Journal articles: 'Methodologic'

1

Milliken, George A. "Methodologic issues." Statistics in Medicine 14, no. 5-7 (March 15, 1995): 701–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780140530.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Ikonovic, Vesna, and Dragica Zivkovic. "Methodologic-cartographic algorithm." Glasnik Srpskog geografskog drustva 88, no. 3 (2008): 11–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/gsgd0803011i.

Full text

Abstract:

Many famous world cartographers deal with definition and significance of cartographic method. Cartographic method is the one of the most important method of researching and knowledge of geospace. Like that it is applying in researching of all spatial sciences. By its usage we got 2D, 3D and 4D models of reality. The most importance cartographic models are maps and atlases.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Goodman, Steven N. "The Methodologic Ozone Effect." Epidemiology 16, no. 4 (July 2005): 430–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000165813.07327.35.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Shoemaker, William C. "Methodologic assessment of outcome." Critical Care Medicine 17, Supplement (December 1989): S169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198912001-00001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Rothman, Kenneth J. "Methodologic Frontiers in Environmental Epidemiology." Environmental Health Perspectives 101 (December 1993): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3431656.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Tanalp, AliCevat. ""Obesity paradox" or methodologic error." Annals of African Medicine 12, no. 3 (2013): 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1596-3519.117633.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Lehmann, Harold P., Karen A. Robinson, John S. Andrews, Victoria Holloway, and Steven N. Goodman. "Acne therapy: A methodologic review." Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 47, no. 2 (August 2002): 231–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2002.120912.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Rothman, K. J. "Methodologic frontiers in environmental epidemiology." Environmental Health Perspectives 101, suppl 4 (December 1993): 19–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.93101s419.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Weed, D. L. "Methodologic Guidelines for Review Papers." JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 89, no. 1 (January 1, 1997): 6–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/89.1.6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Hartz, Arthur, and J. L. Marsh. "Methodologic Issues in Observational Studies." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 413 (August 2003): 33–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000079325.41006.95.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Wilson, Holly Skodol, and Sally Ambler Hutchinson. "Methodologic Mistakes in Grounded Theory." Nursing Research 45, no. 2 (March 1996): 122–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199603000-00012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Kendler, Kenneth S. "Psychiatric Genetics: A Methodologic Critique." American Journal of Psychiatry 162, no. 1 (January 2005): 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.1.3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Hall, John C., Briony Mills, Nahn Nguyen, and Jane L. Hall. "Methodologic standards in surgical trials." Surgery 119, no. 4 (April 1996): 466–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80149-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Horwitz, Ralph I., and David F. Ransohoff. "Epidemiologic methods and methodologic vigilance." Journal of General Internal Medicine 3, no. 3 (May 1988): 298–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02596348.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Marsh, Gene W. "THEORY GENERATION THROUGH METHODOLOGIC FLEXIBILITY." Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 1, no. 4 (August 1987): 81–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005082-198708000-00010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Alberto Briganti, Felix K. H. Chun, and Luc Valiquette. "Outcomes Research: A Methodologic Review." European Urology 50, no. 2 (August 2006): 218–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Gelfand, DW, and DJ Ott. "Methodologic considerations in comparing imaging methods." American Journal of Roentgenology 144, no. 6 (June 1985): 1117–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.144.6.1117.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

