Academic literature on the topic 'Microbiota'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Microbiota.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Microbiota"
Moeller, Andrew H., and Jon G. Sanders. "Roles of the gut microbiota in the adaptive evolution of mammalian species." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375, no. 1808 (August 10, 2020): 20190597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0597.
Full textKhavkin, A. I., E. V. Shrainer, K. M. Nikolaichuk, I. A. Pak, V. V. Dudurich, A. V. Ponomarenko, E. А. Yakovets, and E. A. Pokushalov. "Gut microbiota and obesity." Voprosy dietologii 14, no. 2 (2024): 36–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.20953/2224-5448-2024-2-36-49.
Full textSalas-González, Isai, Guilhem Reyt, Paulina Flis, Valéria Custódio, David Gopaulchan, Niokhor Bakhoum, Tristan P. Dew, et al. "Coordination between microbiota and root endodermis supports plant mineral nutrient homeostasis." Science 371, no. 6525 (November 19, 2020): eabd0695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abd0695.
Full textAmarachukwu Bernaldine Isiaka, Vivian Nonyelum Anakwenze, Ugonna Henry Uzoka, Chiamaka Rosemary Ilodinso, Mercy Oluwayomi Oso, Chito Clare Ekwealor, and Chikodili Gladys Anaukwu. "Exploring the role of gut microbiota in human health." GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences 27, no. 1 (April 30, 2024): 051–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2024.27.1.0100.
Full textBritton, Graham J., Eduardo J. Contijoch, Matthew P. Spindler, Varun Aggarwala, Belgin Dogan, Gerold Bongers, Lani San Mateo, et al. "Defined microbiota transplant restores Th17/RORγt+regulatory T cell balance in mice colonized with inflammatory bowel disease microbiotas." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 35 (August 18, 2020): 21536–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922189117.
Full textInoue, Yuzaburo, and Naoki Shimojo. "Microbiome/microbiota and allergies." Seminars in Immunopathology 37, no. 1 (October 18, 2014): 57–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00281-014-0453-5.
Full textThomas, Linda V., Theo Ockhuizen, and Kaori Suzuki. "Exploring the influence of the gut microbiota and probiotics on health: a symposium report." British Journal of Nutrition 112, S1 (June 23, 2014): S1—S18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007114514001275.
Full textViswanathan, Sathiyapriya, Sheetal Parida, Bhuvana Teja Lingipilli, Ramalingam Krishnan, Devendra Rao Podipireddy, and Nethaji Muniraj. "Role of Gut Microbiota in Breast Cancer and Drug Resistance." Pathogens 12, no. 3 (March 16, 2023): 468. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030468.
Full textCosta, Amanda Garcia da, Juliana Pelosi Martins, Maria Carolina Sticanele de Souza, Giovanna Queiroz Marques de Mendonça, and Mariana Leite Resende. "IMPACT OF SKIN MICROBIOTA ON DERMATOLOGICAL HEALTH." Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação 10, no. 4 (April 1, 2024): 01–09. http://dx.doi.org/10.51891/rease.v10i4.13449.
Full textElechi, Jasper Okoro Godwin, Rosa Sirianni, Francesca Luisa Conforti, Erika Cione, and Michele Pellegrino. "Food System Transformation and Gut Microbiota Transition: Evidence on Advancing Obesity, Cardiovascular Diseases, and Cancers—A Narrative Review." Foods 12, no. 12 (June 6, 2023): 2286. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12122286.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Microbiota"
Andrade, Marta Daniela Pereira. "Manipulação do microbioma como adjuvante em tratamentos de cancro." Bachelor's thesis, [s.n.], 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10284/10793.
Full textOs microrganismos presentes no microbioma humano coexistem em harmonia com o seu hospedeiro, mas podem, em determinadas circunstâncias, causar doença. O estudo do microbioma humano e, em particular, da microbiota intestinal está em franco desenvolvimento, tendo vindo a surgir novas evidências relativas à sua associação a diferentes patologias e ao seu papel na fisiologia humana. O microbioma humano é caracterizado pela sua complexa plasticidade e um aumento do seu conhecimento é visto como promissor para o entendimento de vários processos e doenças, incluindo cancro. A sua relação com a saúde é muito abrangente e ainda pouco conhecida. Inúmeros estudos são desenvolvidos como forma de explorar novas estratégias de tratamento. Além das intervenções já aplicadas, a manipulação do microbioma humano através do uso de probióticos e prebióticos, de uma combinação de ambos e do transplante de microbiota fecal (TMF), têm vindo a ser consideradas opções em relação e em complemento à antibioterapia para potenciar a eficácia dos tratamentos, reduzir a toxicidade e prevenir a carcinogénese. Nesta revisão, são apresentadas formas de manipulação do microbioma como adjuvantes ao tratamento do cancro.
Microorganisms present in the human microbiome coexist in harmony with their host but can be the origin of disease under certain circumstances. Study of the human microbiome and particularly of the intestinal microbiota is developing, with new evidence emerging regarding its association with different pathologies and its role in human physiology. Human microbiome is characterized by its complex plasticity and an increase in knowledge is seen as promising for the understanding of various processes and diseases, including cancer. Human microbiome relationship with health is very wide and still little known. Numerous studies are being carried out as a way to explore new treatment strategies. In addition to the interventions already applied: manipulation of the human microbiome using probiotics and prebiotics, a combination of both and the fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), are being considered options to support antibiotic therapy to enhance effectiveness of treatments, reduce toxicity and prevent carcinogenesis. In this paper, ways of manipulating the microbiome as a component of cancer treatment are presented.
N/A
Bilen, Melhem. "Description of the human gut microbiota by culturomics." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018AIXM0177/document.
Full textThe human gut microbiota has been correlated in general health and diseases. Thus its description became mandatory to better understand its role and therapeutic potential. However, metagenomics has previously showed to be able to generate a lot of data, of which some are meaningless and constituted the “Dark matter”. Thus, culturomics was developed to complement metagenomics by targeting previously uncultured bacterial species. Using culturomics, we described the human gut microbiota of Pygmy people and succeeded in isolating a significant number of bacterial species out of which 38 were new species. Comparing metagenomics results to culturomics data, we see that only 26% of the isolated species were recovered by metagenomics and that up to 59% of the Operational taxonomic units detected corresponded to new bacterial species isolated by culturomics either in this study or in previous ones
Routy, Bertrand. "Contribution of Gut Microbiota on Systemic Response to Anticancer Immonumodulatory Agents." Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay (ComUE), 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017SACLS398.
Full textIn oncology, a novel therapeutic era based on immune checkpoint blockades (ICB) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) or programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitory T-cell receptors has come of age. Targeting CTLA-4 or PD-1/PDL-1/PDL-2 unleashes T cells and restores antitumor immunity. However, 70% of patients will eventually progress and drug-induced autoimmune toxicities are frequent. Therefore, predictors of clinical benefit and strategies to safely enhance ICB efficacy are urgently needed. Multiple lines of evidence have shown that conventional chemotherapy, allogeneic transplantation and immune-based therapies (IL-10R blockade, anti-CTLA4 and PD1 Abs) rely upon the composition of the gut microbiota to exert their bioactivity. During my PhD, I showed in a cohort of 249 patients with advanced NSCLC, RCC and urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD-1/PDL-1 mAb that antibiotic (ATB) prescription before ICB decreased PFS from 3.5 months vs 4.1 months (p=0.017) and OS from 11.5 months vs 20.6 months (p<0.001) compared to patients without ATB. Next, using quantitative metagenomics by shotgun sequencing, we explored the microbiota composition of 153 patients with advanced NSCLC and RCC amenable to anti-PD-1 mAb. Akkermansia muciniphila was found to be strongly associated with favorable objective response rate and longer PFS. To validate the relevance of these clinical findings, we brought up two major lines of evidence. First, we demonstrated that in NSCLC patient, the presence of specific IFNγ+ memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells toward A. muciniphila predicted a longer PFS. Secondly, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was performed using patient feces to recolonize germ-free or ATB-treated mice in two tumor models. Feces from patients with clinical response conveyed a stronger immune response against the tumor compared to feces from non-responders. Subsequently, oral supplementation with A. muciniphila post-FMT with non-responder feces restored the efficacy of PD-1 blockade. In this setting, dendritic cells secreted more IL-12, increasing the recruitment of CCR9+CXCR3+CD4+ T lymphocytes from the mesenteric lymph nodes into tumor beds as well as an increase of CD4+/Treg ratio within the tumor bed of mice co-treated with anti-PD1 mAb and A. muciniphila. The discovery of immunogenic bacteria capable of predicting and increasing clinical benefit of ICB will help for the development of novel biomarker tools and a future therapeutic concept, whereby treatment of cancer can be improved by the modulation of gut microbiota. Keywords: NSCLC, RCC, Immune checkpoint blockades (ICB), immunotherapies, Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 (PD-1), Microbiota
Vigliotti, Chloé. "Etude de l'impact d'un changement de régime alimentaire sur le microbiome intestinal de Podarcis sicula." Thesis, Paris, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017MNHN0011/document.
Full textWe collected and compared intestinal microbiota and microbiomes from several Podarcis sicula lizards, which live in Croatian continental and insular populations. One of these populations has recently changed its diet over an 46 years timespan, switching from an insectivorous diet to an omnivorous one (up to 80% herbivorous). Diversity analyses of these microbial communities, based on the V4 region of their 16S rRNA, showed that the microbiota taxonomic diversity (or alpha diversity) is higher in omnivorous lizards (enrichment in methanogenic archaea) than in insectivorous ones. Besides, microbial communities seem weakly structured: 5 enterotypes are detected at the phylum level, and 3 major phyla (Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria) are present. However, neither diet, spatial or temporal origin, nor lizard gender correlate with significant differences in microbiota. Linear discriminant analyses with size effect, based on OTUs and functionally annotated reads from the microbiomes, suggest that Podarcis sicula diet change is associated to targeted changes of the abundance of some enzymes in the microbiomes. Such a result leads us to propose a hypothesis of targeted changes in the microbial communities of this non-model holobiont, instead of more radical transformations. On a more theoretical level, this thesis also proposes network models (Reads similarity networks and bipartite graphs) that can help improving microbiome analyses
Saborío, Montero Alejandro. "Study of the Host Genetic Control over the Ruminal Microbiota and their Relationships with Methane Emissions in Dairy Cattle." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/172633.
Full text[ES] El análisis del control genético del hospedador sobre su microbiota ha sido señalado recientemente como un tema prometedor en diferentes campos de estudio. La relación entre el holobionte hospedador-microbioma y los fenotipos en el ganado lechero podría conducir a nuevos conocimientos en los programas de selección genética. Dentro de esta tesis doctoral, se realizó la estimación y análisis a través de diferentes enfoques estadísticos con el objetivo de desentrañar el control genético del hospedador sobre la microbiota en ganado lechero. Además, se analizó el rasgo de concentración de metano como un fenotipo potencial para ser incluido en el programa de mejora de ganado lechero español. Mayor abundancia relativa de la mayoría de los eucariotas (principalmente protozoos ciliados y hongos) y algunas arqueas (Methanobrevibacter spp. Methanothermus spp. y Methanosphaera spp.) fueron factores de riesgo para ser clasificadas en la categoría alta. Se propuso un conjunto de modelos de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM) de tipo recursivo dentro de un marco de Cadenas de Markov Monte Carlo (MCMC) para analizar conjuntamente la relación hospedador-metagenoma-fenotipo. Se estableció un modelo bivariado no-recursivo como punto de referencia. La heredabilidad de CH4 se estimó en 0,12 ± 0,01 en ambos modelos, recursivo y no recursivo. Asimismo, las estimaciones de heredabilidad para la abundancia relativa de los taxones se superpusieron entre los modelos y variaron entre 0.08 y 0.48. Las correlaciones genéticas entre la composición microbiana y el CH4 variaron de -0,76 a 0,65 en el modelo bivariado no recursivo y de -0,68 a 0,69 en el modelo recursivo. Doce matrices de relación de microbiota (K) fueron construidas a partir de diferentes métricas de distancia del microbioma, con el objetivo de comparar su desempeño dentro de un marco de estimación de componentes de varianza para CH4 y toda la microbiota. Análisis de simulación (n = 1000) y datos reales fueron desarrollados considerando cuatro modelos posibles: un modelo genómico aditivo (GBLUP), un modelo de microbioma (MBLUP), un modelo de efectos genéticos y microbioma (HBLUP) y un modelo de efectos de interacción genético, microbioma y genético × microbioma (HiBLUP). Un nuevo término "Holobiabilidad" fue definido para referirse a la proporción de la varianza atribuible a los efectos del holobionte hospedador-microbioma. Las estimaciones a partir de datos reales usando HiBLUP variaron dependiendo de la K utilizada y estuvieron entre 0.15-0.17, 0.15-0.21 y 0.42-0.59 para heredabilidad, microbiabilidad y holobiabilidad, respectivamente. El conjunto de datos de microbioma fue agregado a través de análisis de componentes principales (PCA), en pocos componentes principales (PCs) que fueron utilizados como aproximaciones del metagenoma central. Parte de la variabilidad condensada en estos PC está controlada por el genoma de la vaca, con estimaciones de heredabilidad para el primer PC (PC1) de ~ 0,30 en todos los niveles taxonómicos, con una gran probabilidad (> 83%) de que la distribución posterior sea > 0,20 y con un intervalo de mayor densidad posterior al 95% (95% HPD) no conteniendo cero. La mayoría de las estimaciones de correlación genética entre PC1 y metano fueron grandes (>0,70) en todos los niveles taxonómicos, con la mayor parte de la distribución posterior (> 82%) siendo > 0,50 y con su 95% HPD no conteniendo cero. Estos resultados sugieren que todo el metagenoma del rumen regula recursivamente las emisiones de metano en las vacas lecheras, y que tanto el CH4 como las composiciones de la microbiota están parcialmente controladas por el genotipo del hospedador. Las variables agregadas (PC) propuestas podrían ser usadas en programas de mejora de animales para reducir las emisiones de metano en las generaciones futuras.
[CA] L'anàlisi del control genètic de l'hoste sobre la seva microbiota s'ha assenyalat recentment com un tema prometedor en diferents camps d'estudi. La relació entre el holobiont hoste-microbioma i els fenotips en bovins de llet podria conduir a nous coneixements en els programes de cria. Dins d'aquest doctorat es van realitzar tesis, estimacions i anàlisis mitjançant diferents enfocaments estadístics amb l'objectiu de desentranyar el control genètic de l'hoste sobre la microbiota en bestiar lleter. A més, es va analitzar el tret de concentració de metà com a fenotip potencial a incloure en el programa espanyol de cria de bestiar lleter. La major abundància relativa de la majoria dels eucariotes (principalment protozous i fongs ciliats) i algunes arquees (Methanobrevibacter spp. Methanothermus spp i Methanosphera spp.) Van ser factors de risc per classificar-se en les categories altes. Es va proposar un conjunt de models d'equacions estructurals (SEM) de tipus recursiu dins d'un marc de cadena Markov Monte Carlo (MCMC) per analitzar conjuntament la relació hoste-metagenoma-fenotip. Es van establir models no recursius com a referència. L'heretabilitat del CH4 es va estimar en 0,12 ± 0,01 en ambdós models, recursius i no recursius. De la mateixa manera, les estimacions d'heretabilitat de l'abundància relativa dels tàxons es van superposar entre models i van oscil·lar entre 0,08 i 0,48. Les correlacions genètiques entre la composició microbiana i el CH4 van oscil·lar entre -0,76 i 0,65 en els models bivariables no recursius i de -0,68 a 0,69 en els models recursius. Dotze matrius de relació de microbiota (K) de diferents mètriques de distància de microbiomes, amb l'objectiu de comparar el seu rendiment dins d'un marc d'estimació de components de variància per CH4 i anàlisi de microbiomes sencers en simulació (n = 1000, 25 rèpliques) i es van realitzar dades reals , considerant quatre possibles models: un model genòmic additiu (GBLUP), un model de microbioma (MBLUP), un model d'efectes genètics i microbiomes (HBLUP) i un model d'efectes d'interacció genètics, microbiomes i genètics × microbiomes (HiBLUP). Es va definir un nou terme "Holobiabilitat" per referir-se a la proporció de la variància fenotípica atribuïble als efectes holobiont del microbioma host. Les estimacions de dades reals mitjançant HiBLUP van variar en funció de la K utilitzada i van oscil·lar entre 0,15-0,17, 0,15-0,21 i 0,42-0,59 per heretabilitat, microbiabilitat i holobiabilitat, respectivament. El conjunt de dades de microbiomes es va agregar mitjançant l'anàlisi de components principals (PCA) en pocs components principals (PC) que es van utilitzar com a proxies del metagenoma principal. Part de la variabilitat condensada en aquestes PC està controlada pel genoma de la vaca, amb estimacions d'heretabilitat per a la primera PC (PC1) de ~ 0,30 a tots els nivells taxonòmics, amb una gran probabilitat (> 83%) de la distribució posterior> 0,20 i amb un 95% més alt interval de densitat posterior (95% HPD) que no conté zero. La majoria de les estimacions de correlació genètica entre PC1 i metà eren grans (>0,70) en tots els nivells taxonòmics, amb una gran part de la distribució posterior (> 82%)> 0,50 i amb un 95% de HPD que no contenia zero. Aquests resultats suggereixen que tot el metagenoma del rumen regula recursivament les emissions de metà en vaques lleteres i que tant el CH4 com les composicions de microbiota estan parcialment controlades pel genotip de l'hoste. Les variables agregades proposades (PC) es podrien utilitzar en programes de cria d'animals per reduir les emissions de metà en les generacions futures.
[EN] The analysis of the host genetic control over its microbiota has recently been pointed out as a promising theme in different fields of study. The relationship between the host-microbiome holobiont and phenotypes in dairy cattle could lead to new insights in breeding programs. Within this Ph.D. thesis, estimation and analysis through different statistical approaches were performed aiming to unravel the host genetic control over the microbiota in dairy cattle. Besides, methane concentration trait was analyzed as a potential phenotype to be included in the Spanish dairy cattle breeding program. Higher relative abundance of most eukaryotes (mainly ciliate protozoa and fungi) and some archaea (Methanobrevibacter spp. Methanothermus spp and Methanosphera spp.) were risk factors for being classified in the high categories. a set of structural equation models (SEMs) of a recursive type within a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework was proposed to jointly analyze the host-metagenome-phenotype relationship. Non-recursive models were set as benchmark. Heritability of CH4 was estimated at 0.12 ± 0.01 in both, the recursive and non-recursive, models. Likewise, heritability estimates for the relative abundance of the taxa overlapped between models and ranged between 0.08 and 0.48. Genetic correlations between the microbial composition and CH4 ranged from -0.76 to 0.65 in the non-recursive bivariate models and from -0.68 to 0.69 in the recursive models. Regardless of the statistical model used, positive genetic correlations with methane were estimated consistently for the 7 genera pertaining to the Ciliophora phylum, as well as for those genera belonging to the Euryarchaeota (Methanobrevibacter sp.), Chytridiomycota (Neocallimastix sp.) and Fibrobacteres (Fibrobacter sp.) phyla. Twelve microbiota relationship matrices (K) from different microbiome distance metrics were built, aiming to compare its performance within a variance component estimation framework for CH4 and whole microbiome analysis on simulation (n = 1000, 25 replicates) and real data were performed, considering four possible models: an additive genomic model (GBLUP), a microbiome model (MBLUP), a genetic and microbiome effects model (HBLUP) and a genetic, microbiome and genetic × microbiome interaction effects model (HiBLUP). A new term "Holobiability" was defined to refer to the proportion of the phenotypic variance attributable to the host-microbiome holobiont effects. Estimates from real data using HiBLUP varied depending on the K used and ranged between 0.15-0.17, 0.15-0.21 and 0.42-0.59 for heritability, microbiability and holobiability, respectively. The microbiome dataset was aggregated through Principal Component Analysis (PCA) into few principal components (PCs) that were used as proxies of the core metagenome. Part of the variability condensed in these PCs is controlled by the cow genome, with heritability estimates for the first PC (PC1) of ~0.30 at all taxonomic levels, with a large probability (>83%) of the posterior distribution being > 0.20 and with the 95% highest posterior density interval (95%HPD) not containing zero. Most genetic correlation estimates between PC1 and methane were large (>0.70) at all taxonomic levels, with most of the posterior distribution (>82%) being >0.50 and with its 95%HPD not containing zero. These results suggest that rumen's whole metagenome recursively regulate methane emissions in dairy cows, and that both CH4 and the microbiota compositions are partially controlled by the host genotype. The purposed aggregated variables (PCs) could be used in animal breeding programs to reduce methane emissions in future generations.
This research was financed by RTA2015-00022-C03-02 (METALGEN) project from the national plan of research, development and innovation 2013-2020 and the Department of Economic Development and Competitiveness (Madrid, Spain). We thank the regional Holstein Associations and farmers collaborating in the project. Computational support from the High-Performance Computing Centre in Galicia (Spain) is acknowledged. Alejandro Saborío-Montero acknowledges the scholarship from Universidad de Costa Rica for his doctorate studies which partially conducted to the progress of this study.
Saborío Montero, A. (2021). Study of the Host Genetic Control over the Ruminal Microbiota and their Relationships with Methane Emissions in Dairy Cattle [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/172633
TESIS
Compendio
Basqueira, Marcela de Souza. "Estudo da microbiota de pacientes portadores de doença de Chagas." Universidade de São Paulo, 2018. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/5/5134/tde-31102018-104149/.
Full textINTRODUCTION: Chagas disease is caused by the flagellate protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi (T.cruzi) and still represents a major public health problem with more than eight million people infected. Chagas cardiomyopathy pathogenesis is still not completely understood. Inflammation in the myocardium is intense in relation to the number of parasites present and progressive damage is also observed in other organs such as the esophagus and colon in 30% to 40% of the cases. Some studies are beginning to show that the immune response to a parasite may depend on the intestinal microbiota. However, there are no studies using NGS technology that describes the intestinal microbiota of Chagas disease. It is possible that a small change in intestinal peristalsis due to T cruzi infection may alter the colonization of some bacteria. These changes could cause changes in the reactivity of the immune system such as increasing the autoimmune response causing greater damage to the heart. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the intestinal microbiota according to the clinical form of Chagas disease, through amplification of the 16s ribosomal RNA gene and to evaluate its role in the pathogenesis of the disease. METHODS: A total of 114 individuals were selected, 30 of cardiac form of the disease, 11 with the digestive form (megacolon), 32 with indeterminate form and 31 healthy individuals (controls). Stool samples were collected and analysed for the microbiota using Ion Torrent sequencing technique. The results were analyzed by the QIIME software to determine the population of bacteria present in the samples. Statistical was performed using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test and Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: The relative frequency of the Verrucomicrobia phylum was significantly lower among the cardiac group when compared to control, indeterminate and digestive form. Our study suggest that the phylum Verrucomicrobia may play a role in the miocardio inflammation process in Chagas disease, however little is known about these bacteria to infer the mechanism
Glendinning, Laura. "Sheep lung microbiota." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/29541.
Full textDubois, Nancy E. "Identification of Optimal Stool Donor Health and Intestinal Microbiome Characteristics for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation:." Thesis, Boston College, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108352.
Full textBackground. Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) account for 20-30% of healthcare-acquired infections, resulting in serious patient and economic burdens. CDI incidence has grown rapidly due to overuse of antibiotics and an aging population, posing a significant public health threat. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using donor stool has demonstrated clinical efficacy rates up to 94% and long-term restoration of a healthy intestinal microbiome. Challenges with donor screening, lack of research about optimal stool donor characteristics and intestinal microbiome composition, and a poorly fit screening model, create barriers to the availability of FMT. Purpose. This study aimed to generate essential information about FMT donor characteristics predictive of passing the screening and donor intestinal microbiome compositions associated with FMT clinical efficacy. The primary aims were to 1) identify previously unstudied characteristics of prospective FMT donors that are predictive of passing a stool bank’s screening process; and 2) determine whether donor intestinal microbial diversity is related to FMT clinical efficacy in preventing recurrent CDI. Methods. This study was conducted as a secondary analysis on a cohort of previously screened donors (n=770). Aim 1 was tested through a logistic regression of donor characteristics (gender, age, body mass index, frequency of bowel movements, diet, tobacco and alcohol use, and seasonality) with screening outcomes. Aim 2 was tested through a simple regression evaluating donor intestinal microbial diversity and rates of FMT clinical efficacy. Results. One donor characteristic in the logistic regression, frequency of bowel movements (p = 0.018), was significantly predictive of whether a donor passed the screening. Specifically, donors who had fewer than two bowel movements per day were more likely to pass. All other characteristics were not predictive. Similarly, the linear regression evaluating alpha diversity and FMT clinical efficacy was not significantly predictive of clinical efficacy (p = 0.140). Conclusion. Findings were used to support recommendations for improving prospective donor screening that nurses and other clinicians can implement to decrease challenging logistics, reduce costs and barriers, and potentially increase FMT clinical efficacy
Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2019
Submitted to: Boston College. Connell School of Nursing
Discipline: Nursing
Collison, Matthew Geoffrey. "Human-microbiota interactions in health and disease : bioinformatics analyses of gut microbiome datasets." Thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10443/4154.
Full textPajecki, Denis. "Microbiota no megaesôfago chagásico." Universidade de São Paulo, 2001. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/5/5154/tde-17022002-163819/.
Full textThe stasis of saliva and swallowed food in the esophageal lumen of patients with chagasic megaesophagus causes: (1) bacterial overgrowth in the esophageal lumen, (2) recurring pulmonary aspirations and respiratory infections, (3) increased risk of surgical or endoscopic procedures if perforation occurs by the major possibility of contamination, and (4) the development of chronic inflammatory process in esophageal mucosa, that can predispose to the development of dysplasia and cancer. In spite of this, esophageal microbiota in the megaesophagus has never been studied. The aim of this study was to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the microbiota in chagasic megaesophagus in comparison to the normal esophagus. Twenty-five patients (10 men and 15 women) were prospectively studied, with ages varying from 24 to 74 years (=49,1), from March to September 2000. Fifteen patients with chagasic megaesophagus (MG), were divided into three sub- groups according to the grade of esophageal dilation: MG1 5 patients with megaesophagus grade I; MG2- 5 patients with megaesophagus grade II; MG3- 5 patients with megaesophagus grade III. Another group of ten patients without any esophageal disease was constituted in the Control Group (CG). The sample collection was performed using a method specially developed to avoid contamination with microorganisms of the oral cavity and oropharynx. After qualitative and quantitative analysis, the microorganisms found were described and classified as Gram positive aerobes, Gram negative aerobes, anaerobes and fungus. Statistical analysis using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was performed in order to find quantitative differences of microorganisms in the different groups. In CG 40% of the cultures were positive with predominance of the genus Streptococcus sp, in concentrations that varied from 101 to 102 cfu/ml. In MG, 93,3% of the cultures were positive, with great bacterial variability and predominance of a variety of aerobic Gram-positive (Streptococcus sp was the most common) and anaerobic bacteria (Veillonella sp was the most frequent), in concentrations that varied from 101 to 105 cfu/ml. The bacterial concentrations were generally more elevated in MG3 in comparison to MG1, MG2 and CG (p<0,05). It was concluded that patients with megaesophagus present a varied microbiota constituted mostly of aerobic Gram positive and anaerobic bacteria, in concentrations that vary with the megaesophagus dilatation degree. Some of the bacteria found in MG are able to metabolize nitrates intro nitrites, an important step in the formation of nitrosamines.
Books on the topic "Microbiota"
Marchesi, J. R., ed. The human microbiota and microbiome. Wallingford: CABI, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781780640495.0000.
Full textHakeem, Khalid Rehman, Gowhar Hamid Dar, Mohammad Aneesul Mehmood, and Rouf Ahmad Bhat, eds. Microbiota and Biofertilizers. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48771-3.
Full textFredricks, David N., ed. The Human Microbiota. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118409855.
Full textTannock, Gerald W., ed. Understanding the Gut Microbiota. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118801413.
Full textMaddela, Naga Raju, and Kadiyala Venkateswarlu. Insecticides−Soil Microbiota Interactions. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66589-4.
Full textDar, Gowhar Hamid, Rouf Ahmad Bhat, Mohammad Aneesul Mehmood, and Khalid Rehman Hakeem, eds. Microbiota and Biofertilizers, Vol 2. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4.
Full textGibson, Glenn R., and Marcel B. Roberfroid, eds. Colonic Microbiota, Nutrition and Health. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1079-4.
Full textSchwiertz, Andreas, ed. Microbiota of the Human Body. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4.
Full textPierre, Joseph F., ed. Metabolism of Nutrients by Gut Microbiota. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/9781839160950.
Full textNibali, Luigi, and Brian Henderson, eds. The Human Microbiota and Chronic Disease. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley &;#38; Sons, Inc., 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118982907.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Microbiota"
Friedrich, Anke. "Microbiota and Microbiome." In The Multiple Sclerosis Companion, 157–59. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67540-3_19.
Full textHangay, George, Susan V. Gruner, F. W. Howard, John L. Capinera, Eugene J. Gerberg, Susan E. Halbert, John B. Heppner, et al. "Microbiota." In Encyclopedia of Entomology, 2377. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_4592.
Full textMukherjee, Swapna. "Microbiota." In Current Topics in Soil Science, 185–92. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92669-4_17.
Full textKoren, Omry, and Ruth E. Ley. "The Human Intestinal Microbiota and Microbiome." In Yamada' s Textbook of Gastroenterology, 617–25. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118512074.ch32.
Full textAttur, Malavikalakshmi M., and Jose U. Scher. "Microbiome and Microbiota in Rheumatic Disease." In Infections and the Rheumatic Diseases, 11–19. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23311-2_2.
Full textStephens, Katherine, Gemma E. Walton, and Glenn R. Gibson. "Gastrointestinal microbiota." In Advanced Nutrition and Dietetics in Gastroenterology, 41–47. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118872796.ch1.8.
Full textMendling, Werner. "Vaginal Microbiota." In Microbiota of the Human Body, 83–93. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_6.
Full textJavaux, Emmanuelle J. "Gunflint Microbiota." In Encyclopedia of Astrobiology, 1–5. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_682-3.
Full textChu, Fong-Fong. "Gut Microbiota." In Encyclopedia of Cancer, 1–4. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27841-9_7172-4.
Full textJavaux, Emmanuelle J. "Gunflint Microbiota." In Encyclopedia of Astrobiology, 1026–30. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44185-5_682.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Microbiota"
Saliba, Leonardo Camargos, and KAREN RODRIGUES VIEIRA. "MICROBIOTA COMO FONTE IMUNOMODULADORA: NOVOS OLHARES SOBRE AS DOENÇAS EMERGENTES DO SÉCULO XXI." In II Congresso Nacional de Microbiologia Clínica On-line. Revista Multidisciplinar em Saúde, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51161/ii-conamic/6174.
Full textGODZIK, ADAM. "THE MICROBIOME(S): MICROBIOTA, FAMILIES, FUNCTIONS." In 23rd International Solvay Conference on Chemistry. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814603836_0022.
Full textLopes, Lorena Vieira, VINÍCIUS GRZECHOEZINSKI AUDINO, and GABRIEL STECHECHEN WIER. "EIXO INTESTINO-PULMÃO E O PAPEL DA MICROBIOTA INTESTINAL NA RESPOSTA À INFECÇÃO POR SARS-COV-2." In II Congresso Brasileiro de Imunologia On-line. Revista Multidisciplinar em Saúde, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51161/ii-conbrai/6286.
Full textMenezes, Carlos Alexandre Gomes Passarinho, Rafaela Ribeiro Benedito, Daniel Rubens Freitas Facundo, Isabela Oliveira Moura, Patrick Venâncio Soares Lima, Amandra Gabriele Coelho Rodrigues Melo, Bruna Gontijo Peixoto Pimenta, et al. "Analysis of the intestinal microbiota and its relationship with neuropathologies." In XIV Congresso Paulista de Neurologia. Zeppelini Editorial e Comunicação, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5327/1516-3180.141s1.458.
Full textAlencar, Artur Nogueira Matos, Rafael Del Bel Sonoda, Renato de Lima Rozenowicz, Juliana Cristina Marinheiro, and Heloísa Rosa. "O PAPEL DO MICROBIOMA NO DESENVOLVIMENTO DO CÂNCER DE MAMA: UMA ASSOCIAÇÃO POSSÍVEL?" In Congresso Médico Acadêmico da Universidade Nove de Julho. Universidade Nove de Julho, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/comamedvg.2022.23.
Full textPersia, Sabrina, Antonella Frassanito, Raffaella Nenna, Laura Petrarca, Greta Di Mattia, Antonella Merola, Valerio Iebba, et al. "Nasal microbiota in RSV microbiota." In ERS International Congress 2019 abstracts. European Respiratory Society, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4994.
Full textDias, Grazielle Suhett, Aline Sereia, Lais Yamanaka, Paloma Rubin, Ana Christof, and Luiz Felipe Valter de Oliveira. "Probiome: knowing our second genome, the gut microbiota." In XIII Congresso Paulista de Neurologia. Zeppelini Editorial e Comunicação, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5327/1516-3180.638.
Full textYin, Chuntao. "Disease-induced changes in the rhizosphere microbiome reduced root disease." In IS-MPMI Congress. IS-MPMI, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/ismpmi-2023-5r.
Full textFarah, Huda Mohamed, Muram Elmubarak Elamin, Rahaf Nader Nader Nader, Rana Said Alabsi, Salma Bouazza Bouabidi, Sara Elgaili Khogali Suleiman, Shahd Mohammad Nasr, Shouq Fahad Al-Rumaihi, Zain Zaki Zakaria, and Maha alasmakh Alasmakh. "Metagenomic Analysis of Oral Microbiome during pregnancy." In Qatar University Annual Research Forum & Exhibition. Qatar University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29117/quarfe.2021.0135.
Full textКарпин, Владимир Александрович, and Ольга Ивановна Шувалова. "INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA AND LIVER AND KIDNEY DISEASES." In Перспективные исследования в психологии, спорте и здравоохранении: сборник статей международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Май 2024), 39–42. Crossref, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.58351/240528.2024.39.50.003.
Full textReports on the topic "Microbiota"
Molina Montes, Esther. Microbioma, microbiota y cáncer. Sociedad Española de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, February 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18567/sebbmdiv_rpc.2018.02.1.
Full textAier, Chubanaro, Pazhuni Pfote, and Jeyaparvathi Somasundaram. ECONOMIC AND NUTRITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILOSAMIA RICINI RAISED ON CASTOR LEAVES FORTIFIED WITH PROBIOTICS - REVIEW. World Wide Journals, February 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.36106/ijar/9019083.
Full textTarabukina, N. P., M. P. Neustroev, and M. P. Skriabina. Microbiota formation in herd foals. СФНЦА РАН, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/978-5-6041597-2018-206-207.
Full textMizrahi, Itzhak, and Bryan A. White. Exploring the role of the rumen microbiota in determining the feed efficiency of dairy cows. United States Department of Agriculture, October 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2011.7594403.bard.
Full textDroby, S., J. L. Norelli, M. E. Wisniewski, S. Freilich, A. Faigenboim, and C. Dardick. Microbial networks on harvested apples and the design of antagonistic consortia to control postharvest pathogens. Israel: United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2020.8134164.bard.
Full textÁlvarez Mercado, Ana Isabel. Mejorar la salud de la microbiota para mantenernos sanos. Sociedad Española de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, June 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.18567/sebbmdiv_r.202406.
Full textNeyens, Jordan. Colorectal Cancer, Gut Microbiota, and Diet: What's the Connection? Ames (Iowa): Iowa State University, January 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/cc-20240624-382.
Full textguan, wenyu, xiaofei dang, weihua yang, yunshan wang, xiaoping wang, ruibin zhang, and chunling wu. Gut microbiota and its metabolites in CKD-related constipation. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, August 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2024.8.0088.
Full textSchokker, Dirkjan, Petra Roubos, Evelien Alderliesten, Arie Kies, Els Willems, and Mari Smits. Integration of multiple gut microbiota datasets of pigs and broilers. Wageningen: Wageningen Livestock Research, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/426339.
Full textTovani Palone, Marcos Roberto, and Vivian Patricia Saldias Vargas. Las fisuras labiopalatinas frente al equilibrio de la microbiota gastrointestinal. Buenos Aires: siicsalud.com, October 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.21840/siic/144114.
Full text