To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Organizational ecosystems.
Journal articles on the topic 'Organizational ecosystems'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Organizational ecosystems.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Lavassani, Kayvan Miri, and Bahar Movahedi. "Applications Driven Information Systems." International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy 8, no. 1 (January 2017): 61–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijide.2017010104.
Full textAbstract:
Advancements in organizational information systems and developments in business environments have brought important changes to the contemporary management practices and business models. Organizations have evolved beyond their specific and general environments towards business ecosystems. This study investigates the evolutions of organizational information systems and business environments in the contexts of business ecosystem. Based on an evolutionary study of organizational information systems and business ecosystem an ontological model is proposed for adoption of new technologies in the real world designs with particular attention to the application of technology. The authors call for further empirical and conceptual research in understanding and exploring the role of business ecosystems in organizational operations and industrial ecosystems.
2
Liu, Longjun, Wenhai Wan, and Yenchun Jim Wu. "How Nonlocal Entrepreneurial Teams Achieve Sustainable Performance: The Interaction between Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Organizational Legitimacy." Sustainability 12, no. 21 (November 6, 2020): 9237. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12219237.
Full textAbstract:
Nonlocal entrepreneurship plays an important role in promoting regional economic development. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the influence of the subjective and objective factors (organizational legitimacy and regional entrepreneurial ecosystem) of nonlocal entrepreneurship on its sustainable performance and boundary conditions. Through the analysis of 608 questionnaires of 237 teams at different times, the following conclusions are drawn: First, we find that entrepreneurial ecosystems and organizational legitimacy effectively promote nonlocal entrepreneurial teams’ sustainable performance, and strategic flexibility has positive moderating effects on this relationship. Secondly, through polynomial regression and response surface analysis, we find that the interaction between entrepreneurial ecosystems and organizational legitimacy has a positive impact on sustainable performance. Specifically, compared with the inconsistent status of entrepreneurial ecosystems and organizational legitimacy, the sustainable performance is higher under a consistent status. Compared with the low consistency status of entrepreneurial ecosystems and organizational legitimacy, the sustainable performance in the high consistency status is higher. Therefore, we suggest that the government, universities, and enterprises should build entrepreneurial ecosystems to promote the sustainability of nonlocal entrepreneurial teams. For nonlocal entrepreneurial teams, organizational legitimacy and strategic flexibility should be enhanced. The presented research adds to the literature by integrating subject and object factors (organizational legitimacy and regional entrepreneurial ecosystem), which has important theoretical significance.
3
Mars, Matthew M., and Judith L. Bronstein. "The Promise of the Organizational Ecosystem Metaphor: An Argument for Biological Rigor." Journal of Management Inquiry 27, no. 4 (April 29, 2017): 382–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706546.
Full textAbstract:
Organizational scholars often adopt biological models to explain the emergence and evolution of organizations and human systems. One recent example of such adoption is the organizational ecosystem metaphor. In this article, we contend that taking a rigorous ecological approach over the application of loose ecosystem language has the potential to illuminate patterns in the life span of organizations and human systems. We first define five central properties of biological ecosystems and demonstrate their potential relevance to human-constructed systems (organizational ecosystems). We then argue the value of developing biologically based hypotheses that can be tested in the context of organizational systems. Next, we propose a set of hypotheses specific to organizational stability and disruption, using Arizona charter schools as an example to demonstrate the promise of the rigorous application of the organizational ecosystem metaphor. We close with a discussion of how the insights generated might be applied across other organizational settings and systems.
4
Secundo, Giustina, Antonio Toma, Giovanni Schiuma, and Giuseppina Passiante. "Knowledge transfer in open innovation." Business Process Management Journal 25, no. 1 (February 4, 2019): 144–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-06-2017-0173.
Full textAbstract:
PurposeDespite the abundance of research in open innovation, few contributions explore it at inter-organizational level, and particularly with a focus on healthcare ecosystem, characterized by a dense network of relationships among public and private organizations (hospitals, companies and universities) as well as other actors that can be labeled as “untraditional” player, i.e. doctors, nurses and patients. The purpose of this paper is to cover this gap and explore how knowledge is transferred and flows among all the healthcare ecosystems’ players in order to support open innovation processes.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is conceptual in nature and adopts a narrative literature review approach. In particular, insights gathered from open innovation literature at the inter-organizational network level, with a particular attention to healthcare ecosystems, and from the knowledge transfer processes, are analyzed in order to propose an interpretative framework for the understanding of knowledge transfer in open innovation with a focus on healthcare ecosystem.FindingsThe paper proposes an original interpretative framework for knowledge transfer to support open innovation in healthcare ecosystems, composed of four main components: healthcare ecosystem’s players’ categories; knowledge flows among different categories of players along the exploration and exploitation stages of innovation development; players’ motivations for open innovation; and players’ positions in the innovation process. In addition, assuming the intermediary network as the suitable organizational model for healthcare ecosystem, four classification scenarios are identified on the basis of the main players’ influence degree and motivations for open innovation.Practical implicationsThe paper offers interpretative lenses for managers and policy makers in understanding the most suitable organizational models able to encourage open innovation in healthcare ecosystems, taking into consideration the players’ motivation and the knowledge transfer processes on the basis of the innovation results.Originality/valueThe paper introduces a novel framework that fills a gap in the innovation management literature, by pointing out the key role of external not R&D players, like patients, involved in knowledge transfer for open innovation processes in healthcare ecosystems.
5
Khalin, Vladimir G., Galina V. Chernova, and Svetlana A. Kalayda. "Economic Ecosystems and Their Classification." Administrative Consulting, no. 2 (May 14, 2021): 38–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-2-38-54.
Full textAbstract:
The most important trends in modern social development are economic convergence and digitalization. It is their interaction that creates new opportunities for increasing competitiveness and efficiency in the framework of joint business of representatives of various segments and sectors of the economy. The main institutional and organizational form of doing business within the framework of intersectoral economic convergence under the influence of digitalization is becoming an ecosystem. The aim of the article is to clarify the concept of an ecosystem as a form of joint business in the context of intersectoral economic convergence and digitalization, as well as to build a classification of ecosystems. The study puts forward the following hypothesis the ecosystem as an institutional and organizational form of running a joint business is the result of the simultaneous influence of intersectoral economic convergence and digitalization on it, and “the connection of the basic product provided to the client by the initiator of the intersectoral economic convergence before the creation of the ecosystem with digital and/or information technology ”can be used for the economic ecosystems classification. The novelty of the approach is the following. Considering an ecosystem as a form of joint business running with the simultaneous impact of economic intersectoral convergence and digitalization on it makes it possible to clarify the concept of an ecosystem, highlight as the ecosystem parameter used to the ecosystem classify and as its main characteristic, the values of which can be used to construct a classification of economic ecosystems.
6
DeJordy, Rich, Maureen Scully, Marc J. Ventresca, and W. E. Douglas Creed. "Inhabited Ecosystems: Propelling Transformative Social Change Between and Through Organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly 65, no. 4 (February 7, 2020): 931–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001839219899613.
