Academic literature on the topic 'Organizational behavior; Organizational change'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Organizational behavior; Organizational change.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Organizational behavior; Organizational change"
Simo, Pep, Jose M. Sallan, Vicenc Fernandez, and Mihaela Enache. "Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior." International Journal of Organizational Analysis 24, no. 2 (May 9, 2016): 261–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2014-0805.
Full textTsoukas, Haridimos, and Robert Chia. "On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change." Organization Science 13, no. 5 (October 2002): 567–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810.
Full textTasselli, Stefano, Martin Kilduff, and Blaine Landis. "Personality Change: Implications for Organizational Behavior." Academy of Management Annals 12, no. 2 (June 2018): 467–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0008.
Full textAlbers Mohrman, Susan, and Edward E. Lawler. "Participative Managerial Behavior and Organizational Change." Journal of Organizational Change Management 1, no. 1 (January 1988): 45–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025593.
Full textKelley, Patricia C. "Can Feminist Language Change Organizational Behavior?" Business & Society 35, no. 1 (March 1996): 84–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765039603500107.
Full textJanicijevic, Nebojsa. "Organizational learning in the theory of organizational change." Ekonomski anali 51, no. 171 (2006): 7–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/eka0671007j.
Full textFurxhi, Gentisa, Sonela Stillo, and Marinela Teneqexhi. "Organizational Change: Employees Reaction Towards It." European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 1, no. 1 (April 30, 2016): 303. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v1i1.p303-308.
Full textHannan, Michael T., László Pólos, and Glenn R. Carroll. "Cascading Organizational Change." Organization Science 14, no. 5 (October 2003): 463–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.463.16763.
Full textAl-Hussami, Mahmoud, Sawsan Hammad, and Firas Alsoleihat. "The influence of leadership behavior, organizational commitment, organizational support, subjective career success on organizational readiness for change in healthcare organizations." Leadership in Health Services 31, no. 4 (October 1, 2018): 354–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/lhs-06-2017-0031.
Full textNielsen, W. R., N. Nykodym, and D. J. Brown. "Ethics and Organizational Change." Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 29, no. 1 (September 1, 1991): 82–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/103841119102900109.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Organizational behavior; Organizational change"
Unger, Cai. "Key Concepts of Organizational Change - A Bibliometric Network Analysis." Thesis, University of South Alabama, 2017. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10643261.
Full textThe field of Organizational Change has seen a proliferation of publications of all sorts over the past two decades. In view of the emerging breadth of the field, it is becoming increasingly difficult for practitioners and researchers alike to separate the wheat from the chaff. At the same time, research suggests the majority of Organizational Change efforts are not successful. It is therefore my intent to map the nomological structure of the field of Organizational Change, determine the most dominating concepts, and identify any patterns or trends.
For that purpose I have collected bibliometric data from 1948 to 2016 and conduct a network analysis based on co-occurrence of keywords of Organizational Change.
My network analysis suggests five major findings. First, the field of Organizational Change has reached a level of maturity, which reduces the likelihood of breakthrough innovations. Second, only five concepts are dominating the field of Organizational Change today, which I label the “Top Five”: Change management, leadership, organizational culture, organizational learning, and innovation. Third, we are barking up the wrong tree, which means there is an inherent inconsistency between the topicality of the field, i.e. the dominance of very few topics, and the low success rate of Organizational Change projects. Fourth, it is still unclear how to exactly define and reliably measure change. Finally fifth, there seems to be too much focus on the paradigm that change is always preferably over an equilibrium.
I therefore propose three suggestions for further research. First, look beyond the Top Five concepts and create more dissonant discussion within the field, including a critical review of established paradigms. Second, revisit the established definitions and measurements of change, which includes questioning the widespread assumption that the majority of change efforts are failing. Finally third, conduct a network analysis based on a network of social actors of the field of organizational change, i.e. authors of organizational change.
Wiard, Theodore John. "Leadership Behaviors in the Midst of an Organizational Change Initiative| A Case Study." Thesis, Grand Canyon University, 2018. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10826393.
Full textThe purpose of this qualitative, single case study was to understand leadership behaviors that motivate internal stakeholders to trust a leader’s vision, embrace change, facilitate employee willingness to passionately implement actions needed for an organizational change initiative and willingly sustain a change initiative. A sample of 20 internal stakeholders was studied, five leaders and 15 followers within an organization of 800+ employees, located in the southwestern region of the United States, which is currently undergoing a change initiative. The research questions were based upon Kurt Lewin’s three-step model of change: unfreezing, transitioning, and refreezing. This research asked how leadership behaviors facilitated employee willingness to trust a leader’s vision and embrace change, passionately implement actions needed for a change, and sustain a change initiative, making an implemented initiative the new normal for the organization. Three themes emerged to address the research questions: 1) know your audience and walk your talk; 2) communication, vision, trust, and buy-in; and 3) residual passion and perseverance. Findings suggested that leadership behaviors influence internal stakeholders in relation to a change initiative and that leaders who are hands-on, consistent, and demonstrate a clear vision increased the possibility of gleaning passion and trust to increase the potential for success during an organizational change initiative.
Delich, Joshua T. "Organizational Behavior: Perceptions Analysis of Micro and Macro Organizational Behavior in an Organizational Setting." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2015. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc822756/.
Full textNajrani, Majed. "The effect of change capability, learning capability and shared leadership on organizational agility." Thesis, Pepperdine University, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10141724.
Full textOrganizational agility represents a new field of organizational study that is not well examined. In the past organizations had an unmatched competitive advantage due to low competition and higher barriers to entry into their markets. As a result, many organizations dominated their industries. However, in the era of globalization, individuals with an internet connection and the right skills can start new organizations that can compete on a global level. Consequently, organizations now are facing more competition that they experienced in the past. Another reason for increase competition is new technology. Technology is improving increasingly faster than any time in history. Therefore, organizations that are not agile could not survive in the current environment.
Agile entities realize that they have to become flexible and nimble to withstand competition. Accordingly, the researcher in this study proposes an organizational agility model and this proposed model is the focus of the study. The proposed model significant arises from the fact that currently there are limited numbers of models that help organizations in becoming agile entities. The characteristics in this study were based on Worley and Lawler (2010) “Agility and Organization Design: A Diagnostic Framework”. The study conducted a survey utilizing an instrument developed by Dr. Worley and Dr. Lawler that contains 15 agility characteristics. The survey uses all 15 characteristics to determine if the organization is agile. In addition, the study utilizes three of the 15 agility characteristics to determent if a relationship occurs between the study variables.
This quantitative study examined the relationship between change capability, learning capability, shared leadership and organizational agility. Moreover, understanding these relationships could assist scholars and practitioners in producing change programs that emphasize certain behaviors that make an organization agile. The study surveyed 116 participants and found that focusing on change capability, learning capability and shared leadership could contribute in creating agile organizations. Consequently, after evaluating the study results, a new agility model emerged. This model shows that organizations can achieve agility by developing change capability, learning capability, shared leadership, shared purpose and flexible resources. Ultimately, achieving agility could help organizations compete and endure now and the future.
Schmitz, Heidi Anne. "Degree of organizational change and job insecurity." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 1997. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1402.
Full textChavez, Elisa. "The change equation| A correlation study of status quo bias in managers." Thesis, University of Phoenix, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10017972.
Full textThe purpose of the research study was to predict managerial resistance to status quo bias given the presence of dissatisfaction, vision, and a process outlined for change in the environment. According to the 79 participants surveyed in the study, dissatisfaction, vision, and a process outlined for change provided a statistically significant model for predicting manager resistance to status quo bias for the sample studied. Leaders may be able to use the results of the study to determine manager readiness for change. However, at best the study found only 45.3% of the reasons that predict managerial resistance to status quo bias, providing an opportunity for future researchers to validate empirically other factors that may predict manager resistance to status quo bias.
Barnett, Michelle L. "Organizational development: A comparison of individual and organizational level change." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2005. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4819/.
Full textPhillips, Tobe M. "Individual Behavior Change in the Context of Organization Change: Towards Validation of the Transtheoretical Model of Change in an Organizational Environment." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2004. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4686/.
Full textDrummond, Geoffrey, and n/a. "Understanding organisation culture, leadership, conflict, and change." Swinburne University of Technology, 1996. http://adt.lib.swin.edu.au./public/adt-VSWT20060821.092317.
Full textAlDossari, Sultan. "Overcoming resistance to change in Saudi Arabian organizations| A correlation study between resistance to change and organizational justice." Thesis, Pepperdine University, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10251268.
Full textAfter 12 years of negotiation, Saudi Arabia joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2005. The impact of joining the WTO has caused many Saudi organizations to change some of their old ways to keep up with competition from all around the world. Foreign investments created a healthy competition that encouraged Saudi Arabian organizations to change, adapt, and thrive in the market. With the need for change, Saudi Arabian organizations are facing employees’ resistance for unknown reasons. The purpose of this study was to analyze the reasons behind resistance to change in Saudi Arabian organizations and suggest approaches to minimize resistance and facilitate successful organizational change. Many researchers have found a relationship between organizational justice and employees’ behavior, especially during organizational change. Additionally, Saudi Arabian culture influences employees’ behavior towards change. Therefore, this correlational study examine the relationship between resistance to change and organizational justice, as well as the relationship between resistance to change and demographic measures in one Saudi Arabian organization. The scales that were used in this study are pre-existing and have been tested for validity and reliability. To measure resistance to change, the researcher used Oreg’s (2003) Resistance to Change Scale, which divides resistance to change into four factors (routine seeking, emotional reaction, short-term focus, and cognitive rigidity), and Colquitt’s (2001) Organizational Justice Scale, which divides organizational into four dimensions (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational). A total of 55 completed surveys were collected with 76.4% male respondents, and 85.5% under the age of 40 years old, which showed how young and male dominant the workforce is in Saudi Arabia. The study concluded that the organizational justice dimensions of procedural and interpersonal justice have a negative significant relationship with employees’ resistance, especially the short-term focus factor. Moreover, from the demographic measures, the age factor also had a significant negative relationship with resistance to change, mostly with the short-term focus factor.
Books on the topic "Organizational behavior; Organizational change"
Behavior and organizational change. Reno, Nev: Center for Basque Studies, 2011.
Find full textHek, Jaap van 't, 1953-, ed. Why organizational change fails: Robustness, tenacity and change in organizations. New York: Routledge, 2011.
Find full textArgyris, Chris. Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.
Find full textOvercoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1990.
Find full textArgyris, Chris. Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning. Boston: Allynand Bacon, 1990.
Find full textReznik, Semen. Organizational behavior. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1089957.
Full textMichelson, Grant, Cliff Oswick, David Grant, and Nick Wailes. Discourse and organizational change. Bradford, England: Emerald Group Publishing, 2005.
Find full textThe irrational organization: Irrationality as a basis for organizational action and change. 2nd ed. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget, 2000.
Find full textThe irrational organization: Irrationality as a basis for organizational action and change. Chichester [West Sussex]: Wiley, 1985.
Find full textHead, Thomas C. Organization behavior and change: Managing human resources for organizational effectiveness. Champaign, Ill: Stipes Pub., 1996.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Organizational behavior; Organizational change"
Champoux, Joseph E. "Organizational Change and Development." In Organizational Behavior, 461–82. Sixth edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003000587-27.
Full textWagner, John A., and John R. Hollenbeck. "Culture, Change, and Organization Development." In Organizational Behavior, 369–97. Third Edition. | New York : Routledge, 2021. | Revised edition of the authors’ Organizational behavior, 2015.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003009580-18.
Full textBarnhill, Christopher R., Natalie L. Smith, and Brent D. Oja. "Organizational Change." In Organizational Behavior in Sport Management, 81–90. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67612-4_8.
Full textKaplan, Leslie S., and William A. Owings. "Leading Organizational Change/Organizational Learning." In Organizational Behavior for School Leadership, 139–71. New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315669502-5.
Full textRoss, Stanley C. "Change Management in Organizations." In Organizational Behavior Today, 163–84. 1 Edition. | New York: Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003142119-12.
Full textMalott, Maria E. "Paradox of Organizational Change." In Applied Behavior Science in Organizations, 129–60. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003198949-6.
Full textKaplan, Howard B. "Executive Director Role Behavior and the Implementation of Program Change." In Organizational Innovation, 35–89. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0151-0_4.
Full textFineman, Stephen. "Change in Organizations." In Analyzing Organizational Behaviour, 228–50. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21542-3_11.
Full textKaplan, Howard B. "Role Behavior of the Board of Directors and the Implementation of Program Change." In Organizational Innovation, 113–18. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0151-0_7.
Full textKaplan, Howard B. "Board Member Perceptions of Executive Director Role Behavior and the Implementation of Program Change." In Organizational Innovation, 101–12. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0151-0_6.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Organizational behavior; Organizational change"
Al Majzoub, Khaled, and Vida Davidavičienė. "ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOR CHANGES CAUSED BY INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES." In Business and Management 2018. VGTU Technika, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bm.2018.15.
Full textConger, Dorian S. "Can Safety Culture Be This Important?" In 2014 22nd International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone22-31241.
Full textYounas, Amjad, Daoping Wang, Basharat Javed, and Aboubacar Garba Konte. "Inclusive Leadership and Change-oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior." In ICMSS 2020: 2020 4th International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3380625.3380652.
Full textHe, Jian-jia, Chun-ming Ye, and Fu-yuan Xu. "A Study on Organizational Change and Human Behavior in the Process of Organization Information Reform." In 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icmss.2010.5578116.
Full textGeorge Saadé, Raafat, and James Wan. "Proposing an Integrated Change Management Model for the United Nations." In InSITE 2017: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences: Vietnam. Informing Science Institute, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/3776.
Full textJednak, Sandra. "Adapting Business to Sustainable Development and New Technology." In Values, Competencies and Changes in Organizations. University of Maribor Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-442-2.81.
Full textAhuja, Inderpreet Singh, J. S. Khamba, and Rajesh Choudhary. "Improved Organizational Behavior Through Strategic Total Productive Maintenance Implementation." In ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2006-15783.
Full textKazmi, Syeda Asiya Zenab, and Marja Naarananoja. "Comparative approaches of key change management models – a fine assortment to pick from as per situational needs!" In 3rd Annual International Conference on Business Strategy and Organizational Behaviour (BizStrategy 2013). Global Science and Technology Forum Pte Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-1970_bizstrategy13.41.
Full textWozir, Abdulahi Efrah, and Fan Luo. "Transformation Leadership, Employees’ Motivation and Behavioral Support for Organizational Change." In The Second International Symposium on Management and Social Sciences (ISMSS 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201202.110.
Full textGuerola-Navarro, Vicente, Raul Oltra-Badenes, Hermenegildo Gil-Gomez, and Maria Herrero-Casanova. "EXPERIENCE OF EXTERNAL COLLABORATION IN “ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT” SUBJECT IN PRACTICAL LESSON." In 12th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2019.0113.
Full textReports on the topic "Organizational behavior; Organizational change"
Caliendo, Lorenzo, Ferdinando Monte, and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Exporting and Organizational Change. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23630.
Full textBlunck, Paula. Perceived Communication During Organizational Change. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.6602.
Full textBauer, Travis L., and Tom Rego Brounstein. Inferring Organizational Structure from Behavior. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1494636.
Full textEdwards, Dominick L. Spouse Influence in Army Organizational Change. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada505495.
Full textCarlson, Scott M. Defeat: A Motivation for Organizational Change? Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada468391.
Full textCupo, Douglas E. Strategic Organizational Change. Innovative Organizational and Job Designs to Improve Future Productivity and Operational Effectiveness. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada309093.
Full textTeister, Keith J. Organizational Change for the United States Armed Forces. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada435834.
Full textMurrell, Emily. Organizational Culture Change Resulting From Human Resources Outsourcing. Portland State University Library, January 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/honors.144.
Full textGould, Michael G. Strategic Leadership and Organizational Change: Challenges in Army Transformation. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada404498.
Full textJohnson, Craig L. Transformation of Installation Management: An Analysis of Organizational Change. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada448585.
Full text