Relevant bibliographies by topics / Neolithic period

Academic literature on the topic 'Neolithic period'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 31 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Neolithic period.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Neolithic period"

1

Šikanjić, Petra Rajić, Zrinka Premužić, and Maja Krznarić Škrivanko. "Rib anomalies in a Neolithic period skeleton from Croatia." Anthropologischer Anzeiger 74, no. 2 (July 1, 2017): 123–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/2017/0631.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Brigić, Dženan. "Gornja Tuzla – prahistorijsko naselje sjeveroistočne Bosne / Gornja Tuzla - Prehistoric settlement of Northeastern Bosnia." Journal of BATHINVS Association ACTA ILLYRICA / Godišnjak Udruženja BATHINVS ACTA ILLYRICA Online ISSN 2744-1318, no. 2 (December 1, 2017): 27–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.54524/2490-3930.2018.27.

Full text
Abstract:
Gornja Tuzla is located on far slopes mountain Majevica, with upper streamof river Jala, aroun 10km from todays city of Tuzla, in the direction of northeast. This is a rather devastated locality, where the most damage has been done to youngest layer. Most of settlement, whose surface Čović estimates aroun 12 i1 5ha, based on findings of pottery fragments on the ground. Even today, at the bottom of tell, one can see a many fragments of local reddsish pottery from starčevo type. Đuro Basler was the first one who determined the existance of prehistoric settlement when he found grave from iron age. Later, Benac and Čović visited Gornja Tuzla and 1955. Čović opened a first probe, and after learning that cultural layers are going deeper into the ground, he opened another probe 1956, and 1957 where he digged all the way to the sterile soil. Next year, 1958. he opened the biggest probe, probe II (1958) and in that probe he determined complete stratigrapy of neolithich settlement Gornja Tuzla. According to his analysis, VI and deepest layer belongs to Stačevo culture of middle neolithic, and younger layers to the Vinča culture, and the youngest one to eneolithic culture which proved the continuity of life. Second and last excavation has been done in the years 2008/2009 when smaller probe was opened bu the results of research have never been published. Gornja Tuzla represents one of the most important settlements in Bosnia and Hercegovinia considering that with Obre I, has the deepest layers which dates from periodo of middle neolitihic and has the key role in understanding period of transition from middle neolitihic Starčevo to young neolithic Vinča culture.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Molodin, Vyacheslav I., Lyudmila N. Mylnikova, Marina S. Nesterova, Liliya S. Kobeleva, and Dmitrii A. Nenakhov. "Baraba Culture of Early Neolithic Period." Archaeology and Ethnography 19, no. 7 (2020): 69–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-7-69-93.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose. Based on the results of the study of materials of the Tartas-1 and Ust-Tartas-1 sites and radiocarbon dating, the article explores the Baraba culture of the early Neolithic era (VII thousand BC, entering the VIII and VI thousand BC). Results. The Neolithic parking lot, studied at Tartas-1, is represented by two structures, a smokehouse and a series of pits for storing fish. A significant number of finds from bone and stone have been found. The ceramic complex is of particular importance. These are flat-bottomed containers, made in the technique of orderly patchwork, using a molding cord on the top of the vessel, and roller-flow around the perimeter of the bottom. The ornament is represented by a complex plot of an asymmetrical composition. The stone industry is characterized as plate-like with a high value of linear technology. The absence of stone arrowheads is characteristic of this. Fish was harvested in pits. At different stages of operation, corpses of different animals were placed inside. The bones of Late Pleistocene fauna have been revealed. The original ritual complex was discovered on the monument of Ust-Tartas-1. Conclusion. In Baraba, the ceramics of Tartas-1 and Ust-Tartas-1 are similar to the ceramics of Autodrome-2/2, which is related to Boborykinskaya culture, direct dating of ceramics attributed to the last quarter 6th – mid 5th thousand BC. The early Neolithic sites of the North with complexes with flat-bottomed utensils date from the end of the 7th – first half of 6th thousand BC. Neolithic flat-bottomed utensils of Western Siberia should be assessed as a phenomenon of general historical and stage nature. The classification of Tartas complexes with flat-bottomed utensils to Boborykinskaya culture is inaccurate and incorrect. The latter appears to be much younger in time. The discoveries of sites with flat-bottomed ceramics allow a completely new idea of the dynamics of historical and cultural processes in the forest and steppe of the Irtysh area.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Stiner, Mary C., Nuno F. Bicho, John Lindly, and Reid Ferring. "Mesolithic to Neolithic transitions: new results from shell-middens in the western Algarve, Portugal." Antiquity 77, no. 295 (March 2003): 75–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00061366.

Full text
Abstract:
New research on shell middens in the Algarve region of southern Portugal shows continuity of marine exploitation from the Mesolithic into the early Neolithic periods, where the Neolithic period is defined by the appearance of pottery in c 5500BC. The authors propose that either shellfish remained important to Neolithic people in Portugal or that Mesolithic and Neolithic subsistence strategies co-existed in this area for a relatively long time.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Telegin, D. Ya, I. D. Potekhina, M. Lillie, and M. M. Kovaliukh. "The chronology of the Mariupol-type cemeteries of Ukraine re-visited." Antiquity 76, no. 292 (June 2002): 356–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x0009044x.

Full text
Abstract:
Recent results of radiocarbon analyses from sites in Ukraine suggest that a revision of the chronology of the Late mesolithic and early Neolithic is required. The subsequent Neolithic period up to the beginning of the Early Bronze Age (c.3000 cal BC) should be divided into two separate periods, the Neolithic and Neo-eneolithic.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Si-Ammour, S. "The Chronology of the Neolithic in Northwest Africa." Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki 164, no. 3 (2022): 228–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.228-242.

Full text
Abstract:
This article considers the chrono-cultural evolution in the Northwest Africa territories during the Neolithic period. A systematic chronology based on specialized literature on the chrono-cultural features of this period in the Sahara and the Maghreb was inferred. It covers the following three major Neolithic currents characteristic of the Neolithic period in Northwest Africa: the Saharan Sudanese Neolithic, the Neolithic of Capsian Tradition, and the Mediterranean Neolithic. These currents were studied using the data on cultural behaviors with some radiocarbon dates. The results obtained revealed the features of the evolution from the Neolithization process to the full establishment of the Neolithic economy of production, as well as, a possible continuity to a Final Neolithic phase that lasted longer in some regions despite other regions that transitioned to the Eneolithic and the Iron Age. It was concluded that the evolution path that determined the characteristics of the Early, Middle, Late, and Final Neolithic phases was almost the same in different territories of the northwestern part of the African continent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Clarke, Joanne. "The Ceramic Neolithic Period in Northern Cyprus." Cahiers du Centre d'Etudes Chypriotes 17, no. 1 (1992): 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/cchyp.1992.1254.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Zhang, Yiqing. "History of Shoushan Stone Culture Neolithic Period." Communications in Humanities Research 23, no. 1 (December 20, 2023): 23–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/23/20230222.

Full text
Abstract:
Fuzhous cultural roots can be traced back over 6000 years to the Neolithic period. It evolved from a barbarian land to a prominent political, economic, and cultural center over 2000 years. The region witnessed the development of various prehistoric cultures like the Keqiutou, Tanshishan, and Huangguashan cultures. These cultures left behind archaeological sites with stone tools, pottery, and other artifacts, reflecting the lives of ancient Fuzhou inhabitants and the significant influences on other regions. The Fucun site in Fuzhou, as it featured the use of stone tools made from Shoushan stone, provided valuable insights into the Neolithic Age. These tools played a crucial role in the daily lives and production activities of the ancient Fuzhou inhabitants, brought the advancement of labor tools and productivity during that era and potentially influenced the later art and culture of the region.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Radmanovic, Darko, Desanka Kostic, Jelena Lujic, and Svetlana Blazic. "Ornitofauna from the archaeological sites in Vojvodina (Serbia)." Zbornik Matice srpske za prirodne nauke, no. 125 (2013): 111–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmspn1325111r.

Full text
Abstract:
After decades-long vertebrate fauna research, out of 42 archaeological sites in Vojvodina (Serbia) from different periods ranging from the Neolithic to the Middle Ages, remains of birds were registered at 17 sites (4 from the Neolithic, 1 from the Early Iron Age, 7 from the Late Iron Age, 5 from the Roman Period, 1 from the Migration Period, and 4 from the Middle Ages). A total of 14 species and 4 genera were registered for this vertebrate class. The richest ornithofauna is from the Neolithic, where 9 species and 3 genera were registered. The Migration and Medieval periods are next with 4 registered species and one genus each. There were 3 species registered from the Roman Period, and 2 species from the Late Iron Age. The poorest ornitofauna was registered from the Early Iron Age, only one species.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Stojic, Milorad. "Response to the contribution: On Neolithic authenticity of finds from Belica by Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric." Starinar, no. 63 (2013): 301–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sta1363301s.