Full textAbstract:
Two research streams examine how social movements operate both “in and around” organizations. We probe the empirical spaces between these streams, asking how activism situated in multi-organizational contexts contributes to transformative social change. By exploring activities in the mid-1990s related to advocacy for domestic partner benefits at 24 organizations in Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minnesota, we develop the concept of inhabited ecosystems to explore the relational processes by which employee activists advance change. These activists faced a variety of structural opportunities and restraints, and we identify five mechanisms that sustained their efforts during protracted contestation: learning even from thwarted activism, borrowing from one another’s more or less radical approaches, helping one another avoid the traps of stagnation, fostering solidarity and ecosystem capabilities, and collaboratively expanding the social movement domain. We thus reveal how activism situated in multi-organizational contexts animates an inhabited ecosystem of challengers that propels change efforts “between and through” organizations. These efforts, even when exploratory or incomplete, generate an ecosystem’s capacity to sustain, resource, and even reshape the larger transformative social change effort.
7
Knockaert, Mirjam, Matthias Deschryvere, and Laura Lecluyse. "The relationship between organizational interdependence and additionality obtained from innovation ecosystem participation." Science and Public Policy 46, no. 4 (February 7, 2019): 490–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz002.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Despite the increased interest in innovation ecosystems, few studies have assessed the extent to which the proclaimed benefits from participating in such ecosystems also occur, and under which circumstances they do occur. Uniting the literature on organizational interdependence and social exchange theory, we assess the behavioral and output additionality obtained by innovation ecosystem participants. In doing so, we build upon a sample of 473 innovative Finnish companies, of which 312 participated in an innovation ecosystem. We find a significantly positive relationship between organizational interdependence and output additionality, and find that this relationship is mediated by behavioral additionality. Furthermore, we find that the relationship between behavioral additionality and output additionality is particularly strong when firms appoint members from the innovation ecosystem to their board of directors, pointing to the importance of internalizing the ecosystem. We discuss implications for academia and practice.
8
Altman, Elizabeth J., Elizabeth J. Altman, David R. Clough, Jose-Mauricio Galli Geleilate, Rebecca M. Henderson, and Riitta Katila. "Ecosystems: New Structures and Organizational Considerations." Academy of Management Proceedings 2020, no. 1 (August 2020): 14012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.14012symposium.
Full text
9
Francis, George. "Toward Understanding Great Lakes “Organizational Ecosystems”." Journal of Great Lakes Research 13, no. 3 (January 1987): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0380-1330(87)71646-3.
Full text
10
Ramenskaya, Lyudmila. "The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies." Upravlenets 11, no. 4 (September 4, 2020): 16–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-2.
Full textAbstract:
The concept of ecosystem enjoys growing popularity among academics and practitioners around the globe. However, due to the inconsistent use and the vagueness of definitions, the application of the concept in economic and management studies is impeded. The paper systematizes the prerequisites, theoretical foundations and conceptual framework of ecosystems as a concept for describing a new structure of social relations. The methodological basis of the research is organizational ecology theory, dynamic capabilities theory and neo-institutional theory. Structural-logical, bibliographic and criterion analysis are the main research methods. The article substantiates the expediency of using the prefix “eco-” when describing the interaction between a company and its environment, and indentifies the primary provisions of organizational ecology affecting the emergence of the ecosystem concept. The author examines the intermediate position of the ecosystem in the neo-institutional dichotomy of market– hierarchy. The study discusses the extent to which the ecosystem influences dynamic capabilities of a firm, and demonstrates inconsistencies in using the term “ecosystem” in academic texts. As a result of bibliographic analysis, we distinguish between four central research discourses of the ecosystem concept (business, innovation, entrepreneurial and platform-based ecosystems), as well as establish their terminological peculiarities and main research avenues. The results obtained can be used to develop the theory of ecosystems and describe ecosystems of real business.
11
Mukhopadhyay, Sandip, Shahrokh Nikou, and Harry Bouwman. "Why Controls Are Used in Platform Ecosystems?" International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications 8, no. 3 (July 2016): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijesma.2016070101.
Full textAbstract:
Existing literature on control in software development context considers only the principal-agency relationship between controller and controlee. However, the principal-agency relationship cannot be assumed between ecosystems leader and partners, which are independent organizations. This paper aims to study the critical role played by inter-organizational control mechanisms in a mobile platform ecosystems. Based on an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach with 38 experts with diverse backgrounds, this research aims to identify and prioritise the most important roles of control portfolio in the platform ecosystems. Though traditionally controls are primarily used to coordinate between partners with divergent objectives, ecosystems leaders use control primarily to capture a higher share of value of the service. The findings provide further insights on two other roles of control in platform ecosystems: (i) accessing complementary resources and (ii) managing interdependency between partners. This research extends organizational control theory to the context of emerging platform-based ecosystem.
12
Agrawal, Namit, Madhuri Banda, Anthony Marshall, Nipun Mehrotra, and Clifford Patrao. "How India can be essential to the global ecosystem economy." Strategy & Leadership 45, no. 4 (July 17, 2017): 33–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sl-05-2017-0046.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose Outlines why India is poised to be a key partner in the global ecosystem economy Design/methodology/approach Researches the advantage India has and the steps it is taking to make itself a leaders in ecosystem businesses. Findings 54 percent of Indian executives expect ecosystems to replace traditional value chains with new value models. and 92 percent expect to change primary organizational activities due to the emergence of ecosystems. Practical implications To maximize and capture benefits from ecosystems, business, educational and government leaders can pursue three key steps to participate in rapidly emerging Indian business ecosystems. Originality/value This study puts together both the corporate and governmental actions that promote the right conditions for ecosystem entrepreneurship so that potential partners have a unique view of the opportunities to participate in this rapidly changing economy.
13
Chernova, Galina V., Svetlana A. Kalayda, Vladimir G. Khalin, and Alexander V. Yurkov. "Matters of economic ecosystem classification." Journal of Applied Informatics 16, no. 91 (February 26, 2021): 69–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.37791/2687-0649-2021-16-1-69-82.
Full textAbstract:
Economic convergence and digitalization are the most important trends of the modern community development. It is their interaction that creates new opportunities for the improvement of competitive capability and performance in the framework of joint business conducted by representatives of the wide variety of segments and sectors of economy. In response to digitalization, an ecosystem becomes the main institutional and organizational form of business in the framework of inter-sectoral economic convergence. The purpose of this article is to define more exactly the concept of an ecosystem as a form of doing joint business in the environment of inter-sectoral economic convergence and digitalization, and to build a classification of ecosystems. The following hypothesis is put forward in the study: an ecosystem as an institutional and organizational form of doing joint business is the result of the concurrent impact of inter-sectoral economic convergence and digitalization thereon, and the "connection of the base product provided to customer by the inter-sectoral economic convergence initiator prior to creating an ecosystem with digital and/or information technology" may be a criterion for classification of economic ecosystems. The novelty of the approach is as follows. The consideration of an ecosystem as a form of doing joint business simultaneously influenced by economic inter- sectoral convergence and digitalization has made it possible to define more exactly the concept of an ecosystem, identify an ecosystem parameter to be applied for classification of ecosystems and the main characteristic thereof the values of which may be used to classify economic ecosystems.
