Academic literature on the topic 'Natural community'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Natural community.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Natural community"
Rwekaza, Godlove Deodatus. "Community Engagement in Natural Resources Management: A Review of Community-Based Natural Resources Management to Identify its Opportunities and Challenges in Tanzania." International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews 5, no. 3 (March 21, 2024): 5889–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0324.0848.
Full textStone, Brad Lowell. "Community and Natural Law." Humanitas 10, no. 1 (1997): 99–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/humanitas19971017.
Full textKumar, Chetan. "Revisiting ‘community’ in community-based natural resource management." Community Development Journal 40, no. 3 (February 25, 2005): 275–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi036.
Full textRizal, Syamsu, Rakhmat, Suradi Tahmir, and Haedar Akib. "Natural disaster management-based model of community participation in Makassar." International Journal of Academic Research 6, no. 2 (March 30, 2014): 211–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-2/a.31.
Full textRoss, Helen, and R. W. (Bill) Carter. "Natural disasters and community resilience." Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 18, no. 1 (March 2011): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2011.568370.
Full textAllen, Kyle D., Matthew D. Whitledge, and Drew B. Winters. "Community bank liquidity: Natural disasters as a natural experiment." Journal of Financial Stability 60 (June 2022): 101002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2022.101002.
Full textKlomkul, Lampong, Phrakhrusangharak Chakkit Bhuripañño, Phrakhruwirunsutakhun, Phra Therdsak Sattindhro, and Suchat Maion. "Natural Resource Management using Participatory Process of Youth Volunteer in Community." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24, no. 04 (February 28, 2020): 2670–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i4/pr201375.
Full textScoles, Pascal. "Natural Recovery and Supportive Community Networks." Journal of Psychology & Behavior Research 3, no. 2 (March 20, 2021): p7. http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/jpbr.v3n2p7.
Full textNugroho, Puguh Setyo, Agustinus Agustinus, William William, Eko Budi Siswidiyanto, Nur Rohmah, and Zakiyatul Faizah. "NATURAL DEAF EDUCATION FOR THE COMMUNITY." Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat (Journal of Public Services) 6, no. 1 (March 29, 2022): 69–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jlm.v6i1.2022.69-76.
Full textLindell, Michael K., and Carla S. Prater. "Assessing Community Impacts of Natural Disasters." Natural Hazards Review 4, no. 4 (November 2003): 176–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176).
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Natural community"
Crooks, John G. "Organizational Restructuring: Community Response to Natural Disaster." W&M ScholarWorks, 1988. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539625486.
Full textRose, Sarah Jane. "Spider Community Response to Disturbances." The Ohio State University, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1492759846303432.
Full textBraunholtz-Speight, Timothy Herford. "Power and community in Scottish community land initiatives." Thesis, University of the Highlands and Islands, 2015. https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/portal/en/studentthesis/power-and-community-in-scottish-community-land-initiatives(7670cf12-6c48-41ef-8bdd-a5aac301873b).html.
Full textAntonioli, Marta. "Effects of natural drivers on marine prokaryotic community structure." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Trieste, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/10136.
Full textHeterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) grazing is one of the major source of prokaryotic mortality in marine ecosystems, acting as a strong selection pressure on communities. Protozoans may thus affect prokaryotic abundance and alter the diversity and the taxonomic composition of the prey community, as individual prokaryotes can develop distinct grazing-resistant mechanisms. Moreover, the microbial loop is well known to regulate carbon fluxes in surface marine environments but few studies have quantified the impact of HNF predation on prokaryotes in the dark ocean. The present work was aimed to: (1) quantify the impact of HNF predation on the deep prokaryotes biomass; (2) investigate if and how prey diversity varies in response to different predation pressure; (3) define taxonomic community composition in studied areas and identify most affected prokaryotic phylotypes by HNF grazing (4) evaluate the effects of small HNF (<3 µm), which are known to dominate nano-sized compartment and represent the main bacterivores in aquatic ecosystems, being an important link between bacteria and larger protists; (5) evidence differences in community sensitivity to grazing between surface and mesopelagic ecosystems (6) identify the main environmental drivers shaping microbial community diversity. Predation experiments were performed with surface and mesopelagic water samples collected from the Southern Adriatic and Northern Ionian basins. An additional predation experiment was set up in the North-eastern Adriatic Sea. We coupled the traditional ‘dilution method’ with high-throughput molecular analysis (ARISA and Ion Torrent/454 sequencing) to provide a quantitatively and qualitatively evaluation of the grazing process occurring in marine microbial communities. The present work is structured by four manuscripts in preparation and one manuscript already submitted. 1. Heterotrophic nanoflagellate grazing on picoplankton in deep waters (manuscript in preparation) 2. Effects of heterotrophic flagellate predation on bacterial community diversity (manuscript in preparation) 3. HNF grazing impact on taxonomic composition of marine prokaryotic community (manuscript in preparation) 4. Environmental drivers structuring surface and deep bacterial communities in Adriatic and Ionian Seas (manuscript in preparation) 5. Biodiversity changes of bacterial community under predation pressure analyzed by 16S rRNA pyrosequencing (manuscript submitted) My PhD research led to important progresses in the comprehension of microbial dynamics regulating carbon cycles and bacterial diversity in the Adriatic and Ionian basins. Prokaryotic abundance and biomass were one order of magnitude higher in the photic than in the aphotic layers of Southern Adriatic and Ionian Seas (surface biomass 1.68 ± 1.76 µC L-1, deep biomass 9.00 ± 2.11 µC L-1). The Northern Adriatic community presented the highest biomass value (57.46 µC L-1), according to its richer trophic status. All in situ communities displayed the same evenness, being dominated by rare phylotypes. Rare taxa were confirmed to represent the major contributors of microbial communities, with only a few phylotypes dominant. Mesopelagic bacterial communities were as rich and variable as surface assemblages, despite the significant biomass decrease along the water column. Natural archaeal assemblages were characterized by very low richness as we recovered only two genera (Cenarchaeum and Nitrosopumilus), while in situ bacterial communities were composed by the six major marine phyla (Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Deinococcus-Thermus), whose contribution varied according to sampling depth. Flagellates were demonstrated to efficiently control their preys (ingestion rates: 7.86-22.26 µg C L-1 in surface experiments, 0.53-10.61 µg C L-1 in deep experiments), causing important losses in the potentially produced prokaryotic biomass. Despite picoplankton and HNF abundance reduction with depth contrasts with the hypothesis that at least 108 picoplanktonic cells L-1 are necessary to sustain HNF community, our data confirm that also in mesopelagic waters prey and predator concentrations are sufficient to sustain efficient microbial food webs. HNF grazing modified bacterial community diversity in both surface and deep marine systems but with different strength. Mesopelagic communities were more sensitive to grazing impact, evidencing a bell-shaped response to the increasing ingestion rates. Moderate-high top-down control preserved or enhanced bacterial diversity, that fell at low predation. In upper communities grazing did not induce wide variations of bacterial richness and evenness, revealing to be more stable. Small HNF (<3 µm) were the dominant size fraction within flagellate communities and likely constituted the main bacterivores. After the removal of large HNF, a higher fraction of prokaryotic phylotypes was affected. Larger protists partially reduced small flagellate impact on their preys. Larger HNF had a more important role in photic systems compared to mesopelagic waters. The fraction of bacterial taxa favored or affected by predation when small HNF were the only predators more markedly varied in surface experiments, while few phylotypes changes their behavior between the two size treatments in deep experiments. Some taxa were consumed mainly by larger HNF (3-10 µm), while others were grazed by smaller ones (<3 µm). Over 50% of the predated phylotypes belonged to the rare biosphere, mainly in the surface experiments. Rare bacteria are thus not only a dormant ‘seed bank’ but constitute a fundamental component of microbial food webs and actively vector the carbon transfer toward higher trophic levels, being as important as dominant organisms. Although general patterns applicable to all communities were not found, trends of selectivity over different phylotypes were highlighted within sampling layer along the water column and between different systems. While the majority of predator-prey interactions were characteristic to specific environments, some can be considered common to different systems (e.g. Burkholderiaceae and Pseudomonadaceae were exclusively selected in all mesopelagic sites, Bacterivoracaceae were subjected to small HNF predation independently from sampling site or depth). The Southern Adriatic and Ionian basins were significantly distinguished by both the physicochemical water characteristics and the prokaryotes and protists abundance distributions. Cluster analysis based on Jaccard and Bray-Curtis metrics evidenced that depth and geographical location of sampling sites influenced bacterial community similarity. The Southern Adriatic Sea was clearly distinguished from the Ionian Sea. The Northern Adriatic samples were always separated from the others, coherently with different biotic and abiotic characteristics of the sub-basin. Additionally, temperature, chl a and O2 concentration represented important environmental drivers shaping biodiversity of bacterial communities that inhabit Adriatic and Ionian basins. In conclusion, we evidenced that heterotrophic flagellates control bacterial biomass and select certain taxa among all possible preys, grazing also on the rare ones. HNF predation thus shapes bacterial community structures, which in turn influence the ecosystem functioning. Despite the cell abundance decrease of both predators and preys reduces encounter probabilities, the dark ocean hosts complex microbial food webs, structured around three trophic levels (i.e. prokaryotes, small and large heterotrophic flagellates).
I nanoflagellati eterotrofi (HNF) costituiscono una delle principali cause di mortalità dei procarioti in ambiente marino, esercitando una forte selezione sulle comunità predate. Possono modificarne l’abbondanza cellulare e alterarne la diversità e la composizione tassonomica, in quanto le diverse specie procariotiche possono sviluppare distintivi meccanismi di resistenza alla predazione. Mentre l’impatto degli HNF sui procarioti degli acque marine superficiali è ben noto, pochi studi si sono focalizzati sullo studio degli ambienti profondi. Il presenta lavoro di dottorato è stato finalizzato a: (1) quantificare l’impatto della predazione da parte degli HNF sulla biomassa procariotica profonda; (2) capire se e come la biodiversità della comunità predata vari in risposta alla diversa pressione di predazione; (3) definire la composizione tassonomica delle comunità presenti nell’area di studio e identificare i filotipi maggiormente colpiti dalla predazione da parte degli HNF; (4) valutare il contributo dei piccolo flagellati (<3 µm), i quali costituiscono la più abbondante frazione nanoplanctonica e rappresentano i principali organismi batterivori negli ambienti acquatici; (5) evidenziare possibili differenze nella risposta alla predazione tra comunità procariotiche che vivono in acque superficiali e profonde; (6) identificare i principali fattori ambientali che modulano la diversità delle comunità microbiche. Esperimenti di predazione sono stati condotti su campioni di acqua superficiale e mesopelagica raccolti nel Mar Adriatico meridionale e nel Mar Ionio settentrionale. Un ulteriore esperimento è stato condotto nel Mar Adriatico nord-orientale. Il tradizionale metodo delle diluizioni è stato abbinato ad analisi molecolari quali elettroforesi capillare (ARISA) e sequenziamento (Ion Torrent e 454) per consentire una valutazione quali-quantitativa degli effetti della predazione sulle comunità microbiche marine. La presente tesi è costituita da quattro articoli in preparazione e un articolo già sottomesso: 1. Heterotrophic nanoflagellate grazing on picoplankton in deep waters (articolo in preparazione) 2. Effects of heterotrophic flagellate predation on bacterial community diversity (articolo in preparazione) 3. HNF grazing impact on taxonomic composition of marine prokaryotic community (articolo in preparazione) 4. Environmental drivers structuring surface and deep bacterial communities in Adriatic and Ionian Seas (articolo in preparazione) 5. Biodiversity changes of bacterial community under predation pressure analyzed by 16S rRNA pyrosequencing (articolo sottomesso) La ricerca condotta durante il mio dottorato ha portato a interessanti progressi nella comprensione delle dinamiche microbiche che regolano i cicli del carbonio e la diversità batterica nei bacini adriatico e ionico. L’abbondanza e la biomassa delle comunità procariotiche superficiali è risultata un ordine di grandezza superiore rispetto alle comunità profonde in Mar Adriatico meridionale e Mar Ionio (biomassa superficiale 9.00 ± 2.11 µC L-1, biomassa profonda 1.68 ± 1.76 µC L-1). La comunità descritta nel Mar Adriatico settentrionale è caratterizzata dai valori più elevati di biomassa (57.46 µC L-1), coerentemente con l’eutrofia del bacino. I flagellati eterotrofi hanno causando perdite significative nella biomassa procariotica in tutti gli esperimenti condotti, con tassi di ingestione pari a 7.86-22.26 µgC L-1 negli esperimenti superficiali e 0.53-10.61 µgC L-1 negli esperimenti profondi. Un’abbondanza picoplanctonica di 108 cellule L-1 è stata ipotizzata come necessaria per sostenere la comunità degli flagellati. Nonostante l’aumento della profondità comporti una riduzione dell’abbondanza del picoplancton tale da non raggiungere questa soglia, i nostri dati confermano che anche negli ambienti profondi si instaurano interazione preda-predatore sufficienti a sostenere le reti trofiche microbiche. Tutte le comunità in situ hanno mostrato la medesima distribuzione, con prevalenza di filotipi rari e pochi gruppi dominanti. Le comunità mesopelagiche presentano diversità e variabilità analoghe a quelle superficiali, nonostante il decremento in biomassa lungo la colonna d’acqua. Una bassa diversità è stata osservata nelle comunità naturali di Archea, dove sono stati rilevati due soli generi (Cenarchaeum e Nitrosopumilus), mentre le comunità batteriche sono composte dai sei principali phyla marini (Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes e Deinococcus-Thermus), la cui frequenza varia in base alla profondità di campionamento. La predazione esercitata dagli HNF ha modificato la diversità delle comunità sia superficiali che profonde ma con diversi effetti. Le comunità profonde si sono dimostrate più suscettibili alla diversa intensità della predazione. Un controllo top-down medio-alto ha preservato o incrementato la diversità batterica, che invece è risultata fortemente ridotta con bassa pressione di predazione. Al contrario, le comunità superficiali hanno subito solo leggere variazioni nella biodiversità batterica in risposta ai diversi tassi di ingestione, dimostrandosi più stabili. I piccoli flagellati (<3 µm) costituiscono la frazione dominante delle comunità nanoplanctoniche. In seguito alla rimozione dei predatori >3 µm, variazione significative dell’abbondanza sono state riscontrate in una maggiore percentuale di filotipi procariotici. Flagellati di maggiori dimensioni possono quindi mitigare l’impatto dei piccoli predatori sulle prede, con una maggior influenza nei sistemi fotici. Alcuni taxa batterici sono stati consumati prevalentemente dal grandi HNF (3-10 µm), mentre altri sono stati selezionati dai piccoli flagellati (<3 µm). Oltre il 50% dei filotipi predati apparteneva alla biosfera rara, soprattutto negli esperimenti condotti in superficie. I batteri rari (0.1-1% dell’abbondanza totale) non rappresentano quindi una frazione ‘dormiente’ il cui contributo varia in seguito a cambiamenti delle condizioni ambientali, come inizialmente ipotizzato. Costituiscono invece una componente fondamentale delle reti trofiche microbiche e contribuiscono attivamente al trasferimento di carbonio verso i livelli trofici superiori, così come gli organismi dominanti. Nonostante ciascuna comunità risponda in maniera distintiva alla predazione, in funzione della composizione tassonomica delle comunità stesse e dello stato trofico del sistema, alcuni indizi di selettività sono stati individuati. Alcune interazioni preda-predatore si sono rivelate tipiche delle comunità profonde o superficiali, mentre altre erano comuni ad entrambi i sistemi (es. Burkholderiaceae e Pseudomonadaceae sono stati selezionati sono in ambiente pelagico, Bacterivoracaceae sono stati sottoposti a predazione da parte di piccolo flagellati in tutti gli esperimenti, indipendentemente dalla profondità e dal sito di campionamento). I bacini Adriatico meridionale e Ionio settentrionale sono significativamente distinti sia per le caratteristiche chimico-fisiche della colonna d’acqua, sia per l’abbondanza di pico- e nanoplancton. La cluster analisi basata sugli indici di Jaccard e Bray-Curtis ha evidenziato che profondità di campionamento e localizzazione geografica sono i principali fattori che determinano la similarità tra le comunità batteriche. Il Mar Adriatico settentrionale è risultato sempre separato dagli altri campioni, coerentemente con le diverse caratteristiche biotiche e abiotiche del bacino. Oltre a profondità e sito geografico, temperatura, concentrazione di chl a e ossigeno contribuiscono a determinare la biodiversità batterica adriatica e ionica. In conclusione, il presente lavoro ha evidenziato come i flagellati eterotrofi controllino la biomassa procariotica e mostrino preferenza per determinati taxa, selezionando anche quelli rari. La predazione influenza la struttura delle comunità e di conseguenza il funzionamento degli ecosistemi. Anche gli ambienti marini profondi ospitano complesse reti trofiche, strutturate attorno a tre livelli principali (procarioti, piccoli e grandi flagellati eterotrofi) così come le acque superficiali.
