Relevant bibliographies by topics / Manure management

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Manure management'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Manure management.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Manure management"

1

Murphy, James P. "Swine Manure Management." Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports, no. 10 (January 1, 1996): 177–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.6480.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Smith, John M. "MANURE SPILL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT." Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 2000, no. 16 (January 1, 2000): 420–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864700784994777.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

van der Meer, H. G. "Optimising manure management for GHG outcomes." Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, no. 2 (2008): 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ea07214.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper focuses on improvements to livestock manure management to reduce environmental pollution and emission of greenhouse gases (GHG). Livestock manures contain large amounts of plant nutrients and organic matter (OM). Structural changes to livestock production and ample supply of cheap chemical fertilisers have decreased the interest and possibilities of farmers in using manure for the fertilisation of crops and grasslands and maintenance of soil fertility. As a result, many livestock producers dispose of manure as cheaply as possible causing serious pollution of soil, water and atmosphere. In addition, livestock production systems contribute to climate change by emission of the GHG carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Careful recycling of livestock manures to fertilise crops and grasslands and improve soil fertility is considered the most suitable and cost-effective option for environmentally friendly disposal. Manure management legislation in The Netherlands is described to explain the principles. These include complete collection of faeces and urine of confined livestock, adaptation of the period and rate of manure application to the N and P requirements of crops, and use of manure collection, storage and application techniques aiming at low ammonia (NH3) losses. Effects of sustainable manure management on GHG emissions are described. Optimising the period, rate and technique of manure application to crops and grassland causes effective utilisation of manure N and reduces direct and indirect losses of N2O. In addition, effective recycling of manure nutrients and OM allows a reduction in the use of chemical fertilisers and fossil energy and contributes to the maintenance or improvement of the carbon content of agricultural ecosystems. The relatively high costs of sustainable manure management stimulate farmers to optimise feed conversion and minimise manure production per unit of product by good livestock feeding and management practices. High feed conversion efficiency reduces CH4 emission by enteric fermentation and may reduce feed imports and related GHG emissions. In addition, it is shown that livestock categories differ widely in feed conversion efficiency and N and P excretion per unit of product. Finally, anaerobic digestion of livestock slurries provides a valuable energy source and reduces CH4 emission of stored slurry and, possibly, N2O emission after field application of the slurry.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Miller, Jim J., and Bruce W. Beasley. "Influence of Livestock Manure Type on Transport of Escherichia coli in Surface Runoff." Water Quality Research Journal 43, no. 2-3 (May 1, 2008): 129–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2008.016.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Since livestock manure type may influence transport of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in runoff, the choice of which type of livestock manure to apply to cropland may be a potential beneficial management practice (BMP) to reduce and manage E. coli in runoff. Four common manure types (beef, dairy, chicken, hog) were applied to a clay loam soil in small runoff boxes, and a rainfall simulator was used to generate artificial runoff. Runoff samples were collected at three successive time intervals (0 to 5, 5 to 15, 15 to 30 min) and analyzed for flow-weighted mean concentrations (FWMC) of E. coli as well as mass loss of E. coli expressed as a percentage of total E. coli applied. Manure treatment had a significant (p ≤ 0.10) influence on FWMC of E. coli in runoff. The FWMC of E. coli in runoff for the dairy (33.3 CFU per 100 mL) treatment was similar to the control (3.2 CFU per 100 mL), but E. coli concentrations for the beef (955 CFU per 100 mL), chicken (1,134 CFU per 100 mL), and hog (368 CFU per 100 mL) treatments were all significantly greater than the control. The FWMC values were not significantly different among the four manured treatments except for dairy versus chicken manure, where values were significantly lower for dairy manure. Concentrations of E. coli were less than the guideline for recreation waters (< 200 CFU per 100 mL) for the control and dairy treatment, but exceeded this guideline for beef, chicken, and hog manures, suggesting that dairy manure may be better than the other three manures for protecting surface water bodies for recreational use. Our study suggests that manure type may be a possible BMP to manage and control FWMC of E. coli in surface waters.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Nielsen, V. C. "Manure management and environmental effects." BSAP Occasional Publication 11 (January 1987): 109–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0263967x00001841.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe management of pig manures and slurries has not responded to the changes that have occurred in the development of pig farms. Management systems have remained unchanged despite the fact that the majority of pigs (64%) are kept on 10–3% of all pig units. The pressures of heavy applications of manures on restricted areas of land and the large numbers of animals kept in buildings has given rise to environmental pollution by odours and by contamination of water and of the soil.The cause of odour formation in buildings is discussed, together with the effects of dust on odour dispersion. Methods of reducing odours and the effect of straw on odour formation and slurry handling are discussed.Methods of controlling odours from buildings, stores and from manure applied to the land are reviewed and areas which need further research and development are proposed.Environmental pollution by manures and slurries of water and soils and measures to control pollution are reviewed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Veljković, B., R. Koprivica, D. Radivojević, and Z. Mileusnić. "Manure management on dairy farms." Savremena poljoprivredna tehnika 42, no. 4 (2016): 85–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/savpoljteh1602085v.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

