Academic literature on the topic 'Multi risk assessment'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Multi risk assessment.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Multi risk assessment"
Nicolis, Orietta, Jozef Kiseľák, Francesco Porro, and Milan Stehlík. "Multi-fractal cancer risk assessment." Stochastic Analysis and Applications 35, no. 2 (December 8, 2016): 237–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2016.1238766.
Full textKhatakho, Rajesh, Dipendra Gautam, Komal Raj Aryal, Vishnu Prasad Pandey, Rajesh Rupakhety, Suraj Lamichhane, Yi-Chung Liu, et al. "Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal." Sustainability 13, no. 10 (May 11, 2021): 5369. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13105369.
Full textReeves, Carla. "How multi-agency are Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Committees?" Probation Journal 60, no. 1 (February 17, 2013): 40–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0264550512470187.
Full textLi, Xiaopeng, and Fuqiu Li. "Reliability Assessment of Space Station Based on Multi-Layer and Multi-Type Risks." Applied Sciences 11, no. 21 (November 1, 2021): 10258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app112110258.
Full textChandani, Priyanka, and Chetna Gupta. "An Early Multi-Criteria Risk Assessment Model." Journal of Cases on Information Technology 21, no. 2 (April 2019): 51–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2019040104.
Full textStrecker, Stefan, David Heise, and Ulrich Frank. "RiskM: A multi-perspective modeling method for IT risk assessment." Information Systems Frontiers 13, no. 4 (May 4, 2010): 595–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9235-3.
Full textŠugareková, M. "Flood risk assessment methodology." IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1209, no. 1 (December 1, 2021): 012025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1209/1/012025.
Full textGallina, Valentina, Silvia Torresan, Alex Zabeo, Andrea Critto, Thomas Glade, and Antonio Marcomini. "A Multi-Risk Methodology for the Assessment of Climate Change Impacts in Coastal Zones." Sustainability 12, no. 9 (May 2, 2020): 3697. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12093697.
Full textHeck, Nadine, Michael W. Beck, Borja Reguero, Kerstin Pfliegner, Max Ricker, and Ruben Prütz. "Global climate change risk to fisheries – A multi-risk assessment." Marine Policy 148 (February 2023): 105404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105404.
Full textVlek, Charles A. J. "A multi-level, multi-stage and multi-attribute perspective on risk assessment, decision-making and risk control." Risk Decision and Policy 1, no. 1 (April 1, 1996): 9–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135753096348772.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Multi risk assessment"
Zhang, Su. "Quantitative risk assessment under multi-context environments." Diss., Kansas State University, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/18634.
Full textDepartment of Computing and Information Sciences
Xinming Ou
If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it. Quantifying security with metrics is important not only because we want to have a scoring system to track our efforts in hardening cyber environments, but also because current labor resources cannot administrate the exponentially enlarged network without a feasible risk prioritization methodology. Unlike height, weight or temperature, risk from vulnerabilities is sophisticated to assess and the assessment is heavily context-dependent. Existing vulnerability assessment methodologies (e.g. CVSS scoring system, etc) mainly focus on the evaluation over intrinsic risk of individual vulnerabilities without taking their contexts into consideration. Vulnerability assessment over network usually output one aggregated metric indicating the security level of each host. However, none of these work captures the severity change of each individual vulnerabilities under different contexts. I have captured a number of such contexts for vulnerability assessment. For example, the correlation of vulnerabilities belonging to the same application should be considered while aggregating their risk scores. At system level, a vulnerability detected on a highly depended library code should be assigned with a higher risk metric than a vulnerability on a rarely used client side application, even when the two have the same intrinsic risk. Similarly at cloud environment, vulnerabilities with higher prevalences deserve more attention. Besides, zero-day vulnerabilities are largely utilized by attackers therefore should not be ignored while assessing the risks. Historical vulnerability information at application level can be used to predict underground risks. To assess vulnerability with a higher accuracy, feasibility, scalability and efficiency, I developed a systematic vulnerability assessment approach under each of these contexts.
Juarez, Garcia Hugon. "Multi-hazard risk assessment : an interdependency approach." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/27271.
Full textBani-Mustafa, Tasneem. "Multi-Hazards Risk Aggregation Considering the Trustworthiness of the Risk Assessment." Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay (ComUE), 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019SACLC096.
Full textThis PhD thesis addresses the problem of Multi-Hazards Risk Aggregation (MHRA), which aims at aggregating the risk estimates from Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) models for the different contributors. The current practice of MHRA is based on a simple arithmetic summation of the risk estimates. However, the risk estimates are obtained from PRA models that have different degrees of trustworthiness, because of the different background knowledge they are based on. Ignoring this difference in MHRA could lead to misleading results for Decision-Making (DM). In this thesis, a structured framework is proposed to assess the level of trustworthiness, which risk assessment results are based on and to integrate it in the process of MHRA. The original scientific contributions are: (i) Factors contributing to the trustworthiness of risk assessment outcomes are identified and their criticalities are analyzed under different frameworks, to understand their influence on the risk results; (ii) An integrated hierarchical framework is developed for assessing the trustworthiness of risk analysis, based on the identified factors and related attributes; (iii) A reduced order model-based method is proposed to efficiently evaluate the trustworthiness of risk assessment in practice. Through the reduced-order model, the proposed method can limit the number of elements considered in the original risk assessment; (iv) A technique that combines Dempster Shafer Theory and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (namely, DSTAHP) is applied to the developed framework to assess the trustworthiness by a weighted average of the attributes in the framework: the AHP method is used to derive the weights of the attributes and the DST is used to account for the subjective uncertainty in the experts’ judgments for the evaluation of the weights; (v) A MHRA technique is developed based on Bayesian model averaging, to overcome the limitations of the current practice of risk aggregation that neglects the trustworthiness of the risk assessment of individual hazard groups; (vi) The developed framework is applied to real case studies from the Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) industry
Chiu, Kenneth. "Generalized Gaussian covariance analysis in multi-market risk assessment." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/35449.
Full textGehl, P. "Bayesian networks for the multi-risk assessment of road infrastructure." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2017. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1546080/.
Full textHahn, Lukas [Verfasser]. "Quantitative assessment of multi-year non-life insurance risk / Lukas Hahn." Ulm : Universität Ulm, 2019. http://d-nb.info/119313966X/34.
Full textHahn, Lukas Josef [Verfasser]. "Quantitative assessment of multi-year non-life insurance risk / Lukas Hahn." Ulm : Universität Ulm, 2019. http://d-nb.info/119313966X/34.
Full textPham, Hung Vuong <1988>. "Multi-risk assessment of freshwater ecosystem services under climate change conditions." Doctoral thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/17841.
Full textLARI, SERENA. "Multi scale heuristic and quantitative multi-risk assessment in the Lombardy region, with uncertainty propagation." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10281/7550.
Full textTerzi, Stefano <1988>. "Multi-risk assessment within the context of climate change in mountain regions." Doctoral thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/17837.
Full textBooks on the topic "Multi risk assessment"
Abella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede: International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.
Find full textAbella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede: International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.
Find full textAbella, Enrique Armando Castellanos. Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba. Enschede: International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 2008.
Find full textRen, Jingzheng, ed. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Assessment and Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78152-1.
Full textGul, Muhammet, Suleyman Mete, Faruk Serin, and Erkan Celik. Fine–Kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-criteria Occupational Risk Assessment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52148-6.
Full textAndy, Alaszewski, and English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting., eds. Risk assessment and management in multi-agency, multi-professional health care: Education and practice. London: English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, 1998.
Find full textR, Parkhurst Benjamin, Cadmus Group, and Water Environment Research Foundation, eds. Aquatic ecological risk assessment: A multi-tiered approach : project 91-AER-1. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation, 1996.
Find full textHmara, Ivan, and Viktor Strel'nikov. Environmental epidemiology and risk assessment. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1019063.
Full textOlsen, Odd Einar. Standardization and risk governance: A multi-disciplinary approach. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2020.
Find full textSETAC Workshop on Framework for Ecological Risk Management (1997 Williamsburg, Va.). A multi-stakeholder framework for ecological risk management: Summary of a SETAC technical workshop. Pensacola, FL: SETAC Press, 1998.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Multi risk assessment"
Zhang, Limin. "Multi-hazard Risk Assessment." In Desiderata Geotechnica, 227–36. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14987-1_27.
Full textMussen, Filip. "Benefit–Risk Assessment." In Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support Healthcare Decisions, 105–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47540-0_7.
Full textWilliams, Steve, and Berndt Müller. "Agents and Dementia — Smart Risk Assessment." In Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies, 277–84. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59294-7_22.
Full textCrawford-Brown, Douglas J., and Hwong-Wen Ma. "Multi-Pathway and Cumulative Risk Assessment." In Handbook of Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing, 417–37. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1727-6_18.
Full textBhunia, Gouri Sankar, and Pravat Kumar Shit. "Geospatial Technology for Multi-hazard Risk Assessment." In Advances in Geographic Information Science, 1–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75197-5_1.
Full textPeña, Neiler de Jesús Medina. "Adra-Adaptive Disaster Risk Assessment." In Adaptive Disaster Risk Assessment Combining Multi-Hazards With Socioeconomic Vulnerability and Dynamic Exposure, 199–210. London: CRC Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003220749-8.
Full textSchumann, Andreas H., and David Nijssen. "Application of Scenarios and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Tools in Flood Polder Planning." In Flood Risk Assessment and Management, 249–75. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9917-4_12.
Full textTaflanidis, Alexandros A., Gaofeng Jia, and Ioannis Gidaris. "Natural Hazard Probabilistic Risk Assessment Through Surrogate Modeling." In Multi-hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering, 59–86. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_4.
Full textBignami, Daniele Fabrizio. "Auditing and Analytical Procedure for Risk Indices Assessment." In Towards a Territorial Multi-Disaster Buildings’ Resistance Certification, 79–117. Milano: Springer Milan, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5223-9_4.
Full textTsakovski, Stefan, and Vasil Simeonov. "Hasse Diagram Technique Contributions to Environmental Risk Assessment." In Multi-indicator Systems and Modelling in Partial Order, 293–313. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8223-9_14.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Multi risk assessment"
Zhang, L. M., and S. Zhang. "Approaches to Multi-Hazard Landslide Risk Assessment." In Geo-Risk 2017. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784480731.025.
Full textSmagin, A. A., P. V. Bulychev, L. P. Suitkina, D. V. Khabarov, and M. V. Kochetkova. "Risk assessment in anesthesiology." In 2017 International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sibircon.2017.8109943.
Full textSchorner, Philip, Daniel Grimm, and J. Marius Zollner. "Towards Multi-Modal Risk Assessment." In 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iceccme55909.2022.9988483.
Full textSyrovatkin, Alexander. "Risk Assessment In Multi-period Models." In 2018 Eleventh International Conference "Management of large-scale system development" (MLSD 2018). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mlsd.2018.8551809.
Full textAvdeenko, T. V., M. A. Vasiljev, and J. O. Mamenko. "Intelligent Technologies in the Problem of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making on Field Tax Audit." In Advances in Management Science and Risk Assessment. Calgary,AB,Canada: ACTAPRESS, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2316/p.2011.704-037.
Full text"Controlled Environments For Cyber Risk Assessment Of Cyber-Physical Systems." In 2017 Summer Simulation Multi-Conference. Society for Modeling and Simulation International (SCS), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.22360/summersim.2017.scsc.003.
Full textMohammadian, Masoud. "Network Security Risk Assessment Using Intelligent Agents." In 2018 International Symposium on Agent, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isamsr.2018.8540557.
Full textALBULESCU, ANDRA-COSMINA, DANIELA LARION, and ADRIAN GROZAVU. "MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT OF THE SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF SCHOOL UNITS IN VASLUI CITY, ROMANIA." In RISK ANALYSIS 2020. Southampton UK: WIT Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/risk200021.
Full textKobzili, Elhaouari, Cherif Larbes, Billel Kellalib, Fethi Demim, Ahmed Allam, and Abdelghani Boucheloukh. "Multi Sensor Data Fusion With Risk Assessment." In 2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icaee47123.2019.9015084.
Full textXie Hui Li and Lei Wang. "Regional ecological risk assessment of multi-sources." In 2011 International Symposium on Water Resource and Environmental Protection (ISWREP). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iswrep.2011.5893452.
Full textReports on the topic "Multi risk assessment"
Coleman, Justin L., Chandu Bolisetti, Swetha Veeraraghavan, Carlo Parisi, Steven R. Prescott, and Abhinav Gupta. Multi-Hazard Advanced Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Tools and Applications. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1369534.
Full textAhmadalipour, Ali. Multi-dimensional Drought Risk Assessment based on Socio-economic Vulnerabilities and Hydro-Climatological Factors. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.5922.
Full textSett, Dominic, Florian Waldschmidt, Alvaro Rojas-Ferreira, Saut Sagala, Teresa Arce Mojica, Preeti Koirala, Patrick Sanady, et al. Climate and disaster risk analytics tool for adaptive social protection. United Nations University - Institute for Environment and Human Security, March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53324/wnsg2302.
Full textZareian, Farzin, and Joel Lanning. Development of Testing Protocol for Cripple Wall Components (PEER-CEA Project). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/olpv6741.
Full textSaha, Amrita, Marco Carreras, and John Thompson. A Multi-Phase Assessment of the Effects of COVID-19 on Food Systems and Rural Livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa. APRA, Future Agricultures Consortium, April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/apra.2022.011.
Full textThomas, Sandy, Peter Gregory, Sarah O’Brien, Catriona McCallion, Ben Goodall, Chun-Han Chan, and Paul Nunn. Rapid Evidence Review 1 on the Critical Appraisal of Third-Party Evidence. Food Standards Agency, June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46756/sci.fsa.elm525.
Full textSchiller, Brandon, Tara Hutchinson, and Kelly Cobeen. Cripple Wall Small-Component Test Program: Wet Specimens I (PEER-CEA Project). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/dqhf2112.
Full textSchiller, Brandon, Tara Hutchinson, and Kelly Cobeen. Cripple Wall Small-Component Test Program: Wet Specimens II (PEER-CEA Project). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/ldbn4070.
Full textSalavisa, Isabel, Mark Soares, and Sofia Bizarro. A Critical Assessment of Organic Agriculture in Portugal: A reflection on the agro-food system transition. DINÂMIA'CET-Iscte, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.15847/dinamiacet-iul.wp.2021.05.
Full textMazzoni, Silvia, Nicholas Gregor, Linda Al Atik, Yousef Bozorgnia, David Welch, and Gregory Deierlein. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Selecting and Scaling of Ground-Motion Records (PEER-CEA Project). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.55461/zjdn7385.
Full text