XXVI Ciclo
1986
Miller, Mark Alan. "Exploring rural community readiness for participation in community and natural resource development extension education programs." Connect to resource, 1990. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view.cgi?acc%5Fnum=osu1261410028.
Full textDabo, Dina. "Community-based natural resource management: The case of Community Forest Management Areas in Pete, Zanzibar." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26202.
Full textHolmström, Sofia. "Furniture landscape : Building community through the natural process of wood." Thesis, Umeå universitet, Arkitekthögskolan vid Umeå universitet, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-148394.
Full textDuvall, Alison Leigh. "Towards community-owned forests landowner perspectives on the Blackfoot Community Conservation Area /." CONNECT TO THIS TITLE ONLINE, 2006. http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-02282007-150636/.
Full textLedford, Robin. "Levee Lake| A 2012 Floristic and Natural Community Survey and Analysis." Thesis, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, 2014. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1561176.
Full textLevee Lake is a forested wetland system located within a Mississippi River oxbow meander scar in the American Bottom of the Northern Section of the Lower Mississippi River Bottomlands Division (White 1978) that has not been developed or converted to agricultural land. Because of its relatively undisturbed status, Levee Lake is representative of a presettlement wetland. In 1976, Levee Lake was documented with a 93-acre Grade B shrub swamp/marsh/pond (SSMP) community, qualifying for the Illinois Natural Areas Inventory (INAI). Additionally, 129 acres of Grade C wet floodplain forest surrounding the SSMP community was recorded (Nyboer and Reeves 1976).
Nyboer and Reeves (1976) described Levee Lake as the largest complex of marsh, pond, and swamp communities representing presettlement American Bottom conditions. They also identified potential draining efforts at site perimeters. Based on regulatory agency and Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS) documents as well as historical aerial photographs, perimeter portions of the forested wetland system and adjoining properties were subjected to decades of clearing and draining efforts prior to and following the 1976 survey.
This study involved evaluating the current floristic composition, natural communities, and the overall quality of the Levee Lake wetland system. The information from the current evaluation was then compared to the 1976 survey to examine how recorded disturbances have affected the condition, communities, and quality of the Levee Lake wetland system. The hypothesis of this study was that documented clearing, draining, and subsequent hydrologic alterations would likely cause changes in plant composition and natural communities since the 1976 INAI survey.
To accomplish this task, the transect (Transect 1 or T1) that was used for vegetative sampling in 1976 was re-created and used as a benchmark for 2012 vegetative sampling. To compare the plant composition from 1976 to 2012, twenty 0.25 meter (m)2 sampling plots were established along Transect 1. At each plot (T1P1 through T1P20), the relative cover of each vascular plant species was recorded and the resulting species data evaluated. To provide additional plant data for the site, herbaceous, shrub, and tree sampling was conducted via the Critical Trends Assessment Program (CTAP) protocols. Vegetative sampling was conducted in late summer/fall of 2012.
To evaluate the overall plant quality of Levee Lake and the existing natural communities, existing vegetation outside of the aforementioned transects was also recorded in late summer/fall of 2012. The overall site conditions and natural communities were observed and recorded during site visits in 2011, 2012, and 2014. The current natural communities were determined by the vegetative sampling, the overall site observations, as well as available aerial photographs and images.
Based on the research and field work, the native plant composition suffered a reduction in quality. Additionally, communities suffered a reduction in quality and a shift in community type. A reduction in water levels caused severe woody encroachment of the SSMP community identified in 1976. Today, only approximately 0.58-acre [0.23 hectare (ha)] of Grade C marsh/pond community remains. In 1976, the pond community was considered an exceptional feature with the surrounding shrub swamp/marsh community considered a significant feature. Although most of the former 93-acre Grade B SSMP community suffered from severe woody encroachment, recent wetland restorations to the north and to the south appear to have aided in returning hydrology to this community. Herbaceous, shrub, and tree vegetation data collected in the CTAP plots provided further evidence of wetland and swamp conditions. The former SSMP community has evolved into a Grade C swamp/marsh/pond (SMP) community. An approximate 11.73-acre (4.75 ha) Grade D marsh/wet meadow has evolved in the southwestern region that was subjected to decades of clearing and draining disturbance (White 1978; White and Madany 1978). Further evidence of a shift in plant composition and communities between species along Transect 1 in 1976 and in 2012 was shown through the NMDS ordination and an ANOSIM test which showed that plot communities distinctly differ between the two years (Minchin 2013). (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
Elliot, Alison Margaret. "Chronic pain in the community : its prevalence, impact and natural history." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2000. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.325226.
Full textBooks on the topic "Natural community"
Ride, Anouk, and Diane Bretherton, eds. Community Resilience in Natural Disasters. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230339323.
Full textDi, Bretherton, ed. Community resilience in natural disasters. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Find full textP, Mishra G., Bajpai Brijesh K, and Giri Institute of Development Studies., eds. Community participation in natural resource management. Jaipur: Rawat Publications, 2001.
Find full textNamibia. Ministry of Environment and Tourism., ed. Community-Based Natural Resource Management Programme. [Windhoek]: Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Republic of Namibia, 1996.
Find full textMassachusetts. Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Natural community work of the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. [Westborough, MA]: Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Mass. Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, 1988.
Find full textL, DeVelice Robert, and Montana Natural Heritage Program, eds. MTNHP site and community survey manual. 9th ed. Helena, MT: Montana Natural Heritage Program, 1991.
Find full textUnited States. Natural Resources Conservation Service, ed. NRCS urban & community assistance: --balancing community development and natural resource conservation. Champaign, Ill: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1995.
Find full textUnited States. Natural Resources Conservation Service, ed. NRCS urban & community assistance: --balancing community development and natural resource conservation. Champaign, Ill: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1995.
Find full textUnited States. Natural Resources Conservation Service, ed. NRCS urban & community assistance: --balancing community development and natural resource conservation. Champaign, Ill: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1995.
Find full textKumar, Santosh. Challenges to community based natural resource management. Anand: Institute of Rural Management, 2006.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Natural community"
Ranke, Ulrich. "Community Awareness and Participation." In Natural Disaster Risk Management, 409–48. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20675-2_9.
Full textNelson, Geoffrey, and Isaac Prilleltensky. "Community Psychology, the Natural Environment and Global Climate Change." In Community Psychology, 498–516. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-37008-1_23.
Full textNelessen, Anton C. "Vision for Natural LandscapesAbstract." In Community Visioning for Place Making, 100–106. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003108719-8.
Full textHartwell, William T. "Community Management of Natural Hazards." In Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, 112–17. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_72.
Full textRoka, Krishna. "Community-Based Natural Resources Management." In Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 161–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95981-8_18.
Full textRoka, Krishna. "Community-Based Natural Resources Management." In Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 1–14. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_18-1.
Full textHallgren, Lars. "Reframing conflict in natural resource management." In Environmental Communication and Community, 16–30. New York, NY : Routledge, 2016.: Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315691176-2.
Full textLortz, Peter. "Service-Learning in the Natural Sciences." In Life, Learning, and Community, 109–25. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003445753-13.
Full textSchmidt, Robert W., and Sharon L. Cohen. "Natural and Human-Caused Disasters." In Disaster Mental Health Community Planning, 107–24. New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429285134-6.
Full textRoper, R. E. "The Natural Controls of Coexistence." In The Individual and the Community, 115–22. London: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003480570-14.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Natural community"
Mieskes, Margot, Karën Fort, Aurélie Névéol, Cyril Grouin, and Kevin Cohen. "NLP Community Perspectives on Replicability." In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing. Incoma Ltd., Shoumen, Bulgaria, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_089.
Full textMuhamad, Muhamad. "The Natural Tourism Landscape of The Mount Sumbing Slope." In 3rd International Conference on Community Engagement and Education for Sustainable Development. AIJR Publisher, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.151.31.
Full textSaraswaty, Amrita Nugraheni, Maryunani, Sri Muljaningsih, and Putu Mahardika Adi Saputra. "Community Water Literacy of Sacred Natural Sites." In Brawijaya International Conference on Economics, Business and Finance 2021 (BICEBF 2021). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220128.022.
Full textGinting, Herlina, and Junita Setiana Ginting. "Okup Tradition on Karo Community." In International Conference on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0009899700002480.
Full textLhoest, Quentin, Albert Villanova del Moral, Yacine Jernite, Abhishek Thakur, Patrick von Platen, Suraj Patil, Julien Chaumond, et al. "Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processing." In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-demo.21.
Full textOliveira, Tatyana B. S. de, and Liang Zhao. "Complex Network Community Detection Based on Swarm Aggregation." In 2008 Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation. IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icnc.2008.324.
Full textKumar, Rakesh, Meenu Gupta, and S. Rubina Sapra. "Speech to text Community Application using Natural Language Processing." In 2021 5th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iscon52037.2021.9702428.
Full textChowdhury, Md Towhidul Absar, and Naveen Sharma. "Community Asset Ontology for Modeling Community Data using Information Extraction." In NLPIR 2022: 2022 6th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3582768.3582778.
Full textAdriyanti, Dwi Tyaningsih, Aswati Mindaryani, Agus Prasetya, Himawan Tri Bayu Murti Petrus, Vincent Sutresno Hadi Sujoto, Mukmin Sapto Pamungkas, and Tri Winarni S. Putri. "Development of Small-Scale Charcoal Briquettes and Natural Dyes Production Units to Implement Zero-Waste System through Utilizing Mangrove Forests." In 3rd International Conference on Community Engagement and Education for Sustainable Development. AIJR Publisher, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.151.18.
Full textHidayah, Nurulia, Karen Slamet Hardjo, Ahmad Baidlowi, and Tiara Uji Lishianawati. "Assistance to Strengthen Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Sanggrahan Village, Kranggan District,Temanggung Regency, Central Java." In 3rd International Conference on Community Engagement and Education for Sustainable Development. AIJR Publisher, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.151.38.
Full textReports on the topic "Natural community"
Research Institute (IFPRI), International Food Policy. Natural Resource Conflicts and Community Organizations in Bangladesh. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/capriwp111.
Full textJin, Xin, Jeff Maguire, Michael Blonsky, Prateek Munankarmi, and Phil Markham. Final Report: Natural Gas Community of the Future. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1959301.
Full textThorne, Sarah, Daniel Kovacs, Joseph Gailani, and Burton Suedel. Informing the community engagement framework for natural and nature-based projects : an annotated review of leading stakeholder and community engagement practices. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/45400.
Full textManioli, Julia, Patrick Pikacha, and Brian Weeks. Tetepare: Community Conservation in Melanesia. American Museum of Natural History, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5531/cbc.ncep.0019.
Full textSiebers, A., S. Singer, and M. Thelen. Analyzing the Structure and Function of Novel Cytochromes from a Natural Microbial Community. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/900122.
Full textSparti, Chelsi, Peter Larsen, and Tyler Huntington. The Value of Sharing and Consolidating Critical Community, Electricity, and Natural Hazard Information. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/2234026.
Full textJourneay, M., J. Z. K. Yip, C. L. Wagner, P. LeSueur, and T. Hobbs. Social vulnerability to natural hazards in Canada. Natural Resources Canada/CMSS/Information Management, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/330295.
Full textMcDonald, Philip M., and Gary O. Fiddler. Development of a mixed shrub–ponderosa pine community in a natural and treated condition. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/psw-rp-224.
Full textSmith, W. P., M. J. Stotts, B. A. Andres, J. M. Melton, A. Garibaldi, and K. Boggs. Bird, mammal, and vegetation community surveys of research natural areas in the Tongass National Forest. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/pnw-rp-535.
Full textSafford, Thomas, Megan Henly, and Jessica Ulrich. Jobs, natural resources, and community resilience: A survey of southeast Alaskans about social and environmental change. University of New Hampshire Libraries, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.148.
Full text