Academic literature on the topic 'Multiple criteria analysis'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Multiple criteria analysis.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Multiple criteria analysis"
Nuthall, P. L. "MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS." Agricultural Economics 5, no. 2 (June 1991): 174–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1991.tb00147.x.
Full textFlores, Benito E., and D. Clay Whybark. "Multiple Criteria ABC Analysis." International Journal of Operations & Production Management 6, no. 3 (March 1986): 38–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb054765.
Full textAntoine, Jacques, Günther Fischer, and Marek Makowski. "Multiple criteria land use analysis." Applied Mathematics and Computation 83, no. 2-3 (May 1997): 195–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0096-3003(96)00190-7.
Full textZavadskas, E. K., A. Kaklauskas, N. Lepkova, and J. Zalatorius. "FACILITIES MANAGEMENT MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS." Statyba 7, no. 6 (January 2001): 481–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13921525.2001.10531776.
Full textFlores, Benito E., and D. Clay Whybark. "Implementing multiple criteria ABC analysis." Engineering Costs and Production Economics 15 (May 1989): 191–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-188x(89)90124-9.
Full textFlores, Benito E., and D. Clay Whybark. "Implementing multiple criteria ABC analysis." Journal of Operations Management 7, no. 1-2 (October 1987): 79–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(87)90008-8.
Full textNijkamp, Peter. "MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATED IMPACT ANALYSIS." Impact Assessment 4, no. 3-4 (March 1986): 226–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1986.9725786.
Full textNijkamp, Peter, Hans Schaffers, and Jaap Spronk. "Multiple futures and multiple discount rates in multiple criteria analysis." Project Appraisal 4, no. 1 (March 1989): 2–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1989.9726699.
Full textKaftanowicz, Michał, and Michał Krzemiński. "Multiple-criteria Analysis of Plasterboard Systems." Procedia Engineering 111 (2015): 364–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.102.
Full textGreene, Randal, Rodolphe Devillers, Joan E. Luther, and Brian G. Eddy. "GIS-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis." Geography Compass 5, no. 6 (June 2011): 412–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00431.x.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Multiple criteria analysis"
Chen, Ye. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: Classification Problems and Solutions." Thesis, University of Waterloo, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/2892.
Full text- Screening: Reduce a large set of alternatives to a smaller set that most likely contains the best choice.
- Sorting: Arrange the alternatives into a few groups in preference order, so that the DM can manage them more effectively.
- Nominal classification: Assign alternatives to nominal groups structured by the DM, so that the number of groups, and the characteristics of each group, seem appropriate to the DM.
Sorting problems are studied extensively under three headings. Case-based distance sorting is carried out with Model I, which is optimized for use with cardinal criteria only, and Model II, which is designed for both cardinal and ordinal criteria; both sorting approaches are applied to a case study in Canadian municipal water usage analysis. Sorting in inventory management is studied using a case-based distance method designed for multiple criteria ABC analysis, and then applied to a case study involving hospital inventory management. Finally sorting is applied to bilateral negotiation using a case-based distance model to assist negotiators that is then demonstrated on a negotiation regarding the supply of bicycle components.
A new kind of decision analysis problem, called multiple criteria nominal classification (MCNC), is addressed. Traditional classification methods in MCDA focus on sorting alternatives into groups ordered by preference. MCNC is the classification of alternatives into nominal groups, structured by the DM, who specifies multiple characteristics for each group. The features, definitions and structures of MCNC are presented, emphasizing criterion and alternative flexibility. An analysis procedure is proposed to solve MCNC problems systematically and applied to a water resources planning problem.
Sobrie, Olivier. "Learning preferences with multiple-criteria models." Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay (ComUE), 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016SACLC057/document.
Full textMultiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) aims at providing support in order to make a decision. MCDA methods allow to handle choice, ranking and sorting problems. These methods usually involve the elicitation of models. Eliciting the parameters of these models is not trivial. Indirect elicitation methods simplify this task by learning the parameters of the decision model from preference statements issued by the decision maker (DM) such as “alternative a is preferred to alternative b” or “alternative a should be classified in the best category”. The information provided by the decision maker are usually parsimonious. The MCDA model is learned through an interactive process between the DM and the decision analyst. The analyst helps the DM to modify and revise his/her statements if needed. The process ends once a model satisfying the preferences of the DM is found. Preference learning (PL) is a subfield of machine learning which focuses on the elicitation of preferences. Algorithms in this subfield are able to deal with large data sets and are validated withartificial and real data sets. Data sets used in PL are usually collected from different sources and aresubject to noise. Unlike in MCDA, there is little or no interaction with the user in PL. The input data set is considered as a noisy sample of a “ground truth”. Algorithms used in this field have strong statistical properties that allow them to filter noise in the data sets.In this thesis, we develop learning algorithms to infer the parameters of MCDA models. Precisely, we develop a metaheuristic designed for learning the parameters of a MCDA sorting model called majority rule sorting (MR-Sort) model. This metaheuristic is assessed with artificial and real data sets issued from the PL field. We use the algorithm to deal with a real application in the medical domain. Then we modify the metaheuristic to learn the parameters of a more expressive model called the non-compensatory sorting (NCS) model. After that, we develop a new type of veto rule for MR-Sort and NCS models which allows to take criteria coalitions into account. The last part of the thesis introduces semidefinite programming (SDP) in the context of multiple-criteria decision analysis. We use SDP to learn the parameters of an additive value function model
Raboun, Oussama. "Multiple Criteria Spatial Risk Rating." Thesis, Paris Sciences et Lettres (ComUE), 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PSLED066.
Full textThe thesis is motivated by an interesting case study related to environmental risk assessment. The case study problem consists on assessing the impact of a nuclear accident taking place in the marine environment. This problem is characterized by spatial characteristics, different assets characterizing the spatial area, incomplete knowledge about the possible stakeholders, and a high number of possible accident scenarios. A first solution of the case study problem was proposed where different decision analysis techniques were used such as lotteries comparison, and MCDA (Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis) tools. A new MCDA rating method, named Dynamic-R, was born from this thesis, aiming at providing a complete and convincing rating. The developed method provided interesting results to the case study, and very interesting theoretical properties that will be presented in chapters 6 and 7 of this manuscript
Levy, Jason K. "Computer support for environmental multiple criteria decision analysis under uncertainty." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2001. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/NQ60552.pdf.
Full textBelton, V. "A comparative study of methods for multiple criteria decision aiding." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1986. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.377201.
Full textImam, Bisher. "Nonlinear uncertainty analysis for multiple criteria natural resource decision support systems." Diss., The University of Arizona, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/186949.
Full textCabrera, Rios Mauricio. "MULTIPLE CRITERIA OPTIMIZATION STUDIES IN REACTIVE IN-MOLD COATING." The Ohio State University, 2002. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1022105843.
Full textLøken, Espen. "Multi-Criteria Planning of Local Energy Systems with Multiple Energy Carriers." Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information Technology, Mathematics and Electrical Engineering, 2007. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-1490.
Full textBackground and Motivation
Unlike what is common in Europe and the rest of the world, Norway has traditionally met most of its stationary energy demand (including heating) with electricity, because of abundant access to hydropower. However, after the deregulation of the Norwegian electricity market in the 1990s, the increase in the electricity generation capacity has been less than the load demand increase. This is due to the relatively low electricity prices during the period, together with the fact that Norway’s energy companies no longer have any obligations to meet the load growth. The country’s generation capacity is currently not sufficient to meet demand, and accordingly, Norway is now a net importer of electricity, even in normal hydrological years. The situation has led to an increased focus on alternative energy solutions.
It has been common that different energy infrastructures – such as electricity, district heating and natural gas networks – have been planned and commissioned by independent companies. However, such an organization of the planning means that synergistic effects of a combined energy system to a large extent are neglected. During the last decades, several traditional electricity companies have started to offer alternative energy carriers to their customers. This has led to a need for a more comprehensive and sophisticated energy-planning process, where the various energy infrastructures are planned in a coordinated way. The use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) appears to be suited for coordinated planning of energy systems with multiple energy carriers. MCDA is a generic term for different methods that help people make decisions according to their preferences in situations characterized by multiple conflicting criteria.
The thesis focuses on two important stages of a multi-criteria planning task:
- The initial structuring and modelling phase
- The decision-making phase
The Initial Structuring and Modelling Phase
It is important to spend sufficient time and resources on the problem definition and structuring, so that all disagreements among the decision-maker(s) (DM(s)) and the analyst regarding the nature of the problem and the desired goals are eliminated. After the problem has been properly identified, the next step of a multi-criteria energy-planning process is the building of an energy system model (impact model). The model is used to calculate the operational attributes necessary for the multi-criteria analysis; in other words, to determine the various alternatives’ performance values for some or all of the criteria being considered. It is important that the model accounts for both the physical characteristics of the energy system components and the complex relationships between the system parameters. However, it is not propitious to choose/build an energy system model with a greater level of detail than needed to achieve the aims of the planning project.
In my PhD research, I have chosen to use the eTransport model as the energy system model. This model is especially designed for planning of local and regional energy systems, where different energy carriers and technologies are considered simultaneously. However, eTransport can currently provide information only about costs and emissions directly connected to the energy system’s operation. Details about the investment plans’ performance on the remaining criteria must be found from other information sources. Guidelines should be identified regarding the extent to which different aspects should be accounted for, and on the ways these impacts can be assessed for each investment plan under consideration. However, it is important to realize that there is not one solution for how to do this that is valid for all kind of local energy-planning problems. It is therefore necessary for the DM(s) and the analyst to discuss these issues before entering the decision-making phase.
The Decision-Making Phase
Two case studies have been undertaken to examine to what extent the use of MCDA is suitable for local energy-planning purposes. In the two case studies, two of the most well-known MCDA methods, the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), have been tested. Other MCDA methods, such as GP or the outranking methods, could also have been applied. However, I chose to focus on value measurement methods as AHP and MAUT, and have not tested other methods. Accordingly, my research cannot determine if value measurement methods are better suited for energy-planning purposes than GP or outranking methods are.
Although all MCDA methods are constructed to help DMs explore their ‘true values’ – which theoretically should be the same regardless of the method used to elicit them – our experiments showed that different MCDA methods do not necessarily provide the same results. Some of the differences are caused by the two methods’ different ways of asking questions, as well as the DMs’ inability to express clearly their value judgements by using one or both the methods. In particular, the MAUT preference-elicitation procedure was difficult to understand and accept for DMs without previous experience with the utility concept. An additional explanation of the differences is that the external uncertainties included in the problem formulation are better accounted for in MAUT than in AHP. There are also a number of essential weaknesses in the theoretical foundation of the AHP method that may have influenced the results using that method. However, the AHP method seems to be preferred by DMs, because the method is straightforward and easier to use and understand than the relatively complex MAUT method.
It was found that the post-interview process is essential for a good decision outcome. For example, the results from the preference aggregation may indicate that according to the DM’s preferences, a modification of one of the alternatives might be propitious. In such cases, it is important to realize that MCDA is an iterative process. The post-interview process also includes presentation and discussion of results with the DMs. Our experiments showed that the DMs might discover inconsistencies in the results; that the results do not reflect the DM’s actual preferences for some reason; or that the results simply do not feel right. In these cases, it is again essential to return to an earlier phase of the MCDA process and conduct a new analysis where these problems or discrepancies are taken into account.
The results from an MAUT analysis are usually presented to the DMs in the form of expected total utilities given on a scale from zero to one. Expected utilities are convenient for ranking and evaluation of alternatives. However, they do not have any direct physical meaning, which quite obviously is a disadvantage from an application point of view. In order to improve the understanding of the differences between the alternatives, the Equivalent Attribute Technique (EAT) can be applied. EAT was tested in the first of the two case studies. In this case study, the cost criterion was considered important by the DMs, and the utility differences were therefore converted to equivalent cost differences. In the second case study, the preference elicitation interviews showed, quite surprisingly, that cost was not considered among the most important criteria by the DMs, and none of the other attributes were suitable to be used as the equivalent attribute. Therefore, in this case study, the use of EAT could not help the DMs interpreting the differences between the alternatives.
Summarizing
For MCDA to be really useful for actual local energy planning, it is necessary to find/design an MCDA method which: (1) is easy to use and has a transparent logic; (2) presents results in a way easily understandable for the DM; (3) is able to elicit and aggregate the DMs' real preferences; and (4) can handle external uncertainties in a consistent way.
Brestovac, Goran, and Robi Grgurina. "Applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Embedded Systems Design." Thesis, Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik, 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-22013.
Full textMILZ, GEOFFREY G. "Beyond Ad-Hoc: An Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Emergency Planning and Response." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1212072805.
Full textBooks on the topic "Multiple criteria analysis"
Greco, Salvatore, Matthias Ehrgott, and José Rui Figueira, eds. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4.
Full textCarlos, Romero. Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.
Find full textEhrgott, Matthias, José Rui Figueira, and Salvatore Greco, eds. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1.
Full textInternational Conference on MCDM (11th 1994 Coimbra, Portugal). Multicriteria analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Find full textSeo, Fumiko, and Masatoshi Sakawa. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Regional Planning. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4035-2.
Full textMatsatsinis, Nikolaos, and Evangelos Grigoroudis, eds. Preference Disaggregation in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90599-0.
Full textLarichev, Oleg I., and David L. Olson. Multiple Criteria Analysis in Strategic Siting Problems. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3245-0.
Full textEvans, Gerald W. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Industrial Engineering. Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis, a CRC title, part of the Taylor & Francis imprint, a member of the Taylor & Francis Group, the academic division of T&F Informa, plc, [2016] | Series: Operations research series; 12: CRC Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315381398.
Full textJ, Stewart Theodor, ed. Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Multiple criteria analysis"
Moshkovich, Helen, Alexander Mechitov, and David Olson. "Verbal Decision Analysis." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 605–36. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_15.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. "The Multiple Criteria Problem." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 13–33. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_2.
Full textBelton, Valerie. "An Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis With Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis." In Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 71–79. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2918-6_6.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. "Introduction." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 1–12. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_1.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. "MCDA in a Broader Context." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 293–329. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_10.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. "An Integrated Approach to MCDA." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 331–43. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_11.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. "Preference Modelling." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 79–118. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_4.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. "Value Function Methods: Practical Basics." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 119–61. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_5.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. "Value Function Methods: Indirect And Interactive." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 163–207. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_6.
Full textBelton, Valerie, and Theodor J. Stewart. "Goal and Reference Point Methods." In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, 209–32. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_7.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Multiple criteria analysis"
Jin, Ruichen, Wei Chen, and Timothy Simpson. "Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria." In 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-4801.
Full textKovaleva, Yulia, Mehdi Ostadhassan, and Naser Tamimi. "Optimizing microseismic design using multiple criteria decision analysis." In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17659945.1.
Full textDerek, Jurica, and Marjan Sikora. "Bicycle Route Planning Using Multiple Criteria GIS Analysis." In 2019 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/softcom.2019.8903800.
Full textDing, Bin, and Lianlu Sun. "An inventory classification model for multiple criteria ABC analysis." In 2011 8th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM 2011). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsssm.2011.5959351.
Full textYan Li and Manoj A. Thomas. "A Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Software Selection Framework." In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2014.141.
Full textWang, Rui, GuangLi Nie, and Yong Shi. "Multiple Criteria Quadratic Programming for Fund Customer Churn Analysis." In 2011 Fourth International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization (CSO). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cso.2011.173.
Full textSabri, Karim, Gérard E. Colson, Augustin M. Mbangala, and Daniel M. Dubois. "Multiple Criteria and Multiple Periods Performance Analysis: The Comparison of North African Railways." In COMPUTING ANTICIPATORY SYSTEMS: CASYS’07—Eighth International Conference. AIP, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3020675.
Full textZhang, Peng, and Jingran Dai. "Multiple-Criteria Linear Programming for VIP E-Mail Behavior Analysis." In 2007 Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining - Workshops (ICDM Workshops). IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdmw.2007.45.
Full textZhu, Meihong, Yong Shi, Aihua Li, and Peng Zhang. "A Bias-Variance Analysis of Multiple Criteria Linear Programming Classification Ensembles." In 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/wiiat.2008.283.
Full textMahammed, Nadir, Sidi Mohamed Benslimane, Ali Ouldkradda, and Mahmoud Fahsi. "Evolutionary Business Process Optimization using a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis method." In 2018 International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems (CITS). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cits.2018.8440166.
Full textReports on the topic "Multiple criteria analysis"
Zhang, Linlin, Xiaoming Xi, Xihua Liu, Xinjie Qu, Qing Wang, Haihao Cao, Limin Wang, et al. Should aerobic and resistance training interventions for Multiple sclerosis be performed on the same day: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, December 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.12.0126.
Full textHorvit, Andrew, and Donald Molony. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mortality and Kidney Function in Uranium – Exposed Individuals. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.4.0122.
Full textSandeep, Bhushan, Huang Xin, and Xiao Zongwei. A comparison of regional anesthesia techniques in patients undergoing of video-assisted thoracic surgery: A network meta-analysis. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, February 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.2.0003.
Full textBhushan, Sandeep, Huang Xin, and Xiao Zongwei. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing liver surgery: what we might know from a meta-analysis of Randomized control trials. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, January 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.1.0094.
Full textKürşat Önder, Yasin, Maria Alejandra Ruiz-Sanchez, Sara Restrepo-Tamayo, and Mauricio Villamizar-Villegas. Government Borrowing and Crowding Out. Banco de la República, December 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.32468/be.1182.
Full textSelph, Shelly S., Andrea C. Skelly, Ngoc Wasson, Joseph R. Dettori, Erika D. Brodt, Erik Ensrud, Diane Elliot, et al. Physical Activity and the Health of Wheelchair Users: A Systematic Review in Multiple Sclerosis, Cerebral Palsy, and Spinal Cord Injury. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), October 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.23970/ahrqepccer241.
Full textTosi, R., R. Codina, J. Principe, R. Rossi, and C. Soriano. D3.3 Report of ensemble based parallelism for turbulent flows and release of solvers. Scipedia, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.23967/exaqute.2022.3.06.
Full textEkegren, Michael, and Sandra LeGrand. Incorporating terrain roughness into helicopter landing zone site selection by using the Geomorphic Oscillation Assessment Tool (GOAT) v1.0. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/42162.
Full textSitabkhan, Yasmin, and Linda M. Platas. Early Mathematics Counts: Promising Instructional Strategies from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. RTI Press, July 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.op.0055.1807.
Full textMichalak, Julia, Josh Lawler, John Gross, and Caitlin Littlefield. A strategic analysis of climate vulnerability of national park resources and values. National Park Service, September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36967/nrr-2287214.
Full text