Relevant bibliographies by topics / Nanofertilizer

Academic literature on the topic 'Nanofertilizer'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 11 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Nanofertilizer.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Nanofertilizer"

1

MÁRQUEZ-PRIETO, Ana K., Alejandro PALACIO-MÁRQUEZ, Esteban SANCHEZ, Bertha C. MACIAS-LÓPEZ, Sandra PÉREZ-ÁLVAREZ, Octavio VILLALOBOS-CANO, and Pablo PRECIADO-RANGEL. "Impact of the foliar application of potassium nanofertilizer on biomass, yield, nitrogen assimilation and photosynthetic activity in green beans." Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 50, no. 1 (February 25, 2022): 12569. http://dx.doi.org/10.15835/nbha50112569.

Full text
Abstract:
The agricultural areas of the world face problems that create difficulties when producing food and the excessive use of fertilizers is generating a negative environmental impact. An alternative that appears as a solution to this problem is the use of nanofertilizers. Within nanofertilizers an area of opportunity is the application of macronutrients, which report an increase in absorption efficiency of 19% compared to conventional fertilizers. Potassium (K) is one of the three macronutrients most used in agriculture and its deficiency affects key processes in plant development, limiting crop production. However, the number of publications where K is used as a nanofertilizer is limited, despite this, products in this form are already on the market. Therefore, the aim of this research work was to study the effect of the foliar application of K nanofertilizer on biomass, yield, nitrogen assimilation and photosynthetic activity in green beans cv. ‘Strike’. K was applied in the form of a nanofertilizer in doses of 0, 50, 100 and 200 ppm. The biomass accumulation, yield, nitrate reductase enzyme activity, photosynthetic activity and photosynthetic pigments were evaluated. The dose of 100 ppm of K nanofertilizer obtained a higher accumulation of biomass, nitrate reductase activity, photosynthetic activity, SPAD values and total chlorophyll content. While the 200-ppm dose obtained a higher increase in yield. The results obtained suggest that the application of K nanofertilizers benefits the physiological development of plants. However, more studies are required to compare the application of nanofertilizers with traditional fertilizers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Modi, S., S. Kumar, and P. K. Dubey. "Dynamics of chitosan based NPK-nanofertilizers in greenhouse cucumber production system." Journal of Environmental Biology 42, no. 1 (January 30, 2021): 162–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.22438/jeb/42/1/mrn-1251.

Full text
Abstract:
Aim: To study the effect of NPK-nonofertilizers on growth, reproductive and yield parameters as well as nutrient recovery efficiency in greenhouse cucumber. Methodology: The performance of greenhouse cucumber cultivar KPCH-1 was studied using six treatments namely 100% RDF(90:75:75 kg ha-1) through water soluble fertilizer (WSF), 60% RDF as nanofertilizer, 50% RDF as nanofertilizer, 40% RDF as nanofertilizer, 30% RDF as nanofertilizer and absolute control. Growth, reproductive and yield parameters of greenhouse cucumber as well as nutrient use efficiency were assessed during cropping period. Results: The plants administered with 60% RDF through nano-fertilizer showed12.07%, 11.85% and 15.72% higher increase in leaf area at 30 and 60 DAS as well as at final harvest, respectively, over 100% RDF through WSF. The greenhouse cucumber fertigated with 40% RDF as nanofertilizer recorded maximum number of pickings and number of fruits per vine accounting for maximum increase in marketable yield compared to WSF. The cucumber plants administered with 40% RDF as nano-fertilizers also recorded maximum apparent N, P and K recovery efficiency. Interpretation: Nano-fertilizers have ability of controlled release of desired nutrients at their site of action. Despite of lower concentration, higher yield obtained at 40% nano-NPK fertilizer was associated with high nutrient recovery by nanofertilizers. Key words: Chitosan, Greenhouse cucumber, Nano-fertilizers, Horticultural traits
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Janmohammadi, Mohsen, Nasim Pornour, Abdollah Javanmard, and Naser Sabaghnia. "Effects of bio-organic, conventional and nanofertilizers on growth, yield and quality of potato in cold steppe / Bioorganinių, tradicinių ir nanotrąšų poveikis bulvių augimui, derliui ir kokybei šaltojoje stepėje." Botanica Lithuanica 22, no. 2 (December 1, 2016): 133–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/botlit-2016-0014.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an important crop in moderate to cold regions, producing high yields of nutritionally valuable food in the form of tubers. In the cold steppe of the North West of Iran, nutrient management is a crucial component for successful potato production. This study was conducted to determine the effect of different fertilizers on growth, phenological development, tuber yield and tuber qualitative characteristics in two potato cultivars (‘Agria’ and ‘Spirit’). Specific objectives were to assess the effects of nanofertilizers on potato. Fertilizer treatments included: T1- control (no fertilizer application), T2- N-P-K chemical bulk fertilizer, T3- MOG enzymatic bio-fertilizer, T4- nano-chelated calcium, T5- nano-chelated zinc+boron and T6- nano-chelated complete fertilizer. The results indicated that application of nano-chelated Zn+B, complete nanofertilizer and chemical bulk N-P-K significantly increased plant height, the number of stems, main stem diameter and the number of leaves, and also accelerated the row closure (canopy closure). Application of nanofertilizer noticeably decreased the number of days to the initiation of tuberization. The evaluation of tuber yield components revealed that the highest numbers of tuber per plant, mean tuber weight, tuber weight per plant and harvest index were obtained by application of complete nanofertilizer. Comparisons of the cultivars indicated that ‘Agria’ was more responsive than ‘Spirit’ to nutrient managements and showed a more acceptable performance. Nutrient managements significantly affected the qualitative characteristics of tuber; so that the highest dry matter, starch and protein content was recorded for plant grown by complete nanofertilizer. The results of the present experiment agreed with the conclusion that balanced plant nutrition through the efficient nanofertilizers can improve potato productivity. Maintaining soil fertility through an adequate, suitable and balanced nutrient supply is one of the key components for increasing potato production under irrigated condition in cold steppe.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Choudhary, Piyush, D. Singh, M. K. Kaushik, S. S. Sharma, H. K. Jain, V. Saharan, D. P. Singh, D. Chouhan, H. K. Sumeriya, and Manish Bera. "Response of Maize under Foliar Application of Zinc Based Nano fertilizer and Varying Fertility Levels on Quality, Yield, and Economics." Ecology, Environment and Conservation 28 (2022): 508–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.53550/eec.2022.v28i07s.082.

Full text
Abstract:
The present study was carried out during two consecutive Kharif, seasons of 2020 & 2021 at Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture & Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan to assess the response of maize crop under foliar application of zinc based nanofertilizer and varying fertility levels on quality, yield and economics in Southern Rajasthan. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized design with three replications comprising four foliar application of nanofertilizer (Control, at knee high stage, at 50% tasseling stage and both at knee high stage and at 50% tasseling stage) and four fertility levels (100% RDF, 90% RDF, 80% RDF and control). Significantly highest protein content of maize (11.13 % and 10.97 %) was found in with dual foliar application of nanofertilizer and 90 per cent RDF, respectively. The significantly highest net return and B:C ratio were found under dual foliar application of nanofertilizer 82956 and 3.04) and soil application of 90 per cent RDF (Rs. 86112 and 3.15) in tested maize crop.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mandal, Debashis, and Lalrinchhani . "Nanofertilizer and its application in horticulture." Journal of Applied Horticulture 23, no. 1 (December 25, 2020): 70–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.37855/jah.2021.v23i01.14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

., Kanjur Wangdi. "PRODUCTION OF NANOFERTILIZER- A MINI REVIEW." International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology 4, no. 3 (July 31, 2019): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2019.v04i03.001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Mikkelsen, Robert. "Nanofertilizer and Nanotechnology: A quick look." Better Crops with Plant Food 102, no. 3 (August 15, 2018): 18–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.24047/bc102318.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Fadzil, Nadia Izati, Suwanty Ridzuan Anoam, Mohd Nor Mohd Rosmi, Mohd Firdaus Mohd Anuar, and Noor Azlina Masdor. "Toxicity Assessment of Colloidal Nanofertilizers Using Zebrafish Embryo Model through Acute Toxicity Assay." Materials Science Forum 1055 (March 4, 2022): 93–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/p-swiwg6.

Full text
Abstract:
Chemical fertilizers are used in large quantities to boost the plant's development. Approximately 90 % of the fertilizer used is lost due to runoff and other processes, resulting in surface and groundwater contamination downstream. Nanofertilizers are believed to be more ecologically friendly and effective when used in small quantities. The use of nanomaterials in agriculture is not always successful. Nanoparticles may readily be discharged into water or the air, where they are ingested by living creatures, causing toxicity in humans, animals, and aquatic life. The aquatic environment has been contaminated with fertilizer runoff, which has been found to have fatal and sublethal impacts on aquatic species. In this work, the harmful effects of NPK-nanofertilizers were determined using the zebrafish embryo toxicity test (ZFET). To summarize, all nanofertilizers were dissolved in deionized water and diluted into concentration ranges in embryo medium. The toxicity of the fertilizer sample was next assessed on the early development of zebrafish embryos from 24 hours post-exposure (hpe) to 120 hpe. The survival rate, LC50, hatching rate, heart rate, and teratogenicity were all assessed. Toxicity of nanofertilizers T1, T2, and T3 to zebrafish embryos was moderate, with LC50 values of 45.7, 38.56, and 19.52 mM, respectively. While no teratogenic defect was seen in embryos treated with the respective samples from 0 hpe to 120 hpe, there was no teratogenic defect observed in the embryos treated with the respective samples from 0 hpe to 120 hpe. The larval heartbeat and hatching rate are unaffected by the nanofertilizer samples. As a result, the current study lays the groundwork for understanding the developmental toxicity of nanofertilizers in zebrafish embryos. Because little is known about the harmful effects of nanofertilizers on aquatic vertebrate species, this knowledge is essential for future research evaluating aquatic risk from nanofertilizers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Singam, Shylaja, Anand Rao Mesineni, and Ch Shilpa Chakra. "Effects of Formulated Nano-Urea Hydroxyapatite Slow Release Fertilizer Composite on the Physical, Chemical Properties, Growth and Yield of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (Cluster Beans)." Asian Journal of Chemistry 33, no. 1 (2020): 159–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2021.22975.

Full text
Abstract:
Urea and phosphorous fertilizers are commonly used in agriculture but, due to their solubility in water and transportation, cause eutrophication. Hence, it is thought worthwhile to investigate for urea hydroxyapatite nanoparticles which have less mobility and could supply required N and P macronutrients to the crops. These high surface area nanoparticles are synthesized through chemical co-precipitation method and it is assumed that due to their biocompatibility, act as rich phosphorous and nitrogen source. These are characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR). The impact of urea hydroxyapatite nanofertilizer on growth and yield of cluster bean plants for the period of four months has been carried out. The experimental results have shown that the usage of these nanofertilizers have enhanced both the plant growth and yield. The application of urea hydroxyapatite nanocomposites for the bio-availability of plants considered to be environment friendly.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sharma, Garima, and Prateek Sharma. "Chitosan nanofertilizer boost source activity in plant." Journal of Plant Nutrition 44, no. 16 (June 18, 2021): 2486–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1918159.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Nanofertilizer"

1

Elhaj, Baddar Zeinah. "ENGINEERING ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES TO BE USED AS NANOFERTILIZERS." UKnowledge, 2018. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_etds/109.

Full text
Abstract:
Zinc deficient soils, or soils with low Zn bioavailability, are widespread, which exacerbates Zn deficiency in human as crops grown on these soils have low Zn content. Often crop yields are also compromised. Fertilizers based on soluble Zn salts often have limited efficacy in such soils. In this research, we evaluate the performance of polymer coated and bare ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) in an attempt to overcome limitations of soluble Zn salts in alkaline soils. We first synthesized 20-30 nm bare ZnO NPs with different surface chemistries to impart colloidal stability to the particles. Bare ZnO were treated in phosphate solution under certain conditions leading to the formation of a core made of ZnO NPs that is covered by a shell of amorphous Zn3(PO4)2 (core-shell NPs). This confers a negative charge to the particles over a wide pH range. The addition of nonionic (neutral dextran) and polyelectrolyte (negatively charged dextran sulfate (DEX(SO4)) during the synthesis resulted in the formation of DEX and DEX(SO4) ZnO NPs. Dextran has a minimal effect on the surface charge of ZnO but dextran sulfate confers a net negative charge. Bare and core-shell ZnO NPs were both electrostatically stabilized whereas DEX and DEX(SO4) ZnO NPs were sterically and electrosterically stabilized, respectively. We investigated the effect of treating seeds with ZnO NPs on the growth and accumulation of Zn in wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings in comparison to ZnSO4. All ZnO NPs stimulated seedling growth. Seedlings accumulated higher Zn concentrations when treated with ZnO NPs than with ZnSO4. Zinc sulfate was toxic even at the lower exposure concentrations, which was demonstrated by significantly lower germination success and seedling growth. In the second experiment, we investigated the effect of pH on the attachment and dissolution of ZnO NPs in soil, as compared to ZnSO4. Soil pH was adjusted to 6 and 8, then the soil was spiked with 100 mg Zn/kg soil in the form of ZnSO4, bare, DEX, DEX(SO4), and core-shell ZnO NPs. The results showed that DEX and core-shell ZnO NPs had significantly higher total Zn in soil solution compared to ZnSO4 at pH 8, with little dissolution. Dissolved Zn was similar among treatments except ZnSO4 at pH 6, indicating little dissolution of the ZnO NPs at either pH value. We also found that the engineered coatings dictate the behavior of the particles in simple aqueous systems, but their properties are altered in natural soil solutions because of the dominant effect of natural organic matter (NOM) on their surface chemistry. Based on the outcomes of the previous two experiments, we selected DEX and bare ZnO NPs to test the efficacy of ZnO NPs in delivering Zn to the grain of wheat under greenhouse conditions. We performed two independent studies where seeds were either treated with the NPs or grown in a soil spiked with Zn at pH 6 and 8 and spiked with Zn treatments (nano and ionic). We found that treating seeds with bare ZnO NPs significantly enhanced grain Zn concentrations as compared to the control, DEX-ZnO NPs, and ZnSO4. There were no differences in grain Zn concentration of plants treated with ionic or nano Zn treatments regardless of the soil pH. This work has elucidated important principles which will help carry forward efforts at developing effective ZnO NP-based fertilizers. It also suggests that treatment of seeds with ZnO NPs is more effective than amending soil or treating seeds with ZnSO4.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ciurli, Andrea. "FePO4 NANOPARTILCES AS SOURCE OF NUTRIENTS: EFFECTS ON THE PLANT-SOIL SYSTEM AND EVI-DENCE FOR A SAFE AND SUSTAINABLE NANO-FERTILIZATION." Doctoral thesis, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11562/1044499.

Full text
Abstract:
In the last decade, nanotechnology became a consistent part of the technological progress in modern agriculture, with applications in agri-food technology, nano-biosensoring, plant defence and plant nutrition. Nanomaterials which can provide one or more macro/micro-nutrient to the plant are commonly referred as nanofertilizers. Nevertheless, in the scientific literature there are still few evidence of a successful utilization of nanomaterials as fertilizers. In a previous work, it has been shown that iron phosphate (FePO4) nanoparticles (NPs) can provide either iron (Fe) or phosphate (P) to plants grown in hydroponic. The present study is aimed to highlight the effect of FePO4 NPs used as nanofertilizer in the whole plant-soil system, and to determine if they can represent a safe and effective alternative to conventional fertilizers. To investigate the plant early transcriptomic responses to FePO4 NPs exposure, microarray expression analyses have been performed in maize and cucumber roots grown in hydroponic for 24 hours. Responses of the plants treated with FePO4 NPs were shown to be associated mainly to biotic and abiotic stress, cell wall modulation and regulation of transcription, and triggered a different pattern of responses that was dependent on the nano-size. To evaluate the possibility to apply FePO4 NPs to the soil as fertilizer, two different bare soils were treated. Soil enzyme activities, CO2 respiration and DGGE analyses showed that there was not negative impact of FePO4 NPs onto soil microbial community and metabolic functions, neither toxic effects. Further, FePO4 NPs provided available P in bare soil in respect to triple superphosphate (TSP), even though the efficacy was dependent on the soil characteristics. Moreover, FePO4 NPs represented a source of available P for plant, which grown in soil in controlled condition without significant differences in respect to TSP, although P availability in the bare soil resulted lower for NPs than TSP. Microbial community associated to rhizosphere was not negatively affected by NPs and a stimulatory effect on enzyme activity was observed. In this work it was shown that FePO4 NPs can be applied to the soil without any negative consequence for the environment, enhancing plant growth and providing nutrients. These results encourage the hypothesis that the nanoparticulate nature of fertilizers could contribute to rationalize the chemical inputs in agriculture and increasing nutrient use efficiency
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Sega, Davide. "FePO4 nanoparticles as a source of nutrients for plants: synthesis and evaluation of their effects on hydroponically grown cucumber and maize seedlings." Doctoral thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11562/977172.

Full text
Abstract:
The nutrient use efficiency (NUE) of crops is typically low, in particular referring to the uptake of nutrients applied through fertilizers. A strategy to improve the NUE could be the development of new and more efficient fertilizers. A promising field in order to achieve this goal could be the use of nanotechnology. Nanomaterials are widely used in medical and pharmaceutical fields, but their application in agriculture and in particular in plant nutrition is at its infancy. A continuous method of FePO4 nanoparticles (FePO4 NPs) synthesis based on the extremely fine and rapid mixing of a FeCl3 solution with a K2HPO4 solution in a mixing chamber was tested for its effectiveness with a laboratory-made system. The proof-of-concept could produce FePO4 particles smaller than 100 nm, reaching the threshold of 50% of particles smaller of 100 nm, a value that is recommended by the European Union for the definition of nanomaterial. A pilot plant for the continuous FePO4 NPs synthesis was set up, using two dosing pumps for solutions pumping, and an HPLC mixing tee as mixing chamber. The system could produce 15 L•h-1 of raw FePO4 NPs suspension. Purification through dyalisis was optimized, together with a stabilization method of FePO4 NPs, called citrate capping, based on the adding of tribasic potassium citrate and thorough vortexing, in order to reduce aggregation and sedimentation of particles on long time periods. FePO4 NPs were then tested for their effectiveness as source of P and Fe on two hydroponically grown crop species, cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and maize (Zea mays). The experiments were designed in order to evaluate the effect of FePO4 NPs as source of both nutrients, or source of sole P and Fe. For this reason, as negative controls were used plants grown without P (-P), without Fe (-Fe), or without both nutrients (-P-Fe). In addition, in order to analyze if the size of FePO4 particles could cause different effects on plants, we included in the experiment a treatment with non-nanometric FePO4 (bulk FePO4). The results showed that nano-sized FePO4 improved the availability of P and Fe, if compared to the non-nano counterpart, as demonstrated by SPAD indexes of leaves and the determination of nutrients concentrations in tissues. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) observations on cucumber roots treated with FePO4 NPs revealed that these particles did not enter into the plant, suggesting as mechanism of delivery of nutrients the dissolution in the apoplast. Gene expression analysis of homologs of AtPHR1, a key regulator of the response to P starvation in Arabidopsis, revealed in cucumber an upregulation of Csa3M608690 in plants grown with FePO4 NPs. The transcriptional behavior of Csa1M024210, homologs of AtBTS, suggested that plants grown with both forms of FePO4 are, with respect of Fe, in good nutritional conditions thus confirming physiological parameters. For maize, the negative modulation of ZmFER-Like gene in response to all treatments suggested a minor role of this gene in the regulation of Fe homeostasis in this plant species, while the upregulation of ZmIRO2 in plants grown with both forms of FePO4 confirmed the sub-optimal nutritional state of the plants.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Nanofertilizer"

1

Fernandes Fraceto, Leonardo, Hudson Wallace Pereira de Carvalho, Renata de Lima, Subhashis Ghoshal, and Catherine Santaella, eds. Inorganic Nanopesticides and Nanofertilizers. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94155-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kumar, Ajay, Sougata Ghosh, and Sirikanjana Thongmee. Agricultural Nanobiotechnology: Biogenic Nanoparticles, Nanofertilizers and Nanoscale Biocontrol Agents. Elsevier Science & Technology, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kumar, Ajay, Sougata Ghosh, and Sirikanjana Thongmee. Agricultural Nanobiotechnology : : Biogenic Nanoparticles, Nanofertilizers and Nanoscale Biocontrol Agents. Elsevier Science & Technology, 2023.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hudson Wallace Pereira de Carvalho, Subhashis Ghoshal, Catherine Santaella, Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto, and Renata de Lima. Inorganic Nanopesticides and Nanofertilizers: A View from the Mechanisms of Action to Field Applications. Springer International Publishing AG, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Nanofertilizer"

1

Sidorowicz, Agnieszka, Qaisar Maqbool, and Mudassar Nazar. "Future of Nanofertilizer." In Nanotechnology for Agriculture: Crop Production & Protection, 143–52. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9374-8_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bedi, Ankita, and Braj Raj Singh. "Recent Advances in Nanofertilizer Development." In Nanotechnology in Agriculture and Environmental Science, 55–68. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003323945-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Khan, Mujeebur Rahman, and Tanveer Fatima Rizvi. "Application of Nanofertilizer and Nanopesticides for Improvements in Crop Production and Protection." In Nanoscience and Plant–Soil Systems, 405–27. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46835-8_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Butt, Beenish Zia, and Iqra Naseer. "Nanofertilizers." In Nanoagronomy, 125–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41275-3_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kalia, Anu, and Harleen Kaur. "Nanofertilizers." In NanoAgroceuticals & NanoPhytoChemicals, 45–61. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781351139281-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kalinichenko, K. V., G. N. Nikovskaya, V. O. Oliinyk, Yu M. Samchenko, and Z. R. Ulberg. "The Regularities of Sorption of Substances of Different Nature by pH-Sensitive Acrylic Hydrogels for Plant Nanofertilizer Formation." In Springer Proceedings in Physics, 225–33. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17755-3_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Tamez, Carlos, Nubia Zuverza-Mena, Wade Elmer, and Jason C. White. "Inorganic Nanoparticles to Promote Crop Health and Stimulate Growth." In Inorganic Nanopesticides and Nanofertilizers, 271–93. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94155-0_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

de Sousa, Bruno Teixeira, Jhones Luiz de Oliveira, Halley Caixeta Oliveira, and Vera Lúcia S. S. de Castro. "Balancing the Benefits to Agriculture and Adverse Ecotoxicological Impacts of Inorganic Nanoparticles." In Inorganic Nanopesticides and Nanofertilizers, 1–51. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94155-0_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Avellan, Astrid, Sónia M. Rodrigues, Bruno P. Morais, Benjamin Therrien, Yilin Zhang, Sandra Rodrigues, and Gregory V. Lowry. "Biological Barriers, Processes, and Transformations at the Soil–Plant–Atmosphere Interfaces Driving the Uptake, Translocation, and Bioavailability of Inorganic Nanoparticles to Plants." In Inorganic Nanopesticides and Nanofertilizers, 123–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94155-0_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

González-Morales, Susana, Perla Abigail Cárdenas-Atayde, Carlos Alberto Garza-Alonso, Armando Robledo-Olivo, and Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza. "Plant Biostimulation with Nanomaterials: A Physiological and Molecular Standpoint." In Inorganic Nanopesticides and Nanofertilizers, 153–85. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94155-0_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Nanofertilizer"

1

Júnior, Afonso, Jéssica Mulinari, Carlos de Oliveira, and Francisco Reichart. "NANOFERTILIZERS: AN OVERVIEW." In CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DA AGROINDÚSTRIA. Instituto Internacional Despertando Vocações, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31692/iciagro.2020.0041.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Polyakov, A. Yu, M. T. Cieschi, T. A. Sorkina, M. M. Zimbovskaya, V. A. Lebedev, D. S. Volkov, D. A. Pankratov, N. A. Kulikova, and I. V. Perminova. "Design of humic-based iron nanofertilizers: iron (hydr)oxide chemistry, nanoscale benefits, and multilevel impact of humic substances." In Fifth International Conference of CIS IHSS on Humic Innovative Technologies «Humic substances and living systems». CLUB PRINT ltd., 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36291/hit.2019.polyakov.124.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Nanofertilizer' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography