Academic literature on the topic 'Migration tribunals'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Migration tribunals.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Migration tribunals"
1
Drumbl, Mark A. "Extracurricular International Criminal Law." International Criminal Law Review 16, no. 3 (May 27, 2016): 412–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01603005.
Full textAbstract:
This article unpacks the jurisprudential footprints of international criminal courts and tribunals in domestic civil litigation in the United States conducted under the Alien Tort Statute (ats). The ats allows victims of human rights abuses to file tort-based lawsuits for violations of the laws of nations. While diverse, citations to international cases and materials in ats adjudication cluster around three areas: (1) aiding and abetting as a mode of liability; (2) substantive legal elements of genocide and crimes against humanity; and (3) the availability of corporate liability. The limited capacity of international criminal courts and tribunals portends that domestic tort claims as avenues for redress of systematic human rights abuses will likely grow in number. The experiences of us courts of general jurisdiction as receivers of international criminal law instruct upon broader patterns of transnational legal migration and reveal an unanticipated extracurricular legacy of international criminal courts and tribunals.
2
Hastie, Bethany. "The Inequality of Low-Wage Migrant Labour: Reflections onPN v FRandOPT v Presteve Foods." Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 33, no. 2 (August 2018): 243–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cls.2018.10.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis article explores the inequality inhering to low-wage migrant labour and critically evaluates the current capacity of human rights law to account for and address this inequality. This article uses two recent human rights tribunal decisions as case studies through which to conduct this examination:PN v FR, 2015 BCHRT 60, andOPT v Presteve Foods Ltd, 2015 HRTO 675. While these cases establish the positive role of human rights law in accounting for the wider context in which inequality impacts on migrant labour, this role is also inherently limited by the purpose, scope, and function of the Tribunals. This article will identify and discuss issues illustrated in the cases that are reflective of deeper systemic and structural inequalities attending low-wage migrant labour, including: the underlying reasons motivating low-wage labour migration; the legal regulations governing migrant workers’ status and employment conditions; and, the racialization of migrant workers.
3
Ogawa, Megumi. "Notice of invitation to appear: the statutory notice period in the Migration Review Tribunal and the Refugee Review Tribunal in Australia." International Journal of Public Law and Policy 3, no. 3 (2013): 287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijplap.2013.054746.
Full text
4
Segrave, Marie, Helen Forbes-Mewett, and Chloe Keel. "Migration Review Tribunal Decisions in Student Visa Cancellation Appeals: Sympathy, Hardship and Exceptional Circumstances." Current Issues in Criminal Justice 29, no. 1 (July 2017): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2017.12036082.
Full text
5
Fournier, Pascale. "Courtiser Dieu devant les tribunaux occidentaux." Canadian journal of law and society 25, no. 2 (August 2010): 167–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0829320100010371.
Full textAbstract:
RésuméÀ travers la migration d'une institution juridique spécifique—le Mahr (une forme de dot), cet article s'intéresse à la manière dont le mariage musulman voyage vers le Canada, les États-Unis, la France et l'Allemagne, offrant une panoplie d'images, de contradictions et de considérations distributives dans le transit du droit de la famille musulman au processus adjudicatif occidental. J'insiste sur l'importance d'orienter le débat sur les conséquences judiciaires distributives telles que vécues par les femmes musulmanes plutôt que sur la théorie de la reconnaissance. Cet article présente une contribution méthodologique importante relativement au rôle de la politique identitaire et de l'(im)possibilité des transferts juridiques en droit comparé. Par sa fenêtre ouverte et intime sur l'interaction entre le droit islamique et le droit occidental, la présente étude jurisprudentielle révèle que le Mahr ne peut voyager en terre occidentale sans transplanter une interaction hautement complexe entre des parties dont les intérêts sont souvent opposés quant à sa reconnaissance. Une analyse distributive empruntant au réalisme juridique s'impose en la matière, en raison du fait que le Mahr est d'ordinaire utilisé par les parties comme outil de négociation relativement à leurs obligations contractuelles familiales. De plus, le droit islamique se déplace avec une multiplicité de voix et c'est cette hybridité complexe qui sera reçue et interprétée par les tribunaux occidentaux.
6
CASTILLA JUÁREZ, Karlos A. "Migración irregular y políticas migratorias bajo el análisis de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos: el caso Nadege Dorzema y otros." RVAP 95, no. 95 (April 30, 2013): 125–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.47623/ivap-rvap.95.2013.05.
Full textAbstract:
LABURPENA: Egoera irregularreko etorkinak zaurgarritasun handiko egoeretan egoten dira, eta benetako aukera gutxi dute justiziaz eraginkorki baliatzeko. Horren ondorioz, auzitegietan gutxitan kontuan hartu dira haien aurka egindako giza eskubideen urraketak. Horregatik, garrantzitsua da jakitea Giza Eskubideetarako Inter-amerikar Auzitegiak Nadege Dorzema eta beste batzuk kasuan emandako epaiaren norainokoa eta zer-nolakoa, auzitegi horren auzietako jurisprudentzia-historiaren 25 urteetan gai hori aztertu duen bigarren kasua izan baita. Horiek horrela, artikulu honetan labur aztertzen da migratzaileekin zerikusia duen inter-amerikar jurisprudentzia, eta Nadege kasuan emandako epaiaren edukia oinarri hartuta, migrazio irregularraren azterketa Amerikako giza eskubideen auzitegian gaur egun zer egoeratan dagoen zehazten da. RESUMEN: Las personas migrantes en situación irregular suelen encontrarse en condiciones de alta vulnerabilidad y con pocas opciones reales para acceder de manera efectiva a la justicia. Ello ha generado que sean pocos los casos en los cuales los tribunales han conocido de violaciones de derechos humanos cometidas en contra de éstas. De ahí, la importancia de conocer el alcance y sentido de la sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el caso Nadege Dorzema y otros, al ser apenas el segundo caso en 25 años de historia jurisprudencial contenciosa de ese tribunal en el que se ocupa de dicho tema. Así las cosas, en este artículo se hace un breve repaso a la jurisprudencia interamericana relacionada con personas migrantes, para determinar a partir del contenido de la sentencia del caso Nadege, el estado actual que guarda el análisis de la migración irregular en el tribunal de derechos humanos de América. ABSTRACT: Irregular migrant persons usually find themselves in highly vulnerable conditions and with few real options to effectively gain access to justice. That has caused almost no cases where courts get to know human rights violations committed against them. That is why it is so important to know the scope and significance of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights judgment in case Nadege Dorzeman and others due to the fact that is only the second case in 25 years of contentious case law history of that court where it deals with such an issue. That being said, this article reviews the Inter-American case law related to migrant persons in order to establish according to the ruling in Nadege the current state regarding the analysis of irregular migration in the American court of Human Rights.
7
CHETAIL, VINCENT. "Is There any Blood on my Hands? Deportation as a Crime of International Law." Leiden Journal of International Law 29, no. 3 (July 28, 2016): 917–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156516000376.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe present article revisits international criminal law as a tool for sanctioning the most patent abuses against migrants. Although deportation is traditionally considered as an attribute of the state inherent to its territorial sovereignty, this prerogative may degenerate into an international crime. The prohibition of deportation has been a well-established feature of international criminal law since the Nuremberg trials following the Second World War. This prohibition has been further refined over the past 15 years by an extensive jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court.Against such a background, this article demonstrates that, in some circumstances, deportation may amount to a war crime, a crime against humanity or even a crime of genocide, depending on the factual elements of the case and the specific requirements of the relevant crime. This article accordingly reviews the constitutive elements of each crime and transposes them into the context of migration control. It highlights in turn that, although its potential has been neglected by scholars and practitioners, international criminal law has an important role to play for domesticating the state's prerogative of deportation and infusing the rule of law into the field of migration. The article concludes that there are reasonable grounds for asserting that a crime against humanity would have been committed in the Dominican Republic and Australia with regard to their deportation policy.
8
Ozyurek, Sherene, and Rodger Fernandez. "Combatting fraud as a disincentive of an unintended economic migrant: A comparative review of the direct Turkish model and the indirect Australian model." BORDER CROSSING 6, no. 1 (May 1, 2016): 16–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.33182/bc.v6i1.505.
Full textAbstract:
Under the new Turkish Law on Foreigners and International Protection (Article 54) represents a rapid deterrent approach as the consequences of fraud are implemented within 30 days. In contrast to the Turkish approach, Public Interest Criteria 4020 used in Australian law implies a lengthy process that may take up to two years. A quantitative analysis of retrospective data (2010-2014) of the Australian Migration Review Tribunal substantiated the notion that in contrast to the Turkish model, the Australian model is used as a procrastinating tool to the advantage of unintended economic migrants to remain in Australia.
9
Gabriel, Ambroise Dorino. "Les sous-entendus de l’Arrêt TC/0168/13 du Tribunal constitutionnel dominicain." Anthropologie et Sociétés 41, no. 1 (June 21, 2017): 203–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1040274ar.
Full textAbstract:
La République dominicaine et Haïti, depuis leur naissance, d’abord en tant que colonies de deux puissances coloniales antagoniques (l’Espagne et la France), puis en tant que républiques libérées du colonialisme et de l’esclavagisme brutal au début du XIXe siècle, vivent dans une tension constante. L’histoire de ces deux petits pays partageant la même île et qui ensemble ne mesurent que quelque 77 000 kilomètres carrés, rapporte que cette tension irrésolue et liée principalement à la question de la migration des Haïtiens vers la partie est de l’île fait partie inhérente de la politique économique depuis l’occupation américaine de 1915-1934. Elle est maintenue et nourrie par les élites économiques et politiques des deux pays au service du capital multinational. Elle est utilisée pour camoufler les enjeux économiques, pour contrôler la mobilité des travailleurs esclaves et légitimer les accrocs aux respects des droits humains sur l’île. Le massacre des Haïtiens et des Dominicains noirs en 1937 et l’arrêt du Tribunal constitutionnel dominicain en 2013 enlevant leur nationalité à des milliers de Dominicains d’origine haïtienne doivent être interprétés à partir d’une même logique économique : se débarrasser du surplus de population jugée indésirable sous la couverture de la souveraineté politique et ethnique. Mais cette notion archaïque de souveraineté est démasquée, car la résistance est sortie de sa peur paralysante, et l’exploité se découvre sujet de droits et réclame sa place légitime.
10
Jimenez, Estibaliz. "La criminalisation du trafic de migrants au Canada." Criminologie 46, no. 1 (April 30, 2013): 131–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1015296ar.
Full textAbstract:
La migration irrégulière est perçue par la communauté internationale comme un enjeu sécuritaire. La criminalisation de l’immigration devient alors un outil de contrôle migratoire et de sécurisation des frontières. Au cours des dernières années, le Canada a adopté une approche punitive et un recours plus important à la criminalisation de l’immigration irrégulière, avec des peines pouvant atteindre l’emprisonnement à vie. Paradoxalement, malgré un renforcement normatif, dont l’adoption de peines minimales obligatoires et l’augmentation des peines maximales, les tribunaux canadiens imposent aux passeurs des peines d’emprisonnement de courte durée et généralement des peines d’emprisonnement avec sursis à purger dans la collectivité. Le présent article présente les résultats des analyses législatives et jurisprudentielles relatives au trafic de migrants au Canada. Les résultats démontrent que les peines octroyées par les tribunaux ne sont pas proportionnelles aux discours politiques et médiatiques alarmistes à l’égard de la menace que représente l’organisation de l’entrée illégale.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Migration tribunals"
1
Fleming, Gabriel Catherine. "Rival goals and values in administrative review: a study of migration decision making." University of Sydney. Law, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/839.
Full textAbstract:
Some form of administrative review of executive action is accepted in the common law world for the reason that it serves certain basic values and goals. This study draws on political, legal and management theory in considering the values that underlie administrative review. It is primarily concerned with the role of tribunal review. A full range of values are considered, including fairness, justice, consistency, rationality, dignity, respect, accessibility, equity, efficiency and economy. Some are seen as fundamental to the administrative review system while others have different purposes. There is general agreement on many of the values and goals of administrative review. In their practical application however, values compete, overlap and evolve in accordance with economic, social, political and legal change. There are value tensions in, for instance, the role of independent tribunals as a check on the power of the executive while they are also within the executive, in the extent of the obligation on administrative tribunals to apply government policy and in the setting of proper limits of judicial review. There is continuing tension in demands for individual dignity and rights to fair treatment on the one hand and notions of the 'public interest' on the other. This thesis argues that the provision of tribunal review of administrative decisions is increasingly ideologically driven and focussed on 'functional' or 'management' values. At times these have trumped other values in decisions about entitlements to procedural fairness, access to review, effectiveness in public administration and the achievement of the 'correct and preferable' decision in the instant case. The focus of this thesis is a case study of migration decision-making. The importance of this area of study is evident in the potentially devastating consequences that migration decisions can have for individuals and families. In the context of Australia's history of inadequate and racially based migration policies, independent administrative review provides security against arbitrariness and discrimination in decision-making. An analysis of administrative review of decisions made under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by the Migration Review Tribunal, and its predecessor the Immigration Review Tribunal, illustrates the claim that values, in their application, have real, practical and local importance. Issues of tribunal independence and accountability, the normative goal of review and procedural justice are considered in depth. It is argued that where compromises are made in administrative review, underlying values should be revealed so that their practical consequences may be better understood. The need to articulate and analyze these issues has never been greater. The Australian administrative review system is in a period of change analogous to that of the introduction of the 'new' administrative law in the 1970s. If tribunals are to continue to play an effective role then it is important to think clearly about how they can, in practice, embody the right mix of administrative law values.
Books on the topic "Migration tribunals"
1
Doma, Bhutia, and Human Rights Law Network (New Delhi, India), eds. Independent People's Tribunal on Dams, Environment & Displacement. New Delhi: Human Rights Law Network, 2012.
Find full text
2
Administrative justice and asylum appeals: A study of tribunal adjudication. Oxford: Hart, 2011.
Find full text
3
United States. Congress. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Implementation of the Helsinki accords: Hearing before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, prospects for a war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, April 21, 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O., 1993.
Find full text
4
Implementation of the Helsinki accords: Hearing before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, prospects for a war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, April 21, 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. G.P.O., 1993.
Find full text
5
Ziccardi Capaldo, Giuliana, ed. The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2019. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513552.001.0001.
Full textAbstract:
The 2019 edition of the Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence both updates readers on the important work of long-standing international tribunals and introduces readers to more novel topics in international law. The Yearbook continues to provide expert coverage of the Court of Justice of the European Union and diverse tribunals from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to criminal tribunals such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (MICT), to international courts of human rights (ECtHR, IACtHR, ACtHPR), to economically based tribunals such as ICSID and the WTO Dispute Resolution panel. This edition contains original research articles on the development and analysis of the concept of global law and the views of the global law theorists such as: a judicial knowledge-sharing process as a tool for courts working together in a universal constitutional structure; the key insights emerging from the Global Environment Outlook-6, and the progress that has been made in international environmental law; the role of human rights treaty monitoring bodies in the international legal order; and an examination of the consequences of the UN Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration on international law. The Yearbook provides students, scholars, and practitioners alike a valuable combination of expert discussion and direct quotes from the court opinions to which that discussion relates, as well as an annual overview of the process of cross-fertilization between international courts and tribunals.
Book chapters on the topic "Migration tribunals"
1
Pearson, Linda. "‘Fair is foul and foul is fair’: Migration tribunals and a fair hearing." In Modern Administrative Law in Australia, 416–39. Cambridge University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107445734.022.
Full text
2
Vosko, Leah F. "Maintaining a Bargaining Unit of Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (Sawp) Employees." In Disrupting Deportability, 65–83. Cornell University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501742132.003.0004.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter analyzes how threats and acts of blacklisting impeded the fair application of the collective agreement between UFCW Local 1518 and Sidhu & Sons. The detection and analysis of the blacklisting of bargaining unit members at Sidhu uncover important “truths” about the management of migration among temporary migrant workers with the prospect of return. Broadly, it demonstrates that institutionalized programs' mechanisms, promoted in the global policy discourse embracing migration management as a means of stemming the flow of “irregular migration,” can impede access to and the exercise of labor rights. More narrowly, it shows that SAWP's “best practices” are by no means neutral, but are instead consistent with the dynamics of global capitalism, producing a race to the bottom in conditions of work and employment. This model temporary migrant work program (TMWP) permits state officials to behave in unprincipled ways that can involve, among other things, defying collective agreement provisions by delegating key responsibilities related to readmission—such as recruitment, selection, and aspects of documentation—to those in the interior and posted abroad. It also illustrates vividly how a labor relations tribunal compelled to prioritize national, and thereby sending-state, sovereignty, can be inhibited in—and even prevented from—implementing and enforcing host-state labor laws under its oversight.
