Academic literature on the topic 'Modified Cooper Harper Scale'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Modified Cooper Harper Scale.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Modified Cooper Harper Scale"
Kilmer, Kevin J., Robert Bateman, and Don Malzahn. "Techniques of Subjective Assessment: A Comparison of the SWAT and Modified Cooper-Harper Scales." Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 32, no. 2 (October 1988): 155–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193128803200233.
Full textMansikka, Heikki, Kai Virtanen, and Don Harris. "Comparison of NASA-TLX scale, modified Cooper–Harper scale and mean inter-beat interval as measures of pilot mental workload during simulated flight tasks." Ergonomics 62, no. 2 (January 27, 2019): 246–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1471159.
Full textWidyasti, Andhini Ayu, Sunardi Sunardi, and Tranggono Tranggono. "ANALISIS BEBAN KERJA BAGIAN PRODUKSI DENGAN METODE DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY WORKLOAD SCALE (DRAWS) DAN MODIFIED COOPER HARPER (MCH) DI PT. SENDANG BIRU TUBAN." JUMINTEN 2, no. 2 (March 31, 2021): 84–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.33005/juminten.v2i2.234.
Full textKleiner, Brian M., Colin G. Drury, Joseph Sharit, and Sara J. Czaja. "Evaluating the Effects of Automation on the Human Operator." Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 33, no. 11 (October 1989): 733–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193128903301123.
Full textCharkhandaz Yeganeh, Reza, Iraj Alimohammadi, Jamileh Abolghasemi, Zabiolah Damiri, Bahar Parsazadeh, and Negar Rahmani. "Validity and reliability of Verbal Online Subjective Opinion (VOSO) and Modified Cooper-Harper scales in measuring of mental workload." Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering 3, no. 3 (December 1, 2016): 24–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21859/johe-03038.
Full textJennings, S., G. Craig, Stephan Carignan, Kris Ellis, and D. Thorndycraft Qinetiq. "Evaluating control activity as a measure of workload in flight test." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 49, no. 1 (September 2005): 64–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120504900115.
Full textSusanto, Bagus Ady, Sunardi Sunardi, and M. T. Safirin. "ANALISIS BEBAN KERJA OPERATOR PRODUKSI KORAN DENGAN METODE DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY WORKLOAD SCALE (DRAWS) DAN MODIFIED COOPER HARPER (MCH) DI PT.TEMPRINA MEDIA GRAFIKA GRESIK." JUMINTEN 1, no. 6 (November 16, 2020): 49–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.33005/juminten.v1i6.133.
Full textHill, Susan G., Allen L. Zaklad, Alvah C. Bittner, James C. Byers, and Richard E. Christ. "Workload Assessment of a Mobile Air Defense Missile System." Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 32, no. 16 (October 1988): 1068–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193128803201616.
Full textByers, James C., Alvah C. Bittner, Susan G. Hill, Allen L. Zaklad, and Richard E. Christ. "Workload Assessment of a Remotely Piloted Vehicle (RPV) System." Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 32, no. 17 (October 1988): 1145–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193128803201704.
Full textBittner, Alvah C., James C. Byers, Susan G. Hill, Allen L. Zaklad, and Richard E. Christ. "Generic Workload Ratings of a Mobile Air Defense System (LOS-F-H)." Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 33, no. 20 (October 1989): 1476–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193128903302026.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Modified Cooper Harper Scale"
Friberg, Annika. "Interaktionskvalitet - hur mäts det?" Thesis, Malmö högskola, Fakulteten för teknik och samhälle (TS), 2009. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-20810.
Full textTechnical developments have led to the broadcasting of massive amounts of information, athigh velocities. We must learn to handle this flow. To maximize the benefits of newtechnologies and avoid the problems that this immense information flow brings, interactionquality should be studied. We must adjust interfaces to the user because the user does nothave the ability to adapt and sort overly large amounts of information. We must developsystems that make the human more efficient when using interfaces.To adjust the interfaces to the user needs and limitations, knowledge about humancognitive processes is required. When cognitive workload is studied it is important that aflexible, easily accessed and non assertive technique is used to get unbiased results. At thesame time reliability is of great importance. To design interfaces with high interaction quality,a technique to evaluate these is required. The aim of this paper is to establish a method that iswell suited for measurement of interaction quality.When measuring interaction quality, a combination of subjective and physiologicalmethods is recommended. This comprises a combination of Functional near-infraredspectroscopy; a physiological measurement which measures brain activity using light sourcesand detectors placed on the frontal lobe, Electrodermal activity; a physiological measurementwhich measures brain activity using electrodes placed over the scalp and NASA task loadindex; a subjective, multidimensional measurement based on card sorting and measures theindividual perceived cognitive workload on a continuum scale. Measuring with these methodscan result in an increase in interaction quality in interactive, physical and digital interfaces.An estimation of interaction quality can contribute to eliminate interaction errors, thusimproving the user’s interaction experience.
Conference papers on the topic "Modified Cooper Harper Scale"
Donmez, Birsen, M. L. Cummings, Hudson D. Graham, and Amy S. Brzezinski. "Modified Cooper Harper scales for assessing unmanned vehicle displays." In the 10th Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2377576.2377620.
Full textMitchell, David G. "Fifty Years of the Cooper-Harper Scale." In AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0563.
Full text"Handling Qualities Workshop: 40 Years with the Cooper-Harper Scale." In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-5934.
Full textCotting, M. Christopher. "UAV Performance Rating Scale Based on the Cooper-Harper Piloted Rating Scale." In 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-923.
Full textReports on the topic "Modified Cooper Harper Scale"
Donmez, Birsen, A. S. Brzezinski, Hudson Graham, and M. L. Cummings. Modified Cooper Harper Scales for Assessing Unmanned Vehicle Displays. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada531512.
Full textWarr, Dartanian, Herbert A. Cole, and Gary B. Reid. A Comparative Evaluation of Two Subjective Workload Measures: The Subjective Workload Assessment Technique and the Modified Cooper Harper Scale. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada289493.
Full text