Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / New commons / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: New commons.

Journal articles on the topic 'New commons'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 23 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'New commons.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Rodgers, Christopher P. "A New Deal for Commons? Common Resource Management and the Commons Act 2006." Environmental Law Review 9, no. 1 (March 2007): 25–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/enlr.2007.9.1.25.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Henderson, Hazel. "New markets and new commons." Futures 27, no. 2 (March 1995): 113–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)00025-e.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Ruiz-Ballesteros, Esteban, and Miguel A. Gual. "The Emergence of New Commons." Human Ecology 40, no. 6 (November 17, 2012): 847–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9540-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Giuliani, Alfonso, and Carlo Vercellone. "From New Institutional Economics of the Commons to the Common as a Mode of Production." South Atlantic Quarterly 118, no. 4 (October 1, 2019): 767–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7825600.

Full text

Abstract:

The vitality of the new field of study on the commons crosses the entire field of social sciences, and it is analyzed from very different perspectives. On the one side, the Ostromian new Institutional economics uses the term commons as plural and seeks to give an account of the variety of the institutional forms of economic regulation. On the other, some new approaches interpret commons as an element of subversion of capitalism. These authors insist on the use of the concept as singular and they interpret it as a general principle of reorganization of economy and society. This article aims at analyzing the meanings of common and commons at stake in this debate. After a critical assessment of Elinor Ostrom’s contribution, the analysis will focus on the presentation of the theories of common as singular, distinguishing two currents of thought: the political conception of Dardot and Laval and the neo-workerist thesis of common as mode of production.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Vivero-Pol, Jose Luis. "Food as a new old commons." World Nutrition 10, no. 1 (April 5, 2019): 119–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.26596/wn.2019101119-137.

Full text

Abstract:

The industrial food system, which is becoming highly dominant, is increasingly failing to fulfil its basic functions: producing food in a sustainable manner, feeding people adequately and avoiding hunger. As hunger remains steadily high and obesity numbers do not cease to grow in a world that is overconsuming natural resources far beyond planetary boundaries, producing food unsustainably and wasting one third of it, there is a need to bring unconventional perspectives into the debate on possible solutions for a transition towards a fairer and sustainable food system. The dominant paradigms that have sustained human development and economic growth during the twentieth century (productivism, consumerism, individualism, survival of the fittest, the tragedy of the commons and endless growth) do not provide viable solutions to the multiple crises and the current challenges. Considering food as a commons can be an alternative paradigm worth exploring. The food commons, anchored to the adequate valuation of the multiple dimensions of food to humans, can provide a discourse of convergence that embraces contemporary (i.e. urban innovations) and customary (i.e. indigenous practices) food activities, being at the same time the aspirational vision that coalesce the different collective actions for food into a networked web that relentlessly grows to challenge and render obsolete the industrial food system that only values the economic dimension of food as a commodity, keeps food producers hungry and makes food consumers obese.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Bromley, Daniel W. "The Commons in the New Millennium." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87, no. 1 (February 2005): 265–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.720_3.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Berlinguer, Marco. "NEW COMMONS: TOWARDS A NECESSARY REAPPRAISAL." Popular Communication 18, no. 3 (June 28, 2020): 201–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1781857.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Woestenburg, Martin. "Heathland farm as a new commons?" Landscape Research 43, no. 8 (August 18, 2018): 1045–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1503236.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

De Moor, Tine, Miguel Laborda-Pemán, José Miguel Lana-Berasain, René Van Weeren, and Angus Winchester. "Ruling the Commons. Introducing a new methodology for the analysis of historical commons." International Journal of the Commons 10, no. 2 (October 18, 2016): 529. http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ijc.760.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Szeman, Imre. "Energy Commons." Minnesota review 2019, no. 93 (November 1, 2019): 94–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00265667-7737311.

Full text

Abstract:

This article argues for the necessity of articulating and struggling for an energy common. An energy common is not intended to substitute for articulations of the common in general. Rather, the specific discussion of energy in relation to the common accomplishes two things. First, it underscores the problematic lack of attention to energy in existing discussions of the common, as in autonomist political philosophy. Second, adding energy to our thinking about the common produces new insights into the political and environmental commitments of existing articulations of the common. The possibilities of a common that is alert to the limits of natural resources and operates in relation to them are described in Ivan Illich’s 1973 essay “Energy and Equity.” This article takes Illich’s essay as a beginning point for creating an energy commons today.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Cumberland, Jay. "Creating New Economies Through the Urban Commons." Tikkun 33, no. 3 (2018): 39–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/08879982-6817901.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Ellen Spencer, Mary. "Evolving a new model: the information commons." Reference Services Review 34, no. 2 (April 2006): 242–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907320610669470.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Bradbury, R. H., and R. M. Seymour. "Coral reef science and the new commons." Coral Reefs 28, no. 4 (August 23, 2009): 831–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00338-009-0540-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Noonan, Douglas S. "Charting a new cultural commons research agenda." Journal of Cultural Economics 38, no. 3 (July 6, 2013): 287–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10824-013-9207-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Arvidsson, Adam. "Capitalism and the Commons." Theory, Culture & Society 37, no. 2 (August 25, 2019): 3–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276419868838.

Full text

Abstract:

This article investigates the potential role of the commons in the future transformation of digital capitalism by comparing it to the role of the commons in the transition to capitalism. In medieval and early modern Europe the commons supported gradual social and technological innovation as well as a new civil society organized around the combination of commons-based petty production and new ideals of freedom and equality. Today the new commons generated by the global real subsumption of ordinary life processes are supporting similar forms of commons-based petty production. After positioning the new petty producers within the framework of the crisis of digital capitalism, the article concludes by extrapolating a number of hypothetical scenarios for their role in its future transformation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Brunckhorst, David J., and Phillip Coop. "Tilbuster Commons: Synergies of theory and action in new agricultural commons on private land." Ecological Management & Restoration 4, no. 1 (April 2003): 13–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00130.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Albareda, Laura, and Alejo Jose G. Sison. "Commons Organizing: Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics." Journal of Business Ethics 166, no. 4 (August 11, 2020): 727–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04580-8.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract In recent years, business ethics and economic scholars have been paying greater attention to the development of commons organizing. The latter refers to the processes by which communities of people work in common in the pursuit of the common good. In turn, this promotes commons organizational designs based on collective forms of common goods production, distribution, management and ownership. In this paper, we build on two main literature streams: (1) the ethical approach based on the theory of the common good of the firm in virtue ethics and (2) the economic approach based on the theory of institutions for collective action developed by Ostrom’s research on common-pool resources to avert the tragedy of the commons. The latter expands to include the novel concepts of new commons, “commoning” and polycentric governance. Drawing on the analysis of what is new in these forms of organizing, we propose a comprehensive model, highlighting the integration of two sets of organizing principles—common good and collective action – and five problem-solving processes to explain the main dimensions of commons organizing. We contribute to business ethics literature by exploring the convergence between the ethical and economic approaches in the development of a commons organizing view.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Storey, Colin. "Commons consent." Library Management 36, no. 8/9 (November 9, 2015): 570–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/lm-05-2014-0057.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose – Constructing academic library learning spaces involves ad hoc groups of agents often with fuzzy inter-relationships. Librarians and their user communities are initially hailed within these groups as prime-movers in realizing projects. Librarians bring to the table contagious ideas generated from their own profession in the hope of securing appropriate funding and planning pre-requisites. All other agents, be they internal community representatives or external architects, assist them in making sense of each other’s standpoints to co-create dynamic learning spaces in “commons consent”. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using the community culture in The Chinese University of Hong Kong as existed in 2012 as a case study, this paper examines the reality of this process in terms of a new library for learning, teaching and research. Findings – Can librarians hold sway over the priorities of other individual agents, particularly architects, to gain consent to build their initial concept of the commons which they are vigorously promoting as professionally valid and educationally potent? In the co-creation of a building, individual preferences and organizational power structures in ad hoc groups drawn from the university’s distinct cultural environment fuel compromise and even tension around the librarians’ and architects’ original visions. Research limitations/implications – Many other case studies of library building learning commons projects would be useful to add to these findings in sensemaking, co-creation and community cultures. Practical implications – Assists library managers in their management of large buildings projects. Originality/value – An original case study of a major Asian academic library learning commons project which involves sensemaking, co-creation and community cultures ideas imported from construction science.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Aghel, Parsa. "The Anthropocene Commons – A New Paradigm of Scale Variance: Commons Frameworks and Climate Change Theory." Oregon Undergraduate Research Journal 19, no. 1 (June 2021): 77–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/uo/ourj.19.1.5.

Full text

Abstract:

The term Anthropocene, denoting the era where human activity is the greatest influence on the environment and climate, marks a new era of climate change theory and understanding. This paper, though, looks at existing promising works surrounding the Anthropocene and argues that the dialogue lacks holistic conceptions of agency and spatial and temporal scale variance in order to fully grasp its complexity. Agency refers to the flawed understanding of the Anthropocene as simply human without consideration for other assemblages, which denotes the other stakeholders apart from humans. Temporal scale refers to the need for a varied consideration of time and the creation of assemblages. Spatial scale refers to the different levels of interaction (national, international, socioeconomic. This understanding of scales, or scale variance, relies on Derek Woods’ theory that multiple scalar levels are necessary to encapsulate the Anthropocene. This paper will approach scale variance by constructing the Anthropocene Commons model. The model, based its theoretical framework on Garrett Hardin’s Tragedy of the Commons on resource, will utilize the three levels of scale absent in other scholarship. The paper will examine other models used to address climate change and discuss their lack of the necessary scope and holistic framework and how their prescriptions for addressing climate catastrophe fall short. Using scale variance in the Anthropocene commons, then, will seek to correct it and offer a standardized but flexible framework to better address the ongoing and impending crisis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Means, Alexander J. "Educational commons and the new radical democratic imaginary." Critical Studies in Education 55, no. 2 (April 4, 2014): 122–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.903502.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Mavin, Sharon, Philip Wilding, Brenda Stalker, David Simmonds, Chris Rees, and Francine Winch. "Developing “new commons” between HRD research and practice." Journal of European Industrial Training 31, no. 1 (January 30, 2007): 4–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090590710721709.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Junge, Benjamin. "Another commons is possible." Focaal 2010, no. 57 (June 1, 2010): 115–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2010.570110.

Full text

Abstract:

Donald M. Nonini, ed., The global idea of “the commons.”New York: Berghahn Books, 2007, 138 pp., ISBN: 1-845-45485-5.Jeffrey Juris, Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008, 400 pp., ISBN: 0822342693.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

McCormack, Fiona. "Māori Saltwater Commons." Commoning Ethnography 1, no. 1 (December 15, 2018): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/ce.v1i1.5203.

Full text

Abstract:

This article draws on Māori claims to fisheries in Aotearoa New Zealand as well as their opposition to the establishment of a large scale marine protected area, to question whether commoning, as a conceptual frame, can account for indigenous resistances in ocean environments. It argues that the theorisation of horizontal collective activism, an emphasis on a politics of relationality encompassing humans and non-humans and the potential for transformative practice in commonings, is congruent with the indigenous sociality mobilised by Māori in relation to their seascapes. As an analytical tool, however, commoning pays inadequate attention to inegalitarianism. Inequality may amplify, for instance, in the process of claiming indigenous rights, or it may otherwise be reconfigured as it articulates with the imperative of neoliberal environmental capitalism. Property – alienated, usurped or reappropriated – while considered a reductive representation of the commons is, at least for indigenous peoples, a crucial feature of struggles, a phenomenon clearly articulated in Māori claims to fisheries and marine spaces.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Jecker, Nancy S., and Albert R. Jonsen. "Healthcare as a Commons." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4, no. 2 (1995): 207–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180100005909.

Full text

Abstract:

In September 1994, the New York Times carried a front page article declaring healthcare reform dead in Congress. The obituary on healthcare followed a Congressional decision not to pursue the issue further in 1994. Although Congress and the President will likely revisit healthcare reform during 1995, the choices may be between various incremental steps, rather than substantive changes to bring about universal coverage.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Ostrom, Elinor. "Reformulating the commons." Ambiente & Sociedade, no. 10 (June 2002): 5–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1414-753x2002000100002.

Full text

Abstract:

The western hemisphere is richly endowed with a diversity of natural resource systems that are governed by complex local and national institutional arrangements that have not, until recently, been well understood. While many local communities that possess a high degree of autonomy to govern local resources have been highly successful over long periods of time, others fail to take action to prevent overuse and degradation of forests, inshore fisheries, and other natural resources. The conventional theory used to predict and explain how local users will relate to resources that they share makes a uniform prediction that users themselves will be unable to extricate themselves from the tragedy of the commons. Using this theoretical view of the world, there is no variance in the performance of self-organized groups. In theory, there are no self-organized groups. Empirical evidence tells us, however, that considerable variance in performance exists and many more local users self-organize and are more successful than it is consistent with the conventional theory . Parts of a new theory are presented here.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Goggin, Gerard. "An Australian Wireless Commons?" Media International Australia 125, no. 1 (November 2007): 118–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878x0712500113.

Full text

Abstract:

In this paper, I reflect upon the Australian experience of wireless technologies and cultures, especially focusing on Wi-Fi, WiMax and broadband wireless. It is arguable that the development of these new wireless technologies has taken quite different forms in Australia than it has done in other countries. To approach this question, I consider the concept of a wireless commons and what it signifies, and look at how it could serve to open up Australian debates.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Goggin, Gerard. "An Australian Wireless Commons?" Media International Australia 125, no. 1 (November 2007): 118–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878x0812500113.

Full text

Abstract:

In this paper, 1 reflect upon the Australian experience of wireless technologies and cultures, especially focusing on Wi-Fi, WiMax and broadband wireless. It is arguable that the development of these new wireless technologies has taken quite different forms in Australia than it has done in other countries. To approach this question, I consider the concept of a wireless commons and what it signifies, and look at how it could serve to open up Australian debates.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Šestáková, Anna, and Jana Plichtová. "Contemporary commons: Sharing and managing common-pool resources in the 21st century." Human Affairs 29, no. 1 (January 28, 2019): 74–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2019-0007.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract In her groundbreaking work, Elinor Ostrom suggested that communities are able to self-organize and develop rules which allow them to effectively manage common-pool resources while avoiding the “tragedy of the commons”, as proposed by Hardin. Based on empirical case studies of how forests, irrigation, grazing land and fisheries are organized all over the world, Ostrom suggested several principles that can serve as guidelines for managing common-pool resources. In the 21st century new initiatives have been based on sharing. There are various examples such as car and bike sharing in cities, internet platforms such as Wikipedia, community gardens and many others. There is a reason to believe that these efforts will continue to grow and become more popular as people realise the economic, social and ecological benefits. The aim of this paper is to analyse to what extent Ostrom’s findings are relevant to these new, often urbanised or digitalised forms of sharing. Can the famous design principles for which she won the Nobel prize be applied or do we need to search for a different set of principles that are more suitable for these new emerging forms of ‘the commons’? Our findings suggest that although Ostrom’s framework needs to be adapted before being applied to the reality of urban and digitalised environments, some of her findings remain relevant.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Bauwens, Michel. "Corona and the commons." P2P E INOVAÇÃO 7 (September 26, 2020): 26–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21721/p2p.2020v7n1.p26-31.

Full text

Abstract:

The article addresses an important stage that the pandemic brought to the transition of the transition from the “old” to the “new” ways of organising Society. Points to an attitude emerging from changes. The Corona crisis, despite weaknesses and errors, has shown what can be done and how quickly institutions can adapt and change their choices, since life is at stake and, therefore, its legitimacy. This process towards ‘partner state’ practices and public-commons protocols will not be automatic, and will be an alternative to a coercive and authoritarian state-centric model, which could be one of the negative outcomes of this crisis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Jakobsson, Peter, and Fredrik Stiernstedt. "Reinforcing Property by Strengthening the Commons: A New Media Policy Paradigm?" tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 10, no. 1 (January 30, 2012): 49–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i1.314.

Full text

Abstract:

In much scholarly writing and in many leftist and activist accounts the enclosures of the cultural commons have been fiercely critiqued. However, during the last years, new media business models, that challenge the notion of the cultural industries as “copyright industries”, has been taking shape. A new class of entrepreneurs is instead working to expand the commons as part of their businesses. Accordingly, representatives from these new media industries, policy makers, and politicians have joined the academic and political critique of the “enclosures of the cultural common”. The paper argues that this is a shift within the dominant media policy paradigm and an attempt to integrate existing practices on the Internet, based on cooperation and sharing, into the market. By relocating the struggle from “intellectual property” to “platform economics”, the media industry can exploit the productivity of the commons while holding on to the power that comes with ownership and property.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Jakobsson, Peter, and Fredrik Stiernstedt. "Reinforcing Property by Strengthening the Commons: A New Media Policy Paradigm?" tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 10, no. 1 (January 30, 2012): 49–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/vol10iss1pp49-55.

Full text

Abstract:

In much scholarly writing and in many leftist and activist accounts the enclosures of the cultural commons have been fiercely critiqued. However, during the last years, new media business models, that challenge the notion of the cultural industries as “copyright industries”, has been taking shape. A new class of entrepreneurs is instead working to expand the commons as part of their businesses. Accordingly, representatives from these new media industries, policy makers, and politicians have joined the academic and political critique of the “enclosures of the cultural common”. The paper argues that this is a shift within the dominant media policy paradigm and an attempt to integrate existing practices on the Internet, based on cooperation and sharing, into the market. By relocating the struggle from “intellectual property” to “platform economics”, the media industry can exploit the productivity of the commons while holding on to the power that comes with ownership and property.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Bollig, Michael, and Carolyn Lesorogol. "The “new pastoral commons” of Eastern and Southern Africa." International Journal of the Commons 10, no. 2 (September 23, 2016): 665. http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ijc.771.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Wood, Randy. "Religion in the Public Schools: Negotiating the New Commons." Journal of Church and State 57, no. 3 (July 14, 2015): 580–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csv038.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Daniels, William, Colin Darch, and Karin de Jager. "The Research Commons: a new creature in the library?" Performance Measurement and Metrics 11, no. 2 (July 6, 2010): 116–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14678041011064043.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Stevenson, Nick. "Post-citizenship, the New Left and the democratic commons." Citizenship Studies 19, no. 6-7 (August 18, 2015): 591–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1053796.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Teurlings, Jan. "Social Media and the New Commons of TV Criticism." Television & New Media 19, no. 3 (May 28, 2017): 208–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1527476417709599.

Full text

Abstract:

This article investigates the way that social media have given a renewed impetus to TV criticism. Websites like Entertainment Weekly or TVline.com not only offer TV criticism by TV critics but also offer ample opportunity for fans to debate their favorite TV shows, part of what Graeme Turner has called “the demotic turn” in contemporary media. Whereas academic scrutiny of this demotic turn has tended to focus on the issue of democratization and the valorization of subjugated knowledges, relatively little attention has been given to how this has created a “commonification” of TV criticism. An analysis of audience reactions to The Walking Dead shows a protoprofessionalization of TV criticism, with audience members offering increasingly sophisticated analyses of TV shows, informed by standards set by the culture industry. The paper ends with a discussion on what type of cultural knowledge these new televisual commons produce and circulate.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Kaufman, A. "The Health Commons and Care of New Mexico's Uninsured." Annals of Family Medicine 4, suppl_1 (September 1, 2006): S22—S27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.539.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

De Angelis, Massimo. "The New Commons in Practice: Strategy, process and alternatives." Development 48, no. 2 (June 2005): 48–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100141.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Daloz, Laurent A. Parks, Cheryl H. Keen, James P. Keen, and Sharon Daloz Parks. "LivesofCommitmentHigher Education in the Life of the New Commons." Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 28, no. 3 (May 1996): 10–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1996.10544263.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Adger, W. N. "The Commons in the New Millennium: Challenges and Adaptations." Environmental Science & Policy 7, no. 3 (June 2004): 237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.01.004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Poenar, Horea. "Bad New World. The (Relative) Rebirth of the Commons." Caietele Echinox 32 (June 20, 2017): 64–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/cechinox.2017.32.05.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Rappaport, Nina. "The New Industrial Commons: Worker‐Owners and Factory Space." Architectural Design 91, no. 5 (September 2021): 48–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ad.2731.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Guttmann, Alexandre. "Commons and cooperatives: A new governance of collective action." Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 92, no. 1 (September 12, 2020): 33–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apce.12291.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Merino Calle, Irene. "Patrimonio cultural inmaterial y bienes comunes. ¿Nuevos derechos de propiedad intelectual?" Derecho Global. Estudios sobre Derecho y Justicia, no. 12 (July 1, 2019): 41–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.32870/dgedj.v0i12.237.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Meyer, Camille. "Social finance and the commons paradigm." Management Decision 58, no. 4 (September 13, 2019): 786–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/md-01-2019-0133.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose The concept of the commons, or common goods, is becoming increasingly widespread in the world of research and among civil society. The commons are defined as resources that are shared and collectively managed by communities of users, such as natural commons (e.g. fisheries, the climate) and knowledge commons (e.g. Wikipedia, open-source software). The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents the findings of the PhD dissertation “Social finance and the commons,” recipient of the 2017 Emerald/EFMD Outstanding Doctoral Research Award, category Management and Governance, sponsored by Management Decision. Adopting an interdisciplinary perspective of the commons, this dissertation investigates how community enterprises govern financial resources as commons to serve the common good. To do so, it builds on data collected on community development banks in Brazil and complementary currencies in multiple countries. Findings The findings explain how collective action favors the implementation of new forms of governance and management potentially enabling finance to create and support communities. In doing so, this dissertation provides insights on the transformative power of some governance features for the creation of commons. Originality/value This dissertation advances theoretical and conceptual foundations for a theory of the commons in management sciences. It contributes to a new conceptualization of the commons, especially by extending the concept of commons to finance and showing the variety of commons according to governance structures and values. It also generates theoretical insights into social and community entrepreneurship research through an in-depth investigation of social finance organizations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Brown, Katrina Myrvang. "New challenges for old commons: The role of historical common land in contemporary rural spaces." Scottish Geographical Journal 122, no. 2 (June 2006): 109–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00369220600917412.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Lohmann, Roger A. "The Ostroms’ Commons Revisited." Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 45, no. 4_suppl (July 9, 2016): 27–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764016643613.

Full text

Abstract:

Elinor and Vincent Ostrom spent their careers working in fields outside third-sector studies, yet a significant body of their work has important implications for nonprofit organizations and the wider third sector. From their academic base at the Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University, they built a large body of research and theory on a broad range of topics that bear on nonprofit and voluntary action theory, including self-governance, collaboration, coproduction, polycentrism, federalism, and numerous others. This article examines and critiques selected aspects of their role in the vast international network of commons studies and projects, including a body of my own work stretching back several decades on the commons theory of voluntary action (CTVA). Recent work on new commons, information commons, and knowledge commons points toward a convergence of the Ostrom’s work on commons with commons research and theory in our field.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Federici, Silvia. "Women, Reproduction, and the Commons." South Atlantic Quarterly 118, no. 4 (October 1, 2019): 711–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7825564.

Full text

Abstract:

The Common/s as a principle of social organization is at the center of radical political debates as an alternative to the logic of capital and the market. In her essay Silvia Federici presents a feminist perspective on the politics of the commons, with special attention to the reproductive commons women are constructing in response to the displacements caused by the new expansion of capitalist relations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Wen, Shuangge, and Jingchen Zhao. "The Commons, the Common Good and Extraterritoriality: Seeking Sustainable Global Justice through Corporate Responsibility." Sustainability 12, no. 22 (November 14, 2020): 9475. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229475.

Full text

Abstract:

Despite their laudable intent, extraterritorial legal initiatives to promote corporate sustainability development have not been well received in practice, and are often seen as a window-dressing exercise. This article aims to conduct a conceptual and doctrinal analysis, offering a theoretical foundation that interprets corporate extraterritorial legislative attempts as legitimate in the context of globalisation, using the lens of “the commons” and “the common good”. We try to link the values and dimensions of “the commons” to the goals of corporate extraterritorial legislation, so that lawmaking attempts with extraterritorial reach will gain additional foundational support and achieve more effective and better controlled compliance. In particular, the article makes an original attempt to justify and develop a new notion, namely “the extraterritorial commons”. This notion is in harmony with, rather than contradicting, progressive legal attempts to address the mismatching and conflicting nature of the relationship between the traditional voluntarism of corporate extraterritorial responsibilities, particularly in relation to sustainability issues, and global trends towards more regulation in this area.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Miller, Michelle Ann. "B/ordering the environmental commons." Progress in Human Geography 44, no. 3 (March 19, 2019): 473–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132519837814.

Full text

Abstract:

Transboundary environmental commons are usually conceived in terms of the spatial arrangements that govern transboundary resources and coordinate responses to cross-border environmental threats and crises. Borders in this context tend to be viewed as relatively stable institutions in the administration of geographically dispersed resources with well-defined properties by a jurisdictionally divided collective of users. In practice, however, the transboundary commons defy such clear spatial resolution. This paper contributes to emerging scholarship on the transboundary commons by showing how processes of commoning and b/ordering are continually changing in relation to each other to generate flexible new geographies of conservation practice.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!