Journal articles: 'Object relations theory'

1

ALPERT, JAMES. "Object Relations Theory." American Journal of Psychiatry 147, no. 7 (July 1990): 961—a—962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.147.7.961-a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Gertrude and Rubin Blanck. "Developmental object relations theory." Clinical Social Work Journal 15, no. 4 (1987): 318–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00752967.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Nicholson, Barbara. "Object Relations Theory Revisited:." Journal of Independent Social Work 2, no. 3 (July 14, 1988): 25–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j283v02n03_04.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Ingram, Douglas H., and Joyce A. Lerner. "Horney theory: An object relations theory." American Journal of Psychoanalysis 52, no. 1 (March 1992): 37–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01253441.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Buchele, Bonnie J., and J. Scott Rutan. "An Object Relations Theory Perspective." International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 67, sup1 (January 27, 2017): S36—S43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2016.1238748.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Christopher, John Chambers, Mark H. Bickhard, and Gregory Scott Lambeth. "Otto Kernberg's Object Relations Theory." Theory & Psychology 11, no. 5 (October 2001): 687–711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354301115006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

WINER, JEROME A. "Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory." American Journal of Psychiatry 142, no. 2 (February 1985): 256–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.142.2.256.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Felski, R. "Object Relations." Contemporary Women's Writing 1, no. 1-2 (December 1, 2007): 185–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cww/vpm006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Levin, G. D. "Classical theory of analysis and synthesis." Philosophy of Science and Technology 25, no. 2 (2020): 103–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2021-25-2-103-115.

Full text

Abstract:

The article explores the classical understanding of analysis as the mental decomposition of the studied object into components and synthesis as the mental combination of these components into a whole. The naive understanding of analysis as the mental decomposition of anything into any parts is criticized. It is opposed by the assertion that at the analytical stage of the study of an object we gain the knowledge about its components, and at the synthetic stage we gain the knowledge about those relationships that combine these components into a whole object. A generalized understanding of synthesis as a knowledge of relations between any objects and analysis as a knowledge of the carriers of these relations is introduced. Based on the material of the history of the study of value relations – Wertverhältnis – the epistemological mechanism of a holistic analytical and synthetic research is investigated. The relation of the classical theory of analysis and synthesis to nonclassical is clarified.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Todorovic, Milorad. "Clinical review of object relations theory." Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Pristini 44, no. 2 (2014): 291–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/zrffp44-5940.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Field, Nathan. "Healing, Exorcism and Object Relations Theory." British Journal of Psychotherapy 6, no. 3 (March 1990): 274–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.1990.tb01287.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Gerson, Gal. "Liberalism, sociability, and object relations theory." European Legacy 10, no. 5 (August 2005): 421–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10848770500173623.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Lerner, Paul M. "Object Relations Theory and the Rorschach." Rorschachiana 18, no. 1 (January 1993): 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604.18.1.45.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Morrison, Thomas L. "Object Relations Theory and Marital Interaction." Journal of Couples Therapy 7, no. 2-3 (August 23, 1998): 33–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j036v07n02_04.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

SOLOMON, HESTER M. "Archetypal Psychology and Object Relations Theory:." Journal of Analytical Psychology 36, no. 3 (July 1991): 307–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1991.00307.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Seidman, Daniel. "The subject in object relations theory." New Ideas in Psychology 8, no. 2 (January 1990): 269–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0732-118x(90)90018-w.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Gerson, Gal. "Object Relations Psychoanalysis as Political Theory." Political Psychology 25, no. 5 (October 2004): 769–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00397.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Kernberg, Otto F. "Object Relations Theory in Clinical Practice." Psychoanalytic Quarterly 57, no. 4 (October 1988): 481–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1988.11927218.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Ryzhenkov, Anatoly. "Subjects and Objects of Environmental Legal Relations." Legal Concept, no. 4 (February 2021): 100–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2020.4.13.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: the need to study the category “legal relationship” is generally recognized in the theory of law and state, as well as in all sectoral sciences. However, if the category “legal relationship” is sufficiently developed in relation to the “traditional” branches of law, then this issue remains relevant and new in relation to a fairly young branch of environmental law. The purpose of the research: to show the dynamics of development of modern doctrinal discussions on key issues of the theory of environmental law, namely, the categories of the subject and object of environmental legal relations. Objectives: to show the position of major Russian and foreign scientific schools on the theory of ecological legal relations; to identify the main scientific doctrine concerning the understanding of the subject of environmental legal relations; to consider the existing point of view on the category of the object of ecological relations. Methods: dialectical, system, logical, analysis, synthesis. Results: the dynamics of the doctrinal development of the concept of the subject and object of environmental relationship is investigated; the points of view of the leading environmental law schools of the CIS countries on the existing and prospective subjects of ecological legal relations are considered; the views of modern scholars regarding the recognition of climate as well as the person to be the subject of environmental legal relations are assessed within the category “the object of ecological relationship”. Conclusions: the paper argues that in the theory of environmental law, the categories “subject” and “object” of environmental legal relations are the most discussed today. The emergence of a new subject of environmental legal relations – “future generations”, mentioned in the legislation, seems to be justified. The paper presents a number of arguments in support of the existing proposals to expand the traditional list of the objects of environmental legal relations, with the addition of quasi-natural objects, agricultural ecosystem, climate, and many others.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Mitchell, Arnold. "A response to ?Horney theory: An object relations theory?" American Journal of Psychoanalysis 52, no. 1 (March 1992): 45–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01253442.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Muzika, Edward G. "Object Relations Theory, Buddhism, and the Self." International Philosophical Quarterly 30, no. 1 (1990): 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ipq199030149.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

ying, Feng. "The Theory of Object Relations under Psychoanalysis." Theory and Practice of Psychological Counseling 3, no. 6 (2021): 424–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.35534/tppc.0306052.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Fang, Nini. "Depression reconsidered in Fairbairn’s object relations theory." Psychodynamic Practice 26, no. 1 (January 2, 2020): 20–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2020.1713202.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Hockmeyer, Anne. "Object Relations Theory and Feminism: Strange Bedfellows." Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 10, no. 1 (1988): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3345935.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Ryle, Anthony. "Cognitive theory, object relations and the self." British Journal of Medical Psychology 58, no. 1 (March 1985): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1985.tb02608.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Finkelstein, Lionel. "Psychoanalysis, Marital Therapy, and Object-Relations Theory." Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 36, no. 4 (August 1988): 905–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000306518803600403.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Gerber, Lane. "Beyond Ego Psychology: Developmental Object Relations Theory." American Journal of Psychotherapy 42, no. 1 (January 1988): 157–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1988.42.1.157.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

BAKER, HOWARD S. "Definition of Splitting in Object Relations Theory." American Journal of Psychiatry 147, no. 9 (September 1990): 1252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.147.9.1252.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Clarke, Graham S. "Suttie’s Influence on Fairbairn’s Object Relations Theory." Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 59, no. 5 (October 2011): 939–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003065111422540.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Trachtman, Richard. "Beyond ego psychology: Developmental object relations theory." Clinical Social Work Journal 15, no. 4 (1987): 387–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00752976.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Bornstein, Robert F. "Review of Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory." Psychoanalytic Psychology 2, no. 4 (1985): 373–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.2.4.373.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Lerner, Howard D. "The Widening Scope of Object Relations Theory." Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 38, no. 12 (December 1993): 1321–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/032879.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Randolph, Bonnie J., and Barbara Winstead. "Sexual decision making and object relations theory." Archives of Sexual Behavior 17, no. 5 (October 1988): 389–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01542480.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Waller, Laurie. "Curating actor-network theory: testing object-oriented sociology in the Science Museum." Museum and Society 14, no. 1 (June 9, 2017): 193–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.29311/mas.v14i1.634.

Full text

Abstract:

Across different traditions of social research, the study of science exhibitions has often taken the form of an ‘object-oriented’ inquiry. In this tradition, actor-network theory (ANT) has focused on how the processes of exhibiting objects mediate relations between science and society. Although ANT has not developed as a theory of curating, it nonetheless contributes to revaluing the work performed by curators in relation to the practice of science. This article describes an ethnographic engagement with a curatorial experiment in a science museum which staged a ‘multi-viewpoint’ exhibition of an object. A display of an object ‘in process’, I take the opportunity of this curatorial experiment to explore analogies drawn in ANT studies between museums and laboratories in attending to the ways that curatorial practices mediate science. I ask whether, and to what extent, ANT can account for curating as a material practice that not only participates in domesticating objects for science but also in problematizing, multiplying and redistributing relations between objects and the social.Key words: actor-network theory, sociology, science studies, curating, objects.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

김홍근. "Perspective on ‘Relation’ of the M. Buber's Relations Theology, Object Relations Theory, Spirituality Theology." THEOLOGICAL THOUGHT ll, no. 138 (September 2007): 247–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.35858/sinhak.2007..138.009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Gladkaya, E. "THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE THEORY OF BELONGEST PROPERTY IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES." Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences, no. 14 (January 2, 2022): 109–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.52928/2070-1632-2021-59-14-109-113.

Full text

Abstract:

The article analyzes the main theories of the object of legal relations, in order to establish the possibility of the subsequent use of the results obtained in the course of reforming the approach to the definition of objects of civil legal relations in general and real legal relations in particular. The greatest attention is paid to such theories about the object of legal relations as monistic and pluralistic theories. Their advantages and disadvantages are highlighted. The possibility of their use at the present stage of the development of social relations, due to the influence of the introduction of new technologies, is critically assessed. Some features of other theories about the object of legal relationship, which are currently of little use, are noted. The legislative experience of the EAEU member states on the definition of objects of civil legal relations has been studied. The proposals aimed at developing the theory about the object of civil legal relations have been made.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Howdyshell, Stanford. "The Essences of Objects: Explicating a Theory of Essence in Object-Oriented Ontology." Open Philosophy 3, no. 1 (January 19, 2020): 01–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0001.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractIn this paper, I will discuss the need for a theory of essences within Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO) and then formulate one. I will do so by drawing on Graham Harman’s work on OOO and Martin Heidegger’s thought on the essence of being, presented in his Introduction to Metaphysics. Harman touches on essences, describing them as the tension between a withdrawn object and its withdrawn qualities, but fails to distinguish between essential and inessential qualities within this framework. To fill in the gaps, I will turn to Heidegger’s explication of phusis in order to show that an essential aspect of being is how one enters into causal relations and continually reveals oneself to other beings. In bringing OOO and Heidegger together, I will find that each object has a unique way of exerting itself in the world and that the domestic relations that make up this unique profile are essential to it, while other domestic relations, those that do not influence its particular way of exerting itself, are inessential. Thus, the essence will be found to be the set of domestic relations that make up the determinate form, or unique causal profile, of the object.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Li, Jianing. "Reading Sons and Lovers through Object Relations Theory." International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics 5, no. 2 (September 2, 2022): 57–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.52589/ijlll-7srdv2jd.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT: This paper dissects Paul Morel’s various female and male relationships portrayed in Sons and Lovers by dint of object relations theory. In the course of the investigation, it is gradually revealed that the paradigms of son-mother and son-father relationships reverberate throughout Paul’s life, from which none of his other relationships can be freed. In the final analysis, Paul is only a symbiotic infant caught up in the smothering repetitions of a rash of unsuccessful relationships which he fails to see through till the bitter end. Yet, the vicious cycle in Paul Morel’s life does remind us how repetition can serve as a game-changer at the same time---identifying it alone is the springboard for freedom---that is the ultimate significance of repetition.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Seinfeld, Jeffrey. "ADOLESCENCE AND DELINQUENCY: AN OBJECT RELATIONS THEORY APPROACH." Journal of Teaching in Social Work 29, no. 4 (November 15, 2009): 480–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08841230903356243.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Burns-Smith, Charlene. "Theology and Winnicott's Object Relations Theory: A Conversation." Journal of Psychology and Theology 27, no. 1 (March 1999): 3–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009164719902700101.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Hamilton, N. Gregory, Lawrence H. Sacks, and Catherine A. Hamilton. "Object Relations Theory and Pharmacopsychotherapy of Anxiety Disorders." American Journal of Psychotherapy 48, no. 3 (July 1994): 380–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1994.48.3.380.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Buckley, Peter. "Self Psychology, Object Relations Theory and Supportive Psychotherapy." American Journal of Psychotherapy 48, no. 4 (October 1994): 519–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1994.48.4.519.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Hewitt, Marsha Aileen. "Christian anti-Judaism and early object relations theory." Critical Research on Religion 6, no. 3 (September 24, 2018): 226–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050303218800378.

Full text

Abstract:

The central ideas of early object relations theory are heavily inflected with Christian anti-Judaism, particularly as found in the work of Ian Dishart Suttie, now credited as the founder of this tradition. The critique of Freud launched by Suttie repudiates Freudian theory as a “disease” inextricably connected to Freud being a Jew. Suttie’s portrayal of Judaism both conforms to and replicates those theological commitments that privilege a triumphalist, supersessionist Christianity that breaks with Judaism, understood as devoid of love, ethics, and social justice interests. The paper argues that the elements organizing the central concepts that structure Suttie’s Christian prejudice constitute distorting ideological interests that circulate and shape important strands of contemporary object relations theory. Central to the authors discussed is a repudiation of Freud’s theory of unconscious drives on the basis of privileging love and intersubjectivity as the motivators of human psychological development made possible by Jesus and Christianity. The paper demonstrates that contemporary object relations theory remains heavily indebted to Suttie while remaining oblivious to his explicit anti-Judaism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Eklund, Mona. "Applying Object Relations Theory to Psychosocial Occupational Therapy." Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 15, no. 1 (April 28, 2000): 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j004v15n01_01.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Applegate, Jeffrey S. "Theory, culture, and behavior: Object relations in context." Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal 7, no. 2 (April 1990): 85–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00757647.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Meloy, J. Reid. "Concept and percept formation in object relations theory." Psychoanalytic Psychology 2, no. 1 (1985): 35–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.2.1.35.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Brink, T. L. "Object Relations Theory and Religion: Clinical Applications (Book)." International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 5, no. 1 (January 1995): 69–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0501_9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Kirin, Roman, Petro Baranov, and Igor Koziakov. "Determining the Legal Relations of Gemological Objects of Natural Origin." Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources 05, no. 04 (December 31, 2022): 34–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.050403.

Full text

Abstract:

Determining the essence, correlation and types of objects of law and objects of legal relations is considered one of the most debatable issues in the theory of law, having significant theoretical and practical significance. This article analyzes the constitutional, subsoil and gemological legislation regulating relations arising out from material gemological objects. The objective of this study is to understand intersectoral aspects of gemstones of natural origin, having been considered as an object of legal relations. The methodology comprised of dialectical, comparative legal, formal legal (dogmatic), formal logical, critical legal, systemic-structural and systemic-functional methods. This is the first time when geological-legal science has proposed the foundation of a dualistic theory addressing the multi-level structure of objects of gemological legal relations. It consists of the symbiosis of gemologically-significant actions and goods. The article also proposes general legal definition (an object of gemological law, an object of legal regulation of gemological law, an object of gemological legal relations), and special-legal definition (amber-bearing subsoil, natural gemstones) aimed at developing and improving the national gemological law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Piper, W. "Object relations theory and short-term dynamic psychotherapy Findings from the quality of object relations scale." Clinical Psychology Review 19, no. 6 (September 1999): 669–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00080-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Ju, Ginny, and Irving Biederman. "Tests of a Theory of Human Image Understanding: Part I the Perception of Colored and Partial Objects." Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 30, no. 3 (September 1986): 297–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193128603000322.

Full text

Abstract:

Object recognition can be conceptualized as a process in which the perceptual input is successfully matched with a stored representation of the object. A theory of pattern recognition, Recognition by Components(RBC) assumes that objects are represented as simple volumetric primatives (e.g., bricks, cylinders, etc.) in specifed relations to each other. According to RBC, speeded recognition should be possible from only a few components, as long as those components uniquely identify an object. Neither the full complement of an object's components, nor the object's surface characteristics (e.g., color and texture) need be present for rapid identification. The results from two experiments on the perception of briefly presented objects are offered for supporting the sufficiency of the theory. Line drawings are identified about as rapidly and as accurately as full color slides. Partial objects could be rapidly (though not optimally) identified. Complex objects are more readily identified than simple objects.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Object relations theory'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles