Journal articles: 'Nasojejunal feeding'

1

Salinas, James, and Charbel Sandroussi. "Stubborn nasojejunal feeding tube." ANZ Journal of Surgery 85, no. 5 (January 19, 2015): 390–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.12944.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

de Boer, Nanne K. H., Anton Jansen, and Willem A. Marsman. "An Immovable Nasojejunal Feeding Tube." Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 8, no. 6 (June 2010): A24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.09.035.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Sivkov, O. G., A. O. Sivkov, I. B. Popov, and E. Yu Zaitsev. "Efficacy of Nasogastric and Nasojejunal Enteral Feeding in the Early Phase of Acute Pacreatitis." General Reanimatology 17, no. 6 (December 18, 2021): 27–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2021-6-27-32.

Full text

Abstract:

Enteral nutrition in the early phase of predicted severe acute pancreatitis can be administered via a nasogastric or nasojejunal tube. Finding the most effective method in terms of daily balance, the volume of feeding and residual gastric volume in the early period of moderate and severe acute pancreatitis is a current challenge.The aim of the study was to estimate the efficacy of nasogastric and nasojejunal early enteral feeding duringthe early phase of predicted severe acute pancreatitis.Material and methods. The study was prospective, single-center, and randomized. The data were collected from November 2012 to October 2018. The study included 64 ICU patients in the early period of acute pancreatitis exhibiting predictors of severity. During randomization, the patients were assigned to either nasogastric (group 1) or nasojejunal (group 2) feeding for the next four days. The volume of enteral feeding on Day 1 was 250 ml/day, and on each successive day it was increased by 250 ml/day. During group allocation, the disease severity and the way of nutrient administration were taken into account. Daily balance was calculated using the difference between enterally administered and residual gastric volume. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.23 software package. The null hypothesis was rejected at P0.05.Results. The volume of enteral nutrition administered over 4 days did not differ between the study groups. Patients with severe acute pancreatitis had significantly better nutrient absorption over 4 days when the postpyloric route was used (1.63±0.98 l/d) vs the nasogastric one (0.55±0.29 l/d) (P=0.001). In moderate pancreatitis, the enteral nutrition absorption over 4 days did not differ (P=0.107) between the groups with nasogastric (2.06±0.87 l/day) and nasojejunal (2.6±0.45 l/day) feeding.Conclusion. Nasojejunal route is the preferred way to start enteral feeding in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. In moderate acute pancreatitis, feeding can be initiated via the gastric route and only in case of intolerance it should be switched to the nasojejunal one.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Gurjar, Mohan, BhaskarP Rao, and Afzal Azim. "Unusual obstruction of nasojejunal feeding tube." Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology 15, no. 4 (2009): 288. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.56092.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Ranjithatharsini, M., K. I. Deen, S. K. Kumarage, C. A, H. Liyanage, R. C. Siriwardana, and B. Gunathilake. "Nasojejunal feeding versus feeding jejunostomy after upper gastrointestinal surgery." Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery 32, no. 2 (September 3, 2014): 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/sljs.v32i2.7353.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Campbell, Scott Ayers, and Catherine A. Daley. "Endoscopically Assisted Nasojejunal Feeding Tube Placement: Technique and Results in Five Dogs." Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 47, no. 4 (July 1, 2011): e50-e55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5326/jaaha-ms-5514.

Full text

Abstract:

Interest in noninvasive feeding tube placement in companion animals led to the adaption of a human technique utilizing endoscopy to place nasojejunal feeding tubes. Data from medical records in which nasojejunal feeding tubes were attempted were reviewed. Feeding tubes were attempted and successfully placed in five dogs within a median of 35 min. Feeding tubes remained in place for approximately 7 days. Complications included facial irritation (5/5), sneezing (5/5), fractured facial sutures (4/5), vomiting (3/5), diarrhea (3/5), crimping of feeding tube (3/5), regurgitation (1/5), epistaxis (1/5), clogging of the feeding tube (2/5), and oral migration with premature removal of the feeding tube (1/5). The deployment technique used in this study was found to be cumbersome. Despite minor complications, endoscopy can be used to rapidly and accurately place nasoenteric feeding devices.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Guo, Ding Y., and Peter M. Hewitt. "Retained nasojejunal feeding tube: a cautionary tale." ANZ Journal of Surgery 76, no. 9 (September 2006): 866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03883.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Cardoza, J. D., and R. B. Jeffrey. "Nasojejunal feeding tube placement in immobile patients." Radiology 166, no. 3 (March 1988): 893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.166.3.3124206.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Pattwell, M., R. Eckersley, L. White, L. Fixter, and A. Rochford. "Is nasojejunal feeding as effective as we think? An evaluation of nasojejunal feeding in the Intensive Care Unit." Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 48 (April 2022): 499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.02.056.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Gounaris, A., F. Anatolitou, C. Costalos, and E. Konstantellou. "Minimal Enteral Feeding, Nasojejunal Feeding and Gastrin Levels in Premature Infants." Acta Paediatrica 79, no. 2 (February 1990): 226–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1990.tb11443.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Marshall, Christopher, Wahid Wassef, Nicholas Smyrnios, and Gisele Leblanc. "Nasojejunal Feeding in Pancreatitis: A Single Center Experience." American Journal of Gastroenterology 106 (October 2011): S74. http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201110002-00188.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Lecleire, Stéphane, Michel Antonietti, Emmanuel Ben-Soussan, Marylène Zenoni, Guillaume Savoye, Odile Goria, Philippe Ducrotté, and Eric Lerebours. "Nasojejunal Feeding in Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis." Pancreas 35, no. 4 (November 2007): 376–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mpa.0000297826.98053.37.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Rollins, Hazel. "Nasojejunal tube feeding in children: knowledge and practice." British Journal of Community Nursing 23, Sup7 (July 2018): S7—S12. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2018.23.sup7.s7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

DAVIDBOHLER, J. "Placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes: an alternate technique." American Journal of Gastroenterology 97, no. 9 (September 2002): S288—S289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9270(02)05361-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Vaisman, N., R. Kaidar, I. Levin, and J. B. Lessing. "Nasojejunal feeding in hyperemesis gravidarum—a preliminary study." Clinical Nutrition 23, no. 1 (February 2004): 53–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0261-5614(03)00088-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Bashir, R. Martin, Harminder Sandhu, and Daniel Herr. "Nasal Bridling of Endoscopically Placed Nasojejunal Feeding Tubes." American Journal of Gastroenterology 101 (September 2006): S534—S535. http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/00000434-200609001-01399.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Sivkov, O. G., A. O. Sivkov, I. B. Popov, and E. U. Zaitsev. "Peculiarities of nasogastric and nasojejunal feeding during the early period of acute severe pancreatitis." Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery 180, no. 6 (May 25, 2022): 56–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2021-180-6-56-61.

Full text

Abstract:

The OBJECTIVE of the study was to identify factors independently influencing intolerance to early enteral feeding via a nasogastric and nasojejunal tube in patients during the early phase of severe acute pancreatitis.METHODS AND MATERIALS. An open, randomized, controlled, cohort study was carried out. Out of 64 patients with predictors of severe acute pancreatitis, a cohort with severe form was isolated, in which 16 patients received nasogastric and 15 patients – nasojejunal feeding. The enteral feeding intolerance criteria were: discharge via the nasogastric tube >500ml at a time or >500ml/day compared to total enteral feeding administered during 24 hours, intensified pain syndrome, abdominal distension, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Indicators featuring prognostic significance were identified using the logistic regression technique. The null hypothesis was rejected at p<0.05.RESULTS. The presented findings demonstrate that a more severe multiple organ failure (SOFA – OR – 1.283, 95 % CI 1.029–1.6, p=0.027), the operative day (OR – 4.177, 95 % CI 1.542–11.313, p=0.005) increase while the nasojejunal route of nutrients delivery decreases (OR – 0.193, 95 % CI 0.08–0.4591, p≤0.001) the incidence of large residual stomach volumes. Postpyloric feeding reduces the risk of developing pain syndrome (OR – 0.191, 95 % CI 0.088–0.413, p≤0.001), abdominal distension (OR – 0.420, 95 % CI 0.203–0.870, p=0.002), nausea and vomiting (OR – 0.160, 95 % CI 0.069–0.375, p≤0.001).CONCLUSION. During severe acute pancreatitis, multiple organ dysfunction, the nasogastric route of enteral feeding delivery, and the fact of a surgery increase independently the risk of developing large residual stomach volumes. In case of severe acute pancreatitis, the nasogastric route of nutrients administration increases the development of such manifestations of enteral feeding intolerance as nausea, vomiting, pain intensification, and abdominal distension. In patients with severe acute pancreatitis, the nasoejunal route of administration of nutrients is preferable.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Silk, D. B. A. "Formulation of enteral diets for use in jejunal enteral feeding." Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 67, no. 3 (May 23, 2008): 270–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0029665108007155.

Full text

Abstract:

Nasogastric enteral feeding is not tolerated in patients with gastric atony and in many critically-ill patients in whom gastric emptying may be delayed and in whom gastro-oesophageal regurgitation may lead to pulmonary aspiration of enteral feed and the development of pneumonia. Initial attempts to overcome these problems led to the development of post pyloric enteral feeding techniques with the infusion port of the tubes positioned in the duodenum. In many centres this technique is still the most practised post-pyloric enteral feeding technique. Nasoduodenal feeding tubes often retroperistalse into the stomach. The technique of choice, therefore, in these difficult patients is to position the infusion port of the feeding tube well distal to the ligament of trietz (post ligament of trietz nasojejunal enteral tube feeding). While nasogastric and nasoduodenal enteral feeding techniques have been shown to elicit a stimulatory exocrine pancreatic response, distal jejunal enteral feeding does not. During this mode of feeding the ileal brake is activated and pancreatic exocrine pancreatic secretion inhibited by the action of the released peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide-1 hormones, in turn the inhibition of pancreatic secretion being the result of inhibition of trypsin secretion. In the light of the findings showing the absence of a stimulatory pancreatic exocrine response to nasojejunal enteral feeding these patients should receive a predigested rather than a polymeric enteral diet.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Burns, D. L., S. E. Schaefer, and J. J. Bosco. "Nutritional assessment of endoscopically placed nasojejunal feeding tubes (NJFT)." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 41, no. 4 (April 1995): 361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(05)80299-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Patrick, P. G., D. F. Kirby, and M. H. Delegge. "Outcome study on nasojejunal feeding in critically ill patients." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 41, no. 4 (April 1995): 370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(05)80335-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Brandt, C. P., and E. A. Mittendorf. "Endoscopic placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in ICU patients." Surgical Endoscopy 13, no. 12 (December 1999): 1211–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/pl00009623.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Nadesalingam, V., D. Chatterjee, N. Ockwell, and D. Gertner. "Nasojejunal feeding: A District Hospital Experience and Complication rates." Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 35 (February 2020): 237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.12.066.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Tatsumi, Hiroomi, Masayuki Akatsuka, Satoshi Kazuma, Yoichi Katayama, Yuya Goto, Kyoko Monma, Shinichiro Yoshida, and Yoshiki Masuda. "Endoscopic Insertion of Nasojejunal Feeding Tube at Bedside for Critically Ill Patients: Relationship between Tube Position and Intragastric Countercurrent of Contrast Medium." Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 75, no. 3 (2019): 163–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000502676.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and Oblectives: We evaluated the success rate of endoscopically positioned nasojejunal feeding tubes and the intragastric countercurrent of contrast medium thereafter. Method: This retrospective observational study investigated patients who were admitted to a single intensive care unit and required endoscopic placement of a post-pyloric feeding tube between January 2010 and June 2016. The feeding tube was grasped with forceps via a transoral endoscope and inserted into the duodenum or jejunum. Thereafter, we assessed the position of the tube and the intragastric countercurrent using abdominal radiography with contrast medium. Results: The tube tip was inserted at the jejunum and the duodenal fourth portion in 55.8 and 33.6% of patients, respectively. The tip of the inserted tube had moved into the jejunum of 71.7% of patients by the following day. The countercurrent rate was significantly lower among patients with a tube inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal than among those with tubes inserted more proximally (8.4 vs. 45.4%, p = 0.0022). Conclusions: The endoscopic insertion and positioning of a nasojejunal feeding tube seemed effective because the rate of tube insertion into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal was about 90%. The findings of intragastric countercurrents indicated that feeding tubes should be inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or beyond to prevent vomiting and the aspiration of enteral nutrients.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Bharti, Laxmi K., Jai Kishun, and Basant Kumar. "Nutrition status and outcome in children with acute pancreatitis." International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 7, no. 7 (June 24, 2020): 1458. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20202579.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: AP (Acute Pancreatitis) in children is being more and more diagnosed across the world and developing nation like India. This may be because of multiple factors like better health sector developments, change in dietary and social lifestyle changes due to fast improving economy. There are lots of unknown factors also leading to increase in incidence of AP in children in developing nations like India.Methods: Five-year retrospective data of AP patients admitted Paediatric Gastroenterology department extracted. Data of 63 children collected in five years from 2012 to 2016. Anthropometric data, feeding details, liver function test (LFT) data recorded. Anthropometric data analysed with IAP growth charts. Data entered in excel sheet of window 10. Appropriate statistical data used for analysis of variables.Results: Majority of children of AP were 11-15 years age group. In 63 patients, 28 (44.4%) were undernourished, 23 (36.5%) having normal BMI, 9 (14.3%) were overweight and 3 (4.8%) were obese. Nasojejunal feeding was associated mostly in patients with severe AP. LFT were deranged mostly in cases of severe AP.Conclusions: Overweight, obese and also undernourished children were having more severe AP. Children on nasojejunal feeding (NJ) were mostly having severe AP.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Bolia, Rishi, Nowneet Kumar Bhat, and Gourav Kaushal. "Conservative management of pancreatic ascites: The role of nasojejunal feeding." Pancreatology 21, no. 8 (December 2021): 1555–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2021.09.013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Pobiel, R. S., G. S. Bisset, and M. S. Pobiel. "Nasojejunal feeding tube placement in children: four-year cumulative experience." Radiology 190, no. 1 (January 1994): 127–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259389.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Kozak, Roman I., John Bennett, and Donald H. Taves. "Technique for Placement of Non-End-Hole Nasojejunal Feeding Tubes." Radiology 211, no. 2 (May 1999): 584–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.2.r99ma03584.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Cuffari, C., and L. Wilson. "Endoscopically assisted gastrojejunal and nasojejunal feeding tube placement in pediatrics." Gastroenterology 114 (April 1998): A872—A873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(98)83554-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Cummings, Forrest, and Catherine A. Daley. "Esophagojejunostomy Feeding Tube Placement in 5 Dogs with Pancreatitis and Anorexia." Veterinary Medicine International 2014 (2014): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/197294.

Full text

Abstract:

Enteral feeding tube placement has been described in veterinary medicine for several years. Indications include oral, esophageal, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, hepatic, and neurologic diseases. In this paper, endoscopically assisted placement of an esophagojejunostomy (EJ) feeding tube in dogs with pancreatitis and prolonged anorexia is described. To the author’s knowledge there are no published reports of this procedure. Esophagojejunostomy feeding tubes provide an alternative to other forms of postgastric feeding tube placement (e.g., nasojejunal, gastrojejunostomy, and jejunostomy tubes) without the associated complications of patient discomfort, sneezing, epistaxis, and peritonitis. Tube occlusion, transient vomiting and loose stool were the most commonly reported complications.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Gerritsen, A., R. A. W. Wennink, O. R. C. Busch, I. H. M. Borel Rinkes, G. Kazemier, D. J. Gouma, I. Q. Molenaar, and M. G. H. Besselink. "Feeding patients with gastric outlet obstruction undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: Routine nasojejunal or early oral feeding?" HPB 18 (April 2016): e837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.01.432.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Lamichhane, Deep, Suraj Suwal, Resham Rana, and Rishikesh Narayan Shrestha. "Early enteral feeding using nasojejunal tube after gastric cancer surgery is safe and effective: a single unit experience from cancer hospital." Nepalese Journal of Cancer 6, no. 2 (October 6, 2022): 16–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njc.v6i2.48755.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: Patients are kept nil per oral (NPO) after surgery for gastric cancer and all patients receives intravenous fluids till oral feed is commenced. There is established benefit of enteral nutrition after surgery for gastric cancer. Early oral feeding comes with lots of hesitation for execution, so to offer benefits of early enteral nutrition and to avoid early oral feeding, nasojejunal tube (NJ) feeding can be used as alternative to feeding jejunostomy (FJ) and also total parenteral nutrition (TPN) can be avoided. The aim of this study is to present our experience of early enteral feeding using NJ tube and to convey the message that early feeding using NJ tube is safe, effective and has less complications. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients operated between April 2019 to March 2022, who had nasojejunal tube placed at the time of surgery. NJ tube was placed in the efferent limb of jejunum. Feeding was started from post operative day 1 and gradually progressed over days. NJ tube was removed after adequate oral intake. Results: Sixty patients were eligible for final analysis. Median age of patients was 61 years, IQR (53-69). Thirty-three patients underwent D2-subtotal gastrectomy, 16 underwent D2-total gastrectomy and 10 underwent gastro-jejunostomy. Median time for discharge is 12 days, IQR (12-14). The median time for NJ removal is 10 days, IQR (9-12). Thirty-four patients reported complications related to NJ feed, all were minor and easily manageable. Conclusion: NJ tube feeding offers the advantages of early enteral feeding after gastric cancer surgery. It is technically easy to use and should be advocated for its simplicity, low costs and great advantages as compared to FJ and TPN.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Skums, Anatolii, and Oleksandr Usenko. "EVALUATION OF RESULTS OF ERAS PROGRAM AFTER PANCREATODUODENECTOMY DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF GASTROINTESTINAL RECONSTRUCTION." Wiadomości Lekarskie 75, no. 1 (January 2022): 97–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.36740/wlek202201118.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim: To assess the effect of gastrojejunostomy with Braun anastomosis during PD for prevention of DGE in ERAS protocol patients. Materials and methods: A total of 92 patients from 28 to 75 years were included in this study, who underwent PD with ERAS program. Patients were divided into 2 groups, depending on type of reconstruction - PD with Child reconstruction and PD with gastrojejunostomy with Braun anastomosis. Results: In non-Braun group nasogastric tube was removed on POD 1 in 56 (93.3%) patients and was reinserted later in 4 (6.7%) patients. DGE was observed in 8 (13,3%) patients, which required enteral feeding via nasojejunal tube. In 51 (85.0%) patients feeding was started according to ERAS program without the need for other methods of nutritional support. In Braun group nasogastric tube was removed on POD 1 in all patients after the X-ray control and oral feeding was started. Due to the development of DGE, a nasojejunal tube for enteral nutrition was placed in two cases. In 30 (93,7%) patients peroral feeding was started in accordance to enhanced recovery program. Thus, the frequency of DGE in group II was lower (6.3%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.299). Conclusions: The formation of a Braun anastomosis in PD with the use of ERAS program can reduce the frequency of DGE and eliminate the consequences of technical errors. More studies are needed for stronger evidence.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Vinay, G., KS Balasubrahmanya, and BL Dharmendra. "Comparative study of Nasogastric Feeding and Nasojejunal Feeding routes of Enteral Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis." Madridge Journal of Surgery 1, no. 1 (February 20, 2018): 19–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.18689/mjs-1000105.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Davies, Andrew R., Paul R. A. Froomes, Craig J. French, Rinaldo Bellomo, Geoffrey A. Gutteridge, Ibolya Nyulasi, Robyn Walker, and Richard B. Sewell. "Randomized comparison of nasojejunal and nasogastric feeding in critically ill patients*." Critical Care Medicine 30, no. 3 (March 2002): 586–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200203000-00016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Wiggins, Travis F., and Mark H. DeLegge. "Evaluation of a new technique for endoscopic nasojejunal feeding-tube placement." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 63, no. 4 (April 2006): 590–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.10.043.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Gerritsen, Arja, Ann Duflou, Max Ramali, Olivier R. C. Busch, Dirk J. Gouma, Thomas M. van Gulik, Els J. M. Nieveen van Dijkum, Elisabeth M. H. Mathus-Vliegen, and Marc G. H. Besselink. "Electromagnetic-Guided Versus Endoscopic Placement of Nasojejunal Feeding Tubes After Pancreatoduodenectomy." Pancreas 45, no. 2 (February 2016): 254–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000448.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Appleton, BN, and AG Masoud. "Easy Placement of Transanastomotic Nasojejunal Triple Lumen Feeding Tube During Gastrectomy." Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 88, no. 1 (January 2006): 77–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2006.88.1.77c.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Falt, Přemysl, Petr Rohlík, Petr Fojtík, and Ondřej Urban. "A case of tangled nasojejunal feeding tube and percutaneous transhepatic drain." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 82, no. 2 (August 2015): 414–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1896.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Gerritsen, Arja, Marc G. Besselink, Kasia P. Cieslak, Menno R. Vriens, Elles Steenhagen, Richard van Hillegersberg, Inne H. Borel Rinkes, and I. Quintus Molenaar. "Efficacy and Complications of Nasojejunal, Jejunostomy and Parenteral Feeding After Pancreaticoduodenectomy." Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 16, no. 6 (April 20, 2012): 1144–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1887-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Gupta, Vineet Kumar, and Ram Chandra Soni. "A Rare Case of Gastric Outlet Obstruction due to Large Intramural Duodenal Hematoma Following Endotherapy for Bleeding Duodenal Ulcer in a Patient with End-stage Renal Disease." Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 08, no. 04 (October 2017): 199–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jde.jde_25_17.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACTWe report a very rare case and probably the first from India of gastric outlet obstruction due to a large intramural duodenal hematoma following combination endotherapy with hemoclipping and injection adrenaline 1:10,000 for actively bleeding duodenal ulcer in an elderly male patient with diabetes, hypertension, and end.stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis. The patient improved to approximately 6 weeks of conservative treatment with nasojejunal feeding.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Sefton, E. J., J. R. Boulton-Jones, D. Anderton, K. Teahon, and D. T. Knights. "Enteral feeding in patients with major burn injury: the use of nasojejunal feeding after the failure of nasogastric feeding." Burns 28, no. 4 (June 2002): 386–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0305-4179(02)00006-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Rao, Kiran, and Eric Rosendorf. "Using Endoclips to Secure Placement of a Nasojejunal Feeding Tube for Enteral Feeding in SMA Syndrome." American Journal of Gastroenterology 103 (September 2008): S276—S277. http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/00000434-200809001-00703.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Sun, Yun. "Enteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: Nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding?" World Chinese Journal of Digestology 25, no. 24 (2017): 2174. http://dx.doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v25.i24.2174.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Joubert, Corinne, Laurent-Eric Tiengou, Isabelle Hourmand-Ollivier, Manh-Thông Dao, and Marie-Astrid Piquet. "Feasibility of Self-Propelling Nasojejunal Feeding Tube in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis." Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 32, no. 6 (November 2008): 622–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148607108322396.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Chang, Yu-sui, Hua-qun Fu, Yuan-mei Xiao, and Ji-chun Liu. "Nasogastric or nasojejunal feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis." Critical Care 17, no. 3 (2013): R118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12790.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Pap, Ákos, Zsolt Szinku, Attila Haragh, Zoltán Kovács, Zsolt Káposztás, and Béla Hunyady. "Is nasogastric or nasojejunal enteral feeding more appropriate in severe acute pancreatitis?" Pancreatology 17, no. 3 (July 2017): S70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2017.05.221.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

PÃ¡pa, Kinga, Roland PsÃ¡der, ÃGnes Sterczer, ÃKos Pap, Minna Rinkinen, and Thomas Spillmann. "Endoscopically guided nasojejunal tube placement in dogs for short-term postduodenal feeding." Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 19, no. 6 (December 2009): 554–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-4431.2009.00477.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Kruchko, David, Natasha Shah, Charles Broy, and Dean Silas. "Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy Tube Placement for Treatment of Severe Hyperemesis Gravidarum in Pregnancy." Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports 8 (January 2020): 232470962097595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2324709620975954.

Full text

Abstract:

Hyperemesis gravidarum is a common disease. Most patients are effectively treated with conservative measures, but gastric feeding and, rarely, post-pyloric feeding can be necessary. A 27-year-old woman, G3P2002, with a history of refractory hyperemesis in previous pregnancies, required placement of a nasojejunal tube but was removed due to an oropharyngeal ulcer. Endoscopic placement of a percutaneous endoscopic transgastric-jejunostomy (PEG-J) tube caused resolution of her symptoms. Twelve days after placement, the distal tube became dislodged and was endoscopically replaced with hemoclip anchoring in the jejunum. PEG-J tube placement is a safe and effective option for nutritional support in refractory hyperemesis gravidarum.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Delaney, Emer. "Nutritional Care in Relation to COVID-19." British Journal of Nursing 29, no. 19 (October 22, 2020): 1096–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.19.1096.

Full text

Abstract:

The following article was written after the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. On reflection of clinical practice during this time, it was noted by the ICU team that the majority of ventilated patients appeared to have lost weight during their stay. Unfortunately, there was no ability to weigh patients during the pandemic, so this weight loss was a subjective observation. Regardless, this observation lead the ICU dietitian to retrospectively audit prescribed versus delivered feed. It was found that only 10% of admissions received the prescribed daily volume of feed within the first 7 days of admission. A further 6% of admissions were within 10% of achieving daily prescribed target volumes. The main reasons for this were proning patients, high gastric residual volumes and the overwhelming nature of the pandemic. Three areas of practice have been highlighted that will improve feed delivery should a second wave occur. 1. A nasojejunal team comprising 20 members of the ICU multidiciplinary team will be established to insert bedside nasojejunal tubes in all ICU patients on admission. 2. All proned patients will be enterally fed and practice adjusted as per British Dietetic Association recommendations. 3. The international enteral feeding guidelines regarding hypocaloric feeding for the first 7 days will not be followed due to minimal clinical evidence for the ICU COVID-19 demographic.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Keshava, H., A. Payan, P. Stanley, I. Seri, and P. Friedlich. "SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF NASOJEJUNAL TUBE PLACEMENT AND FEEDING IN CRITICALLY ILL INFANTS." Journal of Investigative Medicine 55, no. 1 (January 2007): S88—S89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00042871-200701010-00084.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Nasojejunal feeding'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles