To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Multi risk assessment.

Books on the topic 'Multi risk assessment'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Multi risk assessment.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Abella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede: International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Abella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede: International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Abella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede: International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ren, Jingzheng, ed. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Assessment and Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78152-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gul, Muhammet, Suleyman Mete, Faruk Serin, and Erkan Celik. Fine–Kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-criteria Occupational Risk Assessment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52148-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Andy, Alaszewski, and English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting., eds. Risk assessment and management in multi-agency, multi-professional health care: Education and practice. London: English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

R, Parkhurst Benjamin, Cadmus Group, and Water Environment Research Foundation, eds. Aquatic ecological risk assessment: A multi-tiered approach : project 91-AER-1. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hmara, Ivan, and Viktor Strel'nikov. Environmental epidemiology and risk assessment. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1019063.

Full text
Abstract:
The material presented in the textbook is based on modern ideas about environmental epidemiology as an interdisciplinary field of knowledge, the purpose of which is a multi — level study of the "environment-human health"system. Special attention is paid to the issues of risk assessment as an integral part of ecoepidemiological research. It corresponds to the program of the discipline "Environmental Epidemiology", approved by the Scientific and Methodological Council for Environmental Education of UMO Universities. For students in the field of training 05.03.06 "Ecology and nature management", as well as related biological, environmental and medical areas and specialists of the relevant work profiles.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Olsen, Odd Einar. Standardization and risk governance: A multi-disciplinary approach. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

SETAC Workshop on Framework for Ecological Risk Management (1997 Williamsburg, Va.). A multi-stakeholder framework for ecological risk management: Summary of a SETAC technical workshop. Pensacola, FL: SETAC Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency., ed. Multi hazard identification and risk assessment: The cornerstone of the national mitigation strategy. [Washington, D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Sorvari, Jaana. Application of risk assessment and multi-criteria analysis in contaminated land management in Finland. Helsinki: Edita Prima, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

United States. Nuclear Regulatory Commission., ed. Multi-agency radiation survey and site investigation manual (MARSSIM): Final. Washington, D.C: United States, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Indonesia) Forum Riset Geomatika (2006 Jakarta. Forum Riset Geomatika (GeoReForm 2006): Multi-hazards, challenges for risk assessment, mapping, and management : prosiding. Cibinong: Balai Penelitian Geomatika, Pusat Pelayanan Jasa dan Informasi, Badan Koordinasi Survei dan Pemetaan Nasional, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Tribhuvana Viśvavidyālaya. Central Department of Environmental Science. Multi-hazard and risk assessment of Istul and Manpan watersheds, Budhi Gandaki River basin, Nepal. Kathmandu: Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

United States. Environmental Protection Agency., United States. Dept. of Defense., United States. Dept. of Energy., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission., United States. Food and Drug Administration., Geological Survey (U.S.), and National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.), eds. Multi-agency radiological laboratory, analytical protocols manual. [Washington, D.C: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission], 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Duo chi du tu fa huan jing wu ran shi gu feng xian qu hua = Multi-scale environmental pollution emergency risk zoning. Beijing: Ke xue chu ban she, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

United States. Environmental Protection Agency., United States. Dept. of Defense., United States. Dept. of Energy., and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission., eds. Multi-agency radiation survey and site investigation manual (MARSSIM): Draft for public comment. [Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission?], 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Assessment and Management. Springer International Publishing AG, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Ren, Jingzheng. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Assessment and Management. Springer International Publishing AG, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Taylor, Craig E. Robust Simulation for Mega-Risks: The Path from Single-Solution to Competitive, Multi-Solution Methods for Mega-Risk Management. Springer, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Taylor, Craig. Robust Simulation for Mega-Risks: The Path from Single-Solution to Competitive, Multi-Solution Methods for Mega-Risk Management. Springer, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Toxicological Risk Assessment and Multi-System Health Impacts from Exposure. Elsevier, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/c2020-0-02454-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Tsatsakis, Aristidis M. Toxicological Risk Assessment and Multi-System Health Impacts from Exposure. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Tsatsakis, Aristidis M. Toxicological Risk Assessment and Multi-System Health Impacts from Exposure. Academic Press, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Olsen, Odd Einar. Standardization and Risk Governance: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Taylor & Francis, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Kumar, Vijay, Prasenjit Chatterjee, Rajeev Kumar, and Jyoti Chawla. Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Risk Assessment of Emerging Environmental Contaminants. Wiley & Sons, Limited, John, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Kumar, Vijay, Prasenjit Chatterjee, Rajeev Kumar, and Jyoti Chawla. Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Risk Assessment of Emerging Environmental Contaminants. Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, John, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Kumar, Vijay, Prasenjit Chatterjee, Rajeev Kumar, and Jyoti Chawla. Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Risk Assessment of Emerging Environmental Contaminants. Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, John, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Kumar, Vijay, Prasenjit Chatterjee, Rajeev Kumar, and Jyoti Chawla. Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Risk Assessment of Emerging Environmental Contaminants. Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, John, 2022.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Hill, Maxine L. Multi Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment: A Cornerstone of the National Mitigation Strategy. DIANE Publishing Company, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Federation, Water Environment, Benjamin R. Parkhurst, and Cadmus Group. Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment: A Multi-Tiered Approach: Project 91-Aer-1. Water Environment Federation, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Pena, Neiler Medina. Adaptive Disaster Risk Assessment: Combining Multi-Hazards with Socioeconomic Vulnerability and Dynamic Exposure. Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Pena, Neiler Medina. Adaptive Disaster Risk Assessment: Combining Multi-Hazards with Socioeconomic Vulnerability and Dynamic Exposure. Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Pena, Neiler Medina. Adaptive Disaster Risk Assessment: Combining Multi-Hazards with Socioeconomic Vulnerability and Dynamic Exposure. Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Risk Analysis As Polity-Making in Multi-level Administrations. Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Multi-Asset Risk Modeling: Techniques for a Global Economy in an Electronic and Algorithmic Trading Era. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Multi-agency radiation survey and site investigation manual (MARSSIM): Final. [Washington, D.C: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Multi-agency radiation survey and site investigation manual (MARSSIM): Final. [Washington, D.C: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Gul, Muhammet, Erkan Celik, Suleyman Mete, and Faruk Serin. Fine-Kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Occupational Risk Assessment: Approaches, Case Studies and Python Applications. Springer International Publishing AG, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Best, Katharina, Igor Mikolic-Torreira, Rebecca Balebako, Michael Johnson, Trung Tran, and Krista Romita Grocholski. Assessing Force Sufficiency and Risk Using RAND's Multi-Period Assessment of Force Flow (MPAFF) Tool. RAND Corporation, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.7249/rr1954.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Tran, Trung, Katharina Ley Best, Michael Johnson, Igor Mikolic-Torreira, and Rebecca Balebako. Assessing Force Sufficiency and Risk Using RAND's Multi-Period Assessment of Force Flow (MPAFF) Tool. RAND Corporation, The, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Gul, Muhammet, Erkan Celik, Suleyman Mete, and Faruk Serin. Fine–Kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Occupational Risk Assessment: Approaches, Case Studies and Python Applications. Springer, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Linkov, Igor, Gregory A. Kiker, and Richard J. Wenning. Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas: Management Using Comparative Risk Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Glantz, Morton, and Robert L. Kissell. Multi-Asset Risk Modeling: Techniques for a Global Economy in an Electronic and Algorithmic Trading Era. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Ştefan, Catrinel Alice. Social-Emotional Prevention Programs for Preschool Children's Behavior Problems: A Multi-level Efficacy Assessment of Classroom, Risk Group, and Individual Level. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Ştefan, Catrinel Alice. Social-Emotional Prevention Programs for Preschool Children's Behavior Problems: A Multi-level Efficacy Assessment of Classroom, Risk Group, and Individual Level. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

(Editor), Igor Linkov, Gregory A. Kiker (Editor), and Richard J. Wenning (Editor), eds. Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas: Management Using Comparative Risk Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (NATO Science for ... Security Series C: Environmental Security). Springer, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

(Editor), Igor Linkov, Gregory A. Kiker (Editor), and Richard J. Wenning (Editor), eds. Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas: Management Using Comparative Risk Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (NATO Science for ... Security Series C: Environmental Security). Springer, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Sanderson, Benjamin Mark. Uncertainty Quantification in Multi-Model Ensembles. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.707.

Full text
Abstract:
Long-term planning for many sectors of society—including infrastructure, human health, agriculture, food security, water supply, insurance, conflict, and migration—requires an assessment of the range of possible futures which the planet might experience. Unlike short-term forecasts for which validation data exists for comparing forecast to observation, long-term forecasts have almost no validation data. As a result, researchers must rely on supporting evidence to make their projections. A review of methods for quantifying the uncertainty of climate predictions is given. The primary tool for quantifying these uncertainties are climate models, which attempt to model all the relevant processes that are important in climate change. However, neither the construction nor calibration of climate models is perfect, and therefore the uncertainties due to model errors must also be taken into account in the uncertainty quantification.Typically, prediction uncertainty is quantified by generating ensembles of solutions from climate models to span possible futures. For instance, initial condition uncertainty is quantified by generating an ensemble of initial states that are consistent with available observations and then integrating the climate model starting from each initial condition. A climate model is itself subject to uncertain choices in modeling certain physical processes. Some of these choices can be sampled using so-called perturbed physics ensembles, whereby uncertain parameters or structural switches are perturbed within a single climate model framework. For a variety of reasons, there is a strong reliance on so-called ensembles of opportunity, which are multi-model ensembles (MMEs) formed by collecting predictions from different climate modeling centers, each using a potentially different framework to represent relevant processes for climate change. The most extensive collection of these MMEs is associated with the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). However, the component models have biases, simplifications, and interdependencies that must be taken into account when making formal risk assessments. Techniques and concepts for integrating model projections in MMEs are reviewed, including differing paradigms of ensembles and how they relate to observations and reality. Aspects of these conceptual issues then inform the more practical matters of how to combine and weight model projections to best represent the uncertainties associated with projected climate change.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography