Academic literature on the topic 'Manifestation of Innovation Capability'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Manifestation of Innovation Capability.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Manifestation of Innovation Capability"
Liao, Ying, and Yulong Li. "Complementarity effect of supply chain competencies on innovation capability." Business Process Management Journal 25, no. 6 (September 17, 2019): 1251–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-04-2018-0115.
Full textTikas, Gaurav Dilip, and Akhilesh K.B. "Towards enhancing innovation capability of teams: a conceptual perspective." Team Performance Management: An International Journal 23, no. 7/8 (October 10, 2017): 352–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tpm-04-2016-0011.
Full textAstuty, Eriana. "Partnership consensus in triple helix pathways: A challenge for sustainable higher education." E3S Web of Conferences 408 (2023): 01014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340801014.
Full textBorysov, Viacheslav, Tetiana Solomko, Mykhail Yamshinskij, Ivan Lukianenko, Bohdan Tsymbal, Andrey Andreev, Viacheslav Bratishko, Tamara Bilko, Victor Rebenko, and Tetiana Chorna. "Identification of the features of structural-phase transformations in the processing of waste from the production of high-alloy steels." Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 4, no. 12(112) (August 26, 2021): 33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.238763.
Full textARIAS-PÉREZ, JOSÉ, CARLOS MARIO DURANGO YEPES, and NORA TERESA MILLÁN LÓPEZ. "Process innovation capability and innovation performance: mediating effect of product innovation capability." AD-minister, no. 27 (2015): 75–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.27.4.
Full textMoths, E. "Innovation - Manifestation des Zeitgeistes." TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 7, no. 1 (March 1, 1998): 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.14512/tatup.7.1.19.
Full textKapitan, Tetiana. "THE ESSENCE OF THE CONCEPT OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF A FUTURE TEACHER OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES." Academic Notes Series Pedagogical Science 1, no. 203 (March 2022): 77–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2022-1-203-77-81.
Full textHan, Shaojie, Yibo Lyu, Ruonan Ji, Yuqing Zhu, Jingqin Su, and Lining Bao. "Open innovation, network embeddedness and incremental innovation capability." Management Decision 58, no. 12 (October 14, 2020): 2655–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/md-08-2019-1038.
Full textKoria, Mikko. "On Innovation and Capability." Philosophy of Management 7, no. 2 (2009): 77–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/pom20097230.
Full textSwink, Morgan. "Building Collaborative Innovation Capability." Research-Technology Management 49, no. 2 (March 2006): 37–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2006.11657367.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Manifestation of Innovation Capability"
Essmann, Heinz Erich. "Toward innovation capability maturity." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1308.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: This research has its roots in Industrial Engineering, where the premise of improving and managing efficiency, effectiveness, productivity and quality is the most common and accepted source of organisational sustenance and furtherance. This dissertation, however, addresses the evolutionary and revolutionary imperatives of a new paradigm for competitive advantage – innovation. The notion of innovation is considered many things. First and foremost, however, it has become the primary differentiator of organisational competitiveness, rendering it the source of sustained long-term prosperity. What may seem ambiguous in the title of this dissertation is essentially the imperative of every organisation functioning within the competitive domain. Where organisational maturity and innovativeness were traditionally considered antonymous, the assimilation of these two seemingly contradictory notions is fundamental to the assurance of long-term organisational prosperity. Organisations are required, now more than ever, to grow and mature their innovation capability. In working towards the fulfilment of this objective, the Maturity Modelling approach was recognised for its ability to describe organisational progression in terms of innovation capability. An Innovation Capability Maturity Model, with the intention of describing generic and evolutionary plateaus of innovation capability maturity, was developed from a comprehensive literature study. This model was evaluated with an initial case study which led to a rigorous refinement initiative that included further literature study, a mapping and comparison exercise, and a detailed analysis of innovation capability themes using a Latent Dirichlet Allocation-based topic modelling approach. The consolidation of these activities and integration with the initial model resulted in the second version thereof – ICMM v2. This second version was then utilised in an additional 5 case studies that would serve to evaluate and validate the content and structure thereof, but also make a fundamental contribution to the application of the model – captured in the so called Innovation Capability Improvement Methodology. The case studies provide evidence that the content and structure of the ICMM v2, including the approach used to convey these aspects, fulfil their intended purpose by appropriately identifying the innovation capability strengths and weaknesses of the represented organisations. The ICMM v2 and accompanying methodology provides an organisation with a systematic approach for identifying organisational innovation capability strengths and weaknesses and a framework for identifying and prioritising innovation capability improvement opportunities in an organised and coordinated manner. This dissertation concludes with a few fundamental findings pertaining to innovation and a discussion of potential future collaboration and research opportunities.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie navorsingsprojek het sy oorsprong binne die bedryfsingenieursdomain. Bedryfsingenieurswese is primêr gerig op die verbetering en bestuur van doelmatigheid, doeltreffendheid, produktiwiteit en gehalte. Dit is voorts „n vry-algemeen aanvaarde bron van organisatoriese volhoubaarheid en verbetering van maatskappye. Hierdie navorsingsverslag spreek die evolusionêre en revolusionêre vereistes van „n nuwe paradigme vir mededingendheid, naamlik innovasie, aan. Die term innovasie beteken verskillende dinge vir verskillende mense. Dit is sedert die 1930‟s intensief nagevors. Meer onlangs het innovasie ontwikkel tot „n primêre onderskeider van maatskappy-mededingendheid. Dit is vinnig besig om te ontwikkel in „n sleutelbron van volhoubare, langtermyn welvaartskepping. Die titel van hierdie proefskrif mag aanvangklik dubbelsinnig klink, maar dit beskryf eintlik die fundamentele vereistes van elke organisasie wat binne die mededingendheidsdomain funksioneer. Aanvanklik is innovasie en organisatoriese volwassenheid as teenstrydige konsepte beskou. Die versoening van hierdie twee oënskynlike teenstrydige konsepte is egter fundamenteel tot die ontwikkeling van langtermyn organisatoriese mededingendheid en gepaargaande welvaart. Mededingendheid word tans verseker deur die tempo en volhoubaarheid waarmee maatskappye hulle innovasie-vermoeë beoefen en uitbou. Die konsep van volwassenheidsmodelering is identifiseer as „n belangrike element om die innovasie volwassenheid van maatskappye volledig uit te bou, asook om organisatoriese groei in ten opsigte van innovasie-vermoeëns te beskryf. „n Eerste orde innovasie-vermoeë volwassenheidsmodel (ICMM v1) is met behulp van „n uitgebreide literatuur-ondersoek ontwikkel. Hierdie model het ten doel gehad om generiese en evolusionêre plateau‟s van innovasie-vermoeë volwassenheid te beskryf. Die aanvanklike model is geëvalueer met „n gevallestudie waarna dit drasties verfyn is, deur gebruik te maak van „n sekondêre literatuurstudie, die kartering en „n vergelykende evaluering, asook „n gedetailleerde ontleding van innovasie-vermoeë tema‟s. Dit is gedoen deur gebruik te maak van “Latent Dirichlet Allocation”-gebaseerde konsepmodellering. Hierdie aktiwiteite is gekonsolideer en geintegreer met die eerste model in „n weergawe twee, wat bekend staan as ICMM v2. Hierdie weergawe is verder ontplooi in vyf opvolg-gevallestudies wat gebruik is. Die doel hiervan was om die nuwe model te evalueer en valideer ten opsigte van die inhoud en struktuur daarvan. Voorts het die ook „n fundamentele bydra gemaak tot die toepassing van die model waartydens resulutate van die model vervat is in „n sogenaamde innovasie-vermoeë verbeterings metodologie. Die onderskeie gevallestudies het bevestig dat die inhoud en die struktuur van die ICMM v2 hulle aanvanklike doelwitte volledig bereik het deur beide die innovasie-vermoeë sterkpunte en swakpunte van die organisasies te identifiseer en uit te lig. Die ICMM v2 en gepaardgaande metodologie bied aan „n organisasie „n sistematiese benadering tot die identifisering van organisatoriese innovasie-vermoeë sterkpunte en swakpunte. Dit voorsien verder „n raamwerk vir die identifisering en prioritisering van innovasie-vermoeë verbeterings geleenthede binne maatskappye. Hierdie proefskrif word afgesluit met „n aantal fundamentele bevindings met betrekking tot innovasie en „n bespreking van toekomstige samewerking ten opsigte van navorsingsgeleenthede.
Jahid, Jamshid, and Jakob Melander. "Innovation Capability in Project-based Organisations : Development and Validation of a Holistic Innovation Capability Assessment Framework (HICAF)." Thesis, Mittuniversitetet, Avdelningen för informations- och kommunikationssystem, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-27916.
Full textFrancis, David Louis. "Assessing and improving innovation capability in organisations." Thesis, University of Brighton, 2000. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.341281.
Full textTORELL, LINA. "Innovation Capability at Electrolux : Screening of innovation challengesand development of action plan." Thesis, KTH, Maskinkonstruktion (Inst.), 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-142547.
Full textThis Master of Science Thesis studies the innovation work in an R&D team at Electrolux. Thestudy strives to identify innovation challenges and activities in order to increase theinnovation capability within the team. The methodology applied in the study is the same asused in PIEp Innovation Pilot Process. PIEp (Product Innovation Engineering program) is aresearch and change program that aims to increase innovation capability of people andorganizations in Sweden. The methodology in PIEp Innovation Pilot Process is divided intoan Innovation Screening and a Change Process. The first part is an analysis that is carried outfrom detailed surveys and interviews regarding the company's innovation capability andidentifies innovation challenges. Based on the analysis a change process is planned inconsultation with the company and is carried out through a workshop. The purpose of theworkshop is to involve the R&D team in the development of an action plan that includesactivities that meet the innovation challenges, targets and responsible persons in the team foreach activity.The result from the analysis show that the creative climate at Electrolux is varying a lotbetween different regions and that the climate in Stockholm is very creative. Further more itemerged from the analysis that the greatest innovation challenges are cross-functionalintegration and cross-regional integration.Nine activities with targets were defined together with the R&D team during the workshop;all of them focusing on the cross-functional and cross-regional integration.The next step for the team is to implement the action plan, perform the defined activities andto evaluate if the desired results are reached. To create a more powerful effect, the sameprocess can be applied at more R&D teams at Electrolux.
Thunberg, Eric. "CROSS-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION : How to Boost Innovation Capability." Thesis, KTH, Maskinkonstruktion (Inst.), 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-170799.
Full textOn the global market the competition between firms is increasing. This require established firms to be flexible and innovative. There are different ways of achieving flexibility without critically changing a firm’s capabilities, out of which one is interfirm collaboration. A way to also avoid competition and gain new perspectives is to engage in cross-industry collaboration. With this in mind, the purpose of this thesis has been to explore how firms engage in cross-industry collaborations to boost their innovation capability.Considering that cross-industry collaborations is a relatively unexplored area within current research, an explorative approach is used in this thesis. The frame of reference that was conducted deals with innovation in general, interfirm collaboration and cross-industry collaboration specifics.In this thesis 17 respondents, with experience in cross-industry collaborations, belonging to 15 firms have been interviewed. The interviews were semi-structured and intended to capture examples of cross-industry collaborations and the respondent firm’s general attitude towards collaboration.The results reflect that firms use cross-industry collaborations in different ways. Out of all the respondents some engage in them to access technologies, some do it to explore potential values, and some do it to gain access to new markets.These results, and more, are then discussed in comparison with current literature, which makes the basis for the conclusions later drawn.The conclusions show that firms in Sweden can and should develop cross-industry collaboration strategies, to be able to maximise the effects on the firms’ innovation capabilities.
Visser, J. D. "Assessing the innovation capability of a research institution." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/6839.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The evolution of the university’s role in national innovation systems has lately received increasing attention in international academic circles, with emphasis on its role in stimulating and sustaining national and regional economic growth. Universities in leading economies have adopted economic development as a third mission, along with the traditional objectives of teaching and research, directly leading to the inception of a technology transfer facilitator as an institutional unit. Translating this mission shift into the context of the Innovation Life Cycle, it seems that universities are involved in a larger part of the innovation process, rather than simply supplying inputs for the innovation funnel of industry. The subsequent need to gain maximum value from research has led innovation management practitioners to consider ways in which the innovation capability of universities can be improved. Several approaches have been documented to improve the performance of a university’s technology transfer office as an isolated entity. Most of these studies, however, have neglected to consider the technology transfer office in the context of the organisation-wide innovation process. The aim of this research is therefore to evaluate the innovation capability of a research institution to enable the improvement of their research commercialisation system. As a foundation the state of research commercialisation, innovation, and the relationship between the two are investigated. This process resulted in the validation that research commercialisation can be modelled by utilising an innovation model. The Innovation Capability Maturity Model version 2 (ICMMv2) of Essmann (1) is subsequently investigated with the aim of applying the model. This in turn leads to the application of the Innovation Capability Improvement Methodology accompanying the ICMMv2 in case study format on Stellenbosch University. The results obtained from the case study are presented in terms of the strengths and weaknesses of the innovation capability of the University. The results were found to be an accurate description of the current issues in the commercialisation system at Stellenbosch University. The latter was validated by individuals tasked with the execution of the research commercialisation process at the University. This, in turn, validates the use of the Innovation Capability Maturity Model for the identification of any aspects that need improvement in order to streamline a university’s research commercialisation efforts.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die evolusie van die universiteit se rol in nasionale innovasie stelsels kry toenemend aandag in internasionale akademiese kringe. Dit beklemtoon universiteite se rol in die stimulering en handhawing van nasionale en plaaslike ekonomiese groei. Universiteite in voorste ekonomieë het ekonomiese ontwikkeling aangeneem as 'n derde missie, saam met die tradisionele missies van onderrig en navorsing. Dit het direk gelei tot die inlywing van ‘n tegnologie-oordrag fasiliteerder as 'n institusionele eenheid. Die verskuiwing van missie in die konteks van die Innovasie lewensiklus, dui daarop dat universiteite betrokke raak in 'n groter deel van die innovasie proses, eerder as om net die verskaffer van insette vir die innovasie tregter van die industrie te wees. Die daaropvolgende vereiste om maksimum waarde te verkry uit navorsing, het veroorsaak dat innovasie bestuur praktisyns verskeie maniere ondersoek waarop die innovasie vermoë van universiteite verbeter kan word. Verskeie benaderings om die prestasie van 'n universiteit se tegnologie-oordrag eenheid as 'n geïsoleerde entiteit te verbeter, is gedokumenteer. Die meeste van hierdie studies het egter nagelaat om die tegnologie-oordrag eenheid te oorweeg in die konteks van die organisasie-wye innovasie proses. Die doel van hierdie navorsing is dus om die innovasie vermoë van 'n navorsingsinrigting te evalueer om die verbetering van hul navorsing kommersialisering stelsel moontlik te maak. As 'n basis word die stand van navorsing kommersialisering, innovasie en die verhouding tussen die twee ondersoek. Hierdie proses het gelei tot die validasie dat navorsing kommersialisering gemodelleer kan word deur middel van 'n innovasie model. Daarna is die Innovation Capability Maturity Model weergawe 2 (ICMMv2) van Essmann(1) ondersoek om ten einde die model toe te pas. Dit word gevolg deur die uitvoering van die Innovation Capability Improvement metodologie, as deel van die ICMMv2, op die Universiteit van Stellenbosch, in ‘n gevallestudie-formaat. Die resultate wat verkry is uit die gevallestudie word in terme van sterk en swak punte met betrekking tot die innovasie vermoë van die Universiteit bespreek. Die resultate is bevind om 'n akkurate beskrywing van die huidige kwessies in die kommersialiseringstelsel by die Universiteit van Stellenbosch te wees. Dit is dan ook bevestig deur sekere individue gemoeid met die uitvoering van die navorsing kommersialiseringproses by die Universiteit. Dit op sy beurt, bekragtig die gebruik van die ICMMv2 vir die identifisering van die aspekte wat verbeter moet word om 'n universiteit se navorsing kommersialiseringpoging vaartbelyn te maak.
Anthony, Das Cecilia. "A Longitudinal Analysis of Malaysia’s Innovation System in Shaping Innovation Capability, 1965–2016." Thesis, Curtin University, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/88428.
Full textSvahn, Fredrik. "Digital Product Innovation : Building Generative Capability through Architectural Frames." Doctoral thesis, Umeå universitet, Institutionen för informatik, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-58009.
Full textOkten, D. "Enabling marketing and innovation capability in the digital economy." Thesis, Bournemouth University, 2013. http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/21077/.
Full textEsterhuizen, Denele. "A knowledge management framework to grow innovation capability maturity." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/85716.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: Innovation is widely considered a key prerequisite for achieving organisational competitiveness and sustained long-term wealth in our increasingly volatile business environment. It is therefore imperative that organisations enable themselves to relentlessly pursue constant innovation; to grow and mature their innovation capability. A study aimed at organisational support by means of business tools toward maturity growth in these innovation capability areas is therefore warranted. Knowledge management plays a fundamental role in the enterprise’s ability to innovate successfully, and the question arises whether knowledge management tools and organisational facilitating conditions can be used to grow innovation capability maturity. The existing literature on the subject is sparse, which led to the following research problem statement: No formal guidelines exist for the use of knowledge management to grow innovation capability maturity. Knowledge conversion is a prominent theme within the knowledge management field. Knowledge creation processes form the core of this knowledge creation model and therefore, one solution to the above-stated problem is to investigate the use of knowledge creation processes to grow innovation capability maturity. This notion provides the platform for aligning knowledge creation processes to the requirements for innovation capability growth from one maturity level to the next as the cornerstone for developing a knowledge management framework that enables innovation capability maturity growth. In order to align these knowledge processes with the requirements for growth in innovation capability maturity, the author identified a knowledge creation path as a key enabler for maturity growth in each innovation capability area. Knowledge management tools and organisational facilitating conditions that support the specific knowledge processes highlighted in the identified path were identified through a literature study and subsequently synthesised to form a framework. The impact of this framework lies in providing guidelines for the use of knowledge management as a vehicle for innovation capability maturity growth.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Innovasie word allerweë beskou as ’n kernvereiste vir die verkryging van organisatoriese mededingendheid en volhoubare langtermynsukses in ons toenemend wisselvallige sake-omgewing. Dit is dus noodsaaklik dat organisasies hulself in staat stel om meedoënloos konstante innovasie na te streef; om hul innovasievermoë uit te brei en volwassenheid daarin te bereik. ’n Studie gemik op organisatoriese ondersteuning deur middel van sake-hulpmiddels ten einde groei in volwassenheid in hierdie innovasievermoë-areas te bereik, is dus nodig. Kennisbestuur speel ’n fundamentele rol in die onderneming se vermoë om suksesvol te innoveer, wat die volgende vraag ontlok: Kan kennisbestuurhulpmiddels en organisatoriese fasiliteringsomstandighede gebruik word om innovasievermoëvolwassenheid te bereik? Die bestaande literatuur oor die onderwerp is gebrekkig, wat aanleiding tot die volgende probleemstelling gegee het: Daar is geen formele riglyne vir die gebruik van kennisbestuur om innovasievermoëvolwassenheid te verbeter nie. Kennisomskakeling is ’n prominente tema in die gebied van kennisbestuur. Kennisskeppingsprosesse vorm die kern van hierdie kennisskeppingsmodel en daarom is een oplossing tot bogenoemde probleem om die gebruik van kennisskeppingsprosesse om innovasievermoëvolwassenheid te verbeter, te ondersoek. Hierdie idee skep ’n platform om kennisskeppingsprosesse met die vereistes vir innovasievermoëverbetering van een volwassenheidsvlak tot die volgende te belyn, as hoeksteen vir die ontwikkeling van ’n kennisbestuurraamwerk om innovasievermoëvolwassenheid te verbeter. Ten einde hierdie kennisprosesse met die vereiste vir groei in innovasievermoëvolwassenheid te belyn, het die outeur ’n kennisskeppingspad as kernelement geïdentifiseer om volwassenheidsgroei in elke innovasievermoë-area in die hand te werk. Kennisbestuurhulpmiddels en organisatoriese fasiliteringsomstandighede wat die spesifieke kennisprosesse wat in die geïdentifiseerde pad uitgelig word, ondersteun, is deur middel van ’n literatuurstudie geïdentifiseer en daarna gesintetiseer om ’n raamwerk te vorm. Die impak van hierdie raamwerk lê daarin om riglyne vir die gebruik van kennisbestuur as ’n middel tot innovasievermoëvolwassenheidsgroei te bied.
Books on the topic "Manifestation of Innovation Capability"
Corsi, Patrick, and Erwan Neau. Innovation Capability Maturity Model. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119144335.
Full textUn, C. Annique. Capability, knowledge, and innovation: Strategies for capability development and performance. [Cambridge, Mass: Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology], 2000.
Find full textDutrénit, Gabriela, Keun Lee, Richard Nelson, Alexandre O. Vera-Cruz, and Luc Soete, eds. Learning, Capability Building and Innovation for Development. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137306937.
Full textSniukas, Marc. Business Model Innovation as a Dynamic Capability. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50100-6.
Full textGagnon, Stéphane. E-business model innovation and capability building. Helsinki: United Nations University : World Institute for Development Economics Research, 2003.
Find full textLearning, capability building and innovation for development. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Find full textO'Connor, Gina Colarelli. Grabbing lightning: Building a capability for breakthrough innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
Find full textWang, Wenao. How should China develop its biopharmaceutical innovation capability? Cambridge, Mass: John F. Kennedy School of Government, 2012.
Find full textJeschke, Sabina. Enabling Innovation: Innovative Capability - German and International Views. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
Find full textQingrui, Xu. Leverage innovation capability: Application of total innovation management in China's SME study. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Pub., 2012.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Manifestation of Innovation Capability"
Haarich, Max, Sylvia Sparschuh, Claudio Zettel, Sven Trantow, and Frank Hees. "Innovative Capability – Learning Capability – Transfer Capability. Promoting Innovation systematically." In Enabling Innovation, 417–33. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24503-9_42.
Full textPeris-Ortiz, Marta, Carlos Devece Carañana, and Carlos Rueda-Armengot. "Process Innovation Capability." In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1884–85. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_200022.
Full textPeris-Ortiz, Marta, Carlos Devece Carañana, and Carlos Rueda-Armengot. "Process Innovation Capability." In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1–2. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200022-1.
Full textGoffin, Keith, and Rick Mitchell. "Innovation – Performance and Capability." In Innovation Management, 345–74. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37344-1_9.
Full textHaarich, Max, Sylvia Sparschuh, Claudio Zettel, Sven Trantow, and Frank Hees. "Innovative Capability - Learning Capability - Transfer Capability. Promoting Innovation systematically." In Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2011/2012, 637–53. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33389-7_50.
Full textEscamilla-Solano, Sandra, Paola Plaza-Casado, and Miguel Prado-Román. "Organizational Capability." In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1791–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_200016.
Full textEscamilla-Solano, Sandra, Paola Plaza-Casado, and Miguel Prado-Román. "Organizational Capability." In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1–4. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200016-1.
Full textCorsi, Patrick, and Erwan Neau. "Innovation: An Unfinished Journey." In Innovation Capability Maturity Model, 3–12. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119144335.ch1.
Full textKodama, Mitsuru. "ICT and Boundary Innovation." In Competing through ICT Capability, 6–22. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137286932_2.
Full textTrantow, Sven, Frank Hees, and Sabina Jeschke. "Innovative Capability – an Introduction to this Volume." In Enabling Innovation, 1–13. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24503-9_1.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Manifestation of Innovation Capability"
Csernai, Zoltán. "Az informatikai gondolkodással kapcsolatos vélekedések az Eszterházy Károly Egyetem osztatlan informatikatanár szakos hallgatói körében." In Networkshop. HUNGARNET Egyesület, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31915/nws.2020.14.
Full textSimamora, Virgo, Lani Diana Wijaya, and Khoirunnisa. "Culinary Purchasing Intention in MSMEs: IT Capability, Innovation Capability." In International Seminar and Call for Paper Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0011977100003582.
Full textWorrall, P. "Capability development for product innovation." In Fifth International Conference on FACTORY 2000 - The Technology Exploitation Process. IEE, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/cp:19970168.
Full textBaryshev, Alexey A. "Entrepreneur`s Trinity and its manifestation under conditions of cognitive capitalism." In International Conference «Responsible Research and Innovation. Cognitive-crcs, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.47.
Full textSulistyo, H. "Enhancing the Innovation Capability Through Knowledge Management Capability and Networking." In Proceedings of the 17 th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200127.028.
Full textGhazali, Nurul Izyan, Choi San Long, and Norfazlina Ghazali. "Knowledge sharing factors and innovation capability." In 2014 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering & Environment (TIME-E). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/time-e.2014.7011638.
Full textRumanti, Augustina Asih, and Trifenaus Prabu Hidayat. "Knowledge internalization for individual innovation capability." In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icmit.2014.6942452.
Full textHandini, Yuslinda Dwi, Edriana Pangestuti, Suharyono, and Sunarti. "Branding Capability, Innovation and Business Performance." In 3rd Annual International Conference on Public and Business Administration (AICoBPA 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210928.006.
Full textMu, zilong. "Research on regional technical innovation capability." In Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icfied-19.2019.46.
Full textHore, Alan, Barry McAuley, and Roger West. "BIM Innovation Capability Programme of Ireland." In Lean and Computing in Construction Congress - Joint Conference on Computing in Construction. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24928/jc3-2017/0079.
Full textReports on the topic "Manifestation of Innovation Capability"
Mohon, Jeremy, Jeffrey Joe, Casey Kovesdi, and Chloe Pedersen. Usability Evaluation of the Innovation Portal and Integrated Capability Analysis Platform. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1822922.
Full textKovesdi, Casey, Kenneth Thomas, Sherman Remer, and Jordan Boyce. Report on the Use and Function of the Integrated Operations Capability Analysis Platform (ICAP) and the LWRS Innovation Portal (IP). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1823416.
Full textRolufs, Angela, Amelia Trout, Kevin Palmer, Clark Boriack, Bryan Brilhart, and Annette Stumpf. Autonomous Transport Innovation (ATI) : integration of autonomous electric vehicles into a tactical microgrid. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/42160.
Full textVakaliuk, Tetiana, Valerii Kontsedailo, Dmytro Antoniuk, Olha Korotun, Serhiy Semerikov, and Iryna Mintii. Using Game Dev Tycoon to Create Professional Soft Competencies for Future Engineers-Programmers. [б. в.], November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4129.
Full textSamji, Salimah, and Mansi Kapoor. Funda Wande through the Lens of PDIA: Showcasing a Flexible and Iterative Learning Approach to Improving Educational Outcomes. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE), January 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-ri_2022/036.
Full textRolufs, Angela, Amelia Trout, Kevin Palmer, Clark Boriack, Bryan Brilhart, and Annette Stumpf. Integration of autonomous electric transport vehicles into a tactical microgrid : final report. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/42007.
Full text