BARTH, C. L. "Fly Control Through Manure Management." Poultry Science 65, no. 4 (April 1986): 668–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0650668.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Leytem, April, and James Mutegi. "Manure Phosphorus Management from a Global Perspective." Better Crops with Plant Food 103, no. 1 (March 11, 2019): 26–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.24047/bc103126.

Full text
Abstract:
While livestock manure is a significant global reserve of P, it is not always used efficiently in agricultural production. Due to the segregation of livestock and cropping systems in many countries, poor redistribution of manure P has led to regions with both surpluses and deficits. As phosphate rock must be considered a finite source, the recycling of P from manures regionally, nationally, and even globally needs to be improved for food security in the future.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sheppard, S. C., and B. Sanipelli. "Trace Elements in Feed, Manure, and Manured Soils." Journal of Environmental Quality 41, no. 6 (November 2012): 1846–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0133.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sheppard, S. C., and B. Sanipelli. "Trace Elements in Feed, Manure, and Manured Soils." Journal of Environmental Quality 42, no. 4 (July 2013): 1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0133er.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Manure management"

1

Hassinger, Elaine, and Jack Watson. "Manure Use and Management." College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/146418.

Full text
Abstract:
2 pp.
This fact sheet is taken from the Arizona Farm *A*Syst workbook. Farm *A*Syst is a voluntary groundwater pollution prevention program designed for farmers and rural residents. This fact sheet covers information that will help you successfully apply manure and other organic wastes to crop land while keeping the groundwater safe.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Le, Hanh Thi Van. "Impact of Manure Management Practices on the Environmental Fate of Antibiotics in Manure-Applied Fields." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/102603.

Full text
Abstract:
Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from animal manure applied to soil as fertilizer are now among the most concerned contaminants in soil. The widespread use of antibiotics in livestock might amplify the risk of developing antibiotic resistance, causing once treatable diseases to turn deadly. The World Health Organization declared antibiotic resistance as "one of the biggest threats to global health, food security, and development". The goal of this dissertation was to develop best manure management practices by understanding the behavior of manure-associated antibiotics in manure, water, and soil. In particular, my research focused on the effects of manure application methods, on-site manure treatment methods, manure application seasons, and manure-rainfall time gaps on antibiotic surface runoff losses, antibiotic distribution and movement in soil, antibiotic dissipation in soil, and development of antibiotic resistance. Rainfall simulation field-scale and soil incubation lab studies were combined to find the best manure management practices. My research has shown for the first time that using the manure soil subsurface injection method, especially during spring application season due to moist soil, applying manure at least 3 days before a subsequent rainfall, and using composted manure, can significantly reduce the quantity of antibiotic loss with runoff from manure-applied fields to the surrounding environment. The majority of applied antibiotics remained in soil. All antibiotics showed a similar dissipation pattern with fastest kinetics during the first 14 d before slowing down. The effect of two manure application methods on antibiotic dissipation kinetics varied with different antibiotics. Although the half-life of tested antibiotics in soil was short (<21 days), some remained detectable even at 6 months after a single manure application. Results also showed that compared to the surface application, the subsurface injection slits acted as a "hot zone" with a higher amount of antibiotics, manure microbes, and antibiotic resistance. The results provide information for policy makers, manure managers, and farmers to develop better manure management practices that can use manure as fertilizer while minimizing the spread of antibiotics to surrounding water, soil, and plants.
Doctor of Philosophy
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hiliare, Sheldon. "Impact of Manure Land Management Practices on Manure Borne Antibiotic Resistant Elements (AREs) in Agroecosystems." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/102218.

Full text
Abstract:
Rising global antibiotic resistance has caused concerns over sources and pathways for the spread of contributing factors. Majority of the antimicrobials used in the U.S. are involved in veterinary medicine, primarily with livestock rearing. Animal manure land application integrates livestock farming and agroecosystems. This manure contains antibiotic resistant elements (AREs) (resistant bacteria, resistance genes, and veterinary antibiotics) that contribute towards antimicrobial resistance. Altering manure application techniques can reduce surface runoff of other contaminants such as excess N and P, pesticides, and hormones, that can impact water quality. Conventional tillage practices in the U.S. has reduced or stopped, making subsurface injection of manure a promising option when compared to surface application. Our research compared manure application methods, manure application seasons, cropping system, and manure-rainfall time gaps to gauge the impact on AREs in the environment. Two field-scale rainfall simulation studies were conducted along with one laboratory study. Using the injection method lowered concentrations of manure associated AREs entering surface runoff. When manure was surface applied and rainfall occurred 7 d after application, 9-30 times less resistant fecal coliform bacteria (FCB) entered surface runoff when compared to 1 d time gap for that broadcast method. Within a day of manure application, antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) profiles in soil began to differ from each other based on manure application and soil ARG richness in all manure-amended soil increased compared to the background. Runoff from injection plots contained 52 ARGs with higher abundance compared to runoff from surface applied plots. ARGs in the former were more correlated to soil and more correlated to manure in the latter. The highest antibiotic concentrations were in the injection slit soil of those plots. Antibiotic concentrations in samples corresponded positively to concentrations of resistant FCB and ARGs, and there was a positive correlation between resistant FCB and their associated ARGs (Spearman's ρ = 0.43-0.63). A CRIISPR-Cas12a assay for quantification of ARGs in environmental samples was just as precise as conventional methods. There is also potential for in-situ detection. These combined results can hopefully help farmers improve manure management practices that mitigate spread of AREs to surrounding water, crops, and soil.
Doctor of Philosophy
Rising global antibiotic resistance cause concerns over sources and pathways for the spread of contributing factors. Most of the antimicrobials used in the U.S. are involved in veterinary medicine, especially with livestock rearing. Overuse of antibiotics that are medically important to human medicine compromises the effectiveness of our medicines. Animal manure contains antibiotic resistant elements (AREs) such as resistant bacteria, resistance genes, and antibiotics) that contribute towards resistance issues. Once these AREs enter the environment, they can be taken up by crops, runoff into surface water or leached into ground water, or even reside within the animal products we consume. Altering manure application techniques is beneficial for nutrient conservation but also potentially for reducing ARE spread. With our research, we compared manure application methods, manure application seasons, cropping systems, and manure-rainfall time gaps to find ways to balance the need for manure application and the spread of resistance. We used two field-scale rainfall simulation studies along with one laboratory study. Overall, using the injection method resulted in significantly lower concentrations of manure associated AREs entering surface runoff. When manure was surface applied and rainfall occurred 7 d after application, less resistant fecal coliform bacteria (FCB) entered surface runoff when compared to the 1 d time gap for broadcast methods. Within a day of manure application, antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) profiles in soil began to differ from each other and soil ARG totals in all manure applied soil increased compared to the background. Runoff from injection plots contained more soil ARGs and runoff from surface applied plots containing more manure associated ARGs. The subsurface injection method also caused highest antibiotic concentrations in the injection slit soil of those plots. High antibiotic concentrations in samples generally meant high concentrations of resistant FCB and ARGs, and resistant FCB were also found with their associated ARGs as well. A CRISPR-Cas12a assay for quantification of ARGs in environmental samples was just as precise as conventional methods. There is also potential for onsite detection. These combined results can hopefully help farmers improve manure management practices that mitigate spread of AREs to surrounding water, crops, and soil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kern, James D. "Water Quality Impacts of Cover Crop/Manure Management Systems." Diss., Virginia Tech, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40385.

Full text
Abstract:
Crop production, soil system, water quality, and economic impacts of four corn silage production systems were compared through a field study including 16 plots (4 replications of each treatment). Systems included a rye cover crop and application of liquid dairy manure in the spring and fall. The four management systems were: 1) traditional, 2) double-crop, 3) roll-down, and 4) undercut. In the fourth system, manure was applied below the soil surface during the undercutting process. In all other systems, manure was surface-applied. In the third system, the rye crop was flattened with a heavy roller after manure application. Simulated rainfall was applied within 48 h of manure application. Measured constituent concentrations in runoff were compared with water quality criteria. Costs and returns of all systems were compared. The undercut system reduced loadings of all nutrients, but increased total suspended solids (TSS) concentration as compared with all other systems. The mean volume of runoff from the undercut system was less than half that from any other system, which influenced all constituent loadings. Mean TSS concentration in runoff from the undercut system was over three times the mean of any other system. The roll-down system had no significant effect on water quality as compared to the traditional system. The undercut system was reasonably effective in keeping phosphate phosphorus levels below the criterion set for bathing water. None of the systems generally exceeded nitrate nitrogen concentration criteria. However, total phosphorus, orthophosphate, fecal coliform and e. coli criteria for drinking, bathing, shellfish harvest, and aesthetics were regularly exceeded by all of the systems. There were no differences among the treatments in effects on bacterial concentrations. The double-crop system produced significantly higher net returns than all other systems only if the value of the rye crop was $92.31/Mg or more. There were no significant differences in net returns of the traditional, roll-down, or undercut systems.
Ph. D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Newell, Cory W. "Nutrient flow and manure management in the mink industry." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/MQ49417.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Akochi-Koblé, Emmanuel. "Evaluation of sphagnum moss and chemical compounds for management of odor and use of liquid hog manure." Thesis, McGill University, 1991. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=59944.

Full text
Abstract:
Liquid hog manure (LHM) obtained from the Macdonald College farm was used in experiments aimed at (a) reducing the odor associated with LHM during handling and (b) conserving the fertilizer capacity of LHM. Various chemical treatments and sphagnum moss (SM) were evaluated to achieve the above objectives. Direct acidification to $<$ pH 5.0, sphagnum moss (SM) and its combination with aluminum sulfate (AS) resulted in significant (p $<$ 0.05) reduction in ammonia losses during storage of LHM. The SM and SM/AS combination also significantly (p $<$ 0.05) reduced both odor presence and offensiveness. Gas chromatographic (GC) and GC/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis indicated the absence of certain malodor compounds and lower peak areas of certain compounds in the SM and SM/AS treatments when compared to the controls. Investigations with barley seeding revealed that treatments which reduced the malodor of the LHM did not significantly (p $<$ 0.05) affect the nitrogen fertilization capacity of the LHM, as indicated by plant dry matter yield.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Vaddella, Venkata Kumar. "Ammonia emissions management and modeling from storages of dairy manure." Pullman, Wash. : Washington State University, 2010. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Dissertations/Spring2010/V_Vaddella_1030810.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Svinurai, Walter. "Manure production and nutrient management in pasture-based dairy production systems." Thesis, University of Fort Hare, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10353/475.

Full text
Abstract:
Manure production and nutrient management in pasture-based dairy production systems by Walter Svinurai The effect of dietary treatments on nutrient excretion was determined and an attempt to improving the retention of excreted nitrogen in stored manure using Aloe ferox leaf gel (AFLG) and pine bark was conducted at a pasture-based dairy farm. The animal mass-balance method was used to determine nutrient excretion by cows fed on three dietary treatments, Lolium perrene-based treatment (LP), Lolium multiforium-based treatment (LM) and Lolium perenne- Trifolium repens -based treatment (LTF). In separate experiments, slurry from dairy cows fed LM was amended with AFLG and pine bark at concentrations of 25, 50, 75 and 100 g/l and stored under anaerobic conditions for 16 days. The highest and lowest excretions of N, P and K were observed in LM and LP treatments, respectively. Increasing dietary N improved K and N retention in milk and, consequently increased milk urea nitrogen (MUN) and N excretion (P < 0.05). The concentrations of AFLG affected N and P retention in manure (P < 0.05). The highest retention in total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) of the initial was 42% AFLG at 25g/l inclusion rate. Ammonium nitrogen (AMN) concentration increased significantly due to the interactive effect of AFLG inclusion rate and time. Pine bark powder significantly improved N and P retention in manure at all concentrations. The retention in TKN was higher (P < 0.05) at 25g/l pine bark powder than other concentrations. The interaction effect of inclusion rate and time increased iii AMN (P < 0.05). Dietary treatments significantly affected nutrient excretion, and AFLG and pine bark considerably improved N retention in stored slurry. Findings from the filed trial suggest the need for more attention on managing dietary nutrients in the post-rainy and cool-dry season when growth of pasture influenced choice of dietary treatments that led to high nutrient excretion. Field simulation of the additives to determine their efficacy and environmental hazards was recommended.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gedikoglu, Haluk McCann Laura. "Adoption of nutrient management practices." Diss., Columbia, Mo. : University of Missouri--Columbia, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10355/6614.

Full text
Abstract:
Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on March 17, 2010). The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file. Thesis advisor: Dr. Laura McCann. Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ryding, Caroline. "Assessment of nutrient emission factors for different manure and digestate management systems." Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Biologi, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-149595.

Full text
Abstract:
An efficient management of organic fertilizers (here animal manure and digestate) is of large concern in today´s agriculture. When evaluating the efficiency of alternative management systems, differences in nutrient losses (emissions) must be taken into consideration. Those can be rather specific for e.g. a geographical region and agricultural system. This literature study aimed at identifying emission factors and uncertainty ranges, that are relevant to use in comparative system studies of different organic fertilizer management systems in South Swedish climate. Emissions from manure and digestate storage, application and field losses were considered. For carbon, the sequestration of organic carbon in the soil was considered instead of the carbon dioxide emissions from manure/digestate decomposition in soils. The values were very variable, and the median value was used as the selected emission factor. From storage of liquid cow manure, the ammonia emission for storage with cover was 3 % of the ammonium content, and 10 % without cover. It was about the same for both liquid pig manure (8 %) and solid cattle manure (10 %). The methane emissions during storage were 10 % of the maximum methane potential. Ammonia emissions during application ranged from 10-20 % of ammonium-nitrogen. Two studies of manure carbon sequestration were found that was applicable for the Swedish climate. They indicated that about 8-11 % of the carbon applied as solid manure was sequestered, compared to about 4 % for liquid manure.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Manure management"

1

Ontario. Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Sheep Manure Management. S.l: s.n, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bertrand, R. A. Manure management guidelines. Victoria, B.C: Publications Office, B.C. Ministry of Agriculture and Food, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bowman, Dwight D. Manure pathogens: Manure management, regulations, and water quality protection. Alexandria, Va: WEF Press, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bowman, Dwight D. Manure pathogens: Manure management, regulations, and water quality protection. Alexandria, Va: WEF Press, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Young, C. Edwin. Alternatives for dairy manure management. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Natural Resource Economics Division, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

S, Dellaguardia Carmen, ed. Manure: Management, uses and environmental impacts. Hauppauge, N.Y: Nova Science Publishers, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

H, Burton C., Turner C, and Silsoe Research Institute, eds. Manure management: Treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture. 2nd ed. Silsoe: Silsoe Research Institute, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Schindler, Frank V. Manure management BMPs based on soil phosphorus. [Pierre, S.D: Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

United States. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Manure management for open lot livestock production. Des Moines, Iowa: The Service, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Nzuma, Jean K. Improving the management of manure in Zimbabwe. London: IIED Drylands Programme, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Manure management"

1

Larney, Francis J., Xiying Hao, and Edward Topp. "Manure Management." In Soil Management: Building a Stable Base for Agriculture, 245–63. Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/2011.soilmanagement.c16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sommer, Sven G., Oene Oenema, Teruo Matsunaka, and Lars S. Jensen. "Regulations on Animal Manure Management." In Animal Manure Recycling, 25–40. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118676677.ch3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kleinman, Peter J. A., Anthony R. Buda, Andrew N. Sharpley, and Raj Khosla. "Elements of Precision Manure Management." In Agronomy Monographs, 165–92. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr59.c9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Sommer, Sven G., and Morten L. Christensen. "Animal Production and Animal Manure Management." In Animal Manure Recycling, 5–23. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118676677.ch2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Vinnerås, Björn. "Sanitation and Hygiene in Manure Management." In Animal Manure Recycling, 91–104. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118676677.ch6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

He, Zhongqi, Paulo Pagliari, and Heidi M. Waldrip. "Advances and Outlook of Manure Production and Management." In Animal Manure, 373–83. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub67.c28.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Bruun, Sander, Marieke T. Hoeve, and Morten Birkved. "Life Cycle Assessment of Manure Management Systems." In Animal Manure Recycling, 329–41. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118676677.ch16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Schmidt, Thomas. "Innovation in Animal Manure Management and Recycling." In Animal Manure Recycling, 343–56. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118676677.ch17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Reddy, P. Parvatha. "Cover/Green Manure Cropping." In Agro-ecological Approaches to Pest Management for Sustainable Agriculture, 91–107. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4325-3_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Westendorf, Michael L., Carey A. Williams, Stephanie Murphy, Laura Kenny, and Masoud Hashemi. "Generation and Management of Manure from Horses and Other Equids." In Animal Manure, 145–63. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub67.c8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Manure management"

1

Lorimor, Jeffery. "New Manure Plan and Manure Applicator Certification Requirements." In Proceedings of the 1995 Integrated Crop Management Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-595.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Johnson, James D. "Manure Applicators' Certification." In Proceedings of the 1995 Integrated Crop Management Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-590.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"MANURE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND TECHNOLOGIES." In Animal Agriculture and the Environment, National Center for Manure & Animal Waste Management White Papers . St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.20260.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Eghball, Bahman, Brian J. Wienhold, and John E. Gilley. "Managing Manure Phosphorus." In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Integrated Crop Management Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-630.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Frolova, Olga, Juris Priekulis, Laima Berzina, and Aivars Aboltins. "Ammonia emission evaluation from manure management." In 16th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development. Latvia University of Agriculture, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/erdev2017.16.n274.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Richard Hegg. "SUMMARY OF ANIMAL MANURE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH." In 2002 Chicago, IL July 28-31, 2002. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.10940.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Unal Kizil and James A. Lindley. "FEEDLOT RUNOFF AND MANURE MANAGEMENT MODEL." In 2001 Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1,2001. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.4203.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rieck-Hinz, Angela, and Kelvin Leibold. "Manure: The New Commodity." In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Integrated Crop Management Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-945.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"Manure-pH Management for Mitigating Ammonia Emissions from Manure-Flush Dairy Barns." In 2014 ASABE Annual International Meeting. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.20141892636.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Subrata Karmakar, Michael Nketia, Joy Agnew, Claude Lague, and Hubert Landry. "Expert System Modeling of Liquid Manure Management for Integrated Decision Support System of Swine Manure Management." In ASABE/CSBE North Central Intersectional Meeting. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.22358.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Manure management"

1

Brenneman, Greg, James Jensen, and Kevin Van Dee. Swine Manure Management Study. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1896.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Brenneman, Greg, James Jensen, and Kevin Van Dee. Swine Manure Management Study. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1906.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bentley, Jenn A., Leo L. Timms, Larry F. Tranel, and Ron A. Lenth. Manure Management Systems-Iowa Dairy Producer Surveys. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State University, January 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/ans_air-180814-204.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bentley, Jenn A., Leo L. Timms, Larry F. Tranel, Greg Gregory Brenneman, Kris Kohl, and Ron A. Lenth. Economics of Dairy Manure Management in Iowa. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State University, January 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/ans_air-180814-205.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Panetta, D. M., Wendy J. Powers, and Jeffrey C. Lorimor. Management Impacts on Ammonia Volatilization from Swine Manure. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State University, January 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/ans_air-180814-1378.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Smyth, John. Rainier Biogas Manure Management and Renewable Energy Generation Facility. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1361431.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Maguire, Rory, and Timothy Woodward. Impact of Changing From Nitrogen- to Phosphorus-Based Manure Nutrient Management Plans. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Cooperative Extension, August 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.21061/442-310.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bentley, Jenn A., Ryan Breuer, Leo L. Timms, Larry F. Tranel, Ronald A. Lenth, Brian J. Lang, Angie M. Rieck-Hinz, Greg Gregory Brenneman, Kris Kohl, and Beth E. Doran. Implementing Risk Management Decisions that Optimize Nutrient Value of Dairy Manure while Minimizing Related Risk. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State University, January 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/ans_air-180814-203.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Haq, Mazhar Ul, Antonio P. Mallarino, Carl H. Pederson, Matthew J. Helmers, Rameshwar S. Kanwar, and Kenneth T. Pecinovsky. Fertilizer and Swine Manure Management Systems Impacts on Phosphorus in Soil and Subsurface Tile Drainage. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1164.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Dougherty, Brian, Carl Pederson, Matt Helmers, Michelle Soupir, Dan Andersen, Antonio Mallarino, and John Sawyer. Drainage Water Quality Impacts of Agricultural Management Practices: Effectof Manure Application Timing and Cover Crops. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1723.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Manure management' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography