Academic literature on the topic 'LINGUISTICS ACTION'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'LINGUISTICS ACTION.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "LINGUISTICS ACTION"
Pan, Mingwei, and Xiucai Fang. "Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action." System 41, no. 3 (September 2013): 889–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.002.
Full textLei, L. "Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action." ELT Journal 67, no. 4 (August 10, 2013): 503–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct044.
Full textCowley, Stephen J. "Reading: skilled linguistic action." Language Sciences 84 (March 2021): 101364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101364.
Full textTemer, Verónica González, and Richard Ogden. "Non-convergent boundaries and action ascription in multimodal interaction." Open Linguistics 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 685–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0170.
Full textMartin, James R. "DESIGN AND PRACTICE: ENACTING FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS." Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20 (January 2000): 116–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s026719050020007x.
Full textCouper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. "What does grammar tell us about action?" Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24, no. 3 (September 1, 2014): 623–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou.
Full textZhou, Yan. "Revisiting the Modal Verb huì with an Interactional Linguistic Approach." Languages 7, no. 4 (November 21, 2022): 294. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/languages7040294.
Full textHoye, J. Matthew. "Rhetorical Action and Constitutive Politics." Rhetorica 37, no. 3 (2019): 286–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.2019.37.3.286.
Full textGerwing, Jennifer, and Janet Bavelas. "Linguistic influences on gesture’s form." Gesture 4, no. 2 (February 11, 2005): 157–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.2.04ger.
Full textWang, Xiaoyun. "Managing a suspended course of action." Chinese Language and Discourse 11, no. 2 (November 24, 2020): 306–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cld.20011.wan.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "LINGUISTICS ACTION"
Marley-Payne, Jack. "Action-first attitudes." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107094.
Full textPage 166 blank. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 157-165).
In this thesis, I present an action-first theory of knowledge and belief. We have a mutual interest in the successful action of our peers, and the significance of belief and knowledge stems from their role in promoting this success. Knowledge states tend to guide successful action, in an appropriately systematic manner. Belief states systematically guide our attempts to achieve our goals, and would lead to success if all went well. In defending the action-first account, I draw on a kind of pragmatism: we should look to the practical role of belief and knowledge attribution, in a social setting, to determine the nature of belief and knowledge themselves. The action-account states that the role of knowledge attribution is to identify and promote successful agents. This implies that knowledge itself is a state that tends to guide successful action. Similarly, the role of belief attribution is to help us predict how people will attempt to achieve their goals, and correct them to avoid failure where necessary. This implies that beliefs are action-guiding states that may not be success conducive - these are states that are apt to become knowledge given the appropriate evidence or argument. A final point is that the role of our ascriptions of rationality (and irrationality) is to promote practices that tend to lead to knowledge. This gives us a unified account of our concepts of knowledge, belief and rationality, founded in a cooperative society's interest in mutual success. Granting the action-account leads to significant consequences in epistemology and philosophy of mind. It gives us reason to reject various accessibility principles, and accept intellectualism with regard to know-how. All states that lead to successful action in a systematic manner, even if we do not consciously endorse their content, fit with the rationale of the action-account. Further, the account suggests a new way to model conflicted mental states, and suggests rethinking the role of the Bayesian ideal in our conception of rationality. These consequences, in turn, provide motivation for the action-account itself on pragmatic grounds: it opens up promising new lines of inquiry in philosophy.
by Jack Marley-Payne.
Ph. D.
Streiffer, Robert (Robert Keith) 1970. "Moral relativism and reasons for action." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9369.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. [103]-105).
There are many varieties of moral relativism. Appraiser relativism, according to which the proposition expressed by a moral sentence varies from context to context, is motivated by the thought that it provides the best explanation of the intractability of fundamental moral disagreements. In response, it is standardly objected that appraiser relativism runs afoul of our linguistic intuitions about when people are contradicting one another. In Chapter One, I expand upon this objection in three ways: (i) the problematic class of intuitions is larger than has previously been noticed; (ii) three strategies that have been offered to explain away those intuitions fail; and (iii) even if we grant that appraiser relativism is true, it still would not provide us with any explanation whatsoever of the intractability of the relevant disagreements. Agent relativism, according to which there are no universal moral requirements, is motivated by the thought that there are always reasons to comply with one's moral requirements, but that the desires to which such reasons would have to correspond are too capricious for there to be any universal moral requirements. In Chapter Two, I argue that the moral universalist is free to maintain either (i) that any fully rational, fully informed agent will have a desire that would be served by complying with what the moral universalist takes to be universal moral requirements, and so desires are not too capricious, or (ii) that a naturalistically acceptable account of reasons need not suppose that reasons are grounded in desires. Either way, the moral universalist is free to reject this motivation for agent relativism. If desires do not provide the basis for reasons for action, what does? In Chapter Three, I give an analysis of reasons for action based on the ways in which an action can be good or bad. I argue that the analysis is preferable to two other analyses, and that it provides a promising explanation of why there are always reasons for agents to comply with their moral requirements. I conclude, however, that the analysis relies on distinctions which, despite being intuitively plausible, remain in need of theoretical justification.
by Robert Streiffer.
Ph.D.
Simon, Steven H. 1957. "Contributions to a physicalistic theory of action." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8145.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. 139-141).
My project of giving a general physicalistic reduction of action contrasts with Donald Davidson's view that only individual actions can be explained in physicalistic terms. The main reason for his view is that he thinks the problem of internal causal deviance is insoluble. In the first chapter, I reconstruct the theory of action Davidson develops in Essays and Events and extend the theory to solve the deviance problem. The idea of the solution is that action requires "modulated movement," an ongoing process of monitoring and modulating the movements in which actions consist. In the second chapter, I develop the theory of modulated movement in more detail and argue that it can explain a number of cases of defective agency. I defend my contention that the analysis of modulated movement solves the deviance problem against several objections. In doing so, one of the main points I argue is that "ballistic movements," movements the agent cannot modify, cannot be actions. The psychological states in terms of which I analyze modulated movement are belief and desire, and in the third chapter I develop a reductive physicalistic account of a component of belief, indication. I start with a theory of indication that Robert Stalnaker presents in Inquiry, anddevelop the theory to cope with some problems for it that I identify. In the second part of the chapter, I extend the theory to explain cases of indication in which indicators are combined so that together they indicate propositions more specific or precise than any of the propositions they indicate alone, thus reducing complex cases of indication to simpler ones.
by Steven H. Simon.
Ph.D.
Baron-Schmitt, Nathaniel. "Doing : an essay on causation, events, and action in the most general sense." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129123.
Full textPage 163 blank. Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 149-162).
Our world is populated not just by things, such as bombs, matches, and people, but also by events, like explosions, ignitions, and decisions. Part I, "Doings", is centered around my attempt to capture the nature of events. Events straddle the realms of thing and fact, eluding analysis, making this a difficult task. Yet it is an important one, because events play crucial roles in so many places: in philosophy of action and mind, in syntax and semantics, and particularly in metaphysics, where they are widely supposed to be the only true causes and effects. Part II, "Thing Causation", argues that the true causes are things. I first argue that previous theories have failed to capture the nature of events. Jaegwon Kim's well-known view takes every event to be associated with a triple of a thing, a repeatable that the thing instantiates, and a time of instantiation. Kim uses this one-to-one association to give existence and identity criteria for events.
I argue that Kim's "events" are not really events at all; insofar as we can make sense of them, they are more like facts or propositions. But Kim's approach should not be abandoned altogether; the problem is not with association itself, but rather with Kim's assumption that association is one-to-one. Dropping this assumption results in a moderately coarse-grained conception of events that better matches our ordinary conception. It shares most of the theoretical virtues that Kim's view enjoys; most importantly, association can still be used to give existence and identity criteria. And it has a number of significant theoretical advantages over Kim's view, two of which I develop in depth : these moderately coarse-grained events are robust enough to support a version of token physicalism that does not collapse into type physicalism, and they illuminate the logical structure of the determinate-determinable relation. A second topic in Part I is the distinction between events and states.
This distinction usually is either ignored, or else captured by taking events, but not states, to be changes in things over time. The latter approach is too narrow, for it precludes instantaneous events, and it forecloses a "dynamic" picture of fundamental reality, on which there are goings-on that (unlike changes) do not consist merely in reality being one way and then another. Instead, events are best understood as cases of things doing something, or simply "doings". Rockslides, for instance, are cases of rocks sliding, and sliding is something rocks can do. Things done, like sliding, are a special sort of repeatable. Thus I say that events are associated with triples of a thing, a repeatable that can be done , and a time. I develop this very broad notion of "doing something" by appealing to a linguistic distinction between dynamic and stative verbs.
This distinction is central to the linguistics literature on aspect, and it is also philosophically important, since dynamic verbs stand for things done, whereas stative verbs stand for properties. Once we understand what events are, it emerges that events are not the sorts of entities that could cause, except in a derivative sense. In Part II, "Thing Causation", I argue that causation most fundamentally involves a thing causing another thing to do something. It is most fundamentally people and explosive substances, not actions and explosions, that cause. Causation between events is reducible to thing causation, but no reverse reduction is possible. I also touch on a number of other questions, including whether causation is partly normative, whether causation can occur even when no particular entity does any causing, and whether free agency involves causation by an agent.
Regarding the last of these, I argue that agent causation is coherent and real, and the best-known objections to it fail completely, but agent causation on its own does not do the heavy lifting some agent-causal theorists expect from it. What is needed for agent-causal freedom is not just any causing done by an agent, but causing that is basic -- that the agent does not do by doing anything further.
by Nathaniel Baron-Schmitt.
Ph. D. in Linguistics
Ph.D.inLinguistics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Marklund, Ellen. "Infants' ability to form verb-action associations." Thesis, Stockholm University, Department of Linguistics, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-8156.
Full textFour- to eight-month-old infants (n=56) were examined on their ability to acquire verb meaning. In a visual preference procedure they were tested on their ability to form verb-action associations by detecting the correlation between auditory speech stimuli and actions presented in short movie clips on a screen. If associations were formed, they were expected to significantly modify their looking behavior after exposure, looking closer to the target than during baseline. Instead of measuring total looking time as response, distance to target was the chosen measure. Eight-month-olds as well as a reference group of adults acquired the verb-action associations. Thus, eight months is the youngest age at which verb meaning acquisition could be demonstrated so far.
Macaire, Dominique. "De la didactique de l'allemand à une didactique du plurilinguisme : la recherche-action comme aide au changement." Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Provence - Aix-Marseille I, 2008. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00554808.
Full textNangu, Bongiwe B. "Teaching in English and Isixhosa: code-switching in grade 11 Biology classes at a school in Khayelitsha." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2006. http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&action=viewtitle&id=gen8Srv25Nme4_7339_1242696871.
Full textThis study explored the use of code-switching in Biology classes at high school level, how it is used in the teaching and learning situation and its effect on the learners' performance in the subject. Grade 11 was chosen as it precedes the last year at high school.
Panayi, Marilyn. "Cognition in action C-i-A : rethinking gesture in neuro-atypical young people : a conceptual framework for embodied, embedded, extended and enacted intentionality." Thesis, City, University of London, 2014. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/15292/.
Full textSaunders, Kristina Maren. "Grammatical reformulation in the sequencing of a complex action: the re-issuing of advice in radio phone-ins." Kansas State University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/15687.
Full textDepartment of Modern Languages
Emma Betz
This conversation analytic study aims to describe how advice is re-issued in German in an institutional setting. Schank (1979) has shown that conversation during German advice programs consists of five different phases, one of which is the advice-giving phase. For the current study, four conversations from a radio advice program were analyzed. The data show that the advice-giving phase identified by Schank is further characterized by three sub-phases: 1) issuing of initial advice, 2) negotiation of rejected advice through reformulations of the initial advice, and 3) offer to move to the closing phase, done via generalization of the previously-given advice. I focus on the delivery of the second phase, in which the advice, previously rejected by the recipient, is re-issued using a number of discourse strategies on the part of the advice giver. These strategies include a change in recipient, a shift in source of the advice, the selection or change in reference (i.e. du ‘you’ vs. ich ‘I’), a change in advised action, and a change in strength. In selecting one of these identified discourse strategies, the advice giver addresses the reason for the rejection of the advice on which the reformulation is based. Finally, in looking at the third phase, I explain the function of generalizations and their role in situating the interlocutors interactionally within the larger advice-giving phase, thus sequencing the complex action (Schank, 1981).
Mheta, Gift. "A contextual analysis of compound nouns in Shona lexicography." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2011. http://etd.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=etd&action=viewtitle&id=gen8Srv25Nme4_2459_1320660934.
Full textBooks on the topic "LINGUISTICS ACTION"
Tabakowska, Elzbieta, Michal Choinski, and Lukasz Wiraszka, eds. Cognitive Linguistics in Action. Berlin, New York: DE GRUYTER MOUTON, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110226096.
Full textCheng, Winnie. Exploring corpus linguistics: Language in action. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2011.
Find full textExploring corpus linguistics: Language in action. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2011.
Find full textKenworthy, Joanne. Language in action: An introduction to modern linguistics. London: Longman, 1991.
Find full textLangage comme action, action par le langage. Grenoble: Université Pierre-Mendès-France, 2015.
Find full textJef, Verschueren, and Verschueren Jef, eds. Linguistic action: Some empirical-conceptual studies. Norwood, N.J: Ablex Pub. Corp., 1987.
Find full textI, Rubanov L., ed. Activity and understanding: Structure of action and orientated linguistics. Singapore: World Scientific, 1995.
Find full text1983-, Choiński Michał, and ebrary Inc, eds. Cognitive linguistics in action: From theory to application and back. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2010.
Find full textZielonogoþrski, Uniwersytet, ed. Die Sprache in Aktion: Pragmatik, Sprechakte, Diskurs = Language in action : pragmatics, speech acts, discourse. Heidelberg: Universita·tsverlag Winter, 2011.
Find full textW, Shuy Roger, and Peyton Joy Kreeft, eds. Language in action: New studies of language in society : essays in honor of Roger W. Shuy. Cresskill, N.J: Hampton Press, 2000.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "LINGUISTICS ACTION"
Lau, Seng-Hian, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai. "Chapter 11. Attitudinal applicative in action." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 244–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.267.11lau.
Full textNapier, Jemina, and Lorraine Leeson. "Understanding Applied Sign Linguistics." In Sign Language in Action, 19–49. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137309778_2.
Full textBurns, Anne. "Action Research." In Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics, 112–34. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517_6.
Full textNerlich, Brigitte. "Language and Action." In History of Linguistics 1993, 299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sihols.78.36ner.
Full textNapier, Jemina, and Lorraine Leeson. "Conducting Research in Applied Sign Linguistics." In Sign Language in Action, 233–66. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137309778_7.
Full textPrikhodko, Maria. "Rhizomes in Action: International Multilingual Student Writers’ Literacies." In Educational Linguistics, 209–29. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26994-4_11.
Full textPietikäinen, Sari, and Hannele Dufva. "Heteroglossia in Action: Sámi Children, Textbooks and Rap." In Educational Linguistics, 59–74. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7856-6_4.
Full textBressem, Jana, Silva H. Ladewig, and Cornelia Müller. "Ways of expressing action in multimodal narrations – the semiotic complexity of character viewpoint depictions." In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.247.10bre.
Full textBurns, Anne, and Pamela McPherson. "Action Research as Iterative Design: Implications for English Language Education Research." In Educational Linguistics, 105–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49140-0_8.
Full textChan, Cheri, and Chris Davison. "Learning from Each Other: School-University Collaborative Action Research as Praxis." In Educational Linguistics, 129–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35081-9_7.
Full textConference papers on the topic "LINGUISTICS ACTION"
Pando, Magdalena. "Action Research: Linguistics Knowledge for Secondary Teachers of English Learners." In 2021 AERA Annual Meeting. Washington DC: AERA, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1690522.
Full textGao, Qiaozi, Shaohua Yang, Joyce Chai, and Lucy Vanderwende. "What Action Causes This? Towards Naive Physical Action-Effect Prediction." In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/p18-1086.
Full textCohen, Amir, Amir Kantor, Sagi Hilleli, and Eyal Kolman. "Automatic Rephrasing of Transcripts-based Action Items." In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.253.
Full textHuang, Xinting, Jianzhong Qi, Yu Sun, and Rui Zhang. "Generalizable and Explainable Dialogue Generation via Explicit Action Learning." In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.355.
Full textKohita, Ryosuke, Akifumi Wachi, Daiki Kimura, Subhajit Chaudhury, Michiaki Tatsubori, and Asim Munawar. "Language-based General Action Template for Reinforcement Learning Agents." In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.187.
Full textKambanaro, Maria, Kleanthes K. Grohmann, and Eleni Theodorou. "Action and object naming in mono- and bilingual children with language impairment." In 3rd Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics. ExLing Society, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36505/exling-2010/03/0019/000139.
Full textHaoyin Hsieh, Ivy, and Jimmy Tsung-han Weng. "Implementing Critical Thinking in an EFL Writing Class: A Preliminary Analysis of Action Research." In Annual International Conference on Language, Literature & Linguistics. Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF), 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-3566_l31292.
Full textKucherova, K. A. "VERBS OF INVOLUNTARY ACTION IN THE RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES IN THE COMPARATIVE ASPECT." In ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES. TSU Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/978-5-907442-02-3-2021-62.
Full textLi, YunHao, Yunyi Yang, Xiaojun Quan, and Jianxing Yu. "Retrieve & Memorize: Dialog Policy Learning with Multi-Action Memory." In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.39.
Full textYamazaki, Takato, and Akiko Aizawa. "Phrase-Level Action Reinforcement Learning for Neural Dialog Response Generation." In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.446.
Full textReports on the topic "LINGUISTICS ACTION"
Fridman, Alex, Ariel Stolerman, Sayandeep Acharya, Patrick Brennan, Patrick Juola, Rachel Greenstadt, and Moshe Kam. Active Authentication Linguistic Modalities. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada593716.
Full textNezhyva, Liudmyla L., Svitlana P. Palamar, and Oksana S. Lytvyn. Perspectives on the use of augmented reality within the linguistic and literary field of primary education. [б. в.], November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4415.
Full textWillis, Craig, Will Hughes, and Sergiusz Bober. ECMI Minorities Blog. National and Linguistic Minorities in the Context of Professional Football across Europe: Five Examples from Non-kin State Situations. European Centre for Minority Issues, December 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53779/bvkl7633.
Full textKankash, Н., Т. Cherkasova, S. Novoseletska, N. Shapran, and L. Bilokonenko. The Use of Linguistic Means of Figurativeness and Evaluativity to Exert Influence in the Speeches of the Chief Delegates of the Ukrainian SSR at the Sessions of the UN General Assembly. Криворізький державний педагогічний університет, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4648.
Full textPrisacariu, Roxana. Swiss immigrants’ integration policy as inspiration for the Romanian Roma inclusion strategy. Fribourg (Switzerland): IFF, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.51363/unifr.diff.2015.05.
Full textYatsymirska, Mariya. SOCIAL EXPRESSION IN MULTIMEDIA TEXTS. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2021.49.11072.
Full text