Academic literature on the topic 'Non welfarism'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Non welfarism.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Non welfarism"
Ng, Yew-Kwang. "Welfarism and Utilitarianism: A Rehabilitation." Utilitas 2, no. 2 (November 1990): 171–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0953820800000650.
Full textBaujard, Antoinette. "A return to Bentham'sfelicific calculus: From moral welfarism to technical non-welfarism." European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16, no. 3 (August 25, 2009): 431–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672560903101294.
Full textRavichandran, N. "Regulatory Challenges and Non-profit Welfarism." Journal of Health Management 8, no. 2 (October 2006): 261–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097206340600800207.
Full textHaaga, Paul T., and Michael Sunday Sasa. "A Philosophical Reflection on the Nature and Relevance of Azikiwe’s Political Ideology of Neo-Welfarism." International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI) 2, no. 4 (October 10, 2020): 152–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v2i4.81.
Full textDobuzinskis, Laurent. "Non-welfarism Avant la Lettre: Alfred Fouillée's political economy of justice." European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17, no. 4 (August 4, 2010): 837–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2010.482998.
Full textRIVERA-LÓPEZ, EDUARDO. "ARE MENTAL STATE WELFARISM AND OUR CONCERN FOR NON-EXPERIENTIAL GOALS INCOMPATIBLE?" Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88, no. 1 (March 2007): 74–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00281.x.
Full textGharbi, Jean-Sébastien, and Yves Meinard. "On the meaning of non-welfarism in Kolm’s ELIE model of income redistribution." Journal of Economic Methodology 22, no. 3 (July 3, 2015): 335–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2015.1071504.
Full textShadare, Gbenga Akinlolu. "The Governance of Nigeria’s Social Protection: The Burdens of Developmental Welfarism?" Societies 12, no. 1 (February 8, 2022): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/soc12010020.
Full textWeinzierl, Matthew. "Welfarism's Envy Problem Extends to Popular Judgments." AEA Papers and Proceedings 108 (May 1, 2018): 28–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181001.
Full textBarry, Norman. "SOME FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES TO CONVENTIONAL CAPITALISM." Social Philosophy and Policy 20, no. 1 (December 18, 2002): 178–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265052503201084.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Non welfarism"
Tsuchiya, Aki. "Economics and the social value of health : An exploration of the non-welfarist approach." Kyoto University, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/181284.
Full textPrete, Vincenzo. "Inequality, Polarization and Redistributive Policies." Doctoral thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11562/959719.
Full textThis dissertation focuses on optimal income taxation theory and analyses the effect of different redistributive objectives on the shape of the optimal tax system. In particular, we investigate how the optimal tax system should be designed in order to achieve inequality and polarization reduction objectives. To this end, in line with the works by Kanbur et al. (2006) and Saez and Stantcheva (2016) we adopt a “non-welfarist” (n.w.) approach and focus on piecewise linear tax systems. By choosing the n.w. approach we recognize that redistributive objectives are crucial per se to the determination of the optimal tax schedule, and not necessarily because of the shape of the agents’ utility function. The main difference between welfarism and n.w. is that in the latter the argument of the social welfare function is different from individuals’ utility. Therefore, we focus on income as the most appropriate variable to investigate when the government’s objective is the reduction of inequality, poverty or polarization. We formalize the n.w. objective by assuming that the government maximizes a rank-dependent social evaluation function defined over individuals’ net income, subject to a budget constraint. Then, the evaluation of the income distribution can be summarized by the mean income of the distribution and a linear index of dispersion dependent on the choice of the weighting function. Specifically, we consider two weighting functions which allow to formalize redistributive objectives expressed in terms of changes in the Gini index of income in case of inequality considerations. Then, by suitable modifications of the positional weights it is possible, within the same model, to move towards evaluations concerned with the income polarization. We consider piecewise linear tax systems that represent the most adopted scheme and the easiest way to identify changes in the tax schedule when the government objectives move from inequality to polarization reduction. The results we obtain highlight the relationship between the redistributive objective and the theoretical optimal shape of the tax system. In particular, when redistribution is not allowed and the focus is only on the socially desirable mechanism collecting a given level of per-capita revenue, the optimal tax schemes substantially differ depending on whether the government is inequality or polarization sensitive. With fixed labour supply the optimal tax system reducing inequality requires a no tax area until a given threshold and the maximal admissible taxation above that threshold, which is set in order to satisfy the revenue requirement. As to polarization reduction, the optimal tax system requires to tax with the maximal admissible tax rate all incomes within the central bracket, including also the median income. Tax rates in the two external brackets are set equal to zero. When we introduce constant labour supply elasticity the results are qualitatively confirmed. The optimal tax systems reducing inequality and polarization are respectively convex and non-convex. By introducing the possibility to use lump-sum transfers (tax and subsidy) the design of the optimal tax system is independent of the revenue requirement and the sign of the lump-sum transfer depends on the difference between the collected amount and the required revenue. The optimal tax system reducing inequality (polarization) is convex (non-convex), with marginal tax rates decreasing in the level of the constant labour supply elasticity. The lump-sum transfer is positive or negative depending on the combination of the level of gross income dispersion and the value of labour supply elasticity. Then, the lump-sum taxation is more likely to be used to reduce polarization. Finally, when redistribution is not allowed and assuming non-constant labour supply elasticity the results are qualitatively in line with the case of constant elasticity. However, marginal tax rates are lower for income percentiles exhibiting higher elasticity.
Pragnell, Bradley J. ""Selling consent" : from authoritarianism to welfarism at David Jones, 1838-1958 /." 2001. http://www.library.unsw.edu.au/~thesis/adt-NUN/public/adt-NUN20020731.142216/index.html.
Full textBooks on the topic "Non welfarism"
Dorsey, Dale. The Focus of Interpersonal Morality. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198828310.003.0003.
Full textBrazier, John, Julie Ratcliffe, Joshua A. Salomon, and Aki Tsuchiya. Foundations in welfare economics and utility theory: what should be valued? Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198725923.003.0003.
Full textBrazier, John, Julie Ratcliffe, Joshua A. Salomon, and Aki Tsuchiya. A QALY is a QALY is a QALY—or is it not? Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198725923.003.0010.
Full textDowding, Keith. What Is Welfare and How Can We Measure It? Edited by Don Ross and Harold Kincaid. Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195189254.003.0019.
Full textRobeyns, Ingrid. The Capability Approach. Edited by Serena Olsaretti. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.5.
Full textMcLennan, Rebecca M. Ideal Theory and Historical Complexity. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190888589.003.0008.
Full textCampbell, David. Contractual Relations. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198855156.001.0001.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Non welfarism"
Yoshihara, Naoki. "On Non-Welfarist Social Ordering Functions." In Studies in Choice and Welfare, 43–67. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_4.
Full textChateauneuf, Alain, and Patrick Moyes. "A Non-welfarist Approach to Inequality Measurement." In Inequality, Poverty and Well-being, 22–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230625594_3.
Full textSmith, Michael. "Deontological Moral Obligations and Non-Welfarist Agent-Relative Values." In Developing Deontology, 1–13. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118368794.ch1.
Full textMedema, Steven G. "Non-welfarism in the Early Debates over the Coase Theorem." In Welfare Theory, Public Action, and Ethical Values, 208–31. Cambridge University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108882507.010.
Full text"On the meaning of non-welfarism in Kolm’s ELIE model of income redistribution." In The Future of the Philosophy of Economics, 87–105. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315462059-12.
Full text"Non-Welfarist Arguments." In Radical Life Extension, 247–307. mentis Verlag, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/9783957439949_007.
Full textRivera-López, Eduardo. "What Does Nozick’s Experience Machine Argument Really Prove?" In The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, 100–105. Philosophy Documentation Center, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/wcp20-paideia199840722.
Full textBevir, Mark. "Welfarism, Socialism, and Religion." In The Making of British Socialism. Princeton University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691150833.003.0011.
Full textTuomala, Matti. "Optimal income taxes/transfers and non-welfarist social objectives." In Optimal Redistributive Taxation, 235–48. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198753414.003.0009.
Full textGilardone, Muriel. "The Influence of Sen’s Applied Economics on His Non-welfarist Approach to Justice." In Welfare Theory, Public Action, and Ethical Values, 298–319. Cambridge University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108882507.014.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Non welfarism"
Ji-hong, Duan, Lv Wen-hui, Huang Shan-shan, Deng Xin, and Duan Ji-hong. "From Welfarism to Non-welfarism: Literature Review on the Evolution of Welfare Economics System." In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Contemporary Education and Economic Development (CEED 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ceed-18.2018.64.
Full text