Academic literature on the topic 'Marx, Karl (1818-1883) – Impérialisme'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Marx, Karl (1818-1883) – Impérialisme.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Marx, Karl (1818-1883) – Impérialisme":
Dortier, Jean-François. "Karl Marx (1818-1883)." Sciences Humaines Les Essentiels, HS3 (April 1, 2018): 16–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/sh.hs3.0016.
Dortier, Jean-François. "Karl Marx (1818-1883). Le philosophe malgré lui." Sciences Humaines N° Hors-série, HS20 (June 1, 2015): 14–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/sh.hs20.0014.
Oliveira, Agamenon R. E. "Contribuição ao Estudo do Pensamento Tecnológico de Karl Marx." Revista Scientiarum Historia 1 (October 28, 2023): e425. http://dx.doi.org/10.51919/revista_sh.v1i1.425.
Pereira, Maria de Fátima Rodrigues, Elza Margarida de Mendonça Peixoto, and Pedro Leão da Costa Netto. "MARX VIVE!!! VIVA MARX!!!" Germinal: Marxismo e Educação em Debate 10, no. 1 (May 29, 2018): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.9771/gmed.v10i1.26661.
Diógenes, Elione Maria Nogueira. "Marx: o ser e o fazer história." Educação Online, no. 16 (August 31, 2014): 90–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.36556/eol.v0i16.42.
Diógenes, Elione Maria Nogueira, and Maria Cledilma Ferreira da Silva Costa. "Marx: o ser e o fazer história." Latin American Journal of Development 3, no. 4 (July 16, 2021): 2074–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.46814/lajdv3n4-029.
Arthur, C. J. "Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels." Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 20 (March 1986): 147–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0957042x00004089.
Roitberg, Guilherme Prado. "DA SEMIFORMAÇÃO À OMNILATERALIDADE: REFLEXÕES SOBRE UTOPIAS FORMATIVAS E EMANCIPAÇÃO." Educação: Teoria e Prática 29, no. 61 (August 27, 2019): 305–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.18675/1981-8106.vol29.n61.p305-320.
Sholahuddin, M. "KRITIK TERHADAP SISTEM EKONOMISOSIALIS DAN KAPITALIS." Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan 2, no. 2 (January 1, 2007): 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.23917/jep.v2i2.3915.
Bittencourt, Rodrigo do Prado. "As visões de Hegel e Marx acerca da História." Politeia - História e Sociedade 21, no. 2 (July 19, 2023): 183–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.22481/politeia.v21i2.10409.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Marx, Karl (1818-1883) – Impérialisme":
Albin, Jean-François. "Crise et impérialisme : histoire et actualité des approches marxistes." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 10, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024PA100020.
Starting from Marx's analyzes relatives to the contradictions of the process of extraction, realization and accumulation of value, of the tendencies inherent in the crisis as the cyclical materialization of the unequal development of the capitalist mode of production, in the triple form of under-consumption, disproportion and the downward trend in the rate of profit, we will seek to critically trace the emergence and affirmation of the first Marxist theories of imperialism during the period of the Second International. This presentation will lead us to examine the whole historical and theoretical mediations which link the conceptualization of imperialism to the notions of capitalist accumulation, crisis, relations between states, monopoly, financial capital and war. We will seek to consider to what extent these theories go beyond the particular historical conjuncture to which they are attached and would be able to support a materialist theory of international relations
Casanova, Pinochet Carlos. "Estética y producción en Karl Marx." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2012. http://www.repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/115231.
Tesis no autorizada por su autor para ser publicada a texto completo
La presente tesis explora la relación entre la “estética” y el concepto de “actividad productiva” en Karl Marx, atendiendo a los aspectos más relevantes de su obra temprana y madura. Este trabajo de investigación se propone, en primer lugar, exponer el contexto en el que emergen las categorías marxianas de “actividad sensible” (sinnliche Tätigkeit), de “relación práctica” (praktische Verhältnis) y de “fuerzas humanas esenciales” (menschlichen Wesenskräfte), para a partir de aquí presentar el modo en que ellas se traman a un pensamiento de lo “común” o del “comunismo”, inseparable de la idea de una “emancipación plena de todos los sentidos humanos (vollständige Emanzipation aller menschlichen Sinne)”. Respecto a esto último, nuestra investigación, en segundo lugar, se plantea el problema de los posibles vínculos entre la primera fase de la obra de Marx y la estética del idealismo alemán, particularmente el lazo entre la concepción marxiana de una revolución estética más profunda que la revolución política y la idea en Schiller de una “revolución de la sensibilidad”. Se trata, finalmente, de indagar sobre las relaciones de continuidad y de discontinuidad que hay entre aquel conjunto de categorías en la obra marxiana temprana y la emergencia de los conceptos de “fuerza de producción” y de “división del trabajo”, con el objetivo de esclarecer la problemática de la obra de arte en el marco general de una crítica de la economía política.
Hunt, Ian Edgell. "Dialectic in Marx /." Title page and synopsis only, 1989. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09PH/09phh941.pdf.
Bertocchi, Jean-Louis. "Marx : une certaine approche du travail." Aix-Marseille 1, 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994AIX10071.
Marxism, with its errors and its faults, belongs to contemporary theoretical culture. A close reading of marx's work reveals that one of the principle contributions of marxist thought, consists in the foundations established in the approach to the reality of human work labour. The validity of this analysis is still certain today, not only in so far as it confronts the contemporary stakes which make the question of work one of the central queries of our contemporality, but also in that this analysis has been able to situate this query. Basing itself, certainly, on political economy and its criticism but also on a fundamental reflection genuinely engrained in the most demanding philosophical tradition. The complexity of marxist thought, and the richness of its approach allow the grasp of a dialectic between value of usage and value of exchange, concrete and abstract work labour, poiesis and praxis, concept and experience, which can lead us to the work labour paradigm of our contemporality
Timsit, Alexandre. "Les économistes et la réception de l'oeuvre de Marx." Nice, 2003. http://www.theses.fr/2003NICE0008.
Besides the introductory chapter, which concerns the introduction of the theories of Marx, the thesis comprises three parts. First, we study the readings and critiques of the theories of Marx, based on book I of Capital, by the French liberal economists and the marginalists. We show that those readings are ideological and reductionist. The second part covers the period from the death of Marx to the publication of book III of Capital. We present the controversy between Loria and Engels, and then the contributions of Sombart, Labriola, Croce, Sorel and Andler. We show that the reading of these authors is more accurate than those of the liberals and the marginalists, because it takes the specificity of Marx's scientific approach into account. The third part deals with the readings based on the whole Capital. We present the reaction of marxists to the content of book III; then we come back to liberals and marginalists, to show that their position does not evolve much. In the final analysis, it appears that those economists erroneously interpreted Marx's writings, despite the indications given on this matter by other scholars
Olivares, Canto Yercko. "Tres lecturas del concepto de trabajo en el primer tomo del Capital de Marx." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2018. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/169894.
Ranieri, Jesus José 1965. "Alienação e estranhamento nos manuscritos de 1844 de Karl Marx." [s.n.], 1995. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/281436.
Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-19T22:31:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ranieri_JesusJose_M.pdf: 4569628 bytes, checksum: 6b285bd048fed62fafdfd79c2651bc83 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995
Resumo: Não informado
Abstract: Not informed
Mestrado
Mestre em Sociologia
Khiari, Sadri. "Marx et l'Etat : la notion de bonapartisme." Paris 8, 2003. http://www.theses.fr/2003PA08A001.
According to the Marxist terminology, the notion of Bonapartism refers at first to the experience of the Second Empire whose advent was analyzed by Marx in his three main political written works. In this analysis Bonapartism emerges as a form which is specific to the bourgeois State, characterized by a personal and plebiscitary dictatorship. Bonapartism rests on a strong bureaucratic, police and military machinery and develops a Populist and national ideology. In Bonapartism, bureaucracy governs on behalf of the bourgeoisie but for the benefit of the latter. This of course is a minimal definition that our thesis seeks to question. From which theoretical schema have they developed this Bonapartist hypothesis? What were the main moments of this working out and what were the handicaps this hypothesis encountered?
Philippe, Bernard. "D'un énoncé de la loi de la valeur à une formalisation des équilibres temporaires : prolégomènes et enseignements d'une lecture du Capital." Amiens, 1988. http://www.theses.fr/1988AMIE0005.
To assimilate value and energy expenditure and to postulate the determining of prices by values is to render the description of the effects of post validation impossible. Can the arguments brought forward in The Capital be freed from these two stand points? This is what we have attempted to demonstrate. We have deduced a conception of The Capital that is susceptible of enlarging the scope of the different formalizations used currently within the framework of the disequilibrium theory
Garo, Isabelle. "Reflet et représentation dans la pensée de Marx." Paris 1, 1996. http://www.theses.fr/1996PA010582.
The theory of reflex has been for long debated granting marx with the argument that knowledge might be a relevant image of the objective reality. The analysis of this proposition, that started with engels and lenin is still going on till now, allows and requires a coming back to the proper use made by marx of reflex and image notions within the scope of a more general reflexion upon representation. This reflexion leads him from a controversy against the hegelian and neo-hegelian conceits to the elaboration of the ideology concept, pointing out social creation and function of representations within the range of class war in the way of capitalist production. Emphasizing the proper dynamism of these representations, marx has overcome the inherent tensions in his type of ideology, studying this objective representation : money, upon the original ground of criticism of political economy. Hence he gives an analogical role to the reflex notion allowing it to take into account singular and concrete representations, such as. So, this notion of a new kind bears the opportunity of a proceeding criticism of philosophy wich never builds up into a new theory of knowledge. The study of the marxism conceit of representation does give way to a proper style of investigation and conceptualism, that does not gather its conclusions in an ultimate synthesis but deal - in a way both open and precisily defined - with the most varied representations and in particular with the notions of theory and method within their relationship to a transforming application. Then, in a unique move, the problem of representation arises as worked out, implemented and reflected
Books on the topic "Marx, Karl (1818-1883) – Impérialisme":
Anthony, Brewer. Marxist theories of imperialism: A critical survey. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1990.
Anthony, Brewer. Marxist theories of imperialism: A critical survey. London: Routledge, 1989.
Mark, Blaug, ed. Karl Marx (1818-1883). Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Pub., 1991.
Eagleton, Terry. Marx. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Appelbaum, Richard P. Karl Marx. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, 1988.
Elster, Jon. An introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Ernst, Fischer. How to read Karl Marx. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1996.
Korsch, Karl. Karl Marx. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
Carver, Terrell. The postmodern Marx. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998.
Carver, Terrell. The postmodern Marx. University Park, Penn: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.
Book chapters on the topic "Marx, Karl (1818-1883) – Impérialisme":
Lüthy, Herbert. "Karl Marx (1818–1883)." In Die Fairness-Formel, 93–100. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07956-7_10.
Vormbaum, Thomas. "Karl Marx (1818–1883)." In Moderne deutsche Strafrechtsdenker, 155–64. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17200-7_12.
Howard, Alex. "Karl Marx (1818–1883)." In Philosophy for Counselling and Psychotherapy, 262–73. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04644-4_26.
Vester, Heinz-Günter. "Karl Marx (1818–1883)." In Kompendium der Soziologie II: Die Klassiker, 33–49. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91590-6_3.
Jackson, Michael. "Marx, Karl (1818–1883)." In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 2095–97. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1051.
Alatas, Syed Farid. "Karl Marx (1818–1883)." In Sociological Theory Beyond the Canon, 47–78. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41134-1_3.
Michaelides, Panayotis G., and Theodoulos Eleftherios Papadakis. "Karl Marx (1818–1883)." In History of Economic Ideas, 29–43. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19697-3_3.
Chandra, Ramesh. "Karl Marx (1818–1883)." In Reflections on the Future of Capitalism, 29–67. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57595-2_2.
Mandel, Ernest. "Marx, Karl Heinrich (1818–1883)." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 1–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1019-1.
Mandel, Ernest. "Marx, Karl Heinrich (1818–1883)." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 1–30. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1019-2.