3
"Access To An Effective Remedy Before A Court Or Tribunal In Asylum Cases." In The First Decade of EU Migration and Asylum Law, 401–36. Brill | Nijhoff, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004212039.i-485.102.
Full text
4
Drumbl, Mark. "Meandering Jurisprudence and Unanticipated Legacies." In Legacies of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 130–46. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862956.003.0009.
Full textAbstract:
Assessments of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia’s (ICTY) jurisprudential legacy tend to focus on the ICTY’s relationships with domestic criminal law. This chapter turns a new corner by examining the ICTY’s unexpected footprints in domestic civil litigation, specifically private tort claims brought in the US under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS, or Alien Tort Claims Act). Incorporation of international (including ICTY) materials in US ATS litigation remains a contested matter in which individual judges (both trial judges and appellate judges) demonstrate idiosyncratic behaviour. Some are ‘international law ignorers’, some are ‘international law enforcers’, some are ‘international law translators’, and some are ‘international law creators’. On this note, the ICTY’s legacy also touches upon broader questions of public international law and transnational legal migrations.
Reports on the topic "Migration tribunals"
1
Sheridan, Anne. Annual report on migration and asylum 2016: Ireland. ESRI, November 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.26504/sustat65.
Full textAbstract:
The Annual Report on Migration and Asylum 2016 provides an overview of trends, policy developments and significant debates in the area of asylum and migration during 2016 in Ireland. Some important developments in 2016 included: The International Protection Act 2015 was commenced throughout 2016. The single application procedure under the Act came into operation from 31 December 2016. The International Protection Office (IPO) replaced the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC) from 31 December 2016. The first instance appeals body, the International Protection Appeals Tribunal (IPAT), replacing the Refugee Appeals Tribunal (RAT), was established on 31 December 2016. An online appointments system for all registrations at the Registration Office in Dublin was introduced. An electronic Employment Permits Online System (EPOS) was introduced. The Irish Short Stay Visa Waiver Programme was extended for a further five years to October 2021. The Second National Action Plan to Prevent and Combat Human Trafficking was published. 2016 was the first full year of implementation of the Irish Refugee Protection Programme (IRPP). A total of 240 persons were relocated to Ireland from Greece under the relocation strand of the programme and 356 persons were resettled to Ireland. Following an Oireachtas motion, the Government agreed to allocate up to 200 places to unaccompanied minors who had been living in the former migrant camp in Calais and who expressed a wish to come to Ireland. This figure is included in the overall total under the IRPP. Ireland and Jordan were appointed as co-facilitators in February 2016 to conduct preparatory negotiations for the UN high level Summit for Refugees and Migrants. The New York Declaration, of September 2016, sets out plans to start negotiations for a global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration and a global compact for refugees to be adopted in 2018. Key figures for 2016: There were approximately 115,000 non-EEA nationals with permission to remain in Ireland in 2016 compared to 114,000 at the end of 2015. Net inward migration for non-EU nationals is estimated to be 15,700. The number of newly arriving immigrants increased year-on-year to 84,600 at April 2017 from 82,300 at end April 2016. Non-EU nationals represented 34.8 per cent of this total at end April 2017. A total of 104,572 visas, both long stay and short stay, were issued in 2016. Approximately 4,127 persons were refused entry to Ireland at the external borders. Of these, 396 were subsequently admitted to pursue a protection application. 428 persons were returned from Ireland as part of forced return measures, with 187 availing of voluntary return, of which 143 were assisted by the International Organization for Migration Assisted Voluntary Return Programme. There were 532 permissions of leave to remain granted under section 3 of the Immigration Act 1999 during 2016. A total of 2,244 applications for refugee status were received in 2016, a drop of 32 per cent from 2015 (3,276). 641 subsidiary protection cases were processed and 431 new applications for subsidiary protection were submitted. 358 applications for family reunification in respect of recognised refugees were received. A total of 95 alleged trafficking victims were identified, compared with 78 in 2015.