Academic literature on the topic 'Nationalism – Serbia and Montenegro'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Nationalism – Serbia and Montenegro.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Nationalism – Serbia and Montenegro"
Hayden, Robert M. "Constitutional Nationalism in the Formerly Yugoslav Republics." Slavic Review 51, no. 4 (1992): 654–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2500130.
Full textBiserko, Sonya. "HEGEMONIC NATIONALIST MATRICES OF THE PAST AND THE FUTURE OF THE BALKANS." Urgent Problems of Europe, no. 2 (2021): 84–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.31249/ape/2021.02.04.
Full textJagiełło-Szostak, Anna. "Nacjonalizm w przemówieniach Slobodana Miloševicia." Sprawy Narodowościowe, no. 41 (February 13, 2022): 223–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.11649/sn.2012.030.
Full textAsaturov, Sergey, and Andrei Martynov. "THE RESURGENCE OF NATIONALISM: THE BREAKUP OF YUGOSLAVIA." EUREKA: Social and Humanities, no. 5 (October 11, 2020): 39–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2020.001440.
Full textJovanović, Srđan M. "The Discursive Creation of the ‘Montenegrin Language’ and Montenegrin Linguistic Nationalism in the 21st Century." Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies 13, no. 1 (December 1, 2018): 67–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/auseur-2018-0005.
Full textHouliston, Linda, Stanislav Ivanov, and Craig Webster. "Nationalism in Official Tourism Websites of Balkan Countries." Tourism 69, no. 1 (March 27, 2021): 83–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.37741/t.69.1.7.
Full textArcher, Rory. "“Antibureaucratism” as a Yugoslav Phenomenon: The View from Northwest Croatia." Nationalities Papers 47, no. 4 (July 2019): 562–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/nps.2018.40.
Full textĐurović, Tatjana, and Nadežda Silaški. "Metaphors we vote by." Journal of Language and Politics 9, no. 2 (July 15, 2010): 237–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.2.04dur.
Full textCeribašić, Naila, Ana Hofman, and Ljerka Vidić Rasmussen. "Post-Yugoslavian Ethnomusicologies in Dialogue." Yearbook for Traditional Music 40 (2008): 33–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s074015580001208x.
Full textNedeljković, Saša. "Masculinity as an Alternative Parameter of Ethnic Identity: Montenegrins in the Village of Lovćenac." Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 5, no. 1 (February 19, 2010): 51–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i1.3.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Nationalism – Serbia and Montenegro"
Vaschenko, Vitalii. "Analysis of the modern inter-ethnic conflict : case study of Kosovo /." Thesis, Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2004. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/04Mar%5FVaschenko.pdf.
Full textThesis advisor(s): Donald Abenheim. Includes bibliographical references (p. 65-67). Also available online.
Tarquinto, Michael S. "Serbia and Montenegro : together forever or one-night stand? /." Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2005. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/05Jun%5FTarquinto.pdf.
Full textThesis Advisor(s): John Leslie, Stephen Garrett. Includes bibliographical references (p. 71-79). Also available online.
Ardolic, Mimoza. "Kosovo & Montenegro : Why Different Outcomes?" Thesis, Växjö University, School of Social Sciences, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:vxu:diva-1911.
Full textAbstract
University of Växjö, School of Social Sciences
Course: PO 5363, Political Science
Title: Kosovo & Montenegro – Why Different Outcomes?
Author: Mimoza Ardolic
Supervisor: Lennart Bergfeldt
Date: 2008-01-15
The purpose of this study has been to assess why the pursuit for independence turned out to be a matter of such difficulty in the case of Kosovo and not in Montenegro, seeing as they are two apparent similar cases.
The research questions are:
How can it be that two analogous situations where two regions (Kosovo and Montenegro), quite similar in several aspects, want independence from the same country (Serbia) result in so different outcomes?
Why has Kosovo’s attempt to achieve self-government been such a difficulty?
Why did Montenegro manage to achieve autonomy without (great) difficulties?
The findings are that despite the similarity between these two cases, they have ample differing characteristics as well. The factors detected are that whilst the Kosovo conflict is characterized by: a troublesome history, no common ground, an existing deep hatred, Russian opposition and the nationalist Milošević; the Montenegrin case is set apart by: an intertwining, rather peaceful history, friendly relations, Russian cordiality and the nationalist Djukanović.
The interpretation of these elements according to the nationalist theory is as follows: Milošević and Djukanović (and their ideology: nationalism) are the real causes. The other elements are mere means to their ambition for nation building. The difference between these two men and the elements (their means) explains the different outcomes in the two cases.
Vladisavljevic, Nebosa. "Serbia in turmoil : the collapse of Communism, mobilization and nationalism." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.415502.
Full textBozeva-Abazi, Katrin. "The shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian national identities, 1800s-1900s." Thesis, McGill University, 2003. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=19473.
Full textAsplund, Malin. "The Legitimacy of Secession and the Case of Montenegro." Thesis, Jönköping University, JIBS, Political Science, 2007. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-667.
Full textRätten till självbestämmande har traditionellt sett inneburit att staters suveränitet respekterats. Konceptet har dock kommit att applicerats på andra plan i större utsträckning, då man har argumenterat för rätten till nationellt självbestämmande. En gemensam kultur, eller liknande, har på så vis fungerat som underlag för secessionsrörelser. Secession kan ha allvarliga konsekvenser för de involverade politiska enheterna. Det kan även vara ett koncept svårt att implementera i verkligheten då det berör territoriella aspekter såväl som ifrågasätter vilka som hör till den utbrytande rörelsen. En teoretisk ram användbar för utvärdering av secession har därför sammanställts i denna uppsats, baserad på tre typer av secessionsteorier som applicerats på och jämförts med fallet Montenegro. Ramen bygger på en teoretisk diskussion rörande definitioner av nationalism, nationer och identitet. Dessa definitioner grundas på en civil och medborgerlig förståelse av nationalism, där identitet beskrivs som en dynamisk företeelse. Secessionsramen har därefter applicerats på fallet Montenegro som nyligen blivit en självständig stat. En utvärdering av fallet har sedan bedrivits, baserad på en historisk översikt av landet. För att understryka komplexiteten med secession presenteras sedan argument mot secession som inte bör betraktas som en lösning på etniska konflikter. Alternativa lösningar på sådana presenteras därefter vilket ger en insikt i multiculturalism. Sådana lösningar innebär alla en risk för att etniska gränser etsas fast istället för löses upp. Montenegros secession kan dock betraktas som legitim då relativts stabila demokratiska och liberala institutioner gått att finna även innan secessionen. Folkomröstningen var även den legitim och influerad av medborgarskap snarare än etnicitet.
The principle of self-determination traditionally refers to respect for state sovereignty. It has been increasingly employed to lower level communities as they have argued their right to national self-determination. National groups have, based on a common culture or likewise, made claims to secession. Secession can have severe consequences for either one of the two political units. It can also be extremely difficult to implement as it involves territorial aspects and the fundamental question of who belongs to the national group wishing to secede. A framework for evaluating the legitimacy of secession is developed in this thesis, based on three general types of secession theories applied and compared to the case of Montenegro. The framework builds upon a theoretical background defining what is meant by nationalism, nations and identity. The language used in this essay is therefore that of constructivism, rooted in the civic idea of nationalism. The belief that human identities are dynamic and subject to change is a crucial assumption. With the aid of an historical presentation of Montenegro, an evaluation of the region’s independence is made. To underline why secession should be implemented with care, arguments against secession are then presented. Secession should not be confused with a solution to ethnical tensions. Alternatives to secession are thus demonstrated, showing the complexity of the multiculturalist field in general. Multicultural policies risk fixing ethnical lines rather than dissolving them. The secession of Montenegro is legitimate as relatively stable democratic and liberal tradition existed prior to independence. The referendum in Montenegro was, more over, determined by a well organised referendum where civil elements dominated over
Kissopoulos, Lisa. "Nationalist Conflict and Elite Manipulation in Serbia and India." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2007. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1186753678.
Full textMerry, Adrienne. "Socio-cultural aspects of functional regionalization in the cross-border area between Montenegro, Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia and Serbia (SCAFRB)." Thesis, Lille, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018LIL1A025.
Full textNew social-economic macro-regionalization in the Central Balkans, leading to accelerating the pace of economic growth in the monitored area, is both necessary and possible. From a review of the literature it is clear that in the view of most western democracies the Central Balkans still remains the most unstable region in the western world. Functional regionalization of the Balkans is a developmental enigma for the Balkans as well as for Europe. Secondly, for Europe, the challenge is to form a functioning community originally in an area composed of a number of different national communities that have recently been in the most harmful national conflict. The challenge of local government community is how best to construct a viable transition from a dysfunctional socio-cultural community to an integrated functional global socio-cultural system.The study analyses the strengths and weaknesses of a particular Balkan area, the Shaar Mountains area, and the possibilities to set up trans-borders cooperation between several cities in order to enhance socio-economic development. Several projects the author has participated to are presented. The stakes are high, and the challenges still uncertain
Guzina, Dejan. "Nationalism in the context of an illiberal multination state, the case of Serbia." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2000. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ52322.pdf.
Full textGuzina, Dejan Carleton University Dissertation Political Science. "Nationalism in the context of an illiberal multination state; the case of Serbia." Ottawa, 2000.
Find full textBooks on the topic "Nationalism – Serbia and Montenegro"
Saviours of the nation: Serbia's intellectual opposition and the revival of nationalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2003.
Find full textSerbia and Montenegro. New York: Facts On File, 2004.
Find full textSerbia and Montenegro. New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2004.
Find full textEconomist Intelligence Unit (Great Britain). Yugoslavia (Serbia-Montenegro) 1998-99. London: Economist Intelligence Unit, 1998.
Find full textSerbia and Montenegro in pictures. Minneapolis: Twenty-First Century Books, 2007.
Find full textMarat, Terterov, ed. Doing business with Serbia & Montenegro. 2nd ed. Sterling, VA: GMB Pub. Limited, 2006.
Find full textThey would never hurt a fly: War criminals on trial in The Hague. London: Abacus, 2004.
Find full textThey would never hurt a fly: War criminals on trial in The Hague. New York: Viking, 2004.
Find full textJovanović, Aleksandra. Transition report for Serbia and Montenegro. Belgrade: G17 Institute, 2005.
Find full textMarat, Terterov, ed. Doing business with Serbia and Montenegro. London and Sterling, VA: Kogan Page, 2004.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Nationalism – Serbia and Montenegro"
Kostadinov, Stanimir, Miodrag Zlatić, Nada Dragović, and Zoran Gavrilović. "Serbia and Montenegro." In Soil Erosion in Europe, 271–77. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470859202.ch22.
Full textTurner, Barry. "Serbia and Montenegro." In The Statesman’s Yearbook 2005, 1410–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230271333_257.
Full textTurner, Barry. "Serbia and Montenegro." In The Statesman’s Yearbook, 1418–32. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230271340_261.
Full textTurner, Barry. "Serbia and Montenegro." In The Statesman’s Yearbook 2007, 1081–90. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230271357_263.
Full textSamardžić, Slobodan, and Duško Lopandić. "Serbia and Montenegro." In The Impact of EU Accession on the Legal Orders of New EU Member States and (Pre-)Candidate Countries, 143–77. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-465-3_5.
Full textZečević, Nada, and Nenad Ristović. "Classical Reception in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro." In A Handbook to Classical Reception in Eastern and Central Europe, 327–35. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118832813.ch27.
Full textWilliamson, Samuel R. "The Monarchy’s Enemies: Serbia, Montenegro and the Triple Entente." In Austria-Hungary and the Origins of the First World War, 100–120. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21163-0_7.
Full textLuis Díez Plaza, César. "Lectorados de español en Serbia y Montenegro (1991–2019)." In Хиспанско наслеђе у мултикултуралном свету, 459–75. Београд: Филолошки факултет Универзитета у Београду, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18485/legado_hispanico.2020.ch22.
Full textZuber, Christina Isabel, and Jelena Džankić. "Serbia and Montenegro. From Centralization to Secession and Multi-ethnic Regionalism." In Regional and National Elections in Eastern Europe, 207–38. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51787-6_9.
Full textFoster, Stephanie, and Filip Hostiuc. "Validation of NICS in Exercises – Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro and North Macedonia." In NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, 53–67. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2142-2_5.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Nationalism – Serbia and Montenegro"
Šćepanović, Mihailo. "OGLUŠENjE O SRPSKI JEZIK." In IDENTITETSKE promene: srpski jezik i književnost u doba tranzicije. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Edaucatin in Jagodina, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/zip21.187q.
Full textDonia, Robert. "The Forgotten Thousands: The Historiography of World War II Rescues of Allied Airmen in Yugoslavia." In Međunaordna naučno-kulturološka konferencija “Istoriografija o BiH (2001–2017 )”. Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5644/pi2020.186.11.
Full textKaličanin, Kristina, Ivica Terzić, Piotr Luty, and Branko Barjaktarović. "Concentration Level in the Banking Industry: Serbia, Croatia and Montenegro." In FINIZ 2022. Belgrade, Serbia: Singidunum University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.15308/finiz-2022-9-14.
Full textMarkovic, Vera. "IEEE in Serbia and Montenegro — A 46 year-long history." In 2017 6th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/meco.2017.7977121.
Full textGökçek Karaca, Nuray, and Semra Saruç. "International Migration Trends in Turkey and European Union Candidate Transition Economies." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c05.00871.
Full textDimkić, Dejan, Marko Babalj, Darko Kovač, and Mira Papović. "Non-Revenue Water in Water Supply Systems of Serbia and Montenegro." In EWaS5. Basel Switzerland: MDPI, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022021010.
Full textTorabi, Roham, Nikola Sahovic, Sandy Rodrigues, Herlander Mata-Lima, and F. Morgado-Dias. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of roof-top PV systems in Montenegro and Serbia." In 2016 4th International Symposium on Environmental Friendly Energies and Applications (EFEA). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/efea.2016.7748773.
Full textFreudenstein, Frederik, Peter M. Wiedemann, Milica Pejanovic-Djurisic, Mladen Koprivica, and Aleksandar Neskovic. "Intuitive exposure and risk perception of RF EMF: Case studies Serbia and Montenegro." In 2014 22nd Telecommunications Forum Telfor (TELFOR). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/telfor.2014.7034344.
Full textBožić, Mirjana. "Actions to Improve Physics Education in Serbia and Montenegro and to Celebrate the World Year of Physics." In WOMEN IN PHYSICS: 2nd IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics. AIP, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2128309.
Full textVidas-Bubanja, Marijana, and Iva Bubanja. "The future of digital economy in some SEE countries (Case study: Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina)." In 2016 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mipro.2016.7522379.
Full textReports on the topic "Nationalism – Serbia and Montenegro"
Schuch, Klaus. Patterns of Geographical Mobility of Researchers from Six Western Balkan Countries in Regional and European Mobility Based Training Programmes. Fteval - Austrian Platform for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2021.516.
Full text