Relevant bibliographies by topics / Niklaus Luhmann / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Niklaus Luhmann'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Niklaus Luhmann.
Author: Grafiati
Published: 27 July 2024
Last updated: 28 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Niklaus Luhmann.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Salem, A. "Veiksmas ir komunikacija niklaso luhmanno socialinėje teorijoje." Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas 33, no. 2 (January 1, 2013): 70–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/socmintvei.2013.2.3808.

Full text
Abstract:
Santrauka. Straipsnyje siekiama atskleisti keletą intriguojančių Niklaso Luhmanno socialinės teorijos aspektų. Trumpai aptarus, kaip Luhmannas nutolsta nuo ankstesnių funckionalizmo formų (ypač Talcotto Parsonso idėjų) ir kaip jo darbai iš esmės skiriasi nuo esencializmo, fundamentalizmo ir humanizmo, parodoma, kuo svarbi jo siūloma nevaržomų socialinių struktūrų teorija. Kalbama apie tokias struktūras, kurių reprodukcija nepriklauso nuo išorinių veiksnių, o pati reprodukcija traktuojama kaip nesibaigiantis procesas, kuriame, Luhmanno teigimu, žmogiškieji subjektai nevaidina jokio vaidmens. Vėliau kritinėje Luhmanno visuomenės teorijos analizėje pereinama prie svarstymų, koks vaidmuo tenka komunikacijai ir jos efektyvumą ribojan­tiems veiksniams, koks yra atotrūkis tarp žmogaus veiksmo ir komunikacijos sistemos. Straipsnio pabaigoje siekiama įvertinti, ar ir kaip Luhmanno teorija gali būti pritaikyta socialinėje kritikoje. Teigiama, kad ne­paisant rimtų teorijos trūkumų, ji visgi gali atnaujinti visuomenės kritinę mintį ir suteikti jai naują kryptį. ABSTRACT ACTION AND COMMUNICATION IN NIKLAS LUHMANN’S SOCIAL THEORY ‘Everyone knows, of course, that the word “human being” is not a human being. We must alsolearn that there is nothing in the unity of an object that corresponds to the word. Wordssuch as “human being,” “soul,” “person,” “subject,” and “individual” are nothingmore than what they effect in communication’(LUHMANN 2002; 183) This article offers a critical introduction to some of the most striking features of Niklas Luhmann’s social theory. It opens with a discussion of Luhmann’s departure from older forms of functionalism (above all the ideas of Parsons), and of how his work marks a distinct break with essentialism, foundationalism and humanism. This is followed by an account of the importance to his theory of free-form social structures that can reproduce themselves in ways not determined by external forces, a never-ending process in which, on Luhmann’s account, human agents have no part to play. Next the place and role of communication (and of obstacles to communicative efficacy) in his vision of society are examined, and the decisive split between human action and communication systems in his work is further discussed. Finally, some of the implications of Luhmann’s theory for social critique are drawn out, and it is argued that, despite posing serious difficulties for the idea of criticism as conventionally conceived, this theory might actually help to renew it. Keywords: communications theory, cybernetics, human action, post-humanism, social change, social criticism, social systems, social theory. Pagrindiniai žodžiai: komunikacijos teorija, kibernetika, socialinis veiksmas, post-humanizmas, socialiniai pokyčiai, socialinė kritika, socialinės sistemos, socialinė teorija.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jovanoski, Aleksandar, and Agron Rustemi. "The Controversy between Niklas Luhmann and Jűrgen Habermas Related to Sociological Approach to Law." SEEU Review 16, no. 1 (June 12, 2021): 3–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2021-0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The aim of the paper is to present a brief insight into the significant works and views of the German sociologists Niklas Luhmann and Jűrgen Habermas on the role of law in regulating human relations in society. Educated as a lawyer, Niklas Luhmann in the late academic career was under the influence of the American sociologist Talcott Parsons. Niklas Luhmann later, under the influence of the American sociologist Talcott Parsons, he built a sociological theoretical system called the systems theory. On the other side, Jűrgen Habermas was a philosopher and sociologist, highly influenced by the Frankfurt school of sociology. According to Luhmann‘s systems theory, the social reality and the separate aspects of the social life are part of a deeper system called society, and in relation to the same they are set as subsystems. Social systems are divided into allopoietic and autopoietic. One of the significant axioms of Luhmann’s theory is that the largest number of systems tends to simplify due to the pressure of the environment for greater efficiency. Law in Luhman’s systems theory enjoys the status of an autonomous system for regulating society, rather than an instrumental contribution to politics. This brief review exposed a big clash between two influential German thinkers. In this paper we are going to use historical method and analysing of the content of different materials and previous authors that are dealing with the work of Niklas Luhmann and Jűrgen Habermas.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Šubrt, J. "Niklas Luhmann’s system theory: A critical analysis." RUDN Journal of Sociology 19, no. 4 (December 15, 2019): 607–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-4-607-616.

Full text
Abstract:
This article considers the nature of the theoretical legacy - the system theory - of the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann. The author focuses on three topics: first, he briefly describes Luhmann’s ideas in the context of the contemporary sociological thought; second, he identidies how Luhmann’s works are perceived today; third, he presents a new reflection on Luhmann’s works. Paradigmatically, Luhmann’s ideas can be attributed to the system theory, neo-functionalism and radical constructivism due to his efforts to find inspiration in natural sciences. At the same time, Luhmann found himself in the close position to the traditions of the German philosophical idealism. Although the system theory is holistic in nature, Luhmann used for its elaboration elements of the individualist-oriented approach (based on Max Weber’s ideas). Thus, in Luhmann’s conception, systems become holistic entities that, like individual subjects, are capable of making decisions and managing themselves. One of the strengths of Luhmann’s conception is determined by his evolutionary theory consistent with random (in Luhmann’s terms - contingent) development connected with the idea of an open future. As with Parsons, in Luhmann’s conception we find emphasis on the consensus ensured by communication processes. However, what is missing, are the topics of work, production, conflict, struggle and violence. The current decline in the interest in Luhmann’s works has been reinforced by the fact that he was unable to translate his conceptions into instruments for the empirical sociological research. Nevertheless, Luhmann’s theory of a functionally differentiated society and its consequences still represents a significant stimulus for the contemporary sociological thought.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Steger, Florian, and Maximilian Schochow. "Antoni Kępińskis „Informationsmetabolismus“ und Niklas Luhmanns „Autopoiesis“. Zwei Begriffe – ein Konzept?" Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica, no. 28 (December 30, 2016): 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.28.05.

Full text
Abstract:
Die Konzepte „Informationsmetabolismus“ von Antoni Kępiński und „Autopoiesis“ von Niklas Luhmann rekurrieren auf die Struktur biologischer Zellen. Beide Autoren übertragen diese biologischen Strukturen auf ihre jeweiligen Anwendungsfelder. Während Kępiński die Funktionsweise der Psyche zu bestimmen sucht, integriert Luhmann den biologischen Ansatz in seine Systemtheorie der lebenden und psychischen Systeme. Bei der Lektüre von Kępińskis und Luhmanns Arbeiten wird deutlich, dass beide Autoren das Verhältnis zwischen einerseits Psyche und andererseits psychischem System mit ihrer jeweiligen Umwelt näher bestimmen. In Luhmanns Werk ist das Verhältnis zwischen System und Umwelt umfangreich beschrieben und ausgearbeitet. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden seine Ausführungen im Folgenden verwendet, um Kępińskis Überlegungen zum „Informationsmetabolismus“, dem Verhältnis von Psyche und Umwelt, zu reflektieren.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

King, Michael, and Chris Thornhill. "‘Will the Real Niklas Luhmann Stand up, Please’. A Reply to John Mingers." Sociological Review 51, no. 2 (May 2003): 276–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.00419.

Full text
Abstract:
This article is a critical response to John Minger's recently published piece ‘Can social systems be autopoietic?’. It draws attention to instances in this piece where Mingers has misconstrued Luhmann's theory – especially in the central concepts of openness and closure, system-environment relation, interaction, and functionality, but also in the interpretation of the role which Luhmann ascribes to the political system – and it attempts to give a more accurate analysis of these terms, and of their place in Luhmann's overall sociology. The article also asserts, more generally, that to criticize Luhmann from the perspective of action-centred theory, as Mingers has done, fails to reflect on and integrate Luhmann's direct challenge to perspectives of this kind. The article concludes with the argument that legitimate criticism of Luhmann should set out a more immanent account of his sociology, and should not simply have recourse to the more traditional sociological perspectives, which Luhmann has already effectively called into question.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Overwijk, Jan. "Autopoietic System." Philosophy Today 63, no. 4 (2019): 1125–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2020128315.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay presents, first, a description of Niklas Luhmann’s notion of autopoietic system. Luhmann theorises society as a self-referential, differential, and posthuman communication system that constitutes meaning. Then, second, it defends Luhmann against the new materialist challenge that stresses the role of matter in meaning-making.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Schwartz, Germano, and Douglas Ribeiro. "TEORIA DOS SISTEMAS AUTOPOIÉTICOS E CONSTITUIÇÃO: LUHMANN E O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL - DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5216/rfd.v41i3.43066." Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG 41, no. 3 (December 28, 2017): 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.5216/rfd.v41i3.43066.

