Journal articles on the topic 'Louis Criticism and interpretation'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Louis Criticism and interpretation.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Louis Criticism and interpretation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Puyal, Alfonso. "Primary sources for a definition of Cubism in cinema." Journal of Romance studies 22, no. 1 (March 1, 2022): 133–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/jrs.2022.6.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents four documentary sources in order to elucidate the impact of Cubism and its interpretation in French narrative avant-garde cinema between 1918 and 1923: ‘Cinema and Cubism’, by Louis Delluc; ‘Cubism and Cinema’, by Louis Vauxcelles; ‘Cubist Films’, by Yvan Goll; and ‘Cubism in Cinema’, by Robert Mallet-Stevens. Although filmmaking took certain influences from Cubism after it had been absorbed by other aesthetic movements (Art déco, Purism), the role played by film criticism and theory in the definition of Cubism applied to the cinema is decisive, given that the filmmakers of the French school developed a whole theoretical corpus through which they defended the entry of this new medium into the world of art.
2
Rebrov, Sergey. "LOUIS ALTHUSSER’S CRITIQUE OF THE POLITICAL THEORY." Political Expertise: POLITEX 18, no. 2 (2022): 199–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2022.206.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes various projects of hybridization of materialism and political theory in one conceptual system. Special attention is paid to the critical analysis of the phenomenon of economic materialism of the nineteenth century, which for a long time remained the only example of a materialistic analysis of politics. The subsequent development of materialism that became a new limit of economic determinism, put new problems in the context of the capabilities of materialistic policy. The author proposes to follow the argument of the French philosopher Louis Althusser as a philosophy of aleatory materialism created by the thinker himself, including to substantiate the variations of materialistic understanding of the political. The article consistently disassembled the prerequisites for the crisis of the Marxist economic interpretation of history, which, at the original stage of its own formation, had extremely few common with philosophical materialism. The further struggle of new materialists with the idea of a universal explanatory principle ultimately allowed them to create a new type of philosophical knowledge that is not related to the idea of universal history. The focus in this case is chained to the political aspect of Althusser's Materialism regarding the theory of conjuncture as a genuine object of any materialistic politics. Finally, the author compares aleatory materialism with a number of other directions of post-modern materialistic ontology, whose representatives direct their own criticism towards the anthropological component of the political theory, which, however, leads to the denial of this discipline in principle. Thus, it is Althuserianism that in couple with Schmitterism, are the only examples of a successful project to create a materialistic theory of politics.
3
Adiyanto, Johannes. "Archi-text-ture: Architecting Through Writing." Architectural Research Journal (ARJ) 1, no. 1 (May 12, 2021): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/arj.1.1.3296.1-7.
Full textAbstract:
Architecture is often understood as a real and tangible science, in the form of space and form. This understanding is associated with the origin of the word ‘techne’ which refers to the engineering in the construction process of a building, an architectural work. Writing on new architecture developed around 1968, at a time when architectural criticism by Louis Huxtable became known although the form of writing, identification both in pictures and description, had been done since the time of the Roman Empire by Vitruvius and later interpreted by Leon Battista in the Renaissance. This paper describes descriptively several examples and categories of writing about architecture, especially in Indonesia. The study uses an exploratory study approach with reference to the theory of architectural criticism from Attoe’s understanding. The descriptive exploration of this paper shows there are at least four categories of architectural writing in Indonesia, from those aimed at creating architectural narratives to making architectural texts which are then called archi-text-ture in the paper. The paper is not a final paper, because it is the start of a long textual journey, so it is made as an archi-text-ture construction process and to open up opportunities for further interpretation and development
4
Hrachov, Artem. "Louis Mallet in the Crosshairs of “the Times”: Criticism of Actions of the British Diplomacy in Constantinople at the Beginning of the First World War." Mìžnarodnì zv’âzki Ukraïni: naukovì pošuki ì znahìdki, no. 31 (December 12, 2022): 242–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/mzu2022.31.242.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the publication of “A Mortifying Disclosure” in the British newspaper “The Times” on August 24, 1917, with criticism of British foreign policy towards the Ottoman Empire, in particular the actions of Louis Mallet, the British ambassador in Constantinople. The mentioned publication, as well as the discussion caused by it, are little covered in historiography. Much more information is provided by the primary sources, represented by the documents of the British National Archives (The National Archives, TNA), and also by the memoirs of the participants of researched events. In the mentioned article, Louis Mallet was criticized for short-sightedness and excessive credulity. According to the author of the publication, the Turkish grand vizier deceived the British ambassador, even when the choice of the Ottoman Empire in favor of entering the war on the side of the Central Powers became obvious. In turn, the fact that British diplomats failed to find out about the existence of the German-Turkish treaty became the basis for sharp criticism of the Foreign Office at all. In response to this publication, Louis Mallet spoke in defense of his actions in Constantinople. He was supported by other Foreign Office officials, including former Foreign Secretary Edward Grey. They argued that the Foreign Office was fully aware of the pro-German course of the Porte, but intended to delay the state of war with her as far as possible in order to prepare for the defense of Egypt, the Suez Canal and India. These circumstances led to the accommodating position of British diplomacy. The characteristics of both Mallet himself and the grand vizier of the Ottoman Empire, Said Helim, are separately analyzed from the point of view of historiography and their contemporaries. Also the importance of the defense of India and Egypt, its importance as a key factor in shaping the course of British diplomacy was researched. Finally, the work contains the author's interpretations and evaluations of the analyzed events
5
Smirnova, Natal’ya N. "Image in Mikhail Gershenzon’s Theory of Reading." Vestnik of Kostroma State University 26, no. 4 (January 28, 2021): 148–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2020-26-4-148-154.
Full textAbstract:
The work is devoted to the theory of reading by Mikhail Gershenzon in a double reflection – on the one hand, ideas about myth-creatin specific to the period at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries, on the other hand, critical statements on interpretation strategy, suggested by the scholar. The article discusses the principles of constructing Mikhail Gershenzon’s theoretical ideas in the double focusing view. Considering slow reading not as a method, but as the art of revealing the poet’s vision, Mikhail Gershenzon drew the myth-making potential of poetry (in a broad sense) in the process of interpretation to the interpreted work itself. The art of reading is akin to the art of poetry (artistic creativity), designed to find in the word its living source – myth – to revive the “mystery of the word”. Thus, the poetic image becomes at the same time a way of thinking, merging with it, influencing the very form of thought. Mikhail Gershenzon developed, on the one hand, the theory of the poetic word of Alexander Potebnja, on the other hand, relies on Henri-Louis Bergson’s concept of médiatrice image. Poetic image becomes the dominant feature of Mikhail Gershenzon's reading theory. The criticism of the principles of slow reading reflected the transition to a formalists view on of evolution of artistic creativity as erasure of metaphor and obsolescence of technique.
6
van Miert, Dirk. "Making the States’ Translation (1637): Orthodox Calvinist Biblical Criticism in the Dutch Republic." Harvard Theological Review 110, no. 3 (July 2017): 440–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0017816017000177.
Full textAbstract:
In the study of the history of biblical scholarship, there has been a tendency among historians to emphasize biblical philology as a force which, together with the new philosophy and the new science of the seventeenth century, caused the erosion of universal scriptural authority from the mid-seventeenth century onwards. A case in point is Jonathan Israel's impressive account of how biblical criticism in the hands of Spinoza paved the way for the Enlightenment. Others who have argued for a post-Spinozist rise of biblical criticism include Frank Manuel, Adam Sutcliffe, and Travis Frampton. These scholars have built upon longer standing interpretations such as those of Hugh Trevor-Roper and Paul Hazard. However, scholars in the past two decades such as Anthony Grafton, Scott Mandelbrote and Jean-Louis Quantin have altered the picture of an exegetical revolution inaugurated by Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), Spinoza (1632–1677), and Richard Simon (1638–1712). These heterodox philosophers in fact relied on philological research that had been largely developed in the first half of the seventeenth century. Moreover, such research was carried out by scholars who had no subversive agenda. This is to say that the importance attached to a historical and philological approach to the biblical text had a cross-confessional appeal, not just a radical-political one.
7
Dreon, Roberta. "Dewey After the End of Art." Contemporary Pragmatism 17, no. 2-3 (July 31, 2020): 146–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18758185-01701154.
Full textAbstract:
This article explores the significance of Hegel’s aesthetic lectures for Dewey’s approach to the arts. Although over the last two decades some brilliant studies have been published on the “permanent deposit” of Hegel in Dewey’s mature thought, the aesthetic dimension of Dewey’s engagement with Hegel’s heritage has not yet been investigated. This inquiry will be developed on a theoretical level as well as on the basis of a recent discovery: in Dewey’s Correspondence traces have been found of a lecture on Hegel’s Aesthetics delivered in 1891 within a summer school run by a scholar close to the so-called St. Louis Hegelians. Dewey’s deep and long-standing acquaintance with Hegel’s Aesthetics supports the claim that in his mature book, Art as Experience, he originally appropriated some Hegelian insights. First, Dewey shared Hegel’s strong anti-dualistic and anti-autonomistic conception of the arts, resisting post-Kantian sirens that favored instead an interpretation of art as a separate realm from ordinary reality. Second, they basically converged on an idea of the arts as inherently social activities as well as crucial contributions to the shaping of cultures and civilizations, based on the proximity of the arts to the sensitive nature of man. Third, this article argues that an original re-consideration of Hegel’s thesis of the so-called “end of art” played a crucial role in the formulation of Dewey’s criticism of the arts and of the role of aesthetic experience in contemporary society. The author suggests that we read Dewey’s criticism of the removal of fine art “from the scope of the common or community life” (lw 10, 12) in light of Hegel’s insight that the experience of the arts as something with which believers or citizens can immediately identify belongs to an irretrievable past.
8
Sholekah, Imroatul, and Nurhadi Sasmita. "Djawa Baroe sebagai Media Propaganda Jepang di Jawa (1943-1945)." Historia 4, no. 1 (July 30, 2021): 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.19184/jhist.v4i1.28442.
Full textAbstract:
This study discusses Djawa Baroe as a Japanese Propaganda Media in Java in 1943-1945. Djawa Baroewas a pictorial magazine published during the Japanese Occupation Government in Java as a medium for transferring information to the Dutch East Indies population containing propaganda news. The problems studied in this study are the press policy of the Japanese Occupation Government in Java, the form of Japanese Occupation Government propaganda in the fields of education, literature and art, socio-culture, and military as appearing in Djawa Baroe, as well as examining the impact of Japanese Occupation Government propaganda in the fields. The method used in this study was the historical method from Louis Gottschalk, which includes the stages of data collection, source criticism, interpretation and historiography. This study uses a political science approach and propaganda theory developed by Miriam Budiarjo and Laswell. When controlling the Dutch East Indies, the Japanese Occupation Government used the press as a means of propaganda, one of which was through Djawa Baroe. The pictures displayed in Djawa Baroe form a picture of every activity carried out by the Dutch East Indies in the fields of education, literature and art, socio-culture and military as an activity that seemed perfect for wartime. In fact, in real life, the activities displayed in Djawa Baroe are not the same, because the Javanese people experienced many hardships in life during the war.
9
Perloff, Marjorie. "What Really Happened? Kenneth Goldsmith’s “7+ Deaths and Disasters,” Sophie Calle’s, Take Care of Yourself." Synthesis: an Anglophone Journal of Comparative Literary Studies, no. 11 (October 18, 2019): 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/syn.20894.
Full textAbstract:
In Seven American Deaths and Disasters (2013), Kenneth Goldsmith recounted a set of tragic and unanticipated events in recent American history by using transcriptions of radio and TV broadcasts, usually from minor networks. Designed to be an “eighthAmerican disaster,” Goldsmith presented The Body of Michael Brown, a performance based on the St. Louis autopsy report at the “Interrupt 3” conference at Brown University(13 March 2015), eliciting widespread criticism and controversy. Seemingly very different from Goldsmith—Sophie Calle’s projects, for the past few decades, set up particularprocedural processes that raise pressing epistemological questions, especially about the nature of relationships, personal and political. One of her recent projects, Prenez soin de vous (Take Care of Yourself) that was based on her installation for the Venice Biennale in 2007, comprises comments by 107 women on an email that Calle received from her then lover. In this project, Calle uses the “real” words of others to create a montage of possible interpretations of the discourse that confronts us in our daily lives. For Calle, as for Goldsmith, the most troubling gap is that between information and knowledge, while the issue, that a conceptual poetics can take as a premise, is that the body most difficult to getinside of turns out to be one’s own.
10
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. "Histoire de la famille et histoire des mentalités." Historical Papers 18, no. 1 (April 26, 2006): 136–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/030903ar.
Full textAbstract:
Asbtract This year's Distinguished Historian, Professor Jean-Louis Flandrin of the Université de Paris 8 - Vincennes and the Ecole des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, surveyed the state of his major field of interest, the inter-relationship between family and psychological history. These are relatively new fields, and the links between them are comparatively unexplored as a result. Yet, in spite of some false starts, much has been accomplished, the work-in-progress contains great promise and the possible avenues for future work are almost limitless. Much will be achieved if the crossfertilization of the various disciplines continues. The author then reviews the sub-fields of family history, and cites those works, both published and unpublished, which appear to offer fresh insights and/or research approaches. Problems and weaknesses are also considered. For example, while Georges Duby's book, Le chevalier, la femme et le prêtre is highly praised as a pathfinding study which should be the inspiration for much future work in the area of the study of the evolution of Christian marriage, Professor Flandrin outlines his reservations regarding certain of Duby's theses. Similarly, the work of Edward Shorter and Elizabeth Bandinter receives more than passing criticism. Professor Flandrin devotes the greatest amount of comment to the topic of the quality and nature of interfamily relations over time - a topic which, he concludes, has roused much sterile and unproductive debate but which is richly documented in the sources and ought to be the object of considerable research in the future. Other topics of comment include a) the size and structure of the domestic unit b) the nature of family ties c) the intermarriage of family members d) the various motivations for marriage over time e) the evolution of the notion of a Christian marriage f) the mores surrounding sexual relations within marriage g) feelings between and among family members The author concludes with a warning of the need to be sensitive to the variety of interpretation possible in assessing historical behaviour which may vary widely from our own contemporary cultural norms.
11
Colahan, Clark. ""Le nouveau-gentilhomme" de Mme d'Aulnoy: factores trans-culturales en la calibración de la salud mental de don Quijote." Tropelías: Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada, no. 29 (December 1, 2017): 330–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.26754/ojs_tropelias/tropelias.2018291559.
Full textAbstract:
La interpretación pan-europea de la personalidad de don Quijote empezó y siguió por todo el XVII enfocada en la comicidad de su locura, pero con el paso de los siglos ha vivido distintas etapas que reflejan las preocupaciones de las culturas que lo consideran hijo suyo. Los existencialistas del XX, herederos de la exaltación romántica del rebelde individualista, lo veían cuerdo, un modelo moral para imitar en una sociedad corrupta, a pesar de que Cervantes, y con él la crítica historicista, ponía hincapié en la resequedad de su cerebro. En el XXI el posmodernismo, inmerso en rápidos cambios mundiales, lo considera un actor que astutamente transforma su personalidad según las circunstancias. Madame d’Aulnoy, aristócrata de la corte de Louis XIV, conocía bien el Quijote y vivió un tiempo en España, pero empezó a escribir una historia de marco para una colección de sus cuentos de hadas con el típico desprecio de su clase por un burgués de sueños caballerescos que ambiciona colarse entre los ‘bien nacidos’. Sin embargo, ella no pudo dejar de percibir las similitudes entre este y su propia situación como forjadora de historias fantásticas, y decide que su protagonista va a triunfar. Dando fin a la novela desde una auténtica perspectiva cervantina de haz y envés, se deja llevar, si bien a regañadientes, por el soñador que se imagina un mundo menos exigente.
The pan-European interpretation of Don Quixote’s personality began, and continued to be throughout the 17th century, focused on his comical madness, but with the passing of the centuries that view has shifted to various alternatives that reflect the concerns of the cultures that consider him theirs. 20th-century existentialists, heirs to the Romantic exaltation of individualist rebels, saw him as sane, a moral model to be imitated in a corrupt society, in spite of the fact that Cervantes, and with him historicist criticism, stressed that his brain had dried up. In the 21st century postmodernism, caught up in rapid worldwide changes, consider him an actor who cleverly transforms his personality to fit the circumstances. Madame d’Aulnoy, an aristocrat at the court of Louis XIV, knew Don Quixote well and lived for a time in Spain, but still she began to write a frame story for a collection of her fairytales with typically upper-class scorn for a bourgeois with chivalric dreams whose ambition is to be accepted among the ‘well born,’ and so she decides to have her main character win out. Writing an end to the novel from an authentically Cervantine perspective of seeing both sides of the coin, she lets herself be carried away, even though she fights against it, by the dreamer who imagines a less demanding world.
12
Mantu, Rahman, and Siti Aisa. "PERKEMBANGAN RELIGIOUS STUDIES DI BARAT PANDANGAN ORIENTALIS DAN PEMAKNAAN ATAS AGAMA." Potret Pemikiran 23, no. 1 (November 28, 2019): 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.30984/pp.v23i1.998.
Full textAbstract:
Western intellectuals are so concerned about religious studies. Their arguments are the subject of criticism and studies that continue to this day. the debate is about the position of religion whether as a way of life, belief, belief in something that is supernatural or religion as an object of study that can be interpreted with a logical scientific approach. This article will answer questions regarding the interpretation of religion by orientalists. Some names such as Max Muller to Charles Adams contributed thought. By using a comparative library analysis, the writer maps the ideas, ideas, and concepts of western scholars to the meaning of religion and the results of each orientalist express their thoughts that religion can function in accordance with the approach used, be it cultural, social, political , and economics. Keywords: Orientalist; West; Religion; Scientific; Confidence. Intelektual Barat begitu memberikan perhatian terhadap studi agama. argumentasi mereka menjadi bahan kritikan dan kajian yang berlangsung terus menerus hingga hari ini. perdebatannya ada pada soal kedudukan agama apakah sebagai pedoman hidup, kepercayaan, keyakinan atas sesuatu yang gaib sifatnya ataukah agama sebagai objek studi yang bisa di maknai dengan pendekatan ilmiah yang logis. Artikel ini akan menjawab pertanyaan berkenaan dengan pemaknaan atas agama oleh para orientalis. Beberapa nama seperti Max Muller sampai Charles Adams memberikan sumbangsih pemikiran. Dengan menggunakan analisis kepustakaan yang komparatif, penulis melakukan pemetaan atas ide, gagasan, serta konsep para sarjanawan barat terhadap pemaknaan atas agama dan didapati hasilnya masing-masing orientalis mengemukakan pikirannya bahwa agama bisa berfungsi sesuai dengan pendekatan yang digunakan, baik itu budaya, sosial, politik, maupun ekonomi. Kata kunci: Orientalis; Barat; Agama; Ilmiah; Keyakinan
13
Kirkham, Michael, and Alan Heuser. "Selected Literary Criticism of Louis MacNeice." Canadian Journal of Irish Studies 15, no. 1 (1989): 123. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25512776.
Full text
14
Zaret, David, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Contemporary Sociology 17, no. 1 (January 1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.
Full text
15
Senchuk, Dennis M., and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Noûs 26, no. 3 (September 1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.
Full text
16
Gorski, Philip S. "SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM." Zygon� 25, no. 3 (September 1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.
Full text
17
Rosen, Bernard. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (November 1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.
Full text
18
Rosen, Bernard, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (November 1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.
Full text
19
Green, Joel B. "Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation." Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, no. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421422.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In recent years, theological interpretation of Christian Scripture has often been distinguished by its wholesale antipathy toward history and/or to historical criticism. Working with a typology of different forms of "historical criticism," this essay urges (1) that historical criticism understood as reconstruction of "what really happened" and/or historical criticism that assumes the necessary segregation of "facts" from "faith" is inimical to theological interpretation; (2) that this form of historical criticism is increasingly difficult to support in light of contemporary work in the philosophy of history; and (3) that contemporary theological interpretation is dependent on expressions of historical criticism concerned with the historical situation within which the biblical materials were generated, including the sociocultural conventions they take for granted.
20
Green, Joel B. "Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation." Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, no. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.5.2.0159.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract In recent years, theological interpretation of Christian Scripture has often been distinguished by its wholesale antipathy toward history and/or to historical criticism. Working with a typology of different forms of "historical criticism," this essay urges (1) that historical criticism understood as reconstruction of "what really happened" and/or historical criticism that assumes the necessary segregation of "facts" from "faith" is inimical to theological interpretation; (2) that this form of historical criticism is increasingly difficult to support in light of contemporary work in the philosophy of history; and (3) that contemporary theological interpretation is dependent on expressions of historical criticism concerned with the historical situation within which the biblical materials were generated, including the sociocultural conventions they take for granted.
21
Morrow, Jeffrey L. "The Politics of Biblical Interpretation: A ‘Criticism of Criticism’." New Blackfriars 91, no. 1035 (August 12, 2010): 528–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2009.01342.x.
Full text
22
Rosenberg, Ruth, and Jerome J. McGann. "Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation." South Central Review 3, no. 4 (1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3189693.
Full text
23
SELLING, Joseph A. "Louis Janssens' Interpretation of Aquinas." Louvain Studies 19, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): 65–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/ls.19.1.2013748.
Full text
24
Davies, Paul, Greta Gaard, and Patrick D. Murphy. "Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy." Modern Language Review 95, no. 4 (October 2000): 1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3736723.
Full text
25
Woodward, Michael. "Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation." Theological Librarianship 2, no. 1 (April 27, 2009): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31046/tl.v2i1.74.
Full text
26
Robbins, Vernon K. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Rhetorica 3, no. 2 (1985): 145–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.2.145.
Full text
27
Fowler, Robert M., and George A. Kennedy. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Journal of Biblical Literature 105, no. 2 (June 1986): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3260415.
Full text
28
Slater, Niall W. "‘Against Interpretation’: Petronius and art Criticism." Ramus 16, no. 1-2 (1987): 165–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0048671x00003295.
Full textAbstract:
For forty years a debate has raged in Petronian studies between the moralists and, for want of a better term, the anti-moralists. From Highet in the 1940's to Bacon and Arrowsmith in the 1950's and 60's, the moralists held a certain advantage. Whatever important divergences there were among these critics, all agreed on a Petronius who stood in some critical relation to his society. The dissenting voices have grown much louder of late. Ironically, the literary brilliance of Arrowsmith's New Critical reading of the Satyricon helped to turn the tide against the moralist viewpoint. The more apparent the literary sophistication of the Satyricon has become, the less willing late twentieth century readers have been to see a programmatic moral critique as its main purpose. Sullivan's view of Petronius as a ‘literary opportunist’ has come to dominate the field.With Graham Anderson's book, Eros Sophistes: Ancient Novelists at Play, the retreat from the position of Highet is now complete. We have finally reached the logical, New Critical conclusion that the Satyricon is an entirely self-contained literary game without any message whatsoever; in effect we are told that, like any serious piece of literature, the Satyricon ‘should not mean, but be’. Anderson is eager to disavow ‘the unproven conviction that every work must have a message, however diffusely or perversely expressed’.
29
Herbert, T. Walter, Roberta Rubenstein, and Amy Schrager Lang. "Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Interpretation." American Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1987): 656. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2713134.
Full text
30
Evans, R. L. S., and George A. Kennedy. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Classical World 80, no. 3 (1987): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4350026.
Full text
31
Arutynyan, J. I. "Contemporary art criticism: judgment and interpretation." Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture, no. 1 (30) (March 2017): 177–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2020-3-177-180.
Full textAbstract:
An important question of contemporary art studies is the problem of expanding the methodological base of the discipline. Modern art criticism refl ects the fundamental problems of contemporary art. Clash of the axiological approaches and the principle of interpretation, subjectivity, the infl uence of requests of the art market and commercialization are the main problems of formation of the expressive language of art criticism in the 20th–21st centuries
32
Perry, John Oliver, and G. N. Devy. "Indian Literary Criticism: Theory and Interpretation." World Literature Today 77, no. 1 (2003): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40157830.
Full text
33
Dietrich, Richard S. "Book Review: Interpretation and Social Criticism." Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 42, no. 3 (July 1988): 310–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438804200315.
Full text
34
Taylor, James E. "Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism." Philosophy Compass 2, no. 4 (July 2007): 611–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00088.x.
Full text
35
CAN GÜRBÜZ, Gülsevim. "Araştırıcı Sanat Eleştirisi ve Bir Sanat Eleştirisi Örneği." Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences 7, no. 14 (December 10, 2021): 150–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.7.14.7.
Full textAbstract:
Art criticism can be described as an examination, determination, and mental activity that seeks the value of an art work. In an art criticism, different analysis strategies and methods can be chosen for the related artwork. Edmund Burke Feldman's “researching art criticism” criticism model, which is determined as a method in thearticle, is one of them. In th earticle, it is aimed to examine the method of “researching art criticism” in general, and in particular, to criticize Paula Rego’s artwork called “The Maids” with this method. For this criticism, “description, analysis, interpretation and judgment-evaluation” phases for the work were formed. Description and analysis subheadings are included in the “results section”. The other two subheadings, which include the relationship, interpretation and evaluation of the results section’s informations, are also considered as the “discussion section”. Keywords: Art criticism, Feldman model of criticism, Description, Analysis, İnterpretation, Judgment, Evaluation, Paula Rego, The Maids
36
Ridwan, MK. "TRADISI KRITIK TAFSIR: Diskursus Kritisisme Penafsiran dalam Wacana Qur’anic Studies." Jurnal THEOLOGIA 28, no. 1 (September 14, 2017): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/teo.2017.28.1.1418.
Full textAbstract:
<div class="Section1"><p class="Iabstrak"><strong>Abstract: </strong><em>This paper aims to discuss the methodology of interpretation criticism in the qur'anic studies discourse. As new plots in the Qur'an studies, the interpretation criticism has not been much sought after by Qur’anic scholars. As a consequence, in methodological discourse has not yet found a definite method can be used to criticize an interpretation. As for the thought-provoking critique of the interpretation for this still are sporadic and likely are political-ideological. For that, it needs special attention in developing area studies the Quran towards the study criticism of interpretation. Finally, this paper gives the conclusion that, in the discourse of criticism the methodological framework needed interpretation, as a step towards the operational interpretation of criticism. So, the criticism was done not nuanced political-ideological, but able to uphold the values of objectivity, comprehensiveness, scientific and systematic. There are at least four operational steps in carrying out work interpretation of criticism of the region of ontology, epistemology, and axiology i.e; Firstly, the critic must understand the substance of exegesis are an interpretation as process and interpretation as a product. Secondly, understand the construction of criticism interpretation, namely the construction of the historicity of the critique, the base of criticism, the purpose of criticism, as well as the principles and parameters of criticism. Thirdly, start working with two regions exegesis critique work i.e; intrinsic and extrinsic criticism. Fourthly, give the evaluation and assessment of the object of study of criticism that is good and decent, or perverted and unworthy of being used.</em></p><p class="Iabstrak"><strong>Abstrak:</strong> Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mendiskusikan metodologi kritik tafsir dalam diskursus wacana Qur’anic Studies. Sebagai wilayah garapan baru dalam studi al-Qur’an, kritik tafsir belum banyak diminati oleh kalangan sarjana al-Qur’an. Akibatnya, dalam wacana metodologis belum banyak ditemukan metodebaku yang dapat digunakan untuk mengkritisi sebuah tafsir. Adapun pemikiran kritik tafsir selama ini masih bersifat sporadis dan cenderung bersifat politis-ideologis. Untuk itulah dibutuhkan perhatian khusus dalam mengembangkan wilayah studi al-Qur’an ke arah studi kritik tafsir. Akhirnya, tulisan ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa, dalam diskursus kritisisme penafsiran, dibutuhkan kerangka metodologis sebagai langkah operasional kritik tafsir. Sehingga, kritik yang dilakukan tidak bernuansa politis-ideologis, namun mampu mengedepankan nilai-nilai objektivitas, komprehensivitas, ilmiah dan sistematis. Setidaknya terdapat empat langkah operasional dalam melaksanakan kerja kritik tafsir yang bermuara pada wilayah ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis yaitu; Pertama, kritikus harus terlebih dahulu memahami hakikat tafsir yakni tafsir sebagai proses (<em>interpretation as process</em>) dan tafsir sebagai produk (interpretation as product). Kedua, memahami konstruksi kritik tafsir, yaitu historisitas kritik, landasan kritik, tujuan kritik, serta prinsip dan parameter kritik. Ketiga, memulai kerja kritik tafsir dengan dua wilayah kerja yaitu; kritik intrinsik dan kritik ekstrinsik. Keempat, memberikan evaluasi dan penilaian terhadap objek kajian kritik yaitu, baik (<em>maḥmūd</em>) dan layak pakai (<em>maqbūl</em>), atau menyeleweng (<em>munḥarif</em>) dan tidak layak digunakan (<em>mardūd</em>).</p></div>
37
JEON, Kyung-Jin. "A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche." Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (December 31, 2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.02.
Full text
38
JEON, Kyung-Jin. "A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche." Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (December 31, 2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.2.
Full text
39
Jabborova, Dilafruz. "Interpretation of Fitrat Dramas in Literary Criticism." International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 9, no. 12 (December 31, 2021): 2437–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.39332.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract: This article examines the fact that after the independence of Uzbekistan, the works of modern literature began to be reevaluated on the basis of new approaches. Literary scholar Ilhom Ganiev's monograph "Poetics of Fitrat dramas" is analyzed and the poetic world of the playwright is covered. The article is based on the analysis of the physicist's focus on Fitrat's character creation skills, the symbolic and figurative motives used in dramas, and the use of artistic language. Keywords and word expressions: drama, jadid literature, criticism, natural science, jadid studies, jadid writers, playwright, drama, symbolism, theater, tragedy, soviet ideology, “Abulfayzkhan”, confection, “Hindu ihtilotonzhon”, conflict, independence ideas, poetic thought, hermeneutic thinking, vulgar-sociological approach, principle, reassessment, new scientific and aesthetic thinking, systematic approach, analysis and interpretation, hermeneutics, synergetics, structuralism, historical-biographical approach, historical-cultural approach, modernism, absurdity, existentialism.
40
Pelias, Ronald J. "Schools of interpretation thought and performance criticism." Southern Speech Communication Journal 50, no. 4 (December 1985): 348–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372640.
Full text
41
NANNICELLI, TED. "Ethical Criticism and the Interpretation of Art." Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75, no. 4 (October 2017): 401–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12395.
Full text
42
Kaufman, Daniel A. "Interpretation and the “Investigative” Concept of Criticism." Angelaki 17, no. 1 (March 2012): 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725x.2012.671635.
Full text
43
West, David W. "Practical Criticism: I.A. Richards' experiment in interpretation." Changing English 9, no. 2 (October 2002): 207–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1358684022000006311.
Full text
44
Wicaksono, Arif. "Pandangan Kekristenan Tentang Higher Criticism." FIDEI: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika dan Praktika 1, no. 1 (June 23, 2018): 115–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.34081/fidei.v1i1.6.
Full textAbstract:
The interpretation of the Bible in the present continues to grow rapidly. This progress has both positive and negative effects in the realm of biblical interpretation. The positive impact that is with the progress of interpretation, it was found many truth values that were not understood and now start out one by one. The negative as the progress of biblical interpretation is the loss of boundaries. With the method of high-criticism interpretation makes the Bible originally believed to be the infallible Word, and now it is equated with another book of lesser value than the scriptures. The Bible is aligned with the ordinary book, even the authority of the Bible as God's Word is in doubt, denied and demeaned to an ordinary literary work.This is a challenge for Christianity today. It takes a firm stance in the face of the Higher Criticism interpretation movement. Christians need to determine a position to deflect any allegations that undermine the authority of the Bible and any allegations that cast doubt on the inspiration and revelation of the existing Scriptures. This paper is expected to give a little apologetic response to the Higher Criticism movement Keywords: Higher Criticism, Apologetic, Bible AbstrakPenafsiran Alkitab dalam masa kini terus mengalami perkembangan dengan pesat. Kemajuan ini memberikan dampak positif maupun negative dalam ranah dunia tafsir Alkitab. Positive karena dengan kemajuannya banak nilai-nilai kebenaran yang dul tidak dipahami mulai keluar satu persatu. Negatifnya saat kemajuan penafsiran Alkitab kehilangan batasan, dengan metode penafsiran higher Critism menjadikan Alkitab yang awalnya diyakini sebagai Firman yang tanpa salah, layaknya buku lain yang nilainya lebih rendah dari kitab suci. Aklitab disejajarkan dengan buku biasa. Bahkah otoritas Alkitab sebagai Firman Allah diragukan, disangkal dan direndahkan sebatas karya sastra biasa.Ini merupakan tantangan bagai kekristenan saat ini. Diperlukan sikap yang tegas dalam menghadapi pergerakan penafsiran Higher Critism. Orang Kristen perlu menentukan posisi dalam menangkis segala tuduhan yang merendahkan otoritas Alkitab. Segala tuduhan yang meragukan pengilhaman dan pewahyuan penulisan kitab Suci yang ada. Tulisan ini diharapkan memberikan sedikit sikap apologetika terhadap gerakan Higer Critism Kata Kunci: Higer Critism, Apologet, Alkitab
45
Rabbany T, Al-Faiz M., and Indal Abror. "TAFSIR PROGRESIF ATAS KISAH-KISAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN KARYA EKO PRASETYO." Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 19, no. 1 (October 12, 2019): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-05.
Full textAbstract:
Kitab Pembebasan is Eko Prasetyo’s first work in the field of interpretation contains the stories of prophets and friends in the Qur'an. For him, the stories of the prophets no longer have the power to change circumstances, then progressive logic brings Eko to an interpretation of the stories of the prophet to the surrounding social problems. When many commentators who interpret the Quran relate to the social community, then interpreting the Quran leads to social criticism being unique to discuss. So this paper is focused on discussing social criticism in the Book of Liberation. In this paper, there are indications of the content of social criticism Eko Prasetyo then grouped them into five fields, namely economics, religion, education, politics and society. Then explained based on the theme specifically. Then develop social criticism based on each theme. Among them is a criticism of the economic system of capitalism, interpretation of the meaning of Satan, tyranny, seditious and idolatrous, religious and financiers, criticism of Suharto and the New Order, the case of the murderous activist Salim deer. Also, Eko's other works were reviewed to develop his criticisms. The interpretation for Eko through the Book of Liberation is the contextualization of the problems that occur around him, Eko does not care about the interpretation of the interpretation, because for Eko, the Qur'an is a book of movements that must be practiced.Keyword: Eko Prasetyo, Progressive Interpretations, Qissah, al-Qur’an
46
Moberly, R. W. L. "Biblical Criticism and Religious Belief." Journal of Theological Interpretation 2, no. 1 (2008): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421447.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Moberly discusses John Barton's Nature of Biblical Criticism and takes issue with Barton's portrayal of theological interpretation as hostile to the values of biblical criticism. After showing how Barton misrepresents theological interpretation, not least because of a failure to do justice to the changing frames of reference of critical scholarship, Moberly extends the discussion to include the preunderstandings that interpreters inevitably bring to the Bible in ways analogous to how one reads a classic; the way in which appreciation of deep literature relates to personal maturity; and the way in which theological dogma, rightly understood, can make truer one's perception of reality.
47
Moberly, R. W. L. "Biblical Criticism and Religious Belief." Journal of Theological Interpretation 2, no. 1 (2008): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.2.1.0071.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Moberly discusses John Barton's Nature of Biblical Criticism and takes issue with Barton's portrayal of theological interpretation as hostile to the values of biblical criticism. After showing how Barton misrepresents theological interpretation, not least because of a failure to do justice to the changing frames of reference of critical scholarship, Moberly extends the discussion to include the preunderstandings that interpreters inevitably bring to the Bible in ways analogous to how one reads a classic; the way in which appreciation of deep literature relates to personal maturity; and the way in which theological dogma, rightly understood, can make truer one's perception of reality.
48
Uniłowski, Krzysztof, and Jakob Ziguras. "Textualism, Materialism, Immersion, Interpretation." Praktyka Teoretyczna 34, no. 4 (December 15, 2019): 13–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/prt2019.4.2.
Full textAbstract:
Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses.Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left– we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. The issues raised in this erudite and formally complex piece include such fundamental questions as: in what sense do the fictional worlds resemble the non-fictional one, and how do we inhabit them? What’s the relationship between immersion and interpretation? What real-life figures can help us imagine or visualise our intimate yet inherently social relationship with the fictional (are we guests, dwellers, passersby...)? Uniłowski looks for answers in contemporary Marxist criticism (Eagleton, Jameson, Berardi), sci-fi and fantasy writing (Lem, Sapkowski, Martin), as well as modern continental philoso phy (Gadamer, Heidegger) and – in the last part of the essay – contemporary game studies. We’re happy to be able to present Uniłowski’s piece in two versions, the original Polish as well as its English translation (by Jakob Ziguras). In order to preserve the unmistakable flow of Uniłowski’s thought in English, small changes were introduced – with the author’s full approval – in the English version. We trust that our Polish-speaking readers will fin the comparison of the two versions interesting and instruc tive, as they seem to give a unique insight into Uniłowski’s writing process.
49
이재호. "An Interpretation of Criticism of Elementary Moral Instruction." KOREAN ELEMENTARY MORAL EDUCATION SOCIETY ll, no. 31 (December 2009): 117–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17282/ethics.2009..31.117.
Full text
50
Song, Youngmog. "Textual Criticism and Interpretation of Matthew 23:26." Journal of Biblical Text Research 50 (April 30, 2022): 60–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.28977/jbtr.2022.4.50.60.
Full text