14
Popov, Evgeny, Victoria Simonova, and Igor Chelak. "Economic modeling of innovation ecosystems." SHS Web of Conferences 94 (2021): 01017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219401017.
Full textAbstract:
Within the framework of traditional economic approaches that incline the researcher's attention to the ordering of systems, it is difficult to track and adequately assess the turbulent changes in the environment in the conditions of transformation of almost all spheres of the economy. The way out of this cognitive trap is possible in applying the tools of the ecosystem approach, which considers economic relations within a set of ecosystems as extra-organizational, self-organized forms of conducting commercial and social (non-commercial) entrepreneurship. A hierarchy of models of innovative ecosystems is proposed for scientific and practical analysis of the phenomenon under consideration and for developing recommendations for the formation of necessary conditions for the development of ecosystem relations. The combinatorics of environmental factors and internal structure allows us to construct a significant set of ecosystem models.
15
Tolstykh, Tatyana, Leyla Gamidullaeva, and Nadezhda Shmeleva. "Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective." SAGE Open 11, no. 1 (January 2021): 215824402098870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988704.
Full textAbstract:
Universities play a vital role in innovation ecosystems. Besides, their role is being transformed and reinforced due to the interdisciplinary nature of modern innovations and inter-sectoral collaboration in the process of implementing cross-industry projects. The article’s main objective is to reveal the emerging new goals, functions, and goals of university as knowledge integrator and consolidator within cross-industry ecosystem. The article introduces the approaches to the implementation of the cross-industry ecosystem integrator functions as an “entry point” for the creation of new ideas, competencies, technological solutions, and projects for the development and testing of new technologies. The research results are useful for academics and policy makers in emerging economies to adopt and consider, so as to improve the contribution of the universities to the country’s economic and innovation development.
16
Roundy, Philip T. "Rust belt or revitalization: competing narratives in entrepreneurial ecosystems." Management Research Review 42, no. 1 (January 21, 2019): 102–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/mrr-01-2018-0019.
Full textAbstract:
PurposeEntrepreneurial ecosystems, the inter-connected set of organizing forces that produce and sustain regional entrepreneurial activity, are receiving heightened attention. This research finds that narratives about ecosystem participants discursively construct entrepreneurial ecosystems. However, the studies do not emphasize ecosystem and region-level narratives, focus on ecosystems in which narratives are uncontested and, thus, do not examine how ecosystem narratives compete with other regional narratives. The purpose of this paper is to develop a theory that explains how narratives and entrepreneurial ecosystems emerge and change in response to existing regional narratives.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal process model is proposed to explain how entrepreneurial ecosystem narratives emerge and compete with other regional narratives. To illustrate the phases of the model, archival data were collected from three entrepreneurial ecosystems where new narratives have had to overcome entrenched economic and cultural narratives.FindingsIt is theorized that entrepreneurial ecosystems emerge, in part, through discourse. For an entrepreneurial ecosystem to develop, a narrative must take hold that allows participants to make sense of the new entrepreneurial activities and the changes to the region. A four-phase process model is presented to explain how entrepreneurial ecosystem narratives compete with other regional narratives and, particularly, negative economic narratives.Originality/valueThe theory developed in this paper contributes to the research on entrepreneurial ecosystems and organizational narratives and generates practical implications for policymakers and entrepreneurs seeking to promote entrepreneurship as a tool for economic development.
17
Gerashchenko, Irina Petrovna, and Vasiliy Aleksandrovich Kovalev. "Formation of educational ecosystems through the digital transformation of the educational environment." SHS Web of Conferences 121 (2021): 03004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112103004.
Full textAbstract:
Cognitive and digital transformation stimulates both academic and applied interest in the concept of socio-economic ecosystems. Today, traditional interaction chains in education, cooperation forms, for example, network ones, should give way to new organizational-economic interaction mechanisms – educational ecosystems. Research purpose is development of theoretical approaches to the formation of cross-geographic educational ecosystems through the digital transformation of the educational environment. The study is based on general scientific methods of systematization, comparison and generalization of research in the field of formation and functioning of ecosystems. Structural-functional and integrated approaches were used to develop the concept of formation of educational ecosystems. A comparative analysis of three overlapping ecosystem concepts (business ecosystems, knowledge ecosystems and innovation ecosystems) was carried out. The type, approaches and strategies for the formation of cross-geographic educational ecosystems have been determined. It is noted that digital transformation forms a digital educational environment, which can serve as the basis for the formation of cross-geographic educational ecosystems. As a typical basis for the formation of an educational ecosystem, it is proposed to use a business ecosystem as a form of socio-economic interaction of actors. As a strategy for the formation of an ecosystem, a structural strategy is defined with the allocation of a core – a leading university or an association of universities, and as actors – universities, students, post-graduate students, teachers, employees, graduating students, employers and other stakeholders. It is noted that the core plays a key role in the formation of a cross-geographic educational ecosystem. An effective strategy of the educational business ecosystem depends on the ability of the core to place other participants in positions and endow them with roles, on the one hand, corresponding to the strategy of the ecosystem as a whole, on the other hand, ensuring the actors’ satisfaction.
18
Nikitaeva, Anastasia, and Roman Serdyukov. "Development of Digital Ecosystems of Industrial Enterprises in the Regions of the South of Russia." Regionalnaya ekonomika. Yug Rossii, no. 3 (October 2020): 105–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2020.3.10.
Full textAbstract:
In the modern conditions of economic development, digital technologies are changing the approaches to the organization of activities and business models of industrial enterprises. Since flexible relationships between economic actors are currently increasing, digital value chains are being formed and dynamically developed, and cyberphysical systems are being formed, it is advisable to consider digital transformations of production enterprises from the point of view of the ecosystem approach. The purpose of this article is to provide a conceptual understanding of the essence of digital ecosystems of industrial enterprises and analyze their development in the regions of Southern Russia. In this paper, the ecosystem is considered as an interdependent group of actors that jointly use standardized digital platforms in the process of co-evolution for the achievement of mutually beneficial goals. At present, digital ecosystems are a new and promising form of interaction between market players in digital economy and a powerful tool for digitalization, increasing productivity, innovation and flexibility of enterprises. Conceptually, digital ecosystems combine technological, organizational and managerial components. Taking into account the mentioned above, an approach was proposed to analyze the level of development of digital ecosystems of industrial enterprises in the regions of the Southern Federal District of Russia by analyzing the indicators that characterize both digital and analogous components of digitalization of the enterprises themselves, consumers and counterparties. The analysis of the indicators allowed revealing that digital ecosystems are most developed in the following leading regions of Southern Russia: Rostov Region, Krasnodar Krai and the city of Sevastopol. At the same time, if the infrastructure and technological components are developing quite dynamically, more attention should be paid to personnel, organizational and managerial subsystems of these ecosystems.
19
Foley, Andrew Joseph. "Firms of Endearment: Organizational Imprinting in Business Ecosystems." Academy of Management Proceedings 2020, no. 1 (August 2020): 13640. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.13640abstract.
Full text
20
Garavan, Thomas N., Alma McCarthy, and Ronan Carbery. "An Ecosystems Perspective on International Human Resource Development: A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature." Human Resource Development Review 18, no. 2 (February 27, 2019): 248–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534484319828865.
Full textAbstract:
There has been significant growth of interest in both international human resource development (IHRD) and ecosystems research. Both literatures highlight important characteristics of each concept; however, to date, they have not yet been linked. We propose an ecosystem perspective as an important framework to understand IHRD. Ecosystems emphasize interdependencies, actor centrality, bargaining power, and relationships between actors as important in shaping IHRD. We utilize a meta-synthesis of the IHRD literature to identify content and process dimensions of an IHRD ecosystem. We conclude with a discussion of implications for IHRD research.
21
Zhdanov , D. A. "Digital transformation: Platform ecosystems as a tool for High-tech Business management." Management Sciences 11, no. 4 (January 20, 2022): 25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.26794/2404-022x-2021-11-4-25-39.
Full textAbstract:
As a part of digital transformation, high-tech businesses are increasingly using platform ecosystems as a management model. Today ecosystem companies displace traditional corporations from leadership positions, which predetermined the scientifc interest in understanding their key properties and patterns of development. The purpose of the paper is to study the management features that determine the competitive advantages of platform ecosystems. The methodological basis of the study has become a benchmarking that is a traditional economic analysis of the companies’ bond with partners and customers, and the methodological toolkit was benchmarking, a comparative analysis of the successful organizational and management practices of high-tech corporations (which have formed ecosystems around themselves). The analysis of the platform ecosystems activity made it possible to select the management features that distinguish the ecosystem management model from traditional approaches. The research highlights, in particular, such positions as the nature of intercompany coordination, modularity of operations and versatility of relations. The scientifc result of the study is the identifcation of three groups of management decisions that allow platform ecosystems to implement accelerated innovative development and provide them with competitive advantages over traditional business models. These include: relations with customers (the formation of an individually oriented value offer); creation of an innovationoriented organizational structure and corporate culture; leadership in the system (organization of management focused on creativity rather than adherence to standards). The results were verifed by analyzing their application by companies using various management technologies. The conclusion is that the implementation of the mentioned management decisions makes it possible to adapt a high-tech business to the requirements of the digital economy.
22
Davidson, Steven, Martin Harmer, and Anthony Marshall. "Strategies for creating and capturing value in the emerging ecosystem economy." Strategy & Leadership 43, no. 2 (March 16, 2015): 2–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sl-01-2015-0003.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – This article identifies a new transactional system–the business ecosystem. It describes the characteristics and drivers of these complex webs of interdependent enterprises and other participants which create unique value through synergistic relationships. Design/methodology/approach – The article explains how innovative organizations can seek new opportunities and develop new competencies in business ecosystems they will explicitly create or participate in. Findings – Ecosystems provide stimulus for, and a path to organizational and industry transformation – connecting people and organizations in new and different ways, and providing access to skills and expertise often unavailable outside the ecosystem. Practical implications – The authors have identified a spectrum of ecosystem archetypes that they call the Shark Tank, the Hornet’s Nest, the Wolf Pack and the Lion’s Pride. They analyze the success strategies for each. Originality/value – This article methodically diagrams the strategies for success in the emerging ecosystem economy. It identifies the key drivers of value in these new kinds of networks and offers corporate leaders actionable advice on how to position their firms in specific types of ecosystems.
23
Bailey, Kevin M., Lorenzo Ciannelli, Mary Hunsicker, Anna Rindorf, Stefan Neuenfeldt, Christian Möllmann, Frederic Guichard, and Geir Huse. "Comparative analysis of marine ecosystems: workshop on predator–prey interactions." Biology Letters 6, no. 5 (May 12, 2010): 579–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0326.
Full textAbstract:
Climate and human influences on marine ecosystems are largely manifested by changes in predator–prey interactions. It follows that ecosystem-based management of the world's oceans requires a better understanding of food web relationships. An international workshop on predator–prey interactions in marine ecosystems was held at the Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA on 16–18 March 2010. The meeting brought together scientists from diverse fields of expertise including theoretical ecology, animal behaviour, fish and seabird ecology, statistics, fisheries science and ecosystem modelling. The goals of the workshop were to critically examine the methods of scaling-up predator–prey interactions from local observations to systems, the role of shifting ecological processes with scale changes, and the complexity and organizational structure in trophic interactions.
24
Shevchuk, Dmitrii Stepanovich. "Innovative ecosystem as an organizational form for accumulating and scaling new knowledge in the industrial revolution era." KANT 38, no. 1 (March 2021): 72–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.24923/2222-243x.2021-38.16.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the study of the history of the "innovation ecosystem" concept formation and provides a simplified schematic representation of the system as five interacting modules. Innovations are assumed by national governments and companies as a source of long-term sustainability. In the past decade, there has been an increased interest in identifying approaches that would accelerate the development and deployment of innovations. The attention of the academic and business communities representatives to the innovation ecosystems underlines the fact that it is ecosystems and IT platforms that implement them that are the most promising candidates for the role of an organizational structure for the accumulation and scaling of new knowledge in the era of the industrial revolution.
25
Dessers, Ezra, and Bernard J. Mohr. "An ecosystem perspective on care coordination: Lessons from the field." International Journal of Care Coordination 23, no. 1 (December 26, 2019): 5–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053434519896523.
Full textAbstract:
The vast majority of research and efforts towards greater care coordination have taken place at the level of single, sovereign organizations, or at the level of networks formed to address the need for cross-organizational collaboration. The recently emerging ecosystem level of analysis and intervention is still under-researched, with few if any available innovation practices that match the complexity experienced at the level of care ecosystems. Beginning with the challenge of care coordination, we discuss what care ecosystems are and how they can be defined and describe the possibilities and opportunities that come when viewing care coordination through an ecosystem lens. We underpin our plea for an ecosystem approach to health and social care coordination with seven lessons, which we draw from an extensive study of 15 care ecosystem cases from seven different countries. We end the paper with an appeal for further research in this promising field.
26
Khabibullin, R. I. "The Architecture of Labour Relations in Socio-Economic Ecosystems." World of new economy 16, no. 1 (May 26, 2022): 62–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-1-62-72.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents a conceptual approach to the formation and development of labour relations in the context of socio-economic systems. The author shows that ecosystems as integrated organizational and economic structures, which developed intra-industry and inter-industry cooperative ties characterize functioning, consisting mainly of intelligent firms. In this regard, ecosystem management should be carried out not by directive methods, as in traditional business structures, but based on participatory governance and self-government principles, which also affects the specifics of human resource management. The author formulated the top-priority management tasks in the field of increasing the intellectual potential of ecosystem workers and methods for increasing the loyalty and involvement of personnel and highlighted the problems of labour relations arising in the conditions of ecosystem employment.
27
Shkarupeta, E. V., O. V. Dudareva, M. V. Filatova, and A. Y. Bekkiev. "Methodology for sustainable development of industrial ecosystems." Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies 82, no. 4 (January 20, 2021): 377–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2020-4-377-382.
Full textAbstract:
The article contains methodological aspects of sustainable development of industrial ecosystems. The relevance of the study is confirmed by the fact that the promotion of inclusive and sustainable industry and further investment in physical infrastructure, innovation and research are essential for long-term economic development. It has been concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic has such destabilizing consequences that it threatens to halt or even reverse progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. However, a fairly rapid recovery of industry after coping with the coronavirus pandemic is possible, unlike the economy as a whole, which will require a much longer recovery period. The article proposes the architecture of the methodology for the sustainable development of industrial ecosystems, which includes five levels (paradigm, meta-level, ontology, meanings and directly ecosystem level). The paradigm in the study is the super task, the mental model of the transition to a new economy, to a new way of industrial production, to a new thinking. The meta-level of methodology is represented by the principles of sustainable development of industrial ecosystems, theoretical provisions (hypotheses, fundamental approaches, basic theories, laws of development). At the ontological level, the methodology for the sustainable development of industrial ecosystems uses digital twins, basic organizational and managerial mechanisms (procedures, tools, structures). The semantic level includes a conceptual apparatus (glossary), as well as applied theories and concepts of the sustainable development of industrial ecosystems. The ecosystem level of the methodology for sustainable development of industrial ecosystems combines the concepts of economic, ecological and natural-biological systems. The sustainable development of the industrial ecosystem is proposed to be managed at six levels (methodological, ideological, conceptual, modelling, application and technology). The conclusion concluded that an ecosystem-based economic model achieves the highest production efficiency compared to a traditional economy model and a platform-based digital model.
28
Kukushkin, S. N. "Transaction Analysis of Business-Ecosystems." Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, no. 5 (October 20, 2021): 138–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2021-5-138-147.
Full textAbstract:
Business-ecosystem is a rather new organizational form of interaction on market between customer and producer, which is used widely today by business-organizations of different organization and legal forms and types of economic activity. The article provides the analysis of business-ecosystems in view of the theory of transaction costs. The terms ‘ecosystem' was initially proposed to describe the environment of mutual existence of different biological beings. Later it was used for depicting the environment of business-organization. In this environment various antipodes exist and interact. At first sight they should avoid collaboration with each other, but in fact mutual coexistence intensifies every participant and fosters their development, therefore, they shall find forms and means of co-existence. In spite of the fact that business-ecosystem is a rather new trend in research in the field of economy and management, certain approaches to research and classification of the phenomenon have been created. The author in view of neo-institutional theory proves that business-ecosystem meets all classical canons, therefore it functions as a classical business-organization with similar goals and relevant tools.
29
Pipek, Volkmar, Volker Wulf, and Aditya Johri. "Bridging Artifacts and Actors: Expertise Sharing in Organizational Ecosystems." Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 21, no. 2-3 (July 27, 2011): 261–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-011-9138-y.
Full text
30
Palumbo, Rocco, Silvia Cosimato, and Aurelio Tommasetti. "Dream or reality? A recipe for sustainable and innovative health care ecosystems." TQM Journal 29, no. 6 (October 9, 2017): 847–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tqm-02-2017-0023.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose Service ecosystems are gaining credence among management scholars. However, there is still little agreement about the distinguishing attributes of service ecosystems in both the public and the private sectors. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the health care service system, suggesting a “recipe” for the implementation of a sustainable and innovative health care service ecosystem. Design/methodology/approach A mixed methodology was used. First, a critical literature review was conducted to lay the conceptual foundations of this study. Then a theory about the institutional, organizational and managerial requisites for the implementation of a health care service ecosystem was developed. Findings The health care sector is appropriate for the core tenets of the service ecosystem perspective. Tailored interventions aimed at improving the functioning of the health care service ecosystem should be implemented at the micro, meso, macro and mega levels. Patient empowerment, patient-centered care and integrated care are the fundamental ingredients of the recipe for effective health care service ecosystems. Practical implications The ecosystem approach provides health policy makers with interesting insights to help shape the health care service system of the future. The paper also contributes to the innovation of managerial practices emphasizing the role of patient involvement in the design and delivery of health care. Originality/value This is one of the first attempts to systematize scientific knowledge about service ecosystems in the health care sector. An agenda for further research is suggested, in order to further advance the establishment of an effective and innovative health care service ecosystem.
31
Kalenov, О. Е. "Business-Model Transformation: from Classical Organization to Ecosystem." Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, no. 3 (May 13, 2020): 124–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-3-124-131.
Full textAbstract:
Today’s business-environment is characterized by fast changes, serious diversity and tightening connection between its elements. These factors typical of this environment require new approaches to transformation of existing business-models. Perceiving conceptual description of entrepreneurial activity in the light of ecosystem, organizations can ensure their survival and at the same time raise the efficiency of their functioning. The article also studies processes of interaction and interdependence of organizations, their ecosystems and business-environment. The author identifies a number of characteristics, which are obligatory for ecosystem for successful functioning in the turbulent social and economic environment: heterogeneity, modality, redundancy, adaptation, pro-activity, confidentiality. Special attention during transformation processes of business-models towards ecosystems is paid to shaping a relative system of management, organizational structure and corporate culture. A specific role of the ecosystem leader is underlined, which determines its development and key rules of the ecosystem center (its driver) are shown and advantages of all its participants are described. The author characterizes the current stage of the ecosystem development and shows possible prospects of their shaping.
32
Bystrov, A. V., T. O. Tolstykh, and A. G. Radaykin. "Cross-Industry Ecosystem as an Organizational and Economic Model for the Development of High-Tech Industries." Economics and Management 26, no. 6 (August 25, 2020): 564–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-6-564-576.
Full textAbstract:
The presented study examines the fundamental prerequisites for the emergence of digital platforms, which would provide a global view of the role that platforms play in creating a new organizational model — an ecosystem of high-tech industries.Aim. In the context of industrial digitalization, the study aims to substantiate the creation of a modern mechanism for coordinating high-tech market participants within a single economic and organizational space — an ecosystem based on a cross-industry digital platform.Tasks. The authors analyze the international experience of implementing digital platforms, identify problems and provide recommendations for solving them in the context of digital platform implementation in the Russian industry.Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition in various aspects to analyze the current vector of industrial development driven by the introduction of ecosystems as a new organizational and economic model; describe the principles of their formation, possible structure, and main differences from traditional cluster and network models; substantiate that an ecosystem model allows its participants to achieve a positive synergistic effect in the implementation of their strategic development goals in the context of digital transformation.Results. The issues of using the tools of an industrial digital platform to facilitate the interaction between participants within an ecosystem are considered. Platform solutions in the industry show great promise in terms of analyzing large amounts of data, reducing transaction costs, and obtaining “perfect information”. The direction for the implementation of cross-industry digital platforms and creation of ecosystems in the near future is characterized.Conclusions. Digital cross-industry interaction within the framework of a common platform will expand external communications and promotion channels, making it possible to introduce digital business models and diversify production, but also requiring compatibility between the systems of industrial enterprises and a functioning digital platform and cloud environment.
33
Zhong, Junying, and Marko Nieminen. "Resource-based co-innovation through platform ecosystem: experiences of mobile payment innovation in China." Journal of Strategy and Management 8, no. 3 (August 17, 2015): 283–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jsma-03-2015-0026.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce the RISE model on service innovation in coopetitive business environment. The case study illustrates why and how Chinese providers utilize ecosystems for innovative mobile payment service development to achieve coopetitive advantage based on firms’ superior resources. Design/methodology/approach – The companies in the case study include Alipay (third-party actor), Bestpay (mobile operator), and UnionPay (banking). Empirical data comes from semi-structured interviews complemented with observations and documents. The analysis of the data follows grounded theory guidelines: creation of a theoretical framework, data collection, and interpretation of the data using the coding strategies of open coding, axial coding, and selected coding. Findings – Inter-organizational co-innovation appears as a successful strategy for mobile payment service innovation. In addition to strategic choice on this, understanding of superior and inferior resources and capabilities influence firms’ coopetitive advantages in a coopetitive service development environment. Ecosystems are formed along with the innovating activities, and difficulties are caused by coopetition challenges. The RISE model enables the analysis and selection of strategic patterns for service innovation in a coopetitive environment. Originality/value – The paper contributes to resource-advantage theory and platform ecosystem theory. The theories are used to analyze and model the effects of strategy execution for achieving win-win relationships in inter-organizational co-innovation. This paper helps executives to match their service innovation strategies to platform ecosystem architectures, as well as to understand how resource-advantage challenges affect the execution strategy of setting up their platform ecosystems.
34
Burrell, Darrell Norman. "Understanding the Talent Management Intricacies of Remote Cybersecurity Teams in Covid-19 Induced Telework Organizational Ecosystems." Land Forces Academy Review 25, no. 3 (September 1, 2020): 232–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raft-2020-0028.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe unanticipated disruption triggered by Coronavirus, also known as COVID-19, has accelerated the shift to virtual workplace ecosystems for employees in the government, business, and the military. The accelerated move to whole organization telework has also created new complex challenges around managing cybersecurity risks. Complex business and governmental organizational ecosystems have several significant and critical job tasks around cybersecurity. These roles have the involved responsibility of functioning as effective teams to handle incident responses, intrusion evaluations, crisis management, crisis communications, forensic data examinations, malware analyzations, firewall assessments, penetration testing, disaster recovery, emergency response planning, risk management, human factor analyzation, training assessment, and active network monitoring. This qualitative research study explores the nuances of employee engagement, organizational development, and the management of virtual and remote cybersecurity teams in ways that enhance complex business and organizational ecosystems in the world of professional practice.
35
Семененко, I. M., Р. А. Галгаш, Я. О. Литовка, and Г. О. Борова. "Sustainable development of the region's ecosystem: essence and support problems." ВІСНИК СХІДНОУКРАЇНСЬКОГО НАЦІОНАЛЬНОГО УНІВЕРСИТЕТУ імені Володимира Даля, no. 3 (267) (April 10, 2021): 7–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.33216/1998-7927-2021-267-3-7-12.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the essence of the ecosystem of the region and the problems of its sustainable development support. In particular, different interpretations of the ecosystem are identified. The ecosystem approach is presented as the basis of the concept of sustainable development.
It is proposed to define the ecosystem of the region as a set of interdependent actors and factors coordinated to improve the social, ecological and economic condition of the region. The region's ecosystem has its own structure, which is defined in the paper. Each ecosystem is characterized by a specific set of characteristics, which determine the potential for ecosystem development, including resources, barriers and needs that distinguish ecosystems in different regions. The stakeholders within the ecosystem structure include public authorities and local governments, the private sector, the public sector, as well as educational institutions and research institutions. Each stakeholder has own functions, which contribute to sustainable development of the ecosystem. The components of the region's ecosystems meet the three dimensions of the sustainable development goals, the simultaneous implementation of which is of great importance.
There are a lot of factors, which influence the region's ecosystem development. The classification of these factors is presented in the article. The factors include internal and external, resource and regulatory, positive and negative impact etc. The possible manifestation of positive and negative impact of the factors on sustainable development of the region's ecosystem is examined. The factors specific to Luhansk oblast, which are connected with the negative impact of the armed conflict, are outlined.
The necessity to create the institutional support of sustainable development of region's ecosystem is defined. Such institutional support includes regulatory, organizational, managerial, financial, economic and information components. These components are realized within the legislative framework, organizational framework, civil society framework.
36
Kleiner, Georgy, Maksim Rybachuk, and Venera Karpinskaya. "Development of ecosystems in the financial sector of Russia." Upravlenets 11, no. 4 (September 4, 2020): 2–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-1.
Full textAbstract:
The paper examines the problems and factors in the development of ecosystems in the financial sector and related sectors of economy. It demonstrates the prospects for expanding the population of ecosystems in both the global financial market and the Russian banking system. Special focus is on two main prerequisites for the ecosystem development: digitalization of the entire economy and the emergence of innovative information-communication technologies in the financial sector (fintech). The study aims to juxtapose theoretical concepts and definitions of ecosystem with the real practice in Russia and the prospects for the development of ecosystems in the financial sector in order to produce recommendations on activating and regulating the transition from a traditional to an ecosystem economic model. Methodologically, the research rests on system economic theory, which implies that economy is a field for creating, interacting and developing socio-economic systems of various kinds – object-, process-, project- and environment-based systems. Within the framework of this approach, an ecosystem includes: an organizational component represented by a cluster as an object-based subsystem; infrastructure – an information-technological platform as an environment-based subsystem; communication and logistics component – a network as a process-based subsystem; innovative component – a business incubator as a project-based subsystem. Ecosystems in the financial sector are analyzed for compliance with this requirements. We scrutinize the case of FinTech Association as the most technologically advanced community of banking institutions. The research methods are content analysis, ranking score and logical grouping of research objects. The findings show that it is expedient to create a regulating institution that combines the functions similar to those of the FAS of the RF and the Central Bank of the RF in relation to the ecosystems’ activities.
37
Kapoor, Rahul. "Collaboration in Innovation Ecosystems: Firm Strategy and Inter-organizational Ties." Academy of Management Proceedings 2016, no. 1 (January 2016): 16326. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.16326symposium.
Full text
38
Bystrov, A. V., A. G. Radaikin, and E. V. Fedoseev. "Formation of Organizational and Economic Model of Cross-Industry Ecosystems." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 666, no. 6 (March 1, 2021): 062112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/666/6/062112.
Full text
39
Purusottama, Ambara, and Yohanes Berenika Kadarusman. "The essential benefits of an enterprise blockchain in business model innovation." Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis 24, no. 2 (June 30, 2021): 189–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v24i2.3746.
Full textAbstract:
Blockchain brings changes and disruptions to the existing business models and therefore deserves further analysis. Accordingly, this study aims to explain the phenomenon of blockchain technology in the business model innovation in the enterprise ecosystem. Empirically, numerous studies have shown that blockchain technology improves organizational performance. This study uses a value system framework to explain the enterprise blockchain phenomenon. Through abductive reasoning, this study uses a multiple-case study to answer the research questions. In sum, this study finds that blockchain technology delivers benefits to organizations in: (i) value capture through increased profitability; (ii) value creation through private partnership; (iii) value delivery through smart contracts; and (iv) value proposition that encourages improving the existing value proposition through operational improvements. Besides, the study also proposes the different types of enterprise blockchain ecosystems: private and consortium. The private ecosystem focuses on improving organizational performance through competition. In contrast, the consortium ecosystem focuses on business value collaboration.
40
Kobernyk, A. O. "Regional Innovation Ecosystems in Ukraine." Business Inform 7, no. 522 (2021): 56–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-7-56-61.
Full textAbstract:
The article substantiates the prerequisites, prospects and advantages of creating an innovation ecosystem at different levels of its formation. The main approaches to defining the essence of the concept of innovation ecosystems in both domestic and foreign specialized literature and their adaptability to the regional level are analyzed and grouped. The harmonious innovation ecosystem is a sign of a progressive society, which is identified by the symbiotic functioning of people and organizations, the result of which is the production of conscious innovations. The author outlines the stages of formation of the regional innovation ecosystem, the circle of its participants and ways of their interaction. For each stage, the procedures for its implementation, the main characteristic features and processes of transition from one to another are determined. The main feature of the creation and functioning of the regional ecosystem is the stable, constant interaction of its participants with educational and scientific institutions, as well as the adaptability of these institutions to the variability of the external environment. The article describes certain elements of foreign experience in the development of regional ecosystems and their implementation in Ukraine. Awareness of the existence or prerequisites for creating an effective regional ecosystem is the first step towards effective regional management and activation of the potential of the national economy. On the one hand, in the context of decentralization, local self-government bodies get maximum freedom in creating organizational elements of the regional innovation ecosystem, supporting scientific and human resources and the communication business environment. The author emphasizes that without the State support it is impossible to create conditions for the protectionism of innovation activity, to activate investment potential, to stimulate the necessary forms and methods of financing the relevant activity. Therefore, work at the regional level in terms of innovation should be carried out simultaneously following two directions of the hierarchy: from bottom up and from top to bottom in constant cooperation and coordination of own actions. As a result, priority directions of the State and regional support for the development of regional innovation ecosystems on the basis of the main specific platforms or technologies are substantiated.
41
Simchenko, Nataliia, Svetlana Tsohla, and Viktor Fursov. "Ecosystem methodology for the development of the scientific potential of the network interaction of economic agents in the digital environment." E3S Web of Conferences 311 (2021): 06003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131106003.
Full textAbstract:
The paper considers the study of the problem of the development of the scientific potential of the network interaction of economic agents in the digital environment based on the ecosystem methodology. The study of this problem was based on the use of analytical methods for reviewing the scientific interdisciplinary literature of international databases, methods for analyzing the digital transformation of management relations “ecosystem is a management system of an organization”, as well as methods for integrating heterogeneous economic data on the development of economic relations in the development of platform ecosystems. The most important result of the research is the conceptual substantiation of the formation of the scientific potential of the network interaction of economic agents based on the ecosystem development of forms of technological entrepreneurship and lifelong learning. The ecosystem methodology proposed by the authors is based on the identification of three types of relations “ecosystem is a management system”: intersystematic relations; relations of intra-organizational regulation; platform management relationship. The significance of the results obtained is due to the importance of developing the economy of ecosystems on the basis of interdisciplinary network integrativity of the interaction of economic agents in the digital environment.
42
Jonas, Julia M., Julian Boha, David Sörhammar, and Kathrin M. Moeslein. "Stakeholder engagement in intra- and inter-organizational innovation." Journal of Service Management 29, no. 3 (May 4, 2018): 399–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/josm-09-2016-0239.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose To further extend the understanding of multidimensional engagement of stakeholders embedded in service systems, the purpose of this paper is to explore the antecedents that constitute stakeholder engagement in inter-organizational service ecosystems where stakeholders co-create innovations over time. Design/methodology/approach An explorative, longitudinal case study design is employed to analyze stakeholders’ engagement in co-innovation in an inter-organizational service system in an engineering context. Findings The study identifies eight antecedents for stakeholder engagement in innovation in the context of a B2B environment. Building on related engagement research, the empirical data show how stakeholder engagement is influenced at both individual and organizational levels by the antecedents friendship, common experiences, self-representation, trust, a common goal, resource dependency, level in the hierarchy, institutional arrangements, and local proximity. Originality/value The paper extends current understanding of engagement and illuminates stakeholder engagement on a micro level, addressing four key issues for stakeholder engagement in a service ecosystem. How can stakeholder engagement be maintained over time? Does stakeholder engagement at specific hierarchical levels enhance or hinder inter-organizational co-innovation? Is strong engagement necessary for innovation activities? Are the different engagement antecedents linked?
43
Vernihorova, Nataliia. "INSTITUTIONAL PREREQUISITES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL AND ECONOMIC QUALITY ASSURANCE OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF CITY PARKS." Three Seas Economic Journal 2, no. 3 (September 30, 2021): 8–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2021-3-2.
Full textAbstract:
As of today, according to the classifications of ecosystem services, there were developed numerous methods of their assessment. At the same time, there are no studies on institutional support for ecosystems depending on their functional groups. If we want to achieve economic effects in our economic activity in the process of support and improvement of ecosystem functions, we need to know exactly what effects are desirable and which ecosystem functions are responsible for them. Therefore, the subject of research of the article is groups of ecosystem services of city parks and the possibility of their institutional support. The purpose of the article is to present a comprehensive approach to support for ecosystem services of city parks by diversifying directions of support by ecosystem functions. The article uses methods of theoretical cognition, namely: induction, deduction and systems analysis. The use of systems analysis is aimed at systematizing data on ecosystem functioning, and known ways of their institutional control and support. Conceptual data passes through the border of economics and ecology, and consist of known developments for the assessment of ecosystem services, their functional classification. The study and analysis of these sources allowed to develop a comprehensive approach to institutional support of park ecosystems, in order to obtain certain economic, ecological and social effects. The paper presents the specifics of institutional support of parks according to the landscape and geographical approach. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of parks of different categories, it was found that city parks in their organizational and economic support should embody the functions of public space, while maintaining its ecological significance for the city. Therefore, the results of the research indicate that due to its versatility, high-quality organization of the city park requires clear and responsible institutional support. A quality city park meets the social and ecological needs of the city, and ideally, contributes to the economic well-being of nearby facilities and areas. The popularity and economic importance of the park depends on the ability to meet all these needs and the quality of ecosystem services of the park. The practical significance of the study is that the diversification of institutional support of city parks by groups of ecosystem services will increase the efficiency of management and organizational apparatus in the field of park management and will improve the quality of services received by park visitors. Improvement of the quality of services will contribute towards the increase of the popularity of parks and, consequently, economic benefits. The originality of the article lies in the fact that the author proposed for the first time the support for park facilities by groups of ecosystem services. It is determined that city parks are characterized by the following functional groups of ecosystem services: regulatory, cultural and supportive. The qualitative component with regard to the city park provides not only its support as an ecosystem, but also the possibility of convenient consumption of these services by park visitors. Therefore, it is important for city parks to note the availability of infrastructure, which should be considered separately from the support of ecosystem services.
44
Ford, Robert C., and Keenan D. Yoho. "The government’s role in creating an innovation ecosystem: the Springfield Armory as hub in the Connecticut River Valley." Journal of Management History 26, no. 4 (June 30, 2020): 557–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jmh-02-2020-0016.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to illustrate, through the example of the Springfield Armory and its role in the development of interchangeable parts, the critical role of government in establishing a cluster of organizations that evolved into an innovation ecosystem primarily located in the Connecticut River Valley in the 1800s. Using the Springfield Armory example, we use the related but largely unjoined concepts of ecosystem and networks to show that these organizational forms are effective in driving innovation. Design/methodology/approach The design uses an in-depth analysis of the role of the Springfield Armory to explicate the joining of network and ecosystem theory as an early example of the importance of governmental funding and support for innovation. Findings The development of interchangeable parts in the American arms industry in the 19th century transformed manufacturing worldwide. At the heart of this transformation was the network of arms makers that developed in the Connecticut River Valley as a direct result of US Government investment and support. This network of arms makers evolved into an ecosystem of mutually reinforcing relationships as machine tool manufacturers benefited from an environment of free-flowing intellectual property, information and growing governmental demand for arms. The Armory illustrates the government’s role in initiating and sustaining clusters of innovation that otherwise might not have developed as quickly. Originality/value Much of the research on the role of government in creating innovation ecosystems and organizational networks is based on modern organizations. This use of the Springfield Armory in the early 1800s broadens the knowledge on how innovation ecosystems in conjunction with networked organizations can be created by governments serving the public good.
45
Okunkova, E. A., S. L. Ozerov, A. V. Kolesnikov, and E. V. Zakharov. "SOCIO-ECONOMIC FUNCTIONS OF ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR ROLE IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT." EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE: PROBLEMY, RESHENIYA 3, no. 10 (2021): 120–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.10.03.013.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the study of the socio-economic functions of ecosystems and their role in economic development. The aim of the study is to develop recommendations for improving the strategic management of the banking group based on the ecosystem approach, as well as to assess the effectiveness of their use. The object of the study is VTB Group, the object is organizational and economic relations in the process of formation, development and functioning of VTB Group. It was concluded that from the point of view of the Central Bank it is logical to allocate the budget with one body responsible for collective investment.
46
Tsurkan, Мarina, Irina Dokukina, and Alexey Artemiev. "Participants’ interaction in infrastructure projects of the municipal-private partnership." E3S Web of Conferences 210 (2020): 13018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021013018.
Full textAbstract:
The article systematizes the idea of the participants’ interaction in thr infrastructure projects of municipal-private partnerships through an ecosystem approach. Required and non-mandatory project participants, as well as an algorithm for their interaction in the framework of the municipal-private partnerships’ ecosystem, which is classified as “Ecosystems of infrastructure partnership” in the article, are identified. A methodological apparatus has been developed and organizational models for the construction or reconstruction of the municipal-private partnerships infrastructure projects are formed. The models are proposed to be divided into basic and varied, the latter are essentially summary and may include from one to three optional elements.
47
Uden, Lorna, and Pasquale Del Vecchio. "Transforming the stakeholders’ Big Data for intellectual capital management." Meditari Accountancy Research 26, no. 3 (August 13, 2018): 420–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/medar-08-2017-0191.
Full textAbstract:
PurposeThis paper aims to define a conceptual framework for transforming Big Data into organizational value by focussing on the perspectives of service science and activity theory. In coherence with the agenda on evolutionary research on intellectual capital (IC), the study also provides momentum for researchers and scholars to explore emerging trends and implications of Big Data for IC management.Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts a qualitative and integrated research method based on a constructive review of existing literature related to IC management, Big Data, service science and activity theory to identify features and processes of a conceptual framework emerging at the intersection of previously identified research topics.FindingsThe proposed framework harnesses the power of Big Data, collectively created by the engagement of multiple stakeholders based on the concepts of service ecosystems, by using activity theory. The transformation of Big Data for IC management addresses the process of value creation based on a set of critical dimensions useful to identify goals, main actors and stakeholders, processes and motivations.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper indicates how organizational values can be created from Big Data through the co-creation of value in service ecosystems. Activity theory is used as theoretical lens to support IC ecosystem development. This research is exploratory; the framework offers opportunities for refinement and can be used to spearhead directions for future research.Practical implicationsThe paper proposes a framework for transforming Big Data into organizational values for IC management in the context of entrepreneurial universities as pivotal contexts of observation that can be replicated in different fields. The framework provides guidelines that can be used to help organizations intending to embark on the emerging paradigm of Big Data for IC management for their competitive advantages.Originality/valueThe paper’s originality is in bringing together research from Big Data, value co-creation from service ecosystems and activity theory to address the complex issues involved in IC management. A further element of originality offered involves integrating such multidisciplinary perspectives as a lens for shaping the complex process of value creation from Big Data in relationship to IC management. The concept of how IC ecosystems can be designed is also introduced.
48
Claudel, Matthew. "From Organizations to Organizational Fields: The Evolution of Civic Innovation Ecosystems." Technology Innovation Management Review 8, no. 6 (June 28, 2018): 34–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1163.
Full text
49
KAPOOR, RAHUL. "COORDINATING AND COMPETING IN ECOSYSTEMS: HOW ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS SHAPE NEW TECHNOLOGY." Academy of Management Proceedings 2010, no. 1 (August 2010): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2010.54501127.
Full text
50
Stoiko, Nataliia. "GREEN ECONOMY – THE PARADIGM OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS IN UKRAINE." International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences 3, no. 1 (June 30, 2016): 90–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.4709.
Full textAbstract:
Some possibilities to apply green economy in order to achieve sustainable development of agro-ecosystems in Ukraine are described in the article. On the basis of the comparison of such definitions as “sustainable development” and “green economy” it was concluded that green economy is organizational and economic fundamentals for sustainable development. The analysis of agro-ecosystems of Ukraine is performed and the extensive method of farming leading to the deterioration of the ecological conditions of agro-ecosystems is determined. Management mechanism of sustainable development of agro-ecosystems in Ukraine based on the concept of “green economy” is suggested.