Academic literature on the topic 'Oral assessment'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Oral assessment.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Oral assessment"
HOLMES, SUSAN, and ELIZABETH MOUNTAIN. "Assessment of oral status: evaluation of three oral assessment guides." Journal of Clinical Nursing 2, no. 1 (January 1993): 35–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.1993.tb00128.x.
Full textRoberts, Josephine. "Oral assessment and intervention." Nursing Older People 13, no. 7 (October 2001): 14–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nop2001.10.13.7.14.c2186.
Full textChambers, Francine, and Brian Richards. "Criteria for oral assessment." Language Learning Journal 6, no. 1 (September 1992): 5–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571739285200331.
Full textJoughin, Gordon. "Dimensions of Oral Assessment." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23, no. 4 (December 1998): 367–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230404.
Full textChapple, Liz, and Zehra Yonel. "Oral health risk assessment." Dental Update 45, no. 9 (October 2, 2018): 841–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/denu.2018.45.9.841.
Full textWisker, Gina. "Innovative Assessment: Peer Group and Oral Assessment." Educational and Training Technology International 31, no. 2 (May 1994): 104–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0954730940310204.
Full textYu, Chongqing, and Zheng Zhou. "Assessment of oral dysfunction after oral cancer treatment." Oral Oncology 133 (October 2022): 106046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106046.
Full textBhati, Shyam S. "The effectiveness of oral presentation assessment in a Finance subject: An empirical examination." Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 9, no. 2 (April 1, 2012): 81–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.53761/1.9.2.6.
Full textJensen, Bogi Bech. "Oral Assessment in Engineering Education." International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education 47, no. 4 (October 2010): 375–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/ijeee.47.4.2.
Full textFucci, Donald, and Linda Petrosino. "Oral vibrotactile assessment procedures: Modifications." International Journal of Orofacial Myology 21, no. 1 (November 1, 1995): 48–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1995.21.1.7.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Oral assessment"
Joughin, Gordon Rowland, and n/a. "Oral Assessment From the Learner's Perspective: The Experience of Oral Assessment in Post-Compulsory Education." Griffith University. School of Vocational, Technology and Arts Education, 2003. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20031125.091403.
Full textJoughin, Gordon Rowland. "Oral Assessment From the Learner's Perspective: The Experience of Oral Assessment in Post-Compulsory Education." Thesis, Griffith University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366532.
Full textThesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
School of Vocational, Technology and Arts Education
Full Text
Silva, Carvalho M. A. P. "The use of oral assessment in chemistry." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 1988. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.382812.
Full textReilly, Sheena. "The objective assessment of oral motor function during feeding : development and validation of the Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA)." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.283439.
Full textAndreasson, Eva. "Fairness and Flexibility in Oral Examination." Thesis, Umeå University, Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-717.
Full textThis is a descriptive ethnographical study with the purpose of examining teachers’ and students’ experiences of oral examination at a State Pedagogical University in western Russia. The study also focused on finding the characteristics of oral examination and the contextual factors influencing its implementation. The research was done using participatory observations and interviews. The results show that interviewees experience oral assessment in general as positive. Their descriptions are summarised and analysed using a number of key concepts, of which flexibility, subjectivity, individualisation, and fairness are the most important. The study also shows that contextual factors such as culture, traditions, and organisational framework have large impact on how the examination is done. The conclusion is that oral examination has both gins and losses, since the teacher’s active participation creates possibilities for individualisation and deep probing of the students’ knowledge, but is also a source of bias because of its subjectivity.
Björcke, Fresia, and Olafsen Olafsen. "Vårdpersonalen och munbedömningsinstrumentet." Thesis, Högskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för hälsa och samhälle, 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-11431.
Full textBackground: Since oral health has an influence on general health, the mouth can’t be viewed as separate from the rest of the body. Aim: To highlight the importance the use of an oral assessment tool has for the nursing staff. Method: A literature review. Result: Through analysis of the text content two subcategories emerged; Gives possibility to detect and Clarifies further need of oral assessment. They led to the category: The oral assessment tool gives structure. Discussion: By performing an oral assessment on the patient, through detection and correction of oral health problems suffering can be reduced/ prevented by the nursing staff. All of the nursing staff must understand why oral care and oral assessments are important and the oral assessment tool needs to be dependable and easy to use. In every type of health organization there needs to be routines for the use of the oral assessment tool, it should be selected with care and adjusted to the organization. Conclusion: The use of an oral assessment tool could lead to an increased structure in the oral care nursing provided by the nursing staff.
Madera, Anaya Meisser Vidal. "Quality assessment of scientific evidence about diagnosis and treatments for oral cancer." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/671183.
Full textEl cáncer oral es considerado un problema de salud pública globalmente. Este tiene una tasa de supervivencia a los 5 años del 50%, debido a que su diagnóstico se realiza comúnmente en estadios avanzados. En su tratamiento usualmente participa un equipo multidisciplinario para proporcionar una atención integral a los individuos que padecen esta enfermedad. Actualmente, existe un número considerable de publicaciones científicas que sugieren el uso de diferentes opciones terapéuticas y recomendaciones para su diagnóstico; sin embargo, la calidad de esta evidencia se desconoce. Por lo tanto, se requiere una evaluación crítica de la evidencia sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de cáncer oral. Tres estudios independientes fueron realizados usando diferentes diseños metodológicos. Para describir y evaluar la calidad de la evidencia científica sobre el diagnóstico y tratamientos para el cáncer oral, se diseñó y realizó: i) un estudio de mapeo de la evidencia para describir la evidencia disponible sobre principales intervenciones terapéuticas para cáncer oral; ii) un estudio de evaluación crítica sistemática para determinar la calidad de guías de práctica clínica sobre tratamientos de cáncer oral, y iii) un estudio de evaluación critica sistemática para determinar la calidad de guías de práctica clínica sobre diagnóstico de cáncer oral, y describir sus recomendaciones. El estudio de mapeo de la evidencia incluyó 15 revisiones sistemáticas abarcando 118 estudios primarios; de estos 55,1% fueron ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados. Diez revisiones sistemáticas tuvieron una calidad metodológica “muy baja”. Treinta preguntas PICOs fueron extraídas, las cuales se enfocaron en intervenciones como cirugía, radioterapia, quimioterapia, terapia dirigida e inmunoterapia; 18 PICOs eran para cáncer oral operable, de las cuales ocho fueron reportadas como beneficiosa. Hubo 12 PICOs para cáncer oral inoperable, de las cuales solo dos fueron reportadas como beneficiosas. En el segundo estudio se incluyeron 12 guías de práctica clínica. Los puntajes promedio para cada dominio del AGREE II fueron: “alcance y propósito” 88,4%±12,4%; “participación de los interesados” 60,4%±25%; “rigor de desarrollo” 60,9%±25,3%; “claridad de presentación” 76,5%±19,8%; “aplicabilidad” 32,2%±30,7%; y “independencia editorial” 61,6%±35,5%. Tres guías fueron clasificadas como “recomendada”, seis como “recomendada con modificaciones”; y tres como “no recomendada”. En el último estudio ocho guías de práctica clínica fueron seleccionadas. Los puntajes en mediana para los seis dominios del AGREE II fueron: “alcance y propósito” 97,9% (RIC: 96,2-100%); “participación de los interesados” 86,1% (RIC: 69,8-93,1%); “rigor de desarrollo” 75,3% (RIC: 64,2-94,3%); “claridad de presentación” 91,7% (RIC: 82,6-94,4%); “aplicabilidad” 53,1% (RIC: 19,3-74,2%); y “independencia editorial” 83,3% (RIC: 67,2-93,8%). Cuatro guías fueron clasificadas como “recomendada”, cuatro como “recomendada con modificaciones” y ninguna como “no recomendada”. Se identificaron 23 recomendaciones, en su mayoría basadas en nivel de evidencia “baja” o “muy baja”. En general, la evidencia científica sobre los tratamientos de cáncer oral es limitada y su calidad es muy baja. Asimismo, la calidad metodológica de guías de práctica clínica sobre diagnóstico y tratamientos para el cáncer oral fue considerada desde subóptima hasta moderada. Además, la mayoría de sus recomendaciones fueron basadas en un nivel de evidencia “baja”. Estos hallazgos resaltan la necesidad de realizar futuras investigaciones sobre nuevos tratamientos y vacíos del conocimiento identificados en esta área; asimismo mayores esfuerzos son necesarios para permitir el desarrollo de guías basadas en evidencia de alta calidad para cáncer oral.
Oral cancer is considered a public health problem worldwide. It has a 5-year survival rate of 50% due to diagnosis are commonly performed at advanced stage of the disease. Its treatment usually involves a multidisciplinary team to provide comprehensive healthcare to people that suffer from this disease. Nowadays, there is a vast number of scientific publications suggesting the use of different therapeutic interventions and recommendations for its diagnosis, but their quality is unknown. Thus, a critical appraisal of evidence about diagnosis and treatments for oral cancer is needed. Three independent studies were carried out using different methodology designs. In order to describe and assess the quality of scientific evidence on diagnosis and treatments for oral cavity cancer, we designed and conducted: i) an evidence mapping study to describe the available evidence about the main therapeutic interventions for oral cancer; ii) a systematically critical assessment study to determine the quality of clinical practice guidelines on treatments for oral cavity cancer; and iii) a systematically critical assessment study to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines on oral cancer diagnosis, and to describe their recommendations. The evidence mapping study included 15 systematic reviews involving 118 primary studies, of which 55.1% were randomized controlled clinical trials. Ten systematic reviews scored “critically low” methodological quality. We extracted 30 PICOs focusing on interventions such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy; 18 PICOs were for resectable oral cancer, of which 8 were reported as beneficial. There were 12 PICOs for unresectable oral cancer, of which only 2 interventions were reported as beneficial. In the second study, 12 clinical practice guidelines were included. The mean scores for each AGREE II domain were the following: “scope and purpose” 88.4%±12.4%; “stakeholder involvement” 60.4%±25%; “rigor of development” 60.9%±25.3%; “clarity of presentation” 76.5%±19.8%; “applicability” 32.2%±30.7%; and “editorial independence” 61.6%±35.5%. Three guidelines were rated as “recommended”; six as “recommended with modifications”; and three as “not recommended”. In the last study, eight clinical practice guidelines were selected. The median scores of the six AGREE II domains were as follows: “scope and purpose” 97.9% (IQR: 96.2-100.0%); “stakeholder involvement” 86.1% (IQR: 69.8-93.1%); “rigor of development” 75.3% (IQR: 64.2-94.3%); “clarity of presentation” 91.7% (IQR: 82.6-94.4%); “applicability” 53.1% (IQR: 19.3-74.2%); and “editorial independence” 83.3% (IQR: 67.2-93.8%). Four guidelines were assessed as “recommended”, four “recommended with modifications”, and none “not recommended”. Twenty-three recommendations were provided, mostly with a low or very low level of evidence. Overall, the scientific evidence about treatments for oral cancer is limited and its quality is critically low. Likewise, the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines on diagnosis and treatments for oral cancer was rated from suboptimal to moderate. Moreover, most recommendations were based on a low level of evidence. These findings highlight the need to address future research focused on new treatments and knowledge gaps identified in this field, and increased efforts are required to enable the development of high-quality evidence-based guidelines for oral cancer.
Peng, Jui-ching Fion. "Peer assessment of oral presentation in an EFL context." [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University, 2009. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3380148.
Full textTitle from PDF t.p. (viewed on Jul 14, 2010). Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: 4650. Adviser: Larry Mikulecky.
Bennett, Ewan Murdoch. "Optimisation and mechanistic assessment of an oral influenza vaccine." Thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2010. http://digitool.lib.strath.ac.uk:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=25983.
Full textD'Arcy, Susan. "Development of methodologies for the assessment of oral prostheses." Thesis, Robert Gordon University, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.267545.
Full textBooks on the topic "Oral assessment"
El-Kattan, Ayman F. Oral Bioavailability Assessment. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118916926.
Full textAvila, Edward A. De. LAS: Language assessment scales : oral. 2nd ed. Monterey, Calif: CTB/McGraw-Hill, 2004.
Find full textMoon, Russ. Oral assessment in GCSE Economics. London: University of London, Institute of Education, 1988.
Find full textAvila, Edward A. De. LAS: Language assessment scales : oral. Monterey, Calif: CTB/McGraw-Hill, 1990.
Find full textChapple, Iain L. C., and Panos N. Papapanou, eds. Risk Assessment in Oral Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38647-4.
Full textDressman, J. B., and C. Reppas. Oral drug absorption: Prediction and assessment. 2nd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare USA, 2010.
Find full textB, Dressman J., and Lennernäs Hans, eds. Oral drug absorption: Prediction and assessment. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2000.
Find full textMassachusetts. Dept. of Education. The Massachusetts English language assessment - oral handbook. [Malden, Mass.]: The Dept., 1994.
Find full textMaria Arminda Pedrosa e Silva Carvalho. The use of oral assessment in chemistry. Norwich: University of East Anglia, 1988.
Find full textS, Treister Nathaniel, and Pinto Andres 1972-, eds. Risk assessment and oral diagnostics in clinical dentistry. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Oral assessment"
Hughes, Vera, and David Weller. "Oral Assessment." In Self Presentation Skills, 28–36. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11970-7_3.
Full textDombrowski, Stefan C. "Oral Reporting." In Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing, 539–53. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44641-3_21.
Full textDombrowski, Stefan C. "Oral Reporting." In Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing, 327–38. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1911-6_18.
Full textSherrin, David. "Oral Communication." In Authentic Assessment in Social Studies, 133–60. New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.: Eye on Education, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429261114-9.
Full textHutchinson, Steve. "Assessing oral presentations." In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, 88–100. Second Edition. | New York : Routledge, 2019. | “[First edition published by Routledge 2006]”—T.p. verso.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429506857-8.
Full textMillard, Benjamin, and Deryle Lonsdale. "French oral proficiency assessment." In Variation within and across Romance Languages, 401–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.26mil.
Full textCrall, James J., Rocio B. Quinonez, and Andrea F. Zandoná. "Caries risk assessment." In Early Childhood Oral Health, 193–220. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119101741.ch10.
Full textEkstrand, K. R., D. T. Zero, S. Martignon, and N. B. Pitts. "Lesion Activity Assessment." In Monographs in Oral Science, 63–90. Basel: KARGER, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000224213.
Full textSonis, Stephen T. "The Epidemiology and Risk Assessment of Mucositis." In Oral Mucositis, 15–24. Tarporley: Springer Healthcare Ltd., 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-907673-46-7_3.
Full textFischer, Dena J., Nathaniel S. Treister, and Andres Pinto. "Oral Infection." In Risk Assessment and Oral Diagnostics in Clinical Dentistry, 107–21. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118783283.ch7.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Oral assessment"
Song, Lihui. "Self-assessment in Oral English Teaching." In 2013 International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/asshm-13.2013.10.
Full textRubins, Uldis, Zbignevs Marcinkevics, Robert Andrianirina Muckle, Ieva Henkuzena, Andris Roze, and Andris Grabovskis. "Remote photoplethysmography for assessment of oral mucosa." In Preclinical and Clinical Optical Diagnostics, edited by J. Quincy Brown and Ton G. van Leeuwen. SPIE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2526979.
Full textNisse, Ye, S. Robert, J. Wicky, S. Henn-Ménétré, and B. Demoré. "4CPS-246 Palatability assessment of oral medication." In 24th EAHP Congress, 27th–29th March 2019, Barcelona, Spain. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-eahpconf.395.
Full textWet, Febe de, Christa van der Walt, and Thomas Niesler. "Automatic large-scale oral language proficiency assessment." In Interspeech 2007. ISCA: ISCA, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2007-90.
Full textHusain, Hasrul, and Hening Tuti Hendarti. "The Assessment Methods of Oral Mucositis Severity." In The 7th International Meeting and The 4th Joint Scientific Meeting in Dentistry. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0007292500810086.
Full textSaefurrohman, Saefurrohman. "EFL Teachers Assessment Methods in Oral Communications." In Proceedings of the 5th Asia Pasific Education Conference (AECON 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aecon-18.2018.52.
Full textKimani, Everlyne, Prasanth Murali, Ameneh Shamekhi, Dhaval Parmar, Sumanth Munikoti, and Timothy Bickmore. "Multimodal Assessment of Oral Presentations using HMMs." In ICMI '20: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418888.
Full textRouser, Kurt P. "Oral Assessments of Student Learning in Undergraduate Aerospace Propulsion and Power Courses." In ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2017-64082.
Full textBernstein, Jared, Jian Cheng, Jennifer Balogh, and Elizabeth Rosenfeld. "Studies of a Self-Administered Oral Reading Assessment." In 7th ISCA Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education. ISCA: ISCA, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/slate.2017-30.
Full textOhmann, Peter. "An Assessment of Oral Exams in Introductory CS." In SIGCSE '19: The 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287489.
Full textReports on the topic "Oral assessment"
Bienkowski, Sarah C., Milton V. Cahoon, Reanna P. Harman, Ryan Phillips, Eric A. Surface, Stephen J. Ward, Sheila L. Wilcox, and Natalie Wright. Special Operations Forces Language and Culture Needs Assessment: Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, November 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada634215.
Full textGutierrez-Arias, Ruvistay, Gabriel Salgado-Maldonado, Viviana Vidal Ojeda, Paola Letelier Valdivia, Francisco Salinas-Barahona, Carmen Echeverría-Valdebenito, and Pamela Seron. Frequency and assessment of swallowing disorders in adults on high-flow nasal cannula in critical and non-critical care settings. A scoping review protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, November 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.11.0078.
Full textStern, Jonathan M. B., and Benjamin Piper. Resetting Targets: Examining Large Effect Sizes and Disappointing Benchmark Progress. RTI Press, April 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2019.op.0060.1904.
Full textOttinger, C. L., and E. D. Collins. Assessment of potential ORNL contributions to supply of molybdenum-99. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/231363.
Full textGeist, G. A. CRADA ORNL 91-0046B final report: Assessment of IBM advanced computing architectures. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/221925.
Full textTonn, Bruce Edward, Erin M. Rose, and Mark P. Ternes. The ORNL Indoor Air Quality Study: Re-cap, Context, and Assessment on Radon. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1223675.
Full textMorris, Robert Noel. An Assessment of ORNL PIE Capabilities for the AGR Program Capsule Post Irradiation Examination. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/932606.
Full textLubowa, Nasser, Zita Ekeocha, Stephen Robert Byrn, and Kari L. Clase. Pharmaceutical Industry in Uganda: A Review of the Common GMP Non-conformances during Regulatory Inspections. Purdue University, December 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284317442.
Full textNanstad, R. K., T. Yamamoto, and M. A. Sokolov. Post-irradiation Examination Plan for ORNL and University of California Santa Barbara Assessment of UCSB ATR-2 Irradiation Experiment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1120147.
Full textThorne, D. J., L. M. McDowell-Boyer, D. C. Kocher, C. A. Little, and E. K. Roemer. ORNL results for Test Case 1 of the International Atomic Energy Agency`s research program on the safety assessment of Near-Surface Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10167328.
Full text