Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Nature journals / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Nature journals'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Nature journals.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 10 December 2022

Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Nature journals.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Kubyshko, Olga Vladimirovna. "L.P. Sabaneev’s journals: history of hunting journals, collection of works "Nature", "Journal of Hunting", journal "Nature and Hunting"." Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, no. 1 (March 24, 2016): 176–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2016-1-176-185.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Sieber, D., J. A. Lee, J. K. Keller, M. A. Mathiason, and R. S. Go. "Extent and nature of advertising in leading hematology-oncology journals." Journal of Clinical Oncology 25, no. 18_suppl (June 20, 2007): 6634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.6634.

Full text

Abstract:

6634 Background: Advertising in most medical journals is dominated by pharmaceuticals in part due to journal policy. This is primarily a fiscal consideration. Because advertising clearly influence physicians’ prescribing pattern, an indirect conflict of interest exists and may potentially affect patient care. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the extent of advertising in leading hematology-oncology (HO) journals published in the U.S. and to compare the findings to those of multi-specialty journals. Methods: We evaluated the following high impact journals that publish original research and included all issues issued in 2006: Journal of National Cancer Institute (JNCI), Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO), Blood, New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and Annals of Internal Medicine (AIM). Of these, only JNCI (currently not affiliated with U.S. NCI) is not owned by a medical society. The number and nature of advertising for each journal were collected. Results: There was an average of 84, 283, and 459 pages for each issue of JNCI, JCO, and Blood, respectively. Overall, HO journals allocated 20% (range, 8–32) of their pages for advertising. JCO had the most, while JNCI the least, advertising, both classified (6% vs 1% vs 1%; P = 0.001) and non-classified (26% vs 10% vs 7%; P = 0.001). Among non- classified advertising, the major categories were drugs (48.5%), journal information (14.1%), conference announcements (10.1%), research/clinical trial (7%), disease information (6.4%), continuing medical education (3.6%), and others (10.3%). Among journals, JCO had the most drug advertising (72.5%), followed by Blood (65.6%), while JNCI did not have any (0%). Compared to multi-specialty journals, HO journals had less amount of classified (3% [range, 1–6] vs 15% [range, 10–19]; P = 0.001) and non-classified (17% [range, 7–26] vs 21% [range, 18–25]; P = 0.001) advertising. Conclusions: While less than their multi-specialty counterparts, HO journals allocated a substantial proportion of their pages to advertising, the overwhelming majority of which were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. The extent of advertising varied by journal, but was most prominent with JCO. Notably, JNCI did not have any drug advertising. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Howard, Louise, and Greg Wilkinson. "Impact factors of psychiatric journals." British Journal of Psychiatry 170, no. 2 (February 1997): 109–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.170.2.109.

Full text

Abstract:

BackgroundWe examined citation data for the British Journal of Psychiatry (BJP) and four other general psychiatry journals to assess their impact on the scientific community.MethodData on three measures of citations (total number of citations, impact factor and ranking by impact factor) were obtained from Journal Citation Reports for 1985–1994. Rank correlations from year to year were calculated.ResultsThe BJP currently ranks sixth of all psychiatry journals when journals are ranked by impact factor. The journal's impact factor fell between 1985 and 1990 and this was followed by a rise in impact factor after 1991. The BJP did not rank in the top 10 psychiatry journals between 1991 and 1993. Archives of General Psychiatry is cited more frequently than any other psychiatry journal, with the American Journal of Psychiatry usually ranking second. Psychopharmacology journals are replacing more general journals in the top rankings. Rankings of most journals have become less stable in recent years.ConclusionsThe BJP would have to change the nature and number of papers published to improve its impact factor. There are a number of limitations to citation data and such data are only one of several factors useful in evaluating the importance of a journal's contribution to scientific and clinical communities.Conflict of interestThese condauthor is Editor of the British Journal of Psychiatry.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Asai, Sumiko. "Strategies to Increase the Number of Open Access Journals: The Cases of Elsevier and Springer Nature." Journal of Scholarly Publishing 53, no. 2 (February 1, 2022): 75–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.53.2.02.

Full text

Abstract:

In recent years, major commercial publishers have strengthened their presence in both the subscription journal market and the open access journal market. Examining 447 journals from Elsevier and 550 from Springer Nature, this study investigates three strategies for enlarging the number of gold open access journals: the launch of new journals, mergers with other publishers, and partnerships with research institutes. The results reveal that these publishers adopted different strategies for expanding their journal portfolios. While Springer Nature relied significantly on merging with established publishers, Elsevier recently launched many new journals independently. Approximately 60 per cent of Springer Nature journals and 45 per cent of Elsevier journals are published on behalf of research institutes. Therefore, collaboration with research institutes has contributed to the increasing number of journal titles. As major publishers expand their open access businesses, it is necessary to monitor their activities from a policy perspective of pro-competition.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Brainard, Jeffrey. "Nature journals ink open-access deal." Science 370, no. 6515 (October 22, 2020): 391.1–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.370.6515.391-a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Herubel, Jean-Pierre V. M. "The Nature of Three History Journals." Collection Management 12, no. 3-4 (May 17, 1990): 57–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j105v12n03_04.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Gibney, Elizabeth. "Open journals that piggyback on arXiv gather momentum." Nature 530, no. 7588 (January 4, 2016): 117–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.19102.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Haddow, Gaby. "A Combination of Citation Analyses Can Reveal the Nature of a Journal’s Scholarly Communication, Its Influence in a Scientific Community, and the Geographic Location of Its Authors and Citers." Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 1, no. 4 (December 11, 2006): 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/b8w30v.

Full text

Abstract:

A review of: Bonnevie-Nebelong, Ellen. “Methods for Journal Evaluation: Journal Citation Identity, Journal Citation Image, and Internationalisation.” Scientometrics 66.2 (Jan. 2006): 411-24. Objective – To conduct a number of citation analyses of the Journal of Documentation (JDOC), comparing the results with analyses of the Journal of Information Science (JIS), and the Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology (JASIST) to illustrate features of JDOC. Design – Bibliometric study. Setting – Library and information science journal literature. Sample – Citations given by and given to the JDOC were analysed and compared to those from the JASIST and the JIS. Author affiliation data were analysed from articles published in JDOC and from articles citing JDOC. The data were drawn from three time periods: 1975-2003, 1980-2003, and 1990-2003. Methods – Journal Citation Identity was examined for the period 1990-2003. The analysis involved calculating the number of different journals represented by citations given by a journal in a publishing year. The resulting citation/citee ratio is indicative of diversity and extent of scholarly sources used by a journal. Journal Citation Identity was also examined by calculating the number of journal self-citations (in the period 1980 to 2003) as a proportion of the total number of citations given by the journal. A high rate of journal self-citations suggests introspection or isolation from other journals in its field. The content of the three journals was examined for the period 1973-2003 to determine the proportion of scientific content (i.e. articles, notes, reviews, and letters). Journal Citation Image was examined by calculating journal self-citations as a proportion of the citations given by other journals to the sample journal. The result signifies the degree of a journal’s visibility in its field. A second aspect of Journal Citation Image was investigated using the New Journal Diffusion Factor (N JDF). The N JDF was carried out for each year between 1975 and 2003 and calculated the average number of different journals that cite an article in a sample journal. A high number of different citing journals implies influence in the field. The N JDF for the sample journals was compared with their Journal Impact Factor (JIF) over the same period. Two further analyses of data gathered from 1990 to 2003 were conducted for the Journal of Documentation. The first identified journals most frequently co-cited with JDOC, an analysis that can locate a journal within or outside its field. Lastly, Internationalisation analyses were carried out for JDOC. Internationalisation relates to the geographic affiliations of authors of JDOC articles and of authors citing JDOC. Geographic affiliation was analysed using three classifications: affiliation in North America, Western Europe, or other geographic locations. Main results – Journal Citation Identity: JASIST was found to have the highest citation/citee ratio at 1.88, while JDOC and JIS had similar ratios of 1.50 and 1.44 respectively. This finding suggests JASIST draws its citations from fewer journals than JDOC and JIS. The scientific content of JDOC ranged from 18% to 50% in the period analysed, the lowest proportion of the three journals. All journals had seen a reduction in the proportion of journal self-citations over 23 years. Average journal self-citations for the period were 4.3% for JASIST, 3.9% for JDOC, and 3.4% for JIS. Journal Citation Image: The number of journal self-citations as a proportion of the total number of citations given to a journal was relatively stable for the three journals in the period 1991-2003. JASIST had a slightly higher rate at around 30%, the rate for JDOC was approximately 15%, and JIS showed the greatest variation ranging from 25% to 12%. In the years 1980 to 1990 JIS was found to have a much higher proportion of journal self-citations, spiking to over 85% in 1986. JDOC and JASIST self-cited at a rate that differed little over the full 1980 to 2003 period. The average N JDF for JDOC increased from just over 0.3 in 1975 to almost 0.5 in 2003. JIS had a steady average N JDF around 0.2 and JASIST an average of just over 0.3 in the same period. A comparison of the journals’ JIF in these years shows JIS is the only journal with an average JIF that is decreasing. The average JIF for JDOC and JASIST increased. JASIST was the most frequently co-cited journal with JDOC, followed by Information Processing and Management and JIS. Internationalisation: A large proportion of authors publishing in JDOC were affiliated with Western European institutions with a general trend showing decreasing numbers of authors from North America and other geographic areas. Authors citing JDOC were predominantly from North America in the 1990s, but by 2002 authors from Western Europe were citing JDOC in larger numbers. The proportion of citing authors from other regions remained steady at around 10% over the thirteen year period. Conclusions – In comparison with JASIST, the Journal Citation Identity of JDOC shows a broader scientific base with less dependence upon articles from its previous issues. JDOC is cited by a larger number of other journals than JASIST and JIS, indicating a higher degree of visibility in the scholarly community. The journals most often cited alongside JDOC mark it as firmly grounded in the field of library and information science. JDOC is attractive to Western European authors both as a publishing channel and as a journal to which they make reference.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Van Noorden, Richard. "Gates Foundation research can’t be published in top journals." Nature 541, no. 7637 (January 2017): 270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.21299.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Naik, Gautam. "Peer-review activists push psychology journals towards open data." Nature 543, no. 7644 (March 2017): 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.21549.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Bawden, David. "The once and future editorial." Journal of Documentation 72, no. 1 (January 11, 2016): 2–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-11-2015-0138.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the changing nature of abstracts in scholarly journals, with particular reference to Journal of Documentation. Design/methodology/approach – Selective literature review. Findings – The nature of the editorial is changing towards a more stand-alone and substantive article. Originality/value – The first discussion of the nature of the editorial in a scholarly information science journal.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Ackerson, Linda G., and Karen Chapman. "Identifying the Role of Multidisciplinary Journals in Scientific Research." College & Research Libraries 64, no. 6 (November 1, 2003): 468–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.64.6.468.

Full text

Abstract:

Scientists in focused research areas customarily use specialized journals, and yet multidisciplinary journals also are widely cited. Prior studies have investigated the characteristics of multidisciplinary journals, but none have considered the role this type of journal plays in scientific research. Citation data from Nature, Science, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences were used to profile the articles in the journals and the articles that cite them. In particular, when citation occurred across disciplines, the reason for the citation was investigated.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

"Announcement: Three new Nature journals." Nature 529, no. 7585 (January 2016): 128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/529128a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

ROS, Editorial Office. "A List of Highly Influential Journals." Reactive Oxygen Species 11 (February 26, 2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.20455/ros.2021.s.801.

Full text

Abstract:

This Education & Resources web page provides a list, in alphabetical order, of highly influential journals (typically with an impact factor of 10 or above) where high profile research articles on ROS may be found. This, however, is not intended to be a complete list. LIST IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER American Journal of Gastroenterology American Journal of Human Genetics American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Annals of Internal Medicine Annals of Neurology Autophagy Blood Brain British Medical Journal Cancer Research Cell (and Molecular Cell, Cancer Cell, Cell Metabolism, Cell Stem Cell, Developmental Cell, Cell Host Microbe) Cell Research Chest Circulation Circulation Research Current Biology EMBO J (and EMBO Molecular Medicine) European Heart Journal European Journal of Heart Failure European Respiratory Journal Gastroenterology Genes and Development Genome Biology Genome Research Gut Hepatology Immunity JAMA (and JAMA Internal Medicine, JAMA Cardiology) Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Journal of the American College of Cardiology (and JACC Cardiovascular Imaging, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, JACC Heart Failure) Journal of Cell Biology Journal of Clinical Investigation Journal of Experimental Medicine Journal of the American Chemical Society Journal of the National Cancer Institute Lancet (and Lancet Oncology, Lancet Neurology, Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology) Microbiome Molecular Biology and Evolution Molecular Cancer Molecular Plant Nature (and Nature Genetics, Nature Medicine, Nature Methods, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Materials, Nature Nanotechnology, Nature Communications, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, Nature Neuroscience, Nature Immunology, Nature Cell Biology, Nature Chemical Biology, Nature Microbiology, Nature Plants, Nature Chemical Biology) Neuron New England Journal of Medicine Nucleic Acids Research Plant Cell PLOS Medicine Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Science (and Science Signaling, Science Translational Medicine, Science Immunology)

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Cyranoski, David. "Chinese publishers vow to cleanse journals." Nature, April 25, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2012.10509.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Gul, Sumeer, Aasif Ahmad Mir, Sheikh Shueb, Nahida Tun Nisa, and Salma Nisar. "Peer Review Metrics and their influence on the Journal Impact." Journal of Information Science, December 14, 2021, 016555152110597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01655515211059773.

Full text

Abstract:

The manuscript processing timeline, a necessary facet of the publishing process, varies from journal to journal, and its influence on the journal impact needs to be studied. The current research looks into the correlation between the ‘Peer Review Metrics’ (submission to first editorial decision; submission to first post-review decision and submission to accept) and the ‘Journal Impact Data’ (2-year Impact Factor; 5-year Impact Factor; Immediacy Index; Eigenfactor Score and Article Influence Score). The data related to ‘Peer Review Metrics’ (submission to first editorial decision; submission to first post-review decision and submission to accept) and ‘Journal Impact Data’ (2-year Impact Factor; 5-year Impact Factor; Immediacy Index; Eigenfactor Score and Article Influence Score) were downloaded from the ‘Nature Research’ journals website https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/about/journal-metrics . Accordingly, correlations were drawn between the ‘Peer Review Metrics’ and the ‘Journal Impact Data’. If the time from ‘submission to first editorial decision’ decreases, the ‘Journal Impact Data’ increases and vice versa. However, an increase or decrease in the time from ‘submission to first editorial decision’ does not affect the ‘Eigenfactor Score’ of the journal and vice versa. An increase or decrease in the time from ‘submission to first post-review decision’ does not affect any ‘Journal Impact Data’ and vice versa. If the time from ‘submission to acceptance’ increases, the ‘Journal Impact Data’ (2-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Immediacy Index and Article Influence Score) also increases, and if the time from ‘submission to acceptance’ decreases, so will the ‘Journal Impact Data’. However, an increase or decrease in the time from ‘submission to acceptance’ does not affect the ‘Eigenfactor Score’ of the journal and vice versa. The study will act as a ready reference tool for the scholars to select the most appropriate submitting platforms for their scholarly endeavours. Furthermore, the performance and evaluative indicators responsible for a journal’s overall research performance can also be understood from a micro-analytical view, which will help the researchers select appropriate journals for their future scholarly submissions. Lengthy publication timelines are a big problem for the researchers because they are not able to get the credit for their research on time. Since the study validates a relationship between the ‘Peer Review Metrics’ and ‘Journal Impact Data’, the findings will be of great help in making an appropriate journal’s choice. The study can be an eye opener for the journal administrators who vocalise a speed-up publication process by enhancing certain areas of publication timeline. The study is the first of its kind that correlates the ‘Peer Review Metrics’ of the journals and the ‘Journal Impact Data’. The study’s findings are limited to the data retrieved from the ‘Nature Research’ journals and cannot be generalised to the full score of journals. The study can be extended across other publishers to generalise the findings. Even the articles’ early access availability concerning ‘Peer Review Metrics’ of the journals and the ‘Journal Impact Data’ can be studied.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Schiermeier, Quirin. "German scientists regain access to Elsevier journals." Nature, February 14, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.21482.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Cressey, Daniel. "Journals weigh up double-blind peer review." Nature, July 15, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.15564.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

"Why high-profile journals have more retractions." Nature, September 17, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.15951.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Schiermeier, Quirin. "Russian scientists cut off from Springer journals." Nature, May 21, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.17584.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Abbott, Alison. "Greek scientists lose access to digital journals." Nature, July 2, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.17908.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Baker, Monya. "Open-access index delists thousands of journals." Nature, May 9, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19871.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 1, no. 2 (November 2000): 157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35040112.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Genetics 1, no. 3 (December 2000): 243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35042101.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 1, no. 3 (December 2000): 237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35043105.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 1, no. 3 (December 2000): 221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35044570.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Genetics 2, no. 1 (January 2001): 79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35047597.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2, no. 1 (January 2001): 77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35048083.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, no. 1 (January 2001): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35049077.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Genetics 1, no. 1 (October 2000): 80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35049599.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2, no. 2 (February 2001): 157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35052105.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Genetics 2, no. 2 (February 2001): 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35052582.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, no. 2 (February 2001): 143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35053589.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Genetics 2, no. 3 (March 2001): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35056077.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2, no. 3 (March 2001): 226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35056528.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, no. 3 (March 2001): 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35058594.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Genetics 2, no. 4 (April 2001): 322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35066041.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2, no. 4 (April 2001): 315–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35067115.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, no. 4 (April 2001): 303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35067598.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Genetics 2, no. 5 (May 2001): 397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35072094.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, no. 5 (May 2001): 375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35072582.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2, no. 5 (May 2001): 397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35073104.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2, no. 6 (June 2001): 481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35073108.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Genetics 2, no. 6 (June 2001): 481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35076610.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

"Reviews and comment from Nature journals." Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, no. 6 (June 2001): 449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35077590.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

"Nature journals offer double-blind review." Nature 518, no. 7539 (February 2015): 274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/518274b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 3, no. 1 (January 2002): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm720.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 3, no. 2 (February 2002): 142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm733.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

"Reviews and comment from nature journals." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 3, no. 3 (March 2002): 221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm775.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

"Nature journals debut open-access models." Physics Today 2020, no. 2 (December 18, 2020): 1218a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.6.2.20201218a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!