Full text
Abstract:
In the last issue of Starinar (LXII/2012) a contribution On Neolithic Authenticity of Finds from Belica was published. The authors Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric (further A-P), dispute the 'Neolithic' provenience of finds from the village Belica. The reason is based on two articles published by me and possibly the pending publication in T?bingen of my monograph Belica, the Greatest Group Find of Neolithic Artistic Cult Sculpture. A-P based their conclusion that the objects from Belica are not 'Neolithic' on the premise that the pit with these objects did not exist, that the objects are of 'contemporary provenience', most probably made by 'an archeologist-amateur aiming to create confusion in Serbian archaeology', that there are 'no analogies for them', that the site in Belica represents 'a small Neolithic settlement', that 'objects were made mechanically' and that traces of fast revolving 'grinding instruments' are visible on them. Also, A-P cite me as the only author to have written about the find from Belica and who believes that the find belongs to the Neolithic period. Technical, geodetic and photo documentation from systematic excavations, as well as the homogeneity of protostarcevo material confirm the existence of a pit, belonging to early Neolith. Four radiocarbon tests prove, apart from the characteristics of the material and the analogies, that the objects are not 'contemporary provenience' but belong to the Early Neolithic period. In connection with the possibility, as A-P state, that 'an archaeologist-amateur ... dug in the finds in the earth.' aiming to 'produce confusion in Serbian archaeology' I cite here what this 'archaeologist-amateur' needed to know to do this. He needed to shape artistically 93 objects of four typically Neolithic materials, stone, flint, bone and pottery (16 pottery, 66 stone, 11 bone objects) and to dig them in clandestinely, together with some protostarcevo pottery. He would need to find various types of stone which are not found in the region, such as serpentine and albite, and to make several dozen objects from them; to find animal bones (Bos/Cervus), from the protostarcevo period and make a large number of figurines exclusively of this material; then using baked clay (as A-P state), also from the protostarcevo period, make anthropomorphic figurines. He would then have to put all these objects into a pit which he dug out in the centre of the Neolithic site, surrounded by a trench 75 m in diameter and then cover it with a great quantity of ochre. To fill up the pit clay of specific content would have to be transport from somewhere else. He would also need to have excellent knowledge of the religious symbols of Neolith, (particularly the connection of the symbolism of woman and moon, as well as the symbolism of moon, woman, snake etc.), to shape such objects which stylistically, typologically, chronologically and symbolically completely correspond with the cultural tradition of the Stone Age of Europe, Asia Minor, Near and Middle East, including the ambivalent figures (which represent at the same time man and woman, i.e. male and female symbols, otherwise a recent term in archaeology) and to know how the vulva looks immediately before birth which was depicted on all figurines of woman in childbirth in Belica. The statement by A-P that 'there are no analogies' is not correct because numerous analogies are known in Serbia and other parts of the Balkan Peninsula as well as in Asia Minor, the Near and Middle East. As geomagnetic investigations confirm, the protostarcevo settlement in Belica, contrary to the opinion of A-P that it is 'a small Neolithic settlement', is one of the largest settlements from the Early Neolith in Serbia, covering an area of more than 7 ha. Also the statement, that parallel traces, such as those which exist on the surface and in grooves on the stone objects, are the remains of work with 'contemporary grind tools with a large number of rotations' is incorrect. The expertise of professional archeometrologists using a 3D electron microscope in the Institute for geology in Heidelberg and an experiment by conservators from the University in T?bingen confirm that the finish of the outer surface and the finish of grooves on the objects of serpentine (expertise was carried out exactly on objects which A-P explicitly marked as examples of mechanical finish) was done with typical Neolithic techniques. The statement that I was the only one who wrote about the Belica finds and identified them as Neolithic, is also not true. Although it is not important in this discussion about the 'Neolithic originality' of the Belica find, the fact is that apart from me five other authors have written on this subject.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Neolithic period"

1

Wiriyaromp, Warrachai, and n/a. "The neolithic period in Thailand." University of Otago. Department of Anthropology, 2008. http://adt.otago.ac.nz./public/adt-NZDU20080904.111233.

Full text
Abstract:
There are two principal models that purport to interpret the evidence for the origins of the Neolithic period in Thailand. Both stress the importance of rice cultivation and the domestication of a range of animals. One incorporates archaeological and linguistic evidence in identifying the origins as the result of the diffusion of farming communities into Southeast Asia and India from a source in the Yangtze River valley. The alternative stresses a local evolutionary pathway whereby indigenous hunter-gatherers began to cultivate rice within Thailand. This dissertation is centred on the results of the excavation of Ban Non Wat, in the Upper Mun Valley of Northeast Thailand. This has provided one of the largest, best dated and provenanced samples of occupation and mortuary remains of a Neolithic community so far available in Southeast Asia. Its principal objective is to define the motifs incised, impressed and painted onto the surface of ceramic mortuary vessels, in order to permit a comparison with other assemblages first in Thailand, then in Southeast Asia north into China. It is held that if there are close parallels over a wide geographic area, in these motifs, then it would support a model of diffusion. If there are not, then the alternative of local origins would need to be examined closely. It is argued that the similarity in motifs, particularly a stylised human figure, between Thai and Vietnamese sites lends support to a common origin for these groups. The motifs are not so obvious when examining the southern Chinese data, although the mode of decoration by painting, incising and impressing recur there. This, in conjunction with mortuary rituals, weaving technology, the domestic dog, and the linguistic evidence, sustains a model for demic diffusion. However, the presence of ceramic vessels also decorated with impressed/incised techniques in maritime hunter-gatherer contexts stresses that the actual Neolithic settlement may have been more complex.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Karsten, Per. "Att kasta yxan i sjön en studie över rituell tradition och förändring utifrån skånska neolitiska offerfynd /." Stockholm : Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1994. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/31654751.html.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Coolidge, J. W. "Southern Turkmenistan in the Neolithic a petrographic case study /." Oxford : Archaeopress, 2005. http://books.google.com/books?id=BjVmAAAAMAAJ.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Meakes, Alison A. "Scientific analysis of Neolithic period ceramics from Fars, Iran." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2016. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/36039/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis forms the first application of scientific analysis (thin section petrography, electron microprobe and scanning electron microscopy) to Neolithic ceramics from Fars province, Iran. The research specifically addresses the questions surrounding the choice of raw materials, production techniques and the use and consumption of ceramic vessels at these village sites. I have sought to attempt a deeper understanding of the past socio-economic context of ceramic production and consumption, as well as draw comparisons with wider ceramic technologies in the surrounding regions of Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia and Central Asia. Analysis and interpretation of decorated ceramics from Neolithic Southwest Iran has traditionally focused on decorative designs, where coloured pigments have clearly played an influential role. However, very little was specifically known about the raw materials, manufacture, and production stages of these wares. The samples selected for analysis include newly excavated and previously unpublished ceramics that have been incorporated into an updated typology. This is then used to provide detailed characterisation of the materials and techniques employed by past potters to create the wares. Ceramics from different sites and valley locations were compared, and the development and changes in pigment raw materials and painted motif selection is demonstrated across different village sites and throughout the Neolithic time period. The introduction of manganese black and bichrome designs at Tol-e Nurabad is particularly interesting amidst the widely used iron oxide pigments and monochrome designs recorded from other sites. The choice of these raw materials is considered in respect to potters’ interaction with their surrounding landscape and in the context of other crafts and productive technologies. The transfer of potting knowledge is also considered, with visible evidence of a range of skill levels and marked corrections and adjustments made to painted motifs on the vessels studied. The use and consumption of vessels in Neolithic Fars is based on the remains of kitchen hearths and cooking equipment, namely clay balls and river cobbles, combined with use-wear analysis to show that plain wares were not subjected to direct heat and that painted wares were most likely used in the presentation and consumption of food. The painted motifs and decorative designs created on Neolithic vessels in this study are compared to other excavated sherds and whole or reconstructed vessels and show a broad similarity in apparent manufacture and painted designs. I suggest that this is evidence of the capacity of ceramics to store visual information, and to signify the Neolithic style of design that was actively shared and participated in across village sites in Fars. This was potentially done to demonstrate group membership and contribute to the construction of community, perhaps at feasting events which have been proposed across this region during the Neolithic, which would have provided venues for the consumption of such ceramics alongside the transference of decorative schemes between villages. Wider comparisons with contemporary Neolithic wares in the surrounding Iranian region, as well as Mesopotamia, Anatolia and Central Asia are also drawn, linking the communities of Fars with wider Neolithic technologies and styles.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Liu, Li. "The Chinese neolithic : trajectories to early states /." Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/cam051/2004049440.html.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Quinn, Colin Patrick. "Vital signs : costly signaling and personal adornment in the near eastern early neolithic." Online access for everyone, 2006. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Thesis/Fall2006/c_quinn_121106.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Thomas, Antonia. "Art and architecture in Neolithic Orkney : process, temporality and context." Thesis, University of the Highlands and Islands, 2016. https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/portal/en/studentthesis/art-and-architecture-in-neolithic-orkney(8a1d24c9-bfe6-4dd8-a215-70076c10600e).html.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis presents a contextual analysis of Neolithic art and architecture in Orkney. Focussing upon the Heart of Neolithic Orkney World Heritage Site, it details the results of original fieldwork at three sites with in situ dressed and decorated stonework: Maeshowe, Skara Brae and the Ness of Brodgar. It combines the re-interpretation of known architecturally-situated carvings with primary data from new survey and excavation work, and reports the discovery of many previously unrecorded examples. This study reveals a diversity of stoneworking practices at these three sites which contradicts a broad catch-all term of 'art', demanding a more nuanced investigation. Previous studies have discussed the in situ decoration at Maeshowe and Skara Brae, but these have never been compared in detail, and the long histories of attention at these sites have led to questions over the authenticity of their carvings. The discovery of hundreds of comparable, in situ decorated stones from sealed Neolithic deposits during excavations at the Ness of Brodgar demolishes these doubts. The insight that this fieldwork has allowed is crucial. Excavation exposes aspects of the architecture which normally remain hidden, and allows the recording of decoration and stoneworking in situ, and as it is first revealed. This takes the discussion beyond the surface to allow an understanding of how stones were worked and decorated as part of the processes of construction and occupation. This challenges many narratives of Neolithic art and architecture, which have tended to focus upon superficial aspects of visual form, overlooking the ways in which buildings and stones came to be worked, carved, built and appreciated. It allows an exploration of how buildings and carvings emerge though process, and how the temporality of the working, decoration and appreciation of particular stones relates to the wider context of art and architecture in Neolithic Orkney.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Goodale, Nathan B. "Convergence in the neolithic : human population growth at the dawn of agriculture." Pullman, Wash. : Washington State University, 2009. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Dissertations/Spring2009/N_Goodale_040309.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gantley, Michael John. "The rites of spring : a cognitive analysis of ritual activity in the agricultural transition in south-west Asia and north-western Europe." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2016. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e84a90b0-5fba-4841-96af-b17c56d1ebd4.

Full text
Abstract:
What cognitive and cultural mechanisms facilitated the agricultural transition? In this thesis, I evaluated the hypothesis that ritual action involving large groups of people meeting regularly created a significant sense of collective purpose to bring about the social cohesion necessary for agriculture. I test this hypothesis against the archaeological record in two distinct regions: south west Asia and north-western Europe. Following Whitehouse's (2000) Modes of Religiosity theory, I show that the agricultural transition in both regions is connected with a shift from an imagistic to an increasingly doctrinal mode of religious behaviour. This result is important because it brings together insights from the prehistoric archaeology and cognitive anthropology to generate new knowledge about the agricultural transition.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fraser, Shannon Marguerite. "Physical, social and intellectual landscapes in the Neolithic contextualizing Scottish and Irish Megalithic architecture /." Thesis, Connect to e-thesis, 1996. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/787/.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Glasgow, 1996.
BLL : DX192053. Ph.D. thesis submitted to the Faculty of Art, Department of Archaeology, University of Glasgow, 1996. Includes bibliographical references. Print copy also available.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Neolithic period"

1

Sundari, Ekowati. Artefacts of Neolithic period. [Jakarta]: Indonesian Heritage Society, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Reddy, V. Rami. Neolithic and post-Neolithic cultures. New Delhi, India: Mittal Publications, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Jadin, Ivan. Néolithique ancien d'Europe et datations carbone 14: Approches informatique. Liège: Préhistoire liégeoise asbl, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Watkins, Trevor. Neolithic corporate identities. Berlin: Ex Oriente, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Thomas, Julian. Understanding the neolithic. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Peter, Topping, and Neolithic Studies Group, eds. Neolithic landscapes. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Verma, Atul Kumar. Neolithic culture of eastern India. Delhi: Ramanand Vidya Bhawan, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Paul, Halstead, ed. Neolithic Society in Greece. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Santacana, Joan. El neolítico. Madrid: Anaya, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Whittle, A. W. R. Problems in neolithic archaeology. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Neolithic period"

1

Noy, Tamar. "Seated Clay Figurines from the Neolithic Period, Israel." In Archaeology and Fertility Cult in the Ancient Mediterranean, 63–67. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner Publishing Company, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/zg.15.09noy.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Matthews, Roger, and Hassan Fazeli Nashli. "Domesticating Iran: the Neolithic period, 10,000–5200 BC." In The Archaeology of Iran from the Palaeolithic to the Achaemenid Empire, 54–110. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003224129-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Su, Nguyen Khac, Pham Minh Huyen, and Tong Trung Tin. "Northern Vietnam from The Neolithic to The Han Period." In Southeast Asia, 177–208. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003416609-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Khanipour, Morteza, and Mohammad Hossein Azizi Kharanaghi. "Fars as a Multi-Cultural Zone During the Neolithic Period." In The Epipalaeolithic and Neolithic in the Eastern Fertile Crescent, 241–60. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003335504-17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

De Smedt, Philippe, Charles French, Timothy Kinnaird, Tonko Rajkovača, Aleksandar Milekić, Petros Chatzimpaloglou, Jeroen Verhegge, et al. "An integrated geoarchaeological approach to the investigation of multi-period prehistoric settlements – the case of Neolithic Drenovac." In Advances in On- and Offshore Archaeological Prospection, 191–200. Kiel: Universitätsverlag Kiel | Kiel University Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.38072/978-3-928794-83-1/p20.

Full text
Abstract:
A multi-method geoarchaeological investigation was performed to reconstruct multi-phase Neolithic settlement. Invasive and non-invasive surveys showed potential for providing archaeological and environmental landscape data in this complex setting. Large-area geophysical surveys showed potential for deriving stratigraphic information.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lee, Gyoung-Ah. "The Chulmun Period of Korea: Current Findings and Discourse on Korean Neolithic Culture." In Handbook of East and Southeast Asian Archaeology, 451–81. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6521-2_28.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kuo, Su-chiu. "Archaeological Cultures and Their Maritime Interactions during the Tapenkeng Period (5600–4200 BP)." In New Frontiers in the Neolithic Archaeology of Taiwan (5600–1800 BP), 55–97. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9263-5_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kendrick, T. D., and C. F. C. Hawkes. "Neolithic Period." In Archaeology in England and Wales 1914–1931, 56–73. Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315515458-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Watrous, L. Vance, and Maryanne Schultz. "Final Neolithic Period:." In Archaeological Survey of the Gournia Landscape, 17–20. INSTAP Academic Press (Institute for Aegean Prehistory), 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt3fgvh4.13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Rollefson, Gary O. "The Neolithic Period." In Near Eastern Archaeology, 244–53. Penn State University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781575065472-039.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Neolithic period"

1

Morgunova, Nina. "THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM THE NEOLITHIC TO THE BRONZE AGE IN THE VOLGA-URALS: CRITERIA AND CHRONOLOGY." In Evolution of Neolithic cultures of Eastern Europe. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-189-4-2019-63-64.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Mirsoatova, Sayyora. "COMMUNITIES OF THE NEOLITHIC PERIOD IN UZBEKISTAN AND THEIR SOCIAL RELATIONS." In DO DESENVOLVIMENTO MUNDIAL COMO RESULTADO DE REALIZAÇÕES EM CIÊNCIA E INVESTIGAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA. European Scientific Platform, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36074/09.10.2020.v4.19.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kirichenko, Dmitrii, and Vusal Hasanov. "An artificially deformed skull of the Late Neolithic period from Azerbaijan." In Antiquities of East Europe, South Asia and South Siberia in the context of connections and interactions within the Eurasian cultural space (new data and concepts). Institute for the History of Material Culture Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-907053-34-2-119-120.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Korolev, Arkadii. "The problem of the transitional period between the Neolithic and the Eneolithic in the Volga region Forest-Steppe." In Evolution of Neolithic cultures of Eastern Europe. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-189-4-2019-41-43.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Andreev, K., A. Vybornov, A. Kudashov, and M. Kulkova. "ХРОНОЛОГИЯ НЕОЛИТА МАРИЙСКОГО ПОВОЛЖЬЯ." In Радиоуглерод в археологии и палеоэкологии: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Материалы международной конференции, посвященной 80-летию старшего научного сотрудника ИИМК РАН, кандидата химических наук Ганны Ивановны Зайцевой. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-213-6-9-10.

Full text
Abstract:
During the Neolithic period, several ceramic traditions were developed on the territory of the middle Volga forest: unornamented, pin-pointed, combed, and pit-combed. The problem of their chronological correlation is very relevant at this stage of study. Currently, 29 radiocarbon dates have been obtained from Neolithic materials from 10 sites in the region. The presented work is devoted to their analysis. The Neolithization of the Mari Volga region is associated with the emergence of carriers of the tradition of making unornamented ware at the turn of the 7th-6th millennium BC. Starting from the middle of the 6th millennium BC. In the region, the tradition of ornamentation of ceramics with pin-pointed is spreading, which coexists with non-decorated dishes. With the beginning of the 5th millennium BC. the penetration of representatives of the Kama culture and pit-comb ceramics into the forest Middle Volga region may be related. Also radiocarbon dates allow confirming the coexistence at the beginning of the 5th millennium BC. in the region of all the ceramic traditions presented in the Neolithic period. At the same time, the time of extinction of the indicated Neolithic ceramic traditions is associated with the middle – third quarter of the 5th millennium BC.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

I., PONKRATOVA. "MOBILE ART OF THE STONE AGE OF KAMCHATKA." In MODERN SOLUTIONS TO CURRENT PROBLEMS OF EURASIAN ARCHEOLOGY. Altai State Univercity, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.14258/msapea.2023.3.55.

Full text
Abstract:
When studying objects of mobile art in the Stone Age of Kamchatka, it was assumed that the most ancient artifacts were personal ornamentation (~final Paleolithic, 13.3-12.5 thousand years ago, 12.0-10.1 thousand years ago). These are beads and pendants made of pyrophyllite, agalmatolite, amber, quartzite, slate Stone sculpture was made in the Neolithic (~7.8-4.5 thousand years ago - the beginning of the 2nd millennium AD), while throughout the entire period the ancient artist depicted figurines of fish. Various zoomorphic sculptures (whales, seals, bears, deer, dogs, foxes) appeared in the Middle Neolithic era (~4000-1500 years ago). This is probably due to the formation of a new fauna at that time. During the same period, anthropomorphic sculpture were made. The stone figures are made of local stone rocks (obsidian, flint, chalcedony, basalt) with flake stone technology and sharp retouching. The objects could be used in ritual activities, depict characters from Itel'men myths.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Mazurkevich, A., P. Kittel, Y. Maigrot, E. Dolbunova, M. Krapiec, and A. Ginter. "ХРОНОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ РАМКИ АРХЕОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ КОМПЛЕКСОВ МНОГОСЛОЙНОГО ПАМЯТНИКА СЕРТЕЯ II (ПО ДАННЫМ РАДИОУГЛЕРОДНОГО ДАТИРОВАНИЯ)." In Радиоуглерод в археологии и палеоэкологии: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Материалы международной конференции, посвященной 80-летию старшего научного сотрудника ИИМК РАН, кандидата химических наук Ганны Ивановны Зайцевой. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-213-6-52-54.

Full text
Abstract:
Dr. Ganna Zaitseva participated a lot in researches conducted within the North-Western archaeological expedition of the State Hermitage Museum and elaborating the chronological timeframes for Neolithic in this region. Multidisci- plinary investigations of the last five years changed a lot historical schemes and environmental reconstructions made for Serteya II site, located in Smolensk region. The Serteya II site is a multilayer complex used by hunter–fisher–gath- erer communities in the 9th-8th mill. BC, and from the end of the 7th till the end of the 3rd mill. BC. Archaeological structures and horizons were developed in the palaeolake shore zone within changing water regimes and changes in the environmental conditions. Based on the most convergent dendrochronological sequences, two floating chronolo- gies were compiled, for pine wood 53 years old and larch wood 54 years old. Finally five OSL dates have been obtained, but the acquired age of geological ones significantly exceeded expectations. Three dates indicate the Neolithic period (contrary to expected XVII century), and a chronological inversion of OSL dates can be seen. Surprisingly spectrom- etry measurements of gytia sediments, despite of significant amount of organic matter allow as to calculate the dose rate and then to date one piece of Neolithic pottery. The obtained age perfectly corresponded to present state of knowledge.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Gusentsova, T., and M. Kulkova. "НОВЫЕ РАДИОУГЛЕРОДНЫЕ ДАТЫ ТОРФЯНИКОВОЙ СТОЯНКИ ПОДОЛЬЕ 3 В ЮЖНОМ ПРИЛАДОЖЬЕ." In Радиоуглерод в археологии и палеоэкологии: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Материалы международной конференции, посвященной 80-летию старшего научного сотрудника ИИМК РАН, кандидата химических наук Ганны Ивановны Зайцевой. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-213-6-23-24.

Full text
Abstract:
Podolije 3 site is located in the basin of Lava river on the Southern coast of the Ladoga. The site was occupied several times during Neolithic period, in the Early Metal Epoch and in the Late Medieval Age. The cultural peat layer contents the remains of wood fishing constructions of end of 4 ka. BC. This artefacts belong to people of cultures of the Typical Comb Ware, the Late Comb Ware, the Late Pit-Comb Ware, the organic tempered ceramics and asbestos ceramics. The first period of occupation of these people is dated from 3900–1800 cal BC and second period associates with a Medieval time, from 1493–1780 cal AD.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Andreev, K., O. Andreeva, M. Kulkova, and M. Oinonen. "ПЕРВЫЕ ДАННЫЕ ПО РАДИОУГЛЕРОДНОЙ ХРОНОЛОГИИ МЕЗОЛИТА ЛЕСОСТЕПНОГО ПОВОЛЖЬЯ." In Радиоуглерод в археологии и палеоэкологии: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Материалы международной конференции, посвященной 80-летию старшего научного сотрудника ИИМК РАН, кандидата химических наук Ганны Ивановны Зайцевой. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-213-6-8-9.

Full text
Abstract:
The article analyzes the recent absolute dates of the Mesolithic forest-steppe Volga region, gives their interpretation. The Mesolithic period, according to the latest radiocarbon data, originates in the forest-steppe Volga region no later than the middle of the 9th millennium BC. and exists until the middle of the 7th millennium BC, while at the final stage, apparently, the Mesolithic inhabitants coexist with the early Neolithic alien population.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fribus, A., and S. Grushin. "СЕРИЯ РАДИОУГЛЕРОДНЫХ ДАТ С РАЗНОВРЕМЕННОГО МОГИЛЬНИКА ЧУМЫШ-ПЕРЕКАТ В ЗАПАДНОМ ПРИСАЛАИРЬЕ." In Радиоуглерод в археологии и палеоэкологии: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Материалы международной конференции, посвященной 80-летию старшего научного сотрудника ИИМК РАН, кандидата химических наук Ганны Ивановны Зайцевой. Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31600/978-5-91867-213-6-103-104.

Full text
Abstract:
The article presents an analysis of 6 radiocarbon dates from the Chumysh-Perekat Necropolis in the south of the Western Siberia. Neolithic burials dated from the VI – first half of the V Millennium BC. Ritual objects on the basis of radiocarbon dates are assigned to the second half of the I Millennium BC. Burials of the Early Middle Ages show a chronological range of the III–VII centuries AD by 2σ (95.4 %) and a narrower period of the V–VII centuries AD by 1σ (68.2 %).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Neolithic period"

1

Gabrilchuk, M. A. A NEW SITE BIDJAN-4 OF THE MIDDLE NEOLITHIC PERIOD IN THE JEWISH AUTONOMOUS REGION. "Росток", 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/gab-2018-08.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Horejs, Barbara, and Ulrike Schuh, eds. PREHISTORY & WEST ASIAN/NORTHEAST AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY 2021–2023. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, December 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1553/oeai.pwana2021-2023.

Full text
Abstract:
The long-established research of Prehistory and West Asian/Northeast African archaeology (the former Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology, OREA) at the Austrian Academy of Sciences was transformed into a department of the »new« Austrian Archaeological Institute (OeAI) at the Austrian Academy of Sciences in 2021. This merging of several institutes into the new OeAI offers a wide range of new opportunities for basic and interdisciplinary research, which support the traditional research focus as well as the development of new projects in world archaeology. The research areas of the Department of Prehistory and West Asian/Northeast African Archaeology include Quaternary archaeology, Prehistory, Near Eastern archaeology and Egyptology. The groups cover an essential cultural area of prehistoric and early historical developments in Europe, Northeast Africa and West Asia. Prehistory is embedded in the world archaeology concept without geographical borders, including projects beyond this core zone, as well as a scientific and interdisciplinary approach. The focus lies in the time horizon from the Pleistocene about 2.6 million years ago to the transformation of societies into historical epochs in the 1st millennium BC. The chronological expertise of the groups covers the periods Palaeolithic, Neolithic, Chalcolithic, Bronze Age and Early Iron Age. The archaeology of West Asia and Northeast Africa is linked to the Mediterranean and Europe, which enables large-scale and chronologically broad basic research on human history. The department consists of the following seven groups: »Quaternary Archaeology«, »Prehistoric Phenomena«, »Prehistoric Identities«, »Archaeology in Egypt and Sudan«, »Archaeology of the Levant«, »Mediterranean Economies« and »Urnfield Culture Networks«. The groups conduct fieldwork and material analyses in Austria, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova, Greece, Cyprus, Türkiye, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Sudan and South Africa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Neolithic period' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography