitome, The poetics, The rhetoric, The analytics: Aristotle's tool-kit. Lewiston: E. Mellen Press, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Patterson, Richard. Aristotle's modal logic: Essence and entailment in the Organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ömer, Türker, and Alper Ömer Mahir 1967-, eds. Kitâbu'l-Burhân: Burhân kitabı : metin - çeviri. Fatih, İstanbul: Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Musitelli, Sergio. Struttura e funzione del testicolo da Aristotele al "Testis examinatus" di Claudius Aubry. Pavia: La goliardica pavese, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Musitelli, Sergio. Struttura e funzione del testicolo da Aristotele al Testis examinatus di Claudius Aubry. Pavia: La goliardica pavese, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hodge, M. J. S. Origins and species: A study of the historical sources of Darwinism and the contexts of some other accounts of organic diversity from Plato and Aristotle on. New York: Garland, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

New Essays on Aristotles Organon. Routledge, 2024.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Aristoteles - Organon. Books on Demand GmbH, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

New Essays on Aristotle's Organon. Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Incorporated, 2023.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Organon (Aristotles)"

1

Malink, Marko. "›Organon‹." In Aristoteles-Handbuch, 75–84. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05742-6_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rapp, Christof. "Aristoteles: Organon." In Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL), 1–6. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_9452-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Zingano, Marco. "Aristotle's Categories." In New Essays on Aristotle’s Organon, 35–49. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120704-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Brockmann, Christian. "Organe." In Aristoteles-Handbuch, 334–39. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05742-6_51.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mesquita, António Pedro, and Ricardo Santos. "An Introduction to Aristotle's Organon." In New Essays on Aristotle’s Organon, 1–34. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120704-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bronstein, David, and Breno Zuppolini. "Aristotle on Multiple Demonstration." In New Essays on Aristotle’s Organon, 158–80. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120704-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Santos, Ricardo. "Aristotle on Negative Terms and Obversion." In New Essays on Aristotle’s Organon, 108–32. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120704-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ierodiakonou, Katerina. "Are the Same Thoughts Shared by All People?" In New Essays on Aristotle’s Organon, 50–69. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120704-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Morel, Pierre-Marie. "Proof and Demonstration." In New Essays on Aristotle’s Organon, 133–46. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120704-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fait, Paolo. "Misplaced Trust and Blind Reasoning." In New Essays on Aristotle’s Organon, 234–56. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120704-13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Organon (Aristotles)' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography