Books on the topic 'Merits review'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Merits review.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Trial by jury: A brief review of its origin, development, and merits, and practical discussions on actual conduct of jury trials together with a consideration of constitutional provisions and other cognate subjects of importance. Buffalo, N.Y: William S. Hein & Co., 1995.
Find full textKaplan Test Prep and Admissions. PSAT/NMSQT: Strategies, practice & review. 2nd ed. New York: Kaplan Pub., 2014.
Find full textPrinceton Review: Cracking the PSAT/NMSQT with 2 practice tests. 2nd ed. New York: Princeton Review, 2018.
Find full textPublishing, Kaplan, ed. PSAT/NMSQT 2017: Strategies, practice & review with 2 practice tests. 2nd ed. New York: Kaplan Publishing, 2016.
Find full textUnited States. Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies. Getting involved: Improving federal management with employee participation : a report of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies. Washington, D.C: U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 1986.
Find full textThe 1984 report on the Senior Executive Service: A report of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1985.
Find full textUnited, States Congress Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management the Federal Workforce and the District of Columbia. Improving performance: A review of pay-for-performance systems in the federal government : hearing before the Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Subcommittee of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, second session, July 22, 2008. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2009.
Find full textImproving performance: A review of pay-for-performance systems in the federal government : hearing before the Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Subcommittee of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, second session, July 22, 2008. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2009.
Find full textOffice, General Accounting. Federal research: DOE is providing independent review of the scientific merit of its research : report to the Committee on Science, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington 20013): The Office, 2000.
Find full textOffice, General Accounting. Federal research: DOE is providing independent review of the scientific merit of its research : report to the Committee on Science, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington 20013): The Office, 2000.
Find full textOffice, General Accounting. Federal research: DOE is providing independent review of the scientific merit of its research : report to the Committee on Science, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington 20013): The Office, 2000.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia. A review of the Office of Special Counsel and Merit Systems Protection Board: Hearing before the Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Subcommittee of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, second session, March 20, 2012. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2012.
Find full textSafeguarding the merit systems principles: A review of the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Office of Special Counsel : hearing before the Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Subcommittee of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, March 22, 2007. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2007.
Find full textThe merit review process: Ensuring limited federal resources are invested in the best science : hearing before the Subcommittee on Research and Science Education, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first session, Tuesday, July 26, 2011. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2011.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia. Safeguarding the merit system: A review of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel : hearing before the Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Subcommittee of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, May 24, 2005. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2005.
Find full textShalev, Carmel. Birth power: The case for surrogacy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
Find full textThe canning season. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 2003.
Find full textBergeron, Alain M. La cle des songes. Quebec: Editions Fou lire, 2006.
Find full textReview of Commonwealth Merits Review Tribunals: Discussion paper. Canberra: A.G.P.S., 1994.
Find full textRobein, Etienne. Seismic Imaging: A Review of the Techniques, their Principles, Merits and Limitations. EAGE Publications, 2010.
Find full textRobein, Etienne. Seismic Imaging: A Review of the Techniques, their Principles, Merits and Limitations (EET 4). EAGE Publications bv, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/9789073781788.
Full textBernard, Rix. Part X Judicial Review, Judicial Performance, and Enforcement, 29 Judicial Review of the Merits of Arbitration Awards under English Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0030.
Full textRobein, Etienne. ebook - Seismic Imaging: A Review of the Techniques, their Principles, Merits and Limitations (EET 4). EAGE Publications bv, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/9789073834972.
Full textParpworth, Neil. 13. The nature of judicial review. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198810704.003.0013.
Full textBartlett, Raelene. Legal Decision-Making under the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator ACT 2011 : : An Investigation into Access to Merits Review. Independently Published, 2019.
Find full textBlackbourn, Jessie, Fiona de Londras, and Lydia Morgan. Accountability and Review in the Counter-Terrorist State. Policy Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206234.001.0001.
Full textIan A, Laird, Sabahi Borzu, Sourgens Frédéric Gilles, Birch Nicholas J, and Duggal Kabir. International investment law and arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law-iic/9780199386321.016.0002.
Full textMemoir of John Aubrey: Embracing His Auto-Biographical Sketches, a Brief Review of His Personal and Literary Merits, and an Account of His Works. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations, 2014.
Find full textBritton, John. Memoir of John Aubrey: Embracing His Auto-Biographical Sketches, a Brief Review of His Personal and Literary Merits, and an Account of His Works. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations, 2014.
Find full textMerits Of Statutory Instruments Committee Special Report Session 2003-04: Review Of The Work Of The Committee 25th Report Of Session 2003-04 (House of Lords Paper). Stationery Office, 2004.
Find full textKenrick, W. A Scrutiny; or the Criticks Criticis'd : Being an Examination Into the Censorial Merits of the Authors of the Critical Review: Occasion'd by Their ... Entitled Epistles Philosophical and Moral. Gale ECCO, Print Editions, 2018.
Find full textOwens, Ryan J., and James Sieja. Agenda-Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court. Edited by Lee Epstein and Stefanie A. Lindquist. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579891.013.13.
Full textLydia, Davies-Bright, and White Nigel D. 3 Institutional Structure and the Position of Members, 3.1 Case Concerning Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie ( Libya Arab Jamahiriya v United States of America ), Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, Order of 14 April 1992 , [1992] ICJ Rep 114. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743620.003.0015.
Full textThe Princeton Review Cracking the PSAT Princeton Review Cracking the PSATNMSQT. Princeton Review, 2012.
Find full textKaplan Test Prep and Admissions. PSAT/NMSQT: Strategies, practice & review. 2nd ed. 2013.
Find full textHargrave, Kiran Millwood. Mercies. Little Brown & Company, 2020.
Find full textHargrave, Kiran Millwood. Mercies. Pan Macmillan, 2020.
Find full textHargrave, Kiran Millwood. Mercies. Pan Macmillan, 2021.
Find full textA Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.17226/13440.
Full textJack, Gavin. Advancing Postcolonial Approaches in Critical Diversity Studies. Edited by Regine Bendl, Inge Bleijenbergh, Elina Henttonen, and Albert J. Mills. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199679805.013.3.
Full textWebb, Paul D., Thomas Poguntke, and Susan E. Scarrow. Conclusion. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198758631.003.0013.
Full textHargrave, Kiran Millwood. The Mercies. Picador, 2021.
Find full textReview of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes: Letter Report. National Academies Press, 2012.
Find full textLiverman, Catharyn T., James A. Pawelczyk, Andrea M. Schultz, Larisa M. Strawbridge, and Committee on the Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes. Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes: Letter Report. National Academies Press, 2012.
Find full textFerreira, Iago Oliveira, and Marcus Aurélio de Freitas Barros. Um novo paradigma para o controle das políticas públicas prestacionais: Tutela estrutural em foco. Brazil Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31012/978-65-5861-172-1.
Full textSociety, London Wiltshire Topographical, and John Britton. Memoir of John Aubrey, F. R. S. , Embracing His Auto-Biographical Sketches, a Brief Review of His Personal and Literary Merits, and an Account of His Works: With Extracts from His Correspondence, Anecdotes of Some of His Contemporaries, and of the Times in W. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2018.
Find full textMedicine, Institute of, Catharyn T. Liverman, James A. Pawelczyk, Andrea M. Schultz, and Larisa M. Strawbridge. Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes: Letter Report. National Academies Press, 2012.
Find full textOn Merit: A Review of Progress on Local Authority Recruitment Training (Update). The Audit Commission, 1999.
Find full textMedicine, Institute of, Catharyn T. Liverman, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Andrea M. Schultz, and Committee on the Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes. Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes: Letter Report. National Academies Press, 2012.
Find full textCommittee On Science Space an (house), United States House of Representatives, and United States United States Congress. Merit Review Process: Ensuring Limited Federal Resources Are Invested in the Best Science. Independently Published, 2019.
Find full text