MUKAN, Nataliya, Olena MUKAN, and Liliana LUTSIV. "The modern business-education: methodologic approaches." Humanities science current issues 2, no. 36 (2021): 272–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/36-2-44.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Christakis, Dimitri A., Brian D. Johnston, and Frederick A. Connell. "Methodologic Issues in Pediatric Outcomes Research." Ambulatory Pediatrics 1, no. 1 (January 2001): 59–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1367/1539-4409(2001)001<0059:miipor>2.0.co;2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Friedenreich, C. M. "Methodologic issues for pooling dietary data." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 59, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): 251S—252S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/59.1.251s.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Kittner, S. J., L. R. White, M. E. Farmer, M. Wolz, E. Kaplan, E. Moes, J. A. Brody, and M. Feinlieb. "Methodologic issues in screening for dementia." Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 1, no. 1 (1987): 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002093-198701000-00016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Nurminen, Markku, Tuula Nurminen, and Carlos F. Corvalán. "Methodologic Issues in Epidemiologic Risk Assessment." Epidemiology 10, no. 5 (September 1999): 585–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199909000-00028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Forker, Judith Erickson, and Mary E. McDonald. "Methodologic Trends in the Healthcare Professions." Nurse Educator 21, no. 4 (July 1996): 13–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006223-199607000-00008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Forker, Judith Erickson, and Mary E. McDonald. "Methodologic Trends in the Healthcare Professions." Nurse Educator 21, no. 5 (September 1996): 9–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006223-199609000-00006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Fasel, Jean H. D., Tanya Uldin, Paul Vaucher, Joerg Beinemann, Bojan Stimec, and Karl Schaller. "Evaluating Preoperative Models: A Methodologic Contribution." World Neurosurgery 89 (May 2016): 681–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Prisant, L. M., P. B. Bottini, and A. A. Carr. "Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Methodologic Issues." American Journal of Nephrology 16, no. 3 (1996): 190–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000168998.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Carpenter, W. T. "A Few Methodologic Issues of Note." Schizophrenia Bulletin 34, no. 6 (August 20, 2008): 1003–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn125.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Octaria, Rany, Peter F. Rebeiro, and Marion A. Kainer. "Methodologic Considerations for Small Cohort Studies." Clinical Infectious Diseases 69, no. 9 (March 10, 2019): 1644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz201.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Koretz, Ronald L. "Probiotics, Critical Illness, and Methodologic Bias." Nutrition in Clinical Practice 24, no. 1 (February 2009): 45–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0884533608329296.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Slott, Valerie L., Juan D. Suarez, and Sally D. Perreault. "Rat sperm motility analysis: Methodologic considerations." Reproductive Toxicology 5, no. 5 (January 1991): 449–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0890-6238(91)90009-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Hayman, James A. "Cost-effectiveness analyses: A methodologic review." International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 42, no. 1 (January 1998): 108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(98)80051-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Lamberti, J. S., S. B. Schwarzkopf, J. Crilly, R. Martin, and T. Mitra. "Methodologic issues in P50 sensory gating." Schizophrenia Research 6, no. 2 (January 1992): 164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0920-9964(92)90259-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Michael Bowling, J., Barbara K. Rimer, Elizabeth J. Lyons, Carol E. Golin, Gilles Frydman, and Kurt M. Ribisl. "Methodologic challenges of e-health research." Evaluation and Program Planning 29, no. 4 (November 2006): 390–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.08.011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Miransky, L. Jeremy. "Methodologic approaches to quality care evaluation." Cancer 64, S1 (July 1, 1989): 302–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19890701)64:1+<302::aid-cncr2820641327>3.0.co;2-b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Detrano, Robert. "Methodologic Problems in Exercise Testing Research." Archives of Internal Medicine 148, no. 6 (June 1, 1988): 1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1988.00380060053013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Allahabadi, Sachin, Sonali E. Feeley, Drew A. Lansdown, Nirav K. Pandya, and Brian T. Feeley. "Influential Articles on Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Bibliometric Analysis." Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 9, no. 6 (June 1, 2021): 232596712110107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211010772.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: The understanding of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and optimal treatment has evolved significantly. Influential articles have been previously evaluated using article citations to determine impact. Purpose: To identify and characterize the 50 most cited and recent influential articles relating to pediatric and adolescent ACL injuries, to examine trends in publication characteristics, and to evaluate correlations of study citations with quality of evidence. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The top 50 most cited articles on pediatric and adolescent ACL injuries were gathered using the Web of Science and Scopus online databases by averaging the number of citations from each database. Articles from recent years were also aggregated and sorted by citation density (citations/year). Publication and study characteristics were recorded. Level of evidence and methodologic quality were assessed where applicable using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS), modified Jadad scale, and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Spearman correlation was used to evaluate the association between citation data and level of evidence or methodologic quality scorings. Results: The top 50 cited papers had a mean of 117.5 ± 58.8 citations (range, 58.5-288.5 citations), with a mean citation density of 9.4 ± 5.4 citations per year (range, 2.9-25.8 citations/year); 80% were published in 2000 or later, and 6% were considered basic science. Articles were mainly level 4 evidence (27/42; 64.3%), and none was level 1. There were moderate, significant associations between publication year and level of evidence ( r S = −0.45; P = .0030) and citation density and publication year ( r S = 0.59; P < .001). Mean methodologic quality scores were as follows: mCMS, 53 ± 7.2 (range, 39-68); modified Jadad scale, 3.2 ± 1.1 (range, 2-6); and MINORS, 11.2 ± 3.2 (range, 6-20). There was a significant, strong correlation between rank of mean citations and modified Jadad scale ( r S = 0.76; P < .0001), suggesting poorer score associated with more mean citations. Conclusion: Influential articles on pediatric and adolescent ACL injuries were relatively recent, with a low proportion of basic science–type articles. Most of the studies had a lower evidence level and poor methodologic quality scores. Higher methodologic quality did not correlate positively with citation data.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Manchikanti, Laxmaiah. "Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument for Methodologic Quality Assessment of Nonrandomized Studies of Interventional Techniques." Pain Physician 3;17, no. 3;5 (May 14, 2014): E291—E317. http://dx.doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2014/17/e291.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: The major component of a systematic review is assessment of the methodologic quality and bias of randomized and nonrandomized trials. While there are multiple instruments available to assess the methodologic quality and bias for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there is a lack of extensively utilized instruments for observational studies, specifically for interventional pain management (IPM) techniques. Even Cochrane review criteria for randomized trials is considered not to be a “gold standard,” but merely an indication of the current state of the art review methodology. Recently a specific instrument to assess the methodologic quality of randomized trials has been developed for interventional techniques. Objectives: Our objective was to develop an IPM specific instrument to assess the methodological quality of nonrandomized trials or observational studies of interventional techniques. Methods: The item generation for the instrument was based on a definition of quality, to the extent to which the design and conduct of the trial were congruent with the objectives of the study. Applicability was defined as the extent to which procedures produced by the study could be applied using contemporary IPM techniques. Multiple items based on Cochrane review criteria and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM-QRBNR) were utilized. Results: A total of 16 items were developed which formed the IPM-QRBNR tool. The assessment was performed in multiple stages. The final assessment was 4 nonrandomized studies. The inter-rater agreement was moderate to good for IPM-QRBNR criteria. Limitations: Limited validity or accuracy assessment of the instrument and the large number of items to be scored were limitations. Conclusion: We have developed a new comprehensive instrument to assess the methodological quality of nonrandomized studies of interventional techniques. This instrument provides extensive information specific to interventional techniques is useful in assessing the methodological quality and bias of observational studies of interventional techniques. Key words: Methodological quality assessment, evidence-based medicine, comparative effectiveness research, Cochrane Reviews, interventional techniques, risk of bias assessment, nonrandomized trials, observational studies

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Miron Stefani, Cristine, Liliana Vicente Melo de Lucas Rezende, Lia Rosana Honnef, Luciana Butini Oliveira, Nathan Da Cruz Lopes, Carla Massignan, Graziela De Luca Canto, and Júlia Meller Dias de Oliveira. "Methodologic quality and risk-of-bias in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a review of methods." Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 4 (May 18, 2022): e4067. http://dx.doi.org/10.17267/2675-021xevidence.2022.e4067.

Full text

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions that assessed or did not methodologic quality/risk-of-bias of included studies. Additionally, to analyze methodologic features of those assessing the methodologic quality/risk-of-bias. METHODS: PubMed database was searched. From 25,571 systematic reviews retrieved, a random sample of 1,025 was screened. Frequencies were used to describe outcomes. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regressions were performed to test the associations with methodologic quality/risk-of-bias results assessment. In a second analysis, systematic reviews that assessed methodologic quality/risk of bias were dichotomized according to the design of included studies (randomized clinical trials-only versus non-randomized studies of intervention or a combination of both). RESULTS: 303 systematic reviews were fully analyzed. Methodologic quality/risk of bias was assessed by 278 (92%). Methodologic quality/risk-of-bias assessment was associated with a higher number of databases searched (>4, P= 0.008), the presence of meta-analysis (P= 0.005), and the design of included studies (randomized clinical trials-only, P= 0.042). The chance of using a suitable tool and a tool designed for risk-of-bias assessment rather than methodologic quality was higher for randomized clinical trials-only systematic reviews (P< 0.05). The most used tool was Cochrane’s RoB Tool without a clear studies’ overall risk classification system. CONCLUSION: methodologic quality/risk-of-bias assessment was associated with included studies’ design (randomized clinical trials-only), a meta-analysis of data, and the number of databases searched (>4). The most used tool was Cochrane’s RoB Tool, with no clearly defined rating system. Methodologic quality/risk-of-bias assessment methods description, results, and impacts on meta-analysis, the certainty of evidence, and systematic reviews’ results are still to be consistently addressed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Watine, Joseph, Bruno Friedberg, Eva Nagy, Rita Onody, Wytze Oosterhuis, Peter S. Bunting, Jean-Christophe Charet, and Andrea Rita Horvath. "Conflict between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners." Clinical Chemistry 52, no. 1 (January 1, 2006): 65–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.056952.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Background: It is not clear if good methodologic quality in current practice guidelines necessarily leads to more valid recommendations, i.e., those that are supported with consistent research evidence or, when evidence is conflicting or lacking, with sufficient consensus among the guideline development team. To help clarify this issue, we assessed whether there is a link between methodologic quality and recommendation validity in practice guidelines for the use of laboratory tests in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We conducted a systematic review of data on laboratory tests in NSCLC published in English or in French within the last 10 years and retrieved 11 practice guidelines for the use of these tests. The guidelines were critically appraised and scored for methodologic quality and recommendation validity based on the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria and on the systematic review. Results: Overall, these 11 guidelines had considerable shortcomings in methodologic quality and, to a lesser extent, in recommendation validity. Practice guidelines with the best methodologic quality were not necessarily the most valid in their recommendations, and conversely. Conclusions: Poor methodologic quality and lack of recommendation validity in laboratory medicine call for methodologic standards of guideline development and for international collaboration of guideline development agencies. We advise readers of guidelines to critically evaluate the methods used as well as the content of the recommendations before adopting them for use in practice.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Fritz, Gregory K., Keren Rosenblum, Robert B. Klein, Elizabeth L. McQuaid, Jack H. Nassau, Marianne Z. Wamboldt, Rick Carter, and Anthony Mansell. "Improved Methodology for Threshold Detection Studies in Asthmatic Children." Journal of Psychophysiology 15, no. 3 (July 2001): 190–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.15.3.190.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract This paper reports the differences between two methodologies for threshold detection of added resistive loads in children and adolescents. The first-generation apparatus utilized a series of laminar flow screens to present various total resistances, while in the second generation the apparatus utilized a servo-controlled cone that occluded an aperture to varying degrees. Protocol modifications in the second generation methodology included forced choice, attentional enhancements, and larger increments of added resistance. Two studies conducted 2 years apart provided data on the first and second generations of methodology. All participants in Study 1 (N = 33) and Study 2 (N = 33) were children with asthma. Subjects were matched for both age and asthma severity. Results showed the methodologic improvements in the second generation to be significant. Tracking and random thresholds were achieved by 85% and 82% of the subjects in Study 2 compared to 76% and 42% in Study 1, respectively. The correlation between the mean tracking and random thresholds was .40 in Study 2 compared to a statistically insignificant result in Study 1, indicating improved reliability. Raw thresholds were correlated with intrinsic resistance in both studies (r = .29-.88), supporting the use of Weber's Law in resistive loading studies of children. Results using the second generation methodologic improvements demonstrate that children as young as age 7 can complete resistance loading protocols. Standard methodology will enhance the comparability between studies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Ronsoni, Rafael, Bruna Predabon, Tiago Leiria, and Gustavo de Lima. "Basic principles of risk score formulation in medicine." Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira 66, no. 4 (April 2020): 516–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.66.4.516.

Full text

Abstract:

SUMMARY Risk models play a vital role in monitoring health care performance. Despite extensive research and the widespread use of risk models in medicine, there are methodologic problems. We reviewed the methodology used for risk models in medicine. The findings suggest that many risk models are developed in an ad hoc manner. Important aspects such as the selection of risk factors, handling of missing values, and size of the data sample used for model development are not dealt with adequately. Methodologic details presented in publications are often sparse and unclear. Model development and validation processes are not always linked to the clinical aim of the model, which may affect their clinical validity. We make some suggestions in this review for improving methodology and reporting.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Aabakken, L. "51Cr-Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Absorption Test: Methodologic Aspects." Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 24, no. 3 (January 1989): 351–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365528909093059.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Bosch, Ronald, and Michael Hughes. "Methodologic Approach Used by Skowron et al." JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 30, no. 1 (May 2002): 130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00042560-200205010-00018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

McKeown-Eyssen, Gail. "Methodologic Issues for the Study of Obesity." Epidemiology 17, no. 2 (March 2006): 134–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000199256.61707.b3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Devlin, John W., Yoanna Skrobik, Bram Rochwerg, Mark E. Nunnally, Dale M. Needham, Celine Gelinas, Pratik P. Pandharipande, et al. "Methodologic Innovation in Creating Clinical Practice Guidelines." Critical Care Medicine 46, no. 9 (September 2018): 1457–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000003298.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Suissa, Samy. "Methodologic Shortcomings of the INSPIRE Randomized Trial." American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 178, no. 10 (November 15, 2008): 1090–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.178.10.1090b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Wedzicha, Jadwiga A., Peter M. A. Calverley, Terence A. Seemungal, Gerry Hagan, Zainab Ansari, and Robert A. Stockley. "Methodologic Shortcomings of the INSPIRE Randomized Trial." American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 178, no. 10 (November 15, 2008): 1091–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.178.10.1091.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Greenland, S. "Statistics for Addressing Methodologic Issues in Epidemiology." American Journal of Epidemiology 163, suppl_11 (June 1, 2006): S166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/163.suppl_11.s166-a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Diehr, P., and E. O'Meara. "Methodologic Issues in Evaluating and Predicting Weight." American Journal of Epidemiology 163, suppl_11 (June 1, 2006): S87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/163.suppl_11.s87-a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Potischman, Nancy. "Biologic and Methodologic Issues for Nutritional Biomarkers." Journal of Nutrition 133, no. 3 (March 1, 2003): 875S—880S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.3.875s.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Methodologic'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles