Academic literature on the topic 'Online discussion'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Online discussion.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Online discussion"
Skinner, Barbara. "Online Discussion." Journal of Studies in International Education 14, no. 4 (December 11, 2008): 335–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315308327866.
Full textBuckley, Fiona. "Online Discussion Forums." European Political Science 10, no. 3 (January 7, 2011): 402–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.76.
Full textHancock, Cheryl, and Barbara Rowland. "Online and out of synch: Using discussion roles in online asynchronous discussions." Cogent Education 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 1368613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2017.1368613.
Full textZheng, Binbin, Gary Beck Dallaghan, Michael Gomez, and Stephen Holihan. "Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter." Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development 9 (January 2022): 238212052110727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211072723.
Full textKrisnan, Alice Shanthi Kasawi, Purwarno Purwarno, and Andang Suhendi. "Communicative Guanxi: Making Online Discussion Forums Come Alive." International Journal of Social Science Research 10, no. 2 (July 19, 2022): 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v10i2.19953.
Full textLevine, S. Joseph. "The online discussion board." New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2007, no. 113 (2007): 67–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ace.248.
Full textAlsinet, Teresa, Josep Argelich, Ramón Béjar, and Santi Martínez. "Measuring Polarization in Online Debates." Applied Sciences 11, no. 24 (December 14, 2021): 11879. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app112411879.
Full textSubramaniam, Nantha Kumar. "Enhancing learning through the discussion forum." Asian Association of Open Universities Journal 7, no. 1 (September 1, 2012): 63–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-07-01-2012-b006.
Full textOmar, Azura Binti, and Nor Farizah Binti Mohd Taib. "ONLINE DISCUSSION STRATRGIES TO FACILITATE STUDENTS DISCUSSION FOR A SPECIFIC ACADEMIC PURPOSES COURSE AT A TECHNICAL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY." FRASA: English Education and Literature Journal 3, no. 2 (September 29, 2022): 89–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.47701/frasa.v3i2.2309.
Full textSeo, Ji-ah, Su-rim Kim, and Sook-ki Choi. "Study on the Asynchronous Online Discussion Participation Patterns of University Student Readers Using Social Network Analysis." Korean Journal of Teacher Education 39, no. 1 (January 31, 2023): 317–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.14333/kjte.2023.39.1.14.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Online discussion"
Gallant, Jenny Jin Ying. "Dilemmas in an online academic discussion." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/16682.
Full textWang, Benjamin Luke. "Developing courseware to support online discussion." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33384.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. 55).
For my Master of Engineering thesis, I designed and implemented an online discussion forum in an attempt to improve student learning. Aided with the help of Professor Jonathon Cummings 15.351 course (Introduction to Innovation and Entrepreneurship), I measured student and peer-to-peer interaction via online discussion boards and user-generated interest in the subject matter. Based on the data received from this discussion board, I have found that students have their own optimal learning environments, and that anonymity can affect the way students interact with one another.
by Benjamin Luke Wang.
M.Eng.
Zheng, Xueling, and 郑雪玲. "Detection of sockpuppets in online discussion forums." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2011. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B4660327X.
Full textAbu, Ziden Azidah. "Personal Learning in Online Discussions." Thesis, University of Canterbury. University Centre for Teaching and Learning, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/1063.
Full textLou, Lai Chu. "Alternative political discussion in Macau's online forums." Thesis, University of Macau, 2008. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b1874131.
Full textAragón, Pablo. "Characterizing online participation in civic technologies." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/668042.
Full textEsta tesis constituye una de las primeras investigaciones en caracterizar la participación online en tecnologías cívicas, un tipo de plataforma cada vez más popular en Internet que permite a la ciudadanía nuevas formas, a una mayor escala, de participación política. Dadas las oportunidades de las tecnologías cívicas para la gobernanza democrática, cabe señalar que su diseño, al igual que el de cualquier plataforma online, no es neutral. La forma en que se presenta la información o se permite la interacción entre las usuarias puede alterar en gran medida los resultados de la participación. Por este motivo, analizamos el impacto de diferentes intervenciones en tecnologías cívicas en relación a las vistas de las conversaciones online, los criterios de ordenación en rankings de peticiones e interfaces deliberativas. Dado que estas intervenciones fueron llevadas a cabo por los propios equipos de desarrollo, los análisis han requerido desarrollar nuevos métodos computacionales y estadísticos, a la vez que se han ampliado modelos generativos de hilos de discusión para caracterizar mejor la dinámica de las conversaciones online. Los resultados de los diferentes estudios de caso destacan el impacto social y político de estas intervenciones, sugiriendo nuevas líneas de investigación en el futuro y la necesidad de desarrollar un paradigma de experimentación ciudadana para la democracia.
Aquesta tesi és una de les primeres investigacions que té per objecte la caracterització de la participació en línia en tecnologies cíviques, un tipus de plataforma cada vegada més popular a Internet que permet a la ciutadania noves formes, a major escala, de participació política. Donades les oportunitats de les tecnologies cíviques per a la governança democràtica, cal assenyalar que el seu disseny, com el de qualsevol plataforma en línia, no és neutral. La forma en què com es presenta la informació o es permet la interacció entre les usuàries pot alterar en gran mesura els resultats de la participació. Per aquest motiu, analitzem l'impacte de diferents intervencions en tecnologies cíviques en relació amb les vistes de conversa en línia, els criteris d'ordenació en rànquings de peticions i amb interfícies deliberatives. Atès que aquestes intervencions van ser dutes a terme pels propis equips de desenvolupament, les anàlisis han requerit desenvolupar nous mètodes computacionals i estadístics, alhora que s'han ampliat models generatius de fils de discussió per caracteritzar millor la dinàmica de les converses en línia. Els resultats dels diferents estudis de cas destaquen l'impacte social i polític d'aquestes intervencions, suggerint noves línies d'investigació en el futur i la necessitat de desenvolupar un paradigma d'experimentació ciutadana per a la democràcia.
Cette thèse constitue l'une des premières recherches sur la caractérisation de la participation en ligne à des technologies civiques, un type de plateforme de plus en plus populaire sur Internet qui permet aux citoyens de nouvelles formes, à plus grande échelle, de participation politique. Compte tenu des opportunités offertes par les technologies civiques dans la gouvernance démocratique, il convient de noter que leur design, comme celui de toute plateforme en ligne, n'est pas neutre. La façon dont l'information est présentée ou l'interaction entre les utilisateurs est permise peut grandement modifier les résultats de la participation. Pour cette raison, nous analysons l'impact de différentes interventions dans le domaine des technologies civiques par rapport à l’agencementaux des conversations en ligne, aux critères d'ordre de classement des pétitions et aux interfaces délibératives. Comme ces interventions ont été réalisées par les équipes de développement correspondantes, les analyses ont nécessité de développer nouvelles méthodes informatiques et statistiques, tout en élargissant les modèles génératifs de fils de discussion afin de mieux caractériser la dynamique des conversations en ligne. Les résultats des différentes études de cas mettent en évidence l'impact social et politique de ces interventions, suggérant de nouveaux axes de recherches futures et la nécessité de développer un paradigme d'expérimentation citoyenne pour la démocratie.
Parisio, Martin Luke. "University teachers' conceptions of learning through online discussion." Thesis, The University of Sydney, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/7023.
Full textKlisc, Chris. "Enhancing student learning outcomes in asynchronous online discussion." Thesis, Klisc, Chris (2015) Enhancing student learning outcomes in asynchronous online discussion. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, 2015. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/26222/.
Full textHockersmith, Patrick M. "Reproducing conflict in an online group." Online access for everyone, 2005. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Thesis/Spring2005/p%5Fhockersmith%5F050605.pdf.
Full textAllan, Mary Katherine. "Conceptualising Social Space in Cyberspace: A Study of the Interactions in Online Discussion forums." Thesis, University of Canterbury. Education, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/1051.
Full textBooks on the topic "Online discussion"
Motherhood online. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2011.
Find full textThe discourse of online consumer reviews. New York: Bloomsbury, 2014.
Find full textBarnes, Renee. Fandom and Polarisation in Online Political Discussion. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14039-6.
Full text1944-, Shedletsky Leonard, and Aitken Joan E, eds. Cases on online discussion and interaction: Experiences and outcomes. Hershey PA: Information Science Reference, 2010.
Find full textIncreasing engagement for online and face-to-face learners through online discussion practices. Phoenix, AZ: League for Innovation in the Community College, 2005.
Find full textShedletsky, Leonard. Cases on online discussion and interaction: Experiences and outcomes. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2010.
Find full textDavis, Richard. Politics online: Blogs, chatrooms, and discussion groups in American democracy. New York, NY: Routledge, 2004.
Find full textPolitics online: Blogs, chatrooms, and discussion groups in American democracy. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Find full textCyberville: Clicks, culture, and the creation of an online town. New York: Warner Books, 1998.
Find full textIn line or out of control?: Kommunikative Anschlussnahme in Online-Diskursen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2010.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Online discussion"
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, and Alexis Wichowski. "Political Discussion Online." In The Handbook of Internet Studies, 168–87. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444314861.ch8.
Full textZhan, Zehui, Liming Huo, Xiao Yao, and Baichang Zhong. "Discussion." In China's Formal Online Education under COVID-19, 52–63. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003188261-8.
Full textHew, Khe Foon, and Wing Sum Cheung. "Asynchronous Audio Discussion." In Student Participation in Online Discussions, 103–14. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2370-6_9.
Full textNefes, Türkay Salim. "Discussion and Conclusion." In Online Anti-Semitism in Turkey, 51–56. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137507945_4.
Full textHew, Khe Foon, and Wing Sum Cheung. "Discussion on Strategy Dilemmas." In Student Participation in Online Discussions, 49–61. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2370-6_4.
Full textTrampuš, Mitja, Sinan Sen, Nenad Stojanović, and Marko Grobelnik. "Visualisation of Online Discussion Forums." In Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance, 157–79. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_9.
Full textBierwald, Jan. "Part C: Summary and discussion." In Specialization in Online Innovation Communities, 127–42. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05318-5_4.
Full textHanna, Barbara E., and Juliana de Nooy. "Culture and Online Communication." In Learning Language and Culture via Public Internet Discussion Forums, 19–49. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230235823_2.
Full textHew, Khe Foon, and Wing Sum Cheung. "Case Studies on Peer Facilitation: How to Sustain Participants’ Online Discussion?" In Student Participation in Online Discussions, 77–85. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2370-6_6.
Full textAbawajy, Jemal, and Tai-hoon Kim. "Online Learning Environment: Taxonomy of Asynchronous Online Discussion Forums." In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 706–14. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27207-3_76.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Online discussion"
A. Schultz, Robert. "The Effectiveness of Online Synchronous Discussion." In 2003 Informing Science + IT Education Conference. Informing Science Institute, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/2646.
Full textJamaluddin, M. R., R. Hashim, M. H. M. Hanafiah, M. S. Mohd Zahari, and M. I. Zulkifly. "Performance evaluation of online discussion." In 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cssr.2010.5773689.
Full textDeschamps, Ryan. "Social learning and online discussion." In dg.o 2015: 16th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2757401.2757402.
Full textZhang, Amy X. "Systems for Improving Online Discussion." In UIST '17: The 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3131785.3131845.
Full textLieu, Emma. "Designing for Constructive Online Discussion." In 35th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference. BCS Learning & Development, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2022.61.
Full textYamaguchi, Naoko, Takayuki Ito, and Tomohiro Nishida. "A Method for Online Discussion Design and Discussion Data Analysis." In 2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems (KICSS). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/kicss45055.2018.8950662.
Full textSmith, Glenn. "Online Discussion: Identity Versus Anonymity and Discussion With Nonplayer Characters." In 2021 AERA Annual Meeting. Washington DC: AERA, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1686678.
Full text"Predicting Successful Global Online Group Projects from Online Discussion." In 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2009.348.
Full textElyashar, Aviad, Jorge Bendahan, Rami Puzis, and Maria-Amparo Sanmateu. "Measurement of Online Discussion Authenticity within Online Social Media." In ASONAM '17: Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3110025.3110115.
Full textZheng, Xueling, Yiu Ming Lai, K. P. Chow, Lucas C. K. Hui, and S. M. Yiu. "Sockpuppet Detection in Online Discussion Forums." In 2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing (IIH-MSP). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iihmsp.2011.69.
Full textReports on the topic "Online discussion"
O'Leary, Ros. Online Communication using Discussion Boards. The Economics Network, April 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.53593/n1137a.
Full textQuinn, Michael A. Online Projects Using Discussion Boards. Bristol, UK: The Economics Network, January 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.53593/n596a.
Full textLópez-Francés, Inmaculada, Evelyn E. Moctezuma-Ramírez, Fran J. Garcia-Garcia, Natalia Gandia Carbonell, and Cristian Molla Esparza. Design, implementation and evaluation of Online Discussion Forums in undergraduate studies: Protocol for a systematic review. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.6.0029.
Full textMelati, Kuntum, Jaee Nikam, and Phuong Nguyen. Barriers and drivers for enterprises to transition to circular economy. Stockholm Environment Institute, November 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51414/sei2021.029.
Full textRay, Deepayan Basu. An African Response to COVID-19: From principled first response to just recovery. Oxfam, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21201/2021.7444.
Full textAllison-Cassin, Stacy, Sean Hillier, Alan Odjig Corbiere, Deborah McGregor, and Joy Kirchner. Perspectives on Openness: Honouring Indigenous Ways of Knowing. Chair Rosa Orlandini. York University Libraries, October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.25071/10315/38038.
Full textPikilnyak, Andrey V., Nadia M. Stetsenko, Volodymyr P. Stetsenko, Tetiana V. Bondarenko, and Halyna V. Tkachuk. Comparative analysis of online dictionaries in the context of the digital transformation of education. [б. в.], June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4431.
Full textHobbs, Moira. Tertiary Students’ Numeracy Skills Requirements. Unitec ePress, June 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.34074/ocds.32014.
Full textHobbs, Moira. Tertiary Students’ Numeracy Skills Requirements. Unitec ePress, June 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.34074/ocds.32014.
Full textBrown, Nicholas, Hannah Macdonell, Emilie Stewart-Jones, and Stephan Gruber. Permafrost Data Systems: RCOP 2021 Data Workshop Report. NSERC/Carleton University, November 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22215/pn/10121001.
Full text