Full text
Abstract:
Resumo: No Direito brasileiro, o Supremo Tribunal Federal é o guardião da Constituição. Ao verificar citações à teoria de Luhmann em suas decisões, viabiliza-se uma observação sobre a observação do Supremo Tribunal Federal sobre a observação de Luhmann, principalmente sobre aspectos constitucionais. Nesse contexto, o presente artigo pretende analisar como a teoria de Niklas Luhmann foi mencionada em decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal, demonstrando os erros, insuficiências ou mesmo falta de clareza na interpretação, com vistas a aclarar certas tendências equivocadas e, igualmente, explicitar pontos importantes da teoria dos sistemas sociais autopoiéticos.Abstract: In the brazilian law, the Supreme Federal Court is the guardian of Brazil’s Constitution. By verifying Luhmann’s theory quotes in their decisions it allows an observation on Supreme Federal Court’s observation on Luhmann’s observation, mainly on constitutional issues. In this context, the present article intends to analyze how Niklas Luhmann’s theory was mentioned in decisions of the Supreme Federal Court, showing the errors, incompleteness or even lack of clarity on the interpretation in order to clarify important points of the theory of autopoietic social systems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Moro, Giuseppe. "Le convergenze parallele. Il confronto di Achille Ardigň con la sociologia di Niklas Luhmann." SALUTE E SOCIETÀ, no. 2 (September 2009): 99–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/ses2009-su2006.

Full text
Abstract:
- This article presents some moments of the dialogue of Achille Ardigň with the thought of Niklas Luhmann. Ardigň shares Luhmann's care about government crisis of post-modern societies, his opinions about irreducibility of subjective sense to systemic sense and his criticism against Parsons's integrational approach. On the contrary, the sociology of Ardigň deeply differentiates from Luhmann's on three topics: the reference to empirical world for explaining and to criticizing it, the transcendence of value criteria with respect to social systems, the research of a renewed transaction between social systems and persons.Keywords: Ardigň, Luhmann, consensus, government, transaction, empathy.Parole chiave: Ardigň, Luhmann, consenso, governabilitÀ, transazione, empatia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lukas, Ernst. "Programmiertes Entscheiden: Begriffsgeschichtliche Anmerkungen." Soziale Systeme 26, no. 1-2 (November 1, 2022): 240–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2021-0009.

Full text
Abstract:
Zusammenfassung Das begriffliche Instrumentarium von Herbert A. Simon und Niklas Luhmann zu Entscheidungsprämissen und Entscheidungsprogrammen wird vergleichend untersucht. Luhmann bezieht sich zwar explizit auf Simon, durch eine unterschiedliche Theorieanlage entsteht aber eine Sinnverschiebung. Simons Theoriebildung ist auf eine empirische Analyse menschlichen Verhaltens angelegt und verfolgt das ambitionierte softwaretechnische Projekt der Modellierung von Heuristiken in einem „General Problem Solver.“ Luhmanns Theoriekonstruktion ist dagegen am Vorbild juristischen Entscheidens orientiert. Gerade dadurch gelingt es ihm aber, eine neue soziologische Perspektive auf Entscheidungen in Organisationen zu eröffnen, die für aktuelle Diskussionen zum „automated decision making“ genutzt werden kann.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bechmann, Gotthard, and Nico Stehr. "Niklas Luhmann." Információs Társadalom 2, no. 4 (December 1, 2002): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.22503/inftars.ii.2002.4.2.

Full text
Abstract:
Niklas Luhmannt 1968-ban nevezték ki szociológia professzornak az újonnan megalapított Bielefeldi Egyetemen. Megkérdezték tőle, milyen témán kíván majd dolgozni. Így válaszolt: “A modern társadalom elméletén. Időtartam 30 év, költség nincs.” Ezek után pontosan ezt az elméleti programot valósította meg. 1998 decemberében bekövetkezett haláláig, 70 éves koráig több mint 14.000 nyomtatott oldalnyi munkát publikált.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Solé, Carlota, and Josep Pont. "Niklas Luhmann." Papers. Revista de Sociologia 57 (January 1, 1999): 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.1971.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Bechmann, Gotthard, and Nico Stehr. "Niklas Luhmann." Tempo Social 13, no. 2 (November 2001): 185–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-20702001000200010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Thornhill, Chris. "NIKLAS LUHMANN." Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 7, no. 2 (January 2006): 33–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2006.9672928.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Rasch, William. "Niklas Luhmann." New German Critique 44, no. 3 132 (October 25, 2017): 189–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-4162310.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Fuchs, Stephan. "Niklas Luhmann." Sociological Theory 17, no. 1 (March 1999): 117–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00069.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Arnoldi, Jakob. "Niklas Luhmann." Theory, Culture & Society 18, no. 1 (February 2001): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051607.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Fuchs, Stephan. "Niklas Luhmann." Sociological Theory 17, no. 1 (March 1999): 117–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073527519901700108.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Sevastov, Kirill V. "Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems: the postmodern character of society’s descriptors." Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, no. 4 (December 5, 2022): 42–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2022-4-42-47.

Full text
Abstract:
The article carried out a comparative analysis of the basic provisions of the theory of social systems by N. Luhmann and the principles of the philosophy of postmodernism. Considering the categorical apparatus of N. Luhmann’s concept, the author finds points of semantic intersection with a number of key concepts of modern social philosophy, as well as mutual resonation of basic principles. The article proves that the comparison of the theory of social systems by N. Luhmann and the philosophy of postmodernism can be carried out according to several criteria: subjective (general scope of research), historical (common time and context of occurrence) and meaningful (when the perspective of consideration is shifted, it becomes possible to identify semantic parallels named theories). Thus, the article draws a parallel between N. Luhmann’s subjectless sociology and the postmodern concept of the absent subject. In accordance with the theory of social systems by N. Luhmann, the subject is non-communicative by definition. In the conceptual apparatus of the philosophy of postmodernism, a meaningfully similar rejection of the interpretation of the subject in its classical sense is fundamental. A meaningful connection between the concept of binary truth by N. Luhmann, on the one hand, and the subjectivist theory of truth in postmodernism, on the other hand, is revealed. Thus, the truth in the context of N. Luhmann’s social system depends on its relevance for the individual, fitting into the system of knowledge that is significant for him at the moment, the truth is modeled in a non-static context and can be re-evaluated in a subjective way, depending on the shift in the focus of the relevance of one or another fragment of knowledge of the individual. Similarly, in postmodern philosophy there is a subjectivisation of truth, which turns out to be a variable not only in the socio-cultural frame of reference, but also in the frame of reference of the individual. Thus, the article proves that there are semantic parallels in the theory of social systems of N. Luhmann and postmodern philosophy, which allow us to say that, independently of each other, N. Luhmann, on the one hand, and postmodern authors, on the other, develop a new vision of cognitive processes within the post-non-classical type of rationality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Lukas, Ernst. "Die Praxis der Theorie: Niklas Luhmann als Politikberater." Leviathan 50, no. 1 (2022): 29–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0340-0425-2022-1-29.

Full text
Abstract:
Luhmann ist für seine soziologische Theorie berühmt geworden. Kaum bekannt ist, dass er auch ein durchaus praxisorientierter, in Politik und Verwaltung gut vernetzter Berater war. In einer historischen Skizze zu Projekten der Verwaltungsreform der Jahre 1968-1973 wird dies anhand archivalischer Quellen und bisher weithin unbekannter beziehungsweise unveröffentlichter Texte Luhmanns gezeigt. Seine Politikberatung versteht er durchaus im Sinne einer praktischen Anwendung von Theorie, aber nicht als wissenschaftlichen Input in Politik, sondern als Element einer Intervention in Organisation, Verfahren und Taktik politischer Vorhaben.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Alvear, Rafael. "Niklas Luhmanns Neubegründung der Soziologie oder der unerschöpfliche Narzissmus der Theorie." Sociologia Internationalis 56, no. 1 (January 1, 2018): 83–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/sint.56.1.83.

Full text
Abstract:
Zu Beginn der 1980er Jahre kündigt Niklas Luhmann einen Paradigmenwechsel der Systemtheorie an, der sein ganzes Werk prägt und dem Autor zufolge erhebliche Konsequenzen für die Soziologie enthält. In Soziale Systeme. Grun‍driß einer allgemeinen Theorie werden die wichtigsten Ziegelsteine einer neuen soziologischen Architektur dargestellt, die die Soziologie von ihrer Unsicherheit und Instabilität endlich wegführen soll. Dabei handelt es sich um nichts anderes als um eine Neubegründung der Soziologie; eine Disziplin, die Luhmann zufolge in einer Theoriekrise steckt und dementsprechend durch ihre neue Grundlegung umorientiert werden muss. Der Anspruch Luhmanns auf eine Neubegründung der Soziologie manifestiert sich in seiner Forderung nach einem radikalen Bruch mit der Tradition, deren Beschreibungspotential erschöpft sei. Ist aber Luhmann imstande, mit der soziologischen Klassik zu brechen, um dann die Soziologie neu zu begründen? Um diese leitende Fragestellung zu beantworten, wird sowohl der begriffliche Apparat seiner Systemtheorie als auch ihr internes Streben nach einer neuen Grundlegung der Disziplin als Ganzes analysiert. Am Ende wird es möglich sein, von einem soziologisch allgemeinen Gestus zu reden, der die Luhmannsche Theorie auf den Weg der Kontinuität innerhalb der Soziologiegeschichte setzt.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Schecter, Stephen. "The Turn Toward Luhmann: Niklas Luhmann, Love: A Sketch; Christian Borch, Niklas Luhmann." Canadian Journal of Sociology 36, no. 4 (December 21, 2011): 388–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/cjs11883.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Handayani, Difha Sulistyawati. "Peranan Komunikasi Dalam Sistem Sosial : Analisis Teori Niklas Lukman." JKOMDIS : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Media Sosial 4, no. 2 (June 6, 2024): 417–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.47233/jkomdis.v4i2.1682.

Full text
Abstract:
The theory of communication as autopoiesis proposed by Niklas Luhmann offers a revolutionary perspective in understanding communication in social systems. Luhmann argues that communication is not just a tool for exchanging information, but is an independent process and has autonomous mechanisms to maintain and reproduce itself. This theory combines the concept of autopoiesis which originally came from biology, where a system can produce and maintain its own components through internal interactions. In Luhmann's theory, communication is seen as a basic element of a social system that has the ability to create and reproduce social structures through processes communication itself. Luhmann emphasized that communication occurs through three main elements: information, message, and understanding. This process not only transmits information, but also shapes and constructs social reality. Communication in Luhmann's view is a selective process that involves selecting the information to be communicated, the way the information is conveyed, and how the information is understood by the recipient. Apart from that, the theory of communication as autopoiesis is relevant in the context of modern communication which is increasingly complex and fragmented. In the digital era, where information spreads rapidly and in large quantities, understanding communication as an autopoietic process helps us understand how information is processed, selected, and internalized in social systems. It also helps in understanding the challenges and opportunities that have arisen from developments in communication technologies, such as social media and the internet, which have changed the way we communicate and interact with each other. Overall, Niklas Luhmann's theory of communication as autopoiesis provides a powerful theoretical framework for understanding communication as an independent and dynamic process in social systems. This theory not only provides insight into how communication functions in a social context, but also offers analytical tools for exploring the complexity and dynamics of communication in modern society. By understanding communication through the lens of autopoiesis, we can better capture the essence of the communication process and how it shapes our social reality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Schmidt, Johannes F. K. "Zettels Albtraum. Kleine Aufklärung über eine Verlustlegende." Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte 17, no. 3 (2023): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/1863-8937-2023-3-5.

Full text
Abstract:
Niklas Luhmanns Zettelkasten war lange eine sagenumwobene Gestalt. 2003 raunte der Spiegel von dem «Gral von Bielefeld», nach dem man sich (nach dem Tod des Meisters) auf die «Suche» machen müsse – nur um sich dann in der Universität Bielefeld vor einer verschlossenen Stahltür und nichts sagenden Türhütern wiederzufinden. Schon zu Luhmanns Lebzeiten, als der Kasten noch in seinem Haus in Oerlinghausen stand, ist der Kasten ein Objekt der Begierde. An dessen Mystifikation ist der Vielschreiber Luhmann selbst nicht ganz unbeteiligt, indem er in Interviews Sätze streut wie: «Meine Produktivität ist im wesentlichen aus dem Zettelkasten-System zu erklären» oder: «Der Zettelkasten kostet mich mehr Zeit als das Bücherschreiben.»
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Rodrigues, Léo Peixoto. "Notas epistemológicas: Niklas Luhmann e a tradição sociológica." Século XXI – Revista de Ciências Sociais 2, no. 1 (September 3, 2012): 108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/223667256386.

Full text
Abstract:
A partir de um breve relato sobre as abordagens teóricas clássicas, tais como as de Émile Durkheim: positivista-funcionalista; de Max Weber: interpretativista; de Karl Marx: o materialismo histórico dialético; além da proposta estruturalista francesa, o presente artigo tem por objetivo pontuar, de modo mais ou menos comparativo, a proposta teórico-epistemológica de Niklas Luhmann, considerando categorias conceituais como: sujeito/objeto, ciência/ ideologia, normatividade, ontologia, teleologia. Nesse sentido, busca-se destacar aspectos da proposta teórico-epistemológica Luhman- niana e algumas das suas implicações com relação às abordagens te- óricas que fazem parte da tradição do conhecimento sociológico. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/6386
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

CAN, Betül. "EPİSTEMOLOJİK VE METODOLOJİK BAĞLAMDA NİKLAS LUHMANN’IN SİSTEM TEORİSİ VE ANA ARGÜMANLARI." Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi 10, no. 32 (September 25, 2022): 387–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.33692/avrasyad.1176871.

Full text
Abstract:
Sistem teorisi 21. Yüzyılın karmaşık toplumlarını açıklamak bağlamında sistem filozofu olarak değerlendirilen Alman düşünür Niklas Luhmann tarafından 30 yıllık yoğun bir çalışmanın sonucunda geliştirilmiştir. Bu teori, mevcut sosyolojik gelenekteki bilimsel kabileciliğe meydan okur bir tarzda farklı disiplinlerden yararlanarak interdisipliner bir perspektifle inşa edilmiştir. Karmaşık toplumlar ancak karmaşık teorilerle açıklanabilir varsayımından hareketle mevcut kavramlar yapısökümüne uğratılmış ve bu kavramlara teorinin ontolojisine ve epistemolojisine uygun yeni anlamlar yüklenerek sosyoloji camiasına sunulmuştur. Teorinin mimarı Luhmann’a göre dünya tek bir toplumdur. Sistem teorisi de bu toplumu sistemik bir çerçevede açıklayacak bir süperteori olma iddiasındadır. Sadece bu tek dünya toplumunu değil aynı zamanda modern toplumun alt sistemleri olan hukuk, din, siyaset, eğitim, aile, sanat gibi kurumları da aynı teori perspektifinden açıklama yetkinliğine sahiptir. Söz konusu bu çalışmada sistem teorisinin oluşumunda etkili olan interdisipliner fikirlere değinilmiş olup mevcut sosyolojide tespit edilen problemler ve bu problemlere nasıl çözümler üretildiği üzerinde durulmuştur. Müteakiben teorinin genel argümanları sistematik bir perspektifle ele alınmıştır. Bu çalışma dökümantasyon yöntemiyle Niklas Luhmann’ın kendi yazdığı birincil kaynaklar ve onun üzerine yazılan ikincil kaynaklar kullanarak gerçekleştirilen betimsel bir çalışmadır. Luhmanyan bir perspektifle belirtmek gerekirse bu çalışmanın amacı Luhmann’ın sistem teorisini ikincil gözlem düzeyinde gözlemlemektir. Makalenin sistem teorisi hakkında oldukça az sayıda çalışma bulunan Türk alanyazınına katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Stichweh, Rudolf. "Moral im Grand Hotel Imperial. Dubrovnik, April 1976." Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte 17, no. 3 (2023): 35–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/1863-8937-2023-3-35.

Full text
Abstract:
In den ersten Wochen des Jahres 1976 fiel uns Studenten in den Lehrveranstaltungen Niklas Luhmanns ein Prospekt in die Hand, der für den April desselben Jahres ein dreiwöchiges Seminar zu «Ethik und Gesellschaftstheorie» am Inter-University Center for Postgraduate Studies in Dubrovnik ankündigte. Zu den dort genannten Dozenten des Seminars gehörten Jürgen Habermas und «Niklas Luhman(n)», Friedrich Kambartel, Albrecht Wellmer, Karl-Otto Apel, Iring Fetscher und Frieder Naschold, außerdem eine Reihe jugoslawischer Philosophen und Soziologen, meist mit der Universität Zagreb verbunden und ausnahmslos Mitglieder des Kreises um die Zeitschrift Praxis (Abb. 1).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Rehberg, Karl-Siegbert. "Der Weltbuchhalter." Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte 17, no. 3 (2023): 25–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/1863-8937-2023-3-25.

Full text
Abstract:
Merkwürdigerweise habe ich den bedeutendsten und auch international wirksamen Soziologen der Bundesrepublik, nämlich Niklas Luhmann, bei einem frühen öffentlichen Auftritt erlebt und viel später den letzten Vortrag des von seiner schweren Erkrankung schon gezeichneten Theoretikers vor großem Publikum sogar organisiert.Im ersten Fall handelte es sich um Luhmanns Vortrag Moderne Systemtheorien als Form gesamtgesellschaftlicher Analyse im Rahmen des in Frankfurt am Main stattfindenden 16.Deutschen Soziologentages, der vom 8.–10. April 1968 ein Fachtreffen war, in dem die Impulse der symbolisch mit der Zeitmarke «1968» umschriebenen Studentenbewegung zu vielfältigen Irritationen des akademischen Establishments führten.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Valentinov, Vladislav. "Wiener and Luhmann on feedback: from complexity to sustainability." Kybernetes 46, no. 3 (March 6, 2017): 386–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/k-11-2016-0317.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose The rise of the general systems theory in the twentieth century would not have been possible without the concept of feedback. Of special interest to the present paper is Niklas Luhmann’s reconstruction and critique of Wiener’s cybernetic approach to the feedback concept. Luhmann has suggested that the operation of the feedback-controlled systems potentially poses problems of sustainability. The purpose of this paper is to explore this suggestion in more detail. Design/methodology/approach The reconstruction of the arguments of Luhmann and Wiener shows that both scholars approached the feedback concept from the “system-environment” perspective. Luhmann takes system-environment relations to be inherently precarious. Wiener underscores the importance of the sensitivity of the feedback-controlled systems to their environment. Findings Drawing on Norbert Wiener’s and Niklas Luhmann’s ideas, the paper shows that every specification of the feedback mechanism implies the drawing of the moral boundary that demarcates those parts of the environment to which the relevant system is sensitive from those to which it is not. A likely outcome of this boundary drawing is the maintenance of intra-systemic complexity at the cost of the deteriorating sustainability of the system in its environment. Originality/value Until today, the general system theory has sought to explain organized complexity and rightly underscored the role of feedback in maintaining it, thereby inadvertently creating the chasm between the complexity and sustainability dimensions of human civilization. The present paper pleads for reorienting of the systems-theoretic analysis of the feedback concept toward closing this chasm.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Bornhausen, Stéphane. "Niklas Luhmann (1927-1998)." Hermès 23-24, no. 1 (1999): 347. http://dx.doi.org/10.4267/2042/14755.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Schäfers, Bernhard. "Soziologische Aufklärung: Niklas Luhmann." GWP – Gesellschaft. Wirtschaft. Politik 63, no. 3 (September 15, 2014): 425–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3224/gwp.v63i3.16715.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Boldyrev, Ivan. "Niklas Luhmann and Economics." Journal of Economic Sociology 12, no. 1 (2011): 25–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2011-1-25-42.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Urbánek, Eduard. "Niklas Luhmann: Soziologische Aufklärung." AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA 1973, no. 2 (January 15, 2018): 128–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2018.142.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Steinacher, Werner. "Niklas Luhmann Short cuts." perspektive mediation 3, no. 1 (2006): 50. http://dx.doi.org/10.33196/pm200601005001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Preger, Guilherme. "democracia segundo Niklas Luhmann." Logeion: Filosofia da Informação 10 (November 30, 2023): 529–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2023v10nesp2.p529-541.

Full text
Abstract:
Este artigo apresenta a concepção de democracia adotada pela Teoria dos Sistemas Sociais na versão de Niklas Luhmann. Embora seja um tema pouco frequente na obra do sociólogo, ela foi exposta com clareza no artigo The Future of Democracy, publicado em 1990. Neste artigo, a concepção é apresentada como uma hipótese histórica que foi capaz de prever e explicar algumas características da democracia ocidental após a queda do bloco soviético. O artigo avança um desenvolvimento dessa concepção democrática para entender melhor o ressurgimento dos movimentos políticos de extrema-direita na última década e, por outro lado, mostrar como tais movimentos são incompatíveis com o princípio democrático proposto pela teoria luhmanniana.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Eum, Soun-young. "The Recognition Method of N. Luhmann and His Sociology of Law." Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (January 31, 2018): 141–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.35223/gnulaw.26.1.6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Harste, Gorm. "Departementalitet eller guvernementalitet – organisationers og organisationsteoriers historiske sociologi." Dansk Sociologi 21, no. 4 (December 22, 2010): 27–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.22439/dansoc.v21i4.3409.

Full text
Abstract:
Artiklen undersøger de selvbeskrivelser, der er blevet fremsat i forsøgene på at organisere organisation lige siden 1000-tallet. Moderne organisationsforståelse er opstået gennem hundreder af år. Koder for organisatorisk kommunikation er blevet sammensat, udviklet og raffineret eksempelvis i konflikter om centralisering eller decentralisering i korpsånd og i bureaukrati. I tolkningen heraf anvendes Niklas Luhmanns begrebsdannelse, der udviser en anden tilgang til organisationshistorie og organisationssociologi, end den, der kendes fra Weber og Foucault. Søgeord: Organisationssociologi, Foucault, Luhmann, historisk sociologi. ENGELSK ABSTRACT: Gorm Harste: Departmentality or Governmentality – the Historical Sociology of Organisations and Organisation Theory History of organisations probably goes back to the 11th century. The long story of their development has been told by Max Weber and Michel Foucault. However Foucault did not elaborate a general organisational sociology and Weber’s story created a somewhat incomprehensible disordered complexity. Hence traditional organisational analyses trace organisation theory back a hundred years – to Weber and a few others. The present story about departmentality derives its conceptual framework not within governing or steering as Foucault does, but in the problem of delegation. The concept and theories of power were established in order to handle coordination at spatial distance. The aim of powerful concepts and theories of organisation was to establish communication in forms of simultaneous cooperation between distant operations. The article establishes this temporal conception in a historical sociology of organisation using Niklas Luhmann’s system theory. Power only empowers if centralised power is able to decentralise and abstain from forced control in favour of the activity of parts departed and detached from the whole. The parts and the members of the organ got their identity fi rst described in a conception of ”corpus spiritus”, later called ”esprit de corps” and then ”corporate spirit”. The article analyses these semantics and their developments. Key words: Luhmann, Foucault, history of organizations, historical sociology, governmentality, department.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Sidrys, Inga. "Niklaso Luhmanno autopoezės teorijos pritaikymas teisės sistemai." Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas 8, no. 3-4 (July 10, 2001): 44–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/socmintvei.2001.3-4.5896.

Full text
Abstract:
Šiame straipsnyje bandoma atsakyti į klausimą, kas yra teisė ir jos sistema, remiantis Niklaso Luhmanno, kuris yra vienas iš pagrindinių sistemų mokslo atstovų, požiūriu. Straipsnio tikslas - aptarti Luhmanno autopoezės teorijos pritaikymą teisės sistemai bei šio bandymo kritinius aspektus. Pagrindinis autopoezės reikalavimas yra tas, kad teisė turi būti įvardijama kaip autonomiška ir iš esmės savi-referentinė komunikacinė sistema. Ji nepriklauso nei nuo politinių ar ekonominių kriterijų, nei nuo tiesos, kurią perteikia mokslinis diskursas. Teisinis bendravimas yra išskirtinis. Teisės sistema yra atvira pažinimui, nes reaguoja į politiką, ekonomiką, bet ji yra ir uždara sistema, nes funkcionuoja remdamasi savo norminiais imperatyvais. Luhmanno autopoezės teorija skatina analizuoti “kaip mąsto pati teisė”. Autopoezės teorijos, kuri kildinama iš biologijos gyvųjų organizmų sistemų teorijos, taikymas teisės sistemos analizei tebėra kontroversiškas. Nors Luhmannas buvo kritikuojamas dėl savo perdėtos aistros sistemų teorijai ir empirinio tyrimo svarbos atmetimo, vis dėlto jis įvertintas dėl savo pastangų suteikti naujas mąstymo perspektyvas teisės sociologijai, sistemų mokslui, kitoms integruotoms disciplinoms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Minhoto, Laurindo Dias, Lucas Fucci Amato, and Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de Barros. "Observing observers in social systems theory.: an interview with Hans-Georg Moeller." Tempo Social 33, no. 3 (December 19, 2021): 333–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2021.182052.

Full text
Abstract:
On November 4th, 2019, Hans-Georg Moeller delivered a presentation on systems theory at the Law School of the University of São Paulo and was interviewed about Niklas Luhmann’s theory of society, with emphasis on issues such as law, politics, and the history of philosophy. Professor Moeller is the author of important books such as Luhmann explained: From souls to systems (Moeller, 2006) and The radical Luhmann (Moeller, 2011), the latter also translated to Japanese and Italian. He also works on Chinese philosophy and is currently Full Professor at the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies in the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Macau, China. Throughout the interview, professor Moeller situated Luhmann in the philosophical tradition of German idealism and presented the shift to second-order observation as a crucial aspect of contemporary society, in religion and politics, science, economy and law. The interview was conducted partly in writing and partly in the form of a recorded and transcribed debate.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Kang, Hee Won. "Das Recht als ein autopoiesisches System: Luhmann'scher Rechtsbegriff." Kyung Hee Law Journal 52, no. 2 (June 30, 2017): 195–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.15539/khlj.52.2.7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Braun, Dietmar, and Yannis Papadopoulos. "Niklas Luhmann et la gouvernance." Politix 14, no. 55 (2001): 15–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/polix.2001.1170.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Le Bouter, Flavien. "L’opinion publique selon Niklas Luhmann." Tracés, no. 29 (December 1, 2015): 159–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/traces.6357.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Ferrarrese, Estelle. "Niklas Luhmann et l'opinion publique." Cahiers internationaux de sociologie 116, no. 1 (2004): 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/cis.116.0097.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Rocha, Leonel Severo, and André Rafael Weyermüller. "COMUNICAÇÃO ECOLÓGICA POR NIKLAS LUHMANN." Novos Estudos Jurí­dicos 19, no. 1 (April 1, 2014): 232. http://dx.doi.org/10.14210/nej.v19n1.p232-262.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Halsall, Francis. "Niklas Luhmann and the Body." New Bioethics 18, no. 1 (May 2012): 4–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/2050287713z.0000000001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Sciulli, David. "An Interview with Niklas Luhmann." Theory, Culture & Society 11, no. 2 (May 1994): 37–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026327694011002003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Schmid, Josef, and Patrick Wurster. "Niklas Luhmann: Organisation und Entscheidung." Politische Vierteljahresschrift 42, no. 3 (September 2001): 518–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11615-001-0082-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Bechmann, Gotthard, and Nico Stehr. "The legacy of Niklas Luhmann." Society 39, no. 2 (January 2002): 67–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02717531.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Wehmeier, Stefan. "Niklas Luhmann: Organisation und Entscheidung." Publizistik 46, no. 1 (March 2001): 89–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11616-001-0021-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Ono, K. "Political Theory of Niklas Luhmann." Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association 53 (2002): 163–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.7218/nenpouseijigaku1953.53.0_163.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Guy, Jean-Sébastien. "Luhmann, Niklas, Trust and Power." Canadian Journal of Sociology 44, no. 1 (March 31, 2019): 127–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/cjs29553.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Niklaus Luhmann' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography